1396:
Germaine Greer called it "prescient" and the New Yorker recently had a 5 page article with tons of praises and citations, using this language, way too much to enumerate here. It is also REGULARLY remarked that this book was written when
Firestone was only 26, which is extremely out of the ordinary in terms of landmarks and bestsellers. Do a statistical analsis of bestsellers under age 26 and youll find almost that this is quite notable and is thus a notable point for this entry. the reason her age is often referenced in regard to the prescience of the book, because it is so unusual, and that is why I stated this. The notability of her age is not a subjective acknowledgement from me, but stems directly from a 2013 NYer article. You may edit, but you cannot argue that her age at the time of this publication is not notable when countless critically acclaimed authors have argued that it is notable. You will instead delete every word I suggest in some cyber battle that is a euphemism for your self-loathing. It would have been completely appropriate for you to move those statements to "Critiques of the book" or "Praise of the book" and/or ask me for additional sources. Or do some work and find some yourself.
1268:
completely uncertain why anyone would revert a book's synopsis that includes quotes from the book and citations. I have reported you for edit warring since you will not adjust the synopsis based on your reading of the text, but will only remove it in favor of a single criticism you found from a rather obscure text. It is inappropriate to launch into a criticism of a book, when you have not yet written a single idea behind the book. The criticism can carry no weight unless you have mentioned
Firestone;s views on Freud. You also do not have to agree with her views on Freud to mention her views! Read the article that has been in construction for years on "Being and Nothingness," which talks about each chapter of the book, in the occasional terminology of the author, using quotations and references. This is the spirit of most books on Knowledge, and what you have written is not at all in this spirit. You have done this to other articles on Knowledge pertaining to homosexuality, feminism, gender identity, etc. Thus this appears to be associated with vandalism rather than a true objective spirit.
2709:
Foucault you would take as your starting point language processing for example, and how is it constructed within the human brain?None of this appears to be considered within the remit of criticism of
Foucault which is Foucault very same project albeit through the lense of history.I myself have issues with Foucault,but however,his critics take the historical narrative as their starting point.A big error of judgement because Norbert Elias himself acknowledges this himself.What I am trying to convey is this:If humans(the whole species) are the cultural animal that we have been told to believe in (you know the one for example that racism was an ornate feature of human nature for example) there simply would be no need to investigate any further human culture to any extent.One compelling example is the kings two bodies (
1756:
they will simply use the "rope" given to be sanctioned and blocked...but you also must take responsibility for your own actions and right now a neutral editor would surely see that two wrongs don't make a right. Just have some patience and try to understand where they are coming from. It isn't always easy to remember when we were new. I see that you have been with
Knowledge since 2/12/2009 and have a clean block log. Perhaps you simply do not know where they are coming from and the frustration of a block that you do not feel is justified. In some ways that is a shame, but in the most important ways that is great and I applaud you for that. But try to see both sides and see if there is a way to rescue the editor that may be worth the attempt.--
3990:, and what we're buying with that cost is maintaining or increasing article quality. The set of books that meet our notability guidelines is huge, but still small enough that the community is willing to tolerate low-quality articles in hopes that they will be improved sooner rather than later. If you expand the pool of potential articles to any published book, we're going to be inundated with low-quality articles, most of which won't ever be improved (not the least because, in the absence of reliable sources, we have nothing to say about them other than the fact that they exist).
5391:. In both cases, although I did not know I was dealing with the same person, I found you to be helpful, especially in terms of adding images to articles. I may not be in the majority here (and I am fine with that), but I found your presence to be an overall benefit to Knowledge. It would be a loss to the encyclopedia to not have you around; in fact, I felt this way ever since Polisher of Cobwebs stopped editing two years ago, and was dismayed to find out today that all this time you were editing under a different name which has now been blocked. I hope that when your block on
2339:
without merit. Three people acting in concert can be described as a trio as can two be described as a duo. Two people who sing together is the most common example. I think three members of a group acting together for a common purpose constitutes a trio, as does three individuals who share common characteristics like a trio of jugglers. Descriptions of a trio of burglars or con men are not uncommon. This manner of description is often used for a group that organizes it's activities beyond a single event. Not a big thing just a note. Best wishes. - -
553:
not simply a change in behavior but a change in physical response. This is the most contentious aspect of the article, and it concerns living persons. I'm not going to revert but will wait for other editors to weigh in, and unlike my change regarding eugenics above (which nobody seems to care about), I think there will be comments on this change. For myself, although I am not one of those personally involved, I think the deleted parenthetical passage clarifies the nature of the change and therefore should be reverted.
1334:
biased toward criticism versus discussing the entry at hand. Criticisms on
Knowledge, and all venues, almost always appear summarized after a synopsis of the book. Otherwise, nobody can understand the criticism. You launch into why Firestone was wrong about Freud with no mention of Firestone's own views on Freud. This is simply an absurdity, and cannot be argued. If you can improve the synopsis you should do so. You are not allowed to delete unbiased contents bc it is not in the spirit of Knowledge.
4866:. It is required that you be given notice in these cases so that you can respond, either to provide license, to explain why the content is not a copyright violation, or to rewrite the content, if you prefer. Unfortunately the contributor who flagged the issue is new and did not give you the notice. Accordingly, I am providing it below and resetting the clock for a minimum of seven days. If you have any questions about the process or the concerns, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. --
1388:
wonder at
University College London? And then you revert 5 paragraphs of synopsis that I wrote while flipping through the book over the course of 3 hours, because of one sentence you find biased, which you could have removed and I would not have even noticed.. That would have been within the realm of appropriate behavior, but your reversal indicates that you actually have a problem with people understanding the thrust of this book. Even your commentary after removal is disturbing and aggressive.
5321:
3060:
4510:
789:
5589:
31:
1312:
there is something seriously wrong with insisting on filling the article with praise of
Firestone and irrelevant commentary on contemporary sexual politics. If you would stop doing that, then maybe the synopsis could be improved. If you have reported me for edit warring, as you claim, then that is hypocritical behavior, and will be viewed as such. Finally, I'm not interested in vague, unsubstantiated complaints about my editing at unrelated articles, and see no need to respond to them.
637:
4758:
5243:
5187:
3923:
1392:
about the actual title of the book and its relationship to dialectic materialism and Marx and
Engeles? Not a peep from you. What about sexual oppression as the source of racial oppression? What is the title of chapter 7 and can you reflect on it? You prefer to delete rather than to learn. I have no problem with you including the critique of the one hit wonder if it was not a clear bias by exclusion/deletion of all other critiques/praises/opinions.
92:
2713:).Why,then was legal legislation need to make happen a political theology(in the middle ages) for the hierarchical order?It obvious that none of us are fools,how can one man fool a whole group people is beyond me the material concerning Norbert Elias deserves some consideration(did you know that Foucault spoke and read German fluently?And was on friendly terms with Norbert Elias?).Please consider this in the future
4683:
2479:: while it's true that "tatements about someone's sexual orientation aren't acceptable without a source", it's not quite true that "there's no choice but to remove "; the alternative is to identify sources and add citations. I'm ridiculously busy today (all week, in fact), but it took me less than 60 seconds to confirm that claims were verifiable and another five minutes to add the citations. Ideally,
3565:
2898:
2836:
2496:
730:
573:
134:
2753:
5534:
3369:
in the article. As to your other points, I wasn't aware that there is some ban on using online news articles as sources, and there definitely isn't a ban on using words such as "radical" and "controversial" - which would be ridiculous. Do by all means fix broken links if you can. I'll say more on the article's talk page, which is where this discussion should really be.
3161:(Furthermore, I don't believe I am guilty of "edit warring on various articles over a long period". Perhaps that is simply a default part of the template you placed on my talk page? If there are other articles at which I'm guilty of "edit warring...over a long period, would you like to say what they are? It might help me take a different approach if that's true.)
815:
provided. This settles the neutral point of view issue. It is clearly verifiable because it is a quotation from the man himself. And third, it is not original research in the sense relevant here, e.g. someone doing research on Finnis' views and reporting it here. I suspect that your reason has more to do with covering up Finnis' views about homosexuality.
4080:. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of
280:
Nearly all of what I've removed is trivial. All that is clear in my explanation on the talk page. If someone wishes to re-add something or edit my edits, it should be done (in the same way that I've made edits) with an explanation on the talk page. There's a lot more to be done on that page. Even after those initial edits, it reads like hagiography.
5262:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
5206:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1741:. It remains to be seen whether she will have anything meaningful to say to my response. I doubt it. It seems more likely, based on her past behavior, that she will go on complaining that everything she doesn't like is "POV", and refuse to modify her position. It's irritating, especially given that her complaints are often demonstrably wrong.
1842:
But my whole point here is that no one is in the clear right and for either editor to refuse to budge from their position is simply not helpful and I have to doubt that is what you want. I think you feel there may be underlying issues with the other editor, but we have to keep an open mind and not shut each other out. That's all.--
5162:
to ask editors experienced in copyright issues to review and address any other issues that may be found. You can help with this by identifying content that you know you have copied or closely paraphrased from your sources to facilitate that cleanup. You can also assist in rewriting in your own words,
4291:
What a juvenile and foolish comment. You don't "get" consensus from any individual editor, as anyone familiar with
Knowledge should know. Consensus emerges from discussion among multiple editors. That you wrote much of the article does not mean that you get to insert whatever material you like and no
4153:
I do not believe that my edits to the Crews article are anything other than neutral. They certainly are not intended to reflect either positively or negatively on Freud; I've no interest in engaging in such controversies. There is no further point to discussion on my talk page, as I cannot respond to
4004:
There's one more reason the "does no harm" argument is annoying. In the time it's taken for us to have this colloquy, you could have gone out and found a few of the reviews that I found. "Does no harm" absolves you from having to improve the article. If you want to !vote to keep an article, you'll
2536:
it's enforced. I do get worried when I see easily sourced, non-debatable content get removed per that policy, and I had hoped merely to suggest to you for future reference that there is another way to go about dealin with it. I'm truly sorry if my response came across as over the top. Coincidentally,
1981:
You've misunderstood me. I don't care one way or the other about the content of the text you removed: it's simply that properly sourced material shouldn't be removed without good reason and usually not without discussion and agreement on the talk page. A discussion that happened two years ago doesn't
1841:
Well now we seem to have common ground. LOL! As that is exactly what they say about your edits. :-) I don't think anyone has to allow such to happen, but perhaps there is that in between...we call it consensus. The other editor was new and given the chance to discuss now, they may feel more inclined.
1812:
Hey...you asked and I answered. And it is an important issue in the future once it is found that you have edit warred and another took the block over it, so...take it however you want it. But continue along these lines and you will probably not have such a clean block log. Just saying. You do realize
1755:
That isn't working together and I suspect you understand that. But as I have said before elsewhere...all those roads that lead to Rome are two ways streets. Try to assume good faith and understand that new editors need assistance not disapproval for their wrongful actions. Perhaps you are correct and
1693:
Now...having said that. Perhaps you should also be warned not to edit war as well. Seriously. The other editor is correct that you also edit warred... but they went further than you. Please attempt to work with that editor as they are clearly showing that they have an interest in the subjects you are
1395:
The context of my "biased sentence" has been upheld by many references that were praises of the book: "A sharp and often brilliant mind is at work here" NY times. From NAomi Wolf, famous and best selling author, "No one can understand how feminism has evolved without reading this landmark", I believe
1145:
Summarizing the book of a great sociologist also requires one to use her unique language, to define terms the way she defined them, etc. Hers is the language of revolution and any synopsis of the book should refer to this language. Thus I am not sure what "language in the POV of the book" could mean,
552:
FreeKnowledge, what might seem a minor change to you might not seem minor to other editors in this very sensitive section. For example, the parenthetical passage you have removed("he was no longer impelled towards men") might seem redundant, but emphasizes the fact that the change being described was
241:
I've only edited up to "Religious
Criticism." I agree that that phrase on notoriety should come out. You've been reverting to an unorganized and fragmented copy with extraneous and out of place material in each paragraph. If you'd like to keep that material, move it to its appropriate section or make
5454:
Yeah, I can understand that. There's nothing to hide, but I got the feeling that you stopped contributing to D&D articles as PoC because of the attitudes of some of the editors who were hanging around the articles you were working on. I can tell you that some of them are not bothering us anymore
4236:
Yes, JamesBWatson, I am aware of the policy on edit warring. I do remember that you blocked me. Your warning is noted. Unfortunately, the user I was having a dispute with, "Dr Lindsay B Yeates", is the sort who thinks that any edit they disagree with is automatically "vandalism", which tends to make
3489:
There's an excellent reason not to describe Kant as a "German-language" philosopher, which, put bluntly, is that it sounds stupid. That's simply not how philosophers are or should be described. Try looking at other articles about philosophers, and you'll see what I mean. Kant needs to be identified,
3368:
The reason you gave for removing that material from the lead was that it wasn't sourced. It's a common error for new editors to think that material isn't properly referenced simply because no citation is given immediately following the statements in question - the citations, as I said, are elsewhere
3130:
I'm not going to request an unblock, but I do have some comments. I can't help but notice that you have blocked me for a much shorter period of time than you blocked Beauvy. Although you are apparently trying to make out that we are equally guilty (correct me if I'm wrong about that), I think that's
2398:
Hey FKC. I've been keeping an eye on Beauvy's talk page and saw that you dropped another comment there. I know you're not trying to intentionally inflame the situation, but others may think you are. Would you mind stepping back from there for the remainder of the block? I still really think that she
2008:
Okies, the outcome of the talk page discussion was fairly conclusive: Nisbet's claim is a fringe claim and doesn't belong. I would add that it's overstated and vague, particularly when it links the guy to an ultra-controversial topic like Nazism. You haven't offered any new cites or any new material
1902:
The claim that Fichte was the originator of Nazism, or some key elements of it, has already been debunked in a fairly lengthy discussion on the talk page of the article, if you'd care to scroll up a little bit. It's a fringe opinion from Nisbet and, it seems, nobody else of weight. So it's up to you
1586:
I'm sorry, but there is nothing I can do at this time to improve the Szasz article in any major way. I've confined myself to removing a small amount of what seemed obviously inappropriate material. The article undoubtedly needs more work, but I would have to think carefully first about the right way
1333:
If something is "biased" you can change that something. But you cannot delete an entire synopsis. I have written no "praise of Firestone." You are imagining that a well-quoted summary is "praise" because indeed, you are biased. Anyone who posts a criticism as the primary entry of an Encyclopedia, is
1311:
is that article's talk page, not my personal talk page. In response to your comments, however, I can only say that while you may be making an effort to edit the article in an unbiased way, you aren't succeeding. There is nothing wrong with trying to improve the synopsis of Firestone's arguments, but
1208:
article to that article's talk page, especially considering that it is clear that FreeKnowledgeCreator currently does not welcome you at this one. Also, remember to sign your username at the end of the comments you make on Knowledge talk pages. All you have to do to sign your username is simply type
1104:
The material that you are reinserting into the Scruton article is excessivly detailed and grossly smacking of POV (in particualr the wording 'during a period when he had written about tobacco issues without declaring an interest'). The section needs to be trimmed down to be more appropriate in tone.
939:
No. That's just not acceptable. There already is a brief mention of Finnis's view of homosexuality in the section on his career, and that's quite sufficient. There is no need for an additional section on his view of homosexuality, least of all one consisting of a single, long quotation. If you think
428:
New Comment: Don't know what to think of this new edit on Bloom page which appeared in the religion subsection. It mentions his book Agon as making a passing reference but gives only an inadequate two word quote to make its case. It seems to have more to do with the other authors it mentions rather
5579:
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more
5095:
people: those whose homosexuality is accompanied by marked gender nonconformity from childhood through adulthood, those who are moderately cross-gendered in childhood but become more conventionally gendered at adolescence (the majority of both lesbians and gay men fall in this group), and those who
5084:
people: those whose homosexuality is accompanied by marked gender nonconformity from childhood through adulthood, those who are moderately cross-gendered in childhood but become more conventionally gendered at adolescence (the majority of both lesbians and gay men fall in this group), and those who
2708:
With regarding criticism of Foucault the main reason being that I have added the particular material is this (it was quite by accident that I found the material some months ago) it is quite evident that Hans-Ulrich Wehler hasn't read any of Foucault's lectures and if you wanted to be critical about
2026:
Now, if talk page discussions were essentially seen as having a sell-by date of let's say, one year after the discussion on a topic ended and then anyone can reinsert what was deemed unfit for the article again and there has to be a new full round of discussion...well, if that was it, WP would soon
1549:
Surely you cannot allow what is happening here. An article that previously was fair, balanced and accurate, has been totally ruined by an individual, who has little knowledge and obviously bears some kind of grudge, yet has been allowed to decimate an article. I do understand how difficult it is to
1367:
You claim to have written no praise of Firestone. Perhaps you don't remember writing this, then: "The fiercest opponents of women's rights have attempted to quell her exceptional aptitude for psychological analysis, assimilation of historical information, and plain foresight at the age of 26." That
1153:
It is an exhaustingly common technique for vandals to attention to criticism rather than summarize the entry at hand. Knowledge is not your blog. Your anti woman agenda is clear and I have seen it on your other pages as well. But you are not allowed to rewrite history. I have summarized the book in
523:
Don't patronize me. I am quite aware of the past history of that article. You have not given a single valid reason for reverting a single one of my changes to it, most of which are quite minor and uncontroversial, dealing (for example) with basic matters of grammar and punctuation. Your behavior is
279:
The material in the first section should introduce the person concisely, stating who he/she is and why he/she is notable. How many classes he teaches, if it is to be in the text at all, should be in the career section. That is typical of what has come out of the introduction and the other sections.
5439:
Normally I would have no problem with editors sending me e-mails. Under the circumstances, however, with my being blocked for using socks, e-mail communication is not really appropriate. It might be taken to imply that I have something to say to you, or you have something to say to me, that one or
4121:
I believe that the edit summaries I have given provide a sufficient explanation of the changes made. I'm not sure what the point would be of explaining myself on the article's talk page every time I make a minor copy-editing change. Were there any specific edits that you see as needing discussion?
3682:
was only briefly part of Germany (thanks to that Hitler chap) how can Husserl be fairly described as German? He obviously lived in German most of his life, and studied and wrote in German. But was he a German citizen? The article doesn't really tell us. Certainly, after leaving Prostějov, he lived
2338:
Greetings FreeKnowledgeCreator, I understand your contention that identifying the authors of a journal article on the HIV/AIDS denialism article as a trio may not be the best editorial form for an article that falls under WP Medical Articles policies however, the term and it's specific use are not
2207:
by accusing the editor of vandalism when it's really just a content disagreement. Rand is an American novelist in that she wrote her novels in America while an American citizen. However, she's also a Russian novelist, in that she's a novelist who comes from Russia. The editor you reverted is not a
1391:
Additionall,y throughout this discussion you have stated no substance and oyu have not made a single conceptual point or referenced anything from Firestone herself. Tell me what this book is actually about? You cannot even summarize her views on Freud, which are the thrust of the entire book. What
3270:
It's only the lead of the article as a whole that is supposed to summarize the article. The history section is already confused and cluttered, and I'm afraid your edit made it worse - which is why it was reverted. Feel free to open a thread about the history section on the article's talk page; it
3135:
since October 2013 would notice A) That Beauvy is more guilty of edit warring than I am, especially since multiple editors - not only me - have reverted her and B) that she is the one who has picked a fight with me, not vice versa. Stating that I am guilty of engaging in a "feud" with her doesn't
3009:
Whyever so? I would think that Knowledge would find any quality information that increases knowledge of the subject desirable, and at 15 pages, it's longer the some of the other citations. I think you might have researched the book and author before you took it out and I really do believe that it
1613:
This why Anotherpseudo has been deliberately vandalising the Thomas Szasz page, because Szasz founded CCHR with Scientology. This is part of a concerted effort by rationalwiki and other Anonymous anti-scientologists to defame Thomas Szasz. Can you allow this? Who can I contact to take this matter
1473:
I'm aware of the rules regarding 3RR. I'm aware that I can be blocked even if I don't violate 3RR. No need to remind me of that. I would love to discuss things with the other editor on the talk pages of the relevant articles. She is either unable or unwilling to engage in any discussion on talk -
1387:
you claim to be unbiased but your only entry is a non-notably sourced criticism of the book, not even properly quoted!! Interestingly, rather than find the vast number of notables who have commended reception of this book, you mange to find a single grammatically incorrect critique from a one hit
4736:
I've looked again at the talk page, and it seems that, despite the message you left above, you didn't actually remove any comment I made at Talk:HIV/AIDS denialism. Rather, it appears that you were trying to accuse me of vandalism because of some edit I made at a totally different page (which of
2483:
would have sourced them at the time, but we are talking about well-known facts about well-known people whose own articles do not lack for sources, so I don't think the situation was urgent enough to require reverting in the interim. I don't mean to be hypercritical, and if you disagree I have no
1958:
many of those who copied his program (especially in eastern and southern Europe) chose to define the nation through common blood, common descent. Many people reading an article relating to a key figure in nationalistic thinking today will take it for granted that nationalist ideas always posit a
1169:
Your comments above are juvenile and offensive. I am not guilty of vandalism. If you diaagree, then simply try reporting me for vandalism and see what happens. The content that you added to that article was poorly sourced and biased, written to promote Firestone's book (incidentally, I have read
1149:
In addition, I was not able to find your "quoted" reference - your adjectives appeared spurious and there is no evidence that that author stated them. Please provide the page number in your citation if she did. In general, your grammar was incorrect as well - one line contained 6 quotation marks
814:
I'm not sure what your problem is with the entry indicating that Finnis holds View X when the quotation provided is from Finnis himself indicating that he indeed does hold View X. It is not controversial to state that Finnis holds this view given that he is reporting it himself in the quotation
504:
This article has a long history of edit wars lasting for months, even years. It was not until high level Knowledge editors got involved to oversee every sentence of the rewrite that began in the summer of 2009 that the article became stable. Please do not make any changes to the article without
222:
You are the one who reverted back to a version with BLP-dubious content. For example, you restored the alleged names of Bloom's children, with no source, and the claim that one of Bloom's books was "notorious" and made him a celebrity, which also had no source. Please look more carefully at your
5395:
expires next month, that you will consider returning to editing. I think your honesty after being confronted is a sign of good faith on your part, and I believe the community will accept your return so long as you accept and abide by the considerations brought forth by the closer of your SPI.
4595:
RHaworth, I tried to upload a completely new version of the file - that didn't work. The upload interface told me that it was a duplicate of the existing file, and I couldn't upload it. Please look at the revision history of the file - I uploaded a new version of the existing file, just as you
1141:
I have included a synopsis of dialectic of sex that includes several DIRECT quotes from the book. The reason I did this is because first paragraph of a wikipedia page should not consist of a quoted criticism by some obscure, non-notable researcher somewhere in this world, when you have not yet
910:
The point of this entry, again, is to indicate a view Finnis holds which is front and centre and very prominent indeed in his perceived public persona. That is important. The page is not strictly about his legal philosophy. It is about his person, including his public persona. Best wishes,
1267:
FreeKnowledgeCreator I provided a synopsis of a book that you reverted into a criticism 5 times. I have even changed the synopsis 3 times after reverting, to be as readable and unbiased as I am capable of, and the entire community should work from there. All of my reverts included edits. I am
264:
You are entitled to your view that the version I have reverted to is poor, but it is the only version that is supported on the talk page. Please stop edit warring - I have had to request that the article be protected, because of your disruptive behavior. Try making changes slowly, and getting
4636:
What I tried to do first of all was to upload a completely new file, with a different name from the existing one. The upload interface wouldn't let me do that; it stated that the file was a duplicate of an existing file. I then subsequently uploaded a new version of the existing file, as you
4237:
discussion pointless. Judging from the editor's comments on the Freud talk page, it seems that they have now given up. Incidentally, if you are concerned about edit warring, you might just want to take a look at Richardlord50's behavior. See his comments below and the revision history of the
1953:
As for the point that Fichte didn't think of nationhood as continuing primarily through common blood, that's well established in research on him, I'll look around for some cites on the matter. And it should be in the article precisely because his model of nationalist thinking has been quite
1399:
Also if you look at my history, i have exactly 0 problems with anyone remarking on subjectivity, no history of reverting other people's edits, and no disturbing threats on my page like the one from you. Rather, your history is full of reversions of comments and subjectivity with regard to
2092:
There is already an established consensus on the talk page that the Fichte/Ă‘azis claim doesn't belong in the article - and since it ended there have been only a very few people bothering to post on that discussion page; like many WP talk pages it's slow and sometimes discussions drag on
4817:
Hi. I saw that you have written several articles on books by Sheila Jeffreys. Thank you, I'm glad you have. I'm not sure if you take requests or not, but if so would you mind creating an article on her new book "Gender Hurts"? Feel no pressure, of course. Thank you and have a nice day.
3473:
Actually, Immanuel Kant is known as German philosopher and not as Prussian. So either should be written in the lead that he was a German philosopher, or a German-language philosopher, or a Prussian German-language philosopher. There is no reason not to mention in the lead that he was a
3250:
Oh, come on, all the info in the section's lede are also found in it's subsections, but that's what the lede is for. Currently the lede only focuses on psychoanalysis as if it was the only player. If a lede should only mention non-duplicate information, rather than show a proportionate
1550:
keep an eye on such things and I appreciate the issues that you face. But honestly, AnotherPseudonym, (just look at his name to get a picture of who he is!), has vandalised this piece. If you allow this then the following pages will also have to be changed (amongst many many others.)
4154:
such vague, unspecific complaints (I have no idea what "POV" I'm being accused of promoting). If you still disagree with my edits at the Crews article, I suggest you start a discussion on the talk page, giving a detailed explanation of what if anything in my edits you disagree with.
2307:
I would rather my talk page not be used as a place to debate this. I have already made it clear I am not going to apologize. I'm happy to acknowledge that my judgment that the edit was vandalism could perhaps have been mistaken, but that isn't the same thing as an apology. Enough.
608:
which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks,
2976:
The answer is the better part of the chapter in the book called "Born to Grapple" (pages 223 to 238 specifically, 15 dedicated pages), deal entirely with Bloom's life as a literary critic, and his role as a champion of the Western canon of literature. Is that not sufficient?
583:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is
1120:
It would be best to discuss this on the article's talk page rather than here on my talk page. If you have serious concerns about the article, however, it would help to consult more widely and see what other editors have to say. Take it to the BLP noticeboard if necessary.
1568:
For example, Szasz was one of the first psychiatrists to challenge the idea of homosexuality being a mental illness (1970 - The Manufacture of Madness) and this article used to have a section on this which I contributed to. It has now disappeared. How has this happened?
5473:
Your block will be over in less than a week. :) If you have given any thought to my last message, let me know and I will steer you in the right direction! We could always use more help. If not, then happy editing in whichever corner of the 'pedia you choose to edit.
848:. We don't quote every single thing that someone says in an article about him - it's utterly inappropriate. There already is a discussion of Finnis's views of homosexuality in the section on his career; the additional section you keep adding is completely unnecessary.
3653:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
1038:
I have no idea. I'm not sure why it would matter either, since the term refers to Anscombe's position, not her gender. You may be right that "Don" is not correct, but replacing "philosophy don" with "philosopher" doesn't seem to be the correct way to remedy that.
175:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
396:
Update from yesterday and your good edit on Lead section in Bloom. The other editor has apparently moved the same POV issue to the Criticism section (as if you obviate your edit). Could you glance at the Criticism section for Harold Bloom regarding the NPOV?
3071:
temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, amounting to long-term feud with Beauvy, and edit warring on various articles over a long period, including recent reverts at The Dialectic of Sex. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1628:
24.253.64.178, making accusations, true or false, against other users isn't helpful. AnotherPseudonym may have added rather more criticism to the Szasz article than is appropriate, but his edits aren't "vandalism." The neutral point of view notice board
5037:
Given unaddressed copyright concerns, this article has now been deleted. Because of the substantiated copying concerns with the article, I am evaluating some of your contributions. I have so far in addition discovered copyright issues in the article
1154:
an unbiased manner so do not continue to vandalize this page that is finally shaping up. I will report vandalism immediately if I see any changes to the unbiased content that I have posted with 5 references. I can cite pages from the book if needed.
4875:
3589:
2922:
2860:
843:
If you had bothered to look at the article's talk page, then you would know perfectly well what my objections were to that material. Or do you not even know what a talk page is? You need to familiarize yourself with policies such as due weight: see
754:
3420:
By all means remove the Madonna reference if you like. It's a bit dated - celebrating Madonna was something Paglia did at the start of her career as a public figure in the 1990s, but she has taken a rather more critical view of Madonna recently.
3949:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
2057:
I don't think it should be so difficult to accept that you have to discuss this issue on the talk page: that's how things are supposed to work here, after all. If you can create agreement there to remove that text, then by all means remove it.
2264:
Rand identified very strongly as an American, and that's well-known. It should be easy to understand why identifying her as a Russian instead could be considered malicious. If you expect me to grovel to you or to the IP, the answer is no.
1079:
Yes, she was a philosopher, but "philosopher" is the wrong term to use in this context - it's not a position. If I were you, I'd raise this issue on the article's talk page, or maybe ask Tom Morris. He would probably be more use than me.
5459:), but currently only one still is around. All I wanted you to know is that if you ever did want to come back around to contribute to D&D articles again, I could help to coordinate with you to avoid confrontations with this editor.
1633:) is one place where you could discuss the Szasz article, though frankly my own experiences with it in the past haven't been very positive. You will have to use your own judgment here. Please consider that I don't control Knowledge.
1813:
more eyes (and ones with the block tool) are now upon the situation. I suggest following BRD, If there is no discussion and you revert a revert you may still be guilty of an edit war. One does not need to violate 3RR to edit war.--
322:
Yes, but you haven't convinced any other editors that you are right. Under such circumstances, you shouldn't be trying to change the article. It will simply lead to your edits being reverted. As I said, you may well be blocked.
3770:! The ru-wiki page calls him German and gives him a Category of "German philosopher". While the fr-wiki says he was "of Austrian and Prussian birth" but also categorises him as "German philosopher". Make of that what you will!
3875:
You made major changes, in my view clearly unconstructive, to the article without discussion. It was perfectly reasonable to revert you. You should have waited before anyone commented on talk before making such major changes.
1518:
I'm not sure how mediation is going to help when dealing with an editor who is so unfamiliar with Wiki-procedure that she can't/won't discuss on the talk page. (BTW, did you note that she accused you of being my sock-puppet?)
5111:
While I appreciate that you cited your source, Knowledge is not able to accept content in this way. All material on Knowledge must be available under free license, which means either we author it ourselves or we take it from
940:
that by saying "best wishes" to me you can end this discussion, or make further discussion unnecessary, you're quite mistaken. The position you've taken is outrageous, and of course I'll do what I can to reverse your edits.
3391:
Some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about living persons, must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned, regardless of the level of generality or the location of the
2375:
particularly in the context of an encyclopedia, except where that is the terminology employed to a purpose by a reliable source which I concede is exceedingly rare. I now have the Batman theme running in my head ;). - -
5198:
4721:
If you removed an ordinary talk page comment, which is what my most recent comment on that talk page was, then it is you, MrBill3, who are guilty of vandalism. Stop this crap immediately. I'm going to take this to ANI.
2687:
There is no consensus, and it's foolish of you to claim that there is. You've had nothing to say on the talk page except vague, windy, patronizing statements that don't deal with the specific issues facing the article.
5254:
4275:
Can you please tell me who do I go to see to get consensus from?Seeing as I am the one who wrote the who ARTICLE I have put a lot of hard work in and the article is written in good faith I am asking you to get off my
2399:
can be a productive editor once she learns the rules and I don't want to have her become more embedded in a combative position. I promise that I'll let you know if there is any discussion that you should respond to.
5179:
2223:
I said the edit looks like vandalism to me. That clearly indicates that this is a matter of my subjective judgment (which could be wrong, just as anyone's judgment could be wrong). I have nothing to apologize for.
5235:
3953:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1708:
Beauvy has started using talk pages, and that at least is progress. Unfortunately, little about her comments suggests that reasonable discussion is going to be possible. Most of what she has to say is just false.
3339:
Paglia has celebrated Madonna and taken radical libertarian positions on controversial social issues such as abortion, homosexuality, and drug use. She is a critic of American feminism and of post-structuralist
3585:
1368:
looks like praise of Firestone to me. It's because you have insisted on filling the article up with that kind of material that your edits have been reverted. Stop doing it, and then maybe progress can be made.
429:
than Bloom. When I looked up the contrib name, this came up: Aaronheller (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (38,824 bytes) (+637)‎ . . (→‎Religious criticism: some major ideas about Gnosicism and gnosis in Agon) (undo)
4987:
4962:
4930:
4001:-mandated em-dash is in the right place, and you do this before you put the article in to mainspace, then in my experience you'll be given quite a bit more leeway (especially in non-controversial areas).
3110:
A word of advice in case you choose to request an unblock. If, like many editors, you think that edit warring doesn't count as edit warring unless you break the "3 revert rule", then I suggest you read the
5149:
2425:
Beauvy has made a series of bizarre accusations against me, and I have felt obliged to respond to them. But if you think that my comments at her talk page aren't helping matters, I'll try to avoid it.
863:
With great respect, if you had bothered to read the citation, the quotation is not from someone reporting on Finnis' view, but rather Finnis describing his view, in a nutshell, himself. -Wadhamite55
1400:
homosexuality (just a coincidence that firestone was a LESBIAN??), sexuality, AIDS, etc. Remember your talks are entirely public so in scroling through Iwas astounded at the level of agendiz-ing.
5488:
Thank you again for the invitation, but at this point I have probably done most of the Dungeons & Dragons editing that I want to do. Any further edits to D&D articles are likely to be minor.
5022:
4997:
4971:
4934:
2672:, you should have accepted the first revert and entered into a discussion, leaving the article alone until you gained consensus. You did not do any such thing, and you are editing against consensus.
508:
As an editor myself who went through the laborious process of reviewing and gaining consensus on every sentence in the current article, I am glad to discuss any suggested changes on the Talk Page.
4215:, is that your edits are justified, but being "right" does not make edit warring acceptable. (If you are not clear about the edit warring policy, then I suggest you may like to have a look at it.)
2293:
Um no, Rich. Inserting debatable claims about a subject, or even (honestly) mistaken ones, into an article does s not constitute "vandalism", a term which has a very specific meaning on wikipedia.
2208:
vandal, they just have a different interpretation of which aspect of her nationality we should list. Even if they're wrong about this, you're wrong to call them a vandal and owe them an apology.
750:
294:
Please make any proposals to improve the article on its talk page. You would have a better chance of making changes if you would stop edit warring. Your behavior probably already merits a block.
5167:. Please check that page to see what articles are flagged; it will be annotated as the investigation proceeds. The CCI process is backlogged, so it may be some time before review is complete. --
4698:
or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Knowledge, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
5230:
5286:
5128:
take small amounts of content from copyrighted sources such as this book to supplement our articles, but this content must be clearly marked as a quotation and attributed and must conform to
3898:
Please resist the urge to "take it personal" prior to reading the encyclopedia's guidelines on article-writing. (I have reverted your edit to the lead, and explained why on the Talk page.)--
3115:, where you will see that that is not the case. Editors have been blocked for very slow long-term edit wars over a period of years, where they have never made more than one edit in a month.
4897:
2918:
5164:
1150:
inappropriately placed thus it was hard to reconcile what came from your head and what came from the author. In general, I suggest not posting anything about authors you have not read.
1023:
I do not know about the university usage of "don", but I do know that it comes from Spanish and in Spanish "don" is masculine. Do they really call women "dons" in British universities?
4923:
a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Knowledge, then you should do one of the following:
4468:
3233:
1403:
In summary, if a person includes a sentence you perceive to be biased resultsing from a total of 3 REFERENCES, out of a 5 paragraph synopsis, you should not revert the entire thing.
960:
Consider adding some of these new articles to the relevant categories on attempts to alter sexual orientation, rather than the more-general sexual orientation and psychology, etc.? –
3195:
2856:
2728:
The Elias issue is simply one of many controversies about, or disagreements over, Foucault's work. The article cannot possibly work every such issue into the criticism section: see
172:
157:
3744:
As Knowledge is an encyclopedia, it's better to follow what basic works of reference say, instead of trying to follow implications that could be found in more specialized sources.
567:
4464:
3213:
2514:
Thank you for adding sources for that material. I was perfectly within my rights to remove it, given that it was initially added without sources - your response is over the top.
2532:
Of course you were within your "rights"; your actions unquestionably were policy-compliant. My concern (which is a long-standing one) isn't that WP:BLP is enforced but with the
594:
188:
2599:
Just keep on insulting me. Go ahead. I would love to see you blocked. And if you don't understand where to post, or what ANI is for, then that's really your problem, not mine.
2027:
defeat itself, because there would be no way to keep up the quality of most entries of any importance. I think you're just writing your own interpretation of the rulebook here.
3691:. Later of course, he resigned from the Deutsche Academie in protest against the racial laws. What do you think? I've started a thread on the Talk Page. Thanks for your time.
4056:
Sorry I didn't reply sooner, Purefury182. I'm not going to do anything about article content right now, but I will take a look and see what I can do if the article is kept.
4615:
I hope you have noticed that you did the correct upload two minutes before you wrote the above message. Possibly a problem with the old image being cached at some stage. —
3807:
3666:
3140:
article finds her edits flawed for one reason or another (see Flyer22's comments, for instance). A "feud" is, by definition, something that takes place between two parties.
2129:
Exactly two posts on the Fichte talk page seem to have been added since summer 2011, while there have been a hundred edits to the main article in the same time. Conclusion?
337:
Hey -- in the meantime IP editor managed to remove over 7k characters that haven't been restored. I'm weary of the edit wars, but I wish they'd be more or less returned.
5091:
the existence of characteristic developmental patterns in the childhood histories of gay men and lesbians across widely different cultures. He distinguishes three kinds of
5080:
the existence of characteristic developmental patterns in the childhood histories of gay men and lesbians across widely different cultures. He distinguishes three kinds of
3779:
3753:
3715:
3170:
5489:
5441:
5412:
5392:
4798:
4748:
4723:
4662:
4646:
4601:
4409:
4374:
4341:
4305:
4297:
4257:
4242:
4155:
4123:
4057:
3967:
3877:
3745:
3707:
3491:
3422:
3370:
3272:
3162:
3146:
3028:
2995:
2741:
2733:
2689:
2645:
2608:
2600:
2515:
2426:
2355:
2309:
2266:
2225:
2176:
2168:
2138:
2102:
2067:
2059:
2036:
1991:
1983:
1968:
1931:
1923:
1828:
1799:
1771:
1742:
1710:
1680:
1642:
1634:
1623:
1596:
1588:
1520:
1475:
1408:
1369:
1313:
1244:
1175:
1122:
1081:
1040:
980:
941:
896:
849:
525:
452:
421:
413:
352:
332:
324:
317:
303:
295:
289:
274:
266:
251:
232:
224:
151:
117:
4250:
3885:
3803:
3523:
3499:
3154:
1089:
1066:
1048:
460:
4900:, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from
4349:
4065:
3960:
3456:
3430:
3407:
3378:
3302:
3280:
1851:
1836:
1822:
1807:
1793:
1779:
1765:
1750:
1732:
1718:
1703:
1688:
949:
904:
857:
533:
387:
4163:
4147:
4131:
3869:
2697:
2546:
2523:
2317:
2288:
2274:
2251:
2233:
718:
472:
360:
346:
4523:
4189:
2434:
1010:
988:
802:
402:
98:
5171:
4806:
4670:
4654:
4609:
4438:
4417:
4395:
4382:
3975:
3735:
3553:
3519:
2824:
1827:
I see. Well, in future I suppose I shall have to consider letting Beauvy add inappropriate material, lower the quality of articles, and in general wreck Knowledge.
5297:
4731:
3912:
3865:
3837:
3036:
3003:
2653:
2385:
2363:
1528:
1505:
1483:
1252:
1230:
1062:
1028:
666:
2590:
2563:) resuming the issues about Fichte, proto-Nazi ideas and your apparent notion that anything established by past editors for an article has a brief sell-by date.
2560:
1377:
1321:
1183:
145:
5018:
2622:
979:
I'll consider it, but I'm not sure which categories you have in mind, exactly. In the mean time, if you wish to re-categorize the articles, I have no objection.
4901:
4498:
1130:
1057:
Would you call her a chairman? It's a position, but it implies a gender. I would have assumed "don" ws the same. In any case, she was definitely a philosopher.
5511:
5497:
5483:
5468:
5449:
5434:
5420:
4908:. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our
3629:
2776:
2638:
1658:
4034:
3946:
3789:
1431:
x2! Not really sure what happened there, 'cos you are quite right, but it probably means that two other editors have got off scot-free elsewhere. Regards, --
2302:
1032:
3505:
1673:
4211:, which is in danger of becoming an edit war, could lead to being blocked. This is not a criticism of your editing: my impression, as I have explained at
585:
4951:
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org
3845:
3475:
2732:. If you wish to discuss this matter any further, please take it to the Foucault article's talk page. My talk page is not really the right place for it.
3264:
1903:
to find something substantially better. I realize you probably think German nationalist ideas of any sort equal Nazism in some sense, sorry, they don't.
1856:
Conversation on article talk pages is definitely more time-consuming. But that is often the place where new editors learn how to edit, Knowledge-style.
931:
883:
835:
4699:
4560:
4450:
4019:
2626:
919:
871:
823:
5132:. The material needs to be supplemental, not substantial - we can't take a summary of someone's book and make it the bulk of our article. This is not
4797:
Why ask me in particular? It's about a subject I've never even heard of before. What do you think of it, Goethean? I note that you haven't voted yet.
4737:
course was not vandalism), and somehow you got confused and accused me of vandalism on the HIV/AIDS denialism talk page instead. What stupid behavior.
4702:
which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
1867:
4819:
2616:
1288:
1200:, there will be consequences for that behavior. You need to familiarize yourself with the way Knowledge is supposed to work, starting by reading the
338:
2794:
2508:
1944:
of Nazism, you clearly want to keep it in. I repeat, you should take sme time to look at the discussion of it on the Fichte talk page two years ago.
688:
517:
4966:
4762:
4193:
2575:
1416:
3892:
3247:: "Reverted good faith edits by 135.0.167.2 (talk): Duplicates material already in the history section - Hooker and Bieber are discussed below."
2722:
5425:
Sounds good, and I can understand that - come back when the block expires or whenever you are ready. :) Would you mind if I sent you an e-mail?
4265:
2790:
1440:
684:
562:
5456:
4050:
3045:
3013:
2980:
2770:
4870:
3200:
Hey FreeKnowledgeCreator, In case you might be interested in a conversation going on about Paul vs: Jesus re Homosexuality, please check out:
1348:
1276:
1155:
622:
5440:
the other of us would want to keep hidden from the rest of the Knowledge community. To avoid such speculation, I have switched off e-mail.
4093:
3700:
2454:
4774:
2419:
412:
I'm not so sure that the edits that have been made there recently are necessarily harmful. I will be having a close look at them, though.
203:
Only reverting because of BLP-dubious content - including the (unsourced) names of his children and (unsourced) claims about his celebrity
4937:
and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name,
3577:
3124:
1458:. Discuss it on talk, take it to arbitration, but stop on the reverts. The state of the article can wait until it is resolved. Thank you
658:
5562:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
4230:
4114:
3483:
3362:
1580:
4687:
4571:
4533:
4516:
4509:
3190:
3105:
1798:
Really? And is this meant to be an absolute rule? Am I never to revert Beauvy's edits, no matter what edits she should happen to make?
1407:
I see no reason to reply to your nonsense here. Discuss on the article's talk page, if you have anything civilized or coherent to say.
994:
973:
782:
3398:
Statements akin to 'she celebrated Madonna' are trivial and if you really are going to include them just reference at the very least.
2217:
4944:
4630:
4589:
4478:
3935:
3907:
3817:
3722:
Yes, they are certainly reliable sources for this article. But then I see the Bibliography has such works as Robin Rollinger's, 2008
3533:
3447:
What do you think of my proposal on the talk page? I don't want to do all the work to reshuffle everything only to have it reverted.
2953:
2891:
2804:
2681:
1652:
1360:
1163:
1018:
698:
5411:
Appreciated BOZ, but for what it's worth, I'm not especially concerned by any of this. I can afford to take a break from Knowledge.
4285:
809:
5637:
5629:
5624:
4977:
3624:
3329:
All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source
2242:
It's a reasonable edit, even if it's wrong. It's not vandalism in any way. You are violating the rules with this false accusation.
1723:
Either work together or see this escalate...and I don't think that would end well for either. Remember...you did indeed edit war.--
580:
79:
71:
66:
5274:
5218:
3053:
3021:
2988:
1912:
391:
125:
5373:
3706:
If you look at standard works of reference on philosophy, they call Husserl German. We could do worse than follow their example.
3136:
seem fair when other editors (Ishdarian and Jim1138) have reverted her and virtually every other editor who has commented on the
406:
216:
4367:
4105:
I see that you are doing a lot of edits to this article. Would you care to explain on the talk page the thrust of your changes?
3290:
3201:
2476:
2472:
2468:
441:
4334:
3239:
5309:
4852:
4827:
4715:
4471:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
4320:
3810:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3526:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2797:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
2566:
I saw your notice at the Admins board, but I don't intend to reply there unless there are fresh personal issues of some kind.
691:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
5054:
4902:
http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-1295?rskey=l08Gp5&result=1
4538:
4474:
3813:
3529:
2800:
694:
488:
4551:
and the song Timothy Leary is clearly in the track list and the article has all the expected references. Isn't that enough?
5039:
3966:
Fascinating, but why are you telling me about this? I didn't create the article, and I made only a handful of edits to it.
3225:
383:
4791:
2348:
1114:
5361:
4185:
3654:
3093:
2582:
2567:
2459:
2130:
2094:
2028:
1960:
1922:
again, and please also refrain from making assumptions of any kind about what I do or don't think of German nationalism.
1904:
1615:
1572:
1467:
398:
309:
281:
243:
208:
176:
5405:
2668:
series of edits, you twice reverted against myself another editor to keep your version. This is edit-warring. Following
3861:
3646:
2665:
1058:
1024:
493:
433:
168:
5258:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
5202:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
5124:
to do so whether legally required or not. Quotation marks or block quotation are an acceptable method of doing so. We
3349:) information that does not use the correct tone. Words like 'radical' and 'controversial' should be removed from the
5011:
3490:
as I said, by nationality. If you wish to discuss this subject any further, please do so on the article's talk page.
3294:
3256:
2009:
that wasn't on the table when the discussion happened two years ago. So what has changed when it comes to that claim?
1201:
927:
879:
831:
501:
I am writing to tell you some background on the Aesthetic Realism entry and why I just reverted your recent changes.
5493:
5445:
5416:
4802:
4752:
4727:
4666:
4661:(Actually, I looked again and the problem seems to be gone. Maybe you were right and it was just a caching issue).
4650:
4605:
4456:
4413:
4378:
4345:
4301:
4261:
4246:
4159:
4127:
4061:
3971:
3881:
3850:
As you have reverted the two changes I made without responsing on the discussion page, I have to ask you, is this:
3749:
3711:
3495:
3426:
3374:
3323:
in demanding high quality sources - most of the references are from online news articles, some have broken links.
3276:
3166:
3150:
3131:
a good indication of where matters really stand. I think a fair-minded person who reviewed the revision history of
3032:
2999:
2737:
2693:
2649:
2604:
2519:
2430:
2359:
2313:
2270:
2229:
2172:
2167:"Consensus" that was last discussed two years ago is meaningless. I am not moved by or interested in your insults.
2063:
1987:
1927:
1832:
1803:
1775:
1746:
1714:
1684:
1638:
1592:
1524:
1493:
1479:
1422:
1412:
1373:
1317:
1248:
1179:
1126:
1085:
1044:
984:
945:
900:
853:
529:
456:
417:
356:
328:
299:
270:
228:
121:
2537:
that's pretty much the same way your three edits came across to me, so I guess we're even. Happy editing, anyway!
895:
what makes it inappropriate to include that quotation. As I said, we don't quote every single thing someone says.
4175:
3545:
2554:
2412:
1006:
969:
5000:
with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
4041:
and input your reason there? I would love to see logic and reason triumph here, even if it is not my own. Best,
4005:
be much better served by improving the article to the point where it's obvious that the article should be kept.
1217:. I signed your username for you above (though of course you added material after that time stamp, including as
5605:
5163:
with brief explicit quotations, any issues that are uncovered. You can find the specific investigation page at
4905:
4626:
4585:
4015:
3639:
616:
161:
47:
17:
5263:
5207:
5025:
saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
5120:
sources. In the case of such copying, we may be legally required to note direct copying and are required per
4600:
difference to the appearance of the article. The black line at the right side of the picture is still there.
4455:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
4340:
You are perfectly right, and I will do that in future where appropriate (actually, it is my usual practice).
4071:
4024:
3794:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3510:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
2781:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
2703:
1197:
671:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
599:
3588:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
3027:
Then put it back in if you insist. My preference would be to keep it out, but I'm tired of this discussion.
2994:
I think it would be preferable to restrict external links to resources whose relevance to Bloom is obvious.
2921:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
2859:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
2393:
1243:
Beauvy is free to comment here if he or she will stop making lurid accusations and be prepared to be civil.
753:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
4893:
3981:
1356:
1284:
742:
2354:"Trio" sounds like "duo", and if you say "duo", people think of Batman and Robin. It's language to avoid.
242:
a "trivia" section. I'll remove the children names and the notoriety remark in the next revision. Thanks.
5558:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
5345:
3795:
3077:
2200:
1204:
listed in the Welcome tag on your talk page. It is also best that you restrict your complaints about the
627:
3387:
Trying to condescend me instead of looking at the actual article seems like the wrong approach to take.
1737:
I've "worked together" with Beauvy in the sense that I have replied to her comments on the talk page of
1105:
My revert was an attempt to do this; I suggest working from this revert to improve the wording further.
5596:
4038:
3853:"Förster-Nietzsche was married to a prominent German nationalist and antisemite, Bernhard Förster, and
3650:
3635:
432:
Its a new account, with one single contrib, this one, on Bloom. Anecdotal, or subject for full delete?
38:
5328:
5007:
4913:
4857:
4011:
3939:
3662:
3511:
3067:
2766:
2747:
184:
5384:
4547:
article with the reason "uncited". I wonder what citation do I need to add. After all I linked the
4226:
3775:
3731:
3696:
3229:
1605:
Hi. Regarding Anotherpseudo. Looking on his talk page he is friends with David Gerard. Please see
1136:
476:
4912:. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be
4691:
4281:
4181:
4098:
2718:
2586:
2571:
2450:
2440:
2134:
2098:
2032:
1964:
1908:
1619:
1576:
1544:
955:
313:
285:
247:
212:
3245:
3204:. Any insights or comments you might have in such a discussion would be most welcome. Thanks,
5341:
5305:
4565:
3891:
3766:
I tend to agree. But I notice the de-wiki article gives him categories of German, Austrian and
3671:
3479:
3310:
3186:
3120:
3101:
3073:
723:
437:
3638:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of
2934:
between the "Aesthetic Mode" (feminine, intuitive, and artistic) and the "Technological Mode"
2484:
problem with that. I just get a little concerned when I see . . . how shall I put this? . . .
160:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of
5314:
5045:
5006:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow
4785:
4556:
4530:
4330:
4198:
4046:
4030:
3930:
3914:
3468:
3452:
3403:
3358:
3298:
3260:
2964:
2194:
1847:
1818:
1789:
1761:
1728:
1699:
1669:
923:
875:
827:
513:
484:
4645:
Does it look different from your computer? Is the black line at the right side still there?
3612:
3607:{{lang-de|Beitrage Zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis}}) is a work by German philosopher [[Martin
5142:
5133:
5121:
4909:
4823:
4543:
Hello, It seems that you reverted a sentence I wrote in the popular culture section of the
4143:
4110:
3658:
3620:
3346:
3221:
3209:
3176:
2958:
2949:
2910:
2887:
2829:
2762:
2677:
2659:
2542:
2504:
2298:
2284:
2247:
2213:
1738:
1538:
1344:
1308:
1272:
1205:
915:
867:
819:
795:
788:
778:
342:
180:
1940:
While you're not the first originator of the insertion Ăłf this claim, that Fichte was the
101:
has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the
8:
5571:
5168:
5146:
5096:
are conventionally gendered (except for their sexual orientation) throughout their lives.
5085:
are conventionally gendered (except for their sexual orientation) throughout their lives.
5028:
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Knowledge. Happy editing!
4867:
3771:
3727:
3692:
3549:
2940:
masculine, empirical, and aimed at the control of nature through the comprehension of its
2407:
1436:
1002:
965:
891:
The fact that it's Finnis himself saying it, not someone else reporting on his views, is
1146:
other than a synopsis of a terrific book that does not fit with your particular agenda.
5555:
5388:
4620:
4579:
4277:
4212:
3903:
3558:
2714:
2480:
2446:
114:
4956:
4876:
Official notice and instructions for Copyright problem: Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
5301:
5282:
5226:
5113:
5051:
4848:
4770:
4711:
4703:
4548:
4494:
4485:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4355:
4222:
4089:
3833:
3824:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3540:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3218:
Please check refernec number 13 and 14 on the James Martineau page Thanks from Mike
3182:
3116:
3097:
3049:
3017:
2984:
2820:
2811:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
2634:
2381:
2344:
1501:
1463:
1226:
714:
705:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
654:
558:
5017:
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at
382:
New Comment on Bloom. Could you look at the altered Lead section for Harold Bloom?
5351:
4832:
4676:
4552:
4503:
4326:
4270:
4042:
3724:
Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Language
3448:
3399:
3354:
3083:
2786:
2093:
inconclusively. Who am I supposed to wait for if I'd post there - you, perhaps? ;)
1843:
1814:
1785:
1757:
1724:
1695:
1665:
1660:. If they return and continue disruption and I do not notice it, you can let admin
1352:
1280:
1159:
509:
480:
4643:
to change the appearance of the article, so I don't see how the problem is solved.
5567:
5369:
4741:
4139:
4106:
4099:
3616:
3569:
3205:
2945:
2902:
2883:
2840:
2782:
2729:
2673:
2538:
2500:
2445:
Thank you! Looks like we have a little bit of an edit war, alas. Advice welcome.
2294:
2280:
2243:
2209:
1661:
1630:
1193:
1099:
774:
734:
672:
107:
template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
5604:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4203:
My guess is that an editor of your experience is aware of Knowledge's policy on
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
5378:
5337:
4742:
4695:
4391:(I ask because I can't find any non-rare editions of the title on WorldCat.) —
3672:
3611:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
3515:
3316:
2848:
2402:
1897:
1545:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Thomas_Szasz#Please_do_not_undo_factual_statements
1432:
1110:
998:
961:
589:
2872:
2008), ''In a Sheep's Eye, Darling'' (], 1988), and ''Stars Above, Stars Below
1218:
5544:
5507:
5479:
5464:
5430:
5401:
5159:
5129:
4840:
4812:
4788:
4616:
4575:
4544:
4435:
4392:
4364:
4311:
4293:
4208:
3998:
3956:
3899:
3799:
3320:
2669:
2489:
2204:
1919:
1451:
845:
680:
676:
611:
605:
193:
4765:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - -
1610:
5548:
5344:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
5320:
5278:
5259:
5222:
5203:
5117:
4863:
4844:
4766:
4707:
4490:
4486:
4204:
4085:
4081:
4077:
3829:
3825:
3541:
3112:
3076:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
3059:
2816:
2812:
2710:
2630:
2377:
2340:
2333:
1497:
1459:
1428:
1222:
710:
706:
650:
604:
Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the
554:
5527:
5180:
Orphaned non-free image File:Madness and Civilization (French edition).jpg
3679:
1770:
What specific form of "working together" with Beauvy would you recommend?
636:
5291:
5236:
Orphaned non-free image File:The History of Sexuality (first edition).jpg
4779:
1445:
466:
141:
4138:
It seems to me that you are imposing an undue POV in relation to Freud.
3271:
would be a more appropriate place to discuss matters than my talk page.
5365:
5047:
City of Friends: A Portrait of the Gay and Lesbian Community in America
3145:
I invite Ishdarian, Jim1138, and Flyer22 to comment on the situation.
2973:
You took it out asking, "What does this book have to do with Bloom?"
2968:
Every Book Its Reader: The Power of the Printed Word to Stir the World
2963:
Hi, You undid an edit to Harold Bloom's External Links that I did : *
2581:
Nobody's asked for your advice on where to post and how, college boy.
1174:, and I have absolutely no interest in debating its merits with you).
5559:
5551:
4929:
If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
3997:
aspects of an article, from polishing the prose to making sure every
1106:
351:
Please see the talk page. There are BLP concerns over that material.
5383:
Sorry to see that this happened to you. I first encountered you as
5158:
Further investigation has disclosed further issues; I have opened a
5042:. Content was copied with minimal alteration from the cited source:
1307:
As was already pointed out to you, the appropriate place to discuss
5540:
5503:
5475:
5460:
5426:
5397:
5165:
Knowledge:Contributor copyright investigations/FreeKnowledgeCreator
4984:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "
4833:
4238:
1857:
4843:
concerning scope of the article. This is a neutral notification.
3573:
2906:
2844:
2623:
Talk:HIV/AIDS denialism/Archive 13#That "trio" was the Perth Group
738:
579:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
4996:, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at
3855:
reworked Nietzsche's unpublished writings to fit her own ideology
3688:
2559:
Hello Creator, this is to let you know I made a post at the ANI (
475:
that you may be interested in given your recent contributions on
201:
I'm not sure what you're referring to here in the summary blurb:
205:. You're reverting back to a revision that has dubious content?
3684:
3581:
2914:
2852:
1606:
1142:
summarized the thrust of the book. This is what you have done.
746:
4682:
1210:
5533:
5106:
I have bolded to make it clear where duplication is precise.
4862:
Hello. An article you created was listed by another user at
4526:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
4256:(Actually, now that I look, I see you blocked him. Thanks).
1982:
show that there is consensus for removing the material now.
805:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
572:
3645:
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
3181:...for your message on my talk page. I have replied there.
2752:
1959:
blood bond, especially if there's a supposed link to Nazism
167:
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
4460:
3196:
An article discussion that might be of interest to you...
2878:'' (], 1984.) Milk and Tides was a finalist for a 2009 ]
1657:
The editor who was warring has been blocked for 31 hours
5298:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/FreeKnowledgeCreator
4896:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as
4363:
What's the ISBN of your copy of Intro to Metaphysics? —
3726:. The article categories used seem to be equally split!
2644:
Thanks, but I think I'm going to avoid that discussion.
2625:) has been brought to the Reliable sources Noticeboard (
1664:
know of the issues and they will look into it. Thanks.--
1563:
1553:
588:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
568:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
5502:
Glad to have whatever you can provide. See you around.
4515:
Hello, Freeknowledgecreator. You have new messages at
4459:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3928:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
3798:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3514:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3042:
I will put it back. Thanks for discussing it with me.
2785:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
2627:
WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#The Perth Group website
794:
Hello, Freeknowledgecreator. You have new messages at
675:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
5387:
back in 2011 or 2012, and recently encountered you as
5273:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
5217:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
4933:(CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at
4207:, in which case you will realise that your editing at
4037:
page. Could you by chance look at the bottom issue at
4035:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Signature in the Cell
3947:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Signature in the Cell
3601:'''''Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning)'''''
3584:
by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
2917:
by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
544:
Just letting you know I posted this on the Talk Page:
5010:. For more information on Knowledge's policies, see
4296:. It's simply too bad if you don't like the policy.
3934:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
2855:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just
749:by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just
152:
License tagging for File:Kuhn Black-Body Theory.jpg
5340:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
5199:File:Madness and Civilization (French edition).jpg
5255:File:The History of Sexuality (first edition).jpg
5061:. Looking at the first two sentence, for example:
4694:, did not appear to be constructive and has been
1558:
5348:by adding the following text below this notice:
3596:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
3080:by adding the following text below this notice:
2929:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
2867:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
761:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
667:Disambiguation link notification for September 9
5574:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
4988:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License
4963:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License
4931:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License
4763:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
4522:Message added 05:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC). You can
2970:, HarperCollins, New York, 2005, pp. 224--238.
997:and its subcats, if you do end up doing that. –
649:Just to let you know your work is appreciated.
5269:Note that any non-free images not used in any
5213:Note that any non-free images not used in any
3630:License tagging for File:Marx after Sraffa.jpg
2777:Disambiguation link notification for January 3
5296:I have opened an SPI case that concerns you:
3790:Disambiguation link notification for March 13
447:It has been some time since I last looked at
3506:Disambiguation link notification for March 6
2488:of the letter, as opposed to the spirit, of
308:The explanation is already on the talk page.
5145:and the associated links and guidelines. --
4906:violation of Knowledge's copyright policies
4322:, could you convert them to proper refs?
4319:Instead of deleting external links, as here
3846:Förster-Nietzsche and Nietzsches late works
3578:Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning)
451:, so I'm not sure I can be much help here.
265:agreement for them on the talk page first.
4572:File:Inner Experience (French edition).jpg
4517:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pet tattoo
4451:Disambiguation link notification for May 3
1784:Well...to start...don't revert a revert.--
1192:Beauvy, stop the personal attacks or, per
995:Category:Sexual orientation change efforts
4945:Knowledge:Requesting copyright permission
3986:According to my logic, every article has
3334:The particular material that I removed:
3255:and impression, then what is a lede for?
2617:Reliable sources Noticeboard notification
1611:http://rationalwiki.org/User:David_Gerard
4978:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
4184:. That's where the reference is from. --
3860:proven somewhere or just speculation? --
2621:A discussion you have participated in, (
581:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
505:first discussing them on the Talk Page.
3993:If you want to take responsibility for
14:
5602:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5554:! This greeting (and season) promotes
4686:Welcome to Knowledge. At least one of
1564:http://en.wikipedia.org/Antipsychiatry
1554:http://en.wikipedia.org/Medicalization
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5566:Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{
5043:
4292:one else can touch or remove it. See
3657:. Thank you for your cooperation. --
3572:. I have automatically detected that
2905:. I have automatically detected that
2843:. I have automatically detected that
737:. I have automatically detected that
179:. Thank you for your cooperation. --
5583:
5040:Male Homosexuality in Four Societies
4970:, and note that you have done so on
4084:. Thank you for your understanding.
2493:
99:request for help from administrators
86:
25:
5160:contributor copyright investigation
5023:Talk:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
5012:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
4998:Talk:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
4972:Talk:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
4935:Talk:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
4919:If you believe that the article is
4761:There is currently a discussion at
3936:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
3655:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
3319:I would like to ask you to respect
177:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
23:
5532:
5319:
5241:
5185:
4508:
4076:I have removed your submission at
3058:
2751:
787:
571:
24:
5651:
5580:generic "Season's Greetings". Â :)
5136:use of their copyrighted content.
4574:? Simply upload a new version. —
4570:Why on earth request deletion of
4218:The editor who uses the pseudonym
3945:The article will be discussed at
1653:Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why
1202:Knowledge:Policies and guidelines
1019:Philosophy don (Anscombe article)
5587:
4904:, and therefore to constitute a
4756:
4681:
4457:The Discovery of the Unconscious
4182:Meister_Eckart#Modern_philosophy
4029:I noticed your contributions to
3921:
3563:
2896:
2834:
2494:
1494:Knowledge:Requests for mediation
1427:Greetings FreeKnowledgeCreator.
728:
635:
132:
90:
29:
5360:. However, you should read the
4994:released into the public domain
4690:, such as the edit you made to
3642:to indicate this information.
3202:Jesus' silence on homosexuality
3092:. However, you should read the
2481:the editor who added the claims
1559:http://en.wikipedia.org/Disease
164:to indicate this information.
158:File:Kuhn Black-Body Theory.jpg
5044:LeVay, Simon (February 1997).
4967:GNU Free Documentation License
4939:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
4898:Jørgen Jørgensen (philosopher)
4784:What do you think of this one?
3683:the early part of his life in
3315:In response to your revert on
3240:Yes I added duplicate material
1011:15:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
989:04:59, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
974:04:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
950:22:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
932:21:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
905:21:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
884:21:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
858:21:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
836:21:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
810:Finnis' views on homosexuality
783:01:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
606:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
18:User talk:Freeknowledgecreator
13:
1:
5469:00:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
5450:07:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
5435:15:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
5421:07:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
5406:22:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
5374:05:59, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
5332:from editing for a period of
5310:14:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
5264:our policy for non-free media
5208:our policy for non-free media
5172:12:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
5150:11:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
4539:Timothy Leary change reverted
3500:17:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
3484:08:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
3457:14:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2654:04:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
2639:02:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
2609:23:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2591:23:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2576:22:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2547:06:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
2524:04:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
2509:21:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
2279:FKC. You are quite right. –
1164:02:25, 26 October 2013‎ (UTC)
719:11:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
461:22:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
442:19:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
5512:12:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
5498:06:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
5484:03:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
5287:00:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
5275:criteria for speedy deletion
5219:criteria for speedy deletion
4864:the copyright problems board
3474:German-language philosopher.
3431:20:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
3408:20:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
3379:19:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
3363:14:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
3303:08:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
3281:08:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
3265:06:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
3234:09:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
3214:22:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
3191:22:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
3171:22:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
3155:22:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
3125:21:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
3106:21:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
2954:02:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
2771:04:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
2742:18:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
2723:14:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
2698:21:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
2682:21:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
2486:overenthusiastic enforcement
2455:22:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
2435:21:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
2420:03:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
2386:01:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
2364:23:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
2349:09:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
2318:23:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2303:23:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2289:15:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2275:08:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2252:08:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2234:08:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2218:08:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
2177:04:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
2139:04:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
2103:04:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
2068:04:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
2037:04:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1992:03:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1969:03:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1932:03:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1913:02:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1868:00:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
1852:02:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1837:02:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1823:02:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1808:02:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1794:02:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1780:02:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1766:01:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1751:01:39, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1733:01:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1719:01:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1704:01:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
1689:06:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
1679:Thank you for notifying me.
1674:06:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
1643:22:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1624:21:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1607:http://rationalwiki.org/Xenu
1597:18:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1581:14:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1529:07:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1506:07:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1484:06:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1468:06:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1441:22:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
1417:06:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
1378:05:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
1361:04:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
1322:04:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
1289:04:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
1253:19:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
1231:16:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
1184:04:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
1131:06:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
1115:06:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
1090:21:47, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
1067:16:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
743:Erich Neumann (psychologist)
524:obstructionist and foolish.
7:
5231:18:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
4992:", or that the material is
4871:12:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
4755:) 22:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
4596:suggested, but it has made
3796:Phenomenology of Perception
3054:20:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
3037:19:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
3022:16:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
3004:03:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
2989:22:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
2892:19:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
2825:09:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2460:Sources and gay politicians
1049:21:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
1033:21:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
498:Dear FreeKnowledgeCreator,
422:02:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
407:21:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
392:13:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
10:
5656:
5050:. MIT Press. pp. 195–196.
4637:suggested, but as I said,
4360:Hi FreeKnowledgeCreator,
4350:21:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
4335:08:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
4306:22:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
4286:11:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
4266:23:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
4251:23:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
4231:09:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
4194:07:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
4164:00:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
4148:00:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
4132:05:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
4115:03:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
4094:13:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
4066:05:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
4051:15:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
4039:Talk:Signature in the Cell
4020:08:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
3908:10:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
3886:21:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
3870:21:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
3838:08:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
3780:23:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
3754:23:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
3736:22:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
3716:22:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
3701:22:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
3636:File:Marx after Sraffa.jpg
3613:these opt-out instructions
494:Entry on Aesthetic Realism
113:I need this page deleted:
5362:guide to appealing blocks
5342:make useful contributions
5242:
5186:
3976:07:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
3961:19:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
3667:20:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
3625:22:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
3554:09:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
3512:James Giles (philosopher)
3094:guide to appealing blocks
3074:make useful contributions
659:16:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
634:
623:13:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
595:18:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
563:15:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
534:20:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
518:16:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
489:23:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
361:23:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
347:20:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
5008:Knowledge article layout
4955:a postal message to the
4853:15:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
4828:18:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
4807:08:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
4792:03:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
4775:10:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
4732:20:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
4716:10:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
4671:23:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
4655:23:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
4639:that seems to have done
4631:11:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
4610:20:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
4590:10:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
3938:or whether it should be
3345:Much of this is trivial(
2759:Thanks for the welcome!
1474:perhaps you've noticed?
1423:Greetings and... apology
477:Talk:Quantifier variance
333:22:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
318:22:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
304:22:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
290:22:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
275:21:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
252:21:47, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
233:21:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
217:21:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
189:00:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
4990:(CC-BY-SA), version 3.0
4692:Talk:HIV/AIDS denialism
4561:17:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
4534:05:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
4499:08:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
4439:20:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
4418:20:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
4396:20:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
4383:20:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
4368:20:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
4176:Meister Eckhart/Derrida
3590:my operator's talk page
2923:my operator's talk page
2861:my operator's talk page
2555:Fichte reverts and such
755:my operator's talk page
471:An RfC has been posted
146:03:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
126:02:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
5537:
5324:
5247:
5191:
4513:
3063:
2756:
2492:we all know and love.
1198:WP:No personal attacks
796:Srich32977's talk page
792:
586:Talk:Aesthetic Realism
576:
5600:of past discussions.
5536:
5356:Your reason here ~~~~
5323:
5252:Thanks for uploading
5245:
5196:Thanks for uploading
5189:
4706:for that. Thank you.
4512:
4072:Third opinion decline
4025:Signature in the Cell
3931:Signature in the Cell
3915:Signature in the Cell
3634:Thanks for uploading
3088:Your reason here ~~~~
3062:
2965:Basbanes, Nicholas A.
2755:
2704:Criticism of Foucault
791:
643:The Original Barnstar
600:A minor change to DRN
575:
156:Thanks for uploading
42:of past discussions.
5490:FreeKnowledgeCreator
5442:FreeKnowledgeCreator
5413:FreeKnowledgeCreator
5393:FreeKnowledgeCreator
5143:Knowledge:Copy-paste
5122:Knowledge:Plagiarism
5078:Whitam has reported
4957:Wikimedia Foundation
4894:welcome to Knowledge
4799:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4749:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4724:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4663:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4647:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4602:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4487:opt-out instructions
4410:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4408:Well, now you know.
4375:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4342:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4298:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4258:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4243:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4156:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4124:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4058:FreeKnowledgeCreator
4012:Lesser Cartographies
3982:The harm of articles
3968:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3878:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3826:opt-out instructions
3746:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3708:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3640:image copyright tags
3580:may have broken the
3542:opt-out instructions
3492:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3423:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3371:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3273:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3163:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3147:FreeKnowledgeCreator
3138:The Dialectic of Sex
3133:The Dialectic of Sex
3029:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2996:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2913:may have broken the
2911:The Dialectic of Sex
2851:may have broken the
2813:opt-out instructions
2734:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2690:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2646:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2601:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2516:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2427:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2356:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2310:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2267:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2226:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2169:FreeKnowledgeCreator
2060:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1984:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1924:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1829:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1800:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1772:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1743:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1739:The Dialectic of Sex
1711:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1681:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1635:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1589:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1587:to go about things.
1521:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1476:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1409:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1370:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1314:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1309:The Dialectic of Sex
1245:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1206:The Dialectic of Sex
1176:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1172:The Dialectic of Sex
1123:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1082:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1041:FreeKnowledgeCreator
981:FreeKnowledgeCreator
942:FreeKnowledgeCreator
897:FreeKnowledgeCreator
850:FreeKnowledgeCreator
745:may have broken the
707:opt-out instructions
526:FreeKnowledgeCreator
453:FreeKnowledgeCreator
414:FreeKnowledgeCreator
353:FreeKnowledgeCreator
325:FreeKnowledgeCreator
296:FreeKnowledgeCreator
267:FreeKnowledgeCreator
225:FreeKnowledgeCreator
162:image copyright tags
118:FreeKnowledgeCreator
5572:User:Flaming/MC2008
5547:) is wishing you a
5455:(one shortly after
5385:Polisher of Cobwebs
5114:compatibly licensed
5019:this temporary page
4839:There is an RfC at
4469:fix with Dab solver
3808:fix with Dab solver
3524:fix with Dab solver
3113:edit warring policy
3010:should go back in.
2795:fix with Dab solver
689:fix with Dab solver
628:A barnstar for you!
5538:
5325:
5248:
5192:
5021:. Leave a note at
4959:permitting re-use
4524:remove this notice
4514:
4477:• Join us at the
4213:Talk:Sigmund Freud
4082:dispute resolution
3816:• Join us at the
3532:• Join us at the
3064:
2803:• Join us at the
2757:
2394:Beauvy's talk page
803:remove this notice
793:
697:• Join us at the
577:
5643:
5642:
5612:
5611:
5606:current talk page
5581:
5346:appeal this block
5260:claim of fair use
5204:claim of fair use
5103:
5102:
5056:978-0-262-62113-7
5033:
5032:
4980:for instructions.
4947:for instructions.
4941:, in your email.
4858:Copyright problem
4688:your recent edits
4482:
4220:
3821:
3537:
3224:comment added by
3078:appeal this block
2808:
2748:A kitten for you!
2466:
1363:
1347:comment added by
1339:
1292:
1275:comment added by
935:
918:comment added by
887:
870:comment added by
839:
822:comment added by
702:
664:
663:
473:on this Talk page
111:
110:
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5647:
5621:
5614:
5613:
5591:
5590:
5584:
5578:
5528:Merry Christmas!
5359:
5250:
5244:
5194:
5188:
5065:
5064:
5060:
4910:copyright policy
4885:Extended content
4881:
4880:
4760:
4759:
4685:
4527:
4472:
4465:check to confirm
4216:
3925:
3924:
3811:
3804:check to confirm
3606:
3567:
3566:
3527:
3520:check to confirm
3291:Continue reading
3236:
3091:
2939:
2900:
2899:
2877:
2838:
2837:
2798:
2791:check to confirm
2787:William Hamilton
2499:
2498:
2497:
2490:a certain policy
2465:(Polite cough.)
2464:
2415:
2410:
2405:
1865:
1614:further? Thanks
1492:Yep. Please use
1342:
1338:
1335:
1291:
1269:
1216:
1213:(~), like this:
1137:Dialectic of Sex
934:
912:
886:
864:
838:
816:
806:
732:
731:
692:
685:check to confirm
639:
632:
631:
621:
619:
614:
592:
140:
136:
135:
105:
94:
93:
87:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
5655:
5654:
5650:
5649:
5648:
5646:
5645:
5644:
5617:
5588:
5576:
5560:Merry Christmas
5530:
5381:
5376:
5349:
5317:
5294:
5239:
5238:
5183:
5182:
5089:Whitam reports
5057:
5034:
4886:
4878:
4860:
4837:
4815:
4782:
4757:
4746:
4679:
4568:
4541:
4528:
4521:
4506:
4479:DPL WikiProject
4453:
4373:0-300-01740-5.
4358:
4314:
4273:
4201:
4178:
4103:
4100:Frederick Crews
4074:
4027:
3984:
3926:
3922:
3919:
3896:
3848:
3818:DPL WikiProject
3792:
3676:
3659:ImageTaggingBot
3632:
3602:
3564:
3561:
3534:DPL WikiProject
3508:
3471:
3313:
3242:
3219:
3198:
3179:
3108:
3081:
2961:
2935:
2897:
2873:
2835:
2832:
2805:DPL WikiProject
2783:Alastair Hannay
2779:
2763:SarahTheEntwife
2750:
2706:
2662:
2619:
2557:
2495:
2462:
2443:
2441:Andrew Sullivan
2413:
2408:
2403:
2396:
2336:
2197:
1900:
1858:
1655:
1541:
1448:
1425:
1336:
1270:
1214:
1139:
1102:
1021:
958:
956:categorizing...
913:
865:
817:
812:
807:
800:
767:
729:
726:
699:DPL WikiProject
673:Sexual Personae
669:
630:
617:
612:
610:
602:
590:
570:
496:
469:
196:
181:ImageTaggingBot
154:
133:
131:
103:
91:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5653:
5641:
5640:
5635:
5632:
5627:
5622:
5610:
5609:
5592:
5563:
5531:
5529:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5523:
5522:
5521:
5520:
5519:
5518:
5517:
5516:
5515:
5514:
5471:
5380:
5377:
5326:You have been
5318:
5316:
5313:
5293:
5290:
5237:
5234:
5181:
5178:
5177:
5176:
5175:
5174:
5169:Moonriddengirl
5153:
5152:
5147:Moonriddengirl
5141:Please review
5138:
5137:
5134:transformative
5108:
5107:
5101:
5100:
5098:
5087:
5075:
5074:
5072:
5069:
5063:
5062:
5055:
5031:
5030:
5004:
5003:
5002:
5001:
4982:
4949:
4916:from editing.
4888:
4887:
4884:
4879:
4877:
4874:
4868:Moonriddengirl
4859:
4856:
4836:
4831:
4814:
4811:
4810:
4809:
4781:
4778:
4745:
4740:
4739:
4738:
4734:
4678:
4675:
4674:
4673:
4658:
4657:
4613:
4612:
4567:
4566:Image deletion
4564:
4540:
4537:
4520:
4507:
4505:
4502:
4452:
4449:
4448:
4447:
4446:
4445:
4444:
4443:
4442:
4441:
4425:
4424:
4423:
4422:
4421:
4420:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4398:
4386:
4385:
4357:
4354:
4353:
4352:
4313:
4310:
4309:
4308:
4272:
4269:
4254:
4253:
4200:
4197:
4177:
4174:
4173:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4166:
4102:
4097:
4073:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4026:
4023:
3983:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3920:
3918:
3913:Nomination of
3911:
3895:
3893:David Horowitz
3890:
3889:
3888:
3847:
3844:
3842:
3791:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3784:
3783:
3782:
3772:Martinevans123
3759:
3758:
3757:
3756:
3739:
3738:
3728:Martinevans123
3719:
3718:
3693:Martinevans123
3675:
3673:Edmund Husserl
3670:
3631:
3628:
3609:
3608:
3598:
3597:
3560:
3557:
3516:Disequilibrium
3507:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3470:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3433:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3382:
3381:
3343:
3342:
3332:
3331:
3317:Camille Paglia
3312:
3311:Camille Paglia
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3284:
3283:
3241:
3238:
3226:120.144.168.82
3197:
3194:
3178:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3158:
3157:
3142:
3141:
3065:You have been
3057:
3040:
3039:
3007:
3006:
2960:
2957:
2942:
2941:
2931:
2930:
2880:
2879:
2869:
2868:
2849:Margaret Hasse
2831:
2828:
2778:
2775:
2773:
2749:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2705:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2661:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2618:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2594:
2593:
2556:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2527:
2526:
2461:
2458:
2442:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2395:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2367:
2366:
2335:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2237:
2236:
2196:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1935:
1934:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1600:
1599:
1540:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1487:
1486:
1447:
1444:
1429:Sorry for that
1424:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1386:
1383:
1381:
1380:
1343:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1187:
1186:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1052:
1051:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
957:
954:
953:
952:
911:Wadhamite55.
908:
907:
861:
860:
811:
808:
799:
786:
771:
770:
763:
762:
725:
724:September 2013
722:
668:
665:
662:
661:
646:
645:
640:
629:
626:
601:
598:
569:
566:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
537:
536:
495:
492:
468:
465:
464:
463:
427:
425:
424:
384:76.193.171.245
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
257:
256:
255:
254:
236:
235:
195:
192:
153:
150:
149:
148:
109:
108:
104:{{admin help}}
95:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5652:
5639:
5636:
5633:
5631:
5628:
5626:
5623:
5620:
5616:
5615:
5607:
5603:
5599:
5598:
5593:
5586:
5585:
5582:
5575:
5573:
5569:
5564:
5561:
5557:
5553:
5550:
5546:
5542:
5535:
5513:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5500:
5499:
5495:
5491:
5487:
5486:
5485:
5481:
5477:
5472:
5470:
5466:
5462:
5458:
5453:
5452:
5451:
5447:
5443:
5438:
5437:
5436:
5432:
5428:
5424:
5423:
5422:
5418:
5414:
5410:
5409:
5408:
5407:
5403:
5399:
5394:
5390:
5389:ImprovingWiki
5386:
5375:
5371:
5367:
5363:
5357:
5353:
5347:
5343:
5339:
5338:sock puppetry
5335:
5331:
5330:
5322:
5315:December 2014
5312:
5311:
5307:
5303:
5299:
5289:
5288:
5284:
5280:
5277:. Thank you.
5276:
5272:
5267:
5265:
5261:
5257:
5256:
5249:
5233:
5232:
5228:
5224:
5221:. Thank you.
5220:
5216:
5211:
5209:
5205:
5201:
5200:
5193:
5173:
5170:
5166:
5161:
5157:
5156:
5155:
5154:
5151:
5148:
5144:
5140:
5139:
5135:
5131:
5127:
5123:
5119:
5118:public domain
5115:
5110:
5109:
5105:
5104:
5099:
5097:
5092:
5088:
5086:
5081:
5077:
5076:
5073:
5070:
5067:
5066:
5058:
5053:
5049:
5048:
5041:
5036:
5035:
5029:
5026:
5024:
5020:
5015:
5013:
5009:
4999:
4995:
4991:
4989:
4983:
4981:
4979:
4973:
4969:
4968:
4964:
4958:
4954:
4950:
4948:
4946:
4940:
4936:
4932:
4928:
4927:
4926:
4925:
4924:
4922:
4917:
4915:
4911:
4907:
4903:
4899:
4895:
4890:
4889:
4883:
4882:
4873:
4872:
4869:
4865:
4855:
4854:
4850:
4846:
4842:
4841:Talk:Georgism
4835:
4830:
4829:
4825:
4821:
4808:
4804:
4800:
4796:
4795:
4794:
4793:
4790:
4786:
4777:
4776:
4772:
4768:
4764:
4754:
4750:
4744:
4735:
4733:
4729:
4725:
4720:
4719:
4718:
4717:
4713:
4709:
4705:
4701:
4697:
4693:
4689:
4684:
4672:
4668:
4664:
4660:
4659:
4656:
4652:
4648:
4644:
4642:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4628:
4625:
4622:
4618:
4611:
4607:
4603:
4599:
4594:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4587:
4584:
4581:
4577:
4573:
4563:
4562:
4558:
4554:
4550:
4549:album article
4546:
4545:Timothy Leary
4536:
4535:
4532:
4525:
4518:
4511:
4501:
4500:
4496:
4492:
4488:
4483:
4480:
4476:
4470:
4466:
4462:
4458:
4440:
4437:
4433:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4429:
4428:
4427:
4426:
4419:
4415:
4411:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4397:
4394:
4390:
4389:
4388:
4387:
4384:
4380:
4376:
4372:
4371:
4370:
4369:
4366:
4361:
4351:
4347:
4343:
4339:
4338:
4337:
4336:
4332:
4328:
4323:
4321:
4317:
4307:
4303:
4299:
4295:
4290:
4289:
4288:
4287:
4283:
4279:
4278:Richardlord50
4268:
4267:
4263:
4259:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4240:
4235:
4234:
4233:
4232:
4228:
4224:
4219:
4214:
4210:
4209:Sigmund Freud
4206:
4199:Sigmund Freud
4196:
4195:
4191:
4187:
4186:94.220.213.27
4183:
4165:
4161:
4157:
4152:
4151:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4129:
4125:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4116:
4112:
4108:
4101:
4096:
4095:
4091:
4087:
4083:
4079:
4067:
4063:
4059:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4052:
4048:
4044:
4040:
4036:
4032:
4022:
4021:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4006:
4002:
4000:
3996:
3991:
3989:
3977:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3959:
3958:
3951:
3948:
3943:
3941:
3937:
3933:
3932:
3916:
3910:
3909:
3905:
3901:
3894:
3887:
3883:
3879:
3874:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3867:
3863:
3858:
3856:
3851:
3843:
3840:
3839:
3835:
3831:
3827:
3822:
3819:
3815:
3809:
3805:
3801:
3800:Phenomenology
3797:
3781:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3762:
3761:
3760:
3755:
3751:
3747:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3737:
3733:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3720:
3717:
3713:
3709:
3705:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3698:
3694:
3690:
3686:
3681:
3674:
3669:
3668:
3664:
3660:
3656:
3652:
3648:
3643:
3641:
3637:
3627:
3626:
3622:
3618:
3614:
3605:
3600:
3599:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3591:
3587:
3586:edit the page
3583:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3556:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3538:
3535:
3531:
3525:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3481:
3477:
3469:Immanuel Kant
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3419:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3393:
3389:
3388:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3380:
3376:
3372:
3367:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3360:
3356:
3352:
3348:
3347:WP:MISCELLANY
3341:
3337:
3336:
3335:
3330:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3322:
3318:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3248:
3246:
3237:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3216:
3215:
3211:
3207:
3203:
3193:
3192:
3188:
3184:
3172:
3168:
3164:
3160:
3159:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3143:
3139:
3134:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3089:
3085:
3079:
3075:
3070:
3069:
3061:
3056:
3055:
3051:
3047:
3043:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2966:
2956:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2938:
2933:
2932:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2924:
2920:
2919:edit the page
2916:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2894:
2893:
2889:
2885:
2876:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2862:
2858:
2857:edit the page
2854:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2809:
2806:
2802:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2774:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2760:
2754:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2715:Richardlord50
2712:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2667:
2655:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2583:83.254.151.33
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2568:83.254.151.33
2564:
2562:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2491:
2487:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2457:
2456:
2452:
2448:
2447:MarkBernstein
2436:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2215:
2211:
2206:
2202:
2195:Not vandalism
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2131:83.254.151.33
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2095:83.254.151.33
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2029:83.254.151.33
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1961:83.254.151.33
1957:
1954:influential,
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1943:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:83.254.151.33
1869:
1866:
1863:
1862:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1616:24.253.64.178
1612:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1573:24.253.64.178
1570:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1340:
1337:— Preceding
1323:
1319:
1315:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:
975:
971:
967:
963:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
936:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
859:
855:
851:
847:
842:
841:
840:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
804:
797:
790:
785:
784:
780:
776:
765:
764:
760:
759:
758:
756:
752:
751:edit the page
748:
744:
740:
736:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
703:
700:
696:
690:
686:
682:
681:Jane Harrison
678:
677:Erich Neumann
674:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
644:
641:
638:
633:
625:
624:
620:
615:
607:
597:
596:
593:
587:
582:
574:
565:
564:
560:
556:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
535:
531:
527:
522:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
506:
502:
499:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
439:
435:
430:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
399:76.237.180.64
394:
393:
389:
385:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
310:174.49.172.92
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
282:174.49.172.92
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
253:
249:
245:
244:174.49.172.92
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
209:174.49.172.92
206:
204:
199:
191:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
163:
159:
147:
143:
139:
130:
129:
128:
127:
123:
119:
116:. Thank you.
115:
106:
100:
96:
89:
88:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5618:
5601:
5595:
5577:
5565:
5539:
5382:
5355:
5333:
5327:
5302:Sonicyouth86
5295:
5270:
5268:
5253:
5251:
5240:
5214:
5212:
5197:
5195:
5184:
5125:
5094:
5090:
5083:
5079:
5071:article text
5046:
5027:
5016:
5005:
4993:
4985:
4975:
4960:
4952:
4942:
4938:
4920:
4918:
4891:
4861:
4838:
4816:
4783:
4747:
4700:welcome page
4680:
4640:
4638:
4623:
4614:
4597:
4582:
4569:
4542:
4531:NorthAmerica
4529:
4484:
4454:
4362:
4359:
4324:
4318:
4315:
4274:
4255:
4223:JamesBWatson
4217:
4205:edit warring
4202:
4179:
4104:
4075:
4028:
4010:
4007:
4003:
3994:
3992:
3987:
3985:
3955:
3952:
3944:
3929:
3927:
3917:for deletion
3897:
3862:88.78.55.215
3859:
3854:
3852:
3849:
3841:
3823:
3793:
3767:
3723:
3677:
3644:
3633:
3610:
3603:
3562:
3539:
3509:
3476:AstroMichael
3472:
3390:
3350:
3344:
3338:
3333:
3328:
3314:
3252:
3249:
3243:
3220:— Preceding
3217:
3199:
3183:JamesBWatson
3180:
3177:Thank you...
3137:
3132:
3117:JamesBWatson
3109:
3098:JamesBWatson
3087:
3066:
3044:
3041:
3012:
3008:
2979:
2975:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2959:Harold Bloom
2943:
2936:
2895:
2881:
2874:
2833:
2830:January 2014
2810:
2780:
2761:
2758:
2711:Body politic
2707:
2663:
2660:Edit warring
2620:
2565:
2558:
2533:
2485:
2463:
2444:
2401:
2400:
2397:
2372:
2337:
2201:edit comment
2198:
1955:
1941:
1901:
1860:
1859:
1656:
1571:
1567:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1548:
1542:
1539:Thomas Szasz
1455:
1449:
1426:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1385:
1382:
1341:
1332:
1271:— Preceding
1171:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1103:
1059:216.8.169.45
1025:216.8.169.45
1022:
959:
914:— Preceding
909:
892:
866:— Preceding
862:
818:— Preceding
813:
772:
768:
727:
704:
670:
642:
603:
578:
551:
507:
503:
500:
497:
470:
448:
434:209.3.238.61
431:
426:
395:
381:
207:
202:
200:
197:
166:
155:
137:
112:
102:
60:
43:
37:
5594:This is an
5396:Sincerely,
5082:homosexual
5068:Source text
4892:Hello, and
4704:the sandbox
4043:Purefury182
3649:, click on
3568:Hello, I'm
3449:KingHiggins
3400:KingHiggins
3355:KingHiggins
3295:135.0.167.2
3257:135.0.167.2
2901:Hello, I'm
2839:Hello, I'm
1918:Please see
1844:Mark Miller
1815:Mark Miller
1786:Mark Miller
1758:Mark Miller
1725:Mark Miller
1696:Mark Miller
1666:Mark Miller
1456:bright line
920:Wadhamite55
872:Wadhamite55
824:Wadhamite55
733:Hello, I'm
510:LoreMariano
481:Brews ohare
171:, click on
36:This is an
5457:this RFC/U
4986:under the
4961:under the
4820:Solar-Wind
4598:exactly no
4489:. Thanks,
4434:Thanks. —
4140:Xxanthippe
4107:Xxanthippe
3828:. Thanks,
3617:BracketBot
3615:. Thanks,
3570:BracketBot
3559:March 2014
3544:. Thanks,
3392:statement.
2946:BracketBot
2903:BracketBot
2884:BracketBot
2841:BracketBot
2815:. Thanks,
2674:MilesMoney
2539:Rivertorch
2501:Rivertorch
2467:Regarding
2295:Steeletrap
2244:MilesMoney
2210:MilesMoney
1694:editing.--
1662:Nikkimaria
1450:Remember,
775:BracketBot
735:BracketBot
709:. Thanks,
339:Nightspore
5638:Archive 5
5630:Archive 3
5625:Archive 2
5619:Archive 1
5552:Christmas
5334:one month
4473:Read the
4356:Heidegger
4325:Thanks —
4241:article.
3812:Read the
3680:Prostějov
3651:this link
3647:this list
3574:your edit
3546:10.4.0.34
3528:Read the
3353:article.
2907:your edit
2845:your edit
2799:Read the
2203:violates
1496:. Cheers
1433:Technopat
999:Roscelese
962:Roscelese
739:your edit
693:Read the
591:EarwigBot
173:this link
169:this list
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
5556:WikiLove
5364:first.
5354:|reason=
5271:articles
5215:articles
4834:Georgism
4789:goethean
4696:reverted
4677:May 2014
4627:contribs
4617:RHaworth
4586:contribs
4576:RHaworth
4504:Talkback
4436:goethean
4393:goethean
4365:goethean
4271:Biopower
4239:Biopower
4033:and the
3957:MastCell
3900:Froglich
3768:Prussian
3289:Moved. (
3222:unsigned
3206:Scott P.
3096:first.
3086:|reason=
2944:Thanks,
2882:Thanks,
2730:WP:UNDUE
2561:see here
1631:WP:NPOVN
1357:contribs
1345:unsigned
1285:contribs
1273:unsigned
1194:WP:Civil
1007:contribs
970:contribs
928:contribs
916:unsigned
880:contribs
868:unsigned
832:contribs
820:unsigned
801:You can
773:Thanks,
5597:archive
5352:unblock
5329:blocked
5279:Stefan2
5223:Stefan2
4914:blocked
4845:Collect
4767:MrBill3
4743:WP:AN/I
4708:MrBill3
4641:nothing
4553:Stilgar
4491:DPL bot
4086:DonIago
3940:deleted
3830:DPL bot
3689:Olomouc
3340:theory.
3253:summary
3084:unblock
3068:blocked
3046:Dnikkir
3014:Dnikkir
2981:Dnikkir
2817:DPL bot
2631:MrBill3
2629:). - -
2378:MrBill3
2373:I agree
2341:MrBill3
2281:S. Rich
1942:Urvater
1498:Jim1138
1460:Jim1138
1223:Flyer22
1100:Scruton
893:exactly
711:DPL bot
651:Trouver
555:Trouver
223:edits.
39:archive
5379:Bummer
5130:WP:NFC
4294:WP:OWN
4008:Best,
3999:WP:MOS
3685:Vienna
3582:syntax
3321:WP:BLP
2915:syntax
2853:syntax
2670:WP:BRD
2475:, and
2205:WP:AGF
1920:WP:BRD
1898:Fichte
1452:wp:3RR
1349:Beauvy
1277:Beauvy
1211:tildes
1156:Beauvy
846:WP:DUE
747:syntax
142:Danger
5568:subst
5549:Merry
5366:Bbb23
4813:Hello
4327:kwami
4312:WP:EL
4180:See:
4078:WP:3O
3351:whole
2199:Your
1454:is a
1219:an IP
1209:four
993:It's
194:Bloom
97:This
16:<
5545:talk
5508:talk
5494:talk
5480:talk
5465:talk
5446:talk
5431:talk
5417:talk
5402:talk
5370:talk
5336:for
5306:talk
5300:. --
5283:talk
5227:talk
5093:gay
5052:ISBN
4976:See
4965:and
4943:See
4849:talk
4824:talk
4803:talk
4771:talk
4753:talk
4728:talk
4712:talk
4667:talk
4651:talk
4621:talk
4606:talk
4580:talk
4557:talk
4495:talk
4414:talk
4379:talk
4346:talk
4331:talk
4316:Hi,
4302:talk
4282:talk
4276:back
4262:talk
4247:talk
4227:talk
4190:talk
4160:talk
4144:talk
4128:talk
4111:talk
4090:talk
4062:talk
4047:talk
4031:SitC
4016:talk
3988:cost
3972:talk
3904:talk
3882:talk
3866:talk
3834:talk
3776:talk
3750:talk
3732:talk
3712:talk
3697:talk
3687:and
3663:talk
3621:talk
3550:talk
3496:talk
3480:talk
3453:talk
3427:talk
3404:talk
3375:talk
3359:talk
3299:talk
3277:talk
3261:talk
3230:talk
3210:talk
3187:talk
3167:talk
3151:talk
3121:talk
3102:talk
3050:talk
3033:talk
3018:talk
3000:talk
2985:talk
2950:talk
2888:talk
2821:talk
2767:talk
2738:talk
2719:talk
2694:talk
2678:talk
2666:this
2650:talk
2635:talk
2605:talk
2587:talk
2572:talk
2543:talk
2520:talk
2505:talk
2477:this
2473:this
2469:this
2451:talk
2431:talk
2382:talk
2360:talk
2345:talk
2334:Trio
2314:talk
2299:talk
2285:talk
2271:talk
2248:talk
2230:talk
2214:talk
2173:talk
2135:talk
2099:talk
2064:talk
2033:talk
1988:talk
1965:talk
1928:talk
1909:talk
1848:talk
1833:talk
1819:talk
1804:talk
1790:talk
1776:talk
1762:talk
1747:talk
1729:talk
1715:talk
1700:talk
1685:talk
1670:talk
1639:talk
1620:talk
1609:and
1593:talk
1577:talk
1543:Re:
1525:talk
1502:talk
1480:talk
1464:talk
1437:talk
1413:talk
1374:talk
1353:talk
1318:talk
1281:talk
1249:talk
1227:talk
1215:~~~~
1196:and
1180:talk
1160:talk
1127:talk
1111:talk
1107:Jprw
1086:talk
1063:talk
1045:talk
1029:talk
1003:talk
985:talk
966:talk
946:talk
924:talk
901:talk
876:talk
854:talk
828:talk
779:talk
766:* ''
715:talk
679:and
655:talk
618:6403
613:Cabe
559:talk
530:talk
514:talk
485:talk
457:talk
449:Agon
438:talk
418:talk
403:talk
388:talk
357:talk
343:talk
329:talk
314:talk
300:talk
286:talk
271:talk
248:talk
229:talk
213:talk
198:Hi,
185:talk
138:Done
122:talk
5541:BOZ
5504:BOZ
5476:BOZ
5461:BOZ
5427:BOZ
5398:BOZ
5292:SPI
5266:).
5210:).
5126:may
5116:or
4921:not
4780:AFD
4475:FAQ
4461:Cre
4225:" (
3995:all
3814:FAQ
3678:As
3576:to
3530:FAQ
3244:In
2909:to
2847:to
2801:FAQ
2664:In
2534:way
2414:ian
2409:dar
2404:Ish
1956:but
1446:3RR
1221:).
769:]''
741:to
695:FAQ
467:RfC
144:!
5634:→
5510:)
5496:)
5482:)
5467:)
5448:)
5433:)
5419:)
5404:)
5372:)
5358:}}
5350:{{
5308:)
5285:)
5229:)
5014:.
4974:.
4953:or
4851:)
4826:)
4805:)
4787:—
4773:)
4730:)
4714:)
4669:)
4653:)
4629:)
4608:)
4588:)
4559:)
4497:)
4467:|
4416:)
4381:)
4348:)
4333:)
4304:)
4284:)
4264:)
4249:)
4229:)
4192:)
4162:)
4150:.
4146:)
4130:)
4117:.
4113:)
4092:)
4064:)
4049:)
4018:)
3974:)
3942:.
3906:)
3884:)
3868:)
3857:"
3836:)
3806:|
3778:)
3752:)
3734:)
3714:)
3699:)
3665:)
3623:)
3592:.
3552:)
3522:|
3498:)
3482:)
3455:)
3429:)
3406:)
3377:)
3361:)
3327:'
3301:)
3293:)
3279:)
3263:)
3232:)
3212:)
3189:)
3169:)
3153:)
3123:)
3104:)
3090:}}
3082:{{
3052:)
3035:)
3020:)
3002:)
2987:)
2952:)
2925:.
2890:)
2863:.
2823:)
2793:|
2769:)
2740:)
2721:)
2696:)
2680:)
2652:)
2637:)
2607:)
2589:)
2574:)
2545:)
2522:)
2507:)
2471:,
2453:)
2433:)
2384:)
2362:)
2347:)
2316:)
2301:)
2287:)
2273:)
2250:)
2232:)
2216:)
2175:)
2137:)
2101:)
2066:)
2035:)
1990:)
1967:)
1930:)
1911:)
1864:iz
1850:)
1835:)
1821:)
1806:)
1792:)
1778:)
1764:)
1749:)
1731:)
1717:)
1702:)
1687:)
1672:)
1641:)
1622:)
1595:)
1579:)
1527:)
1504:)
1482:)
1466:)
1439:)
1415:)
1376:)
1359:)
1355:•
1320:)
1287:)
1283:•
1251:)
1229:)
1182:)
1162:)
1129:)
1113:)
1088:)
1065:)
1047:)
1031:)
1009:)
1005:â‹…
987:)
972:)
968:â‹…
948:)
930:)
926:•
903:)
882:)
878:•
856:)
834:)
830:•
781:)
757:.
717:)
687:|
657:)
561:)
532:)
516:)
487:)
479:.
459:)
440:)
420:)
405:)
390:)
359:)
345:)
331:)
316:)
302:)
288:)
273:)
250:)
231:)
215:)
187:)
124:)
76:→
5608:.
5570::
5543:(
5506:(
5492:(
5478:(
5463:(
5444:(
5429:(
5415:(
5400:(
5368:(
5304:(
5281:(
5246:âš
5225:(
5190:âš
5059:.
4847:(
4822:(
4801:(
4769:(
4751:(
4726:(
4710:(
4665:(
4649:(
4624:·
4619:(
4604:(
4583:·
4578:(
4555:(
4519:.
4493:(
4481:.
4463:(
4412:(
4377:(
4344:(
4329:(
4300:(
4280:(
4260:(
4245:(
4221:"
4188:(
4158:(
4142:(
4126:(
4109:(
4088:(
4060:(
4045:(
4014:(
3970:(
3902:(
3880:(
3864:(
3832:(
3820:.
3802:(
3774:(
3748:(
3730:(
3710:(
3695:(
3661:(
3619:(
3604:(
3548:(
3536:.
3518:(
3494:(
3478:(
3451:(
3425:(
3402:(
3373:(
3357:(
3297:(
3275:(
3259:(
3228:(
3208:(
3185:(
3165:(
3149:(
3119:(
3100:(
3048:(
3031:(
3016:(
2998:(
2983:(
2948:(
2937:(
2886:(
2875:]
2819:(
2807:.
2789:(
2765:(
2736:(
2717:(
2692:(
2676:(
2648:(
2633:(
2603:(
2585:(
2570:(
2541:(
2518:(
2503:(
2449:(
2429:(
2380:(
2358:(
2343:(
2312:(
2297:(
2283:(
2269:(
2246:(
2228:(
2212:(
2171:(
2133:(
2097:(
2062:(
2031:(
1986:(
1963:(
1926:(
1907:(
1861:L
1846:(
1831:(
1817:(
1802:(
1788:(
1774:(
1760:(
1745:(
1727:(
1713:(
1698:(
1683:(
1668:(
1637:(
1629:(
1618:(
1591:(
1575:(
1523:(
1500:(
1478:(
1462:(
1435:(
1411:(
1372:(
1351:(
1316:(
1279:(
1247:(
1225:(
1178:(
1158:(
1125:(
1109:(
1084:(
1061:(
1043:(
1027:(
1001:(
983:(
964:(
944:(
922:(
899:(
874:(
852:(
826:(
798:.
777:(
713:(
701:.
683:(
653:(
584:"
557:(
528:(
512:(
483:(
455:(
436:(
416:(
401:(
386:(
355:(
341:(
327:(
312:(
298:(
284:(
269:(
246:(
227:(
211:(
183:(
120:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.