1214:(In some ideal world we could have taken a detailed look at the edit histories of the litigants and spend time learning who they are. That is not possible of course. We are short of admins (I hear), and it's probable that admins (including you) are under a lot of stress for this reason and just because of the demands of the position. This is a problem and I don't know the answer to that, but I would say that if one doesn't have the time to do a thing right (perfectly understandable) one should consider passing on it -- maybe someone who does have more time will come along.)
31:
1185:. Looking at Flyer22's user page (and edit chart), I see the markers of a good editor, while Bakhshi82's page tells me nothing and his edit chart is sparse and unimpressive. One can't really form an opinion about Bakhshi82 from this quick overview, but in my opinion it would be very unusual for a user with Flyer22's editing history to be a bad editor. It's not unheard of. But it's not likely. (And in fact, Flyer22 is a very good editor.)
1506:
1436:, is hard to interpret as a good faith edit. In effect, he seems to be saying, "the world needs this new term, and I'm going to bootstrap it into the discourse on nuclear power by having a Knowledge article under that name." It would essentially license people to say, literally, "there was a nuclear explosion at Fukushima."
1601:
at the moment. You'd be most welcome to comment on the attached Talk page, or you can ignore this if you prefer. I'm not asking for you to be troutslapped, I see no risk to you! And I think you've been very nice, in fact, patiently explaining your reasons. I just think you were incorrect, or, perhaps
1439:
This is pretty stressful for me, since I have an almost-empty reservations calendar now, owing almost entirely to global radiation phobia (my inn's customer base is 98% inbound tourists coming to Japan). I'm looking at possible business failure, and from what was once a pretty healthy small business
1293:
I believe I'd be permitted to revert the IP's edit, without penalty under ARBPIA, even though it's within 24 hours of my last reversion to the article, since the talk page says, "edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty"? I'll refrain from doing so, however, until you're able to
1103:
Flyer22 has been a
Wikipedian for four years. She has 46,000 edits (65% to article space). She has nine barnstars, five DYK's, four GA's, and many other accomplishments, all of which can be seen with a quick scan of her user page. In addition, she is an outstanding, fair-minded, erudite, and talented
753:
Re. war editing. Why are you accusing me of it when two people are reverting the repeated edits of one person? You give the appearance of being biased - especially given your attempt to redefine the scope of the article. Also, you should note that the other user has a long history of war editing this
419:
I actually get along better with Giano and
Malleus than a lot of people seem to think. They're just as deserving of my praise (rare, but happens) and support if someone starts abusing them (has happened with both) as any other editor. My disagreements with their civility approach don't reach to the
1238:
Thank you for the continued support, Herostratus. To
Georgewilliamherbert, I don't have much more to state...except that this matter had nothing to do with me biting Bakhshi82. It was about what I reported at the Noticeboard. We tried to help/assist/accommodate Bakhshi82, so I am not seeing a biting
1223:
Well, at any rate... whether or not you could have or should have been expected to read the situation differently, in point of fact you did make a mistake (as we all do, often enough -- God knows I do), so to rectify this, could I prevail upon you to perhaps drop a note on Flyer22's talk page to the
789:
Lacking the conditions for a leaked material to "go critical" and sustain a chain reaction, the material is not fissile. Radioactive, yes, but the article's definition (which I did not write, but I merely observe and aim to stay consistent with) says that mere radioactive releases are listed on the
1109:
Bakhshi82 has been a
Wikipedian for less than a year. He has 165 edits (30% to article space). This is not counting whatever editing he has done under various IPs or previously-banned usernames. He is... not a good editor, let us say; I'll leave the particulars as an exercise for the reader, along
631:
In any case, I have no doubt whatsoever that your concerns were legit. Only reason I even bring it up is just to let you know (and presumably, through you, other "honchos" and "dieties", etc.) that this user is TRULY one of the PIONEERS in his field (cancer pathology). Absolutely no question about
1117:
So when Flyer22 comes here with a legitimate complaint, what happens? She gets jumped and then hung out to dry. What a ludicrous spectacle. And you people wonder why established editors are getting pissed off and leaving. "Come to ANI"? Why yes sir I'll bring my next problem right to ANI, just as
1176:
45,000 edits (and commensurate other good-editor markers -- GA's, DYK's, articles created, barnstars, years in service, or whatever). If you've got to piss off one of them, who are you going to chose? The one has a 1% chance of becoming very valuable someday, while the other has a 100% chance of
782:
Again - You seem to misunderstand the word "fissile". Rock contains uranium at 2-10 parts per billion typically - is rock fissile because it has uranium in it naturally? Is seawater fissile because it contains uranium? Are the
Fiestaware plates in my kitchen (that I do not eat off of...) with
726:
You are as confused about this issue as the user who is war editing the article to continue his long-running campaign of trying to censor as many incidents as he can from the list. The IAEA issues INES warnings for nuclear incidents because they reach a significant severity. They issued one for
1123:
By "hung out to dry" I was referencing in part your statements where you, at best, appear to be treating the two editors equally, if not treating
Bakhshi82 more solicitously ("You've crossed the line into harrassing... Please just stop" to Flyer22 contrasted with "not entirely appropriate" to
1322:
I've botched an AfD listing for this recreated article. Tsk. In the course of reviewing the wreckage, however, I noticed that you contributed a mild keep comment with some very interesting points. I'm not sure the facts you raise about very-low-yield nuclear explosives rise to the level of
385:
Sticking my admin hat on for a moment; so as one admin to another. Your interaction with Giano is negative. Your comments at the current ANI thread simply look bad faith atempts to haver yet another go at Giano. I don't like you - you don't like me. That's fair enough. But try to be a smidge
1358:
I did a little work for Lurnix. An abortive stab at writing a tutorial on Unix device drivers. Years later, I taught one C++ course in the
Chicago area, on an emergency-substitute basis. (On the second day of teaching, I learned from my students that they'd all actually signed up for an
882:
In case you don't see it, I said on the "Incidents" page - I already TRIED this "please do something else" approach, literally BEGGING him. He does what he wants, over and over, in area after area, without consultation, and it doesn't MATTER what others think. Look at his history! It's all
474:. I trust that Arbs and Admins will ensure that this is the end of the matter. I don't intend to be insulted or trolled by this person again. I hope it will not be necessary for me to have to comment further. I will try to leave it to the Admins and Arbs as I always being told to do.
411:
I clarified who the subject of that particular comment was on ANI and apologized if I confused anyone. The ONLY part of my comment there I intended to be critical of Giano was agreeing that perhaps there was too much OWN, but that a talk page discussion was the appropriate venue for
859:
You are correct about my rant. I will not do it again. However, I respectfully ask that you keep in mind what is the cart, and what is the horse. Were it not for this guys behavior, myself and numerous other people would not be OUTRAGED, and NONE of this would have happened.
1290:. A school and home address, respectively, I'd guess. The 190.x IP is, of course, blocked as having been used for socking by Andres. Wasn't Andres also located in Argentina? This doesn't look good to me. I know very little about sock detection. Can you help?
415:
To the degree that appeared to be a swipe at Giano, I'm sorry for making the comment. I understand why someone would be concerned that I might be sniping at him, but that was entirely not my intention, and I am sorry that I wasn't clear enough to start
1127:
Why on earth would you do this? Perhaps you were just tired or not paying attention, or what? Is there going to be an apology to Flyer22 forthcoming, I hope? We don't want to be seen as being egregiously abusive to good long-term editors, I think.
646:
He was unblocked a couple of days later by another administrator after the issue with copyrights was worked out. Indefinite does not mean permanent around here. He seems to have been a very constructive contributor around here since then!
936:
312:
Those images don't have their original copyright information available for them, that I can tell. We have to be careful about using images without proper copyright. We have a whole huge policy here to keep us from stealing other people's
832:
That was because he already had that template warning, in
December, and you didn't. Everyone participating in that topic and pushing any of our limits gets the warning. You clearly were pushing limits today, whether you violated them or
1571:
1180:
When a situation like this comes up, it is in my opinion worthwhile to take quick look at the user pages of the editors in question (this is an important reason why we have user pages in my view), followed up perhaps by a use of an
745:
Also, multiple events on the page could be excluded if the criteria was that the material that leaked must be in a form that would be capable of sustaining fission. But that is not the criteria - it simply says that the event
1090:
1174:
While not biting newbies is important, not biting good established editors is very much more important. Let's say that of editors with < 200 edits, one in one hundred (being very generous) will turn out to end up with :
736:...banned the drinking of water, fishing and consumption of fish in three rivers and three ponds. Swimming and water sports were also forbidden as was irrigation of crops with the water containing the toxic material.
420:
level of disrespect for their participation or contributions or personal dislike. I'm not sure either of them entirely believe me on that point, but I really don't resent them and I'm really not out to get them.
1156:
Nobody can predict what's going to come next. But not BITEing the newbie, who wasn't doing great but wasn't previously being that wierd, is important. Important enough to be policy. Try to remember that, too.
662:
1367:
crossed.) My connection to Lurnix was mostly through Jean Tantra, the Mac programmer who rented cubbyhole office space at the
Shattuck office for years, studiously avoiding anything to do with Unix.
1271:, stated that he didn't like a particular edit. You asked for an explanation. So far (?) he hasn't provided one, but IP 157.92.44.71 responded, saying the article in question should only include wars
1239:
going on in all of this. And either way, the situation I reported should not have been looked at from a bite point of view. Those are my continued feelings on this, and well... I'll leave it at that.
793:
I didn't remove anything from anywhere, I haven't edited the article itself. Please discuss this on the talk page, and reconsider the actual technical meaning of the word fissile (which our article
688:
1326:
By the way, I think we crossed paths briefly at LURNIX quite a few years ago. Not long before that encounter, you'd been at an ISU session somewhere, maybe in Kyushu? (I live in Tokyo now.)
826:
316:
If you know where they came from (other than "thefirearmblog.com", I mean the original photographer or magazine or wherever), then that's the place to start asking for proper permission...
1360:
1279:, restoring Andres' preferred version. This strikes me as pretty darn close to meatpuppetry; I don't think an editor who was blocked for IP socking should be proposing ... wait a minute.
443:
1525:
1549:
481:
817:
Is there a reason that you have failed to send your template warning to the other guy who was actually guilty of vandalism?It is not doing your credibility any good I can tell you.
1700:
1686:
845:
1533:
1420:, but without explaining how he thinks he's engaged in actually improving Knowledge rather than in disruptive editing. Rather desperately, he has even resorted to arguing that
1233:
1166:
812:
656:
518:
328:
1541:
1483:
1376:
1353:
806:
1323:
notability that would justify an article under that name (or any other), but it does sound like the information should go into some
Knowledge article, if it hasn't already.
786:
Fissile is a technical word. It means capable if sustaining a chain reaction. Uranium that is in low concentrations or not enriched enough cannot sustain a chain reaction.
727:
Tricastin. By your logic, that because there is massively dilute uranium in the oceans, the IAEA would issue an INES warning because the oceans exist. But they do not. That
408:
I don't dislike you, and I appear to have accidentally looked like I was taking a swipe at Giano (the stream of insults and ANI comment) that I intended to point at Blofeld.
464:
429:
386:
professional and not intervene in a situation that has all the apperance of you just wanting to have your three pence, without understanding the deeper conversations. Ta.
1201:, really; there are a lot of editors with < 200 edits who are ______. While if the converse had turned out to be true (Flyer22 being a ______ and Bakhshi82 not), that
1629:
1004:
558:
195:
102:
963:
1335:
1012:
996:
566:
550:
203:
187:
110:
94:
374:
1020:
574:
211:
118:
1248:
863:
How this guy has managed to continue to do what he does for so long is just beyond me. I hope you will take the time to review HIS TALK PAGE, and all its archives.
86:
1309:
1583:
179:
980:
679:
is exactly what I mean about harassment, and about only one of us not being able to let things go. I am not the one you need to be warning/telling to move on.
534:
163:
70:
1049:
603:
240:
773:
628:. Seems something got worked out on this after the above post, as I've seen him around since under same name. Therefore, this post is probably meaningless.
491:
147:
1671:
894:
874:
1567:
1137:
988:
905:
542:
171:
78:
1341:
Small world! Yes, I was at Lurnix. I spent the 1992 summer at ISU in Kitakyushu, yes. Were you working at Lurnix, or did you take a training there?
750:". Uranium is a fissile material. The leak came from a civilian nuclear facility. The Tricastin event very clearly meets the criteria for inclusion.
306:
1079:
664:
632:
it. Having him around is sort of like having Wayne Gretzky editing hockey articles, or having God edit on cosmology. No doubt you get my drift :-)
948:
1118:
soon as I finish pounding in some tent pegs with my forehead, which will be a more productive and certainly more pleasant use of my time. Sheesh.
917:
1465:
640:
472:
1314:
1059:
I just wanted to drop a thank you, "Thank You"; for your reenforcement, and in my mind, moral support. I honestly hate having to dress down
937:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:User:Alan Liefting gratuitous removal of notable people from category, edit warring etc.
716:
1640:
1505:
267:
1611:
760:
Again: the Tricastin incident involved significant release of uranium and therefore clearly complies with the scope of the article: "
721:
1489:
1224:
effect that you regret the unfortunate outcome and any part you might have played in it? That would be outstanding, in my opinion.
1258:
1652:
1456:
away from it. Hence my admittedly strange request -- to you, the only WP admin I've actually met, even if you don't remember me.
1143:
Before the ANI thread, it seemed to be a less sophisticated newbie with good intentions in conflict with a more experienced user.
402:
1389:
This request is a little odd, but here goes: could you block me? For maybe a week? But without prejudice, if that's possible?
1513:
1037:
954:
Apparently it has been archived. Since this discussion is still ongoing, should the archiving of this thread be reverted? ----
836:
I was continuing to review the situation and have blocked him for a week. I need to review your behavior in more depth next.
591:
228:
135:
1433:
1091:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Editor Bakhshi82 changing and removing editors' comments, and making threats
1264:
1093:, where a number of editors have expressed displeasure with how this was handled (specifically, by you). My comment was:
969:
523:
152:
59:
1602:
more accurately, imbalanced, that's all. You will be notified again, of course, when the request is filed. Thanks. --
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
1682:
1625:
1479:
1349:
1162:
841:
802:
652:
439:
425:
324:
1662:"Involvement reviewed and within policy, if perhaps not best practice." -- that was about how I saw it. Thanks. --
1401:
1397:
1084:
676:
264:
1276:
851:
47:
17:
1448:
violations. I don't know how to contain myself on this subject. I just don't know how to back away from the
1188:
Given that, I would think it would be in order to say to oneself "Well, wait a minute. What is going on here?"
1393:
1657:
1028:
582:
535:
Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
219:
126:
1441:
1413:
1405:
1316:
675:
As you may or may not have seen, I replied there (disagreeing with your assessment of my actions). And
38:
1678:
1621:
1475:
1345:
1158:
1033:
837:
798:
648:
587:
478:
435:
421:
320:
245:
224:
131:
1432:
in the AfD discussion, his continued use of the term "moderated nuclear explosion" in, for example,
619:
543:
Knowledge accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
1594:
GWH, I'm preparing to file an appeal at ArbComm/Requests for clarification, of your ban of me from
1054:
471:
As Blofeld is still posting on this matter in relevant places: I have commented on the matter here
1696:
1667:
899:
822:
1304:
922:
704:
698:
1599:
1449:
1440:
up to the morning of March 11th, even during this global recession. My contributions to the
1384:
1229:
1133:
959:
944:
890:
870:
636:
779:
I'm not trying to redefine the scope, the scope is explicitly listed in the article already.
503:
1268:
1072:
1045:
599:
514:
475:
370:
302:
236:
180:
Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
143:
111:
AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
8:
1461:
1372:
1331:
1193:
Now, as it turned out, Bakhshi82 is apparently a ______ and Flyer22 is not. We couldn't
1692:
1663:
1635:
1579:
1344:
I will look in to what to do with the info in that article. Thanks for the heads up.
928:
913:
818:
769:
608:
981:
Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
1589:
1296:
1244:
684:
79:
Academic contributions; Jimmy Wales weighs in on murder trial controversy; brief news
506:
1566:
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section
1425:
1225:
1129:
955:
940:
932:
620:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive553
1445:
1067:
1041:
866:
Again, I'm sorry, but PLEASE do something about his antics. They are RIDICULOUS.
712:
595:
510:
457:
395:
366:
342:
298:
295:
232:
139:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1457:
1368:
1327:
1153:
I agree that the stuff afterwards on Flyer22's talk page went into creepyville.
1147:
989:
Low-hanging fruit and sustainability; Qwiki on iPad; sceptic critic; brief news
1648:
1607:
1575:
1429:
1417:
1409:
1171:
OK, well, thanks for responding. A couple points, which are just my opinion.
909:
765:
1287:
1240:
680:
625:
1283:
164:
Editor retention; Malayalam loves Wikimedia; Wikimedia reports; brief news
1595:
434:
As an aside - I am offline for work meetings for a couple of hours now.
380:
1104:
editor who works hard in a number of difficult areas, and has for years.
172:
What if experts just want to get their links into Knowledge?; brief news
708:
451:
389:
1098:
May I point something out? Here we have a dispute between two editors:
1063:
editor, regardless of tenure, age, or experience. Cheers and Best, —
1182:
567:
Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
1620:
You're welcome to make the appeal; I will comment once it's filed.
783:
Uranium oxide yellow glaze fissile? The answer is no, in all cases.
755:
256:
These articles have no image. Could you upload some images to them?
1644:
1603:
927:
George, do you know what happened to the ANI thread pertaining to
794:
1363:
course. I'm still not sure how signals could have gotten quite
1677:
No prob. Thanks for having listened to the feedback on that.
764:" from a civilian nuclear facility. Please reinstate the edit.
616:
I happened to stumble across this old page from "forever ago":
500:
492:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
338:
334:
291:
260:
250:
246:
1570:. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the
1471:
Why don't you just back away and let me respond for a bit...
1550:
Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers
904:
Since you are the blocking admin, you may be interested in
1267:
a user blocked for socking... via an IP, as I recall(?),
504:
http://www.gun-world.net/russain/kalash/ak100/newak37.jpg
204:
Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
1013:
Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
1474:
Block is sort of excessive. Even if you're stressed.
813:
Have not seen you send a warning to the guy responsible
87:
Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
71:
1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
906:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim
1110:with the assessment of this editor's mental state.
756:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Nailedtooth#STOP
507:http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/1716/3357331.jpg
1534:The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
703:Letting you know that I mentioned your name in
665:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1150:. That applied at the time and applies now.
1021:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
742:had leaked?! Your reasoning is nonsensical.
575:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
119:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
95:Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
1197:that in advance, necessarily. But it's not
734:Do you really think the French would have "
869:Best regards: Cliff L. Knickerbocker, MS (
635:Best regards: Cliff L. Knickerbocker, MS (
1542:Contest results, A-class medal recipients
1263:In a particular section on his talk page
762:The event should involve fissile material
1643:, it mentions you, of course. Thanks. --
1428:theory. Since he's already admitted to
551:An audience with the WikiProject Council
1510:
14:
1146:We have a policy about this, and it's
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1641:the RfAr/Clarification has been filed
1444:AfD discussion seem to be verging on
1408:, has openly admitted he's violating
889:Regards: Cliff L. Knickerbocker, MS (
624:... wherein you refer to an indef on
1691:Oh okay, I did not know.. Sorry. --
212:The Toolserver explained; brief news
25:
23:
448:Thank you for the clarifications.
24:
1714:
1396:and then, breaking that promise,
1205:have been unusual and surprising.
1515:Your Military History Newsletter
1504:
1402:the immediately following change
1294:take a look at this. Thanks, –
29:
1400:. Note that the editor making
748:should involve fissile material
1392:Background for the request is
1177:being very valuable currently.
931:? I think It was initiated by
18:User talk:Georgewilliamherbert
13:
1:
1259:Andreas Herutjaim's talk page
935:and had the section heading:
495:, Not from "The Firearm Blog"
1617:Ok, thanks for the heads up.
722:Tricastin leak and 'fissile'
7:
1442:moderated nuclear explosion
1416:, and has also appealed to
1414:moderated nuclear explosion
1406:moderated nuclear explosion
1404:, which restores a link to
1317:moderated nuclear explosion
1089:Regarding the situation at
10:
1719:
1701:22:56, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1687:21:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1672:21:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1653:06:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1630:22:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1612:22:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1584:01:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
1499:
1484:18:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1466:10:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1452:. So: maybe I need to be
1412:in the AfD discussion for
1377:02:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1354:19:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
1336:15:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
1310:06:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
1284:is located in Buenos Aires
1249:15:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
1234:16:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
1167:09:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
1138:05:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
1080:10:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
1050:00:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
1029:Read this Signpost in full
964:21:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
949:14:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
918:23:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
895:17:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
875:16:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
846:06:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
827:06:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
807:18:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
774:11:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
717:07:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
689:23:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
657:21:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
641:10:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
604:05:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
583:Read this Signpost in full
519:01:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
482:12:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
465:22:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
444:22:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
430:22:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
403:22:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
375:06:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
329:03:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
307:02:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
241:09:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
220:Read this Signpost in full
127:Read this Signpost in full
1286:, where IP 190.17.232.48
754:and other nuclear pages:
148:00:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
1598:, a current draft is at
1493:: Issue LXI, March 2011
259:Here are the links for
1282:I see IP 157.92.44.71
1273:as Israel defines them
852:I Agree, and Apologize
731:give you a huge clue.
1085:What's the deal here?
1003:Features and admins:
557:Features and admins:
194:Features and admins:
101:Features and admins:
42:of past discussions.
1679:Georgewilliamherbert
1658:Block review closing
1622:Georgewilliamherbert
1476:Georgewilliamherbert
1424:it would be notable
1346:Georgewilliamherbert
1159:Georgewilliamherbert
1011:Arbitration report:
1005:The best of the week
997:WikiProject Somerset
995:WikiProject report:
838:Georgewilliamherbert
799:Georgewilliamherbert
649:Georgewilliamherbert
565:Arbitration report:
559:The best of the week
549:WikiProject report:
436:Georgewilliamherbert
422:Georgewilliamherbert
321:Georgewilliamherbert
202:Arbitration report:
196:The best of the week
186:WikiProject report:
109:Arbitration report:
103:The best of the week
93:WikiProject report:
1019:Technology report:
663:Your assessment at
573:Technology report:
210:Technology report:
117:Technology report:
1434:this recent change
929:User:Alan Liefting
85:Editor retention:
1563:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1078:
797:covers nicely).
463:
401:
188:WikiProject Japan
178:Recent research:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1710:
1586:
1526:From the editors
1516:
1508:
1501:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1308:
1301:
1077:
1075:
1064:
1055:Thank You George
979:News and notes:
933:User:Rememberway
707:ArbCom request.
533:News and notes:
462:
460:
449:
400:
398:
387:
365:, use Google. --
162:News and notes:
69:News and notes:
33:
32:
26:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1660:
1638:
1592:
1565:
1555:
1519:
1514:
1495:
1387:
1320:
1297:
1295:
1288:is also located
1269:AndresHerutJaim
1261:
1183:edit summarizer
1087:
1073:
1065:
1057:
1052:
1025:
975:
973:: 25 April 2011
925:
902:
900:AndresHerutJaim
854:
815:
724:
701:
677:this right here
668:
611:
606:
579:
529:
527:: 18 April 2011
497:
458:
450:
396:
388:
383:
343:ST Kinetics CPW
254:
243:
216:
158:
156:: 11 April 2011
150:
123:
65:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1716:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1659:
1656:
1637:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1618:
1591:
1588:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1554:
1553:
1545:
1537:
1529:
1523:Project News:
1520:
1511:
1509:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1472:
1450:WP:BATTLEFIELD
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1342:
1319:
1313:
1275:and then made
1260:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1178:
1154:
1151:
1144:
1121:
1120:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1106:
1086:
1083:
1056:
1053:
1026:
1024:
1023:
1016:
1015:
1008:
1007:
1000:
999:
992:
991:
984:
983:
976:
974:
968:
967:
966:
924:
923:What happened?
921:
901:
898:
887:
886:
885:
884:
853:
850:
849:
848:
834:
814:
811:
810:
809:
791:
787:
784:
780:
723:
720:
700:
699:ArbCom request
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
667:
661:
660:
659:
610:
607:
580:
578:
577:
570:
569:
562:
561:
554:
553:
546:
545:
538:
537:
530:
528:
522:
496:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
468:
467:
417:
413:
409:
382:
379:
378:
377:
333:If you search
331:
317:
314:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
253:
244:
217:
215:
214:
207:
206:
199:
198:
191:
190:
183:
182:
175:
174:
167:
166:
159:
157:
151:
124:
122:
121:
114:
113:
106:
105:
98:
97:
90:
89:
82:
81:
74:
73:
66:
64:
63:: 4 April 2011
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1715:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1693:Khodabandeh14
1690:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:SarekOfVulcan
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1597:
1587:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1544:
1543:
1538:
1536:
1535:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1492:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1437:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1385:Block request
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1324:
1318:
1312:
1311:
1306:
1302:
1300:
1291:
1289:
1285:
1280:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1184:
1179:
1173:
1172:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1125:
1124:Bakhshi82).
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1082:
1081:
1076:
1070:
1069:
1062:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1002:
1001:
998:
994:
993:
990:
987:In the news:
986:
985:
982:
978:
977:
972:
965:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
920:
919:
915:
911:
908:. Thank you.
907:
897:
896:
892:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
872:
867:
864:
861:
857:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
819:Owain the 1st
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
785:
781:
778:
777:
776:
775:
771:
767:
763:
758:
757:
751:
749:
743:
741:
737:
732:
730:
719:
718:
714:
710:
706:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
666:
658:
654:
650:
645:
644:
643:
642:
638:
633:
629:
627:
622:
621:
617:
614:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
576:
572:
571:
568:
564:
563:
560:
556:
555:
552:
548:
547:
544:
541:In the news:
540:
539:
536:
532:
531:
526:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
502:
494:
483:
480:
477:
473:
470:
469:
466:
461:
455:
454:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
393:
392:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
288:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
257:
252:
248:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
213:
209:
208:
205:
201:
200:
197:
193:
192:
189:
185:
184:
181:
177:
176:
173:
170:In the news:
169:
168:
165:
161:
160:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
120:
116:
115:
112:
108:
107:
104:
100:
99:
96:
92:
91:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:In the news:
76:
75:
72:
68:
67:
62:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1661:
1639:
1593:
1564:
1548:
1540:
1532:
1524:
1512:
1490:
1453:
1438:
1421:
1391:
1388:
1364:
1325:
1321:
1299:OhioStandard
1298:
1292:
1281:
1272:
1262:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1108:
1102:
1097:
1088:
1066:
1060:
1058:
1027:
971:The Signpost
970:
926:
903:
888:
868:
865:
862:
858:
855:
816:
790:other lists.
761:
759:
752:
747:
744:
739:
735:
733:
728:
725:
702:
634:
630:
626:User:Mrwick1
623:
618:
615:
612:
581:
525:The Signpost
524:
498:
452:
390:
384:
289:
258:
255:
218:
154:The Signpost
153:
125:
61:The Signpost
60:
55:
43:
37:
1596:Cold fusion
1547:Editorial:
1265:(permalink)
1226:Herostratus
1130:Herostratus
1038:Unsubscribe
1034:Single-page
956:Steve Quinn
941:Steve Quinn
740:ocean water
592:Unsubscribe
588:Single-page
229:Unsubscribe
225:Single-page
136:Unsubscribe
132:Single-page
36:This is an
1531:Articles:
1315:Help with
1199:surprising
1042:EdwardsBot
856:Dear Sir:
613:Dear Sir:
609:Suggestion
596:EdwardsBot
511:Kungfu2187
367:Kungfu2187
313:content...
299:Kungfu2187
233:EdwardsBot
140:EdwardsBot
1590:Heads up!
1539:Members:
1491:The Bugle
1458:Yakushima
1426:WP:FRINGE
1369:Yakushima
1328:Yakushima
1277:this edit
341:and also
319:Thanks.
1576:BrownBot
1572:newsroom
1446:WP:ADHOM
910:O Fenian
766:AzureAnt
479:Returned
1241:Flyer22
1148:WP:BITE
795:Fissile
681:Flyer22
476:Giacomo
39:archive
1454:forced
1430:WP:NEO
1422:it's a
1418:WP:IAR
1410:WP:NEO
883:there.
729:should
501:AK-200
493:AK-200
363:RPG-32
359:RPG-30
355:RPG-28
351:RPG-27
347:RPG-16
339:QBZ-03
335:AK-200
292:QBZ-03
261:AK-200
251:QBZ-03
247:AK-200
1636:Filed
1203:would
939:----
738:" if
709:Cla68
459:Chat
453:Pedro
416:with.
412:that.
397:Chat
391:Pedro
16:<
1697:talk
1683:talk
1668:talk
1649:talk
1626:talk
1608:talk
1580:talk
1568:here
1480:talk
1462:talk
1398:here
1394:here
1373:talk
1365:that
1350:talk
1332:talk
1305:talk
1245:talk
1230:talk
1195:know
1163:talk
1134:talk
1068:Ched
1046:talk
960:talk
945:talk
914:talk
891:talk
871:talk
842:talk
833:not.
823:talk
803:talk
770:talk
713:talk
705:this
685:talk
653:talk
637:talk
600:talk
515:talk
499:For
440:talk
426:talk
371:talk
361:and
337:and
325:talk
303:talk
290:For
249:and
237:talk
144:talk
1645:Abd
1604:Abd
1361:MFC
1175:-->
1061:any
381:ANI
1699:)
1685:)
1670:)
1651:)
1628:)
1610:)
1582:)
1574:.
1482:)
1464:)
1375:)
1352:)
1334:)
1247:)
1232:)
1165:)
1136:)
1074:?
1071::
1048:)
1040:·
1036:·
1032:·
962:)
947:)
916:)
893:)
873:)
844:)
825:)
805:)
772:)
715:)
687:)
655:)
639:)
602:)
594:·
590:·
586:·
517:)
509:--
456::
442:)
428:)
394::
373:)
357:,
353:,
349:,
345:,
327:)
305:)
297:--
294:.
263:.
239:)
231:·
227:·
223:·
146:)
138:·
134:·
130:·
1695:(
1681:(
1666:(
1647:(
1624:(
1606:(
1578:(
1478:(
1460:(
1371:(
1348:(
1330:(
1307:)
1303:(
1243:(
1228:(
1161:(
1132:(
1044:(
958:(
943:(
912:(
840:(
821:(
801:(
768:(
746:"
711:(
683:(
651:(
598:(
513:(
438:(
424:(
369:(
323:(
301:(
235:(
142:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.