556:
equaled
Browning M1917, light machine gun equaled Browning M1919A4 and BAR equaled automatic rifle or machine rifle. A true light machine gun could however in my opinion, not be categorised as a GPMG. In my opinion a true GPMG needs the following: 1. Full calibre, full energy rifle rounds; like the 7.62mmx51mm and 7.62mmx54mmR. 2. Be belt fed. 3. Be capable of being used both on a bipod in the light role and on a tripod or on/in vehicles, helicopters etc in the sustained fire role. Furthermore, it being possible to rapidly change from bipod use to tripod use and vice versa. 4. Have a quick-change barrel. The Bren's service with the UK armed forces overlapped with that of the L7 GPMG and the Bren was always referred to as a LMG. In my opinion a Bren could not be described as a GPMG, because it is magazine fed and therefore could not provide the volume of fire and uninterrupted fire necessary for the sustained fire role on a tripod or on/in vehicles. In the case of small calibre MG's like the 5.56mm Minimi, because their calibre is unsuitable for the long distance fire required for the sustained fire role on a tripod or on/in vehicles. Therefore Bren and 5.56mm Minimi type machine guns, are usually not referred to as GPMG's. In my opinion, true medium machine guns are for example the Goryunnov SG-43/SGM, Browning M1919A4 and Vickers MK I. A rifle calibre machine gun (i.e for example 7.62mmx54mmR, .303in) designed for use on a tripod or on/in vehicles in the sustained fire role and cannot be used on a bipod. The BAR could never be categorised as a GPMG. It is magazine fed, lacks a quick-change barrel and could not be used on a tripod.
254:
238:
22:
303:
123:
282:
195:
184:
173:
81:
53:
162:
151:
629:
Army in response to the "German MG34 and MG42 machine guns they were facing". Contrast this with all of the other weapons on the list which were specifically designed to be used both as LMGs and MMGs. As a minimum the inclusion of the M1919 should contain a qualifier. Otherwise we might also include the MG 08/18 version of the Maxim
650:
Strongly agree. Including the M1919 will only tend to confuse the reader. Indeed, the M1919 could just as easily be at the top of a list of examples of machine guns that are NOT GPMGs. The appearance of the M1919A6, a belated attempt to GMPG-ize the M1919 notwithstanding, it is hard to think of a
628:
fits well with the other "notable examples". While the M1919A6 version could be used as a light machine gun (LMG), it was a much later conversion, and in all other aspects the M1919 is a 'pure' medium machine gun (MMG). The Wiki article on the M1919 describes the A6 as a "stopgap measure" by the US
533:
I agree that it is co-incident that most weapons referred to as GPMGs are MMGs. Not all MMGs are GPMGs. The two major historical GPMG-style weapons are the MG38/42 and BAR, both with their own inherent differences in make and use. I doubt the BAR would ever be referred as an MMG. FWIW GPMG is from
555:
The term MMG was used by the UK, long before the USA. For example the
Vickers MK I: i.e. a rifle calibre machine gun, designed to be used on a tripod in the sustained fire role and not on a bipod. In the past the USA had these terms: Large caliber machine gun equaled M2 Browning, heavy machine gun
591:
Article says "In the late 1956, the
Canadian military adopted the FN MAG as the C6A1 GPMG along with the purchase of the FNC1 and FNC2's". The Canadians were still using the Browning M1919A4 as late as the mid 1980's. When the Leopard C1 tanks came into service I believe they came with the FN-MAG
382:
GPMG does not refer specifically to the MAG-58 / L7A1; it can refer to any machine gun that is designed to be able to fulfill the roles of either light machine gun or medium machine gun. Apart from the MAG-58 which fills that role in the
British Army, other well known GPMG's include the
494:
You have a good point but i dont think its right though. Any machine gun could really be a general purpose machine gun. That fact that most Medium machine guns are general purpose machine is just coincident. A light machine gun could be a gneral purpose machine gun also.
450:"Firing from the Hip" is both taught in several armies as well as a more correct description of the technique, since one doesnt have to be "on the move" to fire from the hip. Just because "Arnie" or "Rambo" fires from the hip, that should not influence technical language.
808:
Is it wise to focus almost solely on german WWII GPMGs as the main and pretty much only GPMGs during the war? It seems (to me at least) that this gives undue weight to the Nazis, and presents them almost as a
Wunderwaffe akin to how the StG 44 was the first
517:
Tom
Anderson, I'm not sure where the term GPMG geographically originated, but I am American, and I am familiar with the term, specifically as it refers to a weapon that is designed to fulfill the roles of both an LMG and a MMG, such as the MG42 or
453:
It seems inaccurate to describe the MK48 as a GPMG, as it is narrowly a .308 adaptation of the MK46, which is a
Special Forces weapon therefore used as a small arm by an individual; as opposed to being crew-served and vehicle-mountable
405:
A full article should discuss the origin of the idea of the GPMG, its tactical role, and why many modern armies are moving away from it back to a LMG/SFMG doctrine. I might do it in a couple of weeks but I am flat out at the moment.
245:
63:
651:.30 cal post-WWI belt-fed machine gun that is less like a GPMG than the M1919. It should be taken off the "notable example" list or, at the dead minimum, the M1919A6 model should be the only variant listed.
619:
841:
846:
734:
409:
Concerning an article on the MAG-58, it should probably also mention the large number of countries who have adopted it. Also the cyclic rate is actually variable. -- Roger 13 Aug 2003
645:
752:
748:
580:
261:
67:
136:
439:
497:
413:
357:
666:
484:
Isn't MMG pretty much synonymous with GPMG these days? If so, the pages should be merged. If not, notes should be added about how they're different.
93:
527:
549:
822:
510:
836:
565:
122:
798:
612:
866:
576:
347:
712:
871:
861:
851:
422:
The "hip firing" reference is rather 'Arnie' or 'Rambo', isn't it. For a more encyclopedic tone I suggest 'while on the move'.
88:
58:
856:
803:
475:
469:
97:
442:
572:
461:
416:
323:
658:
541:
319:
586:
447:
Hip firing is something that is rarely ever employed except for when firing light machine guns or GPMGS on the move.
675:
751:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
402:- Yes, by the very soldiers that use the FN MAG ;) Any soldier will love theirs best (unless its an early M60)
430:
I think hip firing is possible only with weapons up to light machine guns. After that it's simply unfeasible.
310:
287:
608:
92:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
487:
My hunch is that GPMG is a
British/Commonwealth term, and MMG is a USAian term, although i could be wrong.
33:
818:
684:
770:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
625:
465:
318:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
438:
I would like to request that an image be uploaded to this page. Actually I may do that myself now--
662:
545:
21:
755:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
814:
771:
790:
758:
716:
713:
https://web.archive.org/20130226162750/http://army.mod.uk/equipment/support-weapons/1463.aspx
592:
designated as the C6. The FN-MAG replaced the
Browning about the time the FNs were retired.
39:
778:
654:
596:
537:
457:
412:
The absolute best should be the one that originated the concept. In other words, the MG42.
8:
561:
737:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
641:
523:
477:
423:
777:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
694:
604:
786:
377:
702:
688:
384:
557:
743:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
399:. (However it is widely accpeted that the MAG 58 is the best GPMG ever made!)
830:
637:
519:
813:
assault rifle, but not solely the basis for every subsequent assault rifle.
253:
600:
431:
534:
the french, but made popular by the British standardisation of the term.
744:
699:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
571:
The Russian term for GPMG this is единый, meaning unified or universal.
237:
315:
707:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
302:
281:
842:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
630:
620:
Problematic to have the M1919 Browning as a "notable example"
847:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
722:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
392:
717:
http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/support-weapons/1463.aspx
80:
52:
396:
388:
683:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
314:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
134:
This article has been checked against the following
747:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
246:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
828:
733:This message was posted before February 2018.
19:
86:This article is within the scope of the
829:
106:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
96:. To use this banner, please see the
837:Start-Class military history articles
490:-- Tom Anderson 2008-01-28 1819 +000
109:Template:WikiProject Military history
308:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
804:POV and Focus on German WWII GPMGs
252:
236:
121:
14:
883:
687:. Please take a moment to review
867:Low-importance Firearms articles
301:
280:
193:
182:
171:
160:
149:
79:
51:
20:
573:Someone not using his real name
352:This article has been rated as
332:Knowledge:WikiProject Firearms
1:
872:WikiProject Firearms articles
862:Start-Class Firearms articles
852:Start-Class weaponry articles
823:18:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
667:08:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
470:18:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
417:15:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
335:Template:WikiProject Firearms
857:Weaponry task force articles
550:03:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
528:21:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
511:19:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
89:Military history WikiProject
7:
799:06:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
685:General-purpose machine gun
646:08:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
581:21:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
443:18:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
10:
888:
764:(last update: 5 June 2024)
705:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
680:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
626:M1919 Browning machine gun
613:23:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
587:FN-MAG in Canadian Service
566:21:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
358:project's importance scale
154:Referencing and citation:
426:16:14, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
351:
296:
260:
244:
219:
215:
133:
112:military history articles
74:
46:
633:as a "notable example".
434:20:46, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
676:External links modified
624:I don't think that the
220:Associated task forces:
165:Coverage and accuracy:
257:
241:
198:Supporting materials:
126:
28:This article is rated
391:(and once the famous
256:
240:
125:
745:regular verification
730:to let others know.
691:. If necessary, add
311:WikiProject Firearms
735:After February 2018
726:parameter below to
395:), and the Russian
262:Weaponry task force
187:Grammar and style:
140:for B-class status:
740:InternetArchiveBot
478:Medium Machine Gun
322:and see a list of
258:
242:
127:
94:list of open tasks
34:content assessment
815:ShamblingShoggoth
797:
765:
657:comment added by
616:
599:comment added by
540:comment added by
472:
460:comment added by
372:
371:
368:
367:
364:
363:
338:Firearms articles
275:
274:
271:
270:
267:
266:
211:
210:
167:criterion not met
156:criterion not met
98:full instructions
879:
793:
792:Talk to my owner
788:
763:
762:
741:
706:
698:
669:
615:
593:
552:
509:
506:
502:
455:
340:
339:
336:
333:
330:
305:
298:
297:
292:
284:
277:
276:
227:
217:
216:
201:
197:
196:
190:
186:
185:
179:
175:
174:
168:
164:
163:
157:
153:
152:
131:
130:
114:
113:
110:
107:
104:
103:Military history
83:
76:
75:
70:
59:Military history
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
887:
886:
882:
881:
880:
878:
877:
876:
827:
826:
806:
796:
791:
756:
749:have permission
739:
700:
692:
678:
652:
622:
594:
589:
535:
504:
498:
496:
482:
403:
380:
337:
334:
331:
328:
327:
290:
225:
199:
194:
188:
183:
177:
172:
166:
161:
155:
150:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
885:
875:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
805:
802:
789:
783:
782:
775:
720:
719:
711:Added archive
677:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
621:
618:
588:
585:
584:
583:
531:
530:
514:
513:
481:
474:
462:50.203.251.142
436:
435:
420:
401:
379:
376:
374:
370:
369:
366:
365:
362:
361:
354:Low-importance
350:
344:
343:
341:
306:
294:
293:
291:Low‑importance
285:
273:
272:
269:
268:
265:
264:
259:
249:
248:
243:
233:
232:
230:
228:
222:
221:
213:
212:
209:
208:
206:
204:
203:
202:
191:
180:
169:
158:
144:
143:
141:
128:
118:
117:
115:
84:
72:
71:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
884:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
834:
832:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
801:
800:
794:
787:
780:
776:
773:
769:
768:
767:
760:
754:
750:
746:
742:
736:
731:
729:
725:
718:
714:
710:
709:
708:
704:
696:
690:
686:
681:
668:
664:
660:
659:69.205.156.83
656:
649:
648:
647:
643:
639:
636:
635:
634:
632:
627:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
567:
563:
559:
553:
551:
547:
543:
542:203.9.185.137
539:
529:
525:
521:
516:
515:
512:
508:
507:
501:
493:
492:
491:
488:
485:
479:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
451:
448:
445:
444:
441:
440:131.111.8.103
433:
429:
428:
427:
425:
424:GraemeLeggett
419:
418:
415:
410:
407:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
375:
359:
355:
349:
346:
345:
342:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
307:
304:
300:
299:
295:
289:
286:
283:
279:
278:
263:
255:
251:
250:
247:
239:
235:
234:
231:
229:
224:
223:
218:
214:
207:
205:
200:criterion met
192:
189:criterion met
181:
178:criterion met
170:
159:
148:
147:
146:
145:
142:
139:
138:
132:
129:
124:
120:
119:
116:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
810:
807:
784:
759:source check
738:
732:
727:
723:
721:
682:
679:
653:— Preceding
623:
590:
554:
532:
503:
499:
489:
486:
483:
456:— Preceding
452:
449:
446:
437:
421:
414:209.221.73.5
411:
408:
404:
381:
373:
353:
309:
135:
87:
40:WikiProjects
595:—Preceding
536:—Preceding
176:Structure:
30:Start-class
831:Categories
811:successful
476:Same as a
324:open tasks
320:discussion
64:Technology
785:Cheers. —
779:this tool
772:this tool
558:Sulasgeir
387:, German
695:cbignore
655:unsigned
638:Mojowiha
609:contribs
597:unsigned
538:unsigned
520:Cbmclean
458:unsigned
378:Untitled
329:Firearms
316:firearms
288:Firearms
137:criteria
68:Weaponry
795::Online
724:checked
689:my edit
601:Ibm1130
505:Brigade
432:Oberiko
356:on the
703:nobots
36:scale.
631:MG 08
500:Bones
819:talk
728:true
663:talk
642:talk
605:talk
577:talk
562:talk
546:talk
524:talk
518:M60.
466:talk
393:MG42
753:RfC
715:to
397:PKM
389:MG3
385:M60
348:Low
833::
821:)
766:.
761:}}
757:{{
701:{{
697:}}
693:{{
665:)
644:)
611:)
607:•
579:)
564:)
548:)
526:)
468:)
226:/
66:/
62::
817:(
781:.
774:.
661:(
640:(
603:(
575:(
560:(
544:(
522:(
480:?
464:(
360:.
326:.
100:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
