22:
189:
165:
137:
199:
77:
53:
87:
247:
509:
CPI is concerned whose position is only in three states certainly doesn't get a national tag not at all. You said CPI do got a chance but was declined its quite natural that they aren't capable to rule. My dear friend its quite evident that INC & BJP influence is far more than an other party despite India being a multi party system.--
552:-Look Knowledge is a place of scholary importance, SCHOOL GOING KIDS, uses its content for their projects or so. If kkm010 is introducing his POV then he has some reason behind it. To confuse the people. ECI is a autonomous body of Government of India, Even it did not discriminate among National Parties on
384:
The reason is that the parties except INC & BJP, all the other regional parties have there influence in two to three states but national parties such as INC & BJP do dominate almost all states or their influence is whole nation. Which is why i think they must be separated, you certainly can't
348:
Now that the 2009 general election can be considered completed, I suggest that the Third Front be moved to "Former
National coalitions". I believe this should be done since some parties in this front either have joined UPA or are supporting the UPA. Neither have the Third Front leaders have made any
508:
I do agree with you India is multi party system. But like i said if you can show a party apart from INC & BJP who has ruled in India for total 5 years and there presence is in every Indian states then i would refrain from rv ur edits. BJP in this case do have ruled for total 5 years. And far as
419:
I have to agree with
Viplovecomm here. There are three different formal categories in the ECI registration. The main reason why to use these categories is that it becomes less arbitrary. India currently has seven national political parties, and there is no reason to say that the 'national parties'
591:
The template for political parties and not specifically for Indian political parties has a good representation of numbers that a party holds in the equivalents of India's Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Can a similar indicator be added to this template specifically for Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha?
493:
In what sense is that a relevant criteria? BJP had a gov't that lasted 13 days, did that make it less of a national party? There are major parties in many countries that never took part in government. CPI(M), for example, was offered the prime ministerial post, but declined. As for size of
440:
Look like I said earlier a party whose influence is across the nation and who has ruled, now in India only two party have ruled successfully so far one is INC & BJP. Not a single party so has been able to ruled so successfully. I really don't think so its worth putting them in same
279:
Why are the recognised national parties split up between "Major
Recognized national parties" & "Other recognized national parties". Since the ECI only classifies them together as "Recognized national parties", perhaps it should be the same way in this template as well? Any
494:
electorate, INC obtained 28.55% of the votes in 2009, BJP 18.8%, BSP 6.17%. NCP, 2.04%, etc. The fact of the matter is that India does not have a two-party system and that massive national coalitions (1996 style) have become a permanent feature of Indian politics. --
522:
Learn to separate between CPI(M) and CPI. And CPI(M) is not limited to three states, they are active in all states except
Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. In several states outside the ones they govern, they do have a notable influence.
349:
mention about the Front still existing, nor have they been seen on a common platform since the day results were declared. If this front is rejuvenated at anytime in the future, they can be moved again. Any thoughts?--
480:
My dear friend slight wrong info they fail to rule total 5 years mandate eventually it brokeup. which INC & BJP done successfully. No party can match them they dominate the whole India.--
319:- I agree with soman and Aditya Krishnan. This wikipedia template seems to violating ECI norms. This portion "major national parties" seems to contradictory to wikipedia's own article on
576:
398:-This seems to be your opinion kkm, Election Commission of India, dont think so. And it yet not demarcated any national political party, on grounds of "MAJOR" or "MINOR".
601:
626:
323:& the official . Hence the editorial majority here seems to against it, so as per the norms of GENERAL CONSENSUS, I am modifying it to its previous status.
309:
449:
429:
661:
631:
256:
175:
666:
636:
532:
517:
503:
488:
463:
671:
294:
641:
320:
368:-I've moved it to former national coalitions, but if it will be rejuvenated again, we have to move it again to current national coalitions.
363:
338:
651:
656:
571:
411:
379:
359:
290:
676:
616:
400:
Plz. refrain from playing with official status report, this is against the law of India, and the guidelines issued by the ECI.
393:
621:
146:
63:
646:
420:
category is too large to be easily manageable. CPI(M), RJD and BSP are by no means 'minor' parties in Indian politics. --
221:
355:
286:
212:
170:
454:
Wrong, you forget about 1996-1998. Other national parties are also crucial when it comes to govt formation. --
33:
110:
100:
58:
274:
220:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
351:
282:
385:
compare SP, RJD or CPI with INC and BJP. There dominance is far more than any other parties.--
567:
407:
375:
334:
39:
8:
343:
597:
586:
563:
515:
486:
447:
403:
391:
371:
330:
528:
499:
459:
425:
305:
204:
610:
593:
582:
92:
510:
481:
442:
386:
198:
188:
164:
136:
524:
495:
455:
421:
301:
560:
line. KKM010 is forcing his pov, and disrespecting the other editors.
108:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
217:
76:
52:
105:
246:
325:
Please discuss on this talk page first before reverting.
577:
Indicate Party strength in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha
216:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
194:
82:
608:
104:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
627:Template-Class India articles of NA-importance
581:Apologies. This request does not belong here.
321:List of recognised political parties in India
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
662:Template-Class political party articles
632:Template-Class Indian politics articles
667:NA-importance political party articles
637:NA-importance Indian politics articles
609:
672:Political parties task force articles
210:This template is within the scope of
98:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
642:WikiProject Indian politics articles
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
245:
135:
14:
688:
652:Template-Class politics articles
197:
187:
163:
85:
75:
51:
20:
657:NA-importance politics articles
254:This template is supported by
230:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
144:This template is supported by
1:
677:WikiProject Politics articles
617:Template-Class India articles
589:) 05:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
233:Template:WikiProject Politics
224:and see a list of open tasks.
147:the Indian politics workgroup
622:NA-importance India articles
364:10:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
310:09:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
295:09:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
257:Political parties task force
7:
120:Knowledge:WikiProject India
10:
693:
647:WikiProject India articles
602:05:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
123:Template:WikiProject India
572:11:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
533:05:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
518:05:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
504:15:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
489:14:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
464:12:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
450:10:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
430:20:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
412:20:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
394:14:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
380:08:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
339:08:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
253:
182:
143:
70:
46:
250:
140:
249:
139:
213:WikiProject Politics
352:Aditya.krishnan.82
283:Aditya.krishnan.82
251:
141:
34:content assessment
272:
271:
268:
267:
264:
263:
236:politics articles
176:Political parties
158:
157:
154:
153:
101:WikiProject India
684:
513:
484:
445:
389:
275:National parties
238:
237:
234:
231:
228:
207:
202:
201:
191:
184:
183:
178:
167:
160:
159:
128:
127:
124:
121:
118:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
692:
691:
687:
686:
685:
683:
682:
681:
607:
606:
579:
511:
482:
443:
387:
346:
277:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:
205:Politics portal
203:
196:
173:
125:
122:
119:
116:
115:
91:
86:
84:
61:
12:
11:
5:
690:
680:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
619:
578:
575:
561:
551:
550:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
435:
434:
433:
432:
401:
399:
397:
396:
369:
367:
366:
350:
345:
342:
328:
326:
324:
316:
315:
313:
312:
281:
276:
273:
270:
269:
266:
265:
262:
261:
252:
242:
241:
239:
222:the discussion
209:
208:
192:
180:
179:
168:
156:
155:
152:
151:
142:
132:
131:
129:
126:India articles
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
689:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
614:
612:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
588:
584:
574:
573:
569:
565:
559:
555:
534:
530:
526:
521:
520:
519:
516:
514:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
492:
491:
490:
487:
485:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
451:
448:
446:
439:
438:
437:
436:
431:
427:
423:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
409:
405:
395:
392:
390:
382:
381:
377:
373:
365:
361:
357:
353:
341:
340:
336:
332:
322:
317:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
259:
258:
248:
244:
243:
240:
223:
219:
215:
214:
206:
200:
195:
193:
190:
186:
185:
181:
177:
172:
169:
166:
162:
161:
149:
148:
138:
134:
133:
130:
113:
112:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
590:
580:
557:
553:
549:
383:
347:
318:
314:
278:
255:
211:
145:
111:project page
109:
99:
93:India portal
40:WikiProjects
29:
564:Viplovecomm
441:category.--
404:Viplovecomm
372:Viplovecomm
344:Third Front
331:Viplovecomm
300:I agree. --
611:Categories
280:thoughts?
594:Prad2609
583:Prad2609
360:contribs
327:Regards.
291:contribs
227:Politics
218:politics
171:Politics
64:Politics
30:template
558:"Minor"
554:"Major"
512:Kkm010
483:Kkm010
444:Kkm010
388:Kkm010
36:scale.
525:Soman
496:Soman
456:Soman
422:Soman
302:Soman
117:India
106:India
59:India
28:This
598:talk
587:talk
568:talk
556:and
529:talk
500:talk
460:talk
426:talk
408:talk
376:talk
356:talk
335:talk
306:talk
287:talk
613::
600:)
570:)
531:)
523:--
502:)
462:)
428:)
410:)
378:)
362:)
358:,
337:)
308:)
293:)
289:,
174::
62::
596:(
585:(
566:(
562:-
527:(
498:(
458:(
424:(
406:(
402:-
374:(
370:-
354:(
333:(
329:-
304:(
285:(
260:.
150:.
114:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
