User talk:Sjakkalle/May and June 2005

2462:, and doing one-or two word edits to build up their "credibility," I guess. But if you look at their contribution lists, it's pretty obvious what the guy is doing. They gang up in VfD on people they/he - sorry - seems to have personal grudges against, and to defend his own articles from others - even if that means deleting them if he can't keep his POV intact, as in Roger Moss. I believe his socks are Spotteddogsdotorg, ConeyCyclone, Melvis, ShureMicGuy, Toasthaven, Tobyvonmeistersinger, and Hohokus. There was a lull in activity for about a week, but the puppets have started up again, I see. You might want to look at my puppet history - 1875:. It just seems to me like someone spends to much time in make-believe land, to write articles about fictional events, people, etc. Now, if it becomes part of "Americana" or something that becomes a common in Classic Liturate, I could see it. Like Robin Hood, or Zoro, King Arthur, The Lone Ranger, these I could accept, but one election from a TV show. A show like the 505:, it appears that it was created by several different anonymous IPs. The list doesn't actually say "page created" for certain edits, however; I'm just guessing from the dates of edits compared to the dates of the four deletions. It appears that the only signed-in accounts were deleting or trimming the page, however. Hope this helps. - 2457:

Not that this is anything you don't already suspect, but I thought I'd mention my findings to you as I'm not sure what to do with them. I don't go hunting for sock puppets, but I sort of fell into this on Roger Moss. I believe that the user originally known as 209(can't remember his last numbers at

723:

Wing Commander was a follow on to Privateer??? I recollect trying to get a copy about the time computer games went all windows or MAC compatible. We still play Privateer on one of our archaic 'boxes' - I keep OS capability and compatibility back (a dozen years) to Windows 3.1 for professional needs.

54:

As for next month, I don't know if I will nominate myself again. I might not think about it until somebody else puts me up there on RFA at a later date. Eventually, I see myself as an admin, especially as the number of articles and users continues to grow. Thanks again and good luck at improving this

2370:

You reverted my external link, without perusing the site properly (the revert happened within 3 minutes of my adding it). The website in question does include the full 1875 factory drawings of a Baldwin 4-4-0, certainly of interest to anyone studying the subject. May I suggest you take a closer look

1283:

to notice at least the very different dates, plus the fact that the first is NAVAL, and the second LAND. This is the area I am actively editing if your new Admin toolbox lets you peak into my activities. Various over enthusiastic and mis-guided mergers have made this more difficult. Note the many

991:

I can't tell from the movie - we aquired that sometime last winter at Walmart's Bargain Bin. Was actually a pretty good story - action, adventure, tense interpersonal relationships, predjudice, religious falderall, and a Love Story (2 - one tragic) around the various M/FM protagonists. I think I'll

967:

ORIGIN, Wing Commander, ORIGIN We Create Worlds, Privateer, Wing Commander Academy, and Wing Commander Armada are registered trademarks of ORIGIN. Secret Missions, Vengeance of the Kilrathi, Heart of the Tiger, and The Price of Freedom are trademarks of Origin Systems, Inc. ORIGIN is a wholly owned

920:

as a policy, among others) but there were legitimate concerns, the second RFC was created. Because GRider refused to respond to either, the matter was taken to the ArbCom, and you can see the findings-of-fact from there. Ironically, the only people who support GRider are fans of school articles, and

622:

I saw the way he was replying to objections of his entirely rediculous assertions so I figured I needed to deal appropriately with him.. (hehe). I think he's either a former member of Jehovah's Witnesses, or a Pentacostal :p, either way if he comes back, I hope he'll have learned from his encounter

606:

Thanks for the note. I think that this user is probably just an overzealous person with some bitter former link to the group Jehovah's Witnesses. Furthermore, I think what you told me is the right way to handle the situation. I spoke up before because I figured you were in the right, and I'll try to

1650:

Thanks. I've asked him, too (just like five others). But really, RFA is a popularity contest and most people that oppose do so for no particular good reason (e.g. "he's an inclusionist" or "he's disagreed with me in the past"). Except, of course, when the nominee is a too inexperienced user. I wish

1241:

but seing that the author was a wikipedian with a long and good history of making plant-stubs I didn't delete it. And rightly so, as it turned out he was just being abit clumsy with the save button as some people are. It's usually a good idea to wait some minutes with the speedy-tagging when it's a

912:

When GRider nominated a dozen Tolkien-related articles, a couple of Tolkien fans got angry and started the first RFC (this also caused a VFD/PC, in which he didn't participate). Also roughly about this time, GRider started nominating random fiction-related articles, e.g. major characters from Harry

896:

At a certain point, he nominated over a dozen Chicago aldermen for deletion ("discuss amongst yourselves"), which promptly spurred a VFD/PC discussion, in which he refused to participate. Then the same thing happened about items from Nintendo games. By this point, many people were so thoroughly fed

888:

GRider started out fine. He was sifting through cat:Bio-stubs, recatting and clearing out the junk. At roughly the same time, I was sifting through special:Deadend pages, doing the same. Between the two of us we were unfortunately responsible for putting stress on VfD, but note that there was a lot

569:

discussion and listed the statements that got approval from most people. I believe it's been a constructive page, and WikiProject Schools has benefitted from the revitalization. Anyway please take a look at it and write on the talk page if you found this acceptable. Also I'd appreciate some help in

50:

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Although the voting period just ended with a 14-8-2 vote, I will admit once and for all that I used it more as an evaluation of myself. Being promoted would have been a plus. I was more interested in who voted, when they voted, who would change their votes and

2089:

I believe the links I was adding i.e. "Jobs in City X" searched over all job sites that may offer jobs in that city was informative to the city pages for Indian cities. I have added them only to the "External Links" sections. If you feel this is not useful, I apologise and will revert the changes.

1900:

Go read my reply. The fact that this is the first vote I've participated in (though you will note numerous other ones I have posted on) is not evidence that I won't go onto participate in many more. This may simply be the first. Nor can the "muppets" motives be known unless you ask. to do that

1194:

As I said back then, I'm really glad you decided to stick around despite our initial run-in :P I have left a final warning on the anon's talk page, I'll block him for a couple hours if he still decides to ignore all warnings. By the way, about the "I need an admin to block", would you accept if I

316:

I am guessing that Far Eastern State University is the same as (or, really, is a misnomer for) FE National U. If I find out more, I'll change the stub accordingly. I am not sure how to merge the two topics into one, or how to find links to both names so that they can be merged. And until I can

904:

Around this point, GRider started notifying people of school articles on VfD, causing a flood of 'keep' votes. This method of vote-stacking was not appreciated by several people. Eventually he created his schoolwatch rather than repeatedly posting to 20+ talk pages. The 'neutral' schoolwatch was

892:

Gradually, GRider's behavior became controversial, because he was marking VfD nominations as minor; usually starting the VfD pages as "what should be done here, discuss amongst yourselves" rather than giving a solid reason for deletion; and most importantly, not responding to his own talk page.

2076:

Would you like to join the animated discussion on the Pakistan's talk page? The current issue is whether "Pakistan is famous for its support of Taliban and 9/11 terrorist" is a suitable sentence to start the article's first paragraph. Your contribution would be much appreciated, as the current

762:

it. The current process lets these puff pieces hang around for five days as rewards for the juvenile effort of posting the piece. Five days for them to elbow their friends and say 'wink, wink'... look what I got away with. If they vanished inside a half-hour, as some of my changes have been

1443:

Yeah, I figured that discussion wouldn't last long. I've seen it somewhere else besides the village pump (I hadn't seen the link you gave) and I was looking for that when I saw the "new message" bar go across my screen...I think it was the talk page of an admin who does a lot of impersonator

987:

So I was right -- WC is 'sequel series to Privateer I and II -- I presume Windows capable plot evolved versions of my DOS Privateer. Did you use a joystick and fight battles like Privateer, or did it evolve into a strategy and Tactics mileau (Like 'Orion', Civilization-in-space type)?

188:

Yeah, I noticed some changes soon after I put the tag on... but I didn't take off the speedy tag because I still feltthe article should have been deleted. However, I'm not going to put the speedy tag back. If you say that the article appears to be sincere now, I'll take your word for it.

1384:

Sweetkisses.net is Jessica Fansite(not my private site) and the purchase in the left column is just the link for those Jessica's Fan to look for Jessica goodies from amazon.com easily.The site itself is not a commercial site,so please tell me why can't I add this link on Jessica's page.

2496:

Yeah, I think in such cases you can just go ahead and undelete. It seems like an honest mistake with respect to the GFDL (and based on the idea that the redir isn't really all that useful). An alternative would have been merging the edit histories, but that's a lot of work. Yours,

2301:) , and rightly so, but I've made some substantive improvements to the article. I don't have any particular attachment to the article or its subject, so if you still feel that it ought to be deleted (not notable, etc.), that's fine by me; just thought I'd let you know. Cheers, 2521:

Looks like I edit conflicted with you and didn't notice. I'm sorry, I'm still getting used to the interface changes--there is a subtle difference but I can't put my finger on it; or possibly there was some kind of synchronization problem. Thanks for telling me about the VfD.

840:

The current process lets these self-masturbatory puff pieces hang around for five days as 'A kind of further reward' (Psycologically) for the juvenile thrill at the minor personal cost of posting the piece. Five days for them to elbow their friends and say: (wink, wink)

947:(I was visiting to see if you'd perhaps answered my Wing Commander Query here as you didn't on my talk page... which only came up as Soundguy99 left me a rather lengthy message because of my email to you and your response. Sigh - new web-cultures are a Bitch!) 1004:

I happened upon the page, and found that you had listed it for deletion. The original content was patent-nonsense, but since it is a real concept I tried to create a real stub for it. Check it out; if you don't like, feel free to replace the speedy tag :-)

634:

Another "thank you" for the information, I get the same feelings from Eyesopen due to the highly combative and confrontational nature of his posts and the caustic language he uses to purposely demean when we are just trying to write an accurate article. --

411:

Since Wow often adds himself to the list after finishing a vandalism spree, I would say that the page is certainly not detering his actions. The page is not really necessary either since the socks could be kept track of by using a template like the one for

317:

confirm, I'm not sure that that would be the right thing to do anyway. However, I found the link to the null article in an article on Vladivostok, which is where FENU is located, and the page below seems to indicate that the two names are interchangeable:

1851:. I just don't see the point of putting fictional plots from TV show and movies. Do you know how many fictional elections there have been over the last 70 years in movies and TV? In fact I am having a hard time wrapping my support around much of anything 51:

when, and the comments I would receive. Hopefully I will correct the main weakness that was raised by those who voted oppose -- that I was too eager to put articles on VFD. Also, I will try to interact more with those Wikipedians who did not vote at all.

1690:, someone's moved your "User has only made two edits, &c" comments to pertain to other votes; you might want to fix them back to the votes you intended them for, as it currently reads as though you're objecting to Kelly Martin and MacGuyverMagic... 1178:

mentions "Adding inappropriate external links for self-promotion", so you're not bound by the 3RR rule in such cases. I have left another message on the anon's talk page, and I'll block him for a while if he continues. By the way, I don't think it's

373:

Well, I just wanted to tell you there IS a page, albeit unfinished, called 'List of Mario Villains'. The reason I don't want to merge into that is because much of the pages have poor information, overblown information or merely false information. --

695:

I changed my vote to neutral because it's no longer written in gibberish. However, the entire article still reads like an advertisement. I am very suspicious of it. Nevertheless, thank you for notifying me regarding the changes that have been

144:

Hey there, Sjakkalle. You seem to have created some stir while taking this article from Speedy deletion to VfD. I don't mean it in a bad way, don't get me wrong. I would just like to suggest that next time you simply removed the tag. ^^' Cheers.

1586:

Oops, I should have put the message in English myself. After all, this is not Norwegian Knowledge. Writing in Norwegian was a way of emphasising my point. Still, it is good to see that I said more or less what I meant! Although I thought that

836:

it within the current guidlines. (Lawyering, I know, but within current guidelines, unless I've missed something.) It would be nice to see this tried for a few days or weeks at least just to see if the impact on Vfd\Today goes as I predict.

490:

or any article related to Jehovan's Witnesses in any form - somehow lines have been crossed. (Also: if you leave a message on somebody's talk page, please sign it, so they can easily respond; I had to hunt your name on my talk-history page) -

155:

For whatever it's worth, any article taken off Speedy must go to VfD, unless the speedy tagging was done as vandalism. You done good. After all, if it's not in violation of the deletion policy, it's going to win a "keep" vote pretty easily.

1891:

Sock Puppets, where!? I am posting here because a friend of mine e-mailed me about this and I wanted to have a say, which as I understand is fine. I'm sure, since I've been told, that others have been asked to express their views too.

106:

Thanks! I've commented on the VfU (ironically, the discussion is over a dozen times longer than the original article). Anyway, yes, the school debate is entirely out of hand. I'm trying to work out a compromise with some others, though.

1617:

Hi Sjakkalle, this is overdue, but I want to thank you for your support vote on my RFA. Thanks to everyone who supported me, I am now an admin, and I have used my powers to further Knowledge. Thank you for giving me this opportunity!

1463:

Yes, attack pages are quite plausibly a form of vandalism - however, this is not actually stated anywhere. Since pages such as "John Doe is a jerk" tend to be speedied, I believe the speedy criteria should be updated to reflect that.

229:

are off project for 24 hours. I have a feeling we're dealing with one at home and three at a school computer lab, which means that we'll be seeing more of them, and, of course, tomorrow more will follow. So it goes, and so go they.

908:

Also, a couple of GRider-clones appeared (G Rider, GRuder, stuff like that) that made random vandalizations and were quickly banned. It later turned out that these were not impersonators, but rather were accounts created by himself.

1141:

I don't think you should be too troubled by Grue's vote on my admin application, I think he only (jokingly) gave "extreme inclusionism" as a reason to support because he disagreed with the people using it as a reason to oppose.

650:

The reason as to why I was using test(1), is because for some reason the Infobox for movies keeps changing. One minute it's grey, next minute it's blue. Any idea on as to why it does this? Contact me on my talk page if you

860:

and disuade copy cats in their circle of friends at least, and the word will get around the web as well in general - even if the lesson is relearned locally by many different people. My time is valuable. How about yours?

905:

created shortly after, since GRider instantly reverted many edits to his schoolwatch (such as 'please do not copy/paste votes'). Also around this point, GRider created his rather offensive user page, which still stands.

2188:

Done. Willmcw wrote that there was no need for a redirect when he merged the contents, and I'm loathe to interfere with that as I trust his judgment, but I won't interfere with whatever you decide to do either. Cheers,

1099:

Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Knowledge. See you around and happy editing.

1673:

So that means I can mark any page for deletion I want and no one is allowed to remove it? Imagine what vandalism someone can do if they mark every page with a vote for deletion! Please give me an answer on this.

1320:

I remember seeing them... but you missed o r dodged the question - did you take them off the referenced page above - the merge forum or whatever its called. That's where I saw it last night. Good Morning! Frank

2385:

Thank you for your support and for making my RfA a more interesting experience; your question was actually a good way for me to show a little more of who I am, and I believe it is helping the process. Cheers!

1848: 1290:)... I need to make some snapshot hardcopies and plan changes now that I'm in possession of good references. Within the month, I'll have the whole complex of articles dealing with Japan on a firm footing), 623:

with me. I'm overjoyed that I am not alone in recognizing his rhetoric for what it is. (I've never replied to a user before (Wikinewbie), is this the appropriate place to post a response to your message?

422:

mentioned on long term alerts, incidently you may want to include Knowledge:Vandalism in progress/Wikipedia is Communism for deletion too. I'll support them for deletion . You may want to bring it upon the

1542:

The claim made in that article is unreferenced and unverifiable and has little to do with the rest of the article. If you insist on placing it there, at least add a reference or evidence of some sort. See

396:

Hi, thanks for the message. I have started a rough version of the first season page. When I am done I will ask for a consensus of style, and will start on season 2, if no one has at that point <: -->

1069:

Thanks for the heads-up; I've altered the VfD page (and the talk page of the article). If you catch similar things in the future feel free to remove my closing comment and replace it with your own.

2458:

the moment) knitted up his little alter egos at the end of May/beginning of June specifically to interfere with VfD's. A couple of them have been rapidly creating stubs (see this recent classic -

796:(Waste of Time). So far as I have discerned in lurking around Vfd the past five days, they are usually of juvenile origination... keeping them around more than the bare mininum is rewarding these 204: 570:

keeping any future VfD discussions on this matter from getting out of hand (I'm not entirely sure how, but we could set a good example by casting concise votes referring to /Arguments). Yours,

386:

Since I was the one who intended on updating this page (and the others), and suggested the Vfd for merge purposes. I have no problem doing the merge, if you have not already started. <: -->

2064:

Just tried your new signature -- I found it inobvious that 'Check' meant talk! SOooooo MINE is better (He says sticking out tounge, then grinning hugely while preparing to duck if necessary).

816:

I wrote this sugestion in an UserTalk: Why the heck are the vanity pages tolerated for inclusion into the general Vfd que? If the behind the scenes 'monitors' would immediately tag such as

848:, it would certainly speed the processing on the Vfd/Today page to a more managable number of far more important votes. It would also hold their satisfaction down considerably, assuming 2126: 2108: 416: 1355:

I agree; they're gone. I suspect that there may be more, and a trawl through the "Bosnia & Herzogovina" stubs category might throw them up; I don't have time at the moment...

1119:! I was pleasantly surprised by the sheer number of supporters (including several people that usually disagree with my opinion). I shall do my best with the proverbial mop. Yours, 75:. I will try to learn from your approach in dealing with newbies and/or anons, I think you handled this one exceptionally well, giving maximal help with minimal possible offence. 1921:. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new 1867:

either, but making up seperate articles for elections, or characters, I don't get. It would be like making up articles about fictional compaines, like a trucking company from

2466:. It is not up-to-date for the last few days, but gives the general picture. Would you care to comment about this matter? It's getting less and less amusing, in spite of 770:

I've evolved the above rant and am posting this version in the debate. Since you're in a position to do something with my 'Lawyering', thought I'd give you a persoal peek:

732:

Yeah, Very sorry about that mis-post. I lost the thread context. YOU should try bifocals on a computer. Not! I'll go get my reading glasses, I need some cafine anyway.

130:? I think we should state the source for the popularity ranking you put in the article (the same query applies to a few other opening articles as well, I think). Thanks-- 1380:

Please do not add commercial links or links of your own private websites to Knowledge. Knowledge is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links.

1778:

with your username signed to the end (though not the signature I've seen you use before). If this really was you; sorry, my mistake. If not, there are problems... :(

375: 617:

Well, if you feel a need to go through RfC, I will support you on it. If Eyesopen continues his extremism, through vandalism or whatever, I think RfC makes sense.

2371:

at the site, and perhaps re-instate the link, or at least a link to the drawings page (even though I discourage linking to sub-pages of the site). Thank you.

554: 509: 171:

No problem, locality stubs are easy: I can't even remember which country this one was in now, I've done four or five this week for roughly the same reason!

2515: 1638:

Hi! thank you for your support for my admin candidacy. I have now been promoted—I hope that you will always feel that I am a responsible administrator.

921:

most of them are unaware of the many other things he did. I find David Gerard's quote very appropriate - "with friends like these, who needs enemies..."

441: 1062: 744:

Why the heck are the vanity pages tolerated for inclusion into the general Vfd que? If the behind the scenes 'monitors' would immediately tag such as

636: 288: 2125:

I would also like you to change your username. "Sjakkalle" are generally disliked on Knowledge as it usually refers to someone who is up to no good.

532: 390: 347:

Don't worry about it. Anons are cowards who get mad when they can't get their way. If you aren't being attacked, you aren't doing a good job. :)

160: 1055: 302: 2403: 1025:

There has been a number of vandals targetting your userpage. I have tried reverting some it, but can you check that the version I reverted to is

476: 2270: 381: 1719: 1712: 1699: 1675: 193: 1771: 1029:

the correct one? Perhaps you should add your userpage to your watchlist. I don't know about you, but I think that vandalism to userpages a

724:

One of the few 'joystick' games I ever mastered and played for any length of time. Getting old sucks --I don't recommend aging to anyone!

502: 495: 487: 400: 313:

Hello, Sjakkalle, thank you for your note to me (as an anonymous user). I wasn't aware of the community aspects of Knowledge before this.

270: 1408: 2399: 1818: 943:

Sorry to interject: "with friends like these, who needs enemies..." is NOT correctly attributed! (Tho' widely used since is sooo Pithy.)

134: 79: 1207: 527: 149: 2106: 1270: 533: 275: 2298: 39: 2343:. I will assume you thought it was being vandalised but in actuality I am the owner of that account and am editing anonymously." 655: 611: 501:

Ah, I see. Well, I've never tried to gather such information before, but looking at the "view and restore deleted pages" page for

1922: 1914: 1516:: Articles here are built on consensus. I was just following policy when I reverted your attempt to evade the protection of the 1509:

So you go right on fellating large multinational corporations that violate all standards of ethics, and censor me all you want.

2406:. Before it is put to a general vote I would like your advise on the wording and intent; could you please take a look? Thanks, 1978:

Congrats, I am glad that you were promoted because it shows that I know how to pick a winner (smile), good luck and take care.

424: 2269:

Thank you for your support for my adminship despite my embarassing ignorance on the interplay of GFDL and redirects. Cheers, -

1843: 284:

has withdrawn his TFD nomination for the {{delete}}-template. Can you remove the tfd notice? I see the template is protected.

1753:

It's bad faith editing, disruptive, and an excellent basis for an RFC, but I'm not quite comfortable calling it vandalism. --

337: 100: 1232: 1734: 1702: 178: 431: 362: 62: 1559:

Takk skal du ha for hjelper meg utnevnelsen. Jeg bodde inne Norge for lenge siden og Norsk oppbacking hjertelig meg. --

447: 89:

If I were you, I'd steer well clear of that debate — but it depends on how much time, stamina, and tolerance you have.

468:

was the only article on the Knowledge that mentioned the concept. Thats why I made a refrence rather than a redirect.

234: 1087:

I tried to fix faith-based community, but I am no theology student, so please review and harpoon if necessary. :- )

897:

up with his behavior that "keep - Grider nominated it" was a common vote. People were beginning to suspect GRider of

1834: 1790: 2206:

I also meant to add that I'm sorry for creating that extra work for you. I should have thought of the GFDL issue.

1174:

Hej Sjakkalle, I didn't so much notice the revert war as accidentally stumble upon it in recent changes...anyway,

1046:

Yeah thanks. I'm used to it by now. What is written can be reverted. What doesnt kill me only makes me stronger.

992:

recommend to the Family Entertainment Committee that we watch it again - don't think Mom has ever seen it. ttfn

127: 2463: 1996:

Congratulations upon becoming a target for every paranoid nut on Knowledge... Wield that mop, carry that can.

1572:"Thank you for helping me with the promotion. I lived in Norway long ago, and Norwegian back up is heartening" 1020: 763:

wikified, it would certainly speed the processing on the Vfd/Today page to a more managable number of votes.

481: 261: 67: 2238: 1917:

before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the

683:

What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support.

205:

Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_principles_poll#Straw poll: This set of polls is premature and will only be divisive

183: 2478:

Sorry that I haven't been logged in for a few days. This seems to have been dealt with before I returned.

2068:(I think I need to change the second fabartus to something more suitable tho')!] 21:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2467: 2459: 2324: 1334:

No problemo - us (sometime) space gamers got to stick together. Good Morning again - my Last was really

982: 901:- making mass nominations because he wanted them deleted, but because he wanted to break up VFD somehow. 121: 1284:

references I have added (tho' not necessarily to those two yet (Can't recall - paper memory, that's me!

453: 139: 1852: 1299: 976: 1136: 1910: 1633: 999: 588:

Yeah, I saw it's on VfD. It's no big deal, maybe it was less of a widespread meme than I thought.

2154: 1544: 962: 515: 358:

Forget about these damn anti-chess fanatics! They have no clue, pfft, let them play backgammon.

2077:

discussion seems to be more of a dialog between Ragib and SamTr014 (talk • contribs). Thanks !--

2071: 1909:

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an

824:

go through the Vfd tagging process themselves, or perhaps allow the the Next (another agreeing)

2527: 1956: 1944: 1548: 1214: 1199: 1187: 1073: 881:

Okay, it's can of worms, but since you insist... I'm not sure whom he was a sock of, I believe

601: 524: 1220: 1412: 1276: 1081: 712: 72: 2377:

OK, you put the link back, thanks. If someone else also removes it, I won't complain... ;-)

1375: 739: 244:

I'm honored, thanks for your kind words! However, I'd prefer if you'd wait a week or so for

2210: 2193: 2179: 2169: 2001: 1989: 1830: 1786: 1603: 1563: 1360: 1280: 1061:

Thanks for letting me know. I've responded on the VfU page. In short, I think I goofed.

652: 94: 437:

I wasn't expecting the 'the pages are trophies for vandal hunters' argument. Too bad :( --

8: 2482: 2317: 2245: 2115: 2103:

personal photo albums: is there a discussion page on why? forgive me i'm not a wiki-guru

1805: 1797:

It was not my vote, somebody is impersonating me. The IP who added that note is based in

1744: 1627: 1623: 1578: 1528: 1431: 1393: 1175: 1158: 1037: 520:

Argh, thanks for cleaning up after me! Your friendly neighborhood absent-minded janitor,

17: 2237:

Congratulations on blocking that one first. Your prize is a userpage free of vandalism!

2098: 1895: 1110: 801:) youngsters by giving them how many ever days to nudge their friends and point out how 2501: 2410: 2150: 2140:) For long blocks its easiest to list the time as indefinite. Keep up the good work. -- 1930: 1655: 1491: 1468: 1411:

section on Village pump. I wanted you to know I created a template for these accounts:

1123: 928: 669: 592: 574: 252: 211: 111: 2114:

Please stop reverting perfectly appropriate additions to Knowledge. It is considered

1879:

could have an election every other episode, are we going to put everyone of those in?

1765: 2523: 2255: 2229: 2119: 2036: 1979: 1953: 1941: 1264: 1226: 1211: 1196: 1184: 1104: 1088: 1070: 1014: 1006: 882: 758:

to tag it (as a check and balance kind of thing) A concurring admisistrator can then

684: 566: 521: 506: 492: 469: 457: 342: 308: 245: 190: 59: 2334: 1886: 1080: 2372: 2340: 2026: 1972: 1449: 1420: 709: 473: 465: 461: 1725:

How can you say that moving my comments on possible sockpuppets to other votes on

1300:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:Duplicate_articles&action=edit

2471: 2207: 2190: 2176: 2166: 2141: 2015: 1997: 1986: 1826: 1782: 1758: 1600: 1560: 1356: 898: 645: 543: 438: 428: 351: 267: 175: 90: 84: 2223: 1252: 2479: 2387: 2302: 2282: 2242: 1822: 1802: 1798: 1741: 1619: 1575: 1525: 1428: 1390: 1155: 1047: 1034: 917: 551: 299: 285: 146: 131: 45: 2514: 1458: 1206:

Alright, I have nominated you for adminship now - you can see your nomination

690: 2498: 2446: 2429: 2407: 2057: 1926: 1726: 1705: 1691: 1687: 1652: 1487: 1465: 1341: 1322: 1311: 1120: 993: 948: 925: 870: 862: 764: 754:

go through the Vfd tagging process themselves, or perhaps allow the the Next

733: 725: 697: 666: 608: 589: 571: 334: 281: 249: 208: 166: 108: 2380: 560: 368: 321: 2504: 2413: 2078: 2033: 1913:. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the 1880: 1856: 1658: 1639: 1471: 1259: 1245:

Just something to keep in mind when you become an admin yourself, soon ;-)

1126: 1101: 931: 672: 624: 595: 577: 255: 220: 214: 114: 76: 56: 2452: 1904: 937: 2294: 2022: 1967: 1445: 1416: 1246: 954:

Thanks for the apolgy and the answer. Here's the answer for both of us:

406: 231: 157: 1369: 1257:

Absolutely love the note you left on his talk page. That was priceless.—

1242:

very new article. And also to check the history of the one who made it.

708:

Thanks for your kind words, and vote in support of my admin nomination.

2175:

Or I could just undelete it for you. Let me know if you'd prefer that.

2045: 2012: 1754: 1143: 540: 348: 327: 2084: 1855:

has contributed. But, maybe it is something I just don't see. Advice?

1686:

A heads-up: I haven't tracked down who did it yet, but if you look at

1668: 1537: 1499: 1094: 1054: 983:

http://www.cheatplanet.com/pccheats/strategy/wing_commander_iii_iv.htm

913:

Potter, which could hardly be taken as anything other than bad faith.

718: 2352: 1918: 889:

of junk in both cats. I eventually started VFD/PC to alleviate this.

885:

is keeping an eye out for possible other misbehavior from that area.

539:

Could you reconsider your delete vote? I've rewritten the article.

359: 295: 2393: 1825:. Thanks for clearing that up. Congrats on your administratorship. 1781:

Either way, please leave one on my talk page. Sorry to be a bother!

1681: 1402: 2443: 1521: 1517: 1238: 397: 387: 2160: 1505:

I* am Izanbardprince, I forgot to log in so you saw my IP address.

583: 198: 2165:

I hadn't thought of that, Sjakkalle. Thanks for letting me know.

1444:

blocking. I'll change the template to the link you gave. Thanks!

2288: 2228:

Looks like we were both hot on the tail of the same varmint! :)

1940:

Congratulations, indeed. Have fun with the mop and bucket :) --

1718: 1612: 1863:

I just don't see the point of seperate articles. I don't watch

326:

eta -- this one explains that they changed their name in 2000.

2264: 924:

Well, there you go. Hope it wasn't too lengthy a rant. Yours,

1570:(For the English speakers this translates to something like: 1645: 916:

Because the first RFC was created somewhat in anger (citing

678: 1168: 2437: 2423: 2276: 2051: 1554: 1225:

Thank you for supporting my candidacy for administrator.

792:... but you knew that already. These vanity pieces are a 1774:? Anonymous IP 129.219.246.107 just left a comment for a 2442:

I just wanted to say thanks for your support on my RfA!

2428:

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. Cheers,

1871:, or The Pacific and Orient Line from an episode of the 427:

and see if it can't be dealt with without going to vfd--

2149:

Just remember you can't do that on anon IPs. Cheers! -

1952:

Yes, congrats. Enjoy your new life as a janitor. :-) --

1817:

I thought it was suspicious that they had signed it as

1116: 811:

these things need extremely fast and effective deletion

126:

Hi. When you've got a minute, could you take a look at

2132: 876: 703: 239: 330:

I hope I have done this correctly, apologies if not.

248:

to crystallize. Then I would happily accept. Thanks,

2402:, I've put together a proposal to expand CSD, here: 2365: 2346: 2032:

Guess I'll join the line to congratulate you now :)

1481: 783:"Oh, horrors. The poor servers, how will they... ", 2094:

Ok, Am reverting my changes. Sorry for the trouble.

2044:Well done -- now pick up that mop and shake it! -- 2011:Congratulations. Here's your mop and bucket. :) 2293:Howdy. You voted to delete the initial version of 1350: 1167: 1150:Taken off, I just thought it would be fair to not 785:etc. The problem is not to THOSE servers, but to 1651:more people would stick to your admin criterion. 2491: 660: 2404:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal 2090:Please do let me know what you think - Thanks. 1599:. I guess I will stick to English in future. -- 2353: 1271:Port Arthur Battles and Your Merger nomination 550:Nice rewrite. I have changed my vote to keep. 2118:. If you want to experiment, please use the 1966:Congratulations, Sjakkalle - well earned. -- 1849:U.S. presidential election, 2002 (fictional) 1772:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Andrew Harrison 486:As far as I can recall, I have never edited 2400:Knowledge:Deletion policy/Reducing VfD load 2339:"You recently made changes to my talk page 852:. Which is to say, Not! (Like my two boys) 846:If they instead vanished inside a half-hour 503:Critical Information on Jehovah's Witnesses 488:Critical Information on Jehovah's Witnesses 1901:for a few of them they must be unblocked. 1844:Is This an Article That Should be Deleted? 1115:Thank you for voting on my RFA. Have some 813:as soon as monitors spot them occuring. 1233:Just a quick friendly tip about speedying 869:In any event, thanks for the help! Frank 800:(I'm tempting to say parasites <G: --> 534:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Steve Yeager 2254:Well, for a few seconds, at least... :) 128:Talk:Sokolsky Opening#Popularity ranking 40:User talk:Sjakkalle/March and April 2005 1154:bite RickK on my admin criterion page. 850:they like writing as much as MOST TEENS 14: 1183:rare that we agree on Vfd pages :P -- 830:(as a check and balance kind of thing) 607:keep on eye on the pages affected. -- 565:Hi there! I've summarized the lengthy 382:Episodes from Ed, Edd n Eddy, Season 1 266:No problem, Smoddy beat me to it :) -- 174:As for the VfD, we'll see who wins... 2398:Hi there! Based on the discussion at 832:A concurring admisistrator can then 665:Thanks! We'll see how it turns out. 1486:Many thanks for supporting my RfA! 774:Re: debate on speedy delete subcat 23: 2281:Thank you for supporting my RFA. 1770:Sjakkalle: Did you cast a vote on 1520:article by making a copy of it at 1298:to deal with 'your' nomination on 1021:Can you check up on your userpage? 24: 2539: 803:They put one over on the serious 276:The delete template TFD withdrawn 28:New messages at the bottom please 2056:Thank you for supporting me! -- 1801:. I am based in Bergen, Norway. 1427:Thanks, I think I might use it. 1310:on being confirmed as an Admin! 1237:I noticed your speedy taging of 1195:nominated you for adminship? -- 472:should have its own article. -- 460:is that it is not equivalent to 55:vast archive of free knowledge. 2109:User:Troller Trolling Rodriguez 1407:I noticed your comments in the 968:subsidiary of Electronic Arts. 854:The vanished 'joke on Knowledge 1275:I think you need to relook at 972:1.3.* Copyright information 958:1.2.* Trademark information 13: 1: 2037: 1711:See my reply on my talk page 1595:rather than the presumptious 1137:Admin criterion - small thing 2351:Thank you for your support! 1923:administrators' how-to guide 1915:administrators' reading list 1033:than vandalism to articles. 1000:Automatic Speech Recognition 7: 2468:Frank Field (meteorologist) 2460:Frank Field (meteorologist) 2072:Discussion at Talk:Pakistan 1409:"Pre-empting impersonators" 1389:My mistake, self-reverted. 1267:) 15:47, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) 777:Using other processes first 10: 2544: 2511:June 28, 2005 08:10 (UTC) 2449:20:58, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) 2434:14:38, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) 2420:13:32, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) 2331:03:42, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) 2273:21:22, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2232:14:27, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2171:12:58, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2127:Troller Trolling Rodriguez 2029:21:20, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) 2018:18:17, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) 1761:) 12:50, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) 1740:most certainly vandalism. 1665:11:06, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) 1634:Thank you for your support 1630:23:14, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) 1496:12:50, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) 1478:12:23, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) 1423:12:37, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) 1229:14:41, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) 1221:Thank you for your support 843:look what I got away with! 675:08:13, May 31, 2005 (UTC) 598:12:12, May 30, 2005 (UTC) 580:10:59, May 30, 2005 (UTC) 546:05:20, May 29, 2005 (UTC) 448:Intersectionality redirect 378:07:50, May 26, 2005 (UTC) 354:09:35, May 26, 2005 (UTC) 258:09:03, May 24, 2005 (UTC) 217:10:42, May 20, 2005 (UTC) 2530:28 June 2005 11:58 (UTC) 2474:10:58, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2390:03:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2359:06:18, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2285:23:38, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2258:14:58, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2212:13:28, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2195:13:08, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2181:13:02, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2156:12:14, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) 2129:08:55, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2081:06:12, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2060:13:37, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2048:03:37, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC) 2041:21:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1992:17:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1982:15:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1936:12:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1859:07:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1793:20:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1749:12:45, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1715:12:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1694:12:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1678:12:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1642:05:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1583:14:19, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1566:14:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1452:12:53, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) 1366:10:58, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1314:22:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1249:08:45, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1217:11:14, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1190:10:04, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1133:07:56, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC) 1065:14:17, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC) 934:10:28, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC) 740:Dealing with vanity pages 715:13:39, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) 700:08:17, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) 328:FESU changes name to FENU 203:Please cast your vote at 2487:28 June 2005 12:02 (UTC) 2250:14:29, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2144:09:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2007:18:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1974:14:50, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC) 1961:14:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1947:13:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1837:13:13, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1810:06:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1606:14:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1533:13:09, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1436:12:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1398:12:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1344:12:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1325:06:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1202:10:50, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1146:07:11, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1107:00:44, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1091:15:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1042:15:27, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1017:14:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1009:16:51, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) 996:14:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) 951:14:59, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) 873:17:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 865:17:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 781:You opined humourously: 767:14:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 736:14:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 728:13:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) 656:07:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 612:13:47, 30 May 2005 (UTC) 555:07:56, 30 May 2005 (UTC) 528:15:15, 28 May 2005 (UTC) 510:13:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC) 496:13:18, 28 May 2005 (UTC) 477:07:23, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 464:, it just happened that 442:07:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 432:06:55, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 401:07:05, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 391:00:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 363:10:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 338:10:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC) 303:09:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 289:09:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 271:09:16, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 235:12:03, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 194:19:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC) 179:13:27, 14 May 2005 (UTC) 161:12:04, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 117:11:08, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 2099:Toddler: external links 1545:Knowledge:Verifiability 1163:09:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1111:Thanks for your support 1076:02:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1050:03:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) 639:14:51, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC) 627:13:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) 150:19:06, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 135:17:00, 7 May 2005 (UTC) 101:09:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC) 80:20:25, 6 May 2005 (UTC) 63:09:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1766:VfD on Andrew Harrison 1549:Knowledge:Cite sources 856:will bite them with a 807:in the Wiki-community. 417:Wikipedia_is_Communism 2335:RE: Your recent edits 1896:Sock Puppets, where!? 1887:Sock Puppets, where!? 1413:Template:doppelganger 1292:so the only real need 1277:Battle of Port Arthur 1082:Faith-based community 262:Willy on round things 68:User talk:194.83.77.2 1985:What they all said.— 1925:helpful. Cheers! -- 1281:Siege of Port Arthur 184:Re: James Broadwater 2224:I got him first! :) 1253:User: 81.129.154.77 1176:Knowledge:Vandalism 977:=================== 963:=================== 482:Jehovah's witnesses 122:Popularity rankings 18:User talk:Sjakkalle 2516:Knowledge:Checkers 1459:Eavesdrop ahead :) 1013:Thanks, I try :-) 691:Regarding Freifunk 376:A Link to the Past 140:Mother-in-law joke 2485: 2381:RfA for Sn0wflake 2328: 2321: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2248: 1808: 1747: 1581: 1531: 1434: 1396: 1161: 1040: 883:User:David Gerard 567:Knowledge:Schools 561:School discussion 470:Intersectionality 458:Intersectionality 425:Admin noticeboard 369:Comment on Blargg 246:Knowledge:Schools 2535: 2509: 2483: 2453:A clump of socks 2432: 2418: 2373:User:85.76.95.40 2357: 2341:User_talk:MARMOT 2329: 2326: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2246: 2039: 2004: 1970: 1905:Congratulations! 1806: 1745: 1663: 1579: 1529: 1476: 1432: 1415:. Check it out! 1394: 1363: 1159: 1131: 1038: 466:Radical Feminism 462:Radical Feminism 456:! My thought on 421: 415: 333:User:MJustice -- 97: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2519: 2506: 2494: 2455: 2440: 2430: 2426: 2415: 2396: 2383: 2368: 2349: 2337: 2325: 2318: 2303: 2291: 2279: 2267: 2226: 2163: 2135: 2112: 2107:A message from 2101: 2087: 2074: 2054: 2002: 1968: 1932:explains it all 1907: 1898: 1889: 1846: 1768: 1723: 1684: 1671: 1660: 1648: 1636: 1615: 1557: 1540: 1502: 1484: 1473: 1461: 1405: 1372: 1370:Sweetkisses.net 1361: 1353: 1308:Hearty Congrats 1306:. Thanks, and 1289: 1273: 1255: 1235: 1223: 1172: 1139: 1128: 1113: 1097: 1085: 1059: 1023: 1002: 979: 965: 940: 879: 809:My own view is 780: 742: 721: 706: 693: 685:Tony the Marine 681: 663: 653:Matt von Furrie 648: 604: 586: 563: 537: 518: 516:Lindsay Ashford 484: 450: 419: 413: 409: 384: 371: 345: 311: 280:Hi, I see that 278: 264: 242: 223: 201: 186: 169: 142: 124: 95: 87: 70: 48: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2541: 2518: 2513: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2470:. Thanks. -- 2454: 2451: 2439: 2436: 2425: 2422: 2395: 2392: 2382: 2379: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2348: 2345: 2336: 2333: 2290: 2287: 2278: 2275: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2183: 2182: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2134: 2131: 2122:. Thank you. 2111: 2105: 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2086: 2085:External links 2083: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2053: 2050: 2009: 2008: 1976: 1975: 1963: 1962: 1949: 1948: 1906: 1903: 1897: 1894: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1873:Rockford Files 1845: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1823:User:Sjakkalle 1812: 1811: 1799:Tempe, Arizona 1767: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1722: 1717: 1709: 1708: 1683: 1680: 1670: 1669:Removing votes 1667: 1647: 1644: 1635: 1632: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1556: 1553: 1539: 1538:Citing sources 1536: 1535: 1534: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1500:Izanbardprince 1498: 1483: 1480: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1438: 1437: 1404: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1371: 1368: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1337:my G'night!!!! 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1285: 1272: 1269: 1254: 1251: 1234: 1231: 1222: 1219: 1204: 1203: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1138: 1135: 1112: 1109: 1096: 1095:My RFA: Thanks 1093: 1084: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1074:(spill yours?) 1058: 1056:Lucky Octavian 1053: 1052: 1051: 1022: 1019: 1012: 1001: 998: 978: 975: 974: 973: 964: 961: 960: 959: 945: 944: 939: 938:Wing Commander 936: 878: 875: 867: 775: 772: 741: 738: 730: 720: 719:Wing Commander 717: 705: 702: 692: 689: 680: 677: 662: 659: 647: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 629: 628: 619: 618: 603: 602:User: Eyesopen 600: 585: 582: 562: 559: 558: 557: 536: 531: 525:(spill yours?) 517: 514: 513: 512: 483: 480: 449: 446: 445: 444: 408: 405: 404: 403: 383: 380: 370: 367: 366: 365: 344: 341: 324: 323: 310: 307: 306: 305: 277: 274: 263: 260: 241: 238: 222: 219: 200: 197: 185: 182: 168: 165: 164: 163: 141: 138: 123: 120: 119: 118: 86: 83: 69: 66: 47: 44: 43: 42: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2540: 2531: 2529: 2525: 2517: 2512: 2510: 2503: 2500: 2486: 2481: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2464:the litterbox 2461: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2435: 2433: 2421: 2419: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2394:CSD expansion 2391: 2389: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2356: 2344: 2342: 2332: 2330: 2323: 2316: 2300: 2296: 2286: 2284: 2274: 2272: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2249: 2244: 2240: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2231: 2221: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2194: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2170: 2168: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2130: 2128: 2123: 2121: 2117: 2110: 2104: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2082: 2080: 2069: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2059: 2049: 2047: 2042: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2006: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1988: 1983: 1981: 1973: 1971: 1965: 1964: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1935: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1911:administrator 1902: 1893: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1721: 1716: 1714: 1707: 1703: 1701: 1698:Aha - it was 1697: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1689: 1682:TFD vandalism 1679: 1677: 1666: 1664: 1657: 1654: 1643: 1641: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1532: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1504: 1503: 1497: 1495: 1494: 1489: 1479: 1477: 1470: 1467: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1403:Doppelgangers 1397: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1374:According to 1367: 1365: 1358: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1282: 1278: 1268: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1250: 1248: 1243: 1240: 1230: 1228: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1201: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1177: 1170: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1134: 1132: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1092: 1090: 1083: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1057: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1018: 1016: 1010: 1008: 997: 995: 989: 985: 984: 971: 970: 969: 957: 956: 955: 952: 950: 942: 941: 935: 933: 930: 927: 922: 919: 914: 910: 906: 902: 900: 894: 890: 886: 884: 874: 872: 866: 864: 859: 855: 851: 847: 844: 838: 835: 834:Speedy-Delete 831: 827: 823: 819: 814: 812: 808: 804: 799: 798:inconsiderate 795: 791: 790:(or Servants) 788: 784: 778: 771: 768: 766: 761: 757: 753: 750: 749: 737: 735: 729: 727: 716: 714: 711: 701: 699: 688: 686: 676: 674: 671: 668: 658: 657: 654: 638: 633: 632: 631: 630: 626: 621: 620: 616: 615: 614: 613: 610: 599: 597: 594: 591: 581: 579: 576: 573: 568: 556: 553: 549: 548: 547: 545: 542: 535: 530: 529: 526: 523: 511: 508: 504: 500: 499: 498: 497: 494: 489: 479: 478: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 443: 440: 436: 435: 434: 433: 430: 426: 418: 402: 399: 395: 394: 393: 392: 389: 379: 377: 364: 361: 357: 356: 355: 353: 350: 340: 339: 336: 331: 329: 322: 320: 319: 318: 314: 304: 301: 297: 293: 292: 291: 290: 287: 283: 282:User:Radiant! 273: 272: 269: 259: 257: 254: 251: 247: 237: 236: 233: 228: 218: 216: 213: 210: 206: 196: 195: 192: 181: 180: 177: 172: 162: 159: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 137: 136: 133: 129: 116: 113: 110: 105: 104: 103: 102: 99: 92: 82: 81: 78: 74: 73:Very well put 65: 64: 61: 58: 52: 41: 38: 37: 36: 35: 31: 30: 29: 19: 2524:Tony Sidaway 2520: 2495: 2456: 2441: 2427: 2397: 2384: 2376: 2369: 2361: 2354: 2350: 2338: 2292: 2280: 2268: 2256:Kelly Martin 2236: 2230:Kelly Martin 2227: 2219: 2164: 2161:Triple Curve 2124: 2113: 2102: 2088: 2075: 2067: 2055: 2043: 2031: 2020: 2010: 1984: 1980:Marine 69-71 1977: 1957: 1942:Ferkelparade 1931: 1908: 1899: 1890: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1847: 1780: 1775: 1769: 1737: 1730: 1724: 1710: 1685: 1672: 1649: 1637: 1616: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1571: 1558: 1541: 1513: 1508: 1492: 1485: 1462: 1406: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1373: 1354: 1336: 1335: 1307: 1303: 1302:Sub-heading 1295: 1291: 1286: 1274: 1260:chris.lawson 1258: 1256: 1244: 1236: 1227:Kelly Martin 1224: 1212:Ferkelparade 1205: 1197:Ferkelparade 1185:Ferkelparade 1180: 1173: 1151: 1140: 1114: 1098: 1089:Antares33712 1086: 1071:Mindspillage 1060: 1030: 1026: 1024: 1015:Antares33712 1011: 1007:Antares33712 1003: 990: 986: 980: 966: 953: 946: 923: 915: 911: 907: 903: 895: 891: 887: 880: 868: 858:joke on them 857: 853: 849: 845: 842: 839: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 815: 810: 806: 802: 797: 793: 789: 786: 782: 776: 773: 769: 759: 755: 751: 747: 745: 743: 731: 722: 710:Paul August 707: 694: 682: 664: 649: 605: 587: 584:Quantum sort 564: 538: 522:Mindspillage 519: 507:DavidWBrooks 493:DavidWBrooks 485: 474:Jan Tångring 451: 410: 385: 372: 346: 332: 325: 315: 312: 294:Sure. Done. 279: 265: 243: 226: 224: 202: 199:Vote request 191:Chanting Fox 187: 173: 170: 143: 125: 88: 71: 53: 49: 33: 32: 27: 26: 25: 2295:Tom Barnard 2289:Tom Barnard 1853:203.9.200.3 1733:vandalism? 1720:User:Thodin 1700:User:Thodin 1589:utnevnelsen 1493:bowl listen 1031:lot nastier 637:uberpenguin 452:Thanks for 2472:Mothperson 2265:RfA thanks 2208:SlimVirgin 2191:SlimVirgin 2177:SlimVirgin 2167:SlimVirgin 2003:Μελ Ετητης 1998:Mel Etitis 1593:nomination 1362:Μελ Ετητης 1357:Mel Etitis 1287:<g: --> 1210:. Cheers, 828:to tag it 787:US Servers 454:the advice 225:Well, all 207:. Thanks, 176:Physchim62 96:Μελ Ετητης 91:Mel Etitis 2480:Sjakkalle 2388:Sn0wflake 2283:Guettarda 2243:Sjakkalle 2116:vandalism 1919:Main Page 1877:West Wing 1865:West Wing 1819:Sjakkalle 1803:Sjakkalle 1742:Sjakkalle 1646:Boothy443 1620:Linuxbeak 1613:Thank you 1597:promotion 1576:Sjakkalle 1526:Sjakkalle 1429:Sjakkalle 1391:Sjakkalle 1156:Sjakkalle 1048:Megan1967 1035:Sjakkalle 981:Source: 746:nonsense' 679:Thank You 552:Sjakkalle 343:Vandalism 309:Greetings 286:Sjakkalle 147:Sn0wflake 132:Camembert 2484:(Check!) 2431:Bratsche 2247:(Check!) 2058:Kbdank71 2034:the wub 1927:Cecropia 1869:The Wire 1807:(Check!) 1746:(Check!) 1706:Shimgray 1692:Shimgray 1580:(Check!) 1555:Theo RFA 1530:(Check!) 1522:Wal-mart 1518:Wal-Mart 1514:Response 1488:Schissel 1433:(Check!) 1395:(Check!) 1342:Fabartus 1323:Fabartus 1312:Fabartus 1239:Godwinia 1160:(Check!) 1039:(Check!) 994:Fabartus 949:Fabartus 899:WP:POINT 871:Fabartus 863:Fabartus 820:. Save, 818:nonsense 805:devotees 794:huge WOT 765:Fabartus 748:. Save, 734:Fabartus 726:Fabartus 698:Sophitus 609:Scimitar 335:MJustice 34:Archives 2271:Willmcw 2120:sandbox 2079:PrinceA 2021:Ditto! 1958:phoenix 1881:WikiDon 1857:WikiDon 1640:JeremyA 1294:is for 1102:Zzyzx11 918:WP:DICK 826:monitor 756:monitor 696:made.-- 646:Sandbox 85:Schools 77:Andrewa 57:Zzyzx11 2502:adiant 2447:(Talk) 2438:my RfA 2424:Thanks 2411:adiant 2277:My RFA 2133:Blocks 2052:My Rfa 2023:Essjay 1990:(Talk) 1969:BD2412 1821:, not 1727:WP:TFD 1713:Thodin 1688:WP:TFD 1676:Thodin 1656:adiant 1604:(Talk) 1564:(Talk) 1469:adiant 1446:Essjay 1417:Essjay 1340:Frank 1247:Shanes 1124:adiant 1105:(Talk) 1063:Joyous 1027:really 929:adiant 877:GRider 760:Speedy 704:Thanks 687:(UTC) 670:adiant 651:like-- 625:Duffer 593:adiant 575:adiant 253:adiant 240:Admin? 232:Geogre 212:adiant 158:Geogre 112:adiant 60:(Talk) 46:My RFA 2508:|< 2507:: --> 2417:|< 2416:: --> 2366:4-4-0 2355:Grue 2327:EMAIL 2142:nixie 2046:Hoary 2038:"?/!" 1987:Theo 1954:Death 1662:|< 1661:: --> 1601:Theo 1561:Theo 1475:|< 1474:: --> 1144:Kappa 1130:|< 1129:: --> 439:nixie 429:nixie 268:nixie 167:Algoz 16:< 2528:Talk 2320:TALK 2027:talk 2013:Rick 1827:jglc 1783:jglc 1776:keep 1735:This 1704:... 1628:Desk 1624:Talk 1591:was 1547:and 1450:talk 1421:talk 1351:VfDs 1279:and 1265:talk 1208:here 1181:that 1169:Drug 1152:only 822:then 752:then 541:Rick 360:El_C 349:Rick 300:talk 296:Thue 227:four 221:Sigh 2492:VFU 2444:You 2347:RfA 2313:01D 2299:VfD 2239::-) 2151:Mgm 2025:· 1731:not 1729:is 1482:RfA 1448:· 1419:· 1304:"S" 1296:you 1117:pie 661:RFA 407:WoW 398:Who 388:Who 2522:-- 2386:-- 2241:-- 1929:| 1833:| 1829:| 1789:| 1785:| 1738:is 1626:| 1622:| 1574:) 1551:. 1524:. 1490:: 932:_* 673:_* 596:_* 578:_* 420:}} 414:{{ 298:| 256:_* 215:_* 189:-- 145:-- 115:_* 2526:| 2505:_ 2499:R 2414:_ 2408:R 2311:я 2309:D 2307:и 2305:A 2297:( 2153:| 2016:K 2005:) 2000:( 1945:π 1934:® 1835:c 1831:t 1791:c 1787:t 1759:t 1757:( 1755:W 1659:_ 1653:R 1472:_ 1466:R 1364:) 1359:( 1263:( 1215:π 1200:π 1188:π 1127:_ 1121:R 926:R 779:. 713:☎ 667:R 590:R 572:R 544:K 352:K 250:R 209:R 109:R 98:) 93:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index