User talk:Ekem/Archive-101

335:

epithelium, mutant allele, ATP, etc. all in the first paragraph without any explanation other than wikilinks! Likewise, the German spills into autosomal recessive, chloride channel, exocrine glands without any mention of symptoms. If this were a medical textbook, this might be okay. However, one of the criticisms often brought up in peer review and featured article candidacies for medical articles is the use of jargon and technical terms without explanation. Unfortunately, this often leads to more wordy explanations of key terms and concepts when a single word would otherwise suffice. As for gene mutations - since there are more than a thousand described, listing a few seems to serve little purpose, though you're welcome to add anything that you think is germane! Thanks again for the help.

647:

little interest to me but those that do are of immense value. It is good to know that some Third World child who has access to the Internet can read them. I will, however, take the monitor's instructions into consideration and make sure any TE articles that I may post on Knowledge have 1)book references and 2)can't be easily sourced elsewhere on the Internet. TE articles which don't contain references would not be considered credible since their information cannot be verified even though I know from the quality of their articles that Jimmy Dunn and his TE team do peform much academic research--on Ancient Egyptian history at least--before they place articles online. Fabian

1502: 1128: 620:

related web sites but he doesn't seem to care about this inconsistency. Its a painful discussion. It looks like the rest of the world can google and access any Egypt related matter by TourEgypt but Knowledge users are now banned from accessibng it on Knowledge. Most TourEgypt stories show up in the Top 10 or 20 list of searches on Google but Betacommand does care about this as he hasn't even bothered to make a response on the discussion here fora t least 2 full days.

410:....this is not true, even from the POV of hamers supporters because they claim that such a DHS should always be visibile in CT brain scans, but not in any MRI. It is a fact that hamer never tried to prove his CT ring artefacts by comparing them to any MRI scan. I worked (after my study of human medicine) in radiology several years, and i know these ring artefacts very well. I worked also with a Somatom of Siemens. Ring artefacts can occur in older ct scanners if: 2692: 2579: 509:

So I became a WIkipedia member and gathered some serious information and wrote a new one. :) I am sceptical to the Alternative views section. What do you think about it? There is a girl that insists it to be present. Do you think that PMS could be socially constructed - meaning that women become sick because they think they are supposed to? (See the talk section.) In that case and anyway, that section should be improved by a better presentation...

3761: 3570: 3466: 299:. If you would like to discuss the current way that medical articles are constructed, please add your thoughts at the page. Featured articles also typically follow the manual of style, which prefers that headings contain more than one paragraph, etc. I will probably end up changing some of the structural additions that you made, but hope to keep the places where you improved the language, etc. Please let me know what you think! 1628: 1431: 704: 3960: 3533: 3316: 3259: 2908: 2867: 2825: 2324: 2269: 2104: 2765: 2569:

not Madonna or a vanity Fair pop culture celebrity, his life is meticulously documented. His son Paul Robeson jr is the one whom he told his recollections to. Not Horwowitz. I have kept the section very balanced, please cite sources that actually had real sources. There are plenty of anti-communist references in that section to keep it 'balanced.' Thanks Catherine Hubescher 06:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

1968: 1678: 3168: 2646: 1567:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Knowledge, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message. -- 508:

Dear Ekem; Thank you for your contributions on the PMS page! I liked them very much. The suggestions looks good and made improvements to the page. Are you a doctor? I had a look on the page a couple of weeks ago in order to find out more about PMS and was shocked, because the page then was just crap.

3724:

is, as you say, a part of the Mahdian crusade. As the Mahdian crusade was a true crusade but has no own lemma, wouldn't it be more systematical to move "Siege of Mahdia" to lemma "Mahdian Crusade" and list it among the crusades in lemma "Crusades", where it is not mentioned at the moment? Only a few

487:

much more in balance. I think you know what you are talking about, so allow me to ask you some questions. I still have some doubts on other dating results of Chinese homonoid fossiles. For the so-called Renzidong man there has been made a Chinese claim of more than two million years, for the Nihewan

334:

I read the Spanish, French, German, Dutch, and Swedish versions. While I agree that they are nice examples of well-written introductions, they invariably fail to explain critical terminology in a non-scientific manner. Take, for instance, the French use of recessive genetic disease, exocrine glands,

3777:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

3586:

2568:

Hi, Horwitz cites no sources and when measured against NINE different Robeson biographers, that have all said Robeson expressed not one word on any record publically or private that he felt shame about not helping Feffer. a line like "Robeson felt shame his whole life.." is not credible. Robeson is

996:

article. Last month I did some further work, including relegating the "Carlson" Travel agency references to the footnote they deserve. If you have any further information (or are able to extract it from the French/similar articles) then I'm sure it would benefit further. Just thought I'd let you

294:

I noticed your restructuring of the cystic fibrosis article and appreciate your input. The Medical Project has been working on bringing it up to featured article status! Several of the changes are less than ideal in that sense, however. Medical articles use an agreed-upon template which is found at

4077:

and the edit following -- there is already an entire article on the epidemiology of bedbugs. What you've added isn't wrong, but ... this article has a long and sorry history people adding unsubstantiated claims, and we try to stay on top of that kind of thing. Perhaps you could get a citation or

1379:

I was actually replacing the stub tag that was already there (a generic medicine one) with a more specific tag (cancer-stub), as I was working my way through cleaning up the medicine stubs category. I have no background in medicine, and was just doing routine maintenance work. If you want to take

309:

I saw your note and went ahead and placed the sections back in the original order. The template is nice, but I do agree that some diseases probably work better in a different order! I blended your comments in the different sections to help flow, but I've currently reverted the entire introduction.

646:

You are welcome Ekem. I hope the blacklist on this web site is lifted as the the Wikimedia monitor indicated but prefer to wait a few days before attempt to restore any TE linked web sites. I don't want to be accused--unfairly I might add--of being a spam mer since many of the articles on TE have

619:

Here is a long discussion on the reasons why touregypt.net linked sites were suddenly banned--without any prior notice--from Knowledge. Apparently some Admin. named Betacommmand placed it on the blacklist because he thinks it carries too much Ad links. (ie: Spam) Unfortunately, so does most Egypt

3016:

if you have the DOI. The default Template filling values work, but select Add URL. It can be glitchy if the load on the NIH servers is too high. It can do book and web cites too. The Citation BOT or DOI bot is good for a final cleanup after adding cites – it will fill in fields that the template

354:

saw any images of C. F. Wolff, except for a couple of silhouettes, drawn by some 18th century St Petersburg artist. It is widely believed that these two or three silhouettes are the only images of Wolff survived to date. Could you provide the source? Besides, the dress and hairstyle look a bit

2428:

Nice article! A couple of sources which you may be unaware of which you could use to expand the article a bit. Plimsoll Ship Data has copies of Lloyd's Register which give details such as Official Numbers, Code Letters, Tonnage, measurements, operators, builders, etc. The index of entries for

656:

Dear Ekem, Thanks for your comment on WikiMedia. It was well received by the participants--although I was too busy with work to read it until Friday after the dispute was resolved. The blacklist on TE has indeed been lifted. However, from now on, I will scrutinise any TE linked articles for

2471:

If the ship is still active generally go with current name - unless there was any significant event under a former name or the ship spent a very long time under a former name. Create redirects for all names to article, both with and without prefix, link from disambig pages as necessary.

572:

No, it is not supposed. As our PMS page says, ""PMS" redirects here. For other uses, see PMS (disambiguation)." So when you type in "pms" in small letters, you are supposed to arrive at our PMS page, as this is the most common meaning of "pms". Instead now, you arrive at an empty page:

2401:

There is no obligation to inform anyone in advance of the deletion of an article that does not meet the guidelines. If you want me to restore the article, I would need to feel some confidence that you are able to make it meet the guidelines. Otherwise, you could always take it to a

324:

gives us a nice guide about the commonly accepted role of the introduction. It may not always make sense that the introduction should be a summary of the salient points in an article, but most of the featured articles that I've read/been a part of follow this part of the MoS closely.

3999:

I'm really sorry for reverting your edit. You are right the proper usage is "on" not "around", and I did not intend to call it vandalism. I was actually trying to rollback two edits by an anon editor before you, somehow your edit got caught in that. I have corrected that line again.

3379:, I was hoping you might have an interest in the above article. The sources seems quite clear, but there are long-standing disputes over it. Would you be interested in getting involved? I'll also be asking Alteripse as well, again based on the recommendation from Wolff. 3146:

so that people who primarily work on the several very well done ships related articles may weigh in at MOS. Thus, please hold off before adding a guideline to the Manual of Style so the project members have time to respond at your MOS talk thread. Thanks –

523:. Yes, I am a physician. In principle I would leave the alternative section simply because there are differing views on PMS, perhaps more in the non-medical community, so that could be elaborated there. And I agree, in its current form it needs more work. 488:

man 1.5 million years and for the Lantian man 1,6 million years. As a result of these findings Chinese scientists developed the so called Asian hypothesis, claiming an emergence of homonoids in East Asia parallel to an emergence of homonoids in Africa.(

310:

The introduction strives to summarize the entire article without being to wordy - I think maybe the best one is between our two. I'll give it a closer look later, but think that much of what was excised in your rendition should probably remain, IMHO.

795:

1.5!), but I'm no expert. And yes, the article does have some issues that require more in-depth revisions. If you do find some time, I'm sure the article could benefit from a third-party critique. Again, your contribution is greatly appreciated.

253:

Why, pray tell, did an established member of Knowledge such as yourself delete two DYK submissions in two edits? Since it was in two edits, it shows that it was not a mere accident, but rather a more sinister agenda. Please tell me why? Regards,

2003: 726:

seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

3329: 2490:

Just a quick note to say the the Plimsol Ship Data link above has links to the Lloyd's Register entries, just click on the links to see them - the links are in the format of 99z9999. This is where the info I mentioned can be found.

319:

I appreciate your comments about the introduction. As I said before, producing a perfect introduction is impossible and there are so many good ways to say the same thing. As for the purpose of the introduction, the style manual at

436:, popular here in Germany over many years, wrote a paper about how to identify ring artefacts. One (out of many) sign is the fact that in ring artefacts you will always see perfect concentring rings. The paper can be seen here: 533:

Ekem: PRoblem. Someone has made another redirection for "Pms" / "pms", that leads to somewhere else, meaning you have to give it in with all capital letters to get to our PMS page. Could you fix this? I don't know how to do it.

3725:

changes would be necessary in the content of the lemma: The first sentence should be changed in "The Mahdian Crusade was a military expedition in 1390", and the heading "The siege" should be changed in "The siege of Mahdia" --

3460: 491:) Do you know this is a mainstream theory or just a China based theory and challenged in the same way as the dates in the Yuanmou Man have been? At the moment I am writing an article on Chinese prehistory on Dutch wikipedia ( 2921: 3473: 3272: 3135: 3546: 3973: 2949: 1276:

Unfortunately not, it's only a very distant relationship. I do have a photograph of the Chateau she was given and it would be quite legal to upload it to Knowledge, were it not embedded in a pdf file! --

1697:, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on medicine-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join (regardless of medical qualifications!). Here are some 854:{{cite web |url=http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/aprqtr/21cfr182.1180.htm |title=21 CFR 182.1180 |accessdate=2007-02-16 |date=April 1, 2003 |work=U.S. ] |publisher=U.S. ] |pages=462 }}</ref: --> 775:

about the quality of certain sources (religious, amateur and self-published sources) and issues of interpretation. If you have the time and the inclination, would you mind checking out the discussion on

174:, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my 4137:, both can help bring independent sourcing to the main section of the article (I don't believe that such reporting is all "criticism"), and that would certainly help broaden the article's authority. 2964:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 296: 1364:

It is Ludwigshafen am Rhein, and you are right it is on the left side. It is a significant distance from Schaffhausen, but see the bombs on Zurich were destined for Aschaffenburg (300 km).

264:

Please accept my sincerest apologies. I have no agenda other than the shared goal to improve the work, and do not know how I made a mess of it. I am glad to see that it has been corrected.

3521: 2956: 4140:

I intended for these comments to be helpful, not to be mere criticism. I've asked other editors at DYK to weigh in as well, and if they disagree with me, that's fine. All the best,

2778: 2724:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2611:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3156: 111: 2720:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2607:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3948: 3930: 2014: 1900:

I've rewritten this article almost single handedly with few other contributions since then. If you have time and feel like it, I'd appreciate a copy-edit and/or comments. --

3501:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

1774:

Thanks for your contribution to preoperative fasting. I don't suppose you'd have a source for your addition, do you? I've placed a fact tag next to the statement for now. —

1474:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

577:. Here the PMS page should have been. Do you think you could fix it - or tell me how to do it? It is enough that our PMS page has a link to the disambiguations page. Best 2994: 2842:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! (Specifically, it is not a five-fold expansion as required by DYK rules.) Regards, —

1529:, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the 4130: 2062: 443: 289: 2975:

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

2584: 2572: 957: 503: 1530: 1712: 3065:

could you contact me via e-mail (steven_fruitsmaak AT___ hotmailcom)? I have a private message for you (I'm leaving on holiday, so ignore the vacation response).

794:

Oh thank you for taking time to help out! As you can see, I tried to fix the RR section (before it read that all the RRs were significant if they were 1.5 - : -->

1464:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 742:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 2513:

I've redone the infobox, lead and first sections. Looks like you got a bit confused by various (mis)spellings. Redirects created as appropriate to the article.

1261:

May I ask what drew you to create an article on this fascinating individual? She is my distant cousin, I was wondering whether you had a connection to her. --

478: 3730: 2097: 1564: 1543: 1524: 1355: 370: 3936: 3769: 2713:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2600:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2185:

at present. Your input, especially in the area of indications for tocolysis and preventative procedures (e.g. cervical cerclage), would be much appreciated.

1706: 3781:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

3590:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

3136: 2709:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2596:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1146:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's 3755: 3342: 3171:

Hi Ekem/Archive-101! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see

2770: 2754: 2747: 2697: 2685: 1100: 1085: 1066: 1051: 1035: 1020: 3110: 1952: 1932: 2628: 2137: 1998:. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see 1190:

to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add

3830: 1174:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the 4134: 3309: 1759: 1540: 303: 2968:

is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Knowledge policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

1616: 1106: 1072: 3365: 985: 2741: 1358: 4117:

I left a response on the DYK page. I had another look at the article, which is looking better every time. I also searched around a bit more. The

3639: 3578: 2317: 2002:(you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box (or see 2364: 1887: 853:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists caffeine as a "Multiple Purpose Generally Recognized as Safe Food Substance".<ref name=GRAS": -->

781: 581: 567: 558: 538: 513: 43:

I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Knowledge? Don't fret!

3564: 1006: 449: 355:

anachronistic: Wolff died in 1794, when wigs were still in fashion. The picture looks as if it was taken in the beginning of the 19th century.

3734: 2729: 2616: 1598: 1286: 1245: 913: 884: 339: 329: 314: 1368: 3651: 3559: 3402: 2159: 952:, as disambiguation pages are only meant for disambiguation, one should not wikilink additional words in an entry unless the main term is a 800: 498: 4087: 1672: 3247: 3026: 2893: 4059: 3715: 3439: 1694: 1648: 1576: 4203: 3749: 3360: 2548: 2522: 2500: 2481: 4155:

Do you mind if I run over the article again today to edit (incl. first names, little things like that) the citation templates? Thanks,

3986: 3705: 3691: 3221: 2999: 2965: 2377: 2256: 1414: 1341: 281: 268: 4164: 4014: 3526: 2210: 2051: 1457:

for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

758: 671: 640: 444:

http://www.medcyclopaedia.com/library/topics/volume_i/r/ring_artefact/gring_artefact_fig1.aspx?s=ring%20artefact&scope=&mode=1

408:

The effect on the brain can be demonstrated by MRI where a specific focal alteration (Hamer's focus, or “Hamerscher Herd”) is apparent

4065: 3991: 3347: 2976: 1911: 1487: 359: 96:

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some

4105: 2241: 608: 548: 527: 3366: 3130: 1310: 993: 986: 3814: 3794: 3623: 3603: 2293: 1812:. At your leisure, it would be great if you could pop by to check it out. I'd love to have your input -- since you seem to be a 248: 3953: 3304: 2969: 2960:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge may not meet the criteria required by 2860: 2811: 258: 3925: 1872: 3810: 3790: 3619: 3599: 2721: 2608: 2038: 1999: 1793: 1551: 1179: 777: 75: 3184: 2798: 2118: 752:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.

4188: 4149: 3189: 3116: 1716: 1401:

Can you rename the conclusion section? I think "End of the siege" will be better title than "Conclusion". What do you think?

3677: 3455: 3235:

of the maritime musuem. They are freely licensed you just have to upload them with the Creative Commons Attribution License.

203:

Well, thanks. I have a clinical interest. It is fascinating to see how the project grows and gets better. A lot of fun, too.

4126: 3420: 2972:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 2170:

Hi Ekem, hope you're okay. Sorry for my previous cheekiness when I suggested editors approach you with questions about the

1667: 442:

the CT brain scan shows exactly these concentric ring artefacts. Another page telling us about ring artefacts is this one:

3971: