94:, Clause 1) states that "the judicial Power shall extend ... to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party". This clause has been deemed to impose a requirement that United States federal courts are not permitted to cases that do not pose an actual controversy—that is, an actual dispute between adverse parties which is capable of being resolved by the . In addition to setting out the scope of the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, it also prohibits courts from issuing
274:
198:. As with other controversies, it has been suggested that exposure to empirical facts would be sufficient to resolve the debate once and for all. In computer simulations of cultural communities, beliefs were found to polarize within isolated sub-groups, based on the mistaken belief of the community's unhindered access to ground truth. Such confidence in the group to find the ground truth is explicable through the success of
212:
have shown that sensory input from different senses is integrated in a statistically optimal way, in addition, it appears that the kind of inferences used to infer single sources for multiple sensory inputs uses a
Bayesian inference about the causal origin of the sensory stimuli. As such, it appears
225:
context β in spite of identical evidence presented, the pre-existing beliefs (or evidence presented first) has an overwhelming effect on the beliefs formed. In addition, the preferences of the agent (the particular rewards that they value) also cause the beliefs formed to change β this explains the
183:
has been particularly identified as relevant in climate change controversies as individuals are found to be more positively inclined to believe in climate change if the outside temperature is higher, if they have been primed to think about heat, and if they are primed with higher temperatures when
216:
Brocas and
Carrillo propose a model to make decisions based on noisy sensory inputs, beliefs about the state of the world are modified by Bayesian updating, and then decisions are made based on beliefs passing a threshold. They show that this model, when optimized for single-step decision making,
142:
In other words, it claims that the less factual information is available on a topic, the more controversy can arise around that topic β and the more facts are available, the less controversy can arise. Thus, for example, controversies in physics would be limited to subject areas where experiments
163:, it has been proposed that those who are opposed to the scientific consensus do so because they don't have enough information about the topic. A study of 1540 US adults found instead that levels of scientific literacy correlated with the strength of
491:
Kahan, Dan M.; Maggie
Wittlin; Ellen Peters; Paul Slovic; Lisa Larrimore Ouellette; Donald Braman; Gregory N. Mandel (2011). "The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change".
170:
The puzzling phenomenon of two individuals being able to reach different conclusions after being exposed to the same facts has been frequently explained (particularly by Daniel
Kahneman) by reference to a
91:
230:) shown above. This model allows the production of controversy to be seen as a consequence of a decision maker optimized for single-step decision making, rather than a result of limited reasoning in the
264:
191:, the same evidence seemed to license inference to radically different conclusions. Kahan et al. explained this by the cognitive biases of biased assimilation and a credibility heuristic.
155:, which only talks about lack of information ("passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available"). For example, in analyses of the political controversy over
262:
143:
cannot be carried out yet, whereas controversies would be inherent to politics, where communities must frequently decide on courses of action based on insufficient information.
793:
Lord, Charles G.; Lee Ross; Mark R. Lepper (1979). "Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence".
263:
698:
Joireman, Jeff; Heather Barnes
Truelove; Blythe Duell (December 2010). "Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming".
208:
allows these failures of rationality to be described as part of a statistically optimized system for decision making. Experiments and computational models in
770:; Paul Slovic; John Gastil (2008-07-15). "Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition".
87:
559:
133:
977:
Ernst, Marc O.; Martin S. Banks (2002-01-24). "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion".
213:
neurobiologically plausible that the brain implements decision-making procedures that are close to optimal for
Bayesian inference.
892:
179:
that work well in every day situations, but are not amenable to decision-making about complex subjects such as climate change.
202:
based inferences. However, if there is no access to the ground truth, as there was not in this model, the method will fail.
355:
677:
151:
Controversies are frequently thought to be a result of a lack of confidence on the part of the disputants β as implied by
448:
Pidgeon, N.; B. Fischhoff (2011). "The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks".
195:
945:
Lee, M.D.; M. Steyvers; M. de Young; B.J. Miller. "A Model-Based
Approach to Measuring Expertise in Ranking Tasks".
838:
HOVLAND, CARL I.; WALTER WEISS (1951-12-21). "The
Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness".
164:
384:
152:
120:
115:
1114:
359:
1077:
Brocas, Isabelle; Juan D. Carrillo (2012). "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes".
156:
31:
413:
Ungar, S. (2000). "Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole".
222:
83:
298:
963:
807:
579:
544:
209:
17:
1156:
1151:
868:
Braman, Donald; James
Grimmelmann; Dan M. Kahan (20 July 2007). "Modeling Cultural Cognition".
802:
574:
194:
Similar effects on reasoning are also seen in non-scientific controversies, for example in the
76:
893:"Surprising Finding That Cultural Worldviews Don't Explain People's Views on Gun Control, The"
877:
779:
523:
950:
531:
336:
40:
is a state of prolonged public dispute or debate, usually concerning a matter of conflicting
986:
734:
645:
457:
294:
279:
608:
8:
231:
199:
172:
990:
649:
461:
1018:
912:
669:
600:
511:
473:
430:
1126:
1094:
1059:
1010:
1002:
873:
820:
775:
767:
742:
715:
673:
661:
592:
519:
227:
129:
515:
477:
426:
1130:
1086:
1049:
994:
904:
847:
812:
707:
653:
584:
501:
493:
465:
434:
422:
95:
657:
1022:
816:
363:
235:
205:
124:
711:
633:
588:
321:
311:
1090:
765:
1145:
1098:
1006:
824:
746:
719:
596:
160:
64:
1119:
1063:
1014:
697:
665:
72:
490:
497:
469:
188:
137:
282:
was created from a revision of this article dated 27 June 2013
916:
604:
392:
326:
68:
506:
316:
218:
184:
thinking about the future temperature increases from climate change.
180:
176:
998:
908:
1054:
1037:
867:
851:
306:
175:' β in other words, that most judgments are made using fast acting
103:
99:
560:"Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics"
1038:"Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference"
331:
41:
944:
123:, as expressed by the astrophysicist and science fiction author
1136:
45:
1035:
221:
and polarization of opinions β exactly as described in the
792:
167:, but not on which side of the debate that they stood.
1076:
102:, meaning that the controversy has not arisen yet, or
929:
976:
890:
837:
634:"Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases"
447:
932:Shooting down the more guns, less crime hypothesis
735:"Furor on Rush to Require Cervical Cancer Vaccine"
732:
631:
106:, meaning that the controversy has already been
187:In other controversies β such as that around the
1143:
88:Article Three of the United States Constitution
44:or point of view. The word was coined from the
1036:Wozny, D.R.; U.R. Beierholm; L. Shams (2008).
733:Saul, Stephanie; Andrew Pollack (2007-02-17).
79:, a controversy is a purely civil proceeding.
863:
861:
795:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1123:(SparsnΓ€s, Sweden: Irene Publishing, 2014).
27:State of prolonged public dispute or debate
858:
1053:
806:
578:
505:
159:, which is exceptionally virulent in the
557:
290:, and does not reflect subsequent edits.
273:
98:, or from hearing cases that are either
934:. National Bureau of Economic Research.
196:gun control debate in the United States
71:; while legal cases include all suits,
14:
1144:
146:
891:Fremling, G.M.; J.R. Lott Jr (2002).
412:
55:β "turned in an opposite direction".
930:Ayres, I.; J.J. Donohue III (2002).
700:Journal of Environmental Psychology
226:biased assimilation (also known as
24:
260:
25:
1168:
1108:
632:Tversky, A.; D. Kahneman (1974).
272:
109:
1070:
1029:
970:
938:
923:
884:
831:
786:
759:
680:from the original on 2018-06-01
558:Kahneman, Daniel (2003-12-01).
415:Public Understanding of Science
67:, a controversy differs from a
766:Kahan, Dan M.; Donald Braman;
726:
691:
625:
551:
484:
441:
406:
377:
360:Electronic Frontier Foundation
348:
13:
1:
658:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
342:
817:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
567:The American Economic Review
362:. 2001-04-09. Archived from
356:"EFF Quotes Collection 19.6"
157:anthropogenic climate change
153:Benford's law of controversy
121:Benford's law of controversy
116:Benford's law of controversy
32:Controversy (disambiguation)
7:
1079:Games and Economic Behavior
712:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.004
385:"Quotations: Computer Laws"
241:
10:
1173:
589:10.1257/000282803322655392
223:global warming controversy
113:
84:Case or Controversy Clause
29:
1091:10.1016/j.geb.2011.10.001
427:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306
165:opinion on climate change
840:Public Opinion Quarterly
210:multisensory integration
206:Bayesian decision theory
58:
870:Social Justice Research
1120:The Controversy Manual
958:Cite journal requires
772:Law and Human Behavior
539:Cite journal requires
268:
248:Listen to this article
136:to the amount of real
134:inversely proportional
450:Nature Climate Change
337:Third rail (politics)
267:
1127:Controversial topics
498:10.2139/ssrn.1871503
470:10.1038/nclimate1080
299:More spoken articles
51:, as a composite of
30:For other uses, see
1137:Controversial Today
991:2002Natur.415..429E
650:1974Sci...185.1124T
462:2011NatCC...1...35P
232:bounded rationality
200:wisdom of the crowd
173:bounded rationality
147:Psychological bases
739:The New York Times
269:
1133:on Knowledge data
1042:Journal of Vision
985:(6870): 429β433.
801:(11): 2098β2109.
768:Geoffrey L. Cohen
644:(4157): 1124β31.
265:
228:confirmation bias
127:in 1980, states:
96:advisory opinions
82:For example, the
16:(Redirected from
1164:
1131:machine learning
1103:
1102:
1074:
1068:
1067:
1057:
1033:
1027:
1026:
974:
968:
967:
961:
956:
954:
946:
942:
936:
935:
927:
921:
920:
903:(4): 1341β1348.
888:
882:
881:
865:
856:
855:
835:
829:
828:
810:
790:
784:
783:
763:
757:
756:
754:
753:
730:
724:
723:
695:
689:
688:
686:
685:
629:
623:
622:
620:
619:
613:
607:. Archived from
582:
573:(5): 1449β1475.
564:
555:
549:
548:
542:
537:
535:
527:
509:
488:
482:
481:
445:
439:
438:
410:
404:
403:
401:
400:
391:. Archived from
381:
375:
374:
372:
371:
352:
289:
287:
276:
275:
266:
256:
254:
249:
217:produces belief
21:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1142:
1141:
1111:
1106:
1075:
1071:
1034:
1030:
999:10.1038/415429a
975:
971:
959:
957:
948:
947:
943:
939:
928:
924:
909:10.2307/3312932
889:
885:
866:
859:
836:
832:
808:10.1.1.372.1743
791:
787:
764:
760:
751:
749:
731:
727:
696:
692:
683:
681:
630:
626:
617:
615:
611:
580:10.1.1.194.6554
562:
556:
552:
540:
538:
529:
528:
489:
485:
446:
442:
411:
407:
398:
396:
383:
382:
378:
369:
367:
354:
353:
349:
345:
303:
302:
291:
285:
283:
280:This audio file
277:
270:
261:
258:
252:
251:
247:
244:
236:Daniel Kahneman
149:
125:Gregory Benford
118:
112:
61:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1170:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1124:
1110:
1109:External links
1107:
1105:
1104:
1069:
1055:10.1167/8.3.24
1048:(3): 24.1β11.
1028:
969:
960:|journal=
937:
922:
883:
857:
852:10.1086/266350
846:(4): 635β650.
830:
785:
758:
725:
706:(4): 358β367.
690:
624:
550:
541:|journal=
483:
440:
421:(3): 297β312.
405:
376:
346:
344:
341:
340:
339:
334:
329:
324:
322:Misinformation
319:
314:
312:Bipartisanship
309:
292:
278:
271:
259:
246:
245:
243:
240:
148:
145:
114:Main article:
111:
108:
60:
57:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1169:
1158:
1157:English words
1155:
1153:
1152:Controversies
1150:
1149:
1147:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1073:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1032:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
973:
965:
952:
941:
933:
926:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:U. Pa. L. Rev
894:
887:
879:
875:
871:
864:
862:
853:
849:
845:
841:
834:
826:
822:
818:
814:
809:
804:
800:
796:
789:
781:
777:
773:
769:
762:
748:
744:
740:
736:
729:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
694:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
628:
614:on 2018-02-19
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
581:
576:
572:
568:
561:
554:
546:
533:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
503:
499:
495:
487:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
444:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
409:
395:on 2008-08-22
394:
390:
386:
380:
366:on 2007-09-29
365:
361:
357:
351:
347:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
300:
296:
281:
239:
237:
233:
229:
224:
220:
214:
211:
207:
203:
201:
197:
192:
190:
185:
182:
178:
174:
168:
166:
162:
161:United States
158:
154:
144:
141:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
110:Benford's law
107:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
80:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:theory of law
56:
54:
50:
47:
43:
39:
33:
19:
1118:
1115:Brian Martin
1082:
1078:
1072:
1045:
1041:
1031:
982:
978:
972:
951:cite journal
940:
931:
925:
900:
896:
886:
869:
843:
839:
833:
798:
794:
788:
771:
761:
750:. Retrieved
738:
728:
703:
699:
693:
682:. Retrieved
641:
637:
627:
616:. Retrieved
609:the original
570:
566:
553:
532:cite journal
486:
456:(1): 35β41.
453:
449:
443:
418:
414:
408:
397:. Retrieved
393:the original
388:
379:
368:. Retrieved
364:the original
350:
215:
204:
193:
186:
169:
150:
128:
119:
81:
62:
53:controversus
52:
49:controversia
48:
37:
36:
189:HPV vaccine
138:information
75:as well as
38:Controversy
1146:Categories
1085:: 81β103.
752:2011-11-26
684:2017-08-30
618:2017-10-24
507:1794/22097
399:2007-03-10
370:2016-12-04
343:References
327:ProCon.org
295:Audio help
286:2013-06-27
177:heuristics
140:available.
69:legal case
1129:based on
1099:0899-8256
1007:0028-0836
825:0022-3514
803:CiteSeerX
747:0362-4331
720:0272-4944
674:143452957
597:0002-8282
575:CiteSeerX
317:Dialectic
219:anchoring
181:Anchoring
92:Section 2
1064:18484830
1015:11807554
678:Archived
666:17835457
516:73649608
478:85362091
307:Argument
297: Β·
242:See also
73:criminal
18:Disputed
987:Bibcode
917:3312932
878:1000449
780:1160654
646:Bibcode
638:Science
605:3132137
524:1871503
458:Bibcode
435:7089937
389:SysProg
332:Scandal
284: (
255:minutes
130:Passion
63:In the
42:opinion
1097:
1062:
1021:
1013:
1005:
979:Nature
915:
876:
823:
805:
778:
745:
718:
672:
664:
603:
595:
577:
522:
514:
476:
433:
100:unripe
1023:47459
1019:S2CID
913:JSTOR
670:S2CID
612:(PDF)
601:JSTOR
563:(PDF)
512:S2CID
474:S2CID
431:S2CID
77:civil
59:Legal
46:Latin
1095:ISSN
1060:PMID
1011:PMID
1003:ISSN
964:help
874:SSRN
821:ISSN
776:SSRN
743:ISSN
716:ISSN
662:PMID
593:ISSN
545:help
520:SSRN
104:moot
1087:doi
1050:doi
995:doi
983:415
905:doi
901:151
848:doi
813:doi
708:doi
654:doi
642:185
585:doi
502:hdl
494:doi
466:doi
423:doi
234:of
132:is
86:of
1148::
1117:,
1093:.
1083:75
1081:.
1058:.
1044:.
1040:.
1017:.
1009:.
1001:.
993:.
981:.
955::
953:}}
949:{{
911:.
899:.
895:.
872:.
860:^
844:15
842:.
819:.
811:.
799:37
797:.
774:.
741:.
737:.
714:.
704:30
702:.
676:.
668:.
660:.
652:.
640:.
636:.
599:.
591:.
583:.
571:93
569:.
565:.
536::
534:}}
530:{{
518:.
510:.
500:.
472:.
464:.
452:.
429:.
417:.
387:.
358:.
238:.
1101:.
1089::
1066:.
1052::
1046:8
1025:.
997::
989::
966:)
962:(
919:.
907::
880:.
854:.
850::
827:.
815::
782:.
755:.
722:.
710::
687:.
656::
648::
621:.
587::
547:)
543:(
526:.
504::
496::
480:.
468::
460::
454:1
437:.
425::
419:9
402:.
373:.
301:)
293:(
288:)
257:)
253:8
250:(
171:'
90:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.