349:
339:
321:
285:
191:
233:
247:
222:
529:
My source is the B.I.O.S. Final Report 1264,"Wagner
Natural Circulation Boilers" which was puiblished by the British Intelligence Objectives Sub-committee in 1945 after investigating the "Wagner-Hochdruck-Dampfturbinen-KG" in Hamburg. Furthermore you can take a look on the B.I.O.S. Final Report
423:
I have used the material I could find in the last weeks regarding the history and advantages and disadvantages of the article. However I could only update the history section today with the proper references. Other users and experts comments are welcome .
530:
382,"La Mont
Boilers in Germany (for Naval and Mercantile use)" where all ships are mentioned, which were steamed by a La Mont boiler - and not suprisingly, there is no a single word about the use of a La Mont boiler on the Bismarck.
153:
536:
To reference to "THE FORGOTTEN LAMONT BOILER" by George Nutz is totally useless. Nutz
Article on La Mont Boiler does not mention any relialbe source for his claim that the Bismarck used La Mont boilers.
443:
Mark Benson lived until 1950s, so he could't had an idea in 1856. "Lamont was a Navy
Lieutenant Commander and an engineer in the US marines as well as a patriot" doesn't matter for an encyclopedia.--
258:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
499:
Do you have good sourcing for what the
Bismarck did have? That's obviously better than simply removing the source that was here, even though it's not the most convincing source.
557:
479:
448:
147:
553:
475:
444:
401:
533:
The difference between La Mont and Wagner is that the La Mont-System is a forced circulation system while the Wagne-System is a natural circulation.
510:
to high pressure boilers, at least on railways. Is a Wagner a forced circulation boiler, and so could the "Bismarck used LaMont boilers" claim be a
465:
there is no historical evidence, that La Mont-Boilers were used on the
Bismarck - it's a myth. This battleship used 12 Wagner-Highpressure boilers.
600:
395:
585:
523:
259:
254:
227:
79:
605:
595:
561:
483:
371:
85:
44:
540:
And finally - the correct spelling of LaMont Boiler is La Mont Boiler (like the spelling in the B.I.O.S. Final Report 382)
168:
135:
30:
590:
580:
362:
326:
565:
487:
303:
433:
99:
129:
104:
20:
452:
74:
232:
202:
125:
65:
175:
370:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
418:
190:
109:
519:
208:
549:
471:
297:
141:
8:
503:
429:
55:
457:
354:
70:
515:
51:
161:
293:
438:
425:
574:
24:
367:
348:
502:
Can you explain what a Wagner boiler was? The only Wagner I know is
338:
320:
284:
246:
221:
292:
This article was accepted on 18 April 2013 by reviewer
160:
366:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
344:
15:
400:This article has not yet received a rating on the
572:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
268:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation
188:
271:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation
252:This article was reviewed by member(s) of
601:Unknown-importance Engineering articles
573:
504:Wagner the railway locomotive engineer
586:AfC submissions by date/18 April 2013
360:This article is within the scope of
184:
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
283:
14:
617:
380:Knowledge:WikiProject Engineering
255:WikiProject Articles for creation
606:WikiProject Engineering articles
596:Start-Class Engineering articles
383:Template:WikiProject Engineering
347:
337:
319:
245:
231:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1:
453:16:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
374:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
494:OK, thanks for raising that.
7:
566:09:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
622:
434:10:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
402:project's importance scale
524:15:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
488:14:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
399:
332:
291:
240:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
591:Accepted AfC submissions
581:Start-Class AfC articles
514:over two similar types?
506:, who was noted for his
363:WikiProject Engineering
288:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
546:I hope that this ar
287:
265:Articles for creation
262:for more information.
228:Articles for creation
100:Neutral point of view
386:Engineering articles
105:No original research
355:Engineering portal
289:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
568:
552:comment added by
490:
474:comment added by
416:
415:
412:
411:
408:
407:
314:
313:
310:
309:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
613:
554:HieronAlexandria
547:
476:HieronAlexandria
469:
388:
387:
384:
381:
378:
357:
352:
351:
341:
334:
333:
323:
316:
315:
276:
275:
272:
269:
266:
249:
242:
241:
236:
235:
234:
224:
217:
216:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
621:
620:
616:
615:
614:
612:
611:
610:
571:
570:
460:
445:Power Plant Fan
441:
421:
419:History updated
385:
382:
379:
376:
375:
353:
346:
273:
270:
267:
264:
263:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
619:
609:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
527:
526:
500:
496:
495:
459:
456:
440:
437:
420:
417:
414:
413:
410:
409:
406:
405:
398:
392:
391:
389:
372:the discussion
359:
358:
342:
330:
329:
324:
312:
311:
308:
307:
290:
280:
279:
277:
250:
238:
237:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
618:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
578:
576:
569:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
544:
541:
538:
534:
531:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
497:
493:
492:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
466:
463:
455:
454:
450:
446:
436:
435:
431:
427:
403:
397:
394:
393:
390:
373:
369:
365:
364:
356:
350:
345:
343:
340:
336:
335:
331:
328:
325:
322:
318:
317:
305:
302:
299:
295:
286:
282:
281:
278:
261:
257:
256:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
229:
226:
223:
219:
218:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
25:LaMont boiler
22:
18:
17:
548:— Preceding
545:
542:
539:
535:
532:
528:
516:Andy Dingley
511:
507:
470:— Preceding
467:
464:
461:
442:
422:
361:
300:
274:AfC articles
260:project page
253:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
377:Engineering
368:engineering
327:Engineering
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
575:Categories
508:opposition
458:Bismarck?!
294:Joe Decker
512:confusion
468:Cheers.
426:Ghorpaapi
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
562:contribs
550:unsigned
543:Cheers!
484:contribs
472:unsigned
304:contribs
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
462:Hello,
154:WP refs
142:scholar
439:Issues
205:scale.
126:Google
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
558:talk
520:talk
480:talk
449:talk
430:talk
298:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
396:???
176:TWL
577::
564:)
560:•
522:)
486:)
482:•
451:)
432:)
306:).
156:)
54:;
556:(
518:(
478:(
447:(
428:(
404:.
301:·
296:(
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
