170:
perceived task.i.e are you in this for yourselves or others?Why have such rash decisions been made regarding important issues of pay and condiitions?Why are you so intent on agreeing the imposition of the Postal
Services Bill and all this may result in such as the closure of more offices and the loss of 1000's of jobs and the disintegration of communities.Who are you working for in all honesty ?Why is there currently a massive chasm in your ranks?Whos is paying the piper (125K we hear)?Hang your heads in shame and resign en mass bring in new blood, new hopes, new beginnings.Go and go now.Discuss.
67:
49:
77:
22:
169:
Oh what a tangled web we weave ....National
Federation of Subpostmasters you need to look very hard at yourselves to seek an answer to these questions.Are you really wholly looking out for the best interests of subpostmasters? At times the responsibility of an office such as this is greater than the
211:
Surely there should be a controversy section telling readers about the allegation that the
National Federation of SubPostmasters failed in its duty to assist subpostmasters wrongly accused of criminal behaviour instead toeing the Post Offic line that Horizon was not at fault when in fact it was as
189:
The organization was, at one time a registered labor union. That is not the case at the moment. However, the use of the infobox for unions leaves the impression that the organization is defunct, when in fact it is active. I am changing the infobox to the organization infobox to reflect the current
221:
206:
175:
137:
171:
263:
236:
131:
201:
268:
232:
258:
179:
107:
244:
212:
has been proven by the successful legal action against the Post Office brought by
Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance?
90:
54:
29:
184:
106:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
35:
196:
8:
240:
217:
190:
status, and will look into explaining the history as respects the status as union.--
102:
82:
191:
252:
213:
66:
48:
226:
96:
154:
94:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
72:
28:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
136:This article has not yet received a rating on the
250:
233:Talk:British Post Office scandal#Sub-postmasters
207:Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance legal action
21:
19:
251:
264:Unknown-importance Philately articles
88:This article is within the scope of
15:
34:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
280:
75:
65:
47:
20:
269:All WikiProject Philately pages
116:Knowledge:WikiProject Philately
119:Template:WikiProject Philately
1:
259:Unassessed Philately articles
231:Please see the discussion at
180:14:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
110:and see a list of open tasks.
245:15:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
7:
10:
285:
138:project's importance scale
135:
60:
42:
222:22:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
202:16:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
91:WikiProject Philately
185:Change to info box
122:Philately articles
30:content assessment
152:
151:
148:
147:
144:
143:
276:
199:
194:
166:
165:
161:
124:
123:
120:
117:
114:
103:stamp collecting
85:
83:Philately portal
80:
79:
78:
69:
62:
61:
51:
44:
43:
25:
24:
23:
16:
284:
283:
279:
278:
277:
275:
274:
273:
249:
248:
229:
209:
197:
192:
187:
167:
163:
159:
157:
156:
121:
118:
115:
112:
111:
81:
76:
74:
12:
11:
5:
282:
272:
271:
266:
261:
228:
225:
208:
205:
186:
183:
155:
153:
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
134:
128:
127:
125:
108:the discussion
87:
86:
70:
58:
57:
52:
40:
39:
33:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
281:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
256:
254:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
224:
223:
219:
215:
204:
203:
200:
195:
182:
181:
177:
173:
162:
139:
133:
130:
129:
126:
109:
105:
104:
99:
98:
93:
92:
84:
73:
71:
68:
64:
63:
59:
56:
53:
50:
46:
45:
41:
37:
31:
27:
18:
17:
230:
210:
188:
168:
101:
95:
89:
36:WikiProjects
193:S Philbrick
253:Categories
172:Royalmail1
113:Philately
97:philately
55:Philately
227:Spelling
237:DeFacto
214:Richwil
198:(Talk)
158:": -->
32:scale.
235:. --
241:talk
218:talk
176:talk
160:edit
100:and
243:).
132:???
255::
220:)
178:)
239:(
216:(
174:(
164:]
140:.
38::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
