1039:
collaboration as being an option anymore. Since the WPSheff has no authority, no power, no right to make decisions, there is little need for it. Furthermore since I believe we disagree and have taken different paths, as two founding members of the project I see not how we could collaborate effectively within the WP structure. finally, the first step to take a
Wikipedian's actions is good faith, when harm is felt, the next step is bad faith, the reaso I do not wish to collaborate in any way with Jhamez and his Infobox friends, I do not see a single good thing arising from their actions. Good faith is good for dumping on talk pages as a warning, after weeks of discussions it is entirely natural to act upon the behaviour of others, don't be so diplomatic Jeremy, take a stance, I have and that is the eradication of the template. Quote:
937:
but imposing and borderline rude. My aggassement was not generated by your use of Jhamez' map, but by the use of the template, although I do have reservations on the map itself. You played with it on your userspace; fine. Its implementation is what I believe is anti WPsheffield, the core of what the members believed in is tossed aside and ignored. Now Jhamez is on another whim and implenting the map and furthe rmodifications to this pirate template upon all of South
Yorkshire? Since the values of the WPsheffield seem to have changed while mine haven't, I do not see why I should continue collaborating.
972:. There is something to be said for pragmatism—I don't think that the infobox is perfect but it is what we have; consensus among other Wikipedians appears to be to use it, so the most pragmatic approach is to try to make it better. My opinion is that the SY map makes it better for the likes of the Treeton article. Collaboration is about give and take—sometimes things go your way sometimes they don't. The test of anyone's character is how they react when things don't go their way—I choose conceding graciously, picking myself up and carrying on over taking my ball and going home. —
1014:
me how?". You should also note that I stated that I was perfectly happy for
Sheffield districts to have no infobox. But, given that some did previously have one, I have been playing around with various options—nothing with any intent of going 'live' with anything, just looking to see if I can find something that I like better than the currently preferred 'no map or infobox' solution. I am perfectly entitled to do this in my own sandbox, I am also perfectly entitled to ask other users for help if I come across a particular problem in one of the variants that I try. —
1979:
1963:
1914:
1898:
661:
645:
607:
591:
192:
sometimes guilty of ignoring this advice). So here is another suggestion: as I am quite close to this situation the opinion of another admin may have more weight with Lewis than my opinion. Admins are not police, and are supposed to avoid mediating in disputes, but you may find another admin who is prepared to look at specific examples and see if another warning, or even a block is appropriate. Within
Wikiproject:Sheffield Warofdreams is also an admin, and other admins can be found at
761:
this filth in peace without me ruining your work towards world domination of infobox paradise. I have voiced my hatred of infoboxes in the past and see that I have little weight in the decisions made by the project I once proposed for creation, I give my place in project to Pit-Yacker, Jhamez and MRSC who are making such a better job than me to make
Knowledge a boring and uniform contentless collection of nothingness. Thanks for the great help in this time. Cheers,
157:), the secret is just to ignore them. You may also find that it is better if you try to avoid entering into discussions with Lewis for a while—other editors will eventually spot and correct copyright problems or poor editing (even if it sometimes takes longer than you would like). You will remember that some of the early encounters between you and I were not exactly amicable, but I hope that you will agree that we are able to work well together now. —
1228:, I didn't actually create or even conceptualise the UK infobox; I've just had a hand in a few of the straw polls and drawn up some maps that I thought would be right steps forwards. I suppose consensus would have to be obtained to re-adopt a local template, though I suspect it could face opposition, as, as honourable this version may be, Cornish, Northern Irish and Scottish nationalists may do the same to refork politial adgendas. Your thoughts?
146:
edit as a direct personal attack on you, even if it does show that he misunderstands the purpose of talk pages. As for more general relations between you and Lewis, I watch both of your talk pages, so I am aware that the two of you don't get along. However, I think that I would be abusing my admin powers if I were to intervene in any stronger way than I have already (although I would use blocks if I saw any more direct personal attacks).
1871:
providing an opportunity for stargazers to stream ambient music while they surf. It's simply a hobby of mine, and whatsmore, it inspires me to write more music. I'm certainly not selling anything. Have a look at the site if you like, and let me know. The reason the links turned up on another IP was because i asked my brother to put the links up for me, as they kept getting deleted on my end.
555:. But this interwiki is total wrong. In german wikipedia this interwiki Hanga (Sprache) means an article for an african language and in english wikipedia this article is part of hindu history. So can there be more than only a mistake...maybe a chaotic bot or a vandal bot. I write you, because i just elect an admin from the adminlist.
2043:) and get the majority of the landmarks linked. Based on my cursory count we need to write 12 more articles to get to a majority. It would be great if you might be able to assist by creating a couple stubs to assist in this effort. Here are some of the stubs that were created during last week’s efforts:
1177:)? What if a ward does not correlate with a district or settlement and vice-versa? What about international context? Does one assume all dial and postal codes in Sheffield are the same? Does everybody share a Sheffield wide identity? Is this approach useful for children, the impaired and foreign readers?
352:
Now, regarding the image deletion: I had thought I'd changed google maps enough, but clearly not (a misunderstanding of policy of my part) - and I was willing to accept the image deletion, hence I did not repspond (I had and have not seen the new product by the way. By all means, use it if you feel
123:
Hi Jeremy, I still can't find a sensible place to report Lewis as he has once more chosen to use profanity to express himself. This is not the first, nor the second time this has happened. I am asking you to look into this seriously so as to not be the recipient of such language from the user. I have
1690:
From a
Sheffield point of view, I'd be particularly keen to see Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire; from a national point of view, the most populous counties such as Kent, Essex and Hampshire might be most appreciated (and Essex in particular has some tricky coastline to draw). I wonder whether there
1552:
solely to illustrate the audio recording in question, on the
English-language Knowledge, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Knowledge or elsewhere, may be copyright
964:
Values? When we created WP:SHEFF the only mission statement written was "Some
Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to Sheffield... it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians." The only value that I see there is to
936:
I am annoyed at you and the UK Infobox gang for implementing their template. While you see no place for the template in
Sheffield districts articles I see no place for it anywhere, even on Treeton where I haven't contributed. Since the beginning of their project their contributions have been nothing
760:
Dear Jeremy, after a year and a half of great work together, it is now time to say goodbye to you and the project. I do not like the direction
Knowledge and its members are taking and do not wish to continue on the course adding filth to articles. It is now time to let you and your friends implement
225:
thing... There's NPA, Profanity help page, but nothing I can find to report and have a case assessed. I usually turn to you because I know you, but do not expect you to take action since it would incredibly one sided. The situation as it is is ridiculous, Lewis basically insults me once every couple
145:
Hi Greg. Whilst it is clearly preferable for people to engage in mature and intelligent discussion, there is (so far as I am aware) no explicit ban on the use of profanity on Knowledge talk pages. So there is not much that I can do about the language that you point to above. I don't perceive Lewis's
1810:
I added a link to a website that has over 100 pictures of the building's site, renders, people, previous versions. This is the most extensibale collection of pictures there is on the internet having to do with the Chicago Spire. Also, it has links to just about every newspaper article ever written.
1013:
It's called seeking the middle ground! Exactly what in that message that I left for Jhamez leads you to any other conclusions? You are seeing attacks where none exist. I can summarise the message for you; it says "Infobox A was deleted supposedly because Infobox B could do the same job, please show
703:
page that made the speculative claim that Porky looked a lot like the pig from Piggly Wiggly, which appeared to be true, but I wanted to see which one came first, so I went from the Piggly Wiggly article to Piggly Wiggly's own website and realized that nearly the entire wikipedia article was lifted
1870:
I have since then found out that i'm not allowed to do this. I understand that you don't want spam, and I wholeheartedly accept this. However, the site that I am linking to is simply a stream of space/ambient music. It is completely free, and I have no advertising on them whatsoever. I'm simply
1792:
I was wondering why the link to Chicago Life was taken off the Center for Neighborhood Technology. This was an interview with The Center for Neighborhood Technology. This entry barely has anything on it and this interview definitely qualifies as important and relevant information about the center.
1439:
is leading the way in making some (positive) changes to the UK Wiki structing. He has my support, and I'll certainly be more than happy to contact the various WikiProjects to pass comment or raise their objections. I'm rather excited that at last some progress is being made to really improve these
417:
the time before... No one personnally attacked but, only warning messages concerning your behaviour, not you, were left by myself. Warning you of your beaking of the rules does usually grant you a free linking to WP:Help whilst not passing by Go. I'll respond condescentely every time you choose to
348:
May I first of all say that the response above by Pc1dmn are more in keeping with the kind I expect here. Witty, good-natured and he/she does not immediately assuming he/she is being attacked. May I ask why yet again you respond to myself in this way Captain? You catch more bees with honey than
1623:
I'll upload it upon your file name, but if you have any objections, you can revert of course. I've noticed though that the map appears to miss rivers and water bodies out. Do you know if there are any major ones that ought to be included? - I use the exact blue found on the UK map for the sea and
865:
is the implementation of the infobox. Regardless of Treeton being in Sheffield or not, I do not approve of this template's existence, let alone its implementation, regardless of the articles it is in. I have put too much time into Knowledge to be happy with the ruining of articles by this pityful
408:
Avoiding double spacing after a full stop, I'll point out that this chain of messages was initiated following your outrageous behaviour Lewsskinner. The image deletion was done according to procedure and after upload of copyrighted media. No one assumed anything more than what was written and the
100:
Hi, As I'm a new here, I wonder whether the images from the Internet I upload should be delete by wiki administrators unless I indicate the license and the source of the image ,but I really can't find the information of the some images, I just want to share the beautiful images with wiki members,
718:
OK, I took a somewhat toned-down approach. I removed the "unreferenced" tag, which is obviously not true, and in the link to the Piggly Wiggly site I pointed out that that is the source for most of the article's history section, if not the whole thing. If you really want to encourage laziness in
1674:
Congratulations; your great work on this article has been recognised as it has become featured. I'm still planning significant changes in line with my objections during the RfA, but want to wait until I have sufficiently strong references that it will stand up to the excellent standard of the
1417:
Regardless, I think it's great you've pooled together a large body of research for the article. Some of these Sheffield related articles are superb. I'm also keen on your suggestions at the infobox UK place talk page with regards to WikiProjects - it would be great to revitalise some of these.
1729:
Great work again. I wonder if you could look at Godalming on the map? It looks like rather too much of it is shown over the border in Guildford borough. Meanwhile, Ash, Ash Vale and Mytchett could perhaps be shown as part of the Farnham-Aldershot-Camberley conurbation, to emphasise that it
191:
I feel bad for passing the buck so to speak, however, I feel uncomfortable mediating between you and Lewis because you both edit pages that I frequently edit and admins are encouraged not to use admin powers in disputes related to articles that they themselves are editors of (I know that I am
1091:
With regards to the traditional counties folk, well, the UK geography WikiProject guidelines as well as the British counties Naming conventions insist we use the contemporary county system for several reasons - (legal literature, approach taken by other encyclopedias, primary sources, local
1038:
You're being defensive and trying to justify yourself, I haven't yet said I disagreed with tests in your sandbox, there is no need to be territorial. This thread was intended to inform you of my actions, I'm not seeking your advice, our disagreements have reached a point where i cannot see
1730:
effectively extends into Surrey here, too. A couple of minor things: the inclusion of the Mole might help location in the middle of the county, and I wonder if one or both of the big reservoirs up near the Thames at Molesey would be big enough to show? Keep up the good work,
1245:
I think the only option is to put it to a straw poll. Though, I think the changes you suggest would broadly reinvent the Sheffield place infobox which was deleted, and thus I suspect the consensus would be sweeping to make use of the UK wide infobox to move articles forwards.
1549:"This image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the album or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers
1846:. Unfortunately the material which I deleted has been put back by another IP. It may be a case of sockpuppeting but I don't have the means to prove this, and this time I can't delete it without breaching 3RR myself. Plase take any action that you consider to be appropriate.
303:(so that JeremyA sees this) Pc1dmn and I were certain not arguying, we came up with a new product (an image, now uploaded to the Commons). This petition had the sole reason of existing because of your repeated use of swearing and profanity. This petition does bare the title
2125:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1215:(please forgive my Greater Manchester knowledge bias)? - in these, warding, grid references, postal towns and codes are all different, and giving a nationwide-consistent breakdown of services and land-division for each, despite them forming part of the same city-region.
166:
Cheers for the pointers. Yes we weren't best of friends at first, but I don't think we went the way of colourful language ;) It's just getting boring, we must be on the third, maybe fourth instance if this happening, and I've sen contributors get vasectomy for less :D
1509:
was the original architect for the infobox, though his involvement has reduced with each passing week. I'm keen to get this infobox rolled out across the UK so the collective of editors can move on to other possible projects, such as the ones we've discussed.
1092:
government literature, European guidlines, contemporary mapping, usefulness to readers etc) - the consensus has been formed in the conventions already and they shouldn't be hijacking the article in that way. Also, every article I've seen about a settlement in
1453:
With regards to your tests, I'm afraid that that level of syntax is beyond my editting capabilities (which is incredibly frustrating to me and I'm keen on producing infoboxes). I'm of little help for that kind of work, so probably best to raise this at the
1534:, it states that the "image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the album or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use..."
899:
90% the author of (one that you have never edited) so that I could see what it would look like; all the while stating that, as it stands, I see no place for the UK infobox template in Sheffield district articles. Like I said, I find that strange.
268:
I would like to ask the Captain why he seems to think that every edit I make is an insult to him, but it usually either deteriorates into an arguement or he ignores me. Indeed, he has ignored my previous sensible requests and suggestions.
1814:
It's the loss of the community by not allowing this link. I'm sure people would enjoy it and it would further the spread of information. Your loss. It can get enough exposure elee where, but is still a diservice to what wikipedia is about.
2034:
I have finally had a chance to take a tally on last week’s stubification effort. Based on my manual count we now have 109 bluelinks on a total of 241 landmarks. Preliminary indications were that for our article to be successful at
965:
provide a place to help multiple authors better collaborate on a given set of articles. Regardless of anyones feelings about the map, how is allowing everyone to see what the map looks like in action not helping that collaboration?
1331:
That's fantastic! I'm more than happy to see these maps used in this way (particularly for ancient/alternative geographic reference frames placed against modern boundaries), and I'm really impressed with this Hallamshire version.
992:
in mind, I don't see how we can agree Jeremy. There has been no give and take here, just take-take-take, I'd like to take sometimes you know. Regardless of the map being lisible, it does not need the template for it to feature.
1627:
I have no objections to any help with drawing maps up; quite the contrary! I would be more than happy to have multiple-user support. I am making the Merseyside map currently, and after that I'm not entirely sure.
806:. Given your claims at supporting my position, I find your contributions strange, if not contradictory. I am one faced, I said I hate the template, I simply do... I've worked with you all these months, if our
898:
OK, so you are pissed off at me because I took a map that someone else had made, calibrated it, played with it in my own user space, and then swapped it in place of a UK map in an article that I am : -->
197:
1096:, states South Yorkshire within the first few words - I don't see why Sheffield should be treated unlike any other, the north of England has no legal status or clearly defined geographic frame.
1088:
they form a local government district at the same time. There was a plan to convert them all, but it seems some cities have been overlooked - I'll see what I can do for Leeds and other places.
1620:
I've been able to save the file and swap the colours of the motorways to RGB Blue (R:0, G:0, B:255), and then dulled the parts outside of Derbyshire using the eraser tool at 27% Opacity.
704:
directly from the Piggly Wiggly site. In addition to finding no new information, I backed up, and into the irony that some idiot had put an "unreferenced" tag on the page. PIGGLY WIGGLY
1556:
To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Knowledge:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information."
1503:
I intend to create a Merseyside county map next, then possibly address some of the issues being raised at the Infobox UK place talk page with regards to South-South Yorkshire.
1500:
Your response to aid with the map calibrations was unbelievebly fast! Thank you so much! Your tests appear to be wholly accurate, and already suitable for a mainspace upload!
81:
463:
572:
Thanks, but I was hoping for wider revision than just the addressing of the examples I listed. Perhaps you can find a good copy-editor who's unfamiliar with the topic.
778:
Given that I have actually supported your position in relation to the use of the UK place infobox in articles on Sheffield districts I find your comments strange. —
124:
for a long time thrived to apply to rules and when such rules are repeatedly broken I have repeatedly reported them, the latest wave of ill-language happened here:
2097:
2004:
459:
543:
226:
of weeks, and there's no recourse I can follow to prevent him from doing so. Congrats to Warofdreams for his Adminship, last time I checked, he wasn't one.
2130:
153:. But at the moment I suggest that you try not to rise to the bait—as an admin I have had much worse personal attacks made against me (take a look at the
139:
1797:
1361:(I may do this over the weekend), though if you need a hand with these, or know of a request for a simillar kind of map, please feel free to contact me.
862:
Treeton is near Sheffield, our discussions in the past have led us to maintain articles south Yorkshire-wide. The map is made to feature in the infobox,
471:
523:
Hi, did you ever get it sorted out with wowturkey images or do you still need help with translation of the policy of the site? Let me know if you do. --
1767:
Hi there JeremyA/Archive08. I see you have edited the above article, I'd like to invite you to a poll on the inclusion or not of the coordinates box,
559:
533:
I replied on the WPTR page. If the logo is there, the images are available for use. If the logo is removed, they ask for requesting permission etc. --
433:
387:
277:
104:
2064:
1950:
537:
2076:
1754:
1700:
1054:
1025:
1004:
948:
911:
877:
845:
821:
789:
556:
447:
237:
204:
178:
161:
1800:
1312:
Thanks for the note; I hadn't realised that there was an ongoing discussion on this; I'll leave off until a consensus is reached on what to do.
1164:
theory, I could see that adopting that approach may raise a few points of conflict, if not in Sheffield, then certainly elsewhere in the UK.....
330:
1173:
Specifically; When does a district become a settlement and vice-versa? What literature is there that verifies a place is a suburb of another (
125:
1712:
745:
736:
723:
290:
2102:
1661:
1645:
1462:
1422:
1382:
1278:
1250:
1232:
1144:
1830:
810:
diverge, there is little point in continuing to work together. I've also received little reaction on your side concerning the Commons...
1069:
Hi! Thanks for the contact! And... thanks for working with the South Yorkshire graphic to make the dynamic map, I really appreciate it.
2137:
1944:
1784:
804:
1395:. It makes me suspect that it had an administrative role (possibly ecclesiastic?), though it's just my personal speculation of course.
1186:
It also misses out other outputs which may be more useful locally, such as OS grid reference, population total and population density.
1335:
I have released all my maps to the public domain, so its no problem at all, though it is nice for the contact of courtesy of course.
286:
Petty? How dare you sir ... my seconds + any available Mysterons will be outside Sheff Med School at dawn tomorrow. Ars longa, etc.
1940:
1719:
633:
1321:
319:)' symbolising the repitition of this petition thus the repetition of your unwiki-like behaviour which is to this date unchanged.
1818:
1684:
1589:
1479:
Hello Jeremy, The limitation of the Lat./ Long. item in the template is that it doesn't allow a scale factor. (see discussion at
802:
687:
455:
1885:(inserted later) Am I meant to wait for a reply? I'm not sure what the procedure is. my email is: mirkoruckels@iprimus.com.au
2122:
2014:
1302:
467:
1368:
527:
513:
2044:
2028:
1779:
1605:
1517:
800:
196:. I would recommend Splash, but he appears to have not edited much recently. There is also a sparsely populated category of
2048:
39:
1822:
1805:
1635:
772:
732:
the history page and point out explicitly that this is where it comes from. That would cover all the bases, presumably.
728:
Thank you for fixing. Unfortunately, that returns the "unreferenced" tag to the page. A compromise approach would be to
712:
2089:
1996:
1924:
1905:
1271:
678:
617:
598:
316:
116:
2075:
has a footnote to a reference that gives you enough info to create a stub. If you create a new stub please add it to
1850:
1675:
current text. On a different topic, the Derbyshire map looks fantastic; are you planning maps of any other counties?
422:
in supermarionation. Now I believe we are taking JeremyA's talk page hostable with this banter so I leave it at this.
2126:
2118:
2009:
990:
502:
253:
May I explain that the responses in question were not insulting to any one person. Profanity, yes, but it was on my
576:
418:
use profanity as a means of communications, for your eyes only, the new product I uploaded can be seen demonstrated
2093:
2000:
1927:, but did not vote. Thank you for your help! Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. This week
1739:
1706:
1100:
682:
620:, but did not vote. Thank you for your help! Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. This week
193:
1123:
have a section there....... (sorry you've posted there already(!)). I'll use this approach on the other maps. The
2121:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
1487:
983:
1601:
1120:
1107:
93:
1970:
1307:
1290:
652:
149:
I don't think that it has gone this far yet, but you might want to consider some of the options described at
1378:? I've requested that these ancient county divisions get an infobox, as many are poping up and/or maturing.
1669:
1326:
150:
1195:
To try to sell the UK infobox back to yourself, how about it's use in the small disticts/suburbs/wards of
1936:
629:
581:
70:
63:
419:
56:
2107:
1562:
1492:
1711:
I notice that you've been working on one or two of these. I've set up a progress and "to do" table at
2040:
1049:
999:
943:
872:
816:
767:
428:
325:
232:
173:
134:
1978:
1962:
1913:
1897:
1540:
I want to upload an image of a cover of an audio recording... so what license do I have to choose?
1296:
660:
644:
606:
590:
2134:
1513:
Once again, thanks for the map settings; I'm sure thousands of readers will be eternally greatful.
562:
518:
478:
1768:
863:
798:
2052:
1826:
1760:
1405:
2085:
2068:
1992:
1612:
1347:
1212:
674:
498:
310:
110:
1106:
Yes, unitary, metropolitan and non-metropolitan districts are supposed to use this template -
1750:
1735:
1696:
1680:
1317:
719:
others, I could copy their history onto the talk page and save someone a mouse click or two.
692:
567:
494:
1072:
With regards to the infobox, in short, yes! UK cities are meant to use the modern infobox (
1044:
994:
938:
867:
811:
762:
423:
320:
258:
227:
168:
129:
31:
This archive page covers approximately the dates between 22 February 2007 and 25 May 2007.
8:
1631:
Thanks again however, to say there were no instructions, you've mangaged this with ease.
1160:
concerns with it personally, particularly if an article is only a stub. Though, applying
154:
1570:
Can you just tell me what I have to choose (license) when I am ready to upload my file?
452:
Why did you destroy Gleam the hedgehog? My entire idea for my world was focused on him.
2114:
2108:
1837:
1641:
Ah, your version is in the Knowledge Commons. I'll add my version to Knowledge, sorry.
1597:
486:
250:
Hi there, I have just stumbled across this in looking for you regarding something else.
87:
1480:
379:, but if you must, use the article's talk page, not mine, that was all I was syaing.
2080:
2056:
2031:
drive for it or (3) you nominated an article to be the CHICOTW in the last few days.
2024:
1987:
1772:
1161:
1064:
1020:
978:
906:
840:
784:
669:
534:
524:
506:
380:
363:
306:
270:
106:
51:
35:
17:
2072:
2060:
2020:
1928:
1746:
1731:
1692:
1676:
1580:
So, if what I want to do has already done, like the link above, why can't I do it?
1313:
1137:
479:
373:"i suggest you polish your understanding of Knowledge policies before intervening"
1888:
1847:
1761:
1691:
would be support for a map of the Western Isles or other Scottish island groups?
1472:
1225:
1119:
A description of how you worked out the South Yorkshire settings would be great!
1093:
1043:, don't take it word for word, it's just a quote. I could quote the Doors too...
755:
621:
1867:
I've been putting links to my site from some of the astronomy or ambient sites.
1522:
1724:
1716:
1436:
1354:
742:
733:
720:
709:
563:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anga&diff=95286020&oldid=92890904
2059:. Among the articles still redlinked are 2 buildings on this week’s CHICOTW,
489:
page. I'd like to point you towards the fact that he's made similar edits to
101:
that's it. And hope you can take a little time to give me a reply, Thanks.
2036:
1658:
1642:
1632:
1593:
1514:
1484:
1459:
1419:
1379:
1365:
1299:
1275:
1247:
1229:
1204:
1174:
1141:
1124:
1097:
693:
376:
83:
1343:
1338:
The map you've produced is very simillar to the amended maps I've made for
1015:
973:
901:
835:
779:
490:
201:
158:
46:
1811:
These article are searchable. This also make this website one of a kind.
1617:
Hi! The map is truly outstanding! You've replicated the style with ease!
1339:
545:
287:
262:
1408:; so it clearly wasn't a parish, at least at that map's production time.
1843:
1358:
1196:
1111:
1081:
1073:
834:
1) Treeton is not a district of Sheffield 2) a map is not an infobox. —
573:
1546:
What do I have to do to get this message in my uploaded cover image?
361:. The place for a discussion of the kind you to were having would be
1543:
What did that uploader do to upload the same thing I want to upload?
1506:
1375:
1208:
1077:
866:
template, hence my resignation from all collaborative work projects.
700:
126:
User_talk:Lewisskinner#Speedy_deletion_of_Image:Bramall_Lane_plan.JPG
1481:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Template_talk:Infobox_UK_place#coor_template
1274:
where I have suggested a possible solution for the whole of the UK?
968:
With respect to the infobox on articles unrelated to Sheffield, say
1657:
Thank you so much! This infobox project is really taking off here!
1537:
If that uploader could upload that image, why can't I do the same?
969:
1574:
1573:
It's just an image of a cover of a audio recording, like this one
1531:
27:
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
2077:
Knowledge:WikiProject_Chicago#Newly_Created_Chicago_Related_Pages
1473:
1200:
1136:
I've also left some comment at the Sheffield talk page regarding
369:"I suppose it was predictable that the Mysterons would intervene"
1874:
1128:
38:, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See
1583:
What license do I have to choose? Please tell me. Just that!
367:. My talk page is not for personal attacks on users such as
223:
I've been insulted and I want a user to be disciplined/warned
1859:
1654:
1553:
infringement. See Knowledge:Fair use for more information.
552:
2027:(2) edited it or created a stub last week when we had the
200:, of whom Celestianpower is the name I recognise most. —
1943:
to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list. See
1713:
Template talk:Infobox UK place/maps#English County Maps
1156:
That's an interesting infobox if I'm honest. I have no
2039:
we would need to eventually rename it (something like
1458:, UK infobox place talk page. < I jest of course.
1041:
Our revenge will be sloooow but nonetheless effective
501:
just judging by his talk page - more looking at his
1530:If you see the licensing of the image on this page
2065:Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton Office and Studio
1715:. Please add any that you are working on. Thanks
1270:Sorry to drop in, but could I direct you both to
636:to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
1575:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:ATB-SevenYears.jpg
1532:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:ATB-SevenYears.jpg
2019:I am writing you because you either (1) edited
485:I saw you edit vandalism from this user on the
221:In this case, where the hell are the pages for
1586:Thanks again for your time and your patience.
265:not to use my talk page for a petty argument.
257:user talk page! All I meant was to ask both
2079:so that we can keep track of the progress.
1892:
1624:generally use Goggle Earth as a reference.
1114:. I know there are others around somewhere.
585:
1920:
699:Here's the deal: I saw a reference on the
613:
1935:towards the quality level of a Knowledge
628:towards the quality level of a Knowledge
1745:That looks spot on to me, now. thanks,
1559:Thanks for your time and your patience.
82:All images I uploaded have been deleted,
448:Why did you destroy Gleam the hedgehog?
14:
1272:Template talk:Infobox UK place#Suburbs
551:I found this interwiki in the article
2098:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
2045:Black Metropolis-Bronzeville District
2005:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM
1140:; it may be of interest to yourself.
2049:Historic Michigan Boulevard District
1131:) is one in desperate need of a fix!
708:THE REFERENCE!!! Now do you get it?
40:Knowledge:How to archive a talk page
741:Just got your message. Understood.
23:
1842:Hi, thank you for your support re
1785:Center for Neighborhood Technology
1295:Hello Jeremy, What do you think -
544:Please check the interwiki Bot of
24:
2148:
1906:Chicago Collaboration of the Week
599:Chicago Collaboration of the Week
2071:). Recall that each redlink on
1977:
1961:
1912:
1896:
1391:It is curious that it is Hallam-
1353:I still intend to make maps for
659:
643:
605:
589:
194:Knowledge:List of administrators
1406:Parishes of the West Riding map
1364:Thanks again, kindest regards,
413:said it all really, so did the
2015:Chicago Landmark Stubification
1923:Last week you helped edit the
1404:It also doesn't appear on the
1121:Template_talk:Infobox UK place
1108:Metropolitan Borough of Oldham
616:Last week you helped edit the
13:
1:
1971:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago
653:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago
238:19:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
205:00:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
179:23:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
162:22:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
140:20:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
2023:5 weeks ago when it was the
1875:http://www.deepspacehome.com
151:Knowledge:Resolving disputes
7:
1976:
1911:
1806:Chicago Spire external link
1774:
658:
604:
508:
382:
272:
71:User talk:JeremyA/Archive09
64:User talk:JeremyA/Archive07
57:22:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
10:
2153:
2129:. Reviewers' concerns are
1960:
1895:
1831:13:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1801:19:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
1780:02:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
1755:02:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
1740:00:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
1720:13:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
1701:00:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
1685:23:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
1662:22:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
1646:11:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
1636:11:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
1606:02:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1518:00:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1350:articles, amongst others.
1279:23:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1251:23:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1233:22:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1145:19:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1101:19:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1055:09:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
1026:22:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
1005:22:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
984:20:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
949:20:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
912:19:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
878:19:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
846:19:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
822:19:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
790:19:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
773:17:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
746:00:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
737:18:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
724:23:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
713:23:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
688:00:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
642:
588:
577:07:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
560:23:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
357:, (as I stated), this was
2117:has been nominated for a
2041:List of Chicago Landmarks
1488:16:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
1463:00:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
1423:22:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
1383:00:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
1369:00:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
1322:16:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1303:16:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
538:12:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
528:22:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
514:02:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
472:02:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
434:17:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
388:15:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
331:10:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
291:09:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
278:03:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2138:01:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
2103:15:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
2010:00:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
1851:11:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
1707:UK Infobox - county maps
1374:--PS. Was Hallamshire a
2119:featured article review
2053:Arthur H. Compton House
155:history of my user page
128:, please sort him out.
62:Previous archive page:
1933:Please help improve it
1348:London postal district
1213:Manchester City Centre
626:Please help improve it
499:Manchester United F.C.
2069:Woman's Athletic Club
1821:comment was added by
1796:Thanks for the help.
1592:comment was added by
1308:Infoboxes for suburbs
1291:Satellite photos etc.
495:Sheffield United F.C.
458:comment was added by
1670:History of Sheffield
1327:Derivative of SY map
34:Post replies to the
2135:Resurgent insurgent
1523:Uploading a file...
582:CHICOTW New Nominee
69:Next archive page:
2115:Spring Heeled Jack
2109:Spring Heeled Jack
1974:
1956:
1909:
1563:Re: Uploading file
1493:West Yorkshire map
656:
638:
602:
487:Middlesbrough F.C.
353:it is superior!)
2101:
2057:One North LaSalle
2008:
1985:
1984:
1968:
1931:has been chosen.
1921:
1903:
1834:
1609:
1456:main UK geography
1376:Wapentake/Hundred
1162:critical thinking
1051:and the Mysterons
1024:
1001:and the Mysterons
982:
945:and the Mysterons
910:
874:and the Mysterons
844:
818:and the Mysterons
788:
769:and the Mysterons
686:
667:
666:
650:
624:has been chosen.
614:
596:
475:
430:and the Mysterons
364:Talk:Bramall_Lane
327:and the Mysterons
234:and the Mysterons
175:and the Mysterons
136:and the Mysterons
55:
18:User talk:JeremyA
2144:
2123:featured quality
2083:
2073:Chicago Landmark
2061:Magnificent Mile
2021:Chicago Landmark
1990:
1981:
1965:
1937:featured article
1929:Magnificent Mile
1916:
1900:
1893:
1816:
1776:
1587:
1483:). Cheers,
1018:
976:
904:
838:
782:
672:
663:
647:
630:featured article
609:
593:
586:
519:wowturkey images
510:
480:user:Bluedevil04
460:Gleamthehedgehog
453:
384:
359:my own talk page
274:
49:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2112:
2017:
1955:
1891:
1862:
1840:
1817:—The preceding
1808:
1787:
1765:
1762:Tinsley Viaduct
1727:
1709:
1672:
1615:
1588:—The preceding
1565:
1525:
1495:
1477:
1329:
1310:
1293:
1094:South Yorkshire
1067:
1046:Captain Scarlet
996:Captain Scarlet
940:Captain Scarlet
869:Captain Scarlet
813:Captain Scarlet
764:Captain Scarlet
758:
697:
637:
622:The Second City
584:
570:
549:
521:
483:
454:—The preceding
450:
425:Captain Scarlet
322:Captain Scarlet
259:Captain Scarlet
229:Captain Scarlet
170:Captain Scarlet
131:Captain Scarlet
121:
98:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2150:
2111:
2106:
2016:
2013:
1983:
1982:
1975:
1966:
1958:
1957:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1910:
1901:
1890:
1887:
1861:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1839:
1836:
1807:
1804:
1786:
1783:
1764:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1726:
1723:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1649:
1648:
1614:
1613:Derbyshire map
1611:
1564:
1561:
1527:Hello Jeremy:
1524:
1521:
1494:
1491:
1476:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:User:Ddstretch
1435:It seems that
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1386:
1385:
1355:West Yorkshire
1328:
1325:
1309:
1306:
1292:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1260:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1150:
1148:
1147:
1133:
1132:
1116:
1115:
1110:is one, as is
1066:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1008:
1007:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
827:
826:
825:
824:
793:
792:
757:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
696:
691:
665:
664:
657:
648:
640:
639:
615:
611:
610:
603:
594:
583:
580:
569:
566:
548:
542:
541:
540:
520:
517:
482:
477:
449:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
375:, so please.
350:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
296:
295:
294:
293:
281:
280:
266:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
198:English admins
184:
183:
182:
181:
147:
120:
103:
97:
80:
79:
77:
75:
74:
67:
36:main talk page
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2149:
2140:
2139:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2110:
2105:
2104:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2032:
2030:
2029:stubification
2026:
2022:
2012:
2011:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1989:
1980:
1973:
1972:
1967:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1952:
1951:good articles
1946:
1945:past CHICOTWs
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1919:
1915:
1908:
1907:
1902:
1899:
1894:
1886:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1865:
1856:
1853:
1852:
1849:
1845:
1835:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1823:68.152.21.253
1820:
1812:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1794:
1790:
1782:
1781:
1778:
1777:
1770:
1763:
1756:
1753:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1722:
1721:
1718:
1714:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1683:
1682:
1678:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1634:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1618:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1584:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1571:
1568:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1528:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1497:Hello again,
1490:
1489:
1486:
1482:
1475:
1464:
1461:
1457:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1424:
1421:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1407:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1394:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1384:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1362:
1360:
1356:
1351:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1336:
1333:
1324:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1280:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1252:
1249:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1234:
1231:
1227:
1226:Paul Metcalfe
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1205:High Crompton
1202:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:West Midlands
1122:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1056:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1003:
1002:
998:
997:
991:
988:
987:
986:
985:
980:
975:
971:
966:
950:
947:
946:
942:
941:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
913:
908:
903:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
879:
876:
875:
871:
870:
864:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
847:
842:
837:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
823:
820:
819:
815:
814:
809:
805:
803:
801:
799:
797:
796:
795:
794:
791:
786:
781:
777:
776:
775:
774:
771:
770:
766:
765:
747:
744:
740:
739:
738:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
722:
717:
716:
715:
714:
711:
707:
702:
695:
694:Piggly Wiggly
690:
689:
684:
680:
676:
671:
662:
655:
654:
649:
646:
641:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
612:
608:
601:
600:
595:
592:
587:
579:
578:
575:
568:Sheffield FAC
565:
564:
561:
558:
554:
547:
539:
536:
532:
531:
530:
529:
526:
516:
515:
512:
511:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
481:
476:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
435:
432:
431:
427:
426:
421:
416:
412:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
389:
386:
385:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
360:
356:
351:
349:with vinegar.
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
333:
332:
329:
328:
324:
323:
318:
315:
312:
308:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
292:
289:
288:-- roundhouse
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
276:
275:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
248:
239:
236:
235:
231:
230:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
206:
203:
199:
195:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
180:
177:
176:
172:
171:
165:
164:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
138:
137:
133:
132:
127:
118:
115:
112:
108:
102:
95:
92:
89:
85:
78:
72:
68:
65:
61:
60:
59:
58:
53:
48:
43:
41:
37:
32:
29:
28:
19:
2113:
2081:TonyTheTiger
2033:
2018:
1988:TonyTheTiger
1986:
1969:
1948:
1939:. See the
1932:
1925:Chicago COTW
1904:
1884:
1881:
1878:
1873:
1869:
1866:
1863:
1854:
1841:
1813:
1809:
1798:Bobcat hokie
1795:
1791:
1789:Hi JeremyA,
1788:
1773:
1766:
1749:
1734:
1728:
1710:
1695:
1679:
1673:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1619:
1616:
1585:
1582:
1579:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1536:
1529:
1526:
1512:
1505:
1502:
1499:
1496:
1478:
1455:
1392:
1363:
1352:
1344:Salfordshire
1337:
1334:
1330:
1316:
1311:
1294:
1259:
1224:Contrary to
1157:
1149:
1090:
1085:
1071:
1068:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1000:
995:
967:
963:
944:
939:
873:
868:
817:
812:
807:
768:
763:
759:
729:
705:
698:
670:TonyTheTiger
668:
651:
632:. See the
625:
618:Chicago COTW
597:
571:
550:
535:Free smyrnan
525:Free smyrnan
522:
507:
491:Reading F.C.
484:
451:
429:
424:
414:
410:
381:
372:
368:
362:
358:
354:
326:
321:
313:
307:Lewisskinner
304:
271:
254:
233:
228:
222:
174:
169:
135:
130:
122:
113:
107:Lewisskinner
99:
90:
76:
44:
33:
30:
26:
25:
1879:Sincerely,
1775:L.J.Skinner
1747:Warofdreams
1732:Warofdreams
1693:Warofdreams
1677:Warofdreams
1340:Saddleworth
1314:Warofdreams
546:User:STBotD
509:L.J.Skinner
383:L.J.Skinner
305:Once more,
273:L.J.Skinner
105:Once more,
45:Thank you.
2025:WP:CHICOTW
1941:To Do List
1864:Hi Jeremy
1848:Viewfinder
1844:Robin Cook
1838:Robin Cook
1655:Fantastic!
1567:Hi again:
1359:Merseyside
1346:, and the
1197:Hollinwood
1112:Warrington
1082:Birmingham
1074:Manchester
634:To Do List
1949:Note our
1860:deepspace
1717:Richard B
1507:User:MRSC
1440:articles!
1209:Broughton
1138:WP:CITIES
1078:Liverpool
1065:Sheffield
808:interests
743:Wahkeenah
734:Wahkeenah
730:summarize
721:Wahkeenah
710:Wahkeenah
701:Porky Pig
1819:unsigned
1659:Jhamez84
1643:Jhamez84
1633:Jhamez84
1602:contribs
1594:Ronald26
1590:unsigned
1515:Jhamez84
1485:Wikityke
1460:Jhamez84
1420:Jhamez84
1380:Jhamez84
1366:Jhamez84
1300:Wikityke
1298:cheers,
1276:Regan123
1248:Jhamez84
1230:Jhamez84
1142:Jhamez84
1098:Jhamez84
970:Brighton
557:GLGerman
503:contribs
468:contribs
456:unsigned
317:contribs
117:contribs
94:contribs
84:Sum 2101
1889:CHICOTW
1474:Crookes
1201:Ancoats
1016:JeremyA
989:Baring
974:JeremyA
902:JeremyA
836:JeremyA
780:JeremyA
756:Goodbye
505:page.
202:JeremyA
159:JeremyA
2055:&
2037:WP:FLC
1882:Mirko
1725:Surrey
1175:WP:NOR
1129:Dudley
415:F word
411:S word
377:WP:NPA
263:Pc1dmn
47:Jeremy
1393:shire
1158:major
1127:map (
16:<
2131:here
2127:here
2090:cont
2086:talk
1997:cont
1993:talk
1827:talk
1769:here
1751:talk
1736:talk
1697:talk
1681:talk
1598:talk
1357:and
1318:talk
1021:talk
979:talk
907:talk
841:talk
785:talk
679:cont
675:talk
574:Tony
553:Anga
497:and
464:talk
420:here
311:talk
261:and
111:talk
88:talk
52:talk
2094:bio
2001:bio
1771:.
683:bio
371:or
355:But
255:own
42:.)
2133:.
2067:,
2051:,
2047:,
1947:.
1829:)
1604:)
1600:•
1577:.
1342:,
1211:,
1207:,
1203:,
1199:,
1086:if
1084:)
1080:,
1076:,
706:IS
493:,
470:)
466:•
2100:)
2096:/
2092:/
2088:/
2084:(
2063:(
2007:)
2003:/
1999:/
1995:/
1991:(
1953:.
1833:.
1825:(
1608:.
1596:(
1023:)
1019:(
981:)
977:(
909:)
905:(
900:—
843:)
839:(
787:)
783:(
685:)
681:/
677:/
673:(
474:.
462:(
314:·
309:(
119:)
114:·
109:(
96:)
91:·
86:(
73:.
66:.
54:)
50:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.