Knowledge

Silent Talker Lie Detector

Source ๐Ÿ“

64:
and guilt that produces the anxiety and nervousness. When a person feels this way they exhibit difficult to detect involuntary physiological changes that can be detected with a polygraph. Most polygraph examiners will say that they do not test specifically for lies, but for these deceptive reactions. The Silent Talker camera allows the examiner to add microexpressions that may be more directly associated with actual lying. And, since microexpressions are more difficult for the subject to control, theoretically they could provide the examiner with better data.
87:
the truthfulness of the speaker. Ekman explains that "micro expressions are facial expressions that occur within a fraction of a second. This involuntary emotional leakage exposes a person's true emotions." However, the evidence doesn't show that this device actually makes a difference in the interpretation of the results.
129:. They concluded that this system is not only cumbersome and expensive but gave a false report that a traveler was lying when that was not actually the case. This example clearly shows the dangers of using this system, including that it may be used to deny entry to travelers who are incorrectly deemed to be untruthful. 117:
In a detailed review of the history and research involving the Silent Talker and other polygraph results, Jake Bittle has written that there is danger in using a technical device to ascertain whether a psychological process is being correctly evaluated. This danger can be amplified if the device is
82:
article, Arash Emamzadeh writes that while there are no easy ways to detect lying, the cognitive approach may increase accuracy. Other sources give advice about what techniques people usually use to determine if a speaker is being truthful. These articles focus on non-verbal behavior of the speaker
63:
Polygraphs are used under the hypothesis that most people do not lie or deceive without some feelings of anxiety or nervousness. This stems from the idea that most people either feel bad that they are lying or are afraid that they will get caught or will be in trouble if they lie. It is this fear
86:
Microexpressions are an example of body language that is both often unconscious and not usually something that the examiner would be able to notice. The Silent Talker system adds a camera to the usual polygraph to catch these microexpressions so that they can be analyzed as part of the analysis of
31:
by adding a camera to the process. The creators claim that microexpressions are actual indicators of lying, while many other things could cause an emotional response. Since microexpressions are fleeting, the camera allows the examiner to capture data that otherwise would have been missed. However,
121:
Since the test results can easily be incorrect, they are rarely admissible in court. If the lawyers wish to have the results included in a trial, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued standards for admissibility of scientific tests that must be submitted before a judge makes the decision. However the
113:
reports that the accuracy of polygraph results from 57 studies was "far from satisfactory." There are many examples of how the devices do not work because the physiological response being measured may be a result of the stress of the situation or conversely the actually guilty person may not
383: 114:
experience these reactions. In one example, there was an effective detector of actual lies. It was a photocopier that spit out preprinted pages saying "He's lying" that was able to elicit confessions when the guilty person believed the system worked.
67:
Polygraph examination results are not generally court admissible because they are considered fundamentally unreliable and there is a fear that jurors would, without question, believe all results of a polygraph."
27:, which does not directly measure whether the subject is truthful, but records physiological measures that are associated with emotional responses. The Silent Talker gives the evaluator access to viewing 118:
able to make more human-like conclusions as is the case with AI. There are many anecdotes about failures of the system which has never be able to achieve better than an 80% rate of success.
279: 105:
to make its decisions about travelersโ€™ honesty," and that "The technology is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what humans do when being truthful and deceptive."
330: 356: 53: 421: 227: 204: 307: 416: 32:
the scientific community is not convinced that this system accomplishes what it claims and some call it
146: 45: 308:"WE TESTED EUROPE'S NEW LIE DETECTOR FOR TRAVELERS โ€” AND IMMEDIATELY TRIGGERED A FALSE POSITIVE" 411: 101:
stated that "some academics are questioning the value of the system, which they say relies on
125:
An analysis of the use of the silent talker being used for border crossings was completed by
48:
in the form of microexpression while a subject is being interviewed, and is marketed as a
8: 172:"Silent talker: A new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception" 171: 253: 183: 78: 28: 405: 102: 97: 57: 33: 170:
Rothwell, Janet; Bandar, Zuhair; O'Shea, James; McLean, David (2006-09-01).
23:
is an attempt to increase the accuracy of the most common lie detector, the
331:"The race to create a perfect lie detector โ€“ and the dangers of succeeding" 109: 357:"Lie detectors have always been suspect. AI has made the problem worse" 188: 49: 24: 44:
The Silent Talker is a camera system which observes and analyzes
52:. Silent Talker was invented between 2000 and 2002 by a team at 169: 56:. The system claims to avoid numerous problems with previous 122:
polygraph is commonly used in police investigations.
90: 403: 60:devices by using an artificial neural network. 147:"BBC - Radio 4 - The Material World 30/1/2003" 251: 83:with an emphasis on unconscious behaviors. 301: 299: 297: 187: 384:"Are Lie Detectors Admissible in Court?" 305: 294: 245: 202: 196: 375: 328: 322: 404: 225: 163: 381: 271: 219: 348: 252:Griffin, Trudi; Tieperman, Janice. 13: 354: 329:Katwala, Amit (5 September 2019). 207:. Natalee Holloway Resource Center 139: 54:Manchester Metropolitan University 14: 433: 277: 254:"How To Know If Someone Is Lying" 382:Katz, Deanne (16 January 2013). 71: 39: 306:Gallager, Ryan (26 July 2019). 50:tool for credibility assessment 91:Scientific and legal criticism 1: 132: 176:Applied Cognitive Psychology 7: 16:Camera added to a polygraph 10: 438: 21:Silent Talker Lie Detector 422:Nonverbal communication 46:nonverbal communication 205:"What is a polygraph?" 361:MIT technology Review 228:"How To Detect Lies" 280:"Micro Expressions" 95:A 2019 article for 417:Facial expressions 282:. Paul Ekman Group 226:Emamzadeh, Arash. 429: 396: 395: 393: 391: 379: 373: 372: 370: 368: 352: 346: 345: 343: 341: 326: 320: 319: 317: 315: 303: 292: 291: 289: 287: 275: 269: 268: 266: 264: 249: 243: 242: 240: 238: 232:Psychology Today 223: 217: 216: 214: 212: 200: 194: 193: 191: 189:10.1002/acp.1204 167: 161: 160: 158: 157: 143: 79:Psychology Today 29:microexpressions 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 428: 427: 426: 402: 401: 400: 399: 389: 387: 380: 376: 366: 364: 353: 349: 339: 337: 327: 323: 313: 311: 310:. The Intercept 304: 295: 285: 283: 276: 272: 262: 260: 250: 246: 236: 234: 224: 220: 210: 208: 201: 197: 168: 164: 155: 153: 145: 144: 140: 135: 93: 74: 42: 17: 12: 11: 5: 435: 425: 424: 419: 414: 398: 397: 374: 355:Bittle, Jake. 347: 321: 293: 270: 244: 218: 203:Crime Museum. 195: 182:(6): 757โ€“777. 162: 137: 136: 134: 131: 92: 89: 73: 70: 41: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 434: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 412:Lie detection 410: 409: 407: 385: 378: 362: 358: 351: 336: 332: 325: 309: 302: 300: 298: 281: 278:Ekman, Paul. 274: 259: 255: 248: 233: 229: 222: 206: 199: 190: 185: 181: 177: 173: 166: 152: 151:www.bbc.co.uk 148: 142: 138: 130: 128: 127:The Intercept 123: 119: 115: 112: 111: 106: 104: 103:pseudoscience 100: 99: 98:The Intercept 88: 84: 81: 80: 72:Unreliability 69: 65: 61: 59: 58:lie detection 55: 51: 47: 40:Functionality 37: 35: 34:pseudoscience 30: 26: 22: 388:. Retrieved 377: 365:. Retrieved 360: 350: 338:. Retrieved 335:The Guardian 334: 324: 312:. Retrieved 284:. Retrieved 273: 261:. Retrieved 257: 247: 235:. Retrieved 231: 221: 209:. Retrieved 198: 179: 175: 165: 154:. Retrieved 150: 141: 126: 124: 120: 116: 110:The Guardian 108: 107: 96: 94: 85: 77: 75: 66: 62: 43: 20: 18: 390:10 February 367:10 February 340:10 February 314:18 February 286:10 February 263:10 February 406:Categories 386:. Find Law 237:7 February 211:7 February 156:2022-04-19 133:References 25:polygraph 258:Wiki How 363:. MIT 76:In a 392:2023 369:2023 342:2023 316:2023 288:2023 265:2023 239:2023 213:2023 19:The 184:doi 408:: 359:. 333:. 296:^ 256:. 230:. 180:20 178:. 174:. 149:. 36:. 394:. 371:. 344:. 318:. 290:. 267:. 241:. 215:. 192:. 186:: 159:.

Index

polygraph
microexpressions
pseudoscience
nonverbal communication
tool for credibility assessment
Manchester Metropolitan University
lie detection
Psychology Today
The Intercept
pseudoscience
The Guardian
"BBC - Radio 4 - The Material World 30/1/2003"
"Silent talker: A new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception"
doi
10.1002/acp.1204
"What is a polygraph?"
"How To Detect Lies"
"How To Know If Someone Is Lying"
"Micro Expressions"



"WE TESTED EUROPE'S NEW LIE DETECTOR FOR TRAVELERS โ€” AND IMMEDIATELY TRIGGERED A FALSE POSITIVE"
"The race to create a perfect lie detector โ€“ and the dangers of succeeding"
"Lie detectors have always been suspect. AI has made the problem worse"
"Are Lie Detectors Admissible in Court?"
Categories
Lie detection
Facial expressions
Nonverbal communication

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘