Knowledge

Horopter

Source 📝

184:
Unfortunately, their attempt to correct this assumption was flawed, as demonstrated in Turski (2016). This analysis shows that, for a given fixation point, one has a slightly different horopter circle for each different choice of the nodal point's location. Moreover, if one changes the fixation point along a given Vieth-Müller circle such that the vergence value remains constant, one obtains an infinite family of such horopters, to the extent that the nodal point deviates from the eye's rotation center. These statements follow from the Central Angle Theorem and the fact that three non-collinear points give a unique circle. It can also be shown that, for fixations along a given Vieth-Müller circle, all the corresponding horopter circles intersect at the point of symmetric convergence. This result implies that each member of the infinite family of horopters is also composed of a circle in the fixation plane and a perpendicular straight line passing through the point of symmetric convergence (located on the circle) so long as the eyes are in primary or secondary position.
150:, allowing him to explore the empirical horopter. He found that there were many points in space that yielded single vision; this is very different from the theoretical horopter, and subsequent authors have similarly found that the empirical horopter deviates from the form expected on the basis of simple geometry. Recently, plausible explanation has been provided to this deviation, showing that the empirical horopter is adapted to the statistics of retinal disparities normally experienced in natural environments. In this way, the visual system is able to optimize its resources to the stimuli that are more likely to be experienced. 188:
single-loop spiral passing through the fixation point and converging toward the vertical horopter at the top and bottom extremities and passing through the nodal point of the two eyes. This form was predicted by Helmholtz and subsequently confirmed by Solomons. In the general case that includes the fact that the eyes cyclorotate when viewing above or below the primary horopter circle, the theoretical horopter components of the circle and straight line rotate vertically around the axis of the nodal points of the eyes.
247:. The empirical horopter is flatter than predicted from geometry at short fixation distances and becomes convex for farther fixation distances. Moreover the vertical horopter have been consistently found to have a backward tilt of about 2 degrees relative to its predicted orientation (perpendicular to the fixation plane). The theory underlying these deviations is that the binocular visual system is adapted to the irregularities that can be encountered in natural environments. 175:) which is perpendicular to this arc in the median plane, cutting it at the point midway between the two eyes (which may, or may not, be the fixation point). This horopter geometry of an arc in the fixation plane and a perpendicular line remains approximately fixed relative to the eye centers as long as the eyes are fixating somewhere on these two lines. When the eyes are fixated anywhere off these two lines, the theoretical horopter takes the form of a 261: 20: 179:
passing through the fixation point and asymptoting to the two lines at their extremes. (Under no conditions does the horopter become either a cylinder through the Vieth-Müller circle or a torus centered on the nodal points of the two eyes, as is often popularly assumed.) If the eyes are fixating
94:
and discovered that objects lying on a horizontal line passing through the fixation point resulted in single images, while objects a reasonable distance from this line resulted in double images. Thus Alhazen noticed the importance of some points in the visual field but did not work out the exact
77:
As other quantities that describe the functional principles of the visual system, it is possible to provide a theoretical description of the phenomenon. The measurement with psycho-physical experiments usually provide an empirical definition that slightly deviates from the theoretical one. The
187:
When the eyes are in tertiary position away from the two basic horopter lines, the vertical disparities due to the differential magnification of the distance above or below the Vieth-Müller circle have to be taken into account, as was calculated by Helmholtz. In this case the horopter becomes a
183:
In detail, the identification of the theoretical/geometrical horopter with the Vieth-Müller circle is only an approximation. It was pointed out in Gulick and Lawson (1976) that Müller's anatomical approximation that the nodal point and eye rotation center are coincident should be refined.
166:
worked out the exact shape of the horopter almost at the same time. Their descriptions identified two components for the horopter for symmetrical fixation closer than infinity. The first is in the plane which contains the fixation point (wherever it is) and the two nodal points of the eye.
126:
made a similar conclusion for the horizontal plane containing the fixation point, although he did expect the horopter to be a surface in space (i.e., not restricted to the horizontal plane). The theoretical/geometrical horopter in the horizontal plane became known as the
171:) going from one nodal point to the other in space and passing through the fixation point, until Howarth (2011) noted that it was only the portion of the circle containing the fixation point that made the same angle at the two eyes. The second component is a line (the 240:. Although these various horopters are measured using different techniques and have different theoretical motivations, the shape of the horopter remains identical regardless of the criterion used for its determination. 886:
Ames, A., Jr, & Ogle, K. N. (1932). Size and shape of ocular images: III. Visual sensitivity to differences in the relative size of the ocular images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 7(6), 904-924.
200:
in 1858. He proposed that any point in one retina might yield singleness of vision with any point within a circular region centred on the corresponding point in the other retina. This has become known as
874:
Gibaldi, A., Labhishetty, V., Thibos, L. N., & Banks, M. S. (2021). The blur horopter: Retinal conjugate surface in binocular viewing. Journal of Vision, 21(3), 8.
597:
Wheatstone C (1838). "Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. Part the First. On Some Remarkable, and Hitherto Unobserved, Phenomena of Binocular Vision".
180:
anywhere at infinity, the Vieth-Müller circle has infinite radius and the horopter becomes the two-dimensional plane through the two straight horopter lines.
78:
underlying theory is that this deviation represents an adaptation of the visual system to the regularities that can be encountered in natural environments.
243:
Consistently, the shape of the empirical horopter have been found to deviate from the geometrical horopter. For the horizontal horopter this is called the
196:
As Wheatstone (1838) observed, the empirical horopter, defined by singleness of vision, is much larger than the theoretical horopter. This was studied by
209:, although recently that has been taken to mean the area in the horizontal plane, around the Vieth-Müller circle, where any point appears single. 111: 55:, that is, on anatomically identical points. The horopter can be measured empirically in which it is defined using some criterion. 58:
The concept of horopter can then be extended as a geometrical locus of points in space where a specific condition is met:
224:, according that identical visual directions cause no apparent motion). Other criteria used over the years include the 51:
as fixation. This can be defined theoretically as the points in space that project on corresponding points in the two
308: 290: 286: 119: 244: 86:
The horopter as a special set of points of single vision was first mentioned in the eleventh century by
282: 326: 271: 167:
Historically the geometric locus of horopteric points in this plane was taken to be a circle (the
275: 212:
These early empirical investigations used the criterion of singleness of vision, or absence of
836:"The extended horopter: Quantifying retinal correspondence across changes of 3D eye position" 159: 123: 103: 606: 470: 408: 329:
with respect to two cameras with the same intrinsic parameters. It is given generally by a
325:, the horopter is defined as the curve of points in 3D space having identical coordinates 8: 459:"The Active Side of Stereopsis: Fixation Strategy and Adaptation to Natural Environments" 48: 610: 474: 412: 888: 622: 576: 491: 458: 429: 396: 197: 143: 115: 857: 816: 789: 747: 668: 496: 434: 216:
to determine the horopter. Today the horopter is usually defined by the criterion of
40: 847: 737: 658: 614: 568: 486: 478: 424: 416: 373:. In some degenerate configurations, the horopter reduces to a line plus a circle. 44: 36: 16:
All points in space which project onto the same points in the retinas of both eyes
911: 906: 742: 725: 663: 646: 322: 87: 28: 23:
Schematic representation of the theoretical (T) and the empirical (E) horopter.
118:
that the horopter must be a circle passing through the fixation-point and the
900: 330: 176: 861: 751: 672: 618: 500: 438: 420: 163: 90:, known to the west as "Alhazen". He built on the binocular vision work of 820: 793: 147: 580: 559:
Glanville AD (1993). "The Psychological Significance of the Horopter".
370: 626: 482: 875: 693:
The horopter and binocular fusion. In Vision and visual dysfunction 9
572: 260: 95:
shape of the horopter and used singleness of vision as a criterion.
213: 852: 835: 47:
it is taken to be the locus of points in space that have the same
516:
Alhazen's theory of visual perception. Vol. 2 English translation
91: 39:
of points in space that make the same angle at each eye with the
726:"On binocular vision: The geometric horopter and Cyclopean eye" 107: 52: 19: 599:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
807:
Solomons H (1975). "Properties of the space horopter".
780:
Solomons H (1975). "Derivation of the space horopter".
889:
https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1932.00820130088008
397:"Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment" 833: 153: 35:was originally defined in geometric terms as the 898: 592: 590: 191: 135:for the claim that this has been the case of a 250: 66:is the locus of iso-disparity points in space; 827: 800: 773: 719: 717: 587: 452: 450: 448: 390: 388: 386: 73:is the locus of iso-vergence points in space. 764: 705: 552: 43:point, although more recently in studies of 809:The British Journal of Physiological Optics 782:The British Journal of Physiological Optics 767:Seeing in depth, volume 2: Depth perception 708:Human Stereopsis: A psychophysical analysis 686: 684: 682: 289:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 714: 596: 445: 383: 851: 834:Schreiber KM, Tweed DB, Schor CM (2006). 741: 662: 640: 638: 636: 558: 490: 428: 309:Learn how and when to remove this message 806: 779: 679: 18: 765:Howard, Ian P; Rogers, Brian J (2002). 644: 456: 394: 369:(θ) are three independent third-degree 226:apparent fronto-parallel plane horopter 899: 723: 633: 543: 81: 690: 531:Ptolemy's Theory of Visual Perception 528: 513: 710:. New York: Oxford University Press. 287:adding citations to reliable sources 254: 122:of the two eyes. A few years later 13: 876:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.3.8 561:The American Journal of Psychology 106:in the second of his six books in 14: 923: 706:Gulick, W L; Lawson, R B (1976). 533:. American Philosophical Society. 518:. American Philosophical Society. 259: 131:. However, see the next section 880: 868: 769:. Ontario, Canada: I. Porteous. 758: 699: 537: 522: 507: 154:Theoretical binocular horopter 1: 691:Tyler, Christopher W (1991). 457:Gibaldi; et al. (2017). 395:Sprague; et al. (2015). 376: 333:, i.e., a curve of the form 220:(similar in principle to the 743:10.1016/j.visres.2015.11.001 664:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.018 192:Empirical binocular horopter 7: 251:Horopter in computer vision 245:Hering-Hillebrand deviation 218:identical visual directions 10: 928: 647:"The geometric horopter" 544:Aguilonius, Franciscus. 222:apparent motion horopter 529:Smith, A. Mark (1996). 514:Smith, A. Mark (2001). 173:Prévost–Burckhardt line 724:Turski, Jacek (2016). 619:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019 421:10.1126/sciadv.1400254 230:equi-distance horopter 24: 203:Panum's fusional area 160:Hermann von Helmholtz 139:for about 200 years. 104:Franciscus Aguilonius 22: 283:improve this section 133:Theoretical horopter 645:Howarth PA (2011). 611:1838RSPT..128..371W 546:Opticorum libri sex 475:2017NatSR...744800G 413:2015SciA....1E0254S 238:plumb-line horopter 169:Vieth-Müller circle 129:Vieth-Müller circle 82:History of the term 71:oculomotor horopter 463:Scientific Reports 234:drop-test horopter 198:Peter Ludvig Panum 144:Charles Wheatstone 116:Euclidean geometry 110:in 1613. In 1818, 102:was introduced by 64:binocular horopter 25: 840:Journal of Vision 695:. pp. 19–37. 483:10.1038/srep44800 319: 318: 311: 137:mistaken identity 919: 891: 884: 878: 872: 866: 865: 855: 831: 825: 824: 804: 798: 797: 777: 771: 770: 762: 756: 755: 745: 721: 712: 711: 703: 697: 696: 688: 677: 676: 666: 642: 631: 630: 594: 585: 584: 556: 550: 549: 541: 535: 534: 526: 520: 519: 511: 505: 504: 494: 454: 443: 442: 432: 401:Science Advances 392: 314: 307: 303: 300: 294: 263: 255: 45:binocular vision 927: 926: 922: 921: 920: 918: 917: 916: 897: 896: 895: 894: 885: 881: 873: 869: 832: 828: 815:(2–4): 81–100. 805: 801: 778: 774: 763: 759: 730:Vision Research 722: 715: 704: 700: 689: 680: 651:Vision Research 643: 634: 595: 588: 573:10.2307/1416191 557: 553: 542: 538: 527: 523: 512: 508: 455: 446: 407:(4): e1400254. 393: 384: 379: 323:computer vision 315: 304: 298: 295: 280: 264: 253: 194: 156: 124:Johannes Müller 84: 17: 12: 11: 5: 925: 915: 914: 909: 893: 892: 879: 867: 826: 799: 788:(2–4): 56–80. 772: 757: 713: 698: 678: 632: 586: 567:(4): 592–627. 551: 536: 521: 506: 444: 381: 380: 378: 375: 317: 316: 267: 265: 258: 252: 249: 193: 190: 155: 152: 88:Ibn al-Haytham 83: 80: 75: 74: 67: 29:vision science 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 924: 913: 910: 908: 905: 904: 902: 890: 883: 877: 871: 863: 859: 854: 853:10.1167/6.1.6 849: 845: 841: 837: 830: 822: 818: 814: 810: 803: 795: 791: 787: 783: 776: 768: 761: 753: 749: 744: 739: 735: 731: 727: 720: 718: 709: 702: 694: 687: 685: 683: 674: 670: 665: 660: 656: 652: 648: 641: 639: 637: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 593: 591: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 555: 547: 540: 532: 525: 517: 510: 502: 498: 493: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 453: 451: 449: 440: 436: 431: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 391: 389: 387: 382: 374: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 353: =  352: 348: 345: =  344: 340: 337: =  336: 332: 331:twisted cubic 328: 324: 313: 310: 302: 292: 288: 284: 278: 277: 273: 268:This section 266: 262: 257: 256: 248: 246: 241: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 208: 204: 199: 189: 185: 181: 178: 177:twisted cubic 174: 170: 165: 161: 151: 149: 146:invented the 145: 140: 138: 134: 130: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112:Gerhard Vieth 109: 105: 101: 96: 93: 89: 79: 72: 68: 65: 61: 60: 59: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 21: 882: 870: 846:(1): 64–74. 843: 839: 829: 812: 808: 802: 785: 781: 775: 766: 760: 733: 729: 707: 701: 692: 657:(4): 397–9. 654: 650: 602: 598: 564: 560: 554: 545: 539: 530: 524: 515: 509: 466: 462: 404: 400: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 320: 305: 299:January 2017 296: 281:Please help 269: 242: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 211: 207:Panum's area 206: 202: 195: 186: 182: 172: 168: 164:Ewald Hering 157: 141: 136: 132: 128: 114:argued from 99: 97: 85: 76: 70: 63: 57: 32: 26: 371:polynomials 327:projections 148:stereoscope 120:nodal point 901:Categories 605:: 371–94. 377:References 357:(θ) where 205:, or just 736:: 73–81. 469:: 44800. 270:does not 142:In 1838, 98:The term 49:disparity 862:16489859 752:26548811 673:21256858 501:28317909 439:26207262 214:diplopia 100:horopter 41:fixation 33:horopter 821:1236461 794:1236460 607:Bibcode 581:1416191 492:5357847 471:Bibcode 430:4507831 409:Bibcode 291:removed 276:sources 236:or the 158:Later, 92:Ptolemy 53:retinas 912:Curves 907:Vision 860:  819:  792:  750:  671:  627:108203 625:  579:  499:  489:  437:  427:  232:, the 228:, the 108:optics 31:, the 623:JSTOR 577:JSTOR 365:(θ), 361:(θ), 349:(θ), 341:(θ), 37:locus 858:PMID 817:PMID 790:PMID 748:PMID 669:PMID 497:PMID 435:PMID 274:any 272:cite 162:and 69:the 62:the 848:doi 738:doi 734:119 659:doi 615:doi 603:128 569:doi 487:PMC 479:doi 425:PMC 417:doi 321:In 285:by 27:In 903:: 856:. 842:. 838:. 813:30 811:. 786:30 784:. 746:. 732:. 728:. 716:^ 681:^ 667:. 655:51 653:. 649:. 635:^ 621:. 613:. 601:. 589:^ 575:. 565:45 563:. 495:. 485:. 477:. 465:. 461:. 447:^ 433:. 423:. 415:. 403:. 399:. 385:^ 864:. 850:: 844:6 823:. 796:. 754:. 740:: 675:. 661:: 629:. 617:: 609:: 583:. 571:: 548:. 503:. 481:: 473:: 467:7 441:. 419:: 411:: 405:1 367:z 363:y 359:x 355:z 351:z 347:y 343:y 339:x 335:x 312:) 306:( 301:) 297:( 293:. 279:.

Index


vision science
locus
fixation
binocular vision
disparity
retinas
Ibn al-Haytham
Ptolemy
Franciscus Aguilonius
optics
Gerhard Vieth
Euclidean geometry
nodal point
Johannes Müller
Charles Wheatstone
stereoscope
Hermann von Helmholtz
Ewald Hering
twisted cubic
Peter Ludvig Panum
diplopia
Hering-Hillebrand deviation

cite
sources
improve this section
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
Learn how and when to remove this message

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.