Template talk:Regions of the world

53: 22: 71: 142: 790:– read the hatnote – and seems an unnecessary duplication; the former should redirect to the latter. Without objection, I will tweak and redirect. I also think we have to draw a line with the regions included in the template ... and wouldn't lose sleep if the Congo (and other arguably 'atomic' regions) were nixed. Perhaps it would be better to include only the (top-level) UN subregions, and or to segregate the UN subregions from others of varied definition? 3265: 3257: 3247: 1009:

optional/arguable periphery. Nonetheless, these terms are used and they mean something to the jouranlists and politicians and artists who use them, and to their audiences. (Phew, my talk is getting increasingly philosophical here). And, on the other hand, some formally designated regions or clusters of states and other entities (such as Western Asia) remain poorly used in spite of their unequivocal, unbiased and descritive nature.

826:. I also realize that there may arguably be many more such regions whose names and approximate locations and boundaries are found only in the minds of people, but that these definitions and delimitations find their way into the names used by international organizations and corporations (e.g. newspapers that in their very name convey a message about which geographical zone they intend to cover). Ideas? 81: 3569:: Bounded in the east by the Ural mountains etc. The A maps are political, and thus unsuited for this template's purpose. Plus, the Europe A map also includes Israel and Jordan, and Jordan isn't in Europe at all. The problem with Greater Europe is that there are plenty of definitions and hardly two people speaking of Greater Europe mean the same thing. 2130:. To embrace the UN classification is a little POV, I'll admit, but at least it allows users to navigate the articles with ease. In those articles they can then learn about finer POV points. I think you are no probably right that there is no need to create UN subregion articles. However I do think this template's design is a problem to be solved. 2892:

longer until we have Celtic Europe, Germanic Europe, etc (and all the conflict that will appear?). If we add to that all the other cultures (on all the other continents) I predict a very bad time for this template. IMHO we should only keep the geographical regions and simply remove all the cultural ones. Hey, I like to be honest.

2617:

person in the world knows that Mexico is in North America. If a user is looking for Central America, he or she will surely will find the info with no problems. We should list the regions as internationally known and used. The UN subdivision is not common and as stated by the UN it is used ONLY for statistical convinience.

3273:

I strongly support the Expanded map for Europe, since it is much more detailed. I however am not so struck by the alternate Asia map, since it doesn't colour all Asia one colour. The Europe one has all "core" Europe one colour, and then a lighter shade for extended Europe. The Asia one seems to imply

3188:

is more informative than the talk page. There is clearly some sockpuppetry, and suggestions of one or more banned users disrupting this template. Semi-protection is an option, though I am also considering full protection. Hopefully a discussion will follow which can clarify the problems with the maps

2758:

Exactly, I think its silly to have North and Northern America, or do you think we should include South and Southern America??, most people around the world divide the Americas/America, into 4 simple regions: North America, Central America, the Caribbean and South America, just because the UN includes

1634:

Here's an idea: The template could stay as it is now (which is fine by me), or it could be clearly divided (with a thick line!) into a "UN" section and an "other" section. But then a number of the "other" regions would more or less coincide with the UN subregions, just by a different name... Example:

2773:

I have no major problem with this template except the tacit assertion that these are THE regions of the world rather than just one classification among many. An encyclopedia, as wikipedia is supposed to be, has the potential to come across as authoritative and objective, and care should be taken, I

2483:

I'd only prune the template by shifting subregions into lists if there were a clear and consensual method to do so, but I agree that's less rather than more likely. I'm happy for the template to stay in its current form if that's where a consensus lies. I suspect any ideas on trimming the whitespace

2346:

Weighing in rather late regarding this, I don't see what the problem is with the current template: aesthetics aside (which I don't necessarily agree with), it is navigable, functional, structured, yet inclusive. How is the current template unworkable? The proposed Temp3 template, and predecessors,

1989:

I'm liking your proposal better and better by the minute! However, I disagree that entirely separate articles need to be created for the UN subregions, since these are already duly mentioned in seperate sections in their respective articles (or at least more or less duly...). But since Latin America

1825:

Re Latin America appearing twice, I think it's because it straddles North (well, Central) America and South America. Re Central America, so far as I'm aware the Americas are usually first divided into North America and South America, then into smaller regions which include Central America as part of

343:

Redirects are a useful way of accounting for 'popular' terms, but any work that purports to have encyclopedic worth needs to take a more rigorous approach. Take the use of 'America', for example, while most people do associate this with 'The United States of America', it is inaccurate on grounds of

3699:

We should have either 7 regions (Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, Polar Regions, South America), or 6 regions (Africa, Australia, Eurasia, North America, Polar Regions, and South America), or 5 regions (Africa, Americas, Australia, Eurasia, and Polar Regions). But having Americas as

2981:

Hmmm, I'm not sure if agree with that (Central Asia) but as I'm not intent in imposing my personal opinion in this matter perhaps we should use the 'Greater Europe' article instead. At least it also includes Greenland (geographically located in North America) and a few others. If you truly want to

2789:

one might argue for different regions. I suspect most of the criticisms about this template relate to people approaching it from a political or a cultural point of view, as these are perhaps the two most common ways people think about the world and its regions. Some other common ways of thinking

2699:

I am adding a link to "North America" because the UN system also divides the Americas in North and South. Commonly a person will be looking for the most used division of the Americas, this includes North America also. If a person is looking for the another UN subdivision called "Northern America",

2688:

for statistical convinience under an economic point of view. The most world-wide known educational systems divides the Americas in North, Central and South. Although "North America" includes the countries of Central America, a clarification should be made in the Article "Central America" to inform

1971:

Yes I know - slight problems, although I think the Latin America one is the most pressing. Thing is, to accommodate the UN fully we need an extra column (so that the Americas section is split) and this makes it much more untidy. Again I would suggest that sacrifices have to be made for simplicity.

1557:

I also think that the current template does attempt to address this in a balanced manner, but, as per above, I wonder about the subjectivity of inclusion/exclusion in the third category of regions. Who is to judge whether one such region is eligible for inclusion and on what grounds? In many cases

1311:

Yes: I think the current (restructured) template largely reflects this now, though I wish it was less vertically challenged and it could probably beg for some formatting improvements. I thought about italicising the informal regions, but decided against it because I wonder if another editor would

921:

I guess my main jist is this: what should be included in this template? I'd advocate for including just common and top-level geographic and geopolitical regions in the template (viz. those that can be cited and are agreeable, like the UN subregions), or stratifying them somehow. Otherwise, it'll

3117:

But those places are not Eurasian. By Central Asia being called Eurasia, you are calling those places Eurasian. Please cite sources indicating that Central Asia and Eurasia are used interchangeable. Until you do so, it is OR. If there are no cited sources in 24 hours, I will revert the edits once

2439:

Thanks for the feedback and encouragement! I don't share the feeling that the current template is bulky (though maybe some whitespace can be removed from it): the current template seems a balance between top-level regions and smaller ones without getting too detailed or oversimplifying notions.

2418:

Thinking of similar navigational templates, I feel the current template is too bulky. Taking Africa as an example, would a solution be to convert the ordinal links in the first line ("Central Africa", "Eastern Africa", etc) into links to pages such as "List of regions in Central Africa", "List of

3383:

When Maltalia says that the A maps are more detailed is he refering to the fact that those maps show country borders? Well, in maps so small in order to be in a template, I hardly believe that to be an issue. In the respective continent articles, all of that is explained and graphically shown in

943:

I've just reorganised the template according to a two-line system, where for each region X, the first line lists subregions identified by (usually primary) compass point; and the second line lists the other subregions (usually smaller than those on the first line). I think this helps prevent the

2891:

and I've been watching at this particular template. I'm afraid that many of the regions which are slowly appearing are slowly spoiling the whole template. I mean Latin Europe is at most a cultural region and not a geographical one. Then we have Latin America. Now we have Slavic Europe. How much

2616:

I do not agree with the proposed template. I think we should use the most commonly known subdivisions of the world. For example if a user is looking for North America they will not find it! Instead they will go to "Northern America" and for example Mexico is not included there, and almost every

1778:

I've been looking at the template:region and the template:continent and they seem similar enough that with a few additions to the region template, the continent template would become redundant and could be discontinued. The inspiring thought came when I saw Antarctica was a featured article and

2076:

treat this information, comparing and contrasting (if needed) with usual or common reckonings for these conceptual constructs. It's counterproductive to create article forks to house information that should reside in one spot for the benefit of users. Dedicated lists and categories should be

1922:

I like it! Note, however, that "Latin America" is used in the UN context as an intermediate grouping of three of the subregions proper; it is not a UN subregion in its own right. Also, "Australia and New Zealand" is the name of one single UN subregion covering three seperate entities. See also

2552:

Yes - is annoying people are like that isn't it! I quite like your list of subregions idea but it does create a fair amount of work before this template can be changed. Perhaps we could focus our efforts on ensuring the subregions that will be deleted from here are prominantly linked from the

1008:

I have no sources to cite right off the top of my skull. Part of this crux lies in the definition of a (sub-)region: Many of the more informal terms used in public discourse on both formal and informal levels to describe a certain area have no set boundaries; they have only a core and an

1183:

is amidst other regions of simpler title. As well, given that North and South America (continents) are almost universally known by those terms, I suggest moving subregional articles as above more for consistency and, to a lesser degree, to obviate ambiguity. Thoughts? Also, see below.

2515:(Thanks for wasting our time.) This does not make his/her arguments invalid but it does mean there is less opposition to the proposed redesign than first appears. Perhaps, indeed, it is ready to be implemented? Am I correct in thinking David Kernow and BigAdamsky support this? Cheers 3526:

I would in fact suggest possibly creating new maps entirely, which combine features of both A and B. It can still show Greater Europe etc, but be more accurate than the current map, since following the sources, some of the countries included in this map don't seem to fit with the

3202:

Right, firstly, can you just block all the IPs from editing. This is too confusing, and if they want to contribute, they can make an account so that they are identifiable. Secondly, it is Ogre who tagged the images, so using the excuse that they are "tagged" is not valid.

858:

Feelings ain't enough just yet, methinks. ;) As above, I think we should refrain from including the kitchen sink in the template and only do so if usage, currency, and citations can support it. None of the compendiums in my possession, for instance, note the

2121:

tools - even if they occasionally compromise accuracy or NPOV to do so. Lots of children and new users are going to be navigating the country/continent pages and in my opinion, having Show/Hide templates which repeat each other's material will be immediately

2419:

regions in Eastern Africa", etc and then move the links on the second line ("Great Lakes", "Guinea", "Horn of Africa", etc) out of the template to the relevant lists – then do the same for the Americas and Eurasia? It might be easier to convert Andeggs'

1178:

DK: I'm unsure. I guess we could reverse the question: how often does one hear East Europe or North Europe? Take a glance at the subregions for Africa, for example, and it strikes me as mildly odd if not inconsistent (for obvious reasons, though) that

2322:

I agree that the current template is becoming (if not already) large and the criteria for including subcontinental (sub)regions probably too woolly. Perhaps it may never be anything but very woolly, in which case a solution may be to adopt Andeggs'

385:

a great deal. The first is a region combining elements of Central and Eastern, while the term "greater Horn" is a nice way of getting a subset of East Africa. That said, the Horn isn't listed on the template and I'm not sure I've ever heard of

2672:

I don't think the above discussion shows any consensus for a total adherence to the UN system, just that the UN system is a useful guide. Keeping "Northern America" is both silly and violates the basic Knowledge policy of using common names. -

3088:

Central Asian places like Afghanistan, Tibet, and Xinjiang that have nothing to do with Europe should not be dubbed Eurasian. Please cite sources that actually refer to Central Asia and Eurasia interchangeably. I am reverting unref'ed edits.

2034:

Hmmm; I'm unsure this is a problem that needs to be solved ... if even there is one. I prefer the current template – I'm all for highlighting and using the UN scheme to organise this and that, but I think the current sublime segregation of

2444:

deserves inclusion, or some could argue that? I feel if the template is pruned, as proposed, someone will liberally add more regions to it anyway. And if this template's edit history is any indication, the template currently seems rather

3064:

in that article presents some problems (it includes Jordan, and some "suspect" countries in Asia). But that is not a matter of concern for this template. To be safe I'm going to include the proper requests for improvement in the article.

1558:

this gets difficult to assess and justify, and some category 3 regions - new term! =] - are defined by physical geography while others are macro-economic in nature. I totally concur about North and South America (as discussed elsewhere)

339:

Knowledge ought to take a more consistent approach to the naming conventions used for the regions of the African continent. Officially, they are Northern, Western, Eastern, Southern, and Central, and should be recognized accordingly.

1729:

Currently the template has ]. Is that correct? From reading the above I'm guessing the display text is set according to one preference/standard and the page name is set according to some other preference/standard. Can anyone clarify?

2216:) ... thereby seeming rather weasely. And, again, they are not solely UN regions but ones that are commonly known. To use an adage: if it ain't broke, don't fix it ... and even if it is, the proposed template isn't the solution. 2648:

causes some overlap of coverage, but it would be even worse to leave out the article at North America. I believe that including North, Central, and South America on the template is the best configuration, with the fewest faults.

2484:(in the bottom rh corner) would probably compromise the one-(super)continent-per-line format that currently works well, so I'd probably even prefer to keep that too. (However, any ingenious ideas gratefully heard!) Best wishes, 161: 2104:

could then be used to offer users the option to see/use either or both. I'd also retain the location pictures as they help distinguish which set of links to read through to find a particular subcontinent/region/etc. Regards,

1339:

Goodie. They could be further categorized as either A) continents, B) UN regions or C) other regions. The last category is the one most vulnerable to edit wars over what's in and what's left out. For example, why include the

2125:

On the NPOV point, Pluribus, which is a very interesting one, I don't think we will ever escape it. Nationalists, colonialists and expansionists, etc. will no doubt disagree with the current divisions. Think for example of

1826:"North" America. I agree, though, that there's much to be said for an initial three-way division of the Americas (into North, Central and South America) but I don't think that's the norm... Anyone else know more? Regards, 3583:-firm support for the B maps as per above. The A maps aren't even good quality, the grey and greens are not consistent across the map. The bitmap editors the user was using "smeared" the colors so that the colors got off. 2154:

Re making templates clear, easy-to-use navigational tools, I'd say the return of the location pictures certainly helps. On the cosmetic side, would you mind if the (non-aligned) colons were removed? Thanks for your work,

2440:

Regions are conceptual constructs and, thus, vary depending on source and even on user. And the 'UN' regions above are not just those indicated by the UN but in common usage. And what of others: foe example, surely the

2181:

In any event, I disagree that the current design is problematic and the proposed template does not allay any of the concerns cited and prompts added ones. The current one, in the least, proceeds from larger to smaller

1911:

as an attempt to solve the UN/not-UN debate and also to make the template a bit easier to use. The location pictures have had been sacrificed for space but most people know where Africa is anyway. Thoughts? Comments?

3496:

You see, there is a lot of controversy regarding that. Namely the Turkey issue. Regarding Israel... well I suppose we should just colour all of the Americas and Australia/New Zealand as being part of Europe, no?!?

3602:

Compared to other regions here, Middle East is incredibly biased, controversial, ambiguous and subjective term. It's simply not in the same league with terms like Europe, Asia, Africa. I'm going to remove it. --

3821:

This template is too much. It's a big unwieldy mess that in trying to include EVERYTHING has become meaningless and hard to navigate. Suggest it gets wound back to its former size and just be a normal template.

3133:

I have changed the name of the link "Eurasia" to "Central Asia". If that was all you wanted reverted, you should have just changed that; but your original revert left a whole variety of valid changes undone.

2458:

within regions (and linked appropriately) is interesting, but this seems a make-work project for not what: most of these sub/regions are already listed in the that article or (if not) should be added to it.

1116:... where usage is generally distinct with cited examples.) Is there a reason why one article cannot deal with notions of both? One should redirect to the other and, without, objection, I will do this. 2425:

to achieve the same. Either way, I feel links to regions such as "Great Lakes", "Patagonia", "Anatolia", "Benelux", "Kazakh Steppes", etc are probably best kept one link away from the template. Regards,

2312:. My argument is that we should strive for a neat, workable navigation template by overcoming these problems rather than lumbering on with the current unworkable, biased and down-right ugly version. ;-) 1275:. Yes? Then all the informal, but commonly used, regions with variable definitions can be added underneath in italics to denote their fuzziness, while at the same time acknowledging their extensive use. 3618:

Reverted. Yes it is a completely Eurocentric term, but unfortunately it's a very common one, and it's one of the most well-known cultural regions of the world. Without it, the template would be flawed.

2248:

Most fundamentally I have removed all non-UN links. This is radical but I think it's the only way of keeping a hold on this template which just seems to grow without limit. How can we justify including

2944:(i.e.: a country with parts in both continents). I propose that either someone finds a better article and links it to (something to do with Europe) or failing that it should be removed altogether. 2663:

even though this excludes "North America". Note that the first few lines of the page on Northern America does link to the constituent countries so this system is navigationally efficient. Thanks

2774:

think, to make sure readers know something like a list of regions of the world is a generalized classification scheme with a specific point of view, and that other equally valid systems exist.

1216:. This said, there are some forms which do differ in meaning/usage (cf North vs Northern America). I have no easy answer for the less rigidly defined (but not necessarily less used) names for 2534: 2420: 2324: 2301: 2238: 2134: 1908: 1796:

features continental divisions, subdivisions, etc. For now, I'd say keep both, as this seems a useful distinction. Not quite sure what/where your African inspiration lies...? Regards,

959: 2059:

in highlighting the UN or any one scheme. In addition, the 'UN' regions are not limited to the UN (i.e., they are in common usage) and may have interpretations that differ (e.g.,

1815:"good" enough to have it's own category, or should it be deleted from one of the Americas? Geographically, I would place it in North, but culturally, in South. Any other thoughts? 3802:

I'm pretty sure Maryland is not a part of Asia. Or at-least the Maryland that is linked is not in Asia but the United States. As pointed out by FoulCoke on reddit.com/r/maryland

1752:) and elsewhere, whereby Western Asia is indicated (which redirects to Southwest Asi). This also precludes apparent inconsistency in the template: e.g., Southwest Asia, yet East 2378:

In summary: the current version may not be ideal, but the proposed versions are even less palatable. However, I also thank Andeggs etc. in efforts to improve the template.

347:

Now aside from the official name of a Knowledge page itself, users will always be at the utmost liberty to use any term they so choose and according to their personal style:

276: 344:

denotation, hence Knowledge’s disambiguation page for it. Another good example is the distinction between 'South Africa', the country, and 'Southern Africa', the region.

2591:

is not included? I'm personally interested as at various times my home town has been considered a part of Eastern, Western and even Northern Europe, yet it's was in the

3448: 1159: 3655: 2640:. It doesn't make sense for this template to lack a link to North America, and the term "Northern America" is by comparison quite obscure. I am aware that including 1428: 1137:

Similarly, I'm of the very strong belief that – unless there's sufficient reason otherwise – all sub/regional articles (e.g., for continents) should be entitled at "

3416:

For all the above reasons, I believe that the A maps are just wrong and, in fact, POV. So the B maps are the ones who should be placed in the template. Thank you.

3347:

Since when does geographical Europe include the whole of the Asian parts of Rusia, as well as all the other countries from the fomer Soviet Union, well beyond the

1432: 1247:

BA: see above. As well, perhaps we should merely include a link to the article regarding informal regiona and only include agreeable/prevalent/systematic ones?

3807: 1034:

AOK. Build the article with that sourcing in mind. I guess my main point is not overloading the template. Perhaps we should include a link in the template to

948: 234: 1495: 1195: 1169: 1028: 1002: 763: 3289:

Hello everyone. There are several issues with the geographical maps of Asia and Europe categorized as A, some major (substantive) and some minor (procedural):

1767: 1710: 1674: 1617: 1577: 1548: 1529:. Given that LA is more a sociopolitical delineation (with varied definition), I don't think that should trump universal geographic, continental distinctions ( 1327: 1294: 1258: 1242: 1073: 1049: 933: 845: 801: 404: 3407:, now definetely blocked, and basically defended by 4 anon users, 2 of whom are now blocked. The only good faith editor that seems to prefer them is Maltalia. 3584: 3143: 3119: 3090: 2857:

I think I prefer keeping "of the world"... I volunteer to wait a day or so (in case anyone else passes by with an objection or alternative) and then rename.

2464: 2403: 2383: 1594:

because of that, but where does one draw the line? For now the current version is fine to me. However, there's room for improvement: perhaps we should nix

651:

pea. Borders are determined by the artistic nature of the person drawing. Article displays the flag as well as other goodies of the proposed kurdish nation.

2659:

Sorry I have reverted this to "Northern" as per discussions above. It seems that most people agree that it is least conflictual if the template follows the

1896: 3035: 3009: 2968: 2227: 2088: 1132: 669: 418:

Let me just voice my concern about the excess compartmentalization of the world in a manner that doesn't seem to resemble a single scientific approach. --

220: 3485: 3452: 2621: 2553:

existing region pages. I'm sure all of them have links to the subregions somewhere but it might be worth ensuring they are in the first few paragraphs.

2488: 2470: 2430: 2294: 1599: 1217: 1035: 290: 2902:

Hi Flamarande. I couldn't agree more with you, there's a real danger of the template becoming unmanageable. A while back we had similar problems (see

2607: 1830: 1800: 3634:

Can we please add the Middle East Back? Think we should also differentiate Central American from the rest of North America, as well as the Caribbean

2868: 2844: 2693: 2574: 2557: 2543: 2159: 2141: 636: 401: 399: 3074: 3013: 2991: 2972: 2940:. What has Central Asia do to with European geography and/or culture? If you care to read the article Russia it says quite clearly that Russia is a 2023: 1976: 1962: 2925: 1127: 3848: 3559: 3506: 3425: 3039: 2982:

include all regions/countries with cultural ties with Europe use the proper article (i.e.: the so-called "Greater European sphere of influence").

2831: 2337:" page. Starting from some of the blank maps available at the Commons, I'd happily volunteer to create/adapt such images, on an as-and-when basis. 1756:

Europe. Personally, I'd prefer if the article (and others like it) were moved to the UN entitlements, but one can't have everything just yet. :)

3031: 3005: 2964: 1734: 660: 359: 3221: 3212: 3193: 2820:

Good point, Pfly, I think; how about amending the template's name and title to something like "Geopolitical regions of the world"...? Regards,

366:

What do you mean officially? Regions don't have official names. Knowledge policy is to use the most common unambiguous name for articles, see

2677: 1849:, which is true. This sub/regional template is (rightly) geared along a geographic/physiographic hierarchy for ease, not a sociopolitical one 227: 191: 165: 3628: 2704: 1779:

thought the other continents should be as well, and while browsing over Africa saw three geographic tables which just screamed "clean me up!"

2667: 1271:

Suggestion: Let's promote/highlight the UN-designated subregions then under their proper continents, arranged in a hierachical tree based on

248: 206: 962:, I've tweaked it accordingly. I'm wondering, however, if the formatting can be improved somehow: the template now looks far too ... high. 896:

This also applies to some other regions in the current template and I think it can be pruned of them. I'm quite surprised, actually, that

3659: 2342:

In the meantime, however, thanks to Andeggs for his efforts and obvious thought about this template. Best wishes, 17:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

3476:

An IP address in the 78.1... range? I am sorry but blatantly the same as the other IP here before. I am therefore striking your comment.

2814: 1783: 2763: 2109: 3865: 2186:. The proposed template is IMO an ineffective navigational tool, not at all intuitive, and flawed at its root. In it, there (remain) 649:

This is a highly contraversial ethnic region with undefined borders. Basicaly it can occupy the entier galaxy r could be the size of a

3870: 3004:

I'm not really sure what you mean. Perhaps if you carry out the changes on the article, we can see how we can proceed from there? :)

2409: 2389: 3811: 2896: 2653: 2519: 2316: 1916: 1204:

I, just like yourself EPA, am hugely enthusiastic about using UN-designated subregions, which means my own personal preference for

3875: 2810:("the Horse latitudes"), and so on. And each of these points of view will result in radically different "regions of the world". 1598:

of the 'category 3' hurricanes, including only the UN sub/regions in a revised template but providing links to articles (like to

693:

already exists, but that this article seems to restrict itself to dealing solely with the two Congos, and not the wider, vaguer

3158:- the one who first introduced the maps, now blocked for being an open proxy or zombie computer, coming from Opal Telecom, GB, 3127: 3098: 2747: 565: 531: 213: 187: 3112: 2094:

How about having two templates that link to each other, one that follows the UN/non-UN distinction and the current template?

1819: 3713: 3689: 1724: 3592: 2351:

simplistic and create added problems. I share concerns expressed by others about the exclusion or the consolidation of the

3444: 3167: 2953: 2768: 1537:). And though I'm loathe to do so, perhaps we should consider adding regions in more than one continent to each of them? 1100:– usage differentiating the two is unclear at best and this can only promote confusion. (This is different, however, from 466:

I realize packing in every possible region is impossible, but I wager these usages are far more common than, for instance,

103: 664: 3651: 3612: 3159: 3135: 3104: 2840:

Yes I agree with this too. We could be even blunter and call it "Geopolitical regions (according to the United Nations)".

1424: 958:

largely coincides with the revised template and cardinal directions noted (with few exceptions, like the Caribbean), and

241: 2333:

subcontinental regions, including a color-coded image of each continent/subcontinental area on each "List of regions in

3298:

Since when does geographical Asia include the whole of the European parts of Russia (includind the isolated exclave of

570: 3540: 3283: 3179: 2917:

regions of the world, since they have classification system in theory agreed by all its members (and therefore fairly

1606:) that summarise regions on each continent? That would allow everyone to have their cake and eat it too. Thoughts? 3803: 2684:

I also agree, we should not use the term "Northern America" for various reasons, mainly because it is used by the UN

2012: 1951: 262: 3565:

I strongly prefer the B maps, which show the geographical regions, just as they should. Compare the description of

3831: 1773: 1081: 554: 549:

is a disambig page, there is no page related to the geographic area "congo" to replace it with, only the countries

3578: 3236: 875:

can – and has – been retrofitted to deal with this and human geographic elements can be included elsewhere (e.g.,

2117:

I'm afraid I've got to disagree with you David. My over-riding concern is that templates are clear, easy-to-use,

2055:). The current one – by keeping things somewhat non-descript yet organised – mitigates potential accusations of 94: 58: 3186: 2777:

What I mean is, this template's system is a fine system of (relatively large) regions from the point of view of

2627: 181: 3723:

These are two distinct regions, not subregions of one and the same region, and should be listed separately as

3718: 3704:

Eurasia is a single continent and landmass, but North America and South America are two different landmasses.

3404: 1793: 686: 1165:

Is common usage such as "West Africa" rather than "Western Africa" sufficient reason otherwise...? Unsure,

3637: 2570:

If you don't mind waiting a day or so, I should be able to make the time to create these lists...? Yours,

2221: 2174:

I actually tend to think that adopting the UN scheme, given the absence of a salient alternative, is quite

2082: 1890: 1761: 1704: 1611: 1542: 1321: 1252: 1189: 1153: 1121: 1043: 996: 927: 795: 367: 283: 172: 154: 33: 2907: 2713: 1513:

above, which I've added.) The only deficiencies are regions (geo or otherwise) that traverse continents:

1902: 2759:

the region called "Northern North America, doesn't mean that its the most appropriate way to divide it.

2245:

included. It also includes the world's oceans which are unduly missing lacking in the current template.

358:

I hope that this clarifies the rationale for making the names of the African regions more consistent...

355:, for instance, but Knowledge should, at least, retain the best term for its official page designation. 2660: 1924: 255: 2196: 3332: 3103:

Neither Afghanistan, Tibet, or Xinjiang have been placed under Europe. Please actually read the map.

2921:). I would be happy with that but there would then there would be an implicit endorsement of the UN. 2878: 2782: 2743: 2043:

is better than the proposed arrangement that cleaves regions and duplicates over-arching ones (e.g.,

1501:

I think the current template simply/already reflects all of this and, yet, is a balanced approach to

3797: 3731:

at the region level. We don't need any grouping of regions like 'Polar regions' in this template.

3588: 3155: 3123: 3094: 2281: 1475:

The continent of North America... comprises Northern America..., Caribbean..., and Central America.

863:– though I obviously don't deny it – but emphasise the two titular countries and (importantly) the 304: 102:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3709: 3163: 3139: 3108: 2795: 2539:

to be given a try, perhaps with the "links to lists of subregions" suggested above...? Regards,

2526: 2507: 2217: 2078: 1886: 1811:

Isnt it superflouous to link to Latin America twice from the North AND South America regions? Is

1757: 1700: 1607: 1538: 1317: 1248: 1185: 1149: 1117: 1039: 992: 923: 791: 633: 527: 2903: 2689:

that some countries teach that Central America is a subdivions of the North American continent.

1972:

Once pages for all UN subregions have been created, this template could be tweaked accordingly.

3684: 2863: 2826: 2200:) and segregates regions rather haphazardly (e.g., the UN scheme also demarcates the continent 1603: 706: 537: 395: 413: 3305:

Since when does geographical Asia include the whole of the European parts of Turkey (Turkish

2002: 1941: 1806: 1670: 1573: 1491: 1290: 1238: 1069: 1024: 841: 759: 550: 370:. If you disagree with this policy discuss it there, don't begin changing it unilaterally. - 39: 3264: 3256: 2056: 3070: 2987: 2949: 2739: 2735: 2701: 2690: 2618: 1420: 922:

get too unwieldy. However, I'm somewhat easy on this, but less so on the issue below. :)

378: 269: 8: 3844: 3597: 2778: 2304:

are manageable. Most significantly I believe sticking points remain over the handling of

740: 711: 3246: 3170:- coming from Cablesurf Network Equipment, Ireland)! Something must be done about this! 3154:

Some anon users insiste on introducing obviously WRONG and POV maps of Europe and Asia (

3705: 3555: 3536: 3502: 3481: 3421: 3352: 3279: 3208: 3175: 2791: 2786: 2604: 1789: 1145: 1138: 980: 562: 523: 3312:

Since when there are two types of geographical Asia - darker greenand lighter green?!?

2587:

I'd say dump the "UN system" and replace it with a more natural one. Why for instance

1272: 331: 3827: 3753: 3678: 3624: 2858: 2821: 2571: 2540: 2485: 2427: 2269: 2156: 2106: 1827: 1797: 1526: 1166: 945: 876: 641: 503: 430: 199: 3839:

Agree on that. By the way the US and Canada occupies a dis-proportioned part of it.

3358:

Since when does geographical Europe include the whole of the Asian parts of Turkey (

2910:. The only worthwhile addition to it that I can see is that of a Show/Hide facility. 2237:

At the risk of pushing this too far and making myself a few enemies, I have created

3757: 3664: 3316: 2931: 2633: 2360: 2309: 2205: 1993: 1932: 1731: 1660: 1563: 1481: 1280: 1228: 1105: 1059: 1014: 831: 749: 467: 86: 3443:

are seen as "European", such as Israel. That is why all of Turkey is highlighted.

3694: 3642:

Polar gets on this template, Arctic and Antarctic, but what about antiPolar? The

3608: 3066: 2983: 2945: 2893: 2726: 2641: 2209: 2098: 1858: 1812: 1510: 1180: 1113: 960:

consistent with prior discussions and a quest to balance geographic content in Wp

897: 735: 731: 3439:

I agree with you about the Asia map. However, the European one highlights which

3335:), as well as all the other islands west of it that are part of Melanesia, like 632:

I'm fine with either or, but a melange of the two doesn't make sense. Thanks!

3840: 3574: 3547: 3528: 3348: 2960: 2918: 2914: 2888: 2884: 2760: 2592: 2588: 2530: 2499: 2460: 2399: 2379: 2286: 2175: 2127: 2069: 2060: 1741: 1652: 1591: 1345: 1223:

As for rearranging the template hierarchically or topically, that makes sense.

984: 905: 901: 880: 868: 860: 783: 774: 727: 702: 682: 491: 479: 471: 382: 352: 348: 297: 186:. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: 2959:

Hi. Central Asia is sometimes considered part of Europe under the umbrella of

2720:. UN system, based in economics, is not necesarily better. What about having " 162:

Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places

3859: 3551: 3532: 3498: 3477: 3417: 3275: 3204: 3171: 3149: 2803: 2722: 2645: 2637: 2601: 2511: 2415:

Never too late for more points of view, A the 0th – thanks for your interest!

2372: 2356: 2305: 2257: 2201: 2052: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1816: 1780: 1648: 1534: 1530: 1514: 1341: 1101: 1093: 1082: 988: 770: 723: 611: 607: 558: 460: 448: 440: 70: 52: 867:... which actually is the true predicate for everything around it. Can you 557:, it doesn't seem like either of those is appropriate but I could be wrong. 3823: 3741: 3701: 3620: 2922: 2841: 2799: 2664: 2554: 2516: 2313: 2290: 2138: 1973: 1913: 1640: 1109: 483: 419: 3274:

that only half of Asia is Asian. That is my thought on the matter anyway.

2241:. This incorporates both the UN system and the desire to have the world's 2070:

I utterly oppose creating dedicated articles for each of the UN subregions

1748:

has been adopted here (particularly for entries on the first line of each

3816: 3765: 3674: 3370: 3306: 3299: 3218: 3190: 2807: 2674: 2441: 1522: 864: 575:

Hello! To rectify the apparent imbalance in the categorising of various

515: 511: 435:

Is there any particular reason the following designations were not used?

391: 377:

I would disagree with your argument on regions listed for Africa. I use

371: 141: 658:

article in contrast with other articles and you will see what I mean. --

3788: 3771: 3647: 3604: 3324: 3320: 3189:

and resolve this issue before any further edit warring takes place. --

2503: 2300:

There are limits to all designs of this nature but I think the ones in

1865:

continent, a three-way split based on that is unjustified. Similarly,

1097: 1086: 777:

might prevail in common usage (hence perhaps retaining it where it is).

654:

I hence believe its presence is inaproporate on this template. Put the

475: 3735:

we also have not a "equatorial region", I agree and gonna split it as

2712:

Having both Northern and North America seams absurd. I understand the

738:

is used to effectively disambiguate from South Africa. Please respond

3745: 3570: 3377: 2811: 2650: 2455: 2398:

is a great idea! I will incorporate this into the current template.

2242: 2213: 2191: 2183: 2036: 1882: 1749: 1745: 1636: 976: 955: 883:

for now, but please feel free to build it and maybe include it later.

694: 655: 642: 580: 576: 454: 444: 99: 3776: 3670: 3359: 2352: 2137:. Again, I'd again appreciate comments (and edits if possible). Ta 2044: 1866: 1862: 1518: 1506: 968: 603: 592: 519: 1990:

is not a subregion, should it be included in the template at all?

991:(straddling both) might be problematic within the current layout. 3780: 3643: 3328: 3162:- coming from Opal Telecom, GB, the same anon as the precedent?; 2297:

should be linked to and improved (as suggested by others above).

2251: 1870: 1644: 1502: 972: 908:

are far more prevalent. Importantly, none of these cite sources.

617: 596: 387: 3400:, and I this say so in one of my edits - I have nothing to hide. 2913:

An alternative approach is to recast this template as being the

2178:; however, some think of it to the contrary for whatever reason. 1590:

From the get-go, this has been my point. I was reticent to nix

1054:

EPA: Regarding inclusion of non-UN informal regions, see below.

987:

this is actually required, but I acknowledge that the region of

3784: 3749: 3566: 3366: 2395: 2364: 2285:? The only way is through dispute on this talk page (e.g. over 2275: 2263: 2048: 2040: 1874: 625: 584: 495: 2194:

despite traditional and common notions to the contrary (e.g.,

3336: 872: 814:

is a portion of the African continent on par with (historic)

787: 698: 690: 546: 539: 507: 499: 3700:

one entity and Eurasia as two different is not justified as

3166:- coming from Opal Telecom, GB, blocked for violating 3RR, 2368: 1878: 1699:

or mild variation (with lines) is seemingly sufficient. :)

983:. There's little reason to not do so, and (as above) for 944:

template from becoming cluttered. What think ye? Regards,

730:- is the least ambiguous name for the region, as listed at 621: 595:), I've reorganised it to consolidate Europe and Asia into 588: 2790:

about the world and its regions include the viewpoints of

1837:

I think the current arrangement is sufficient: mentioning

904:

is a shell of what it can be. And both the Sudan and the

3376:

Since when does geographical Europe include the whole of

3365:

Since when does geographical Europe include the whole of

3030:

Ok, the changes make sense. I guess it avoids ambiguity.

1740:

Yes, it is correct: to forego ambiguity and as part of a

1313: 599:. Another way to do this is to separate out as follows: 2883:

Hy (first post here) I have been improving the articles

2781:. Of course there are other branches of geography (see 2133:

I have created a new version (with the maps back in) at

719: 426:

What do you mean? The regions listed aren't scientfic?

2329:

template but make the links to subcontinents links to

1351:

The UN, as we know, divides the world thusly: World

3550:

article, nor for the template Regions of the World!

277:

Geography articles with topics of unclear notability

98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 76: 2293:. If large informal regions deserve a mention then 482:, which is a familiar zone to frequent flyers). - 3403:These A maps were introduced in this template by 3857: 3396:Yes, I've tagged these A maps in the Commons as 685:mainly because I felt that it was missing from 494:to which some parts of Siberia and Far East of 235:Articles missing geocoordinate data by country 2063:). Moreover, the maps aid in understanding. 1133:Titles of regional articles noting direction 900:has been developed as much as it has, while 718:And a related issue: I would argue that the 545:This is for disambig link repair, currently 2394:As well, I think the suggestion to include 1853:. I generally hark of DK's sentiments ... 697:. What is the preferred option now: should 3546:My friend... that is a discussion for the 149:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 3677:under both the Europe and Asia headings. 3235: 2716:was too big, but it better described the 291:Knowledge requested photographs of places 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 3323:, in fact, since when does the whole of 1473:It makes a careful point of noting that 398:certainly doesn't seem to think so. - 221:Geographic related deletion discussions 3858: 2239:one last design for your consideration 1744:attempt to organise said content, the 689:. Only afterwards did I discover that 2533:... Meanwhile, though, I'm happy for 2184:without splitting hairs unnecessarily 1861:is a subregion of the North American/ 1220:, such as Indochina or "Pacific Rim". 786:, however, is (should be) covered in 192:Unknown-importance geography articles 92:This template is within the scope of 21: 19: 3673:be added to this template alongside 2072:: the current sub/regional articles 954:Great. Given that the UN scheme for 249:Geography articles needing infoboxes 207:Geography articles needing attention 178:Tag related article talk pages with 15: 3327:is in geographical Asia and not in 2135:Template:Regions_of_the_world/Temp2 1746:UN scheme for geographic subregions 1316:? I'm easy, though. Have at it! 1096:was recently created distinct from 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 3719:Arctic Region and Antarctic Region 3369:(as a single area isolated in the 2454:The idea of having articles about 2289:) which is prone to domination by 1909:Template:Regions_of_the_world/Temp 1792:features continents only, whereas 336:Editors of the 'Region' template, 14: 3887: 3866:Template-Class geography articles 1148:foo" for consistency. Thoughts? 131:WikiProject Geography To-do list: 3871:NA-importance geography articles 3263: 3255: 3245: 3237: 2936:"Eurasian" leads to the article 2525:Yes... Disappointing news about 1881:, though I see little debate to 1378:Latin America and the Caribbean 967:Moreover, I've equilibrated the 555:Democratic Republic of the Congo 166:Missing articles about Locations 140: 79: 69: 51: 20: 2047:) while omitting others (e.g., 726:- which currently redirects to 112:Knowledge:WikiProject Geography 3876:WikiProject Geography articles 3060:To be honest I think that the 2705:23:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 2700:they will find it there also. 879:or similar). I've redirected 709:instead? Please have your say 470:(and why Northeast instead of 115:Template:WikiProject Geography 1: 3812:02:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC) 3763:Also we need open-start with 3660:13:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC) 3319:is in another continent that 3217:Some maps follow to help. -- 2694:05:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 2622:05:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 1907:I have created a redesign at 1794:Template:Regions of the world 1725:Southwest Asia / Western Asia 1038:while pruning it of excess? 687:Template:Regions of the world 637:12:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 532:03:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 188:Unassessed geography articles 106:and see a list of open tasks. 3492:Yes! But responding to him: 2926:11:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 2869:14:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2845:12:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2832:12:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2815:07:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 2769:One of many regional systems 2764:20:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 681:Today I created the article 566:01:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC) 368:Knowledge:Naming conventions 7: 3593:22:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 3579:21:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3560:16:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3541:16:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3507:16:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3486:16:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3453:16:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3426:16:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3284:14:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3222:14:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3213:13:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3194:13:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 3180:12:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 2897:12:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 2806:("Appalachian Mountains"), 2794:(example region, "NAFTA"), 1433:10:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 10: 3892: 3333:Image:Oceanias Regions.png 3144:21:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 3128:21:36, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 3113:21:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 3099:20:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 2785:). From the viewpoint of 2228:13:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2160:13:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2142:06:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2110:00:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC) 2089:16:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 2024:16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 1977:16:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 1963:16:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 1917:16:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 1897:23:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC) 1711:19:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC) 1675:16:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1618:16:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1578:16:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1549:15:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1496:15:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1328:15:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1295:15:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1259:15:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1243:14:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1196:15:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1170:14:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1160:14:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1128:15:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 1074:15:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1050:15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1029:14:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 1003:15:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 949:14:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 934:14:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 846:13:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 802:15:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 773:, though acknowledge that 764:10:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 571:Reorganisation of template 3714:20:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 3629:16:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 3613:17:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 3494:Seen as European by whom? 3185:78.146.17.244's block log 3075:15:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 3040:15:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 3014:15:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 2992:15:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 2973:14:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 2954:14:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 2783:Template:Geography topics 2678:21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 2668:22:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 2654:06:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC) 2608:08:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 1831:06:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 1820:05:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 1801:06:20, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 1784:04:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC) 1768:13:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1735:13:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 1458:Australia and New Zealand 1092:Moreover, I'm unsure why 871:anything? Thus, I think 665:18:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC) 422:20:40, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC) 374:07:51, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) 362:07:46, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 126: 64: 46: 3849:09:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 3832:10:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC) 3690:19:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 3669:I would like to propose 2942:transcontinental country 2575:13:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 2558:06:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 2544:02:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 2520:11:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 2489:17:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2471:13:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2431:12:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2410:10:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2390:10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2317:15:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC) 2282:Midwestern United States 1774:Australasia vs Australia 1509:. (You're also missing 583:in this template (e.g., 486:5 July 2005 23:20 (UTC) 409:01:21, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) 390:, for example, being in 263:Knowledge requested maps 228:Geographical coordinates 2906:above) and implemented 2798:("Amazon rainforest"), 2796:Environmental geography 2197:Encyclopædia Britannica 2628:Northern/North America 2363:) while splitting out 1604:Americas (terminology) 1602:or perhaps anew, like 707:Congo (disambiguation) 490:Yes, why is not there 396:East African Community 332:Naming African regions 2359:, which differs from 2077:considered instead. 551:Republic of the Congo 182:WikiProject Geography 95:WikiProject Geography 3638:Polar and antiPolar? 3398:factually inaccurate 2718:regions of the world 2190:mentions of various 1885:... nor should we. 1344:while excluding the 1273:this familiar scheme 782:The topic matter in 379:Great Lakes (Africa) 2779:Political geography 1903:A proposed redesign 502:, western coast of 3353:Caucasus Mountains 2792:Economic geography 2787:Cultural geography 2527:E Pluribus Anthony 2510:as established by 2508:E Pluribus Anthony 2218:E Pluribus Anthony 2079:E Pluribus Anthony 1887:E Pluribus Anthony 1869:is a subregion in 1790:Template:Continent 1758:E Pluribus Anthony 1701:E Pluribus Anthony 1655:), but not quite. 1608:E Pluribus Anthony 1539:E Pluribus Anthony 1409:South-Eastern Asia 1318:E Pluribus Anthony 1249:E Pluribus Anthony 1186:E Pluribus Anthony 1150:E Pluribus Anthony 1146:cardinal direction 1144:foo", not merely " 1139:cardinal direction 1118:E Pluribus Anthony 1040:E Pluribus Anthony 993:E Pluribus Anthony 981:Western hemisphere 975:and split out the 924:E Pluribus Anthony 810:I truly feel that 792:E Pluribus Anthony 634:E Pluribus Anthony 118:geography articles 34:content assessment 3754:Equatorial region 3702:physiographically 3271: 3270: 2879:Too many regions? 2752: 2738:comment added by 2270:North China Plain 2017: 2007: 1996: 1956: 1946: 1935: 1883:split those hairs 1673: 1643:, but not quite. 1576: 1527:Southeastern Asia 1521:, even, arguably 1494: 1435: 1423:comment added by 1293: 1241: 1072: 1027: 877:Culture of Africa 844: 762: 663: 504:The United States 329: 328: 325: 324: 321: 320: 317: 316: 313: 312: 3883: 3798:Maryland in Asia 3758:Middle latitudes 3687: 3681: 3646:and surrounding 3317:Papua New Guinea 3315:Since when does 3267: 3259: 3249: 3241: 3239: 3238:Location of Asia 3231: 3230: 2867: 2830: 2802:("ecoregions"), 2751: 2732: 2714:previous version 2634:Northern America 2599: 2361:Northern America 2355:(like, where is 2310:Northern America 2206:Northern America 2103: 2097: 2020: 2011: 2010: 2001: 2000: 1992: 1959: 1950: 1949: 1940: 1939: 1931: 1873:straddling both 1669: 1667: 1659: 1600:informal regions 1572: 1570: 1562: 1490: 1488: 1480: 1418: 1392:Northern America 1289: 1287: 1279: 1237: 1235: 1227: 1218:informal regions 1106:Northern America 1068: 1066: 1058: 1036:informal regions 1023: 1021: 1013: 840: 838: 830: 769:I support using 758: 756: 748: 705:and redirect to 659: 468:Northeast Africa 414:Not "scientific" 407: 214:Deletion sorting 185: 155:Article requests 144: 137: 136: 128: 127: 120: 119: 116: 113: 110: 89: 87:Geography portal 84: 83: 82: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 47: 25: 24: 23: 16: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3856: 3855: 3819: 3800: 3721: 3697: 3685: 3679: 3667: 3640: 3600: 3152: 2934: 2881: 2861: 2824: 2771: 2740:Marianocecowski 2733: 2727:Central America 2702:AlexCovarrubias 2691:AlexCovarrubias 2642:Central America 2630: 2619:AlexCovarrubias 2597: 2264:Guinea (region) 2210:Central America 2101: 2095: 2018: 2008: 1998: 1957: 1947: 1937: 1905: 1859:Central America 1813:Central America 1809: 1776: 1727: 1665: 1657: 1568: 1560: 1511:Southern Africa 1486: 1478: 1447:Southern Europe 1444:Northern Europe 1384:Central America 1367:Southern Africa 1364:Northern Africa 1285: 1277: 1233: 1225: 1181:Southern Africa 1135: 1114:Southern Africa 1090: 1064: 1056: 1019: 1011: 898:Guinea (region) 836: 828: 754: 746: 736:Southern Africa 732:Template:Africa 701:me merged with 679: 646: 573: 543: 433: 416: 405: 334: 309: 305:Geography stubs 179: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 85: 80: 78: 12: 11: 5: 3889: 3879: 3878: 3873: 3868: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3818: 3815: 3799: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3761: 3720: 3717: 3696: 3693: 3666: 3663: 3639: 3636: 3632: 3631: 3599: 3596: 3585:Thegreyanomaly 3563: 3562: 3548:Greater Europe 3529:Greater Europe 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3445:78.146.254.197 3429: 3428: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3401: 3391:Minor issues: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3374: 3363: 3356: 3349:Ural Mountains 3342: 3341: 3340: 3313: 3310: 3303: 3292:Major issues: 3269: 3268: 3260: 3251: 3250: 3242: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3197: 3196: 3168:78.146.254.197 3156:83.220.200.110 3151: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3120:Thegreyanomaly 3091:Thegreyanomaly 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2976: 2975: 2961:Greater Europe 2933: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2915:United Nations 2911: 2889:Eastern Europe 2885:Western Europe 2880: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2835: 2834: 2770: 2767: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2697: 2696: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2595:all the time. 2593:Central Europe 2589:Central Europe 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2547: 2546: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2434: 2433: 2416: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2287:Congo (region) 2258:Kazakh Steppes 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2179: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2131: 2128:Pan-Africanism 2123: 2092: 2091: 2065: 2064: 2061:Western Europe 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1966: 1965: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1834: 1833: 1808: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1671:BA's talk page 1653:Eastern Europe 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1592:Congo (region) 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1574:BA's talk page 1552: 1551: 1492:BA's talk page 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450:Western Europe 1448: 1445: 1442: 1441:Eastern Europe 1436: 1417:Middle East 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370:Western Africa 1368: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1358:Eastern Africa 1346:Barents region 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1291:BA's talk page 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1239:BA's talk page 1221: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1173: 1172: 1134: 1131: 1089: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1070:BA's talk page 1025:BA's talk page 1006: 1005: 964: 963: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 906:Horn of Africa 902:Sudan (region) 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 881:Congo (region) 851: 850: 849: 848: 842:BA's talk page 824:Horn of Africa 805: 804: 784:Congo (region) 779: 778: 775:Central Africa 760:BA's talk page 728:Central Africa 703:Congo (region) 683:Congo (region) 678: 670:Nomenclature: 668: 645: 640: 630: 629: 615: 572: 569: 542: 536: 535: 534: 492:Northeast Asia 480:Northeast Asia 472:Horn of Africa 464: 463: 457: 451: 432: 429: 428: 427: 415: 412: 411: 410: 383:Horn of Africa 375: 349:Western Africa 333: 330: 327: 326: 323: 322: 319: 318: 315: 314: 311: 310: 308: 307: 293: 279: 265: 251: 237: 223: 209: 195: 168: 148: 146: 145: 133: 132: 124: 123: 121: 104:the discussion 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3888: 3877: 3874: 3872: 3869: 3867: 3864: 3863: 3861: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3773: 3768: 3767: 3762: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3742:Polar regions 3740: 3737: 3736: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3730: 3726: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3706:FonsScientiae 3703: 3692: 3691: 3688: 3682: 3676: 3672: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652:70.24.244.248 3649: 3645: 3635: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3595: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3581: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3495: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3406: 3405:User:Jkliajmi 3402: 3399: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3390: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3345: 3343: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3311: 3308: 3304: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3294: 3293: 3291: 3290: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3266: 3261: 3258: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3243: 3240: 3233: 3232: 3223: 3220: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164:78.146.17.244 3161: 3160:89.240.206.86 3157: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3136:78.146.17.244 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105:78.146.17.244 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2927: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2895: 2890: 2886: 2870: 2865: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2846: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2833: 2828: 2823: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2804:Geomorphology 2801: 2797: 2793: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2775: 2766: 2765: 2762: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2730: 2728: 2724: 2723:North America 2719: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2695: 2692: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2647: 2646:North America 2643: 2639: 2638:North America 2635: 2623: 2620: 2615: 2614: 2609: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2559: 2556: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2490: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2424: 2423: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2374: 2371:– that isn't 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357:North America 2354: 2350: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2306:Latin America 2303: 2298: 2296: 2292: 2291:conservatives 2288: 2284: 2283: 2278: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2246: 2244: 2240: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2204:as including 2203: 2202:North America 2199: 2198: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2180: 2177: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2161: 2158: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2108: 2100: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2080: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053:North America 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2032: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2015: 2006: 2005: 1995: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1975: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1955: 1954: 1945: 1944: 1934: 1928: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1910: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847:South America 1844: 1843:North America 1840: 1839:Latin America 1836: 1835: 1832: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1807:Latin America 1802: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1662: 1654: 1650: 1649:Northern Asia 1646: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1540: 1536: 1535:South America 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1515:Latin America 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1484: 1483: 1476: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425:94.200.190.46 1422: 1416: 1411: 1408: 1406:Southern Asia 1405: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1391: 1387:South America 1386: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1377: 1376: 1374: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1361:Middle Africa 1360: 1357: 1356: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1342:Baltic region 1329: 1325: 1324: 1319: 1315: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1260: 1256: 1255: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102:North America 1099: 1095: 1094:Southern Asia 1088: 1084: 1083:Southern Asia 1075: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1004: 1000: 999: 994: 990: 989:Latin America 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 952: 951: 950: 947: 935: 931: 930: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 907: 903: 899: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 847: 843: 839: 834: 833: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 803: 799: 798: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 776: 772: 771:Middle Africa 768: 767: 766: 765: 761: 757: 752: 751: 743: 742: 737: 733: 729: 725: 724:Middle Africa 721: 716: 714: 713: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 677: 676:Middle Africa 673: 667: 666: 662: 657: 652: 650: 644: 639: 638: 635: 627: 623: 619: 616: 613: 612:South America 609: 608:North America 605: 602: 601: 600: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 568: 567: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 541: 533: 529: 525: 524:GenuineMongol 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 487: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 462: 461:Mediterranean 458: 456: 452: 450: 449:South America 446: 442: 441:North America 438: 437: 436: 425: 424: 423: 421: 408: 403: 400: 397: 393: 389: 384: 380: 376: 373: 369: 365: 364: 363: 361: 356: 354: 350: 345: 341: 337: 306: 302: 300: 299: 294: 292: 288: 286: 285: 280: 278: 274: 272: 271: 266: 264: 260: 258: 257: 252: 250: 246: 244: 243: 238: 236: 232: 230: 229: 224: 222: 218: 216: 215: 210: 208: 204: 202: 201: 196: 193: 189: 183: 177: 175: 174: 169: 167: 163: 159: 157: 156: 151: 150: 147: 143: 139: 138: 135: 134: 130: 129: 125: 122: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 18: 17: 3820: 3801: 3770: 3764: 3738: 3728: 3724: 3722: 3698: 3680:sephia karta 3668: 3641: 3633: 3601: 3582: 3564: 3525: 3493: 3440: 3438: 3397: 3272: 3153: 3116: 3102: 3087: 3061: 2941: 2938:Central Asia 2937: 2935: 2908:this version 2882: 2822:David Kernow 2800:Biogeography 2776: 2772: 2757: 2721: 2717: 2698: 2685: 2631: 2596: 2541:David Kernow 2535: 2498: 2497: 2486:David Kernow 2465: 2428:David Kernow 2421: 2404: 2393: 2384: 2377: 2348: 2345: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2299: 2280: 2274: 2268: 2262: 2256: 2250: 2247: 2236: 2222: 2195: 2187: 2157:David Kernow 2119:navigational 2118: 2107:David Kernow 2093: 2083: 2073: 2057:undue weight 2013: 2003: 1997: 1991: 1952: 1942: 1936: 1930: 1925: 1906: 1891: 1854: 1850: 1828:David Kernow 1810: 1798:David Kernow 1777: 1762: 1753: 1728: 1705: 1696: 1664: 1656: 1641:Central Asia 1612: 1595: 1567: 1559: 1543: 1485: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1419:— Preceding 1412:Western Asia 1403:Eastern Asia 1400:Central Asia 1350: 1338: 1322: 1284: 1276: 1253: 1232: 1224: 1212: 1211: 1210:rather than 1206: 1205: 1190: 1167:David Kernow 1154: 1141: 1136: 1122: 1110:South Africa 1091: 1063: 1055: 1044: 1018: 1010: 1007: 997: 946:David Kernow 942: 928: 861:Congo region 835: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 796: 753: 745: 739: 734:, just like 722:designation 717: 710: 680: 675: 672:Congo Region 671: 653: 648: 647: 631: 574: 544: 465: 434: 417: 357: 346: 342: 338: 335: 296: 295: 282: 281: 268: 267: 254: 253: 240: 239: 226: 225: 212: 211: 198: 197: 171: 170: 153: 152: 93: 40:WikiProjects 29: 3804:108.45.74.6 3766:World ocean 3739:By Latitude 3675:Middle East 3598:Middle East 3531:" concept. 3371:Middle East 3307:East Thrace 3300:Kaliningrad 2808:Climatology 2734:—Preceding 2632:I replaced 2445:manageable. 2442:Middle East 1732:Ewlyahoocom 1661:Big Adamsky 1651:(per UN in 1564:Big Adamsky 1523:Middle East 1482:Big Adamsky 1281:Big Adamsky 1229:Big Adamsky 1060:Big Adamsky 1015:Big Adamsky 865:Congo River 832:Big Adamsky 750:Big Adamsky 516:South Korea 512:North Korea 459:Other: The 392:East Africa 353:West Africa 3860:Categories 3789:Antarctica 3772:Continents 3648:subtropics 3344:Europe A: 3325:New Guinea 3321:Irian Jaya 3262:Europe(B) 3254:Europe(A) 3067:Flamarande 2984:Flamarande 2946:Flamarande 2904:discussion 2894:Flamarande 2504:sockpuppet 2456:subregions 2243:continents 2212:, and the 2192:continents 2122:confusing. 1994:BigAdamsky 1933:BigAdamsky 1926:this table 1697:status quo 1464:Micronesia 1098:South Asia 1087:South Asia 977:continents 956:subregions 744:. Thanks! 715:. Thanks. 581:subregions 577:continents 522:belong? -- 476:North Asia 270:Notability 219:Listed at 3841:Lappspira 3746:Antarctic 3729:Antarctic 3441:countries 3378:Greenland 2761:Supaman89 2661:UN system 2531:A the 0th 2512:CheckUser 2500:A the 0th 2461:A the 0th 2400:A the 0th 2380:A the 0th 2295:this page 2214:Caribbean 2176:impartial 1750:continent 1637:Turkestan 1467:Polynesia 1461:Melanesia 1381:Caribbean 1375:Americas 695:subregion 656:kurdistan 643:Kurdistan 538:Removing 455:Near East 445:Patagonia 439:America: 431:Additions 109:Geography 100:geography 59:Geography 3777:Americas 3671:Caucasus 3665:Caucasus 3552:The Ogre 3533:Maltalia 3499:The Ogre 3478:Maltalia 3418:The Ogre 3360:Anatolia 3295:Asia A: 3276:Maltalia 3244:Asia(B) 3234:Asia(A) 3205:Maltalia 3172:The Ogre 3032:Jkliajmi 3006:Jkliajmi 2965:Jkliajmi 2932:Eurasian 2748:contribs 2736:unsigned 2353:Americas 2331:lists of 2279:and not 2267:and not 2255:and not 2068:Lastly, 2045:Americas 1867:Caucasia 1863:American 1857:, since 1841:in both 1817:Xaxafrad 1781:Xaxafrad 1519:Caucasus 1507:Americas 1455:Oceania 1421:unsigned 969:Americas 822:and the 818:, (the) 661:Cool Cat 604:Americas 593:Americas 559:cohesion 520:Mongolia 478:(yet no 360:Lucidity 30:template 3824:Merbabu 3781:Eurasia 3695:Regions 3644:Tropics 3621:Night w 3384:detail. 3351:or the 3329:Oceania 3118:again. 2923:Andeggs 2842:Andeggs 2665:Andeggs 2555:Andeggs 2517:Andeggs 2314:Andeggs 2252:Benelux 2139:Andeggs 2074:already 2041:regions 1974:Andeggs 1914:Andeggs 1871:Eurasia 1855:however 1742:neutral 1645:Siberia 1503:Eurasia 1438:Europe 1355:Africa 1312:wonder 985:balance 979:in the 973:Eurasia 618:Eurasia 597:Eurasia 484:choster 420:Shallot 388:Somalia 242:Infobox 200:Cleanup 3785:Africa 3750:Arctic 3725:Arctic 3567:Europe 3367:Israel 3219:zzuuzz 3191:zzuuzz 2675:SimonP 2602:Halibu 2396:oceans 2373:biased 2365:Europe 2276:Levant 2099:Hidden 2049:Europe 1875:Europe 1851:per se 816:Guinea 626:Europe 591:, yet 585:Europe 496:Russia 453:Asia: 402:Banyan 394:. The 372:SimonP 173:Assess 36:scale. 3686:dimmi 3605:Mttll 3337:Timor 3331:(see 3150:MAPS! 2859:David 2636:with 2572:David 2536:Temp3 2502:is a 2422:Temp3 2326:Temp3 2302:Temp3 2014:EDITS 1953:EDITS 1531:North 1397:Asia 971:with 873:Congo 820:Sudan 812:Congo 788:Congo 699:Congo 691:Congo 624:...; 610:...; 547:Congo 540:Congo 508:China 500:Japan 474:) or 298:Stubs 284:Photo 28:This 3845:talk 3828:talk 3808:talk 3727:and 3710:talk 3656:talk 3625:talk 3609:talk 3589:talk 3575:talk 3571:Huon 3556:talk 3537:talk 3503:talk 3482:talk 3449:talk 3422:talk 3373:)?!? 3362:)?!? 3309:)?!? 3302:)?!? 3280:talk 3209:talk 3176:talk 3140:talk 3124:talk 3109:talk 3095:talk 3071:talk 3036:talk 3010:talk 2988:talk 2969:talk 2950:talk 2919:NPOV 2887:and 2864:talk 2827:talk 2812:Pfly 2744:talk 2686:only 2651:Yath 2644:and 2466:talk 2405:talk 2385:talk 2369:Asia 2347:are 2308:and 2223:talk 2084:talk 2004:TALK 1943:TALK 1892:talk 1879:Asia 1877:and 1845:and 1763:talk 1706:talk 1695:The 1613:talk 1544:talk 1525:and 1517:and 1429:talk 1323:talk 1254:talk 1207:-ern 1191:talk 1155:talk 1123:talk 1045:talk 998:talk 929:talk 869:cite 797:talk 741:here 712:here 674:and 622:Asia 589:Asia 579:and 563:talk 553:and 528:talk 518:and 406:Tree 381:and 303:See 289:See 275:See 261:See 247:See 233:See 205:See 190:and 164:and 160:See 3822:--- 3817:OTT 3779:, 3752:), 3748:, 3380:?!? 3355:?!? 3339:?!? 3062:map 2731:? 2506:of 2349:too 2037:sub 1754:ern 1596:all 1314:WTF 1142:ern 1108:or 628:... 614:... 351:of 256:Map 3862:: 3847:) 3830:) 3810:) 3791:). 3787:, 3783:, 3769:, 3756:, 3712:) 3683:| 3658:) 3650:? 3627:) 3611:) 3591:) 3577:) 3558:) 3539:) 3505:) 3484:) 3451:) 3424:) 3282:) 3211:) 3178:) 3142:) 3126:) 3111:) 3097:) 3073:) 3038:) 3012:) 2990:) 2971:) 2963:. 2952:) 2750:) 2746:• 2649:-- 2605:tt 2598:// 2469:| 2463:| 2408:| 2402:| 2388:| 2382:| 2375:? 2273:? 2261:? 2226:| 2220:| 2208:, 2188:no 2102:}} 2096:{{ 2087:| 2081:| 2051:, 1929:. 1895:| 1889:| 1766:| 1760:| 1709:| 1703:| 1666:• 1658:// 1647:≈ 1639:≈ 1616:| 1610:| 1569:• 1561:// 1547:| 1541:| 1487:• 1479:// 1431:) 1348:. 1326:| 1320:| 1286:• 1278:// 1257:| 1251:| 1234:• 1226:// 1213:-Ø 1194:| 1188:| 1158:| 1152:| 1126:| 1120:| 1065:• 1057:// 1048:| 1042:| 1020:• 1012:// 1001:| 995:| 932:| 926:| 837:• 829:// 800:| 794:| 755:• 747:// 720:UN 620:: 606:: 561:| 530:) 514:, 510:, 506:, 498:, 447:, 443:, 184:}} 180:{{ 3843:( 3826:( 3806:( 3775:( 3760:. 3744:( 3708:( 3654:( 3623:( 3607:( 3587:( 3573:( 3554:( 3535:( 3527:" 3501:( 3480:( 3447:( 3420:( 3278:( 3207:( 3174:( 3138:( 3122:( 3107:( 3093:( 3069:( 3034:( 3008:( 2986:( 2967:( 2948:( 2866:) 2862:( 2829:) 2825:( 2742:( 2729:) 2725:( 2529:/ 2367:/ 2335:X 2039:/ 2019:| 2009:| 1999:| 1958:| 1948:| 1938:| 1533:/ 1505:/ 1427:( 1112:/ 1104:/ 1085:/ 587:/ 526:( 301:: 287:: 273:: 259:: 245:: 231:: 217:: 203:: 194:. 176:: 158:: 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index