1170:
Then I accuse you of putting it there =). I guess that's what happens when you don't take time to check the edit history. Fortunately, however, this is an interesting discussion, so I don't feel too bad for starting it. I agree with you on the fact that a "list of lists" or other quasi-category/navigational aid is fundamentally different from a list of U.S. presidents, for example, or even Tuf-kat's list. But the problem is that they have the same name. So it's easy to say "that doesn't belong here, it's a template, not an article" on FAC, but it's more difficult to say, "that doesn't belong on FLC, it's not the right kind of list". Do we want FLC to be renamed to something like "Featured
Creative List Candidates" or something? Or should we redefine the word "list" to exclude navigational aids? I'd love it if we could, but until then, people are going to say, "this is a list, and this is featured
1407:. Originally, he had over 50 pictures on each article. That's...50. And it was written chronologically like it was a newspaper article. So it was put on my taskforce desk. So I did major editing...cut it in half...and now SNIyer12 is slowly reverting all of my changes. And it's similar to Richard...I've told him several times not to do such and such because it is not what Knowledge is, but he keeps doing it anyway. What do you do with people like that? It's frustrating as hell. He keeps doing things like linking the same thing several times in the same article. Anyway, I think I deserve an award. :) I have to basically go into the articles every single day and undo his reverts. If you can help at all, please do so. --
510:, where you can find all the information related to this genus. And as to lumping so many species under one bullet : this is certainly not uncommon in such long lists. This avoids putting little known species between more important species (that at least have a common name). This also avoids, for the sake of brevity, a list with several hundred (or even more than a thousand) bullets.
1308:
article. Anyway, I think we should not touch the article for now. That way people can see just how unencyclopedic it is and all of that. Thanks for the post on the incident page. I really appreciate it. I have a feeling that RickK is going to do something about it. He's a very, very good admin and he's good at stuff like this. So we'll see. --
761:- no, that's not what I meant (and I was under the wrong impression that lists could in fact be transwikied), sorry about that. I do have those cats (and lists) I tagged on my to-do list, and I fully intend to go over them and tag individual words. I'd have done it yesterday except that I was busy cleaning up the month-and-a-half backlog on
202:) so valid users can edit from these terminals; usually I try to block them for no longer than 24 hours. (I've noticed that when it's evening here on the west coast of the U.S. there is a ton of vandalism from Australian schools.) When it is a static IP owned by, say, a cable customer, that's another thing entirely, and a long-term block
1287:
And see, Richardr443 wrote on the talk page about it and is now threatening to recreate the entire article. So I'm going to take the speedy delete off. I know it should be deleted, but this moron is going make my life hell (again) if it's speedy deleted. And actually as I typed this, the article just
1203:
Well, do you want to craft a proposal? I'm willing to work with you on one that we can present and have people discuss. Lately there seems to be less interest in debating stuff, so if we came up with a full proposal about what FLC should look like, with specific examples (list of lists bad, list of
1188:
But FPC is fundamentally different; you don't have to give a reason for an objection. That's because normally pictures are unalterable (except for minor quality issues), and it comes down to a matter of preference. On FAC, if any stubs get nominated, everyone will say "refer to peer review" or list
1145:
By saying that all objections must be actionable, you are saying that all lists are inherently featurable. For example, if I say "this list can not possibly have all the elements", then that's not actionable, because the nominator can't do anything about that. It's like objecting in FAC because the
694:
Hey, I was wondering if you could just help me out with a quick translation. I'm copying a good image from the German
Knowledge here. So I'm just trying to figure out what the caption says so I know what's going on. Could you tell me what "Darstellung der Beulenpest in der Toggenburgbibel" means? Its
31:
Yeah in the past couple weeks I've managed to stumble around and find most of that but the welcome is appreciated---the
Picture tutorial is a good thing to have. Something you might be able to help me with is figuring out what the notations next to my updates on the contributions page mean. I take it
1315:
Yep, amazing isn't it? And he hasn't really did squat outside of this article. You didn't see some of his comments while he was originally fighting the wikify tag that I put on the article. Believe it or not, what started this was me seeing letter writing on the articles to be wikified page. Anyway,
341:
This is a real grey area. Some admins delete items, others relist them on VfD. There is also the issue that our lawyers doubt that any form of the transwikiing process is in keeping with the GFDL. Personally I feel that most article can be safely deleted after being moved. Some sit for months before
314:
Hello
Dmcdevit. Thanks for the request to do something about the above. I have attempted to get it down to a reasonable length and have also learnt a lot about this event in so doing. I have made a comment on the discussion page of the article giving my reason for the manner in which I tackled it. I
1307:
page. I have no idea if it will go through or not, but I thought I'd give it a shot. Isn't
Richard fun? :) I don't want to make it sound like I blame for any of this, since eventually the interwiki link was going to have to be deleted and I knew all along that Richard would immediately recreate the
494:
You have requested for a cleanup of this page. At the bottom are all the accepted names without common names (at least as far as I know). This large genus is about to be split up in several genera. But this will take about another two years before this is official. In the mean time, I would suggest
1218:
Perhaps not; it could I suppose be considered institution creep to relentlessly hash out guidelines... on FAC people have differing criteria, and it all works out. I suppose we can see how it goes. Eventually, however, someone is going to put together a great, high-quality list of lists with no
1169:
Wow, I'm dumb. Apparently I've been looking at the FLC page for weeks without having noticed that it says right on it, "Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to 'fix' the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored."
1277:
I will keep the speedy deletion intact, but if the guy who kept trying to recreate the original article comes back...have fun. :) He literally put every article I've ever written up for deletion in retaliation. In early
February, I put the article up for vfd as a way of stopping this guy and the
1419:
Hi, I saw you leave a comment on the Admin's noticeboard and cleanup the
Translation into English page so thought I'd look you up, I like seeing who my fellow editors are. The 7 languages is not as impressive as it looks I'm afraid: Norwegian, Neo-Norwegian, Swedish and Danish are all mutually
835:
is hard to miss when you're on wiktionary for any length of time :) I was getting curious, I suppose, as to who was running it, so I only followed your links. Oh, BTW, I'm a bit ashamed of this user page of mine - nothing interesting there now, and has never been... But thanks for stopping by,
519:
It doesn't make sense, no matter what reason you give. It is not any briefer to have the same number of items, just in one bullet. Instead, it makes it into a massive text-dump-like block of letters that become nearly impossible to read, bulleting them makes it readable. And it's quite a cheap
1129:
Hey, I saw your addition to the FLC page. You included the part from FAC about all objections being actionable, so are we thus saying that all lists are inherently featurable? I think that that was the result of the discussion anyway, but I just wanted to verify that that was intended.
1150:
article on that topic should be featured. Their objections were discounted until they came up with objections to things that could be fixed. I tend to agree with you on the comprehensive thing; seems like a featured list should be completely comprehensive, but then I see good lists
1531:
deals with creating pages like "XXth United States
Congress", but none of the participants seem to have contributed to the project for almost a year now! Should I go ahead and do what I think is best? I'm not sure what to say to the official, signed-up participants. Thanks a bunch.
1204:
music genres by region good, list of presidents good, etc.), that would be helpful and would help us reach some sort of consensus. I won't have time to sit down to work on one until at least tomorrow evening (probably), but let me know what you think and we can get started. --
325:
I wasn't too worried about being
British when I got going with the rewrite - it was all very interesting, and I shall be quite happy to take on similar tasks. Thanks for the assistance with the pictures and extra info at the end. I shall be adding to my own page in due course.
445:
You're preaching to the choir. No bad feelings about the Dacian list? :) The list itself was about the same. In any case, perhaps a VfD listing, I know it sounds harsh, but that'll be the eventual end for the article anyway, will help to stimulate something. Have you seen
889:
into 1000 articles, per your request. If you want, I can make it even longer, but i can also modufy my program to automatically sort it into categories. Why don't you give me some, and some condition it should satisfy (like "if title starts with X it should go into Y).
1504:
Hi there! I've done a couple of articles, good luck with them. I believe that all those I've tagged should not be kept in
Wikispace (delete or redirect somewhere sensible) but I'll leave that up to the xwiki team. Or VfD, if it must. And sorry for the delay. Yours,
87:
While I can respect not wishing to be gladhanded, as you put it, or berated, neither seems to really merit the level of vehemence you responded with. Mostly, it would've been better to post this on the talk page rather than the user page so I'll put it there now.
315:
have a set of Collier's Encyclopaedia which gave me a much less detailed account of the Rebellion, so could see the wood for the trees (and no I didn't do anything illegal!!). I'd be glad of your comments on the result. I wasn't sure about a picture though?
172:
Thanks for the note - isn't it nice when you someone gets in touch? Can you clarify about the tag point and the User:user comment? - I can't see what this is - dimbo! I'm not a Practhet fan - I'll have to look into this! Kind regards 18:48, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
1038:
Okay, tone down the language and let's have a peaceful discussion. On the FL criteria page where it should be, and where I have responded. As I said, I am working this out myself, and not necessarily opposing you, so stop trying to bully other people.
1073:
Without the source code or linking me to the source code, I really can't help that much. You'll have to also provide me a detailed description of what is wrong with the bot. Even if I have the code, I can only hope that Kevin commented it out well.
972:
Knowledge article. Why is Knowledge less able to be "comprehensive" than any external source would be? Hundreds of mathematicians work on Knowledge. Obviously they cannot make the list complete. A far smaller number of mathematicians work on the
156:
Ack! I know... Can't stop... And I have the three most important tests I have ever taken, that determine whether I get my IB diploma, on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednseday. (Darn you, Biology!). And I'll graduate (from puny high school) on the 26th!
366:
on to the article page, or if that is considered to large and bulky, a smaller template with similar content? I can't see how this is different from {{vfd}}, {{npov}}, {{cleanup}}, and friends which are not hidden on the talk page, either.
743:
Hi there! I understand that you can't just transwiki a whole cat, I just wanted to bring the cats to the attention of the transwikefactors. If I have some spare time, I'll look through them and mark some articles as transwikable. Yours,
505:
By the above message I didn't imply anything, certainly not you doing anything on purpose. Don't be so over-sensitive. This is just a list, and nothing more. A list doesn't need any further information. This list belongs to the article
264:, so I wouldn't be surprised to see many more appear on this list. I've stubbed out a couple more from the Whyte types list, and I'm slowly adding information for the EMD diesel types as well as articles for other railroads as shown on
931:
Ok, thanks for the explanation, but I was wondering what happens afterwards; there is a difference between 'move to wikt' and 'copy to wikt'. Are wikt'ed articles rewritten? Merged? VfD'ed? Are they speediable? If not, should they be?
1295:
It's ok. I probably overreacted a little. But yes, why people go off when we put something on another of the Wiki sites, I dunno. The original article was literally a step by step on how to write a letter. Doesn't exactly fit here.
963:
This objection is absurd. How could a reference guarantee that all subjects are there?? It is impossible for all topics to be covered in any encyclopedia. And if there is some reason why a semi-important religious figure should
1056:
Hey there, sorry about how long it's taken to respond. I'm at a place in my life where I just don't have any time to dedicate to either Knowledge, Wiktionary, or fixing that dang bot. I hope to someday get at it again. Sorry.
58:
I despise gladhanding and backslapping ("Hi! Welcome! Glad you could be here! We would all love to suck you cock!" ) -- it makes me gag; please don't do it again. Feel free to delete this comment after you've read it.
181:
Please be specific in what you want to be cleaned up about this article, preferably on the articles "talk" page. It's hard to be very literary in creating an article on a small, prosaic, but nonetheless notable river.
1189:
a long string of problems, but they won't say, "this article can never be featured, regardless of how much work you do and how good it gets". Thus, all nondeletable articles can be featured. Am I making sense? --
569:
The "Great Plague" redirect set up was around when I arrived. A disamig page should be just fine, since there are other "Great Plagues" as well. These are the ones that I know about. There are probably others.
551:." Many of the Italian cities (Venice, Florence, Bologna, and throughout Lombardy) were hit just as hard as Milan but, because of its trading empire, its outbreak is better known. Hope the info helps.
1323:
Yay! CesarB has put a tag on it that I've never seen before. Basically says that the page should not be recreated and that if you want to recreate it, you need to discuss it with the community first. --
1146:
article isn't comprehensive but you don't say what it's missing. Your objection will be immediately thrown away. It's also like what happened with the Starfleet article - people didn't think that
476:
No bad feelings about the Dacian list, because it would've happened eventually & I even thought of removing the list before to avoid the whole situation. I forgot to mention another item:
1031:
to try to list all math topics "out there". And silly, IMO. You may as well ask whether Knowledge is comprehensive in the sense of having an article on every possible subject "out there".
547:
I dug out a little more information on this outbreak in Vienna and added it to your new article. If we want to do something about Milan in 1629, it might be better to rename it the "
1251:! I was pleasantly surprised by the sheer number of supporters (including several people that usually disagree with my opinion). I shall do my best with the proverbial mop. Yours,
902:
Cheers mate, I don't think you are stupid and I very much appreciate the feedback. I'll look into getting this resolved soon. In the meantime, could I ask you to sneak a peak at
679:
page. If you would, please look over what I said and what he wrote on the article page, and maybe chime in with your ideas. In my mind this could be a big effort. Thanks.
105:
want to sign up. Fine with me, as I don't think disruptive users really deserve the hearty welcome I gave you. By the way, I don't think either I or Pioneer appreciated your
76:
It's none of your business, fuckface . That you have nothing better to do than berate some IP address for lacking gratitude strongly indicates serious neurosis of your own.
1495:
520:
procedure to simply explain what it means. Lists are for information and navigation; in its current state, this list hardly does either with its bottom half. Take a look at
244:
Well, you certainly found someone interested in adding railroad content. I've been creating and updating railroad data almost exclusively (and I list pages that I create on
903:
992:
Maybe you misunderstood me. If you have a list of something, then it is quite possible to ascertain its comprehensiveness, by how well it covers the topic. But, a list
402:
Thanks for the help with the Black Death page. You took the religion section exactly in the direction I wanted to go (but I lacked a few key facts to take it there).
886:
675:
Hi - regarding our Plague sorting/organization effort and the pages that Wetman initiated. He and I are looking at organizational and topic alternatives on the
1446:
273:
269:
447:
920:
805:, I'm wondering how the transwiki cleanup process actually works... could you please explain to me what happens to an article after it gets botted into
1316:
his comments were about making wikipedia into a real encyclopedia and that all encyclopedias had articles like this and all of this other nonsense. --
1174:
candidates, so why are you saying that my list can never be featured?" From a practical standpoint, as things currently stand, they have a point. --
330:
1270:
161:
451:
416:
1450:
1152:
261:
101:. I'm not sure there's any point in resonding to this. But don't worry, I wouldn't normally welcome anyone twice! I suppose that you means you
1280:] is the vfd discussion on it. If you still want to speedy delete it, go ahead, but as I said, if Richard pulls this crap again, have fun. --
860:. Looks perfect to me. Because it is on the article page, it is extra work, but it would provide a simple (bot-work) and permanent solution.
481:
436:
1339:
states that it is a dictionary entry, not an encyclopaedic one. As I disagreed with this, I removed the notices along with my explanation.
67:
891:
463:
459:
669:
117:
92:
1445:
to the image description page, and drop a note at the uploader's talk page asking for information. For example, I decided not to delete
470:
532:
389:
252:). I suspect that most of the railroad articles showing up on your list are the result of the footer navigation templates, especially
1400:
514:
1404:
342:
they are transwikied, and are sometimes considerably altered in that time, in this case they should probably be relisted on VfD. -
113:, and come back and say hi when you're willing to help. Thanks for taking the time to respond to my welcome, I love new friends. --
234:
428:
564:
977:, which has a far less complete set of mathematical topics. And why would external references be any more important here than
683:
659:
555:
477:
319:
150:
874:
143:
when I get a chance. And by the way, um, you are not supposed to be editing (and I counted 53 edits from you so far today). —
717:
Ah. Thanks a bunch. I wanted to know where it came from. Quick service is appreciated! :) --Dmcdevit 05:11, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
499:
210:
1001:
910:
406:
63:
What the hell? I think user 68.6.40.203 is a somewhat disturbed individual. Someone says "hi" and this is the response? -
304:
186:
1351:
Would it be possible NOT to transwiki items that we already have? It just adds to the confusion. Today you have dumped
842:
360:
371:
1528:
521:
199:
It does appear that this user(s) is a problem. Unfortunately, these IPs belong to schools in Melbourne, Australia (
1008:
have all WP's lists of mathematical topics, but that doesn't mean it is comprehensive in that it covers all of the
109:, as I can tell by your edits that you definitely know what a talk page is, so use them! I also recommend you see
1304:
484:
455:
439:
292:. I like that a lot. Thank you. One thing I've learned is to always take recommendations from people who like
215:
864:
732:
710:
540:
489:
951:
That's a good point. If a list of lists were comprehensive (i.e. has all the lists on WP), it might still not
1110:
376:
110:
856:
but didn't get an answer yet. However, I have just seen an alternative solution for transwikied articles in
560:
Hi Dmcdevit, sorry, I dont have any resorces on this at the moment, will keep it in mind if I come across.
955:
comprehensive (i.e. what if WP doesn't have all the needed lists?) so featuring it would be misleading. --
309:
283:
1085:
I'd be happy to do it, but you might have to wait awhile as my To Do list is rather big at the moment. --
623:
548:
349:
1000:
are covered, it is another thing to say that all those (listed) lists are comprehensive. What I mean is
1390:
191:
147:
135:
Thanks, D! Yeah, "real life" has gotten busy but I'll still make time for Knowledge. I've got to merge
1219:
references and we'll have to make a decision. Or we can abstain, and avoid the issue altogether =). --
826:
427:
Hey what's up. I'm trying to get a group of Wikipedians together to agree on moving articles such as
176:
1384:
1435:
Hi Dmcdevit. Great work listing unverified orphans on IFD! But when you do that, you need to add
974:
216:
1096:
695:
from the Black Death page at de:Schwarzer_Tod. Thanks a lot. --Dmcdevit 05:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
1449:(which you listed on June 6), since it looks like a user photo. I instead asked the uploader,
1062:
642:
608:
541:
528:. And I don't know why you think I was sensitive; I never said you accused me of anything... --
130:
49:
1268:
381:
Not only am I from the same region and in the same year of education as you, I'll be going to
336:
996:
on Knowledge is much different. Because, while it is quite easy to say that all of the lists
847:
386:
144:
1335:
If you want to copy information to Wiktionary, that's fine with me, but the notice you used
782:- it's really lengthy but concerns only etymology and rhyming; what should be done with it?
1224:
1209:
1194:
1179:
1160:
1135:
917:
907:
257:
253:
8:
1484:
1473:
1119:
1089:
1078:
688:
403:
397:
350:
265:
249:
1346:
1242:
200:
1509:
1458:
1255:
1032:
985:
936:
897:
817:
786:
769:
748:
422:
327:
316:
289:
245:
1491:
1480:
Fire me an email at me first, then I'll reply with a reminder what I need from you. --
1330:
968:
be listed, the same thing happens as when material that should not be there is put in
665:
Created the "Italian Plague of 1629-1631" stub. I will try and add more info later.
1106:
1058:
853:
301:
140:
17:
1408:
1340:
1324:
1317:
1309:
1297:
1289:
1281:
1220:
1205:
1190:
1175:
1156:
1131:
525:
231:
64:
1464:
832:
796:
239:
1481:
1470:
1423:
Anyway, happy to help someone who likes keeping the place tidy. See you around
1114:
1086:
1075:
759:"I'd rather just stick up a tag and forget about it so someone else can do it."
727:
705:
561:
207:
1533:
1506:
1454:
1396:
1252:
1040:
1013:
956:
933:
814:
783:
779:
766:
762:
745:
680:
666:
656:
552:
529:
467:
413:
158:
114:
1068:
1512:
1439:
1258:
1102:
939:
820:
810:
789:
772:
751:
297:
183:
98:
89:
44:
1356:
676:
343:
277:
1527:
Hi! Thanks for your note, I appreciate it. I do have one question: the
857:
837:
511:
496:
1430:
1124:
945:
738:
723:
701:
700:
It means "Illustration of bubonic plague in the Toggenburg Bible". --
136:
1522:
1051:
435:: he had tried to get it transferred to Wiktionary some months ago.
1424:
802:
382:
293:
260:
and others. We've got quite a few navigation templates as shown on
167:
1352:
871:
861:
432:
431:(which has gotten out of hand) out of Knowledge. I also notified
368:
1469:
I haven't received an email from you... nor have I saw one. --
495:
to leave the list as it is and to remove the cleanup template.
507:
55:
880:
1364:
926:
1380:
1368:
1360:
904:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Windows 2000/archive1
806:
206:
in order. If he vandalises again tonight I'll block him.
26:
1376:
1395:
Besides Richard, I am also dealing with this user named
983:
article, making sure everything is there that should be?
356:
Sorry, and thanks for reminding me again. Can't we slap
1248:
579:
causal agent: bubonic plague/smallpox/measles/typhus??
1420:intelligible so you only really need to learn one.
36:
is "minor edit" but what about the other stuff like
1414:
262:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains/Article templates
1278:solution was to keep it as a wiki interlink.
56:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:68.6.40.203
1288:got deleted. So here we go again. Thanks. --
464:List of Greek words with English derivatives
460:List of Latin words with English derivatives
1303:Well I put a permanent ban request on the
1247:Thank you for voting on my RFA. Have some
1401:Death and state funeral of Pierre Trudeau
1367:on us to be deleted. And did you look at
1012:out there, just the ones in Knowledge. --
870:Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation.
778:English words cat done. Please check out
1405:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan
412:'Twas a useful tidbit. Happy editing! --
288:On your recommendation, I just now read
429:List of English words of Spanish origin
248:and graphics that I create for them on
14:
634:Great Plague of Scotland (1348-1350)
478:List of English words of French origin
906:and make comments on this article? -
222:Shal stop deletion as requested, but
120:(PS, I think you misquoted me above.)
1399:. He wrote 2 articles. One is named
1101:It was not me that moved it, it was
1002:List of lists of mathematical topics
916:Sure, I'll do Port Jackson next :-)
722:No problem! That'll be ten bucks. --
619:Great Plague of Milan (1629-1631)
600:Great Plague of Ireland (1348-1351)
592:Great Plague of Iceland (1402-1404)
584:Great Plague of England (1348-1350)
576:Great Plague of Athens (430-427 BC)
1023:I understood you very well. It is
836:anyway, and see you on wiktionary.
801:Hi there! After some discussion at
226:has to be done with this page: the
23:
24:
1545:
1453:, for more information. Thanks,
522:Knowledge:What is a featured list
1004:may be comprehensive in that it
456:List of Islamic terms in Arabic
13:
1:
648:causal agent: bubonic plague
637:causal agent: bubonic plague
629:causal agent: bubonic plague
614:causal agent: bubonic plague
603:causal agent: bubonic plague
595:causal agent: bubonic plague
587:causal agent: bubonic plague
385:at Reed College this summer.
111:Knowledge:No personal attacks
1391:I'm a glutton for punishment
1385:wiktionary:User:SemperBlotto
7:
1403:and the other one is named
1097:Transwiki of conspiracy nut
1065:) 23:20, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
624:Italian Plague of 1629-1631
549:Italian Plague of 1629-1631
10:
1550:
1519:11:19, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
1427:21:09, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
942:11:52, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
894:00:38, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
823:08:42, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
754:08:50, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
346:02:14, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
337:Deleting after a transwiki
280:16:56, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
228:moved to en.wiktionary.org
54:re your comments to me at
1536:03:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1476:06:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1461:19:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1411:20:44, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1343:09:39, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1327:19:15, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1320:08:09, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1312:07:50, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1300:07:18, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1292:05:46, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1284:00:15, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1265:08:03, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1230:10:45, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
1215:23:38, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1200:19:44, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1185:12:14, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1166:01:01, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1141:00:23, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
1113:). I'm moving it back.
792:12:14, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
775:07:30, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
361:Transwikied to Wiktionary
1487:16:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1375:Today, you have sent us
1121:07:11, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
1081:04:12, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1035:21:50, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
988:00:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
921:08:17, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
911:07:57, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
875:19:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
865:08:09, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
843:08:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
733:05:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
711:05:04, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
684:01:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
670:20:11, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
660:19:35, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
565:05:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
556:00:59, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
533:00:22, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
515:18:28, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
500:14:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
485:02:05, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
471:00:41, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
440:12:16, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
417:19:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
407:17:26, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
390:06:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
372:06:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
331:06:23, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
320:19:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
305:02:43, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
235:08:51, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
211:04:11, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1529:WikiProject US Congress
1383:which we already have.
1347:Transwiki to Wiktionary
1243:Thanks for your support
1092:04:55, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1043:21:56, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1016:00:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
975:Encyclopedia Brittanica
959:20:10, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
230:section alone is 122k!
217:Knowledge:Transwiki log
187:04:04, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
162:17:03, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
151:06:44, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
118:22:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
93:18:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
68:08:51, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
42:16:37, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
1331:Transfer to Wiktionary
1155:, and I'm not sure. --
643:Great Plague of Vienna
609:Great Plague of London
542:Great Plague of Vienna
490:List of Acacia species
1305:Vandalism in progress
887:User:Gkhan/Mostwanted
377:Even more interesting
1447:Image:AXthree001.JPG
258:Template:EMD diesels
254:Template:Whyte types
1010:mathematical topics
797:Transwiki process q
351:Finger licking good
274:Template:US class 3
270:Template:US class 2
266:Template:US class 1
250:User:Slambo/Gallery
240:Railroad data pages
1496:move to wiktionary
448:Nahuatl dictionary
246:User:Slambo/Trains
192:User 210.11.188.20
1465:Re: Transwiki bot
1229:
1214:
1199:
1184:
1165:
1140:
1069:Re: Transwiki bot
854:User talk:Uncle G
852:I left a note on
827:The transwiki bot
310:Bacon's Rebellion
290:Tichborne's Elegy
284:Tichborne's Elegy
177:Barren Fork River
141:Medical residency
18:User talk:Dominic
1541:
1517:
1500:
1494:
1444:
1438:
1263:
1227:
1223:
1212:
1208:
1197:
1193:
1182:
1178:
1163:
1159:
1138:
1134:
1117:
885:I just expanded
840:
387:PlatypeanArchcow
365:
359:
145:Knowledge Seeker
97:Thanks for that
1549:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1525:
1514:
1502:
1498:
1492:
1467:
1442:
1436:
1433:
1417:
1393:
1349:
1333:
1275:
1260:
1245:
1225:
1210:
1195:
1180:
1161:
1136:
1127:
1115:
1099:
1071:
1054:
948:
929:
918:Ta bu shi da yu
908:Ta bu shi da yu
900:
883:
850:
838:
833:wikt:User:McBot
831:Actually, your
829:
799:
741:
730:
708:
691:
545:
526:Knowledge:Lists
492:
425:
400:
379:
363:
357:
354:
339:
312:
286:
242:
220:
194:
179:
170:
133:
52:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1547:
1524:
1521:
1501:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1466:
1463:
1432:
1431:Listing on IFD
1429:
1416:
1413:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1371:? Good grief.
1348:
1345:
1332:
1329:
1274:
1271:Letter writing
1267:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1126:
1125:FLC objections
1123:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1070:
1067:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1018:
1017:
961:
960:
947:
946:Lists of lists
944:
928:
925:
924:
923:
899:
896:
882:
879:
878:
877:
849:
846:
828:
825:
809:and listed on
798:
795:
794:
793:
776:
740:
739:Transwiki cats
737:
736:
735:
728:
714:
713:
706:
690:
687:
673:
672:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
645:(1679-1680's)
640:
639:
638:
632:
631:
630:
627:
617:
616:
615:
606:
605:
604:
598:
597:
596:
590:
589:
588:
582:
581:
580:
544:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
491:
488:
474:
473:
424:
421:
420:
419:
404:Hiberniantears
399:
396:
394:
378:
375:
353:
348:
338:
335:
334:
333:
311:
308:
285:
282:
241:
238:
219:
214:
193:
190:
178:
175:
169:
166:
165:
164:
132:
131:Re: graduation
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
80:
79:
78:
77:
71:
70:
51:
50:From user page
48:
43:
41:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1546:
1537:
1535:
1530:
1523:Wikiprojects?
1520:
1518:
1511:
1508:
1497:
1486:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1462:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1441:
1428:
1426:
1421:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1328:
1326:
1321:
1319:
1313:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1272:
1266:
1264:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1228:
1222:
1217:
1216:
1213:
1207:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1167:
1164:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1133:
1122:
1120:
1118:
1116:→ Ingoolemo ←
1112:
1111:contributions
1108:
1104:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1066:
1064:
1060:
1052:Transwiki Bot
1042:
1037:
1036:
1034:
1033:Michael Hardy
1030:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
987:
986:Michael Hardy
984:
982:
976:
971:
967:
958:
954:
950:
949:
943:
941:
938:
935:
922:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
909:
905:
895:
893:
888:
876:
873:
869:
868:
867:
866:
863:
859:
855:
848:{{wi}} maybe?
845:
844:
841:
834:
824:
822:
819:
816:
812:
808:
804:
791:
788:
785:
781:
780:Orange (word)
777:
774:
771:
768:
764:
760:
757:
756:
755:
753:
750:
747:
734:
731:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
712:
709:
703:
699:
698:
697:
696:
686:
685:
682:
678:
671:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
658:
647:
646:
644:
641:
636:
635:
633:
628:
625:
621:
620:
618:
613:
612:
610:
607:
602:
601:
599:
594:
593:
591:
586:
585:
583:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
567:
566:
563:
558:
557:
554:
550:
543:
534:
531:
527:
523:
518:
517:
516:
513:
509:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
487:
486:
483:
479:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:Shabo lexicon
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
438:
434:
430:
418:
415:
414:User:Dmcdevit
411:
410:
409:
408:
405:
395:
392:
391:
388:
384:
374:
373:
370:
362:
352:
347:
345:
332:
329:
328:Peter Shearan
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
317:Peter Shearan
307:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
218:
213:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:Hi Dmcdevit,
189:
188:
185:
174:
163:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
142:
138:
119:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
94:
91:
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
60:
57:
47:
46:
39:
35:
19:
1526:
1503:
1468:
1451:User:Alezane
1434:
1422:
1418:
1394:
1350:
1336:
1334:
1322:
1314:
1302:
1294:
1286:
1276:
1246:
1171:
1147:
1128:
1100:
1072:
1059:Kevin Rector
1055:
1028:
1024:
1009:
1005:
998:on Knowledge
997:
993:
980:
978:
969:
965:
962:
952:
930:
901:
884:
851:
830:
800:
758:
742:
716:
715:
693:
692:
674:
655:
611:(1664-1665)
568:
559:
546:
493:
475:
426:
401:
393:
380:
355:
340:
313:
287:
243:
227:
223:
221:
203:
198:
195:
180:
171:
168:Brookie Here
134:
106:
102:
53:
37:
33:
30:
1409:Woohookitty
1357:ego surfing
1341:Warofdreams
1325:Woohookitty
1318:Woohookitty
1310:Woohookitty
1298:Woohookitty
1290:Woohookitty
1282:Woohookitty
1029:undesirable
689:German help
677:Talk:Plague
398:Black Death
1337:explicitly
1221:Spangineer
1206:Spangineer
1191:Spangineer
1176:Spangineer
1157:Spangineer
1132:Spangineer
1025:impossible
898:PR comment
881:Mostwanted
858:Red-handed
423:Wiktionary
232:Physchim62
65:Pioneer-12
1482:AllyUnion
1471:AllyUnion
1226:(háblame)
1211:(háblame)
1196:(háblame)
1181:(háblame)
1162:(háblame)
1137:(háblame)
1087:AllyUnion
1076:AllyUnion
927:Transwiki
765:. Yours,
562:Stbalbach
466:, too? --
224:something
208:Antandrus
137:Residency
107:vandalism
1534:Eweisser
1455:dbenbenn
1397:SNIyer12
1153:this one
1041:Dmcdevit
1014:Dmcdevit
994:of lists
957:Dmcdevit
839:\Mike(z)
803:Verboten
681:WBardwin
667:WBardwin
657:WBardwin
553:WBardwin
530:Dmcdevit
468:Dmcdevit
383:Mathcamp
296:. :-)
294:Invictus
159:Dmcdevit
115:Dmcdevit
27:Hey babe
1353:ologist
1273:article
1103:Noitall
433:Uncle G
298:SWAdair
184:Rlquall
40:, etc?
1510:adiant
1485:(talk)
1474:(talk)
1256:adiant
1090:(talk)
1079:(talk)
937:adiant
818:adiant
787:adiant
770:adiant
763:WP:TFD
749:adiant
729:comhrá
707:comhrá
524:, and
508:Acacia
482:Decius
437:Decius
344:SimonP
278:slambo
1516:|<
1515:: -->
1365:toady
1262:|<
1261:: -->
892:gkhan
811:WP:TL
512:JoJan
497:JoJan
302:Talk
103:don't
38:(top)
16:<
1459:talk
1381:noor
1379:and
1369:push
1363:and
1361:push
1269:The
1172:list
1107:talk
1063:talk
1027:and
1006:does
807:Wikt
724:Angr
702:Angr
622:aka
272:and
139:and
1440:ifd
1425:Rje
1377:meh
1249:pie
1148:any
981:any
979:in
970:any
966:not
1499:}}
1493:{{
1457:|
1443:}}
1437:{{
1415:Hi
1359:,
1355:,
1296:--
1130:--
1109:·
1074:--
1039:--
953:be
940:_*
872:Rl
862:Rl
821:_*
813:?
790:_*
773:_*
752:_*
480:.
462:,
458:,
454:,
450:,
369:Rl
364:}}
358:{{
300:|
276:.
268:,
256:,
204:is
157:--
1513:_
1507:R
1259:_
1253:R
1105:(
1061:(
934:R
815:R
784:R
767:R
746:R
726:/
704:/
626:.
148:দ
99:Ø
90:Ø
45:Ø
34:m
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.