Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

7616:(I paste here the answer I gave to Netherzone). Ok thanks for letting me know. Frankly, I am a bit surprised about your vision (even after I tried to explain a bit myself...). However, I will try to explain it better than I did in the past. I start from the Cilento International Poetry Prize: I read that many times you wrote that it is a Prize that Lerro gives to people to make them to adher to the Movement. As I have already told you, the Prize was born 2017 while the Movement was born 2020, therefore it means two things: first, that important authors accepted the prize before of the movement existence, and second that they have chose to adher to the Movement in a next moment (did you consider for a moment that maybe great authors, included a Nobel Prize for literature, are trusting this movement and wanted to be part of it? I do not think Menotti Lerro was so able to corrupt even all of them to promote himself and his movement...). Still, the Prize has been financed by Italian Ministry of Culture for 140.000 Euro (it happened in the last two years because they liked and trusted this Prize and the same Movement, which is part of the artistical project). Moreover, I wish to tell you I was creating these profiles starting from the list included in the ACCADEMIC VOLUME "The Empathic Movement, Cambridge Scholars 2023 and paperback 2024" published in UK of adherents to the Movement: I DID NOT do it to promote people and the movement in a malicious way, but I was thinking, in good faith, they were encyclopedic profiles, therefore I thought it would have been nice to create the lovely ferment which is involving so many important people both in Italy and abroud... (please look things from another point of view: a beautiful, new Movement is born and 200 and more good artist and scholars and people of culture wanted to be part of it... and now, after all this is already "living" in volumes and articals, I thought It was nice to put it also on Knowledge! The thing that you say that "someone adhering a Movement cannot talk of the same Movement or of his founder", is a bit unconfortable to answer for me: high literary cultured world is connected (thanks to God) therefore it is normal in this field they talk to each other and adher to a Movement of one of them if they respect him. But it is not a limit, or a cheating thing, it is just genuine relations and collaborations among artists, critics, poets, scholars, academics, ecc... they like the work of someone else in the same field or related field and want to talk, write criticism and sometimes adhere to a new movement... Critics such Alessandro Serpieri (writer), Francesco D'Episcopo, Roberto Carifi, Maurizio Cucchi, Giorgio Barberi Squarotti and many others have not been teachers of Menotti Lerro but just in the years they appreciated him, wrote of him and finally wanted to be in his Movement (what is wrong with this?) (and what is wrong if also his own old academic professors trust him so much to adher to his movement?) all this is just a merit, I think, not a bad thing. IN ADDITION: Please, do not quote only local articals: Lerro has been mentioned on many national and international articles such as Corriere della Sera, Il Mattino, Il Sole 24 Ore, The New Arab, "Gradiva" Magazine, "Poesia" Magazine, Nuovi Argomenti Magazine. I understand that something as this movement does not happen often... But can you just for a moment consider that a pretty interesting new Movement arose in 2020, from Italy, going on in a more or less fast way towards the World (it happened after so many decades that something like this did not happen... and never in the past something similar happened starting from the South of Italy...). Lerro is not a powerful, rich person who could be so able to influence so many important authors just to "cheat" academic publishers and now Knowledge... It seems just a relevant, new, beautiful situation spreading good feelings and literature and art in the World... (therefore i thought that also, and in particular, it should have be on Knowledge as the amazing expression of "💕" to welcome new pretty important, and maybe very relevant things.) In the Movement there are also young artists and cultured, passionate people and maybe ONE, TWO or THREE OF THEM WANTED TO MAKE THIS EFFORT to tell to the world also through Knowledge the beauty that all of them, starting from the founder - which has 4 academic titles (included MA in Uk and Phd) and studied and taught or was visiting around ten different universities, and wrote 40 creative fiction and no fiction volumes - are creating! You, maybe, should help all of it and be pleased to help to put it on Knowledge... Do you think that good authors could exist just in the past? Maybe Lerro is one that is working pretty well nowadays... cannot be? (would you so surprised for instance if a Nobel Prize was creating this Movement?). Well, Lerro is not a Nobel Prize but it does not mean he cannot create a notable movement or being a good author the same... I think. In conclusion, dear Netherzone, I ask you to not go too far with your thoughts and ideas about what is going on. All of this is extremely clean, and fruit of deep work and passion. Please look things from another point of view and, if you can, I ask you even to help to improve some of the profiles have been created. Maybe not all of them are encyclopedic (sorry if I thought so) but many are at 100%, starting with the Nobel adhered to the movement who DID NOT receive the "Cilento Prize", while the Nobel Prize for literature 2023 got this year the "Cilento Prize" and I see he did not adhere to the Movement... (so as you can see, maybe things are not really as you are thinking. I hope you can change your mind and, as I said, even help a bit if you like...). Thank you a lot to give me the opportunity to explain a bit better everything. With very best wishes. 11121:, in the same way that even an entirely different editor's conduct can become the focus of an ANI discussion, so too can other behaviour by the reported editor--even be it very distantly related to the original matter raised. And I'm not so entirely convinced that the intersection here is as small as you frame it. Now obviously, I just very vociferously defended your opening of those RfCs as presumptively valid actions, absent more particular evidence on disruption on your part. That is because, for better or for worse, wars of subjectivity over lead images are just a phenomena on this project that aren't going anywhere, and RfCs are probably the quickest way of resolving them. As such, even given that you are opening more of them than is typical for a given editor, I didn't see that it was reasonable to penalize you for what I assume are good faith (if arguably mostly pointless) efforts to make your case for a change on each article. That said, this additional infobox issue highlights just how pedantic you are willing to be about the smallest and most inconsequential of changes, how divorced your arguments can be from a policy predicate, and how many characters-worth of time (your own, and finite community time) you are willing to spill to pursue your preferred vision of these tiny details. The order of those names in that infobox is not something even your typical devoted WWII history editor would think was worth invoking an edit. Among those few who would, almost all of them would recognize it was certainly not worth edit warring over, and among those who did edit war (however briefly), fewer still would have thought the matter worth a talk page dispute. Now, I discount the lack of perspective there somewhat, because the discussion clearly illuminates the fact that you are not the first to dispute the ordering of those names--which just goes to show that, much as with some of the persons they cover, for some of our military history editors, there really is no hill too small to die on. But what really pulls this behaviour into potentially disruptive territory is that once you created the discussion, the arguments you proceeded upon were constructed of nothing but idiosyncratic views and 10868:

second most populous nation had just ordered the project to remove certain content which was the subject of the dispute. Pretty much the best case for the necessity of the process, and someone questioned it, reflexively. Now, I'm not stating that editor's name here because their approach isn't the issue. My point is that if you open an RfC at present, it gets challenged; that's almost always a given reality. So from the start I'm not considering pushback an automatic indicator that there is a problem with an given proponent's approach to RfC. Now, are the number or the hit rate more concerning to me? Not really on the number: one or two a month on average is well within what I consider acceptable rates. The fact that the status quo was retained roughly 84% of the time does suggest that at least some of these could have been avoided. But as I mentioned at the outset here, opinions on the best lead images tend to be quite varied and loosely bounded by the policy language on point. It is just one of those things which often best solved by bringing in a cluster of un-involved editors to break the deadlock. And they are often the quickest, most painless and straight forward discussions you will have, with a clear consensus usually formed quickly. Yes, when I get to one, I do often honestly do a little eyeroll that this discussion couldn't have been resolved short of RfC. But then commenting is quick and these RfCs more often than not end up being a little amuse-bouche of a dispute. And for me, the aggregate community time spent only has to be lesser than any disruption that might have been caused by leaving the issue unresolved between two small, entrenched camps unable to reach a consensus by itself. Long and the short of it: I'm not seeing the issue with the existence of these discussions, so far as has been presented here so far.

11129:. But you brought absolutely no such to bear, and the main thing that seems to have animated you was the perspective that Stalin, "a mass-murdering dictator with a death toll that rivals that of Adolf Hitler at the top of the Allied Powers" above FDR. Now, is all of this worth a sanction? No, not really. But taken with the rest above, it does highlight some very salient points you clearly need to take on board. You are chewing through too much community time for too little gain (both because your positions in these cases are generally non-winners and even if they were, the benefit of the changes is too minuscule compared to the effort needed to effect them). In short, you need to do a better job of picking your battles, because sooner or later it will not just be community time that these issues will be sapping, but also community patience. Even good faith activities by well-intentioned volunteers can be judged net-negatives to the project, given certain particulars. 14043:

don't think that this user deserves an indefinite ban from GAN/FAC/FLC/PR/DYK. I'd support a 6 month restriction that sawyer proposed instead. TheNuggeteer should in the future address concerns and constructive criticism from other more experienced contributors instead of ignoring them. During this 6 month period (if approved), they could work on improving other parts of Knowledge such as those that asilvering proposed. I feel like you've also received enough information on what things you should improve on from your GANs. The main concern seems to be the prose and the use of non-encyclopedic tone. As a side activity, I'd strongly recommend you take a look at our other (recently promoted) GAs and FAs, read the criteria more thoroughly, and learn how those articles were constructed. The restriction could possibly become indefinite if others conclude that you did not improve after your first temporary restriction.

10863:

so loose and the precedents so indeterminate that subjectivity creeps in and you just have to bring in extra voices and have a straight forward consensus. RfC is one of my main modes of talk space contribution; I think I've contributed to somewhere between 1,000-1,200 over the last 15 years. And what I've noticed over the last few years is an absolutely startling uptick in efforts to shoot down most RfCs before they have even started on either procedural grounds or a general implication that the RfC is unnecessary. Honestly, it's the vast majority today: it is much more the norm than the exception, now. We actually just had what might be reasonably described as our most important important RfC to take place on an article talk page in years, and the very first comment in that discussion? A suggested procedural close because

14164:

TheNuggeteer chooses to work on Knowledge moving forward, it is clear that they need to improve their communication with and ability to accept feedback from other editors when valid concerns are being raised. They seemingly ignored or did not pay serious attention to the issues that were raised on their talk page several times and the GAN talk page, and did not appear to take the feedback they were receiving on board. That is why this ultimately ended up at ANI. If this persists, I'm afraid we might end up back here again at some point in the future. In addition to temporarily stepping away from featured content processes, it is my hope that TheNuggeteer also uses this opportunity to make constructive changes in their approach to communicating with other editors and responding to their concerns.

11817:. Do understand that while it's important editors follow our policies and guidelines and we have some that are fairly strict (like more than three reverts), we don't generally follow an overly legalistic system where there are firm objective rules which you must follow and anything not in violation of these firm rules is fine. While I understand this can be difficult for some editors, unfortunately if you want to edit here you're going to have to learn to work within a system where we don't have such strict rulemaking. If multiple experienced editors are telling you what you're doing is not conducive to building and encyclopaedia, you generally should take their advice onboard rather than demanding they point to some specific rule you're violating. 9473:

indefinite blocks. Also, I'll copy something I wrote at Wikipediocracy re IP school blocks: I check the last school year's contributions of an IP range before I block them and if a significant portion of their edits are tagged as reverted (a relatively new feature), I block them ... and sometimes find unreverted vandalism that way. Usually for the ones I've blocked like 90% of their edits are vandalism to either articles or talk pages and the other 10% are either silly but harmless replies to their user talk page or updates to their school's article (which are sometimes good, sometimes not). A lot of pages are on my watchlist because of vandalism, often from school IP's, that has gone unreverted for a while.

4741:. I patrol a long list of Western, Central and Southern Asian articles, which are constantly plagued by these type of users. The majority of them would be a shitshow if I didn't almost single handedly take care of them (including making hundreds of SPIs). I don't do or say this to get thanked or some sort of badge of honor. However, I am not a fucking punching bag, and I wonder if the same carelessness was shown if I belonged to a more historically persecuted group, such as an African American or Jew. Let's be honest, it wouldn't, and that's a good thing. Such behaviour should be taken seriously - but that should equally apply to ALL backgrounds. -- 6360:, though I had assumed at the time it was because of my errors in editing, then went one for several more hours to make my additions in the same style of the original article, yet I can't help but see this as another user who simply hates Arabs, and Arab sources. The note is Xenophobic, offensive, and worthless. Why is the summary of the battle being used as a springboard for an agenda? That literally what it is being used for, not what it is assumed to be used for. Not only did I not remove the note, I simply added more information to the topic. But the first user here added the link here from the talk page, hence the second user's remark. 9918:

and may still do, Knowledge is not a utopian social experiment. Vandals exist. Point-of-view pushers and promotional editors exist. Well-meaning doofuses can do a lot of damage, and that includes newbies and people lacking the competence to edit for whatever reason, and also people fixated on "correcting" the English of articles. Admins are made admins in large part for their cluefulness in identifying all of those problems and figuring out how to deal with them. What's largely happened in this case, I think (I disagree with Graham87 about school IPs) is that his use of the blocking tool has indeed diverged from community expectations, as

11869:, at this point, I think that this discussion would end if you simply stopped replying to everyone and stopped trying to defend yourself. No one has proposed sanctions, they raised concerns and I hope what they said had an impact on your future conduct around RFCs and a reconsideration if all of the ones you started were really necessary. But I think this whole discussion would end if you ceased replying to every comment and returned to regular editing. But if the problems perceived by other editors persist, there might be a return visit to ANI. As for now, I recommend disengaging from this discussion. 3830:. If any of the those three points were not the case, I wouldn't have closed it. Any RFC that had a chance would require rewriting—as their attempt to do so in reopening shows. I have no compunctions about it being a SNOW close if I'm to trust my own faculties, and I feel that's been vindicated by the fact that no one has challenged the close on its merits—as opposed to challenging it on procedural grounds as you're doing here (and are completely within your rights to do, of course). That it seemed appropriate to do after only a day is a function of just how weak the RFC's premise was. 8368:

Empathetic Movement that lists all of their names or the claim is based on the fact that they won this literary award. I think this is a weak attribution and the statement that an academic belongs to a literary movement should be based on statements by that author themselves, we should take the claims of the movement on who its members are. And I think if the article subjects have a demonstratable notability based on their academic or literary work, we shouldn't hold it against them that an editor with a different COI created or contributed to these articles.

3810:, my question to you is why did you close this RFC after one day? RFCs typically last at least one week or longer. And I don't think 3 editors' opinion merits a SNOW close after just one day. I think our understanding of SNOW has gotten way out of whack, it's used too often when there is just a small group of editors who agree when it is supposed to be used for a tidal wave of Keeps, not just 3 editors. That's a "consensus" that could easily change with a few more participants and 1 day is not long enough for editors to even discover that the RFC is going on. 7712:

by the other. I repeat, they are only hipotethical cases, just to tell you, that there are possibilities... (but I see you just want to find a good reason to offend myself...). Maybe another thing is that in the second house in the same little village lives there with old parents in a secon house he goes to visit sistematically.... (you should not be so strict to imagine the reasons of others, in case it would be really the same person). Anyway, all of these are only suppositions to let you consider reasons at your focused question. All the best

12610:. In brief, "poop" is vandalism but changing a default category sort may be an incorrect good-faith edit. Also, Commons links are sometimes unhelpful and their presence needs at least a nod of discussion. However, the IP is making about a hundred edits a day but has never commented. Many of their edits have been reverted so I issued a partial block for three days to encourage them to start discussing their proposed changes. Let me know if it continues without consensus but please try to engage them in a discussion without templated warnings. 5676:) has been made aware of their talk page but does not respond there or here. Since the mainspace-block, they have repeatedly recreated an article on their user page and repeatedly uploaded a copyright-violating image to Commons to use on their user page ( that's being dealt with on Commons). The article on their user page was deleted yesterday by Justlettersandnumbers under U5, and Edit the error has just restored it. With their problematic edits, refusal to communicate, and misuse of userspace, I think it's time to stop the disruption. 3163:: they has repeteadly derailed the RFC and refusing to engage in constructive dialogue. Preventing consensus. they has actively worked to prevent the community from reaching a wider consensus by monopolizing the discussion and dismissing opposing viewpoints. Gagging the procedure: their actions have effectively stifled the RFC process, preventing the community from having a fair and open discussion. I urge you to take immediate action to address this issue and ensure that the RFC can proceed in a productive and respectful manner. 10164:

sing or say negative things about the UK, and seems determined to call them "Anglophobes" without bothering to provide references to reliable sources describing them as Anglophobes. His edits to various members of the Farrell family are to attempt to deny that they are English while failing to produce any reliable sources that they are not English. My conclusion is that this editor is an ethnonationalist POV pusher who simply does not see the need to provide references to reliable sources verifying his contentious assertions.

4322:"Further provoking editors who are already clearly upset"? Sorry, but really? What gives them the right to be upset? Are we just going to ignore their blatantly xenophobic (borderline racist) attacks? I am the one who should be upset here. I am just following procedure, I can't have the patience of a saint when a user is persistently attacking me and just generally disregarding our policies. You gave them a chance to strike their personal attacks, they refused and doubled down. Are there not any repercussions? Or is 8388:, I agree that many of these claims were added by the socks promoting Empathism rather than a neutral source or the person themself. I too found that the list of "members" or "adherents" were coming from Lerro/Empathism or from the socks. Many of these people are indeed notable, some are not. To my way of thinking we should keep the notables but remove the promo/spam, and either AfD or redirect the non-notables that were simply added because they signed the Empathism manifesto or were designated a "member". 11905:

much of their own time and other editors' time launching discussions on them, with or without RfC tags, and without even checking whether the matter has been discussed already, all for the most diminished of diminishing returns. Still, before this thread was sidetracked onto counting reverts, Emiya1980 has been formally warned by one administrator and strongly advised to move on by another. Maybe it's not unreasonable for the community to hope that's sufficient without formal sanctions at this time.

7661:

this thing (arriving to mock me... "indomito teatrante" and such) which, sorry, doesn't seem so relevant to me... (but maybe I was and I am wrong. I don't reeally know so well all these rules... Sorry!) My connection is that of someone, with a bit of knowledge of literature and art, passionate of all this new work has been done and the nice ferment is going on. If I can I will keep writing happily of it, if I cannot anymore, because I did something wrong, I will stop. Thank you a lot. All the best.

2349: 11844:

they are already aware that their contribution there was, even though in alignment with the ultimate disposition of the infobox, less than ideal behaviorally. My comments here and elsewhere (forever) indicate that I am sometimes pedantic and am usually willing to continue arguments when others would think it a waste of time and effort. If those other edits can illuminate a behavioral pattern, that can give us an idea of what to expect in the future, and therefore what changes to recommend.

13503: 14183:. I also think that TheNuggeteer needs to address their lack of communication with others as well as how they have seemingly ignored feedback from others. Their lack of communication is ultimately what led us here and I don’t feel that a topic ban will be sufficient without them improving this pattern of behaviour. Additionally I think they should do a co-review or at least have someone checking over their reviews if/when they return to the GA process. 9902:

often can be hard to distinguish a paid editor from somebody who just wants to write an article on a musician or influencer they like. That's why the SPI backlog is so long. Still, it's better to let a sockpuppet or COI go than it is to block legitimate editors who are trying to learn. We do need a lot more admins to handle various backlogs, but driving out newbies before they can gain experience is only going to make the problem worse in the long run.

12657:

edits. Not a peep since their block either. I understand reaching out (non-templated) and I often do, especially on conflict-specific article talk pages with pings. But I was not expecting much from this IP, and I'm still not going forward. Communication of their reasoning is clearly not of interest to them. I however completely expect them to resume their disruptive edits and edit warring upon the removal of their block.

7791:"One, Two, Three" is just to say I DO NOT KNOW if there are more people involed in creating the articles... It could be one, or two or three or ten as for all Knowledge articles i guess, (I was not really thinking at all of this). I really let me know I do not understand your aim starting from personal little mocking you did on me since the beginnig. Maybe someone should look at yo too... Kind regards 6620:

the range Arab sources cite. Why is this note not being left in place for all the Greco-Persian battles now? According to the reasoning deployed in the aforementioned article by the two users here, where primary sources are omitted for the sake of offensive remarks, all numbers in all Greco-Persian battle articles (in particular the summary) ought be omitted for the sake of that singular note, which

7477:, and it’s various projects and members. It’s obviously a COI project, and I feel confident in saying it is likely UPE – perhaps the work of a PR firm to promote Lerro and his associates and projects. Both editors have denied having a COI, claiming to be fans, however Gingeksace admitted asking Lerro for photos to publish, however for an “unconnected” editor they sure know a lot about Lerro’s life. 9930:

different kinds of cases, how rapidly do they block, when do they use indef, how long are their blocks on IPs. Some of your comments, here and elsewhere, indicate you study editors who you think might be promotional, and schools that produce problematic edits. Step back from blocking and instead turn that analytical focus on current blocking practice for a while. You've drifted from best practice.

11769:

unfamiliar with our policies and guidelines. Even after receiving the warning, you apparently continued to believe you weren't edit warring when you were. Your understanding of what is edit warring was fairly flawed. While apparently the edit warring didn't resolve your confusion and there is always debate over templated warnings vs a personalised message, it seems fair for Nick-D to have tried.

9217:...once they make such an unambiguous statement I agree that an immediate block is reasonable. There is no alternative beyond "you are prohibited by policy from editing unless and until you withdraw it", and it's reasonable discretion to enforce that with a block. Legal threats aren't a level1 up to level4 warning situation, and it's not for us to try to discern how serious they are about it. 7481: 8428:, as one example. I don't think the listing of his name among many others on an empathist web page is adequate sourcing for this. He did edit a volume of poetry by Lerro but it doesn't seem very central to his publications. I agree with Liz above that if any of the rest of this pile of articles avoids deletion, we should look carefully at whether any empathist claims are warranted. 10900:

example of you speaking to a second community member like you spoke to Nemov there, we'd probably be talking about a serious sanction right now. I know I would be amenable to a topic ban at the minimum. The fact that, even in the heat of the moment, you thought that was an acceptable way to interact in a collaborative workspace raises serious questions about your

10601:

of other editors if they so rarely change the status quo. I'm not against change but it looks like this hasn't been an effective way to change articles. It could be low participation (an issue all over the project) or the wording of the RFC or just your timing. But if you keep trying a method with little success, I'd probaly move on and try something else.

10561:, I have no obligation to give you my assessment at this point. As an administrator, I am still investigating and I expect you to answer my questions frankly and honestly as you did my initial question. Please do so. Stonewalling is not a good strategy for you. Be fully responsive to the concerns about your RFC conduct that have been raised here. 13088:. I got called a "dictator" even though 316 Knowledge editors supported me becoming an administrator and I do my best every single day to justify that support. Most amusingly, I got called "little". There are quite a few active editors who have met me face to face over the years, and they can all attest that I am 6'-3" and about 240 pounds. 11534:

to. I really don't feel like taking the aspersions seriously, but it's fairly clear that our positions expressed were not the same: I thought the ordering was arbitrary and likely shouldn't be changed because it could cause further disruption, while Nick-D did not think it was arbitrary, and claimed the ordering was based in what RS say.

6409:, are you using primary sources on an article about a battle from antiquity? You should not be doing that, no, except in certain circumstances (such as to say something like "Tertullian said that 'blah blah'; however, modern historians believe that 'blah blah'." Weaving together an article based on historical sources from antiquity is 1776:. Responding to people with things like "so according to me it doesn't make sense" and "it's still unfair" are not helpful or substantive. Make all your points and leave others to make theirs and let the closer evaluate consensus. An ANI warning was fair at this point, though I don't think action needs to be taken if you actually 12549:), removing Wikiquote templates, Rotten Tomatoes templates, as well as TCMDb, AFI, stub sorting templates et al. Supported with no edit summaries. They are now edit warring to restore their desired versions. Given their far-reaching dedication I would not be surprised if this is an IP sock of a past persistent vandal. 8521:, and others, while other editors are draftifying those with potential or redirecting others if there's a suitable target; I've been cleaning up the ones that seem to be notable and doing a little of all of the above. This sort of teamwork on a clean up effort like this is such an amazing aspect of this community. 15736:"Indeed, Skitash account opposes the introduction of Tamazight for the official name of the country. even the official language is not spared from pov-pushing. (In addition to the manipulation of sources which aim to make people believe that 85% of the population of Algeria originates from the Arabian Peninsula)." 14496:'s user page proudly states their status as "Knowledge Evader" and also calls for people to use their talk page to chat with. I wasn't very sure whether ANI was the right place to put this since it's labeled as "for urgent incidents", but AN says that narrow issues, like user related ones, should be put in ANI. 12541:- I and others have warned this IP numerous times. They vandalised past my 4th warning so I reported them at AIV but was directed to take the issue here. Their edits are varied but focus on horror film-related articles. They include incorrectly altering sortkeys, refactoring book ISBNs without hyphens (against 9943:

promotionalism. (And personally I think you're overly suspicious of new editors who show clue or even familiarity with the rules or the mark-up. Sometimes they're long-term IP editors, people using some WMF gizmo, retired professors, computer professionals, or simply geniuses ... but I'm known for my naïveté.)

9403:. I hope it continues and, on second thought, was hasty with my earlier comment. I don’t want to see him deysysopped, but the community doesn’t have the power to decide whether or not someone has used the tools fairly. When there’s reasonable arguments to be made for either side, I do support escalation. 10749:, I have already directed you to the appropriate pages and asked you to take on board the feedback you have received from other editors. If you choose to reject that advice, then please be prepared for some negative consequences if you ignore the warning that I gave to you. The choice is entirely yours. 5004:

offense to HoI keeping strictly to our requirements for sourcing and NPOV in this topic area. Zemen's personal attacks should not be taken lightly, and their claims of "typos" around ethnic insults are not believable. Seeing admins dismiss them out of hand & accuse HoI of "bullying" is appalling. —

5222:) uses the iOS mobile app to edit. Although they've only been editing since 6 September, their talk page is full of messages and warnings. They found their user page (and are using it to draft an article) but there's no sign that they've seen their talk page. Some of the messages are about copyright. 4413:

serious attempt to try to take the temperature down when dealing with content disputes, even if you think the other editor is stupid, wrong, rude, or all three. What you've done here instead is try to get the other editor blocked. You should both apologize to each other for the misunderstandings (yes,

13865:

does a review with a more experienced reviewer. I know co-reviews aren’t common with GA but I think this could be really helpful in the learning process. I did try to reach out with this idea but didn’t get much of a response. Either this or if they choose to do reviews after their ban someone checks

13493:

TheNuggeteer has been given every opportunity to receive guidance from more experienced editors, but shows no signs that they understand they are being disruptive, nor that they are taking steps to prevent it. I cannot in good conscience recommend an indefinite block against a good-faith editor, so I

11602:

I'm still hashing out my position on drive-by templating: at this moment, this is a case where putting a big maintenance banner atop a highly developed, highly visible article for what is a potential but not universally perceived problem—is more disruptive and unhelpful than you starting a discussion

11287:

The first makes your bold change; the second reverts to your bold change. (The third is unrelated.) Making a change, getting reverted, re-reverting, and being re-reverted again actually can constitute edit warring. It might not be a problem worth enforcing – you know that if the speed limit is 40,

10867:

hadn't been satisfied. Nevermind that the most cursory search of the archives and the circumstances would have immediately revealed that it was a highly contentious issue going back to the article's inception, that there had been numerous previous discussions, or that the Supreme Court of the world's

10637:

If I do what, exactly? You have yet to provide me with specific criteria on when it is or is not appropriate to open an Rfc in the future. Unless you say otherwise, this seems less like a constructive warning and more like an indefinite ban on my ability to open Rfcs even if I have a valid reason for

9917:

Here from the Wikipediocracy thread, where I've weighed in a few times and so for transparency's sake, I should join the conversation here, too. Speaking as a former admin and also just as a long-time editor ... I appreciate Graham87's working to protect the encyclopaedia. As it used to say somewhere

9811:

I'm neutral on whether anything ought to be done about Graham87, but I do want to suggest that the current state of the unblock request list perhaps aggravates this type of thing. You have a relatively small number of admins taking on an extremely large workload that -- let's be honest -- consists of

9170:

The NBM of Africa, which is known as the Neo-Black Movement of Africa is registered under the laws of Nigeria. This published article is defamatory and we as an organization will not stand and watch criminals or unscrupulous elements damage the reputation of this Organization. We have written a court

8751:- Keeps making unsourced date changes, hasn't responded to warnings, and /64 has previously been blocked for 3 months in February 2024 and a month in November 2023 for disruptive editing - every edit from this /64 going back months is unsourced date changes. Recent examples of unsourced date changes: 7726:

PS about my words "we all know that about many authors there are people close to that authors" I just wanted to say that usually it is clear that very often behinde contemporary authors there are people close to them... It is at the least my impression. But I did not mean myself in that close way...

7465:

Regarding User:Nihaon created 7 articles on Lerro’s Empathic Movement members/adherents during the same time as Gingeksace creating dozens. Nihaon also removed COI templates from several articles involving Lerro & Empathism. Of their 900-some edits most have been to add content or name-drop Lerro

6619:

to scare away anyone that's after the spread of inconvenient facts. It seems the article for the battle is being used as a springboard to cast a shadow of doubt over all Arab sources with a note, one that is utterly nonsensical by the fact that non-Arab sources use figures that are actually MORE than

6180:

In the talk page the user refuses to include anything that doesn't agree with them I'm new to the wiki interface so I cannot use wiki as weapons of abuse as well as he can. I am not interested in engaging with a party that actively hampers knowledge. Here is the previous wiki page, Please look at and

4412:

Let me put it this way: what I see here is an experienced user deciding to bully a less-experienced user with an ANI report instead of trying to calmly resolve a content dispute that went only mildly sideways before the ANI threats started. Has Zemen behaved well? No. Have you? Also no. Please make a

4349:

more experienced editor, I'd expect that you know when to take a step back. I haven't looked at the sources, but given your experience, I expect you're the one who has the right of the content dispute here. Once you can explain that to the other editor without feeling needled by their response (which

4344:

Anyone has the "right" to be upset. It's a normal human emotion, and it's perfectly normal to feel that way when someone has frustrated you. Reversions are frustrating; they're upset. You feel attacked and are also upset. I can certainly understand your frustration. But neither of you are going to be

4096:

I asked you once directly and three times indirectly to end the arguments because we won't reach a conclusion, and you don't like to see 'a word', but you kept going, that I don’t know what you want. you can just remove my edits and let me know what to do in the edit summary, not come to my talk page

2704:

Alright, I'll bite: since you have no personal information on your user page, how is it the charity could have possibly found you on social media? How would the police be coming to your door? As far as "weaponising" the Online Safety act goes, the information about the inquiry appears not merely to

13556:

I empathize with you when you say this is incredibly scary, because frankly, this forum generally is. Especially for people still new to some aspect of Knowledge. What I would advise right now, before the heat gets intense and gets to you, is to step away from the site for a couple of days and allow

11673:

I don't know how long you've been reading this thread but the tone is hardly what I would characterize as friendly. The overall aim by some of the editors here seems to be to significantly limit if not outright stifle any further contributions of mine to this project. If I sound "manic", that is the

11533:

deserves any particular sanction or redress, that's news to me. Secondly, could you please relax? Casting aspersions against me or others seems like another unneeded ratcheting up of what is already a fairly manic dialogue on your part. As someone who is also capable of mania, it is not fun to reply

10461:

Outside of this focus on infobox image RFCs, Emiya1980 seems like a good editor, but they’re taxing the RFC process with needless RFCs. I could understand if they were improving the project, but most of the RFCs are ending in status quo. Maybe it’s time to focus on something else? The RFC process is

10163:

without providing a reference verifying this highly contentious claim. I could be wrong but I have been unable to find reliable sources that verify that Oliver has renounced his UK citizenship or that he broadly dislikes "British people". The editor also clearly dislikes Irish musical performers who

9929:

Graham87, stop blocking people (except for the most obvious and nasty vandals) and recalibrate your sense of blocking policy and its implementation. Maybe choose 2 or 3 admins active in blocking (and not checkusers or other special cases) and analyse their blocks in recent months: what do they do in

9901:

I do a lot of SPI work, so I completely understand how difficult it can be to maintain a good attitude when dealing with the worst of the worst. Still doesn't excuse this. I often close SPI cases without action even when my instincts tell me they're a sock, because I can't prove it. Even for UPE, it

9816:

when they just come in to review a single editor's appeal on a request than it is for an admin who has just spent hours dealing with UPEs, angry failed autobiographers, and vandals. If there are admins who have the ability and time to provide assistance here, I'd urge them to consider reviewing more

8553:

Sure thing, there are a few AfD's for some with questionable notability, and I noticed this morning that another editor had PRODDED 4 or 5 articles. Mostly what needs to be removed from the notables is the spam/promo about Menotti Lerro and his "cultural movement", the Empathic Movement (Empathism).

7853:

Anyway, please, try to consider that in that case I even did not could imagine these things... (people I guess does not even know about all these a bit inedd strict rules...). And honestly I think that I have explained very deeply my reasons and goood faith even if I did some whatever eventual thing

7808:

Sadly your approach over the years has always been that your abuses are unimportant and that other users should overlook them. If only you had just read the relevant policies and abided by them we wouldn't be here now. But here we are looking at a sockmaster operating multiple accounts in one narrow

7545:

I then looked at the two users’ overall editing histories and noticed that they never seem to be online at the same time, often having clear days when only one is online, or otherwise apparently tagging each other in and out through the course of a day (as for example on Sept 1, 15, 17, 19, 20 &

5852:

when I got bombarded by a bunch of talk page notifications and emails that I couldn't clear. It's hard to figure out how to get rid of that yellow banner when the software doesn't like the location of your talk page. And then you panic/lose a lot of good faith given the new location of my user page.

5022:

out of hand here. I have said (quite clearly, I think) that Zemen has behaved poorly, and that it's entirely understandable that both editors here are upset. I have not said that there should be no actions taken. I remain convinced that it's always best to be collegial to editors you're in a content

3364:

inadvertent about my revert of your edit. It's bizarre that you interpreted Remsense's comment as justification to reopen the RFC, it was inappropriate for you to reopen that RFC (let alone for the second time), and it was even more inappropriate for you to change the wording of the rfc after it was

2815:

Hmm. As a Brit myself, I am unconvinced by "it's a small country where everyone knows everyone." I am certainly not on friendly terms with every single one of the other 69 million people on these isles. Regardless, about the article - that section dominating an article for a 156-year old charity is

15901:

The atrticle is a highly controversial subject and massibe deletion is a cleaar red flag. You have to be careful with edits. Ideally you have to split your edits in two: (A) remove redundancy (B) do additions and fixes. It is insanelyt difficult to track and verify in the article diffs what exactly

14561:

Well, Northern Moonlight linked the version of their userpage above in their reply. You can see Hexerade makes that bold claim about ban evasion themselves. As for their edit to that page, it's a pretty simple and honestly trivial addition to the lead of a list article. I am assuming good faith for

12639:

If you have posted a lot of templated warnings on their talk page, they really do not need you repeating it all again. Post a regular talk page message, trying to connect with the editor rather than posting any more notices. The goal is to get this editor to communicate, not to scold them. But this

12624:

Thank you, Johnuniq. Sorry for any imprecise language. I was going to start a non-templated discussion on their talk but noticed you have already done so. I already (as required) notified them of this ANI discussion. So I won't repeat all of my grievances listed here. But I will make mention of the

11904:

Infobox images and details such as the precise order in which WWII world leaders are listed are attractive to new editors, and we tolerate a degree of futile editing and discussion while hoping that they'll soon move on to greater improvements. I'm baffled that a long-standing editor would spend so

11843:

Of course, any and all edits provide information about the editor's abilities, interests, and behavioral patterns. For example, the WWII edits indicate that Emiya1980 is willing to carefully follow clearly stated, objective rules to the letter. Remsense's comments here and elsewhere indicate that

11644:

I meant what I said above: if you feel people need to "take the fall" or write a page's worth of dialogue over a tiny incident, that's a you problem, and others really aren't required to follow your logic to its conclusion. What matters is that editors are able to work with each other, which I feel

10862:

It's very peculiar that no one, neither the OP nor the reported party, thought to point out that all of these RfC's have a common purpose--specifically, that they are all for the purpose of deciding on a lead image. So here's the thing--this is just one of those areas where the policy language is

10600:

But if the assessment at the beginning of this case is true, all of these RFCs have not resulted in any changes. So, I guess I would try to appeal to the fact that we all have limited amount of time we can work on this project and ask whether starting another RFC is a good use of your time and that

10575:

I confess to pushing the envelope with regards to publishing notices about Rfcs which I have opened or am otherwise involved. I also admit fault with regards to opening more than one or two Rfcs at a time. However, if more than a few editors are involved in a discussion and a decisive consensus has

9739:

There is a general agreement that, for some time now, there have been intermittent issues with Graham87's use of the block tool, and of issues with WP:INVOLVED. Graham87 has been admonished for doing so, and has agreed to work harder in the future to abide by the restrictions on admins using their

9574:

be evaluated on a procedural basis, as Graham87 reviewed himself and revoked talk page access. One other general note, I noticed that Graham87 has used the phrases "your editing pattern is highly suspicious" and "you are not welcome here" toward multiple editors whom he blocked for relatively mild

9489:

I'm not going to weigh in here in either direction as I closed the prior thread but I'm not sure what another ANI achieves when these are about blocks that happened before the prior thread. Were you hoping Graham would go through their past blocks and reassess? If you think it merits tool removal,

7711:

NO. I tried to give an hipotethical answers at the question you did. Another hipothethical answer is someone else has what (you) see as "similiar style". In additiopn: PC keep (remind) the passwords, so maybe I could just use two different accounts because one password is reminded by one PC and one

7660:

I do not know... but: in case, (it is ipothetical) I would have another house and I go there to eat and pass my other kind of time and maybe I created a second profile because I did not remind the password of the first account, would it be such a bad thing? It seems to me you are so curious to know

6193:

I did not alter the xenophobic note that he put in place of the figure, or the figures that were there before. I fixed them as they were being cited as medieval estimates, which nonsensical. I added additional numbers and actial primary sources because I am neutral as far as what had happened, but

5730:

For that matter, what’s to say this isn’t someone planning to make that draft up, then have a sock replace the existing article with the junk they’ve ripped? Maybe let’s not take that risk? This is, of course, in addition to the Copyvio notices they’ve removed, and AFC declines, that I pointed out,

5055:

HistoryofIran is a very hard working editor operating in an unbelievably difficult topic area. While doing that work they are consistently beset by uncivil ethno-nationalist POV pushers. HistoryofIran is fully deserving of the community's support and thanks. They shouldn't have to put up with being

3334:

You're hindering the discussion by not engaging with the points of site procedure and policy communicated to you by literally everyone who has engaged with you so far. You're not entitled to discussion on your terms alone, and there's no particular reason we care about "alternative perspectives" if

3001:

I think topic banning GDX420 from attempting to investigate or fix COI editing would be a reasonable step here, since a lot of the disruption seems to stem from their belief that this article is being edited by COI editors. They have had issues with lacking the competence to properly deal with paid

2583:

That misrepresentation of the source on the Pune rename is problematic for me. Its a false representation of information and straight up NPOV and incorrect rename of an article. Its more than that. I don't know enough about the area to call for a topic ban. A simple reading of the source, it states

1500:

Agree. This editor has been asked to provide summaries on the editor's talk page (twice by me), and has been told about the MoS, but has made multiple edits ignoring it despite warnings by other editors, all warnings without any result. This is especially problematic as the editor's edits are often

14042:

I've recently seen some TheNuggeteer's contributions and warnings they received. I personally wanted to weigh in and recommend them to step away from what they've been doing at GAN, though I ultimately didn't because of the lack of responses at previous warnings. Despite everything they've done, I

13318:

I am here after every alternative means of intervention has been exhausted and with extreme disappointment that it has come to this. TheNuggeteer is a newer editor who has been getting involved in several content processes and some administrative tasks. While without a doubt approaching their work

11805:

even when they are not required to. While doing so will not completely protect you from edit warring issues; and outside of areas where it's required, making 2 or 3 reverts doesn't mean you will definitely be blocked for edit warring; IMO it's a bad idea for any editor to think two reverts is okay

10904:

for this project. I would strongly urge you to not get within a kilometer of the kind of "Ok, time for you to shut up." style of statement to a fellow community member going forward. It was very hard for me to separate my thoughts about your decision to open the RfCs, as discussed above, from how

10729:

ready to throw anything he can at me to stop me from bucking his preferred version of the status quo, I need clarifications on what is acceptable and what is not (especially when dealing with guidelines as contradictory and open to interpretation as these). If you are not willing to provide me the

9933:

When you resume blocking, always watchlist the blockee's user page (or maintain a separate list of user pages to check every day). It's courteous, I think most admins do it, and for whatever reasons, a large percentage of people don't follow the instructions for filing an unblock request using the

8301:

Anyone have thoughts on whether this "garden of delights" is undisclosed paid editing, or just the garden-variety COI? The reason I ask is I've been tagging some of the articles as COI, but am wondering if PAID would be a better clean up tag to use. Many thanks to those who are already starting to

6614:

actually. The user conducted themselves in bad faith, not being assumed to. Again, explain yourselves, you who also aided them in their corruption of the article. The xenophobic note is contradicted by other sources; non-Arab, non-Muslim sources. Yet again this is omitted, censored, and obfuscated

6232:

Without evidence? What? How is removing numerical figures for a derogatory note acceptable ? Are all primary sources taboo on wikipedia now? Should all battles from antiquity, or even the modern era (as the figures from them too are contested) ought to be replaced by a concise offensive remark? By

5003:

HoI has been dealing with a constant barrage of harassment from POV-pushers in a highly contentious area of the Wiki for years. Their reports to ANI have been extremely on-point, and at this point deserve the benefit of the doubt. EducatedRedneck is correct, a lot of ethno-nationalist editors take

4988:

exists, but we also need another essay (if it doesn't exist) that we can't just let new editors come in and attack long-term editors with no consequence. That's a good way to lose long-term editors, too. For old-timers, I'm thinking of Malik. HoI does not need to accept attacks on his ethnicity

4971:

I'm sorry, I don't have time to dig too deeply into this. But I do agree that there are repeated personal attacks in there, and that the repeated claims that they're all just typos is untrue on its face, and that HoI does not need to just take them forever. I've left a warning at their talk page

4937:

Other comments, such as the "laughing while eating chips" one, come off as dismissive, implying that reaching a compromise is not Zemen's objective. I don't think an indefinite block is needed, but something should stop the disruption now and make it clear to Zemen that it will not be tolerated in

3533:

In the meantime, I kindly request that you and the concerned editors reconsider your stance and engage in a constructive dialogue through the RFC process. I believe that open communication and a willingness to participate are essential for resolving disputes and maintaining a collaborative editing

2943:

Honestly it seems like GDX420 is determined to just turn the entire article into a hit piece against the RNIB, and their edit history does show that perhaps they're a little too obsessed with doing so. Does the scandal have a place, yes it does. Does it deserve to override everything else and even

2681:

Since adding the content staff from the charity have contacted me via social media demanding my full name and address and when I refused to provide them with this information gangs of Police officers have been showing up at my house banging on my door in the middle of the night waking up the whole

1690:

was opened and failed. The editor bludgeoned folk there, was warned. The merge never got anywhere. The articles were then moved to Afd to get a better consensus. However, the editor is bludgeoning folk there as well, was warned at Afd, but still doing it which is stalling the discussion on them as

14163:

I have been watching this situation from a distance over the last week. At this time, I support a 6 month topic ban from participation in featured content assessment processes (e.g., DYK, GAN, FA, FL), broadly construed, at a minimum, based on the totality of what I have seen. Regardless of where

14014:). i mostly just want to encourage them to slow down and focus less on points or green circles and more on substantively improving articles without incentive. i also completely understand how nerve-wracking it can be to be taken to this board, and i appreciate the kindness shown here by everyone. 13707:

A good plan, I think. The open-ended nature of an indefinite ban would be extra stress for this particular editor, and would probably lead to unban requests that made everyone unhappy. I would broaden the topic ban to include contests as well, since I think they share the same perverse-incentives

12656:

Appreciate the guidance Liz. But to be fair, this IP has never once posted an edit summary in their extensive nearly 1000 edit history nor did they respond to the first templated warning from Peaceray and if you noticed on their talk page Wafflewombat had already appealed to them to explain their

11780:

Also, while warnings should primarily be intended to inform an edit so they change their behaviour and no further action is needed, because we don't generally block editors when they were genuine unaware they were violating our policies and guidelines the possibility a warning may be needed for a

9790:

I personally don't have confidence in this admin at all, unfortunately. Everyone makes mistakes, of course, but this is way, way beyond that. It is active, repeated and ongoing abuse of admin tools. I think an apology by Graham87 to some of the inappropriately blocked editors such as StattoSteven

9472:

I will endeavour to use more warnings than blocks from now on where feasible (it can be harder for IP and especially IPV6 users ... and in my experience many warnings are ignored, but that could be confirmation bias) ... and I'd forgotten there was a separate section of the blocking policy about

8406:

I agree with Liz that whether an individual belongs to a movement should be based on their own comments, rather than claims made by others. However, given the significant practical problems of sourcing such comments in Italian, and the very large number of articles involved, can I suggest that it

8344:

But then the fact that the ringleader was apparently the same in both 2015 and 2024, despite the fact the the 2015 campaign failed, makes me question that idea. Similarly the rather amateur nature of the activity, using someone with poor English skills and no understanding of Knowledge policy and

7988:

I think you'll have better results from filing an SPI (it's very straightforward, I've found) than trying to badger Gingeksace into an admission. A good faith explanation does exist: two editors with similar interests and different schedules. I'm dubious, hence why I think the SPI is a good idea.

7549:

It looks to me as though one end user has been editing the various articles as essentially a full time (and thus paid?) endeavour over the last 4 weeks, alternating between 2 different accounts. Either that or the activity is closely co-ordinated, which would strongly support the idea of COI/UPE.

4917:

First, HoI has a history of being taken here, typically by NOTHERE editors who don't like their reliance on scholarship. While I below may assume too much good faith, I by no means fault HoI for having exhausted theirs; they edit in a topic area prone to vitriolic nationalism, and I commend their

4397:

So does Zemen just get away with all their attacks, including in this report, where they have called me "childish" twice? Do you think that's okay? Is it allowed to attack users and engage in namecalling due to their perceived ethnicity? Two other users have called them out for their behaviour in

3911:

suggests a need to acknowledge the health claims without suggesting they are accepted. I didn't post it because (a) things quickly turned to whether curcumin = turmeric, an argument I didn't (and don't) understand, and (b) it was hard to frame it in a way that gave due weight to medref/profringe.

12470:, if you supplied a few diffs (I'd say between 3 and 8) of edits you were concerned about, rather than just listing accounts, you might get more of a response here. You need to point out the obvious rather than expecting editors to go looking for what the problems are. That's just my suggestion. 11793:

and has been blocked in the past for edit-warring, so I cannot see any way an admin would have let them be because they didn't know. I wasn't aware of all these details when I wrote my earlier comment but this very strongly re-enforces my point that if Remsense didn't know, a template was fairly

11699:

If you don't want your editing to be seen as problematic, I'd strongly suggest taking the feedback various editors have provided in this thread on board as this type of editing and the way in which you participate in related discussions (including this discussion) is not constructive or helpful.

9922:

suggests. It's become abusive at times. With an added problem that he isn't good at explaining to the user in plain English what they've been doing wrong (far from the only admin with that issue, but our PAGS can be counter-intuitive and our jargon can be hard to understand, and admins should be

9604:

I've deemed an editing pattern highly suspicious when it seemed like an editor was trying to get to autoconfirmed/extended-confirmed (perhaps for nefarious purposes) using minor edits to pad their edit count. My use of "you are not welcome here" has probably been rather harsh and I'll avoid that

8160:

Lots of articles all about Menotti Lerro etc., lots of socks all with indistinguishable interests and editing patterns. Ringleader seemed to be an account called Rainermaria27 who used poor English to express sentiments very similar to those expressed by Gingeksace above (e.g. rules breaches are

7839:

different accounts. E.g. when adding wikilinks one account consistently used the summary "underlined name" while the other consistently used the summary "highlighted name". However, you were given away by the fact that the two accounts were never online together and tagged each other in and out.

6727:

Go away man. You're neither interesting, nor worthwhile to me. I asked for arbitration, because you are clearly an oldhand at abuse of the system here and I did not want the article to remain corrupted. Enough terror tactics. How many Editors has this user scared offf wikipedia, followed by them

5604:

Following U5 deletion of their user page and deletion of the copyright-breaching image from Commons, they've recreated the page with a different copyright-breaching image. They still haven't responded on their talk page or here. Their creation still seems to be low-quality LLM copypasta to which

13840:

A thought occurs. If you like doing GA Reviews, what else would be up your street, on-wiki? Let’s find Nugget something else to do, that they’ll like. Preferably something that is easier to pick up, and less damaging if it goes wrong. If it’s the “reading long things” aspect, the COPYEDIT drive

9203:

I, for one, am concerned they (at least ostensibly) jumped to filing a court order after their AFC was denied, rather than discussing it. That's a tad more drastic than an ANI filing. Unlike a mere threat, which can be made in the heat of the moment, it indicates they are unlikely to back down.

7838:

As I said above, it would be the usual reason for sockpuppetry. i.e. passing yourself off as more than one end user. The deception in that regard between Gingeksace and Nihaon was actually quite subtle, including using two entirely different styles of language for the edit summaries for the two

7430:

Forgive me for the length of this report. I am bringing it here rather than to COIN because it’s an ongoing problem, and there have been efforts to resolve these issues, but the problems have recently escalated, and it seems that a type of "walled garden" has been created. These two editors are

11919:

The editor had already been approached and cautioned over the course of several weeks. I really wanted to avoid bringing this here. History suggests the editor does not get it and will not get it. It seems wasting community time with RFCs is more acceptable than I expected. Anyway, thanks for

10899:

That is not, however, to say that I see nothing wrong with Emiya's conduct inside the discussions after they have started. Emiya, let me be blunter than my diplomatic colleagues have been above: your conduct on the Mussolini article was so over the line that had there been even a single extra

6113:

User is conveniently again using selective quotations that suits their bias. "I included several references and citations, you did nothing but include a note by some guy. Ought I find some note about how worthless persian sources are." The charge of xenophobia is nonsensical as the xenophobic

4952:

Context is key when it comes to something along the lines of "Naturally a X would believe Y"... If Zemen was making a simple bias argument there is a way and a place to respectfully bring up a potential bias based on nationality or ethnicity... What Zemen absolutely can not do is use a real or

11759:

you seem to be making way too big a deal over the templated warning you received about edit warring. First a template warning isn't really a "reprimand", it's a warning that your behaviour, in the opinion of the person leaving the warning is violating our policies and guidelines and so if you

9942:

about new articles, suggesting they ask at the Teahouse, using short-term protection rather than repeatedly reverting, or asking at a noticeboard or on another admin's user talk (or, dare I suggest it, on Discord/IRC/e-mail) if you are at wit's end over something that seems, for example, like

8367:

I've looked at some of these articles and I think the claim that all of these scholars are part of this intellectual movement is tenuous and probably added to their articles and infoboxes by these socks. The primary source I've found to ascertain their "membership" is a publication of the the

6628:

omitted for that note? By their reasoning there is a far greater case to make for that. Not only is it similar in scope, not only are the parties involved named in that illustrious note, it lacks corroborating non-Greek sources for numbers involved to boot; unlike the situation here which had

5547:

The file's been tagged for copyvio speedy on Commons, so we might as well wait for that to happen since they keep restoring it. Obviously they saw the message about their talk page and decided to ignore it. I guess as long as they can't be disruptive in mainspace or add copyrighted content to

9506:

The previous thread (which I didn't participate in) was about a single bad block. Every admin makes an occasional mistake, I've made plenty. My digging showed that it looks to be a much larger issue, but realistically Arbcom is not going to accept a case, admonish, or yank the bit unless the

11889:

it appears that the community is willing to tolerate Emiya1980's commitment to wasting more valuable resource time on infobox image RFCs and is it pretty clear that the Emiya1980 sees no wrongdoing. So I guess this pointless crusade will continue. If that's the community's opinion so be it.

11768:

Anyway I have no idea why Nick-D chose to give you one but not one to Remsense but I can good reasons why it made sense and you've IMO proven the point on this thread. While you've been here for a while, it's apparent from what you've said and done in various places that you're still fairly

6146:

It's obvious that I cut parts of the quote to only highlight your attacks (hence the "...."), which is what is the point of this report. And by all means, please show the diff that says I rejected a source because it was by an Arab, because such diff doesn't exist. All I did was mention

2772:

You are underestimating how much information a dedicated person can find about a person online. One photo can compromise location, one shared username(or even email) could expose private accounts, email and some money is all that is necessary to reveal personal information collected by

6313:

does not support removing everything to suit xenophobic tendencies. And again they're the figures being used in modern scholarship, as elaborated in the talk page. What is this nonsense? In addition their ad hominem against my contributions are baseless, they actually resulted in a

3387:

I have attended to 1. modified RfC by changing the query 2. including the supplementary material and being prepared to include further supplementary materials till you cease gagging the process 3. and using every available method to allay the worries of any participating editors .

13587:

Well, I'm not sure I'd say you "deserved it", but you did have a lot of opportunities to get off this path, and you didn't take them. But it's going to be okay. Mostly what you've done is driven a bunch of people crazy, and we'll get over it. Let's find you something else to do.

2661:

I have created and maintained a section the the Charities Commission enquiry into, amongst other things sexual abuse of the charity's beneficiaries at an RNIB facility in Coventry. The content is supported by national news outlets considered reliable for contentious statements;

6552:. I have no interest in some racist xenophobe. How many Editors has this user scared off wikipedia, followed by them running around talking about how the grandeur of their contribution, how many contributions of higher value has their existence prevented by his terror tactics? 4635:

Focusing on my alleged ethnicity. I don't care what they claim, E and O are not even close to each other on the keyboard, it's not that hard to spell "Persian". "Porsian" is a not a word. Clearly, they meant "Poorsian" ("Poor-sian"), a common xenophobic remark against Persians.

11785:

and am also not an admin so I'm not familiar with what standards are nowadays, but I can reasonably see without the warning admins would have been reluctant to block you since you were genuinely confused what edit warning was and there had been no recent attempt to inform you.

9337:) looked especially unwarranted, as well as 8 IP blocks that were anywhere from 1-10 years that I shortened because I felt them excessive. There were several more that I thought were questionable but within reasonable admin discretion, so I left those alone. Graham87's response 4241:

Still don’t know which personal attack you guys accusing me of. he called my edits 'non-neutral', simply because I tagged his language and not the other, and I told him in return that your comments are 'too persian' not following wiki rules. What is there to accuse me of here?

10038:

A short aside re school blocks: I started blocking schools more aggressively after noticing that some IP's would have gaps of years in ther contributions, and figuring out that was due to long-term range blocks by other admins ... so I emulated and perhaps overextended those.

14203:

Could an admin please semi-protect talk:Hassan_Nasrallah for two days? The amount of IP vandalism and disruption, much of it openly racist and derogatory, is at levels I've never seen. I requested at RfPP but the backlog there is very heavy and urgent action would be needed.

11456:

I hold you responsible only for your part of the edit war. You did not believe that you were involved in an edit war. I have explained that there really was an edit war underway. Your part in the edit war might be smaller, but that doesn't mean that there was no edit war.

2260:, before this discussion snowballs into sanctions, can you stop participating in these identified AFDs? I'm sure you have already made your opinions known at this point. But this step would be a start in curbing some of your behavior which has been identified as problematic. 2686:

to whitewash their reputation, mislead their donors and keep their Royal charter by any means neccessary. What steps can be taken to de-escalate this matter while preserving the article's independense and objectivity? What legal rights do I have as a content creator on this

10282:. Happymappy took to continuing to reinstate their unsourced additions, as well as disrupt Willondon's user and talk pages. Happymappy has created a very obvious sock account, called Happymappy123, seemingly to get around their p-block on Carlisle Public Schools imposed by 8348:

So on balance I would conclude it was someone close to Lerro, or otherwise involved in his movement, but perhaps not paid specifically for this work (for which they were evidently unsuited). Maybe it was an agent who was doing this as well as other non-wiki related duties.

4612: 10845:

situation. This maybe goes hand-in-hand with an increasingly "legalistic" approach to Knowledge, especially among newer editors: they want a case and they want a ruling and they want precedent. I really wish there was something the community could do to tamp down on this.

5048:

That sort of false equivalence is, I'd suggest, really quite offensive. Anybody being racially abused, in any walk of life, clearly has an absolute right to file a report and for that report to be taken seriously. To imply that raising such a report is itself an abuse is

8402:

Most of the BLP articles listed at the top of this thread contain a sentence in the lede along the lines of "is an adherent of the Empathic movement". The relevant sentence always(?) seems to be cited to a webpage for the book mentioned by Liz, which includes a list of

5704:. Not building the encyclopedia, not collaborating, not communicating, not respecting copyright in images, previously inserted errors and copyright-violating text into articles, repeatedly made nonsense AfC submissions, all despite many messages and warnings. Enough. 4925:

The "Porsian" comment is suggestive, but I've seen weirder typos happen. Given Zemen's imperfect grasp of English, I don't think it's beyond the pale to suggest it could have been an honest mistake. Similarly, the "childish" exchange I could chalk up to translation

7630:

Please explain how Gingeksace and Nihaon have the same editing style and agenda, but are never editing on Knowledge at the same time, and can frequently be seen to tag one another in and out through the course of a single day. You operate both accounts, don't you?

3881:

If my logic is satisfactory here: if a single other editor was to indicate they would've done anything but oppose in that RfC, then I was totally in the wrong to close it, and would naturally more seriously reconsider my future calculus with this incident in mind.

15803:

I apologized for the inaccuracies in the editing summaries. I promise that I would be more specific in future editing summaries to avoid misperceptions of them being "misleading", but I do hope that the phrasing of any reminders on my Talk page can be improved.

4929:

Even discounting those, there remains a core of incivility which should be addressed. The biggest one is the focus on nationality; I'd expect anyone who said, "Of course a Mexican would think X" or "Naturally a Czech would believe Y" would get a swift block for

13790:, I agree with you that it would help with familiarizing one with GA, FA, or FL criteria, but at the moment I don't feel comfortable letting them proceed without the guidance of mentors, which to me is a less destructive alternative than independent reviewing. 2800:

on the platform, there is nothing much we can do. Even if there is, it would likely result in a block on that account making the threat. As for your offline personality being known, there's nothing much we can do. You may have to seek legal advice on your own.

1515:

This editor has never replied to any messages on their Talk page, so I have to assume that they have never read them. They probably don't even realize that anyone is sending them messages. I'm not sure how to contact them in another way to get their attention.

10061:

User:DanielTokenhouse has made persistent controversial edits to various articles implying that the subjects harbour Anti-English/British sentiment or to question whether or not they are English, British or Irish. Most of these edits are without any sources.

7587:

As far as I can see that post is an obvious tacit confession of what is going on here. Otherwise why would a non-COI editor suggest that COI concerns are irrelevant if the subject is notable and that in their opinion there should be far more latitude on COI

4260:, placing notices like the ones you've received is a very normal thing that editors do here, to give some explanation for why they are reverting another user's edits. You need to be able to receive these notices without perceiving them as personal attacks. @ 6503:

then and add that note instead. Why the double standards? I left the note, added nuance. They removed nuance. I added non-Arab sources which are used by modern historians, and they still removed it. Ibn Khaldun already did the work "modern" historians do.

9422:

for some of the blocks is remarkably childish. "I raised it to five years because they complained that three years was too long". I hate spammy editors as much as anyone but the block of MarcArchives00 was an utter abuse of power. It also appears Graham87

9866:

Having attempted to deal with the oldest of the appeals a few weeks ago, which was extremely time consuming and led to a quick burnout, I want to say that I saw many of your comments at the appeals and found them thoughtful and helpful. So thank you.--

5023:

dispute with, even if they're dicks. (For one thing, if you remain calm and they nevertheless double down on being a dick, it's very easy to tell that the issue is, indeed, that they're not the slightest bit interested in building an encyclopedia.) --

15077:

Indefinitely blocked by Bbb23 for being a solely self-promotional account. For the record, one should note that the shoehorn is in fact a very comfortable and easy item to use -- it is unfairly besmirched by the comparison to this editor's behavior.

10026: 9520:

Thank you for lifting that block, The Wordsmith. I came across them when I deleted that draft and they had such a brief contribution history, I didn't see anything blockable. As for sanctions, in my limited experiences, cases like this are posted on

5116:, what I was talking about was the behaviour on the talk pages, not the act of bringing the question to ANI. I see that's not fully clear from my original post, and I'm happy to apologize for that, and for describing the behaviour as "bullying". -- 1974:

I welcome new users when I have time to do so. Also being a user with over 5000 edits, it would be very dumb of me to think that this welcoming of users will "bury" my edit history. The welcoming of users is done as my everyday interest and nothing

11714:

If I'm being singled out for an incident where blame is clearly shared by another editor, there is nothing wrong with me pointing out. Your willingness to turn a blind eye to Remsense's part in said edit war clearly shows your bias in this matter.

3769:

You really ought to be WAY less combative if you want to collaborate with other people. If things worked like your template warnings would lead us to believe there would be very few editors left that didn't get blocked. This isn't the way to go. –

2709:. The article's "independence" and objectivity does not now seem to be at stake. As far as what dealings you and your family might have with UK law enforcement, that's not part of Knowledge's remit, nor does the WMF have any authority over that. 9923:

explicators first, and it's always best to avoid the block. And I see both in the discussion above and in the user talk examples cited here and at Wikipediocracy, Graham87 getting frustrated. And trying again and again in the same vein of comment.

9455:

on the basis they had engaged in overlinking in their first edits and hadn't been on here in a while and didn't immediately request an unblock). What's the point of the unblock process if such an obviously inappropriate block is allowed to stand?

9880:

I've tried to be at least mildly helpful when I can be. I figure any question that I or another editor can field is one less thing to deal with for you or Yamla or 331dot or any of the others. I know what a workload it is for you and the others.

7868:

Unfortunately the attempt to make the two accounts look different by using different forms of edit summaries gave you away. How could that possibly have happened other than intentionally, and what possible intent could there have been except to

1794:

My intent was never to be aggressive or dominate, the intent was to clear misunderstandings and nothing else as most users may not be aware of how Indian Power Sector is structured or work, so yeah, let us let the closer evaluate the consensus.

11772:

By comparison Remsense is experienced enough that they really should know what edit warning is, and their responses seem to have been much more accepting of their mistakes than you further re-enforcing this PoV. While there's also debate about

9734: 9681:(which is how I found them ... and isn't in any sort of tutorial) set off alarm bells. I knew that asking for me to review their unblock request probably wasn't what they meant but by then their general evasiveness was getting to me. And they 3736:

situation. Very strange that DwilfaStudwell's fourth edit was to template warning an experienced user. Now this user is opening up a discussion here. This doesn't seem like a editor who is here to improve the project or work well with others.

11071:(I also did two reverts. I revert twice and thrice much more than I'd like, I will admit. I think I'm at my worst when I revert twice and thrice without being particularly communicative or helpful, and I could've been better here I guess.) 10730:

answers I want, you can at least point me in the direction of a page or forum where I can find others who are. If you are sincere in wanting me to be a more constructive part of Knowledge, you should have no problem doing this much for me.

2163: 2117: 2081:

I reviewed all of them and before-hand and nominated for merger. I'm not aware of WP:WELCOMING, now I am. Pune airport name change did occur and citations can be found too in the article, I added more than 1 citation regarding name change.

11404:

happen so that might be something for the admins to look into because I don't know how that happened. Back to the matter at hand, one of the edits which you are referring is a notice I posted at the top of the page indicating the lede for

10462:

a valuable part of the project and this doesn't appear to be a productive use of it. Perhaps I’m overreacting, so I’m presenting this here for comment. If the community believes this is a productive use of resources, I’ll drop it. Thanks!

1593:

general editing area, broadly construed. A reminder to Thewikizoomer that this topic-ban applies to the individual, not the account, and any attempt to start editing with a new account to evade this sanction will see that account blocked.

13866:

over their first review back before final decisions are made. I know this creates extra work for others but personally I’m more than happy to take on this extra responsibility and I think it would be beneficial for everyone in involved.

2458: 10069:

The user has changed the ethnonyms on the articles for Johnny Marr, Kirsty MacColl, Andy Farrell, Liam Farrell, Owen Farrell, Steve Coogan, John Squire and Ian Brown, to state they are Irish, without any source stating they identify as

15516:) has repeatedly made minor edits (Changing a month to the following month, for future planned events) without reference. He has been told not to on his talk page. This behavior is essentially the entirety of the user's contributions. 10521:. Now, please respond in detail to other editor's concerns about your use of the RFC process. Do you have a good understanding of the circumstances when an RFC is the best solution, as opposed to situations when less dramatic forms of 9676:

I've gone and done the unblock and we'll see what happens. The Indian entrepreneur bit of their user page (the combination of the two, because it seems to be a hotspot of paid editing) plus their tendency to make very minor edits like

9235:

Having taken a quick look at the article in question, I'd have to suggest that at least some of the complaints about it may be entirely legitimate. It appears to include, amongst other things, unsourced allegations of rape and murder.

7952:

If you read again all you will find the answer... I talked about the possibilities at your question... But if to tell you one reason will mean to have attacks on me I prefer you immagine by yourself which of that possibilities ragards

11764:

their warning was just a typical editor to editor warning, it wasn't an admin saying they'd block you if you continued down that path. So if it came to it, any blocking would have considered the behaviour of all involved as relevant.

8340:

The number of times that the same ambitious plan has been put into action, affecting more than one version of Knowledge, suggests it was paid, as does the sheer amount of time that was being spent in creating and developing so many

4308:. I did read that talk page before making my initial comment, and I think you would have gotten much further with more patience. Please try to work things out, rather than further provoking editors who are already clearly upset. -- 7872:

It did occur to me at one point earlier today that I must be looking at two different people taking turns using the same computer - but obviously if it had been something as innocent as that you would have said it a long time ago.

7564:

One other thing, I note that when directly questioned on COI the user Gingeksace has responded along the lines of (and I paraphrase) “never mind about the COI, just concentrate on whether Lerro is notable or not”, for example here

4514:

What do you want from me now?? I wouldn't lie to anyone to do it for you, you apparently know nothing about the ADVKu keyboard recommendation system. Plus I didn't call you childish, but your thoughts and accusations are childish.

2876:

And really, it's not believable at all. Only in lurid fiction and tabloid fantasies can one find omniscient charities who can mobilize squads of brownshirts at the drop of an utterly unremarkable username. We're being BSed here.

1675: 13932: 7591:

Over the last 3 years the user has made 761 edits to the article for Menotti Lerro and 392 edits to the article for Empathism, as well as making a further c.2,000 edits to other Lerro-related articles (most of which they created

3916:

I doubt I'd ever have gotten to the point of agreeing with the RFC (whatever it was supposed to mean). There were good reasons to believe that conversation wouldn't go anywhere, but closing the discussion guaranteed it wouldn't.

3178:

My apologies, seriously: I should've been far less impulsive, and more willing to listen to the type of editor that can pick up all this lingo and knowledge of site procedure over the course of 30 edits made in less than a day.

11427:

I see one reversion (though edit warring isn't limited strictly to reversions) by you and three by another editor. That's one bold edit plus four reversions within 72 minutes, which is easily into the edit warring territory.

11167:

is an issue I consider worthy of continued debate. If the sticking point to my continued involvement in said discussion is that I presented no reliable sources in support of my argument, then I am more than willing to provide

6181:

judge for yourselves. I even asked for arbitration, but the user here did not relent. The user appears to be the xenophobic here, using personal affiliation as bases. I have no knowledge of his person to base that on anything.

5867:

No kidding. I'm not going to act on Liz's warning, since I can't find the vandalism she's talking about, but I hope one of that editor's next edits is an apology and not more inventively rude vandalism, for their own sake. --

4033:

Focusing on my alleged ethnicity again. E and O are not even close to each other on the keyboard, it's not that hard to spell "Persian". Clearly, he means "Poorsian" ("Poor-sian"), a common xenophobic remark against Persians.

3668:, it is pretty evident that even a new RFC (even with more sources) wouldn't yield any different result. Remsense isn't abusing the system, your RFC was soundly rejected and the responses on it explain pretty well why it was. 10620:, consider yourself formally warned for your suboptimal conduct regarding RFCs and I urge you to behave appropriately regarding RFCs in the future. You have used up your assumption of good faith in this area, so be cautious. 9740:

tools in disputes where they could be considered substantially involved. At this point, no formal sanctions are enacted, without prejudice to opening a new case some time in the future should problems of this nature persist.

15692:"You want to use a closed chat that only validates your pov-pushing. We always bring you more sources which prove that your presuppositions are erroneous but you fall back on them with the principle of not changing anything. 3083:

The police banged on your door in the middle of the night, didn't bring any tools to forcibly enter, just left after waking up the entire street, and then went to your parents' house to ... mosey around? Pull the other one.

15850:

My intention is to clean up the article, keeping relevant content as precise as possible, i.e. reducing redundancy, while adding content that can provide more information related to subsections with which it is associated.

10990:

seems another example of this, where Emiya1980 has in the last 24 hours or so started an edit war and dispute on a much debated topic in an overwise stable and high profile article based purely on their personal views (see

7823:

Sorry, it was not you "mocking" indeed. But anyway that was very bad behaviour... About myself, I did not do any abuse, what would be the reason for me to do that when I could with a single account? Anyway... All the best

9639:

when the user was apparently being receptive of advice and I don't see anything in their recent contributions to warrant such a quick block, especially since they ceased editing mainspace after the "really weird feeling"

3319:

I respectfully request that you reconsider your inadvertent reversal. It appears to be hindering open discussion on the talk page. Please allow the community to thoroughly explore alternative perspectives on this matter.

1738: 9934:

template that puts their page in the category. And anyone can make a mistake; with the best will in the world, an admin will sometimes make a block that, after reading what the blockee has to say, they decide to reverse.

12162:

into articles that have no corresponding references. I was patiently leaving warning messages at all these IP pages, but apparently they either don't see them or ignore them. I guess it is time to start issuing blocks.

7776:

Let me say even for a bank robbery there are not so many ivestigations and strong wish to prove something pretty seconday in all this. But I understood it is your main interest in all this. It is fine than. Cheers! :-)

4101:

and I'm against it, I didn’t even know what you meant that time. All that aside, why is "good that you understood your purpose. good look" a bad thing? btw it's my talk page, laughing or eating chips, not your problem.

13327:

in meeting community standards. They have received numerous warnings from numerous editors, most of which received no response, acknowledgment of error, or commitment to improvement. Below are the most recent of them.

6667:

I'm actually here to add that the reason why that note isn't inplace of every single Greco-Persian battle instead of figures is because they have more eyes on them, hence corrupting the article wouldn't be as tenable.

2412: 15236: 9549:

I've skimmed through all of the accounts blocked by Graham87 over the last six months. I only took a brief look, and many of them are routine, but a few stood out. I ask that an uninvolved admin review the blocks of

2791: 15750:"Once again you select the information from the articles that suit you without explaining the concepts which is a misappropriation of sources.... These diversions of sources and these tinkerings are not encouraging" 12432: 12376: 4286:. The worst of these attacks is no doubt "Poorsian", which is just xenophobic and has no place on this site, yet they clearly don't care. I have already tried to work out stuff with them, such as the afromentioned 3595:

While it's frustrating to respond to, I am sympathetic to people who might have limited comfort writing in English and might be apprehensive about it, or think the LLM or machine translation is smarter than it is.

14274: 12320: 9363: 5041:. I agree with The Hand That Feeds You, that was an appalling comment to make in response to an editor rightly reporting being repeatedly attacked, especially as some of the attacks were clearly on ethnic grounds. 3775: 3682:

I've done things like close RFCs where I was pretty sure I was right and someone else disagreed. As such, I got reverted and life goes on. That isn't happening here, because no one else agrees with your premises.

1501:

reverted or are otherwise problematic. Although the editor has been editing for only a year, the editor has over 3,000 edits and should have attended to his talk page warnings and stopped disruptive edits by now.

9937:

You've been promising to be nicer, but also try to be clearer. In particular, explain more from the start, and change tacks if the person isn't getting it. That could include linking to simpler explanations like

2727:

In terms of due weight. I mean, it's difficult to balance the POV when the secondary coverage of the scandal outweighs anything they've done before or since with the possible exception of election accessibility.

15359: 10835:

says "RfCs are time consuming, and editor time is valuable". RfCs are a heavyweight process which should only really be used when other, less time-intensive, methods have failed. Unfortunately there seems (e.g.

3547:

I have secondary sources to support my claim, and I would like the opportunity to properly present the RFC. I believe that the RFC process is a valuable tool for resolving disputes and ensuring that WP:NPOV are

7906:

Denying it is no good, because it can be demonstrated that that was indeed happening. In the absence of a plausible explanation the only possibility is that you created the two accounts with intent to deceive.

4736:

If anyone is getting "bullied" and should be "upset" that is me. I tire of constantly being attacked due to my background by new users with barely any edits and who ultimately end up getting indeffed for being

1820:— I find Thewikizoomer's behaviour to be very problematic, for example they responded to scope_creep's comments with the exact same comment beginning with "Oppose merge all" in bold despite them already voting 7902:

I want to be entirely fair here, so I'll give you another chance. Can you explain why the two accounts were never online at the same time and used different edit summaries to make them look like different end

7645:

Also, for the sake of transparency, this would be a good opportunity for you to clarify what your connection is to Lerro. Let's be honest, you aren't just someone who once asked him for some photos, are you?

3519:

Unfortunately, due to my current travel schedule, I am unable to devote the necessary time to further escalate this matter at present. However, I intend to follow up on this issue as soon as possible upon my

15231: 14631: 9372:

This seems like a prelude to an ARBR request (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, Wordsmith). After reading through Graham87's talk page, the previous ANI thread, and the WPO thread, I would support such.

4146:

Everything you say is nonsense, look I can tell you so. If you think everything I say now and in the future is 'nonsense' why don't you try to avoid me? why do you keep replying? you're almost bothering me.

2944:

delete general information from the lead, absolutely not. I'd suggest GDX420 is outright blocked from the page and everyone else gets involved in resetting it and rebalancing the article and removing undue.

775: 15757:"You are appropriating the Knowledge article and preventing any improvement of the article... you are not reasonable in your way of interacting with other contributors and preventing them from contributing" 14122:

As someone who has been involved in this often the person in question wouldn’t be very communicative and often didn’t respond to talk page messages or would just not seem to take other advice on the topic.

11645:

I'm perfectly capable of on that article going forward if you are: if there's anything here others need to worry about, it would be the longer-term patterns of behavior that said tiny incidents constitute.

6332:

Proving that you seem unable to interact in a consructive manner with editors who disagree with you, unable to stick to comments about the topic rather than editors and, last but not least, unable to avoid

1691:

well. I'd like a couple of weeks of clear discussion so it can come to a consensus without interference. The editor has made his point clearly in all three Afds. Can somebody have a chat with the editor.

15303:) I suspect an unnamed editor who recently argued with me is behind this IP address, but since I have no proof, I'm hoping something can be done to the IP for this personal attack/harassment. Thank you. — 12426: 12398: 12370: 12286: 12230: 11016:

so this feels a draconian application of the edit-war ban; especially considering I consented to the reverting editor's recommendation for a discussion after being reverted only twice. Most significantly,

740:

Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are

13102:

Well, I was "forgiven" for posting a warning notice to their User talk page earlier this month. Looking into this point of disagreement, I'm wondering if there is any connection between SinisterUnion and

10066:

For the articles of Rich Peppiatt, Steve Coogan, Miriam Margolyes and John Oliver, they have implied they have renounced their British citizenship without any source, which has been reverted in all cases.

6633:, and the reason why we are having this conversation here in the first place. Instead of letting the reader judge for themselves, the users here act as censors to tell the reader what they ought to think. 12342: 12314: 12258: 7887:

ok, I see and now I understand a bit. Yes if I would have used two accounts on a same PC changing like that sistematically it would be very intentionally. I can confirm I did not do it. Have a nice day.

4750: 2418:

issues and is causing alot of problems in ARBIPA topic area. Therefore, I propose that Thewikizoomer be topic banned from all articles related to ARBIPA (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan) broadly construed.

806: 801: 15784:. The User has been warned that this is misleading before. When I tried to inform them that this was not an acceptable edit summary, I was told that I was not assuming good faith and further accused of 11777:, this does seem a definite case where a simple "cut out the edit warring" message was sufficient for Remsense if need be but an attempt to explain the problem even if via a template to you made sense. 6131:

Even non-Arab sources were rejected for this user to suit their bias. Even if those primary sources were cited by people being cited in the main article. And I don't even know if the user is Persian or

15354: 10147:, surely a highly contentious claim, and they provided no reference to a reliable source. Worth noting is that Peppiatt apparently still lives in the UK, in Belfast. Similarly with the far more famous 7762:. They all have the same editing pattern of making large numbers of small edits minutes apart over periods of perhaps an hour or two. It's obviously not credible that these are all separate end users. 5419:

That was after I blocked them, and if they haven't gotten any of their talk page messages, they won't have much reason to understand why their user page spontaneously evaporated in the first place. --

9277: 695: 9027: 4859: 1530:

With my talk page warnings I also pinged the editor. I don't think we can assume he's not reading them versus the editor is just ignoring them. Also, the editor hasn't learned from repeated reverts.

15818:

I will withdraw this, but misleading edit summaries are disruptive by nature, and when someone warns you, its best not to accuse them of "wikilawyering" when they bring evidence to support a claim.

9316:) he had made back in February 2024. I checked and it seemed to be a completely unfounded block based on "padding his edit count" by doing the tutorial that we show to new users plus a deleted stub 11737:. They admit that their behavior wasn't ideal, and they're working on ideas to improve. We don't need to make a big deal out of it, because they've already said everything that needs to be said. 8710: 5461:

Whilst it may, theoretically, be misuse of their user page why not put a message there, referring to the discussions and user:talk warnings - at least we know (assume?) they read their user-page.

3204:

Thank you for acknowledging your error. The Request for Comments has been reopened, and additional secondary sources have been incorporated. I invite you to participate in the renewed discussion.

2848:

And thirded. I have never seen the UK described like that, except by very ignorant people from other countries who were disappointed that I didn't know Prince Charles (as he then was) personally.

14944: 10157:

No, he publicly renounced his British citizenship. He’s stated on more than one occasion he’s ashamed of his association with the “shithole” country and never wants to be associated with it again

3581:

shows lack of respect for the people you're addressing. You don't even seem to be giving it sensible instructions ("Thank you for your attention to this matter.") Stop it before you're blocked.

2121: 2038: 1846: 9320:

that looked promotion-ish but hardly worth a block without discussion. I lifted the block and left a message on Graham's talkpage, then went back and checked all his blocks from September 2024.

6277:

Apparently the user is unable to use actual words, again utilising wiki interface as their weapon of misuse. And those citations aren't poor, they're all we have. The user is being ridiculous.

5052:

You've made a serious error of judgement and it would be better if you were to acknowledge that fact and apologise, rather than seeking to reframe your involvement in a positive light, as above.

13532: 10839: 9966:

and I think studying the ones around my position (#40 for now) seems like the best approach ... and seeing how many people do indeed come back after a block (zero on a quick check of blocks by

6124:"According to Daryaee, "Islamic texts usually report the number of the Persian soldiers to have been in the hundreds or tens of thousands and several times larger than the Arab armies. This is 4264:, you need to be able to assume good faith and try to work things out more thoroughly before threatening other editors with ANI. If they're a sockpuppet, they'll step on a rake soon enough. -- 4770:, not even bothering to read the Safavid Kurdistan article, which does not support Zemens replacement, as the Kurdistan province did not extend that far. Go on, say that I am "bullying" them. 4496:

Feel free to explain how my "interpretations" are not good and what this so called "system" is, and what "Porsian" means, since it's not a synonym for Persian. I've given you more than enough

1870: 15043:, and unlikely to cause disruption anywhere else, an SPI would be an unnecessary drain of editorial and administrative resources for no meaningful benefit when page protection is sufficient. 13253: 2142: 13986:(GAN, FAC, PR, etc). i want to emphasize to TheNuggeteer that everyone here wants the best for both you and the encyclopedia. de-stubbing sounds like a great way to continue contributing :) 7741:

It doesn't really matter what the reason is, it is still sockpuppetry. However, the real reason for the multiple accounts is presumably to allow you to make statements like this one, above,

4934:. I'm willing to extend AGF to its breaking point and accept that Zemen was alluding to a common argument, but even so it needs to be made clear that they must comment on edits, not editors. 11386:

The first two edits don't show a change in the flag size. They only show you copying the whole line (carefully preserved in their original form, with no changes at all) to a new location.

8700: 6647:

Are you done constantly tweaking your comment? Most readers aren't going to see all the changes you've made to it over the last 24 hours. Please stop constantly reviewing and altering it.

4398:

this report, whilst you haven't told them anything. Facing no repercussions from their actions, they will no doubt continue, especially as they clearly think their behaviour was justified.

3561:

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I respectfully request that the administrators intervene to ensure that the RFC is restored and that a fair and equitable resolution is reached.

9791:

would have been an start of acknowledging that was has happened is unacceptable. At the absolute bare minimum, Graham87 should no longer be blocking editors or reviewing unblock requests.

9386:; part of me still hopes for it. Given the response, either Graham's sense of when to block is far outside community norms or mine is so I'm not sure it can be avoided one way or another. 9116:

in a very short time, deleting old reliable sources and including bare URLs to questionable sources. User has received multiple warnings for this same behaviour on this same page in 2012.

15254: 13009:

I wonder if they are the same person, creating an illusion of a group, since they coincidentally want to improve the same articles about FIFA and football. We'll see if any socks appear.

8705: 8050:

This walled garden is full of some of the wordiest least penetrable articles ever put on Knowledge. It seems the only reason these articles haven't been instantly deleted is because of a

9135: 3506:. Despite multiple attempts to resolve this issue through Talk Page discussions and the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (ANI), I have been unable to reach a satisfactory resolution. 11409:

was too long. For the record, I do in fact think the lede is unnecessarily detailed and contains two bloated paragraphs which could use some trimming. Again, however, I am only seeing

8784: 7431:

involved in what appears to be an orchestrated effort to promote Menotti Lerro & Empathism and their associates. Efforts were made to resolve the issues, see Gingeksace’s talk page

6770: 5958: 4350:

may be confused, or ignorant, or rude), you should try again. Engaging further right now, and getting into arguments on each other's user talk pages, is just going to make both of you

2862:

It would be more believable if one comes from a smaller country like myself, but even then, I wouldn't know everyone in this 42km-long island, neither do I expect everyone to know me.

11100:, I actually reverted Remsense only once during the incident in question. The original change I made to the infobox should not be counted as a reversion for purposes of edit-warring. 10139:

Although it would have been nice for the OP to have provided diffs, it only took a few minutes examining DanielTokenhouse's edits to see severe problems. For example, they wrote that

8911:

No worries. I am suspicious of non-standard domains as well as things get shady really fast with some TLDs. You could easily replace the .co with the .com and have it all still work.

8518: 7759:

accounts operating in the same topic area over the last 18 month can be seen by looking for the redlink users in the contribution history for Cilento International Poetry Prize, here

7743:

In the Movement there are also young artists and cultured, passionate people and maybe ONE, TWO or THREE OF THEM WANTED TO MAKE THIS EFFORT to tell to the world also through Knowledge

4648:

Yeah, what I expected, these words, I know what you want, on the pretext of 'Knowledge rules' (which I respect much) exactly what you don't want to see: 'Kurd' why don’t you go get ]?

4046:

Yeah, what I expected, these words, I know what you want, on the pretext of 'Knowledge rules' (which I respect much) exactly what you don't want to see: 'Kurd' why don’t you go get ]?

2988:

I hadn't seen that particular edit-summary and on that alone I have partially blocked GDX420 from the article. If I'd seen it at the time, that block might well have been site-wide.

6107: 6089:

I don't care who you are. I don't know who you are. I'm saying what your actions are doing. You are the hyper emotional one here, using clunky wiki interface as your weapon of abuse.

15377: 13385: 2792:

https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/training/support-and-safety/dealing-with-online-harassment-communication-best-practices/what-kind-of-support-can-the-wikimedia-foundation-offer

13976: 7542:

Looking at the Menotti Lerro article I noticed that although both of the users spend a lot of time there editing over extended periods they never seem to be there at the same time.

2962:"I believe the article's subject is weaponising the Online Safety Act 2023 to whitewash their reputation, mislead their donors and keep their Royal charter by any means neccessary" 13371: 8410:

Any comments on Empathism further down in the articles would obviously need to be treated on their merits, which in some cases may influence retaining the sentences in the lede.

6604: 15770: 15546: 13958: 12836: 12545:), disrupting existing reference/footnotes, widespread superfluous and disruptive cosmetic edits which, among others, include removing spaces, proper punctuation (violations of 6155:

is a historian (he doesn't use the word "worthless" either, more made up stuff), you're not - we base our info on academic sources, as you've already been told when I mentioned

15722:"Please do not delete the name in one of the official languages of the country (reiteration of pan-Arabist pov). This mention is present on the pages in French, Spanish, etc" 8465: 3779: 2401:

when this board is exactly for highlighting a user's problematic behaviour. And that he is still continuing to misrepresent sources in order to defend his disruptive page move.

13097: 10014: 9367: 8616: 8559: 7599:

seems obvious. There is clearly something wrong when the connection has gone undeclared in over 3 years (and 3,000+ edits) despite various attempts to ask them to declare COI.

5934: 4460:

Claiming "Porsian" ("Poorsian") is a "typo", which I find it hard to believe, when O and E are not even close to each other, how could the "system" possibly change those two.

750: 728: 15195: 12896:, One of them just requested that an ArbCom case be opened against me. This is more than WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior, from what I am seeing. They're just harrasing people now. 10703:

more specifically. It is also your obligation to fully take on board the legitimate concerns that other editors have raised about your RFC conduct. My warning is by no means

6590:: The reported editor seems unable to engage in a constructive manner when they have a disagreement with another editor, they comment on editors, not the topic and they make 4227:. Nobody 'deserves' incivility. If you wish to make amends, I suggest that you strike through the personal attacks and do not make any more. Would you be willing to do that? 15797: 15242: 7449: 7351: 6987: 12701: 9377: 8471:

I think they need to be nominated one-by-one, because there is the potential (and in at least one case actuality) of claims of notability unrelated to the promotionalism. —

8074: 1494: 1472: 15970: 15685:"However, it was formulated on an erroneous basis that the name in Amazigh has no standardization which is a lie given the existence in the APS and in certain ministries." 12438: 12410: 12382: 12298: 12242: 8226: 4585:, Im glad you wrote this comment in this way, thank you very much for letting me know that my goal was not achieved properly, thanks again! I will try to improve on this. 2462: 2420: 11255:

on said page regarding the infobox issue which (as I've already indicated) is what happened here. Assuming you are characterizing my original change to the infobox as an

9742:

This has only further convinced me that every time an ANI discussion is closed without action, it's tacit permission to continue whatever behavior was being scrutinized.

2637: 15989: 12680: 12354: 12326: 12270: 10022:

OK, I'll watchlist talk pages of people I do block (not always possible for IP ranges though, obviously). Sometimes I do find their requests when checking contributions.

9359: 7207: 3771: 1772:

You're literally aggressively responding to every single comment, sometimes multiple times. These links read like you're clearly trying to dominate the conversation per

15910: 13445: 10030: 8311: 15365: 13908:(review, with assistance from IntentionallyDense, although he has said onwiki and offwiki he would appreciate another pair of eyes due to the subject's medical nature) 10167:

Accordingly, I have indefinitely blocked this editor for BLP violations and also for persistent additions of unsourced content, POV pushing, and tendendtious editing.

9352: 8722: 3061:

and changed its name to The National Institute for the Blind, or NIB, to reflect its status as a national body involved in all aspects of the welfare of blind people.

2428: 1683: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 962: 14525:

I am kind of confused. From what I can see on their profile I don’t think they are an evader. Or did they edit their profile? I can see a decent edit made by them on

13332: 5605:

they're adding citations of unacceptable sources, and we already have a better article. It seems as if they're just using the user page to play at making an article.

4089: 1905:, I can't see this as anything other than an attempt to bury their edit history in order to avoid scrutiny. I would also like to state that Thewikizoomer is aware of 15187: 13954: 11230:

says Emiya "started an edit war"; Emiya's response is basically to claim that there was no violation of 3RR. Both of these statements can be true at the same time.

8407:

would be best for the claims to just be removed from each of the articles? At the end of the day the relevant sentences in the ledes are perhaps best viewed as spam.

7231: 6255:, that does not make a xenophobe, using my "personal afflilation", "using clunky wiki interface as a weapon of abuse", or any of your other accusations. As for your 1737:

If anything is undesirable here, that is trying to create hostility by using words such as "one more comment and I'll take you to WP:ANI" like an involved user said

1679: 13357: 12114: 9451:, intended for "significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy") and disappointingly the unblock request was twice declined (first by 7529: 7517:

E qui si precisa, ugualmente a gran voce, che le speculazioni armate ad arte dall’indomito teatrante, palesano ulteriormente una pomposa esaltazione ben conosciuta.

6485:

to me, as described. (Note that in the example I said was acceptable, the ancient historian's statement is immediately answered by one from a modern historian.) --

2575: 15868:, writing false edit summaries is a form of disruptive editing, which can lead to blocks. Consider yourself warned, and always be truthful in your edit summaries. 9317: 1687: 237: 11218:

means "more than once"; it does not mean "more than three times within 24 hours". Also, the definition of an edit war doesn't technically have to involve reverts

9177: 6126:

pure fiction and it is boastful literature which aims to aggrandize Arab Muslim achievement, which may be compared to the Greek accounts of the Greco-Persian wars

5433:

Either they've created that very quickly - at LLM speed - or they'd already spent time off-wiki creating a new article on a subject on which we already have one.

16083: 15558: 11734: 8599: 7488: 7423: 7171: 7165: 5798: 2753: 949: 15775: 15095: 9733:

For a further look, I pulled up recent ANI posts involving Graham87's admin actions. There have been several of varying merit, but the most relevant one was in

2682:

street and when they didn't get a response they went to my sick elderly parent's house and woke them up too. I believe the article's subject is weaponising the

14270: 13875: 12558: 12003: 11944: 10189: 8630: 8502: 7213: 6114:

opinion expressed by the note that they left is being described as "worthless, meaning that an opinion saying the same thing about 'persians' would be equally

5691: 5240: 2512: 2478: 425: 10789:

This response reads like you still intend to push RfCs as a way to force your changes into articles when other editors disagree with you. Also, be careful of

6263:. We're not going to ignore the policies of this website merely because you oppose them, and it certainly doesn't give you the right to constantly attack me. 5130:

Thank you for clarifying. I still stand by my opinion on the insistence of politeness at all times, but at least I understand where you're coming from now. —

2698: 1510: 16201: 16027: 15284: 13946: 12495: 12197: 12169: 11319:

Ok, what I am about to say may seem far-fetched but is genuinely the truth. I have no recollection of consciously editing the size of the Soviet flag in the

10109: 9303: 8480: 7291: 7267: 7025: 5663: 5496: 5396: 5176: 5168: 3864: 3752: 3651: 3562: 3407: 3389: 3321: 3205: 3164: 2598: 2452: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1075: 953: 831: 762: 496: 13856: 11515:. So you can excuse me if I feel at least one of the editors calling me out in this situation is somewhat biased in their application of Knowledge's rules. 9785: 4962: 2553: 13964: 13950: 10230: 9165: 8799: 8488: 8276: 7091: 5828: 4898: 2379: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 15661:

for months, and the continuous cycle of unconstructive edits made without consensus and personal attacks all the time is becoming exhausting for editors.

13193: 12147: 10841:)to be an increasing trend of users jumping straight to RfC immediately on getting any pushback, or as a kind of last roll of the dice when they are in a 9515: 9501: 7237: 4829: 15525: 15040: 14633: 14520: 14375: 13835: 13547: 12823:

as an example). They have been warned several times about this now. Apologies if this is formatted improperly, this is only my second-ever report here.

12131: 11323:

infobox as set forth in your link. One of the reasons I want to point this out is something strange happened like this before around a week ago. Over at

9800: 9597: 8964: 8930:

On the English Knowledge you probably should switch it. .co is the TLD for Colombia - that is why the IPs version of the link has a Spanish-language UI.

8824: 8716: 8570: 8548: 8530: 8216: 7129: 7117: 6825: 3415: 2673: 2165:

The fact you have misinterpreted and misrepresented these sources to portray an approval of a proposal as an actual rename serves as a testament to your

1066: 383: 182: 14576:

I will also keep a lookout for concerning contributions from Hexerade. I have just looked at the revision from Northern Moonlight. Have an amazing day!

14143: 14108:

I support a six-month ban too. I just don't understand why these things that were referenced above had to be said so often, why it had to come to this.

13902:. In view of this, I will outline some of their pending nominations or reviews at GAN, DYK, and FLC. Anybody is welcome to volunteer to take over them. 13645: 11996: 5299: 2518: 1557: 1539: 16131: 15606:

With just over 200 edits, this user seems to be using English Knowledge as a battleground to promote a narrow ethnic POV, specifically centered around

15407: 13620:) suggesting that they chip in here with what they like doing. With any luck, we can find them a backlog that they’ll enjoy, and can benefit the wiki. 13004: 9032: 8331: 8290: 8152: 8120: 8089: 7417: 4800: 4779: 3677: 3502:

I am writing to formally request the restoration of the Request for Comments (RFC) that I initiated regarding a content dispute and user conduct with @

3472: 2530: 2495: 2338: 2324: 1767: 1350: 1193: 1071: 14072:

seems appropriate; they're clearly well-intentioned and willing to work on improvement and I think will become a valuable contributor to the project.

13702: 13631: 13148: 12980: 9910: 9826: 9465: 8619:

has been spamming AI-generated unblock requests 5 times in their talk page, someone please cover the user's mouth up with a duct tape and shut it up.

8229:

is quite revealing; I agree that the excuses by Rainermaria27 sound a lot like Gingeksace. The Lerro AfD on en-WP from 2015 is also very interesting:

3802: 1804: 1789: 15860: 15841: 15827: 15813: 15290: 15062: 14298: 14132: 13938: 13659: 12791: 10784: 9952: 9854: 9840: 9694: 9671: 8244: 8103: 7097: 6680: 6658: 5777: 4947: 3764: 3093: 2306: 2232: 2218: 2198: 2184: 2153: 2137: 2111: 2091: 2076: 1987: 1753: 1525: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 855: 850: 845: 840: 15210: 9764: 9394: 8645: 6809: 6795: 5753: 5599: 5322: 5139: 5125: 5107: 5032: 4469: 4444: 4426: 4407: 4385: 4363: 4339: 4317: 4299: 3016: 2857: 15260: 14597: 14585: 14571: 14556: 14538: 14505: 13942: 13673: 13609: 13394: 12487: 12404: 12292: 12236: 10806: 9324: 9245: 8858: 8431:

I don't think we need to speculate on whether the editors adding this content are fans, subjects, or publicists in order to push back against it. —

8358: 7411: 7399: 7393: 7387: 6737: 6729: 6722: 6672: 6634: 6561: 6553: 6543: 6505: 6478: 6464: 6406: 6365: 6327: 6319: 6300: 6286: 6278: 6272: 6242: 6234: 6227: 6209: 6201: 6175: 6141: 6133: 5975: 5499:

that they've just uploaded claiming they're the copyright holder, that it's their own work and that it was created today. It's also at unsplash.com

5161: 5013: 4851: 3717: 3703: 3659: 3645: 3589: 3570: 3440: 3355: 3316:

Thank you for bringing the oversight in the question to my attention. I should have included a reference to the secondary source in the discussion.

3238: 3213: 3199: 1924: 274: 141: 15413: 14192: 13889: 13779: 12461: 11853: 11828: 11746: 11466: 11437: 11422: 11395: 11381: 11305: 11272: 11239: 9614: 9482: 9010:

I meant to block that IP, while allowing accounts from that IP to edit. Also, 99.175.18.1, is registered to School District 57, Prince George, BC

8002: 3931:

I can at least promise I've gotten enough constructive feedback here that I won't find it necessary to close anything this quickly in the future.

2871: 2843: 2612: 1719:

And also my inputs were civil, reasonable, and much needed for reaching consensus. The discussions available at Afds are self explanatory to this.

1701: 16035: 15920: 15052: 14992: 14959: 12923: 12909: 12859: 12348: 12264: 10987: 10855: 10151:

who, as is widely known, became a US citizen in 2019. But dual citizenship is a thing and many people are citizens of both the US and the UK. At

9407: 9267: 8440: 8174: 8134: 7800: 7736: 7273: 7201: 7183: 7111: 5920: 5877: 5862: 5843: 5724:

How many times have they remade this page, with Copyvios, now? Aren’t we supposed to come down hard on folks who don’t take the hint on copyvios?

5275: 5255: 4998: 3497: 3397: 3382: 3329: 3274: 3070: 1969: 827: 758: 415: 15891: 15877: 15383: 14625: 13717: 13020: 12961: 12947: 12888: 11125:. If you were going to open a discussion on the matter, that's an engagement that requires a certain type of munition: arguments predicated in 10427:

All of these RFCs ended with the status quo except for Woodrow Wilson. The editor has been approached about creating too many RFCs on this topic

10048: 9208: 9198: 6728:

running around talking about how they have positive contributions, how many better contributions, better editors has their existence prevented?

6513: 6494: 6472: 6422: 5614: 3746: 2983: 2955: 2887: 2827: 2669: 15540: 15248: 14256: 14033: 13134: 12082: 12042: 11524: 11451: 11198: 11151: 11066: 10976: 10949: 10931: 10890: 10820: 10758: 10739: 10593: 10570: 10552: 10534: 9259: 8157:

For anyone wishing to avoid reading through the 2015 SPI linked to the 2015 AfD which Allan pointed out above, the brief version is as follows:

7297: 6707: 6642: 6388: 6373: 6343: 5428: 5390: 5366: 4564: 4550: 4509: 4491: 4278:

Sorry, but I don't think that Zemen is a sockpuppet? And I was not threatening them, I was warning them, which I did after they had engaged in

4156: 4141: 4111: 3967: 3052: 2373: 378: 14213: 14173: 13052:

Well, that was predictable. New editors wanting to "revolutionize" Knowledge do not have the patience to wait out a week or month-long block.

11694: 11665: 11623: 11581: 11554: 11109: 11091: 10716: 9890: 9875: 9151: 8682: 6696: 5770: 5470: 4731: 4726: 4719: 4716: 4458: 4251: 4236: 4165:

and it's a typo, I used it on my keyboard before so the system set that. I didn't write this on purpose, it's childish to blame me with that.

3821: 2411:. He made a page move request today by citing that the target name was more popular in Google books ngram, when in reality it's the opposite. 16100: 15575: 14834: 14089: 12868: 12031: 9540: 9157: 9102: 9019: 9005: 8746: 8514: 8419: 8235:. Then the PR campaign moved back to en-WP in 2021. It has been quite a persistent effort, more than just a random "fan" or two of the poet. 7979: 7965: 7947: 7933: 7916: 7897: 7882: 7863: 7848: 7833: 7818: 7786: 7771: 7721: 7706: 7670: 7640: 7625: 7483:. While I am not claiming Menotti Lerro is not notable, his article is supported with a lot of local sourcing, and sources by his professor, 5414: 5065: 3616: 2739: 2719: 2285: 1894:

I have noticed your actions on the NTPC Power Plant pages I created as per WP:NBUILDING rule. This seems to be driven by a sense of vengeance

1603: 14609: 14358: 14336: 14156: 13765: 13748: 13580: 13566: 13063: 13047: 12619: 11724: 11709: 11052: 11030: 11003: 9226: 8976: 7582:

do not be so focused on the "COI problem" and help the page to be developed if earned a place on this 💕. Life is too short to be so strict

6761:. If they have a change of heart, they can request an unblock and contribute to the encyclopedia without casting aspersions at other users. 5894: 5490: 4594: 4273: 4214: 4196: 4049:

nt: my talk page history, which is common mistakes made by new users, is irrelevant. and im right that youre a farsist (maybe اطلاعات) glo.

2810: 1938: 1548:

has resumed editing, without response here or even to the polite message on their usertalk requesting their acknowledgement of this thread.

14242: 14228: 13235: 13219: 12037: 11899: 11331:. Similarly, while I recall making changes to the lede, I have no recollection of undoing said edits. Either I have an undiagnosed case of 10771:

describes the process, including instructions for how and why to create a request for comment (RfC), to participate in one, and to end one.

10512: 10495: 10206: 10056: 9712: 8906: 8734: 5905:

Adding to the ANI report (apologies for the initial brevity) that this user has previously been warned about their page move vandalism by @

5628: 5456: 5442: 5167: 3951: 3926: 3902: 3876: 3307: 2992: 2938: 2913: 2271: 15325: 15027: 14986: 13166: 10707:. I will not hold your hand. You are on your own and you are completely responsible for your own edits. So, conduct yourself accordingly. 10471: 8661: 8397: 8379: 4205:: He keeps bothering me and keeps replying to only three edits, what do you want me to do? he's annoying, and I text the way he deserves. 15492: 15458: 15444: 15371: 15340: 14319: 14005: 13123:

Do you guys and gals need an SPI chucked together on this? It feels like folks are finding bits and pieces, and a CU could find the lot.

13118: 12634: 12512: 12481: 10668: 10647: 10629: 10612: 10323: 10309: 10176: 9728: 9098: 8925: 8892: 8878: 8740: 8188: 7655: 7611: 7559: 5713: 5563: 5527: 5511: 5352: 5193: 4892: 4707:

Two other users in this thread called Zemen out for their behaviour (one even asking them to strike their attacks and cease them). Admin

3254: 2783: 2765: 1678:

amongst other Afds, driving editors away and stopping it coming to consensus. This is one of three articles with similar names including

1314: 444: 217: 59: 15614:. Every one of their edits (just take a look at their contributions) is controversial or contentious and raises questions as to whether 12601: 11880: 8163:

I created different accounts because edited the page from different places so I did not have with me the password of previous accounts

4695:

What attack? this is the idea of the persian Iranians, which some Kurds also have, sir. and ofc something you don't like isn't reliable.

3850: 3172: 3112: 15915: 15699:"Besides the last time I saw your name is when you were blocked indefinitely on the French Knowledge for "Disruptive Contributions"..." 15266: 14063: 12785: 12744: 11956: 11685:

other editors to pile on me in this thread in what seems as a barely disguised attempt to muzzle any further participation on my part.

10247: 7345: 4976:. That should cover the low-hanging fruit. Another admin may want to review this in more depth and see if anything else is in order. 4524: 4174: 3038: 2042: 1638: 1188: 454: 373: 222: 15004: 14117: 14098:

from article quality assessment as well as related contests. A focus on other endeavors, like expanding stubs, is highly recommended.

13802: 11929: 11914: 11729:

Nobody is turning a blind eye to Remsense's part. Remsense's part has already been addressed and solved. They have said things like

10580:. To restrict myself otherwise feels like censorship designed to discourage changes to the status quo which I feel certain users like 10134: 8939: 2057: 796: 15747: 15726: 15689: 14660: 14392: 13368:

Please gain some more experience with Knowledge and improve your writing skills before you review or nominate articles at FAC/FLC/GAN

13279: 12583: 8728: 8636:

I am the blocking administrator. Cryptic revoked talk page access while I was visiting with my granddaughter and picking up a pizza.

7357: 6713:

by asilvering. To no surprise, they are also attacking me (and Wikaviani) in the thread, even commenting in OUR summary of disputes.

5542: 3261:

And I closed it again. The consensus here seems to be that it was a good close, and it certainly is not appropriate to reopen it and

2968: 1858: 419: 15389: 13737:? Peer reviews are not quite assessment and offer an opportunity to develop the skills needed for the areas that have been an issue 12666: 12651: 11973: 11040: 3826:

In addition to the opinions already expressed, the RFC's question was clearly both out of scope for the article, and a violation of

17: 16148: 15300:

with the summary : "Think twice or thrice before adding/deleting or go only make wiki pages about Pakistan as you’re a gay Paki." (

14892: 14481: 14103: 10486:

is an utterly inappropriate thing to say to a fellow editor? If so, will you commit to never saying anything like that ever again?

9323:

There ended up being a total of 4 user blocks that I ended up lifting. Two were probably okay but not needed anymore; the block of

9090: 9049: 7494:

The promo has been occurring at a highly accelerated rate this past month. Administrator attention to this situation is requested.

6023:

Looks like its national insult me and Persians day today. Such behaviour has no place on this site (or elsewhere for that matter).

2655: 1849: 202: 15957:. Also, the only edits of this account was those reversions, so despite having only two warnings I think this is sufficent to say 6082:

You are hampering the spread of knowledge using the clunky wikipedia interface as your weapon. Your account needs to be suspended.

2623:

OP should forward whatever evidence they have that this happened in the tiny everyone-knows-everyone else United Kingdom, to both

2521:, making the above thread nonsensical in spots. I cannot undo the edit and do not currently have time to manually restore them. — 14526: 13842: 13472:

that you immediately disengage from content quality–related processes on Knowledge and focus your efforts elsewhere for some time

11503:

has received no reprimand whatsoever for his conduct on the page while I have a big, ugly edit-war tag on my talk page posted by

10292: 6851: 545: 315: 14932: 13558: 13453: 11189:

is based on fairly flimsy evidence and does not involve any abuse of the Rfc process which is the primary focus of this thread.

7697:

Just state your wrongdoing clearly. You might as well because this is the least convincing attempt at deception that I've seen.

2536: 2028: 1758:

Also I can't help it if there are no the merge proposal lead nowhere due to lack of participation. I can't be blamed for that.

16094: 15569: 14828: 13693:

six month topic ban on article quality assessment, broadly construed. Use that time to substantively improve articles instead.

10691:, I am under no obligation to instruct you on the precise circumstances when you can or cannot open an RFC. It is incumbent on 10543:) feel I have been abusing the Rfc process and when you believe it is (or is not) appropriate to open one in the first place. 10353: 10120: 9080: 8986:, Knowledge doesn't require accounts. The IP has been given a final warning; if disruptive edits continue, just report them to 8580: 6382:" What are you talking about ? Any of your comments contains attacks towards other editors, which only proves my above comment. 5992: 5776: 2059: 1716:

Most importantly, my inputs may have also made it clear to users unfamiliar with the subject that they are different companies.

1372: 822: 538: 310: 232: 104: 11296:

very unlikely to get stopped by the police for it? This is similar, in some respects – but there is no "right to re-revert".

4718:

with no diffs to back it up. And before that, they asked ME to not "further provoke" an editor who is already clearly "upset"

1403:

This editor has brought MoS problems to an awful lot of film/television-related articles and never explained their edits (see

16052: 15653:

The user frequently employs personal attacks and casts aspersions against other editors whenever their edits are reverted or

14461: 14010:

as an aside, i don't feel comfortable weighing in on a restriction on contest participation as a current coordinator of one (

13854: 13629: 13462:

You've had some experienced editors telling you you need to slow down, but you seem to be ignoring them. Can you tell me why?

13404: 13132: 12129: 12013: 11036: 10782: 10200: 9435:

Flight709 as "completely untrustworthy and are not welcome here". How is this not plain and simple abuse of admin power? The

5751: 5597: 5297: 2665: 471: 212: 151: 10994:

in particular for where they acknowledge that this rationale is their personal views, not what reliable sources might say).

5475:

I don't like editing other editors' user pages, but it seems worth a shot in this instance. I've left them a message there.

5071:

I remain convinced that it's always best to be collegial to editors you're in a content dispute with, even if they're dicks.

15678:"You have no concern for the Tamazight language, your convolutions just serve to hide it from the article and the infobox." 14718: 14085: 12589: 12506: 12489: 12209: 12181: 9432: 9340:

acknowledges some of them were excessive, but comes across as deeply suspicious of new/anonymous editors with an immediate

9313: 8230: 8109: 5673: 5187: 5090:

We are all volunteers here, not professionals or robots. The insistence on politeness over everything else just encourages

4757: 2055: 550: 290: 207: 15128:

Upon closer inspection, his source was authored by "Ritesh Sahu" and had been shoehorned onto the page three other times.

12914:

I have blocked CrazyLoverFutbolLoko for one week for disruptive editing including factionalism and battleground behavior.

8317:

I think it's the fan excitement flavor of COI. I doubt they're literally paid to do this, but I think either tag is fine @

6630: 5340: 5336: 14776: 14410: 14081: 13107:

who had a very different writing style but was making a similar argument about a FIFA World Cup and was blocked in July.

12738: 12078: 11979: 10241: 6899: 6088: 6081: 6048: 6027: 3008: 1632: 1586: 1319: 410: 335: 190: 121: 15144: 15140:

On 28 September, Ritesh8040 returns not just to citing his website, but citing his exact same article for Maggie Smith

13467: 12444: 12416: 12388: 12304: 12248: 11511:

opinion on how the page should look just so happens to coincide with the views strongly articulated on the talk page by

10434: 10161:

has stated on multiple occasions how ashamed he is of being born in the United Kingdom and his dislike of British people

5395:

This isn't looking promising. After their draft article on their user page was deleted, they've just started a new one (

5305: 15754: 15509: 14654: 14386: 14367: 13273: 13043: 12809: 12718:

So I am impartial to this entire thing, but I'll take it here since I stumbled across it and it isn't looking good. On

12360: 12332: 12276: 10905:

you engaged once they started, and admins and the community won't care to make that effort in general if you give them

9250:

Each sentence containing the word "rape" or "murder" has a cite after it; one is even as part of a cited direct quote.

8199:

In the meantime, I would suggest mass draftification of all articles created by these editors (that are not undergoing

7683:. Also, why would you need to use a different account when in a different house anyway? And how could you consistently 7453: 7369: 7068: 7059: 7050: 7041: 7020: 6973: 6940: 4482:. I don't have to lie to you, I've used the 'porsian' phrase before, and the system suggests that I've used it before. 3989: 3156: 523: 518: 503: 340: 330: 295: 166: 13618: 11681:

not only (1) characterizing me as a "problem editor" in the discussion which I started at your recommendation but (2)

11442:

Why are you holding me responsible for the behavior of another editor? You should be taking that up with them, not me.

11277:

WP:EW and WP:BB are in tension. What looks like "bold editing" to one person can look like "edit warring" to another.

10992: 16142: 15504: 14886: 14544: 14250: 11677:

If I just received an edit-war tag on my talk page, I would not feel the need to complain. What I take issue with is

9043: 6530:? I couldnt care less if they were Arab or Kryptonian. You are unable to make a single comment without attacking me. 5304:

There was recently another editor also using the iOS app who didn't discover their talk page until they were blocked,

3907:

I started writing a discussion point asking whether the frequency with which this issue arises (and is shot down) on

3791: 1896:". Since this report was filed, they have been mass welcoming new users despite some of those users having zero edits 528: 461: 357: 350: 300: 13884:, this is a reasonable idea, and I see Rollinginhisgrave has taken the initiative to take over some of the reviews. 12815: 8753: 3005: 2437:

per nomination, clearly a net negative in this topic area. They are only creating more work for others to clean up.

2409: 2407: 2160:

The decision was taken at a state cabinet meeting, an official said, adding the proposal will be sent to the Centre.

1906: 16196: 16022: 15985: 15966: 15420: 15301: 13918: 13861:

I do see that most people are in agreement about a topic ban but I would also like to suggest that upon returning @

13597: 12797: 12063: 12059: 11984: 10212: 7440:

Regarding User:Gingeksace - of the 68 articles they created, all except 5 are about the Italian poet/entrepreneur

6845: 6428: 5883: 5572: 5569: 4116:

Not only what you said makes no sense, has zero diffs, and barely addresses my report. Now you're doubling down at

2923: 2223:

I thought MOS for Civil Aviation is the approving authority so my bad. The approving authority is central cabinet.

1879: 1877: 788: 675: 161: 126: 15780:

Steven:1991 continues to use misleading edit summaries, referencing substantive edits as "fixed grammar," as seen

14440:? They've been vandalizing various pages for the past 4 hours but for some reason no one has checked AIV. Thanks. 12803: 10448: 10442: 6432: 3160: 2061:. I don't think that short window of time is enough for you to decide whether an article should be merged or not. 16216: 15785: 15272: 15125:

when I reverted his edit because it introduced redundant information and his source said it was "powered by AI".

13139:

I'm about 95% confident that SinisterUnion and CrazyLoverFutbolLoko will come up as a match. Okay, maybe 98%. --

10347: 10159:. When asked to provide a reliable source for that claim, he did not do so. In the article, he wrote that Oliver 9978: 9655:(bolding mine). Honestly, that is mind-boggling how someone would come to that conclusion. Support another admin 9334: 9194: 8795: 8765: 8759: 7566: 5986: 4888: 4020:

This is just their attacks, I could cite their disruptive edits too. Their talk page history is full of warnings

3420:

As is clearly stated at the top of the page, the filer should expect scrutiny applied to their behavior as well.

3003: 2424: 1860: 1366: 1324: 562: 513: 466: 325: 247: 136: 52: 16124: 15781: 15743:"I also suggest not getting lost in the delaying method on the part of the pov-pushers who oppose this writing." 15599: 14864: 13664:

Go ahead. No one's obligating you to keep any templates on your user page that you don't want to keep there. --

12821: 10440: 10438: 10431: 10428: 5246:

Do you know if they can read page histories? I could make a dummy edit with a link to their UTP in the summary.

4630:

I'm sure u, like all other porsians, will resort to the saying that the word 'Kurd' is a word used for shepherd.

4028:

I'm sure u, like all other porsians, will resort to the saying that the word 'Kurd' is a word used for shepherd.

3665: 16118: 16046: 15930: 15593: 14858: 14487: 13905: 12779: 12153: 10766: 10253: 10224: 10077:

article, they implied the Irish version was Anglophobic without a reference, further implying the same for the

9419: 9338: 9291: 9142:

Turns out- the vast majority of that content was copyvio. I've removed it and marked it for revdel. Sincerely,

8805: 8771: 7760: 6616: 6457: 6439: 6357: 5849: 4847: 633: 449: 393: 345: 264: 227: 16112: 15961:. I would also suggest protecting the former page because it is going through an edit war from other editors. 15627: 15587: 15449:

Not much else you can do. I've blocked that range too, but only for a week. They might keep hopping, though.--

15395: 14852: 12536: 12090: 12086: 11164: 10482:, I have a question for you and would appreciate a direct and concise answer: Do you understand that writing 10445: 10093: 10089: 10085: 9812:

a large proportion of bad faith editors who are freuently abusive and/or lie. It's much easier for someone to

5217: 15629: 15488: 15440: 15321: 14840: 14712: 14266: 14198: 14058: 13982:

of course i am not happy to see it come to this board, but i have to corroborate the issues raised here. i'd

13592:

suggested copyediting, or maybe you could "adopt" some other backlog. How about de-stubbing? I see you're in

13183: 13162:

I was the admin who blocked Fa30sp and I would lay a small bet that both the editors named above are linked.

12768: 12158:

There is probably one and the same person who under various IP accounts pushing various subcategories of the

11211:

occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions."

10265: 10218: 9990: 9708: 9110: 8262: 7506: 6094:

Account created on February 2021, 133 edits, majority of which have been reverted. Fail to see how they're a

5343:. I left them a message about copying another bit from within Knowledge but those two had some other origin. 2369: 1713:

I never said a single point again and again. My discussion lead to clearing misunderstanding that took place.

1662: 664: 269: 257: 252: 23: 14690: 14434: 13309: 12524: 10331: 9715:) and agreed not to repeat it (sadly, no one looked at that unblock request within a reasonable timeframe). 8554:

Most of this material is sourced to Lerro himself or to his "members/adherents" - to it's all COI sourcing:

5205: 4768: 4681: 4674: 4667: 4650: 4647: 4079: 4072: 4065: 4048: 4045: 1874:

Owned by NTPC and there is little to no reason to have separate article, All plants are owned by one company

16172: 16106: 15581: 15191: 15153:

Since returning to Knowledge in February 2024, Ritesh8040's only actions have been to cite his own website

14922: 14846: 14770: 14188: 14128: 13871: 13026: 12756: 12530: 10008: 9996: 9094: 9073: 8544: 8461: 7692:

We all know that behind almost every page of living authors there is often someone close to the same author

7570:

We all know that behind almost every page of living authors there is often someone close to the same author

7462:

and there were a few sockpuppet investigations on it-wp. Gingeksace has removed COI templates in the past.

7339: 6970:(which was redirected to Menotto Lerro’s article) (Note: this has now been blank-and-redirected to Empathy) 6893: 5211: 3089: 2761: 2635: 1897: 1650: 1567: 1535: 1506: 645: 533: 403: 195: 15154: 15149: 15116: 14678: 14398: 13297: 11324: 9358:

I'm not offering to do it, but what exactly is it that you are asking the community to do? Talk to him? –

7491:, who is a member of Lerro’s Empathism, other members/adherents of Empathism or other affiliated sources. 6875: 6121:

This is what was said, the note they left in place of primary sources that actually had numerical figures:

5737:

NebY has pretty much said all else that there is to say. Blocks are meant to prevent, and a site one will

5581: 5578: 5575: 5533:'s message about an hour ago but carried on editing their user page. They haven't edited their talk page. 4701: 4694: 4629: 4126: 4124: 4121: 4027: 3477:

It would be a practice point for me to remember to state explicitly that the RfC was malformed next time.

16160: 15981: 15962: 15740: 15733: 15696: 15682: 15675: 15654: 15651: 15648: 15141: 15133: 15131: 15129: 15126: 14910: 12762: 12070: 11122: 10377: 10259: 9984: 9131: 9061: 8539:

ping me with particular tasks. I can make a source assessment table or remove cruft from artist pages. --

7459:

Interestingly, Lerro’s article on Italian Knowledge was deleted for lack of encyclopedic value/notability

6549: 6361: 6016: 4984:

Let me know if the attacks on your ethnicity or motivations continue, and I'll block indef. I know that

4958: 4843: 4785: 3983: 2052: 1901: 1868: 1656: 1396: 746: 398: 78: 16076: 9963: 8513:, there is not a defined action plan to my knowledge. Some of the editors have opened AfDs (for example 6863: 5834:

I've reversed it, but you should probably try to explain to them why their article is being deleted. --

3755:, but that looks like a good close. You'll have to accept that you're outside consensus on this one. -- 1421:). They continued disrupting Knowledge even though they had been warned about these multiple times (see 16088: 15563: 15157: 15086: 14822: 14748: 14684: 14428: 14275:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#Seeking en masse rollback of disruptive edits

13922: 13523: 13303: 12975: 12726:, there appears to be a group of editors trying to band together under some "faction" (these users are 12518: 12142: 11126: 10451: 10365: 10002: 9777: 9724: 9663: 9496: 9106: 8819: 8791: 8594: 8497: 8456:

on the promotional items listed or do they need to be nominated one-by-one? Thanks for any guidance. --

8326: 8271: 7970:

Okay, maybe we'll get a straighter answer if you log out and then log back in with the Nihaon account?

6004: 5793: 5199: 4874: 4816: 3855:

I was watching this as it happened, and it's my understanding the RFC was closed within two hours. In @

3243:

I'd say someone's irony detector needs to be taken in for recalibration, but ChatGPT doesn't do irony.

2960:

Yes. Whether or not off-wiki events have occurred as described, GDX420's description of their stance –

1934: 1384: 742: 320: 146: 131: 116: 86: 45: 16064: 14806: 12662: 12630: 12579: 12554: 11760:

continue down that path you may be blocked. Notably, although Nick-D may be an admin, since they were

6923: 6461: 6451: 6445: 6185: 2823:

and needs to get trimmed significantly. It probably doesn't need to be mentioned in the lead either.

1899: 16166: 15163:

who created four articles for "Ritesh Sahu" is his favourite author Ritesh Sahu from the website Live

14916: 14736: 14666: 14273:" I've reverted all of their relevent edits. We spent a lot of time last December dealing with this ( 13849: 13624: 13285: 13127: 13085: 12774: 12750: 12124: 12007: 11840:

Emiya1980, I don't think that anyone is expecting to issue sanctions specifically for the WWII edits.

10777: 10576:

not been reached in favor of either position, I do not see the problem in opening an Rfc as I did on

10194: 9758: 9591: 9159: 9067: 8959: 7998: 7318:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement who also participated in a presentation about Lerro’s manifesto 6805: 6766: 6653: 5954: 5746: 5722: 5592: 5332: 5292: 5281: 4943: 4640: 4326:

and namecalling due to ones alleged ethnicity (my ethnicity is not disclosed on my userpage, in fact

4038: 4013: 2950: 2677: 2503:

Editor clearly does not want to listen & just wants to get their way, regardless of the facts. —

2096:

That is pure disinformation. No name change has occurred so far. Which source are you talking about?

1726:

may note "Sometimes, a long comment or replying multiple times is perfectly acceptable or needed for

1644: 1490: 1468: 305: 156: 15719: 15712: 15705: 15636: 14794: 13636:

I love reviewing AFC articles, and I also like destubbing articles, though I didn't do much lately.

11568:, not you. With that being said, I'm not going to be only one taking the fall for an edit war which 7938:

Okay, so evidently there is no plausible good faith explanation for your activity. Good day to you.

6911: 1862: 1838:

of personally attacking them when there was nothing in their reply that could be considered as such

15823: 15793: 15224: 15148:

I give a second warning later on 28 September, and Ritesh8040 cites himself again on 29 September.

15146: 14898: 14672: 14169: 13291: 13179: 12719: 12500: 12203: 12175: 11939: 11327:, another editor confronted me over my reversion to his edits in the "Locarno Treaties" section of 11057:

I did only two reverts. That's pretty common in terms of what I've seen of other editors' conduct.

10288:(see filter log). Any admin willing to take action on these accounts would be greatly appreciated. 9769:

The only possible "action" here is to take this to ArbCom, no? Seems they'd be likely to accept an

9307: 8625: 8476: 8436: 8212: 8116: 8070: 7360:– an autobiographical novel by Lerro with the “critical reception” section of the article cited to 6869: 6163:. Yet I am clearly the "hyper emotional" one here, everyone can see your treatment towards me here 5910: 5667: 5225:

Could an admin apply a gentle mainspace block to get their attention so they read their talk page?

5181: 5039:

what I see here is an experienced user deciding to bully a less-experienced user with an ANI report

4282:

and namecalling several times. As you can see, they're still doubling down, showing signs of being

4001: 3912:

Then the discussion got closed, and things turned into a revert war over the close.To your point, @

3655: 3566: 3411: 3393: 3325: 3209: 3168: 1459: 1417: 1411: 1405: 639: 491: 15626:. This pattern of contentious disruptive editing of theirs goes all the way back to 2017 and 2020. 9428: 16154: 15999: 15995: 15977: 15950: 15946: 15942: 15938: 15521: 15118:

That should be water under the bridge now, but the user's editing is still about self-promotion.

14904: 14515: 14184: 14124: 14077: 13899: 13881: 13867: 13478: 12732: 12723: 12103: 11814: 10371: 10273: 10235: 10025:

OK, all good alternatives to blocking. Short-term semi-protection has seemed to work so far at a

9682: 9678: 9647:

really ought to have known better than to interpret them tagging him in their unblock request as

9400: 9085: 9055: 8678: 8540: 8510: 8457: 8161:

trivial, what is the problem, why are you concentrating on this irrelevant stuff. Also, notably,

7690:

Presenting your abuses as hypotheticals, such as your sockpuppetry and the comment earlier about

7303: 7192:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement, writer of the “official anthem” of the Empathic Movement 6718: 6539: 6296: 6268: 6223: 6171: 6103: 6010: 5816: 5520: 5157: 4796: 4775: 4746: 4546: 4505: 4465: 4440: 4403: 4381: 4335: 4295: 4137: 4085: 3085: 3012: 2632: 2570: 2548: 2474: 2334: 2302: 2281: 2228: 2194: 2149: 2133: 2087: 1983: 1903: 1865: 1856: 1854: 1852: 1800: 1763: 1749: 1626: 1580: 1531: 1502: 1478: 1390: 12928:

Not mentioned here, after the above edit, block extended to 1 month, and TPA revoked by Cullen.

12215: 12187: 12067: 11603:

on talk first, and then only placing a banner if no consensus or improvements result from that.

10455: 4850:. He has no problem using offensive language when it is directed at groups other than his own. 2584:

it clearly would have show not to go ahead, but it could also have inexperience but it could be

2026: 16070: 15934: 15548: 15513: 15179: 15115:

had an article about himself ("Ritesh Sahu") speedily deleted three times in one week in 2011.

14648: 14581: 14552: 14534: 14380: 14152: 13911: 13831: 13775: 13655: 13641: 13576: 13543: 13506: 13363: 13267: 13039: 12847: 12050: 11849: 11742: 11462: 11433: 11391: 11301: 11235: 11204: 10936:

SnowRise while they could have been clearer, in fact Nemov/the OP did say in their first post "

9886: 9850: 9836: 9822: 9796: 9461: 9241: 9147: 8148: 8099: 8085: 6983: 6857: 6349: 5251: 4954: 4809: 4530: 4232: 3673: 3468: 3370: 3066: 3048: 3027:

Positive content written in an unencyclopaedic tone and sourced to the organisation's website?

2853: 2683: 2566: 2466: 2045: 1785: 1337: 705: 508: 68: 14616:

I have blocked Hexerade for a week and we can see how the sockpuppet investigation plays out.

14404: 13344:

I believe you need to learn more about the GAN/article-writing process first before taking on

11781:

block is something many editors will also have at the back of their mind. I don't hang out at

7595:

The exact degree of association between the editor and Lerro seems unclear, but that they are

7510: 2009:" but this does not address why you welcomed users that have made zero edits to this site. As 16136: 15422:). The attacks seem persistent and I'm not sure how to handle it except reporting it here. — 15331:

The /64 range has an extensive block log. I've blocked them for 6 months (last time was 3).--

14950:

Let me add my two cents; that this influx is a clear attempt to disrupt Knowledge procedure.

14880: 14742: 13734: 13593: 13513: 13212: 12970: 12902: 12829: 12137: 10851: 10359: 10116: 9948: 9491: 9295: 9037: 8846: 8814: 8589: 8492: 8321: 8266: 7252:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement and received Lerro’s Cilento International Poetry Prize 7234:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement and received Lerro’s Cilento International Poetry Prize 7222:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement and received Lerro’s Cilento International Poetry Prize 7011: 6979: 6967: 6758: 6625: 6527: 6500: 6310: 6252: 6160: 5998: 5788: 4994: 4822: 4659:

When I tried to explain to them why it was not nice to resort to namecalling ("farsist") and

4613:

Request for secondary admin opinion; since when is attacking others for their ethnicity okay?

4057:

When I tried to explain to them why it was not nice to resort to namecalling ("farsist") and

3798: 3058: 2839: 2446: 2212: 2178: 2105: 2070: 1918: 1453: 1447: 1441: 1435: 1429: 1423: 1378: 14511: 12658: 12626: 12575: 12550: 11789:

By comparison Remsense is active on warning editors for edit-warring, and reporting them to

7457: 5886:, I imagine. Anyway, blocked indefinitely for disruptive page moves and personal attacks.-- 4973: 4953:

perceived nationality or ethnicity as an adhominem (which is what they appear to be doing).

4021: 2044:. And even if the name change occurred, it would still be disruptive to move that page, see 16190: 16058: 16016: 15887: 15856: 15837: 15809: 15668: 15182:

with ignoring two warnings about the consequences of doing this, and we have a user who is

15048: 15023: 14955: 14940: 14800: 14724: 14567: 14501: 14278: 13846: 13713: 13669: 13621: 13605: 13589: 13377: 13163: 13144: 13124: 12993: 12936: 12877: 12121: 11992: 10906: 10774: 9831:

That's not an excuse nor does it explain the initial block of an editor like StattoSteven.

9743: 9576: 9404: 9374: 9205: 9174: 9119: 8888: 8854: 8566: 8526: 8393: 8307: 8286: 8240: 7994: 7961: 7929: 7893: 7859: 7829: 7796: 7782: 7732: 7717: 7666: 7621: 7499: 7159: 6976:– founded by Lerro to give “prize awards” to adherents/members of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 6917: 6839: 6801: 6762: 6692: 6648: 6490: 6418: 6215: 6070: 5950: 5939: 5916: 5873: 5858: 5839: 5824: 5743: 5624: 5589: 5452: 5424: 5362: 5289: 5121: 5028: 4939: 4712: 4660: 4618: 4534: 4432: 4431:

Okay, that's it. I would a more experienced admin to look into this. I won't tolerate more

4422: 4369: 4359: 4323: 4313: 4279: 4269: 4187: 4058: 3827: 3760: 3578: 3460: 3284: 3117: 2989: 2945: 2878: 2824: 2710: 2125: 1486: 1464: 1339: 15650:

but as expected, Monsieur Patillo made yet another off-topic personal attack against them.

10837: 9213:

They're welcome to withdraw the threat at any time and perhaps have the block lifted, but

8883:

OK, no problem then. I was suspicious of .co domains, since those have been used to spam.

2777:. I deliberately performed a clean start for this reason, 'ca' is basically unsearchable. 1741:

which doesn't appear to be a comment to be made on a collaborative project like Knowledge.

1676:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

8: 15906: 15873: 15819: 15789: 15297: 14782: 14730: 14621: 14354: 14294: 14165: 14027: 13999: 13761: 13698: 13093: 12957: 12919: 12855: 12571: 12566: 12457: 11824: 11720: 11690: 11577: 11520: 11499:; which you yourself admit I bore a smaller part of the blame for. From what I can tell, 11447: 11418: 11377: 11335:

or somebody is piggy-backing on my account to make additional edits without my knowledge.

11328: 11268: 11194: 11148: 11105: 11062: 11026: 10973: 10945: 10928: 10887: 10832: 10754: 10735: 10712: 10664: 10643: 10625: 10589: 10566: 10548: 10530: 10508: 10491: 10421: 10341: 10319: 10172: 9972: 9770: 9431:. They blocked Flight709 for editing "far too quickly, recklessly, and suspiciously" and 9382:

I was hoping that there would be some introspection so it wouldn't be necessary to go to

9328: 8780: 8641: 8620: 8472: 8432: 8208: 8112: 8066: 7602:

It seems to me that this is a straightforward promo only account (and ditto for Nihaon).

7177: 7003: 6733: 6676: 6638: 6611: 6557: 6509: 6468: 6369: 6323: 6282: 6238: 6205: 6137: 5980: 5766: 4855: 4098: 4007: 3733: 3366: 2867: 2806: 2054:, especially when you have proposed multiple of them to be merged within a single minute 2010: 1960: 1727: 1553: 1521: 1360: 709: 481: 388: 82: 15639: 14933:

There's five brand new accounts swarming the discussion in a span of less than two hours

8558:

So if you see any sources written by any of the names listed at the bottom of this page:

7990: 601: 16040: 15924: 15644: 15632: 15517: 15175: 15067: 14788: 14224: 14073: 13457: 12843: 12727: 12615: 12018: 11761: 11657: 11615: 11546: 11083: 11043:

to the talk page were to advertise some of the RfCs noted at the start of this thread.

10799: 10044: 9919: 9904: 9690: 9610: 9509: 9478: 9388: 9346: 9285: 9015: 8998: 8972: 8674: 7309: 7279: 7261: 7246:– adherent of Empathic Movement and received Lerro’s Cilento International Poetry Prize 7189: 7135: 7079: 6905: 6788: 6714: 6699: 6591: 6535: 6334: 6292: 6264: 6219: 6167: 6099: 5684: 5556: 5483: 5407: 5383: 5315: 5268: 5233: 5153: 5132: 5113: 5100: 5079:

is a cornerstone of the wiki, demanding editors remain perfectly calm and professional

5006: 4979: 4839: 4792: 4771: 4742: 4702:

haven't said anything about you, you confirmed this theory yourself with your comments.

4542: 4501: 4475: 4461: 4436: 4399: 4377: 4376:, which you and I both know is not okay. Especially not due to ones alleged ethnicity. 4331: 4291: 4261: 4133: 4081: 3943: 3894: 3842: 3713: 3695: 3637: 3608: 3586: 3489: 3432: 3347: 3299: 3230: 3191: 2523: 2505: 2470: 2381: 2355: 2330: 2317: 2298: 2277: 2257: 2224: 2190: 2145: 2129: 2083: 1994: 1979: 1796: 1773: 1759: 1745: 1671: 1621: 1576: 594: 586: 486: 242: 15832:

I understand that you don’t see it that way, but I would pay attention in the future.

14416: 13538:

Sure, I can accept a topic ban, this is scary on my part, but I probably deserved it.

11012:

That is a complete misrepresentation of my conduct on the page. I did not go over the

10391: 10382:

has created 8 RFCs since May 27th. All of these RFCs have been on stable biographies.

7752:

and the question can be resolved one way or the other. I'd do it myself if I knew how.

7519: 5285: 15958: 15766: 15641: 15615: 15484: 15470:

Thank you anyway. I'll let you know if there's more of these. Appreciate the help. —

15436: 15317: 15183: 14706: 14577: 14548: 14530: 14260: 14149: 14054: 13926: 13862: 13828: 13772: 13652: 13638: 13573: 13553: 13540: 13030: 12682: 12597: 12159: 12074: 11845: 11810: 11738: 11735:"As someone whose biggest point of self-critique is easily that they revert too much" 11569: 11458: 11429: 11387: 11314: 11297: 11246: 11231: 11021:

complaint is completely unrelated to Rfcs which is the primary focus of this thread.

10525:

are more appropriate? Do you understand the concerns that other editors have raised?

10454:, and it’s another completely pointless RFC that wasn’t necessary after the original 9882: 9861: 9846: 9832: 9818: 9792: 9707:

as the reasoning for the block wasn't particularly strong to begin with and the user

9457: 9237: 9143: 9127: 8935: 8144: 8095: 8081: 7016: 6750: 6595: 6531: 6095: 5466: 5247: 4910:

While I quibble over a couple of HoI's points, I think there's enough for at least a

4788: 4761: 4738: 4283: 4228: 4183: 4129: 4097:

and arbitrarily tag just because three of my edits don't 'look neutral', which is an

3995: 3787: 3669: 3464: 3062: 3044: 2849: 2365: 1884: 1781: 10406: 10096:

edits show they not only know how to use citations but also know the correct format.

7432: 5087:

by bringing those attacks to ANI is what I found to be dismissive of their concerns.

4732:....Plus I didn't call you childish, but your thoughts and accusations are childish. 2394:

and reviewing Thewikizoomer's behaviour in this thread, especially comments such as

15619: 15611: 15000: 14764: 14332: 14238: 14209: 14113: 13744: 13207: 12897: 12824: 12697: 12640:

can be challenging with IP editors due to few of them participating on talk pages.

12027: 11705: 11372:

If anybody else viewing this thread has any ideas what's going on, please chip in.

11048: 10999: 10864: 10847: 10416: 10401: 10152: 10105: 9944: 9622: 9255: 9222: 9187:. I'm concerned that no warning was given prior to filing this ANI action, though. 8415: 8354: 8184: 8170: 8130: 8054: 7975: 7943: 7912: 7878: 7844: 7814: 7767: 7702: 7651: 7636: 7607: 7555: 7525: 7365: 7327: 7285: 7195: 7123: 7104: 7064: 6887: 6703: 6462:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247695404

6452:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247670270

6446:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1241923794

6256: 6186:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247670270

5061: 4990: 4656:"Farsist" means "Persianist", whatever that is supposed to mean. More namecalling. 4054:"Farsist" means "Persianist", whatever that is supposed to mean. More namecalling. 3922: 3872: 3860: 3794: 3378: 3280: 3270: 3033: 2970:

don't indicate someone who can edit the article collaboratively and in accord with

2835: 2734: 2693: 2628: 2624: 2591: 2540: 2439: 2205: 2171: 2098: 2063: 1911: 1824: 1723: 1694: 1599: 1590: 11285: 11283: 11281: 10081:

yet using a joke interview from the aforementioned article subject as a reference.

6966:– a so-called “cultural movement” founded by Lerro who also wrote its “manifesto” 4756:

As this report is ongoing, Zemen is still causing disruption. They just replaced "

4128:. Would appreciate if an admin would look at this, fail to see how this user is a 3043:

How is this content that was removed unencyclopaedic and inappropriately sourced?

1867:. Their mass merging proposals of NTPC building articles are problematic as well. 16177: 16003: 15883: 15865: 15852: 15833: 15805: 15536: 15454: 15336: 15206: 15112: 15063: 15044: 15034: 15019: 14951: 14936: 14605: 14563: 14497: 14366: 13709: 13665: 13601: 13571:

Okay, I will not edit for a few days, but I will still watch from the sidelines.

13429: 13171: 13140: 12987: 12930: 12871: 12542: 11988: 11925: 11895: 11790: 11782: 11413:

reversion here by myself; classifying this as edit-warring is frankly overkill.

11185:

However, the fact remains that Nick-D's claim that I started an edit war over at

10816: 10467: 10314:

I semi-protected the article for two weeks to deter additional socking attempts.

9448: 9440: 8884: 8850: 8656: 8562: 8536: 8522: 8389: 8318: 8303: 8282: 8236: 8140: 7957: 7925: 7889: 7855: 7825: 7792: 7778: 7728: 7713: 7662: 7617: 7495: 7374: 7333: 7255: 7243: 7219: 7073: 6834: 6519: 6486: 6414: 6260: 5912: 5869: 5854: 5835: 5820: 5620: 5448: 5420: 5372: 5358: 5117: 5076: 5024: 4765: 4708: 4590: 4582: 4560: 4520: 4487: 4418: 4392: 4355: 4309: 4265: 4247: 4210: 4202: 4170: 4152: 4107: 3977: 3867:

that their use of sources violated medical referencing and fringe content rules.

3756: 3742: 3249: 3146: 2998: 2820: 2747: 2706: 2491: 2276:

I made my points. So yes, I'll stop any further comments/edits on the said AFDs.

2025:". Starting welcoming new users right after proposing merger of over 30 articles 1872:

Especially when the rationale for it is seemingly lacking in any actual policy. "

15135:. I warned the user about using sources he wrote himself, late on 27 September. 13650:

I really want to revert the wikibreak template and review and de-stub articles.

11400:

Apparently, I misread the link. That being said, the problem over at Hindenburg

8179:

And the purpose of the multiple accounts was... to cast multiple votes at AfDs.

7536:

Just a brief note to say that I entirely agree with Netherzone's analysis above.

6233:

the logic the user is employing here, in guise of factuality, that is the case.

6198: 6164: 5585: 4866: 4186:. It's neither a blog, nor a Discord chat, nor a jocular texting conversation. 15903: 15869: 15171: 15091: 14965: 14617: 14350: 14324: 14290: 14017: 14011: 13989: 13793: 13757: 13724: 13694: 13559:

You have already implied before that activities like reviews make you exhausted

13408: 13398: 13336: 13089: 12953: 12915: 12893: 12864: 12851: 12607: 12592:

for the third time, after being given a warning for edit warring it yesterday.

12564:

I was told at AIV this is not obvious vandalism. Except how are revisions like

12467: 12454: 11952: 11910: 11866: 11820: 11774: 11754: 11716: 11686: 11573: 11516: 11443: 11414: 11373: 11264: 11260: 11190: 11156: 11131: 11118: 11101: 11058: 11022: 10956: 10941: 10911: 10870: 10750: 10746: 10731: 10722: 10708: 10688: 10660: 10639: 10634: 10621: 10617: 10585: 10562: 10558: 10544: 10526: 10518: 10504: 10500: 10487: 10479: 10396: 10336: 10315: 10289: 10168: 10078: 9967: 9720: 9383: 9341: 9269: 9214: 9188: 8902: 8864:

I am a bit confused. How is this spam? google.com.co is a Google owned domain.

8776: 8668: 8637: 8425: 7680: 7484: 7405: 7361: 7249: 7225: 7153: 7147: 7141: 7085: 6997: 6152: 5762: 5709: 5701: 5610: 5538: 5507: 5438: 5348: 4985: 4345:

much good at communicating with each other while you're both upset, and as the

2979: 2971: 2934: 2863: 2802: 1948: 1889:

who voted oppose on the original Afd, in their reply to Thewikizoomer they said

1731: 1549: 1545: 1517: 1482: 1355: 691: 15715:"diversion and suppression of sources to support a pov pushing of Arabization" 13382:

I don't believe this user is ready to participate in the GAN process quite yet

12136:

Article SEMIed, IP blocked for 31h, named user warned for logged out editing.

10811:

There's nothing here to suggest the editor is going to change their behavior.

9424: 7809:

subject area and who refuses to declare his transparent conflict of interest.

2051:

How do you explain your blanket merge proposals of NTPC power station articles

1335: 16210: 15954: 15623: 14980: 14493: 14456: 14305: 14220: 13600:. You won't run out of those any time soon, and it will be good practice. -- 13324: 13320: 12611: 12085:'s edit were right and started personal attack towards me; here are the IP's 11802: 11798: 11670: 11647: 11605: 11561: 11536: 11508: 11500: 11223: 11160: 11073: 11013: 10988:

Talk:World War II#Who should be listed at the top of the main Allied leaders?

10901: 10842: 10790: 10700: 10411: 10184: 10140: 10074: 10040: 9813: 9686: 9644: 9606: 9526: 9474: 9281: 9184: 9011: 8991: 8987: 8983: 8968: 8453: 8204: 8200: 8139:

I think one could take a loaf of bread down to the nearest pond and get less

8062: 8058: 7756: 7749: 7480:

Since this campaign began, Lerro is now mentioned hundreds of times on en-wp

7470: 7441: 7055: 7007: 6954: 6932: 6781: 6523: 6306: 6248: 6148: 6074: 5935: 5677: 5549: 5530: 5476: 5400: 5376: 5308: 5261: 5226: 4931: 4919: 4687: 4622: 4538: 4373: 4330:

is not even a Persian city..) okay now? I hope you understand my frustation.

4287: 4224: 4117: 3933: 3913: 3884: 3856: 3832: 3807: 3709: 3685: 3627: 3598: 3582: 3503: 3479: 3422: 3337: 3289: 3220: 3181: 3152: 2926: 2797: 2585: 2415: 2166: 1999:

You haven't addressed any of the issues that have been pointed out by me and

1942: 10503:

Yes, I will commit to refraining from making such statements in the future.

9507:

community has agreed there's a problem it can't solve through normal means.

8165:). Basically, it was transparently the same user operating the same racket. 7368:

and “adherent” of the Empathic Movement who was then awarded one of Lerro’s

2910:

I have created and maintained a section the the Charities Commission enquiry

2404: 2402: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2388: 1890: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1829: 1827: 1821: 654: 15762: 15664: 15472: 15424: 15305: 15178:

as he is citing the most profitable source, not the most accurate. Further

15122: 14044: 12593: 12546: 11530: 11496: 11406: 11320: 11186: 11097: 10696: 10577: 10522: 10386: 9939: 9522: 8931: 8919: 8872: 7921:

Be patient, I think I have already answerd at all possibilities and more...

7321: 7315: 7046: 7031: 6947:, 4 articles on Lerro’s works and at least one article on a family member. 6710: 6665:

Changes were made right after posting, they're additions for the most part.

6482: 6410: 6156: 6066: 6041: 5462: 4497: 4479: 2774: 2359: 2034: 1842: 15729:"As long as you cherry-pick and divert sources, you won't find solutions." 15136: 14070:

six-month restriction from content assessment processes, broadly construed

13178:: Well would you look at that. Both blocked as confirmed socks of Fa30sp. 9568:

to determine whether they were appropriate. I also ask that the appeal by

7420:– adherent to Lerro’s Empathic Movement, an “Empathic Master” of Empathism 6991: 6053:... ...Ought I find some note about how worthless persian sources are, or 5500: 2348: 786: 14996: 14328: 14234: 14205: 14109: 13787: 13756:, I definitely believe that peer review is a form of article assessment. 13753: 13738: 13349: 13224:

And thus ends the rise and fall of "Encyclopedic Revolutionary Faction".

13104: 12693: 12023: 11797:

BTW about your two reverts point, note that some editors chose to follow

11701: 11678: 11565: 11512: 11504: 11227: 11044: 11018: 10995: 10148: 10101: 9452: 9251: 9218: 8411: 8350: 8222: 8180: 8166: 8126: 8051: 7985: 7971: 7939: 7908: 7874: 7840: 7810: 7763: 7698: 7647: 7632: 7603: 7551: 7521: 7037: 6882: 6194:

the user here appears to act as if the article is a fact finding mission.

5094:

and punishes good editors who are understandably upset at being targeted

5057: 3918: 3868: 3374: 3313: 3266: 3028: 2757: 2729: 2688: 1978:

To other mentions, I think I've already responded in respective replies.

1595: 12820:), who are personally attacking others and basically vandalising pages ( 11495:

Well, it seems I'm the only one who is being slammed for an edit war on

11039:

edited the World War II article before starting this edit war, and your

8452:

Question- I have lost the action item on this ANI. Will there be a mass

8233: 7460: 7364:

a member of the Empathic Movement and former professor of Lerro, and to

6943:, 55 articles on members and “adherents” to Lerro’s "Empathic Movement" 1864:, in spite of the fact it is not the official name yet, let a common one 85:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see 15532: 15465: 15450: 15347: 15332: 15202: 14601: 14467: 12046: 11921: 11891: 11730: 10812: 10726: 10581: 10540: 10463: 9868: 9344:

reflex, so I think it needs to be brought to the community for review.

9123: 9028:

Obsessively editing same biographical page after a decade of inactivity

8651: 7198:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement, and interviewer of Menotti Lerro 5887: 5091: 4586: 4556: 4516: 4483: 4257: 4243: 4220: 4206: 4166: 4148: 4103: 3972: 3738: 3625:

No one agrees with your premises. This is not a failing of the system.

3244: 2724:

Any number of ways, it's a small country where everyone knows everyone.

2487: 15419:

reverted me again with the summary "Reverting vandalism by gay Paki" (

11564:

If you read my last post closely, my criticism was primarily aimed at

7515:. The "day of pickaxes" is fun tho, anyone with a good translation of 7469:

This seems to be a coordinated PR/PROMO effort by two SPAs to promote

7019:– a member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement, who was also awarded Lerro’s 4120:(in the very section I opened by asking you not continue your attacks 638:

If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on

15080: 14141:

I also have a peer review in the Simple English Wiki, you can see it

11948: 11906: 9716: 9436: 8898: 8256: 7805:

I didn't mock you, the post you are referring to was by another user.

7474: 7445: 7067:- adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerro’s 7049:- adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerro’s 7040:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerro’s 6963: 6958: 6944: 6936: 5705: 5606: 5534: 5503: 5434: 5375:. Hopefully they'll respond on their talk page and it can be lifted. 5344: 3151:

I am writing to formally report the disruptive behavior exhibited by

2975: 2930: 2329:

There is a difference between behavioural issue and content dispute.

81:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the 12606:

The IP's edits are not vandalism. Please do not call them that, see

9631:

on the surface. We have yet another case of blocking someone off of

14969: 14472: 14442: 14310: 14099: 13972: 13885: 13798: 13562: 13482: 13424:

not wanting to listen to the constructive criticism you are getting

13339:, which discussed several problematic GAN reviews and nominations. 13254:

Well-meaning, but chronically disruptive, editing from TheNuggeteer

13226: 13175: 13157: 13109: 13054: 13011: 12642: 12472: 11964: 11871: 10654: 10603: 10300: 10125: 9531: 9299: 8967:

seems to do some vandalism. Maybe require accounts from that IP? --

8385: 8370: 7058:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerro’s 5906: 4457:

And now up above Zemen is calling me childish (yet another attack)

3908: 3812: 3463:) and the outcome of the discussion was obvious to anyone but you. 3265:

the question being asked after editors have already replied to it.

3159:, they continues to undermine the purpose of the RFC by repeatedly 2262: 15039:

In theory yes, but since those accounts are singularly-focused on

11259:

and therefore edit-warring, then what is the point of Knowledge's

8701:

Persistent unsourced date changes by 2601:14B:4101:400D:0:0:0:0/64

6438:

There's a mistake in editing, I linked to the article after their

5288:, so, depending on how ‘up to date’ that is, it’s anyone’s guess. 2912:

is not the whole story; GDX420 also deleted much positive content.

15658: 15607: 15552: 11203:

There may be some definitional issues here. From the top of the

8913: 8866: 8650:

I'm unclear what we're supposed to do with all that information.

2778: 2486:

Clearly not listening since they're bludgeoning this discussion.

14562:

now but will continue to observe their account's contributions.

13487:

You should hopefully know this by now, but you have to slow down

13434:

I think you should step away from Good Articles entirely for now

9964:

handy-dandy list of admins by number of blocks in the last month

9637:"because attitude is incompatible with writing an encyclopedia" 4641:

your opinions on my edits don't 'look natural' u are too farsist

4529:

It's absolutely mindboggling that you can get away with so much

4039:

your opinions on my edits don't 'look natural' u are too farsist

3650:

Its not about system; its about you. You are abusing the system

2565:. Not a good look that they display no self awareness in citing 2414:

This blatant misrepresentation has shown us that he has serious

14816: 11163:

in the infobox in a way that suggests he was the leader of the

10272:

Happymappy12342 has engaged in repeated unsourced additions to

6199:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah#Estimates

4723:

In fact, this only encouraged Zemen to continue their attacks:

4306:

These don't look like "common mistakes made by new users" to me

4304:

My apologies for the assumption; I misunderstood your comment,

4184:

Your talk page exists for other editors to communicate with you

3793:

to questions about other accounts does not inspire confidence.

2457:

Discussion about the recent move discussion is still ongoing -

2406:

This was after he received warnings for undiscussed page moves

1340: 37: 15174:

linking his own website into Knowledge articles, in breach of

14327:, I blocked that one as obvious, and CU-confirmed two others. 13496:

indefinite topic ban from good article nominations and reviews

12081:(possibly a sock of the same user) in their talkpage claiming 10725:

No, that is not good enough. When I have a biased editor like

10584:

are trying to impose on me. That is my opinion on the matter.

7448:

and its adherants/members of Lerro’s Empathism manifesto, his

6380:

this as another user who simply hates Arabs, and Arab sources.

6315: 5495:

They've continued working on their user page, adding an image

4806:...E and O are not even close to each other on the keyboard... 3859:'s defense it followed closely on an earlier discussion with @ 3459:

Looks like a good RFC close to me. The RFC was malformed (see

1937:

and thanking them for their non-existent contributions...then

1341: 14931:

Can an admin please consider applying blocks and protection?

10765:

I think I can help on the signposting. The central RFC page,

6931:

Gingeksace has created over 60 articles on the Italian poet,

6622:

says the very same thing about Greek sources being worthless.

4625:

by Zemen (imagine if I included their disruptive edits too).

4327: 2919:(above, albeit slightly qualified) and an edit summary about 2399:

Comment: Any issues other than WP:BLUD, use appropriate forum

13561:, and now seems like as good a time as any to take a break. 13203:

I think I had a nightmare that the ArbCom case was accepted!

12588:

This IP has just restored their preferred infobox poster at

10954:

I stand corrected: thanks for pointing that out, Nil Einne.

8227:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Leicesterdedlock/Archive

7687:

between forgetting the passwords for two different accounts?

5335:

but I'd like to ask them if they used an LLM to create e.g.

5152:

Thanks to everyone participating, I highly appreciate it. --

4867:#WP:NPA/WP:ASPERSIONS with a dose of xenophobia by M7md AAAA 1780:

and quit trying to be the grand inquisitor of this article.

14642: 13261: 10539:

Before I answer that question, please tell me how you (not

9926:

I think we can avoid bothering ArbCom. My recommendations:

9529:. You might consider moving this case to that noticeboard. 8588:

TPA yanked, Cullen admonished for not sharing his pizza :D

8519:

WP:Articles for deletion/Cilento International Poetry Prize

8253:

I was going to INDEF for DE, which this absolutely is, but

6753:

due to their doubling down on the use of personal attacks (

3002:

editing in the past, resulting in two previous ANI threads

2917:

the scandal outweighs anything they've done before or since

1851:, as well as renaming mentions of it on different articles 1485:, could you please take a look at this? Thanks in advance! 14874: 9570: 9490:

it needs ArbComm anyway so this step appears unnecessary.

7748:

Hopefully someone will open a sockpuppet investigation at

7435: 7342:– an associate of Lerro who wrote about Lerro and Empathis 4675:

Just wishin' you good luck? now u can end this discussion.

4651:...and im right that youre a farsist (maybe اطلاعات) glo. 4073:

Just wishin' you good luck? now u can end this discussion.

3057:

In 1914, the organisation relocated to larger premises in

1684:

Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

15631:

They have repeatedly engaged in edit wars and constantly

11332: 9845:

It doesn't, but it can be a symptom of a larger problem.

9552: 6992:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Gingeksace#August_2022

5761:

as user is clearly not here to improve the encyclopedia.

2543:

to restore the context. Feel free to also wrap them in a

1680:

Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited

10447:. They have even gone further and made personal attacks 10278: 9649:"specifically ask that *I* review my own block and that 9564: 9294:) overzealously blocking a user based on "vibes", I saw 7572:, which the user goes on to state is (in their opinion) 4918:

efforts. I think they've shown remarkable restraint and

4711:, however, instead of warning/blocking Zemen, joins the 4478:, Your interpretations are not good, I hope you think a 2203:

Show me where the central government approved the name.

2001: 1688:

Talk:Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited

15788:, even after presenting evidence in the form of a diff. 14281:). A block of this user may be warranted. Thank you. 11159:

Characterize me as "pedantic" if you want, but listing

10033:) so I'll keep in mind options like that in the future. 8265:

as sockpuppetry. Do we need a CU to link the two SPIs?

7993:; please add any other evidence you think is relevant. 7352:

2084: Il potere dell'immortalità nelle città del dolore

6151:, which made you immediately start your attacks. Also, 2754:

foundation:Legal:Community Health Legal Defense Program

15156:

which he has also made a speedily deleted article for

14700: 14422: 9703: 9643:

I'd also say that, with this being a new editor, that

9558: 7745:, i.e. passing yourself off as more than one end user. 7576:. They then state the desirability, in their eyes, of 7574:

not a big problem if the author is indeed Enciclopedic

3786:

There is too much here that is strongly suggestive of

2297:

Any issues other than WP:BLUD, use appropriate forum.

14758: 14269:) be checked to see if they are a sockpuppet of the " 13984:

support a 6-month restriction from content assessment

12053:

on 25 September, which were just vandalism and hoax.

11035:

It is exactly the same conduct. I note that you have

10940:" so did sort of tell us what these RfCs were about. 10797:

with no evidence is going to get you in hot water. —

9171:

order that this article should be taken down speedily

6040:

After that comment, I asked them to remember to have

5619:

Sigh. I've blocked them from uploading files too. --

2189:

The proposal was accepted by MOS for Civil Aviation.

33:

Noticeboard for reporting incidents to administrators

15708:"correction of a source diversion for an ethnic pov" 15107:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

13557:

your pending reviews to be claimed by someone else.

13442:

content review, contests, and editathons for a while

13084:

I got called "crazy" by an editor whose sidekick is

12713:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

12055: 11529:

To be totally honest: firstly, if anything I did on

10284: 8836:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

8611:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5970:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5810:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2834:

Seconded. By a Brit who actually lives in Coventry.

2649:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1615:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

15220:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

13249:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

12966:

and I just yanked TPA. Hope this ends the nonsense.

12120:Ain’t Diff 1 just charming… Blocks due, methinks. 8955:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

8897:It was in fact a correction to replace a dead URL. 8696:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

8080:Do you think an SPI would be useful at this point? 6821:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5930:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

5037:The issue was I think caused by your comment here: 3335:

you can't make a case for them like everybody else.

3142:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2966:

Anyone who disagrees is complicit with child abuse.

2608:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

11947:has been adding spam links after a final warning. 10433:Every time there’s push back, Emiya1980 goes into 9653:(contrary to the purpose of the unblock template)" 3863:, a vigorous but fruitless attempt to impress on @ 1686:that were sent to Afd after a merge discussion at 15776:Steven1991's continuing misleading edit summaries 15657:. They have been engaged in slow edit warring on 14181:Support 6 month topic ban from content assessment 13796:, you used "template" and your ping did not work. 12969:NB, I also closed the malformed ArbComm request. 10773:Have a read down what that page has to say, yes? 9651:you don't want a review from other administrators 8424:I have removed all empathist content/claims from 8057:of sources. Even if the users in question aren't 7854:without knowing it was not permitted... Thanks. 7000:- member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement (Empathism) 4668:good that you understood your purpose. good look 4066:good that you understood your purpose. good look 3708:Damn, that GPT 4 has a lot more spirit than 3.5. 2796:Generally on Knowledge here, as long as there is 16208: 14598:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Kirbstyre 63 14547:. I didn’t mean the population version. Thanks! 13914:(review, with assistance from Rollinginhisgrave) 13395:Talk:Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics/GA1 13354:I don't think the editor should be reviewing GAs 9683:did promise a paid editing disclosure in the end 7006:– an associate of Lerro who authored along with 6826:Promotional editing and possible UPE by two SPAs 6709:right after they were told that they engaged in 6356:removed any sources that do not agree with them 6247:Yes, because I removed those poor citations per 6051:you are doing your utmost to corrupt the article 5588:if anybody fancies the inevitable edit warring. 5447:It looks very much like LLM copypasta to me. -- 4686:After the report, they continued the attacks at 2030:does give an impression of burying edit history. 787: 686:When starting a discussion about an editor, you 14993:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2024 September 13 13420:you seem to be taking on more than you can chew 9659:though it's likely too late with that editor. ― 9627:block + unblock request denial + TP revocation 7466:and or Empathism or Empathic Movement members. 6757:of HoI, above) and inability or refusal to use 5357:I've p-blocked them from mainspace for now. -- 3113:"Royal National Institute of Blind People 1868" 2315:the appropriate forum for behavioral issues. — 1351:Persistent MoS violation and refusal to explain 15933:) had repeated reinstated disruptive edits on 12625:specific issues with their most recent edits. 10437:and lobs accusations at others of stonewalling 8232:. Lerro's AfD on Italian-WP occurred in 2018: 7568:where the user also states their opinion that 6431:that I added, which was more informative than 5548:articles, it's not an urgent problem anymore. 4368:Asilvering, Zemen is persistently engaging in 2387:After checking diffs presented by Ratnahastin 749:. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the 672:Do not report breaches of personal information 13933:List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines 13498:, and possibly other content venues as well. 12016:) left no wiggle room for misinterpretation. 9439:was beyond completely unreasonable - look at 8556:"I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine". 8111:, I think we should salt the article titles. 7156:– member of Lerro’s Lerro’s Empathic Movement 2902:banging on my door in the middle of the night 2588:. In all respects its a very poor decision. 2007:I welcome new users when I have time to do so 1744:It's unreasonable to says it is bludgeoning. 53: 14634:WP:Articles for deletion/Renz Nathaniel Cruz 11096:Upon further review of the edit history for 10705:an indefinite ban on my ability to open Rfcs 9959:All good advice. To respond to it in order: 8673:I hope you brought enough for all of us. 😜 6755:I have no interest in some racist xenophobe. 3365:already replied to. Nemov's comment about a 3155:during the ongoing RFC process. Despite the 2744:If the situation is precisely as you claim ( 1935:this user with an obvious inappropriate name 674:on this highly visible page – instead go to 13900:TheNuggeteer has chosen to take a wikibreak 12574:not obvious vandalism? They will not stop. 11809:As a final comment, you might want to read 10938:Outside of this focus on infobox image RFCs 5083:is just tone-deaf. Accusing said editor of 3968:Persistent attacks and provocation by Zemen 2041:, when no such name change has occurred yet 15401: 15278: 15018:: Do these five accounts qualify for SPI? 13598:a whopping 10779 stubs that need expanding 9429:restoring an unreliable, deprecated source 8108:Update, it seems this has happened before 5584:. The user page is probably also good for 5307:so I'm just guessing it's the same issue. 5260:No clue, they're completely unresponsive. 4500:, and you have responded by attacking me. 4290:, which resulted in a barrage of attacks. 3369:is looking better and better. You need to 2613:Off-wiki harassment from article's subject 60: 46: 18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 13818:For me, I suggest two months or three. I 13200:Thank you everyone for clearing this up. 12952:I also blocked SinisterUnion for a week. 12038:Personal attack and (maybe) sock-puppetry 11507:. Call it a coincidence if you want, but 10907:low-hanging fruit to block or CBAN you on 10057:Persistent abuse by User:DanielTokenhouse 9773:case if some form of recidivism exists. ― 9427:contribution by Flight709. This included 8487:Just for full disclosure, I have semi'ed 7346:Donna Giovanna, l'ingannatrice di Salerno 6780:. The personal insults are unacceptable. 6518:How many times do you have to be told of 6499:What? Remove herodotus' figures from the 6352:the user is engaged in. This second user 6057:and replace that as a citation now?.. ... 5742:prevent< more Copyvios, in this case. 5568:Besides the two Copyvio notices removed ( 5046:Has behaved well? No. Have you? Also no. 4161:Nt: I actually wrote that in porsian not 3402:Looks like this ANI notice filed for the 2908:. Checking the article's history, I find 1674:has been blugeoning other editors at the 9399:Looks like they’re being less BITEy per 7679:. Yes, it would be an obvious breach of 7358:Augusto Orrel: memorie d'orrore e poesia 4715:fiesta and accuses ME of bullying Zemen 4663:, they instead resorted to provoking me 4061:, they instead resorted to provoking me 2656:Royal National Institute of Blind People 1941:a mere minute later shows we may have a 1589:) is indefinitely topic-banned from the 1575:Per consensus in the sub-section below, 802:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 15976:Oops, revert 4 was supposed to link to 15916:Edits regarding Siege of Lisbon in 1109 15232:2a02:1811:b731:a200:e934:e172:55ad:98cc 14991:All sorted, did the same that I did at 14527:List of African countries by population 13843:Category:All articles needing copy edit 9657:unblocking and restoring TPA post-haste 7452:, Lerro’s “international poetry prize” 7396:– adherent to Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7312:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7216:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7204:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7186:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7180:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7132:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7126:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7120:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7114:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7088:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7082:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7076:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7028:– adherent of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 6957:– “founder” of the “Empathic Movement” 6935:and his so-called “cultural movement”, 5331:I wish they were responsive; I assumed 5081:while being subjected to ethnic insults 4787:. This is just scratching the surface. 4727:...it's childish to blame me with that. 14: 16209: 15616:they are here to build an encyclopedia 13617:I’ve left Nugget a Talk Page message ( 12985:Thanks to both of you, appreciate it. 12427:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:2456:82FA:42B3:A2B5 12399:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:6173:6F18:90DB:3090 12371:2001:9E8:54FF:6700:180F:EB86:1CC5:F007 12287:2001:9E8:54C0:E700:4544:2C29:4B54:D212 12231:2001:9E8:54DA:3D00:F476:9BDB:952D:28B5 11207:policy, see the main definition: "An 10484:shut up for the rest of the discussion 10121:Special:Contributions/DanielTokenhouse 8515:WP:Articles for deletion/Menotti Lerro 7402:– Member of E Lerro’s mpathic Movement 5942:with a dose of xenophobia by M7md AAAA 5574:), I’d like to add that this user has 3105: 2039:Jagadguru Sant Tukaram Maharaj Airport 1847:Jagadguru Sant Tukaram Maharaj Airport 634:these tips for dealing with incivility 578:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 15980:instead. Sorry for the inconvinence. 15041:one page with a very short shelf life 14094:My mind is sufficiently convinced: I 13965:Christian Albright + De'Montre Tuggle 13323:, they have consistently displayed a 12343:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:5489:43F5:9D4:8D04 12315:2001:9E8:54F4:4900:B15A:EA5:7F4B:676A 12259:2001:9E8:54DA:3D00:834:1934:320F:A324 11572:has admitted you also had a part in. 10430:and about pinging multiple projects. 10115:Just providing a link, the editor is 10100:This is all persistent and targeted. 7539:I only have one further point to add… 7456:, his plays and books and associates. 7426:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7414:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7390:- member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7336:- member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7330:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7324:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7306:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7300:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7294:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7288:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7282:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7276:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7270:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7264:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7258:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7240:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7210:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7174:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7150:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7144:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7138:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7108:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7100:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7094:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 7034:– member of Lerro’s Empathic Movement 6745:I'd like to request an administrator 6034:as you are clearly an involved party. 5056:treated in such a shoddy way at ANI. 2752:have you had a similar experience?), 1841:.Their recent edits where they moved 41: 15355:2a02:1808:5:162a:5d6b:bb70:b454:e8e2 15159:. There is no doubt that User:Ritesh 15103:The following discussion is closed. 13474:", which I meant as a final warning. 12709:The following discussion is closed. 12590:Dracula (1931 English-language film) 11280:You have made three edits to WWII: 11222:It is possible to fully comply with 10450:. The 8th RFC was started today on 8832:The following discussion is closed. 8607:The following discussion is closed. 5966:The following discussion is closed. 5850:in the process of formatting a reply 5806:The following discussion is closed. 5098:by ethno-nationalist POV-pushers. — 4758:Azerbaijan Province (Safavid Empire) 4123:) regarding your attacks against me 2900:Indeed; I couldn't even tell you if 2645:The following discussion is closed. 2033:You haven't explained why you moved 1611:The following discussion is closed. 79:discussion, request, and help venues 8581:Continued TPA abuse after hardblock 6982:AfD merged to Menotti Lerro article 6702:. They are also ironically the one 6691:M7md AAAA has now started throwing 6663:They can see them if they want to. 6059:Your account needs to be suspended. 6055:how worthless persians opinions are 5700:which would of course constitute a 5284:, messages on the iOS app is a bit 4417:of you), and try to start over. -- 2519:removed many of their comments here 723:you cannot currently edit this page 721:You are not autoconfirmed, meaning 690:leave a notice on their talk page; 30: 10298:Well, I blocked the obvious sock. 7454:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7370:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7069:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7060:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7051:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7042:Cilento International Poetry Prize 7021:Cilento International Poetry Prize 6974:Cilento International Poetry Prize 6941:Cilento International Poetry Prize 6695:against me in my other ANI thread 6629:non-Arab sources, which I added, 6032:This requires dispute resolution, 5018:I do not believe I have dismissed 4914:on civility grounds against Zemen. 31: 16228: 14545:List of African countries by area 14492:Pretty much what the title says. 14304:You should probably file this at 12846:a firm warning against factional 11251:Not if I reverted another editor 10276:, which they were informed of by 10145:renounced his British citizenship 10119:and their contributions are here 8061:, or socks, they definitely fail 15638:against established consensuses. 15216:The discussion above is closed. 13501: 13245:The discussion above is closed. 11980:Personal attack and legal threat 11806:because a lot of editors do it. 10027:recent edit-warring case I filed 8951:The discussion above is closed. 8813:Resolved as a misunderstanding. 8692:The discussion above is closed. 6817:The discussion above is closed. 6444:Article from before my changes: 5949:NAC: Subject editor indeffed . 5926:The discussion above is closed. 5848:Thank you. I'll note that I was 5044:You then said to Historyof Iran 3138:The discussion above is closed. 2604:The discussion above is closed. 2347: 67: 15620:push some sort of ethnic agenda 15121:I found Ritesh8040 on the page 14632:Flood of brand new accounts at 13822:don't want it to be indefinite. 12488:Persistent disruptive edits by 9168:has CSD-nommed the article for 8491:so we don't play whack a sock. 6949:Articles created by Gingeksace: 6318:in which they were included ( 6065:After that, I reminded them of 1876:". They have nominated articles 563:Category:Knowledge noticeboards 16202:21:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 16028:21:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15990:21:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15971:21:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15911:21:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15892:21:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15878:21:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15861:21:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15842:21:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15828:21:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15814:21:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15798:20:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15771:19:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15655:their arguments are challenged 15541:18:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15526:17:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15505:Repeated unsourced minor edits 15493:20:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15459:19:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15445:19:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15341:13:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15326:11:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15211:13:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15196:08:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15096:20:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15053:20:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15028:14:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 15005:09:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14987:09:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14960:08:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14945:08:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14626:18:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14610:13:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14586:11:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14572:10:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14557:09:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14539:09:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14521:09:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14506:08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14482:01:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14462:01:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14359:22:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14337:22:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14320:18:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14299:16:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14251:Romani are not Indians (again) 14243:09:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14229:09:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14214:09:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14193:05:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14174:04:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14157:02:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 14133:21:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14118:20:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14104:16:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14090:16:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14064:15:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14034:16:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 14006:12:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13977:08:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13906:Talk:Tumor necrosis factor/GA1 13890:04:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 13876:17:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13857:08:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13836:07:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13803:01:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 13780:00:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 13766:22:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13749:22:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13718:09:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13703:07:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13674:22:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13660:12:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13646:12:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13632:09:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13610:09:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13581:07:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13567:07:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13548:05:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13533:05:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13236:18:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13220:12:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13194:16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13167:09:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13149:09:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13135:08:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13119:06:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13098:05:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13064:05:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13048:04:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13021:04:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 13005:03:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12981:03:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12962:02:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12948:01:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12924:01:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12910:01:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12889:01:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12860:01:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12837:01:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12702:20:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12667:20:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 12652:05:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 12635:03:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 12620:00:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 12602:19:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12584:07:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 12559:22:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 12482:05:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 12462:22:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 12148:18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 12132:14:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 12115:12:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 12032:10:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 11997:10:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 11974:07:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 11957:06:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 11930:21:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11915:20:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11900:19:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11881:06:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11854:01:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11829:10:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11747:01:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11725:01:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11710:01:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11695:00:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11666:00:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11624:00:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11582:00:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11555:00:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11525:00:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 11467:23:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11452:23:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11438:22:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11423:22:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11396:22:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11382:22:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11306:21:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11273:21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11240:21:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11199:21:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11152:20:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11110:08:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11092:08:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11067:08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11053:07:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11031:06:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 11004:06:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 10977:03:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 10950:14:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10932:13:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10891:13:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10856:08:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10821:21:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 10807:17:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10785:08:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10767:Knowledge:Requests for comment 10759:08:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10740:08:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10717:08:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10669:07:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10648:07:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10630:07:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10613:07:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10594:07:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10571:06:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10553:06:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10535:06:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10513:05:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10496:05:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10472:03:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10324:02:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10310:01:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10293:01:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10177:05:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10135:01:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10110:00:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 10049:02:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 9953:21:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9911:18:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9891:18:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9876:16:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9855:16:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9841:13:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9827:13:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9801:12:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9786:07:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9765:06:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9729:05:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9695:08:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9672:05:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9615:04:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9598:02:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9541:01:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9516:01:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9502:00:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9483:00:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9466:22:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9408:01:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9395:00:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9378:22:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9368:22:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9353:22:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9260:02:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 9246:22:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9227:20:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9209:20:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9199:20:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9178:20:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9152:00:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 9136:19:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9020:18:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 9006:18:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8977:18:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8940:16:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8926:14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8907:14:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8893:14:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8879:14:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8859:13:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8825:16:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8800:13:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8785:13:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8683:11:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8662:10:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8646:03:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8631:01:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8600:16:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8571:01:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 8549:17:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 8531:04:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 8503:02:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 8481:01:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 8466:22:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 8441:05:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 8420:03:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 8398:02:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 8380:01:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 8359:18:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8332:17:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8312:17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8291:16:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8277:16:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8245:15:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8221:The SPI report from 2015 that 8217:13:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8189:15:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8175:14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8153:13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8135:13:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8121:13:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8104:13:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8090:13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8075:13:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 8003:13:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7980:12:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7966:12:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7948:12:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7934:12:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7917:11:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7898:11:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7883:11:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7864:11:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7849:11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7834:11:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7819:10:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7801:10:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7787:10:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7772:10:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7737:10:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7722:10:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7707:10:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7671:09:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7656:09:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7641:09:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7626:09:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7612:08:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7560:04:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7530:04:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 7473:, and his “Empathic Movement” 6810:17:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6796:17:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6771:17:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6738:16:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6723:07:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6681:02:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6659:16:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6643:12:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6624:Why aren't the numbers in The 6605:07:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6562:16:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6544:07:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6514:03:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6495:03:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6473:03:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6423:18:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6389:14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 6374:13:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6344:07:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 6328:20:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6301:20:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6287:20:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6273:20:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6243:20:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6228:20:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6210:19:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6176:19:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6142:19:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6108:19:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 6030:Clarify your double standards. 5959:03:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 5921:16:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5895:18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5878:16:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5863:16:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5844:16:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5829:16:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5799:14:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 5771:16:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 5754:21:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 5714:18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 5692:17:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 5629:17:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 5615:17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 5600:20:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5564:20:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5543:19:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5512:17:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5491:17:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5471:17:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5457:17:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5443:17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5429:16:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5415:16:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5391:16:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5367:16:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5353:16:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5323:16:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5300:16:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5276:16:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5256:15:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5241:15:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 5162:20:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 5140:20:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 5126:23:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 5108:19:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 5066:07:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 5033:17:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 5014:17:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4999:16:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4963:15:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4948:15:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4899:12:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4860:04:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 4830:11:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 4801:23:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4780:22:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4751:19:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4595:17:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4565:17:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4551:17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4525:17:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4510:17:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4492:17:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4470:17:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4445:18:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4427:18:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4408:13:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 4386:17:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4364:17:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4340:17:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4318:17:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4300:16:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4274:16:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4252:15:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4237:15:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4215:15:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4197:14:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4175:16:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4157:14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4142:14:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4112:14:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 4090:13:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3952:21:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3927:13:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3903:12:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3877:12:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3851:08:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3822:08:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3803:06:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 3780:20:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3765:17:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3747:15:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3718:05:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 3704:11:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3678:11:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3660:10:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3646:10:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3617:12:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3590:12:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3571:10:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3498:19:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3473:13:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3441:09:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3416:08:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3398:08:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3383:08:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3360:{ec} "Inadvertent"? There was 3356:08:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3330:08:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3308:07:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3275:07:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3255:04:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 3239:07:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3214:07:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 3200:08:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3173:08:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 3094:00:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 3071:20:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 3053:20:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 3039:13:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 3017:16:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2993:14:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2984:13:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2956:13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2939:13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2888:14:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 2872:02:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 2858:18:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2844:18:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2828:12:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2811:10:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2784:11:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2766:10:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2740:10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2720:10:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2699:09:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2638:03:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 2599:10:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 2576:04:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 2554:22:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 2531:18:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 2513:16:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 2496:13:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 2479:04:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 2453:18:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 2429:17:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC) 2374:00:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 2339:05:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC) 2325:16:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC) 2307:16:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2286:08:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2272:06:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2233:08:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 2219:16:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2199:16:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2185:16:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2154:16:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2138:16:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2112:16:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2092:15:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2077:09:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1988:08:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1970:01:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1925:01:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1805:18:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1790:17:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1768:17:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1754:17:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1702:17:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 1604:09:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 1558:23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 1544:Noting prior to archival that 1540:21:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1526:10:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1511:05:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1495:04:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 1473:10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC) 13: 1: 15296:recently reverted my edit on 14096:support a six-month topic ban 13959:Liberalism in the Philippines 11731:"I could've been better here" 10697:dispute resolution procedures 9709:acknowledged their wrongdoing 9425:blindly reverted every single 8706:2601:14B:4101:400D:0:0:0:0/64 8626:Talk/Report any mistakes here 7677:would it be such a bad thing? 7507:Cambridge Scholars Publishing 7408:– member of Empathic Movement 7168:– member of Empathic Movement 6594:attacks. Sounds like we have 6291:Thanks for proving my point. 6189:Edit - added correct version 2964:– and edit summaries such as 183:Biographies of living persons 13509:me if you need my attention) 13470:opened by myself, advising " 13029:) has already been blocked. 13027:Special:Contributions/FckkOf 12867:, you might wanna see this: 11985:Admin intervention requested 11226:while still edit warring. @ 10793:, accusing Nemov of being a 10695:to be fully conversant with 10517:OK, that was a good answer, 9779:"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 9665:"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 9633:"a ... really weird feeling" 8617:User:Cloud software solution 7340:Alessandro Serpieri (writer) 7010:the manifesto of Empathism, 4617:This is the updated list of 3279:Or trying once more to cite 7: 15186:for improving the project. 14488:Potentially concerning user 13845:still has a few days left. 9629:looks absolutely horrendous 9302:had questioned an indef of 8806:A new way to spam Knowledge 8281:That would be a good idea. 8094:Nvm, Educated created one. 7597:someone close to the author 7450:Cultural Pyramid of Cilento 7382:Articles created by Nihaon: 6988:Contemporary Center of Arts 6427:That's what I did. See the 4989:because the user is new. -- 4808:They are if you're using a 2015:welcome new users who have 10: 16233: 14199:Urgent admin action needed 12685:editors "banding together" 11288:but you drive 41, you are 6706:here, making a DRN thread 4974:User talk:Zemen#Simplicity 3007:and their previous block. 2906:waking up the whole street 2463:User:Georgethedragonslayer 2358:appears to have retired. — 1333: 1310: 1305: 1187: 1065: 943: 821: 584: 551:Discussions for discussion 15547:Likely SPA demonstrating 14373:Can someone please block 11962:Editor has been blocked. 11658: 11616: 11547: 11257:"override contributions" 11084: 9962:It's good that we have a 9268:Inappropriate blocks and 9160:Black Axe (confraternity) 8535:Thanks for the reponses. 7578:a bit more of flexibility 7228:– sister of Menotti Lerro 7208:Marco Baudinelli (artist) 4906:Non-administrator comment 3944: 3895: 3843: 3696: 3638: 3609: 3490: 3433: 3348: 3300: 3231: 3192: 2569:right after bludgeoning. 1568:Thewikizoomer Bludgeoning 1320:Sockpuppet investigations 668:demonstrating the problem 559: 434: 366: 283: 175: 94: 75: 15218:Please do not modify it. 15105:Please do not modify it. 13247:Please do not modify it. 12720:Talk:FIFA Club World Cup 12711:Please do not modify it. 12062:the first 6 edits and I 12045:, a new user made their 9296:a thread on his talkpage 8953:Please do not modify it. 8834:Please do not modify it. 8790:/64 blocked for a year. 8694:Please do not modify it. 8609:Please do not modify it. 6819:Please do not modify it. 5968:Please do not modify it. 5928:Please do not modify it. 5808:Please do not modify it. 4922:given the circumstances. 3140:Please do not modify it. 2647:Please do not modify it. 2606:Please do not modify it. 2517:Note that Thewikizoomer 1613:Please do not modify it. 807:ArbCom election RFC 2024 751:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 729:/Non-autoconfirmed posts 243:Scalable vector graphics 77:Knowledge's centralized 15996:Special:Diff/1248500242 15994:There seems to a sock ( 15978:special:diff/1248496914 15531:Blocked for 2 months.-- 15201:Indefinitely blocked.-- 14255:I ask that the account 13955:Typhoon Virginia (1957) 13898:I want to comment that 13479:Talk:A Boy Is a Gun/GA1 13468:September 22 discussion 13454:September 21 discussion 13405:September 15 discussion 12724:User talk:SinisterUnion 12077:. Earlier today, an IP 11815:Knowledge:Wikilawyering 11775:templating the regulars 10801:The Hand That Feeds You 10332:Emiya1980's use of RFCs 10274:Carlisle Public Schools 9418:The rationale provided 9401:User talk:12.25.163.113 7304:Marius Chelaru (writer) 7232:Diego De Silva (writer) 6939:, Lerro’s poetry prize 6617:WP:Disruptive sanctions 6481:, yes, that looks like 6458:WP:Overzealous deletion 6440:WP:Overzealous deletion 6358:WP:Overzealous deletion 5882:The vandalism would be 5817:Special:Diff/1247716582 5134:The Hand That Feeds You 5102:The Hand That Feeds You 5008:The Hand That Feeds You 4848:WP:Disruptive sanctions 4223:, you need to stop the 3283:, while not addressing 2921:Alton Towers for nonces 2705:be in the article, but 2525:The Hand That Feeds You 2507:The Hand That Feeds You 2380:Topic ban proposal for 2319:The Hand That Feeds You 1189:Arbitration enforcement 87:formal review processes 16217:Knowledge noticeboards 15982:Replicative Cloverleaf 15963:Replicative Cloverleaf 15953:the user had breached 15935:Siege of Lisbon (1109) 13912:Talk:Swawilla Fire/GA1 13333:September 7 discussion 12051:2027 Cricket World Cup 12047:first and only 7 edits 12002:Well, that comment by 11325:Hindenburg's talk page 11205:Knowledge:Edit warring 9737:, which was closed as 9605:phrase in the future. 9318:Draft:Nur (influencer) 9183:Clearly runs afoul of 8960:IP does some vandalism 8125:Agreed, well spotted. 7424:Maria Teresa Chialant 6259:argument, again, read 5516:They've now deleted a 5502:as published in 2020. 4810:Dvorak keyboard layout 4784:And now source misuse 3161:closing the discussion 2684:Online Safety Act 2023 1835:. Accusing scope_creep 789:Centralized discussion 777:Start a new discussion 747:Lowercase sigmabot III 676:Requests for oversight 127:Centralized discussion 15647:made a similar point, 15225:Harassment by IP user 14964:I added a request at 14341:Thank you so much. 13923:Tropical Storm Haikui 13735:Knowledge:Peer review 12066:the last one. Then I 11940:Spammer needs a block 11920:everyone's feedback. 11292:breaking the law and 10117:User:DanielTokenhouse 9437:block of StattoSteven 9405:Sincerely, Dilettante 9375:Sincerely, Dilettante 9206:Sincerely, Dilettante 9175:Sincerely, Dilettante 8792:ScottishFinnishRadish 8489:the Menotti_Lerro AfD 7956:Thanks again. Cheers 7512:The Empathic Movement 7172:Luigi Rossi (scholar) 7012:New Manifesto of Arts 6980:New Manifesto of Arts 6968:New Manifesto of Arts 6626:Battle of Thermopylae 6501:Battle of Thermopylae 5171:not reading talk page 3086:~~ AirshipJungleman29 3059:Great Portland Street 2421:Georgethedragonslayer 2116:Pure disinformation? 1939:reporting them to UAA 1710:It's not bludgeoning. 817:Noticeboard archives 662:Be brief and include 655:recently active admin 546:WikiProject proposals 445:Committee noticeboard 394:Personal restrictions 379:Contributor copyright 218:Neutral point of view 15143:and two other pages 14279:User Talk:Oilcocaine 13919:Tropical Storm Sonca 13086:CrazyLoverFutbolLoko 12775:CrazyLoverFutbolLoko 11123:WP:Original research 11014:three-revert minimum 9445:indefinitely blocked 8203:) given the obvious 8065:with flying colors. 7989:I've gone ahead and 7694:, is fooling nobody. 7580:and asks Netherzone 7489:Francesco D'Episcopo 7214:Alessandro Quasimodo 7166:Francesco D'Episcopo 7160:Annibale Giannarelli 6670:"tweaks" in italics. 6550:WP:Gaming the system 6362:WP:Gaming the system 6077:. So much for that. 6044:, so much for that. 4844:WP:Gaming the system 4435:, now from you too. 4099:indictment of racism 3579:Large language model 3118:Science Museum Group 2915:Expostulating about 2126:Cited in the article 797:Administrator recall 620:behavioral problems. 618:chronic, intractable 504:Requests for comment 420:Requests for comment 384:Edit warring and 3RR 374:Conflict of interest 176:Articles and content 15298:Clara Shafira Krebs 13947:AmBisyon Natin 2040 13180:Yoshi24517 (mobile) 12692:You're welcome. ;) 11329:Paul von Hindenburg 11127:WP:reliable sources 11041:only previous edits 10422:Frederick the Great 9441:their contributions 7292:Giancarlo Pontiggia 7268:Vincenzo Guarracino 7178:Vittorio Santoianni 7026:Vincenzo Missanelli 7004:Antonello Pelliccia 6610:We have a case of 6098:to this project. -- 6049:This is a joke and 5787:INDEFFed by Ponyo. 5780:page move vandalism 5497:File:Mala_Beads.jpg 5397:User:Edit the error 5169:User:Edit the error 2539:their comments per 1730:." as mentioned in 818: 651:Just want an admin? 16032:Adding user links: 15188:Unknown Temptation 15106: 14543:Oh sorry, I meant 14517:Northern Moonlight 14470:has blocked them. 14185:IntentionallyDense 14125:IntentionallyDense 13951:Typhoon Nat (1991) 13882:IntentionallyDense 13868:IntentionallyDense 13325:lack of competence 12712: 10699:more broadly, and 10523:dispute resolution 9817:unblock requests. 9086:Ana María Martínez 9078:has made 14 edits 8835: 8610: 8541:WomenArtistUpdates 8511:WomenArtistUpdates 8458:WomenArtistUpdates 7924:Have a great day! 7354:– a novel by Lerro 7310:Giancarlo Turaccio 7280:Annamaria Galeotti 7262:Mario Santagostini 7190:Stefano Pantaleoni 7162:– member ingeksace 7136:Mauro Afro Borella 7092:Vincenzo Schettino 7080:Edoardo Boncinelli 6830:Editors reported: 6747:indefinitely block 5969: 5809: 5759:Support site block 5719:Support Site Block 5698:Support site block 5661:Propose site block 5333:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU 5286:wikt:up in the air 5282:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU 2925:adds a flavour of 2648: 2633:Just Step Sideways 2572:Northern Moonlight 2550:Northern Moonlight 2158:The source noted " 1728:consensus building 1672:user:Thewikizoomer 1614: 1532:Quaerens-veritatem 1503:Quaerens-veritatem 1479:Quaerens-veritatem 816: 646:dispute resolution 404:Contentious topics 203:Dispute resolution 191:Questions on media 16200: 16026: 15104: 14968:a few hours ago. 14349: 14289: 14025: 13997: 13731:broadly construed 13531: 13510: 13364:Rollinginhisgrave 13218: 13205: 13164:Black Kite (talk) 13025:An obvious sock ( 12908: 12835: 12710: 12160:category:Lechites 12154:"Lechitic" editor 12112: 10153:Talk: John Oliver 9360:2804:F1...05:9F62 9158:Legal threats at 9138: 9122:comment added by 8965:User:199.175.18.1 8924: 8877: 8833: 8675:-- Deepfriedokra 8629: 8608: 7444:, his “movement” 7348:– a play by Lerro 7130:Ezio Guaitamacchi 7118:Domenico Giordano 7017:Bernardo Lanzetti 6990:which was G11’d{ 6190: 5967: 5884:this deleted edit 5807: 4909: 4897: 4882: 4878: 4872: 4762:Safavid Kurdistan 3772:2804:F1...A5:98DF 3664:From reading the 3577:Blatant use of a 2990:Black Kite (talk) 2825:Black Kite (talk) 2646: 2619:....UH, SURE...OK 1967: 1612: 1347: 1346: 785: 784: 754: 745:automatically by 612:This page is for 570: 569: 399:General sanctions 238:Resource requests 223:Original research 22:(Redirected from 16224: 16195: 16186: 16183: 16180: 16176: 16149:deleted contribs 16128: 16101:deleted contribs 16084:Nigurd The Ape I 16080: 16053:deleted contribs 16021: 16012: 16009: 16006: 15612:Berber languages 15603: 15576:deleted contribs 15559:Monsieur Patillo 15482: 15481: 15477: 15469: 15434: 15433: 15429: 15418: 15417: 15378:deleted contribs 15351: 15315: 15314: 15310: 15295: 15294: 15255:deleted contribs 15038: 14983: 14977: 14976: 14927: 14926: 14893:deleted contribs 14877: 14869: 14868: 14835:deleted contribs 14819: 14817:Thompson.walkins 14811: 14810: 14777:deleted contribs 14761: 14753: 14752: 14719:deleted contribs 14703: 14695: 14694: 14661:deleted contribs 14645: 14518: 14480: 14460: 14459: 14453: 14452: 14449: 14446: 14439: 14438: 14393:deleted contribs 14342: 14318: 14282: 14271:Oilcocaine group 14155: 14062: 14050: 14047: 14032: 14030: 14023: 14020: 14004: 14002: 13995: 13992: 13852: 13834: 13797: 13778: 13741: 13728: 13658: 13644: 13627: 13596:, and they have 13579: 13546: 13528: 13521: 13520: 13518: 13516:TechnoSquirrel69 13505: 13504: 13499: 13481:quick-failed by 13397:quick-failed by 13314: 13313: 13280:deleted contribs 13264: 13234: 13217: 13215: 13210: 13201: 13190: 13161: 13130: 13117: 13062: 13036: 13035: 13019: 13001: 12996: 12990: 12978: 12973: 12944: 12939: 12933: 12907: 12905: 12900: 12885: 12880: 12874: 12834: 12832: 12827: 12819: 12792:deleted contribs 12772: 12745:deleted contribs 12650: 12573: 12568: 12540: 12513:deleted contribs 12480: 12449: 12448: 12429: 12421: 12420: 12401: 12393: 12392: 12373: 12365: 12364: 12345: 12337: 12336: 12317: 12309: 12308: 12289: 12281: 12280: 12261: 12253: 12252: 12233: 12220: 12219: 12200: 12192: 12191: 12172: 12145: 12140: 12127: 12110: 12102: 12100: 12058: 12021: 11972: 11879: 11758: 11664: 11662: 11656: 11652: 11622: 11620: 11614: 11610: 11553: 11551: 11545: 11541: 11318: 11250: 11090: 11088: 11082: 11078: 10802: 10780: 10658: 10611: 10417:Benito Mussolini 10402:Martin Van Buren 10381: 10354:deleted contribs 10308: 10287: 10281: 10269: 10248:deleted contribs 10228: 10207:deleted contribs 10133: 10018: 9909: 9873: 9865: 9784: 9780: 9761: 9755: 9752: 9749: 9746: 9706: 9670: 9666: 9626: 9594: 9588: 9585: 9582: 9579: 9573: 9567: 9561: 9555: 9539: 9514: 9499: 9494: 9393: 9351: 9191: 9185:no legal threats 9117: 9115: 9114: 9082: 9077: 9050:deleted contribs 9003: 8996: 8922: 8916: 8912: 8875: 8869: 8865: 8848: 8822: 8817: 8774: 8768: 8762: 8756: 8750: 8723:deleted contribs 8672: 8623: 8597: 8592: 8500: 8495: 8378: 8329: 8324: 8274: 8269: 8260: 8207:of the editors. 7727:Thanks so much! 7434:an Nihaon’s talk 7418:Renato Galbusera 7366:Maria Rita Parsi 7328:Angelo Casciello 7286:Giorgio Verdelli 7196:Roberto Guidetti 7124:Francesco Abbate 7105:Giuseppe Gentile 7065:Maria Rita Parsi 6927: 6900:deleted contribs 6879: 6852:deleted contribs 6793: 6786: 6778:indefinite block 6631:and they removed 6602: 6386: 6341: 6188: 6020: 5993:deleted contribs 5892: 5796: 5791: 5749: 5689: 5682: 5595: 5561: 5554: 5525: 5519: 5488: 5481: 5412: 5405: 5388: 5381: 5320: 5313: 5295: 5273: 5266: 5238: 5231: 5221: 5194:deleted contribs 5135: 5103: 5009: 4983: 4955:Horse Eye's Back 4907: 4903: 4885: 4880: 4876: 4870: 4825: 4824:ADroughtOfVowels 4819: 4396: 4225:personal attacks 4193: 4017: 3990:deleted contribs 3950: 3948: 3942: 3938: 3901: 3899: 3893: 3889: 3849: 3847: 3841: 3837: 3820: 3790:and the response 3702: 3700: 3694: 3690: 3644: 3642: 3636: 3632: 3615: 3613: 3607: 3603: 3496: 3494: 3488: 3484: 3439: 3437: 3431: 3427: 3406:is not working. 3354: 3352: 3346: 3342: 3306: 3304: 3298: 3294: 3237: 3235: 3229: 3225: 3198: 3196: 3190: 3186: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3126: 3109: 3036: 3031: 2884: 2798:no legal threats 2790:Succinctly, see 2751: 2737: 2732: 2716: 2696: 2691: 2596: 2594: 2573: 2551: 2546: 2526: 2508: 2459:Also have a look 2451: 2442: 2362: 2351: 2320: 2270: 2217: 2208: 2183: 2174: 2110: 2101: 2075: 2066: 2013:clearly states " 2005:. You say that " 2004: 1998: 1968: 1963: 1957: 1956: 1951: 1923: 1914: 1888: 1699: 1697: 1666: 1639:deleted contribs 1462: 1456: 1450: 1444: 1438: 1432: 1426: 1420: 1414: 1408: 1400: 1373:deleted contribs 1342: 1197: 1079: 1067:Edit-warring/3RR 957: 835: 819: 815: 778: 767: 766: 739: 733: 713: 604: 597: 575: 574: 233:Reliable sources 167:User permissions 147:Main Page errors 142:Interface admins 132:Closure requests 62: 55: 48: 39: 38: 27: 16232: 16231: 16227: 16226: 16225: 16223: 16222: 16221: 16207: 16206: 16193: 16184: 16181: 16178: 16134: 16086: 16038: 16019: 16010: 16007: 16004: 15918: 15778: 15561: 15556: 15549:WP:BATTLEGROUND 15507: 15479: 15475: 15473: 15463: 15431: 15427: 15425: 15357: 15353: 15345: 15312: 15308: 15306: 15234: 15230: 15227: 15222: 15221: 15180:WP:ICANTHEARYOU 15113:User:Ritesh8040 15109: 15100: 15099: 15098: 15072: 15064:User:Ritesh8040 15032: 14981: 14972: 14971: 14878: 14873: 14872: 14820: 14815: 14814: 14762: 14757: 14756: 14704: 14699: 14698: 14646: 14641: 14640: 14637: 14516: 14490: 14471: 14455: 14450: 14447: 14444: 14443: 14441: 14378: 14374: 14371: 14348: 14309: 14288: 14253: 14201: 14148: 14052: 14048: 14045: 14028: 14018: 14015: 14000: 13990: 13987: 13963:DYK review for 13939:Asik-Asik Falls 13851:(Give me info.) 13850: 13827: 13791: 13771: 13739: 13722: 13651: 13637: 13626:(Give me info.) 13625: 13590:Matticusmadness 13572: 13539: 13524: 13514: 13511: 13502: 13378:Thebiguglyalien 13265: 13260: 13259: 13256: 13251: 13250: 13225: 13213: 13208: 13188: 13155: 13129:(Give me info.) 13128: 13108: 13053: 13033: 13031: 13010: 12999: 12994: 12988: 12976: 12971: 12942: 12937: 12931: 12903: 12898: 12883: 12878: 12872: 12848:WP:BATTLEGROUND 12830: 12825: 12777: 12730: 12715: 12706: 12705: 12704: 12687: 12641: 12570: 12565: 12498: 12493: 12471: 12430: 12425: 12424: 12402: 12397: 12396: 12374: 12369: 12368: 12346: 12341: 12340: 12318: 12313: 12312: 12290: 12285: 12284: 12262: 12257: 12256: 12234: 12229: 12228: 12201: 12196: 12195: 12173: 12168: 12167: 12156: 12143: 12138: 12126:(Give me info.) 12125: 12104: 12094: 12054: 12040: 12017: 12004:MihaiVulturul23 11982: 11963: 11945:122.160.165.131 11942: 11870: 11752: 11654: 11648: 11646: 11612: 11606: 11604: 11543: 11537: 11535: 11312: 11244: 11080: 11074: 11072: 10800: 10779:(Give me info.) 10778: 10652: 10602: 10392:Philippe Pétain 10339: 10334: 10299: 10283: 10277: 10233: 10192: 10190:Happymappy12342 10187: 10124: 10059: 9970: 9903: 9869: 9859: 9778: 9774: 9759: 9753: 9750: 9747: 9744: 9702: 9701:I've unblocked 9664: 9660: 9620: 9592: 9586: 9583: 9580: 9577: 9569: 9563: 9557: 9551: 9530: 9508: 9497: 9492: 9387: 9345: 9274: 9197: 9189: 9163: 9088: 9084: 9079: 9035: 9030: 8999: 8992: 8962: 8957: 8956: 8920: 8914: 8873: 8867: 8845: 8838: 8829: 8828: 8827: 8820: 8815: 8808: 8770: 8764: 8758: 8752: 8708: 8703: 8698: 8697: 8666: 8613: 8604: 8603: 8602: 8595: 8590: 8583: 8498: 8493: 8369: 8327: 8322: 8302:help clean up. 8272: 8267: 8263:already blocked 8254: 7995:EducatedRedneck 7377:– play by Lerro 7375:Il Dottor Faust 7334:Tomasz Krezymon 7256:Alberto Bertoni 7244:Maurizio Cucchi 7238:Corrado Calabrò 7220:Vivian Lamarque 7098:Aldo Castellano 7074:Elena Pontiggia 6885: 6837: 6828: 6823: 6822: 6802:RickinBaltimore 6789: 6782: 6763:EducatedRedneck 6650:Canterbury Tail 6600: 6384: 6339: 6305:Proving what? 5978: 5972: 5963: 5962: 5961: 5951:Robert McClenon 5944: 5932: 5931: 5888: 5815:See this move: 5812: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5794: 5789: 5782: 5778:User:Themmajury 5748:(Give me info.) 5747: 5685: 5678: 5594:(Give me info.) 5593: 5557: 5550: 5526:from that page. 5523: 5517: 5484: 5477: 5408: 5401: 5384: 5377: 5316: 5309: 5294:(Give me info.) 5293: 5269: 5262: 5234: 5227: 5179: 5173: 5133: 5101: 5007: 4977: 4940:EducatedRedneck 4905: 4823: 4821: 4817: 4766:Siege of Dimdim 4709:User:Asilvering 4615: 4531:WP:BATTLEGROUND 4390: 4189: 3975: 3970: 3940: 3934: 3932: 3891: 3885: 3883: 3839: 3833: 3831: 3811: 3692: 3686: 3684: 3634: 3628: 3626: 3605: 3599: 3597: 3486: 3480: 3478: 3429: 3423: 3421: 3371:WP:DROPTHESTICK 3344: 3338: 3336: 3296: 3290: 3288: 3227: 3221: 3219: 3188: 3182: 3180: 3149: 3144: 3143: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3124: 3122: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3034: 3029: 2947:Canterbury Tail 2880: 2764: 2756:may be of use. 2745: 2735: 2730: 2712: 2694: 2689: 2651: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2620: 2615: 2610: 2609: 2592: 2590: 2571: 2567:WP:BATTLEGROUND 2549: 2544: 2524: 2506: 2467:WP:BATTLEGROUND 2440: 2438: 2385: 2360: 2318: 2261: 2206: 2204: 2172: 2170: 2099: 2097: 2064: 2062: 2046:WP:OFFICIALNAME 2000: 1992: 1961: 1954: 1949: 1946: 1912: 1910: 1882: 1722:Also the user @ 1695: 1693: 1624: 1617: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1570: 1487:Thedarkknightli 1465:Thedarkknightli 1458: 1452: 1446: 1440: 1434: 1428: 1422: 1416: 1410: 1404: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1329: 1191: 1069: 947: 825: 823:Administrators' 813: 812: 811: 791: 776: 756: 755: 736: 735: 734: 720: 716: 703: 700: 681: 640:their talk page 621: 609: 608: 607: 600: 593: 589: 571: 566: 555: 472:False positives 430: 362: 279: 228:Pending changes 213:Fringe theories 171: 101:Administrators 90: 71: 66: 34: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 16230: 16220: 16219: 16205: 16204: 16188: 16129: 16081: 16033: 16030: 16014: 15992: 15917: 15914: 15899: 15898: 15897: 15896: 15895: 15894: 15848: 15847: 15846: 15845: 15844: 15820:Insanityclown1 15790:Insanityclown1 15786:wiki lawyering 15777: 15774: 15760: 15759: 15752: 15745: 15738: 15731: 15724: 15717: 15710: 15702: 15701: 15694: 15687: 15680: 15555: 15545: 15544: 15543: 15506: 15503: 15502: 15501: 15500: 15499: 15498: 15497: 15496: 15495: 15226: 15223: 15215: 15214: 15213: 15170:TLDR: user is 15110: 15101: 15076: 15075: 15074: 15073: 15071: 15070:after warnings 15061: 15060: 15059: 15058: 15057: 15056: 15055: 15010: 15009: 15008: 15007: 14962: 14929: 14928: 14870: 14812: 14754: 14696: 14636: 14630: 14629: 14628: 14613: 14612: 14593: 14592: 14591: 14590: 14589: 14588: 14541: 14523: 14489: 14486: 14485: 14484: 14370: 14365: 14364: 14363: 14362: 14361: 14343: 14322: 14283: 14252: 14249: 14248: 14247: 14246: 14245: 14200: 14197: 14196: 14195: 14177: 14176: 14166:MaterialsPsych 14160: 14159: 14138: 14137: 14136: 14135: 14106: 14092: 14066: 14039: 14038: 14037: 14036: 13970: 13969: 13968: 13967: 13961: 13943:A Boy Is a Gun 13935: 13929: 13915: 13909: 13895: 13894: 13893: 13892: 13859: 13838: 13825: 13824: 13823: 13810: 13809: 13808: 13807: 13806: 13805: 13784: 13783: 13782: 13720: 13687: 13686: 13685: 13684: 13683: 13682: 13681: 13680: 13679: 13678: 13677: 13676: 13594:WP:PHILIPPINES 13585: 13584: 13583: 13491: 13490: 13475: 13465: 13451: 13450: 13449: 13441: 13427: 13402: 13391: 13390: 13389: 13375: 13361: 13347: 13316: 13315: 13255: 13252: 13244: 13243: 13242: 13241: 13240: 13239: 13238: 13198: 13197: 13196: 13153: 13152: 13151: 13083: 13082: 13081: 13080: 13079: 13078: 13077: 13076: 13075: 13074: 13073: 13072: 13071: 13070: 13069: 13068: 13067: 13066: 13007: 12967: 12891: 12716: 12707: 12691: 12690: 12689: 12688: 12686: 12679: 12678: 12677: 12676: 12675: 12674: 12673: 12672: 12671: 12670: 12669: 12586: 12496:65.102.188.122 12492: 12490:65.102.188.122 12486: 12485: 12484: 12451: 12450: 12422: 12394: 12366: 12338: 12310: 12282: 12254: 12222: 12221: 12198:89.245.176.247 12193: 12170:89.245.176.229 12155: 12152: 12151: 12150: 12134: 12039: 12036: 12035: 12034: 11981: 11978: 11977: 11976: 11941: 11938: 11937: 11936: 11935: 11934: 11933: 11932: 11886: 11885: 11884: 11883: 11864: 11863: 11862: 11861: 11860: 11859: 11858: 11857: 11856: 11841: 11838: 11837: 11836: 11835: 11834: 11833: 11832: 11675: 11642: 11641: 11640: 11639: 11638: 11637: 11636: 11635: 11634: 11633: 11632: 11631: 11630: 11629: 11628: 11627: 11626: 11527: 11493: 11492: 11491: 11490: 11489: 11488: 11487: 11486: 11485: 11484: 11483: 11482: 11481: 11480: 11479: 11478: 11477: 11476: 11475: 11474: 11473: 11472: 11471: 11470: 11469: 11440: 11353: 11352: 11351: 11350: 11349: 11348: 11347: 11346: 11345: 11344: 11343: 11342: 11341: 11340: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11336: 11278: 11212: 11176: 11175: 11174: 11173: 11172: 11171: 11170: 11169: 11116: 11115: 11114: 11113: 11112: 11055: 11007: 11006: 10984: 10983: 10982: 10981: 10980: 10979: 10934: 10894: 10893: 10859: 10858: 10828: 10827: 10826: 10825: 10824: 10823: 10787: 10763: 10762: 10761: 10701:RFC procedures 10686: 10685: 10684: 10683: 10682: 10681: 10680: 10679: 10678: 10677: 10676: 10675: 10674: 10673: 10672: 10671: 10659:For how long? 10650: 10632: 10573: 10498: 10425: 10424: 10419: 10414: 10409: 10407:Hermann Göring 10404: 10399: 10397:Woodrow Wilson 10394: 10389: 10333: 10330: 10329: 10328: 10327: 10326: 10271: 10270: 10229: 10186: 10183: 10182: 10181: 10180: 10179: 10165: 10098: 10097: 10082: 10079:Kneecap (band) 10071: 10067: 10058: 10055: 10054: 10053: 10052: 10051: 10036: 10035: 10034: 10031:first one ever 10023: 10020: 9956: 9955: 9935: 9931: 9924: 9915: 9914: 9913: 9899: 9898: 9897: 9896: 9895: 9894: 9893: 9809: 9808: 9807: 9806: 9805: 9804: 9803: 9731: 9699: 9698: 9697: 9641: 9601: 9600: 9547: 9546: 9545: 9544: 9543: 9486: 9485: 9469: 9468: 9415: 9414: 9413: 9412: 9411: 9410: 9397: 9304:MarcArchives00 9273: 9266: 9265: 9264: 9263: 9262: 9232: 9231: 9230: 9229: 9211: 9193: 9162: 9156: 9155: 9154: 9029: 9026: 9025: 9024: 9023: 9022: 8961: 8958: 8950: 8949: 8948: 8947: 8946: 8945: 8944: 8943: 8942: 8909: 8841: 8839: 8830: 8812: 8811: 8810: 8809: 8807: 8804: 8803: 8802: 8702: 8699: 8691: 8690: 8689: 8688: 8687: 8686: 8685: 8614: 8605: 8587: 8586: 8585: 8584: 8582: 8579: 8578: 8577: 8576: 8575: 8574: 8573: 8561:they are COI. 8506: 8505: 8484: 8483: 8473:David Eppstein 8450: 8449: 8448: 8447: 8446: 8445: 8444: 8443: 8433:David Eppstein 8429: 8426:Andrew Mangham 8408: 8404: 8364: 8363: 8362: 8361: 8346: 8342: 8335: 8334: 8296: 8295: 8294: 8293: 8250: 8249: 8248: 8247: 8209:Allan Nonymous 8197: 8196: 8195: 8194: 8193: 8192: 8191: 8158: 8155: 8137: 8113:Allan Nonymous 8106: 8067:Allan Nonymous 8048: 8047: 8046: 8045: 8044: 8043: 8042: 8041: 8040: 8039: 8038: 8037: 8036: 8035: 8034: 8033: 8032: 8031: 8030: 8029: 8028: 8027: 8026: 8025: 8024: 8023: 8022: 8021: 8020: 8019: 8018: 8017: 8016: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8011: 8010: 8009: 8008: 8007: 8006: 8005: 7954: 7922: 7904: 7870: 7806: 7803: 7753: 7746: 7739: 7695: 7688: 7600: 7593: 7589: 7585: 7547: 7543: 7540: 7537: 7533: 7532: 7485:Andrew Mangham 7428: 7427: 7421: 7415: 7412:Gianni Macalli 7409: 7406:Franco Arminio 7403: 7400:Enzo Tinarelli 7397: 7394:Carmine Padula 7391: 7388:Michele Pecora 7379: 7378: 7372: 7362:Andrew Mangham 7355: 7349: 7343: 7337: 7331: 7325: 7319: 7313: 7307: 7301: 7295: 7289: 7283: 7277: 7271: 7265: 7259: 7253: 7250:Davide Rondoni 7247: 7241: 7235: 7229: 7226:Lucrezia Lerro 7223: 7217: 7211: 7205: 7199: 7193: 7187: 7181: 7175: 7169: 7163: 7157: 7154:Carmelo Strano 7151: 7148:Maurizio Zenga 7145: 7142:Andrea Granchi 7139: 7133: 7127: 7121: 7115: 7109: 7101: 7095: 7089: 7086:Raffaele Nigro 7083: 7077: 7071: 7062: 7053: 7044: 7035: 7029: 7023: 7014: 7001: 6998:Paolo Guzzanti 6995: 6985: 6977: 6971: 6961: 6929: 6928: 6880: 6827: 6824: 6816: 6815: 6814: 6813: 6812: 6800:User indef'd. 6759:WP:SCHOLARSHIP 6743: 6742: 6741: 6740: 6688: 6687: 6686: 6685: 6684: 6683: 6585: 6584: 6583: 6582: 6581: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6571: 6570: 6569: 6568: 6567: 6566: 6565: 6564: 6528:WP:SCHOLARSHIP 6454: 6450:My additions: 6448: 6442: 6436: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6392: 6391: 6348:Ironic, given 6311:WP:SCHOLARSHIP 6253:WP:SCHOLARSHIP 6195: 6191: 6182: 6161:WP:SCHOLARSHIP 6153:Touraj Daryaee 6129: 6122: 6119: 6092: 6091: 6085: 6084: 6063: 6062: 6038: 6037: 5973: 5964: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5943: 5933: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5898: 5897: 5813: 5804: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5781: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5756: 5735: 5734: 5732: 5728: 5727: 5725: 5716: 5664:Edit the error 5658: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5521:copyvio revdel 5355: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5278: 5177:Edit the error 5175:A new editor ( 5172: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5088: 5073: 5068: 5053: 5050: 5042: 5001: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4965: 4935: 4927: 4923: 4915: 4901: 4833: 4832: 4815: 4803: 4782: 4705: 4704: 4698: 4697: 4684: 4683: 4678: 4677: 4671: 4670: 4654: 4653: 4644: 4643: 4633: 4632: 4614: 4611: 4610: 4609: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4512: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4388: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4132:to this site. 4093: 4092: 4076: 4075: 4069: 4068: 4052: 4051: 4042: 4041: 4031: 4030: 3969: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3865:DwilfaStudwell 3805: 3783: 3782: 3767: 3753:DwilfaStudwell 3749: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3706: 3680: 3652:DwilfaStudwell 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3563:DwilfaStudwell 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3408:DwilfaStudwell 3390:DwilfaStudwell 3358: 3322:DwilfaStudwell 3317: 3310: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3206:DwilfaStudwell 3165:DwilfaStudwell 3148: 3145: 3137: 3133: 3132: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3055: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2794: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2760: 2725: 2659: 2658: 2652: 2643: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2614: 2611: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2578: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2498: 2481: 2455: 2384: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2140: 2049: 2031: 1976: 1972: 1928: 1927: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1742: 1735: 1720: 1717: 1714: 1711: 1668: 1667: 1618: 1609: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1546:User:Croystron 1513: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1328: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 985: 980: 975: 970: 965: 959: 958: 941: 940: 935: 930: 925: 920: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 889: 888: 883: 878: 873: 868: 863: 858: 853: 848: 843: 837: 836: 814: 810: 809: 804: 799: 793: 792: 783: 782: 770: 769: 737: 719: 718: 717: 701: 684: 682: 680: 679: 669: 660: 659: 658: 648: 642: 636: 627:Before posting 623: 611: 606: 605: 598: 590: 585: 583: 580: 579: 573: 568: 567: 560: 557: 556: 554: 553: 548: 543: 542: 541: 536: 531: 526: 521: 516: 506: 501: 500: 499: 494: 492:Reference desk 489: 484: 476: 475: 474: 469: 459: 458: 457: 452: 447: 438: 436: 432: 431: 429: 428: 423: 413: 408: 407: 406: 401: 396: 386: 381: 376: 370: 368: 364: 363: 361: 360: 355: 354: 353: 348: 343: 338: 333: 328: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 293: 291:History merges 287: 285: 281: 280: 278: 277: 272: 270:Titleblacklist 267: 262: 261: 260: 255: 245: 240: 235: 230: 225: 220: 215: 210: 208:External links 205: 200: 199: 198: 193: 185: 179: 177: 173: 172: 170: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 124: 119: 114: 113: 112: 107: 98: 96: 92: 91: 76: 73: 72: 65: 64: 57: 50: 42: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 16229: 16218: 16215: 16214: 16212: 16203: 16198: 16192: 16187: 16174: 16171: 16168: 16165: 16162: 16159: 16156: 16153: 16150: 16147: 16144: 16141: 16138: 16133: 16130: 16126: 16123: 16120: 16117: 16114: 16111: 16108: 16105: 16102: 16099: 16096: 16093: 16090: 16085: 16082: 16078: 16075: 16072: 16069: 16066: 16063: 16060: 16057: 16054: 16051: 16048: 16045: 16042: 16037: 16034: 16031: 16029: 16024: 16018: 16013: 16001: 15997: 15993: 15991: 15987: 15983: 15979: 15975: 15974: 15973: 15972: 15968: 15964: 15960: 15956: 15952: 15948: 15944: 15940: 15936: 15932: 15929: 15926: 15922: 15913: 15912: 15909: 15905: 15902:was done. -- 15893: 15889: 15885: 15881: 15880: 15879: 15875: 15871: 15867: 15864: 15863: 15862: 15858: 15854: 15849: 15843: 15839: 15835: 15831: 15830: 15829: 15825: 15821: 15817: 15816: 15815: 15811: 15807: 15802: 15801: 15800: 15799: 15795: 15791: 15787: 15783: 15773: 15772: 15768: 15764: 15758: 15755: 15753: 15751: 15748: 15746: 15744: 15741: 15739: 15737: 15734: 15732: 15730: 15727: 15725: 15723: 15720: 15718: 15716: 15713: 15711: 15709: 15706: 15704: 15703: 15700: 15697: 15695: 15693: 15690: 15688: 15686: 15683: 15681: 15679: 15676: 15674: 15673: 15672: 15671:by the user: 15670: 15669:WP:ASPERSIONS 15666: 15662: 15660: 15656: 15652: 15649: 15646: 15645:Nourerrahmane 15642: 15640: 15637: 15634: 15633:WP:BLUDGEONED 15630: 15628: 15625: 15621: 15617: 15613: 15609: 15604: 15601: 15598: 15595: 15592: 15589: 15586: 15583: 15580: 15577: 15574: 15571: 15568: 15565: 15560: 15554: 15550: 15542: 15538: 15534: 15530: 15529: 15528: 15527: 15523: 15519: 15518:Narnianknight 15515: 15511: 15494: 15491: 15490: 15486: 15483: 15467: 15462: 15461: 15460: 15456: 15452: 15448: 15447: 15446: 15443: 15442: 15438: 15435: 15421: 15415: 15412: 15409: 15406: 15403: 15400: 15397: 15394: 15391: 15388: 15385: 15382: 15379: 15376: 15373: 15370: 15367: 15364: 15361: 15356: 15349: 15344: 15343: 15342: 15338: 15334: 15330: 15329: 15328: 15327: 15324: 15323: 15319: 15316: 15302: 15299: 15292: 15289: 15286: 15283: 15280: 15277: 15274: 15271: 15268: 15265: 15262: 15259: 15256: 15253: 15250: 15247: 15244: 15241: 15238: 15233: 15219: 15212: 15208: 15204: 15200: 15199: 15198: 15197: 15193: 15189: 15185: 15181: 15177: 15173: 15168: 15166: 15162: 15158: 15155: 15151: 15150: 15147: 15145: 15142: 15138: 15137: 15134: 15132: 15130: 15127: 15124: 15119: 15117: 15114: 15108: 15097: 15094: 15093: 15090: 15089: 15084: 15083: 15069: 15065: 15054: 15050: 15046: 15042: 15036: 15031: 15030: 15029: 15025: 15021: 15017: 15014: 15013: 15012: 15011: 15006: 15002: 14998: 14994: 14990: 14989: 14988: 14984: 14978: 14975: 14967: 14963: 14961: 14957: 14953: 14949: 14948: 14947: 14946: 14942: 14938: 14934: 14924: 14921: 14918: 14915: 14912: 14909: 14906: 14903: 14900: 14899:nuke contribs 14897: 14894: 14891: 14888: 14885: 14882: 14876: 14871: 14866: 14863: 14860: 14857: 14854: 14851: 14848: 14845: 14842: 14841:nuke contribs 14839: 14836: 14833: 14830: 14827: 14824: 14818: 14813: 14808: 14805: 14802: 14799: 14796: 14793: 14790: 14787: 14784: 14783:nuke contribs 14781: 14778: 14775: 14772: 14769: 14766: 14760: 14755: 14750: 14747: 14744: 14741: 14738: 14735: 14732: 14729: 14726: 14725:nuke contribs 14723: 14720: 14717: 14714: 14711: 14708: 14702: 14697: 14692: 14689: 14686: 14683: 14680: 14677: 14674: 14671: 14668: 14667:nuke contribs 14665: 14662: 14659: 14656: 14653: 14650: 14644: 14639: 14638: 14635: 14627: 14623: 14619: 14615: 14614: 14611: 14607: 14603: 14599: 14596:I've created 14595: 14594: 14587: 14583: 14579: 14575: 14574: 14573: 14569: 14565: 14560: 14559: 14558: 14554: 14550: 14546: 14542: 14540: 14536: 14532: 14528: 14524: 14522: 14519: 14513: 14510: 14509: 14508: 14507: 14503: 14499: 14495: 14483: 14479: 14477: 14476: 14469: 14466: 14465: 14464: 14463: 14458: 14454: 14436: 14433: 14430: 14427: 14424: 14421: 14418: 14415: 14412: 14409: 14406: 14403: 14400: 14397: 14394: 14391: 14388: 14385: 14382: 14377: 14369: 14360: 14356: 14352: 14346: 14340: 14339: 14338: 14334: 14330: 14326: 14323: 14321: 14317: 14315: 14314: 14307: 14303: 14302: 14301: 14300: 14296: 14292: 14286: 14280: 14276: 14272: 14268: 14265: 14262: 14258: 14244: 14240: 14236: 14232: 14231: 14230: 14226: 14222: 14218: 14217: 14216: 14215: 14211: 14207: 14194: 14190: 14186: 14182: 14179: 14178: 14175: 14171: 14167: 14162: 14161: 14158: 14154: 14151: 14146: 14145: 14140: 14139: 14134: 14130: 14126: 14121: 14120: 14119: 14115: 14111: 14107: 14105: 14101: 14097: 14093: 14091: 14087: 14083: 14079: 14075: 14074:Mike Christie 14071: 14067: 14065: 14060: 14056: 14051: 14041: 14040: 14035: 14031: 14021: 14013: 14009: 14008: 14007: 14003: 13993: 13985: 13981: 13980: 13979: 13978: 13974: 13966: 13962: 13960: 13956: 13952: 13948: 13944: 13940: 13937:DYK noms for 13936: 13934: 13930: 13928: 13924: 13920: 13916: 13913: 13910: 13907: 13904: 13903: 13901: 13897: 13896: 13891: 13887: 13883: 13879: 13878: 13877: 13873: 13869: 13864: 13860: 13858: 13855: 13853: 13848: 13844: 13839: 13837: 13833: 13830: 13826: 13821: 13817: 13814: 13813: 13812: 13811: 13804: 13800: 13795: 13789: 13785: 13781: 13777: 13774: 13769: 13768: 13767: 13763: 13759: 13755: 13752: 13751: 13750: 13746: 13742: 13736: 13732: 13726: 13721: 13719: 13715: 13711: 13706: 13705: 13704: 13700: 13696: 13692: 13689: 13688: 13675: 13671: 13667: 13663: 13662: 13661: 13657: 13654: 13649: 13648: 13647: 13643: 13640: 13635: 13634: 13633: 13630: 13628: 13623: 13619: 13616: 13613: 13612: 13611: 13607: 13603: 13599: 13595: 13591: 13586: 13582: 13578: 13575: 13570: 13569: 13568: 13564: 13560: 13555: 13551: 13550: 13549: 13545: 13542: 13537: 13536: 13535: 13534: 13529: 13527: 13519: 13517: 13508: 13497: 13488: 13484: 13480: 13477:September 27 13476: 13473: 13469: 13466: 13463: 13459: 13458:Mike Christie 13455: 13452: 13447: 13443: 13439: 13435: 13431: 13428: 13425: 13421: 13417: 13416: 13414: 13411:, asking to " 13410: 13406: 13403: 13400: 13396: 13393:September 14 13392: 13387: 13383: 13379: 13376: 13373: 13369: 13365: 13362: 13359: 13355: 13351: 13348: 13345: 13341: 13340: 13338: 13334: 13331: 13330: 13329: 13326: 13322: 13321:in good faith 13311: 13308: 13305: 13302: 13299: 13296: 13293: 13290: 13287: 13286:nuke contribs 13284: 13281: 13278: 13275: 13272: 13269: 13263: 13258: 13257: 13248: 13237: 13233: 13231: 13230: 13223: 13222: 13221: 13216: 13211: 13204: 13199: 13195: 13191: 13185: 13181: 13177: 13173: 13170: 13169: 13168: 13165: 13159: 13154: 13150: 13146: 13142: 13138: 13137: 13136: 13133: 13131: 13126: 13122: 13121: 13120: 13116: 13114: 13113: 13106: 13101: 13100: 13099: 13095: 13091: 13087: 13065: 13061: 13059: 13058: 13051: 13050: 13049: 13045: 13041: 13037: 13028: 13024: 13023: 13022: 13018: 13016: 13015: 13008: 13006: 13003: 12997: 12991: 12984: 12983: 12982: 12979: 12974: 12968: 12965: 12964: 12963: 12959: 12955: 12951: 12950: 12949: 12946: 12940: 12934: 12927: 12926: 12925: 12921: 12917: 12913: 12912: 12911: 12906: 12901: 12895: 12892: 12890: 12887: 12881: 12875: 12869: 12866: 12863: 12862: 12861: 12857: 12853: 12849: 12845: 12844:SinisterUnion 12842:I have given 12841: 12840: 12839: 12838: 12833: 12828: 12822: 12817: 12814: 12811: 12808: 12805: 12802: 12799: 12796: 12793: 12790: 12787: 12784: 12781: 12776: 12770: 12767: 12764: 12761: 12758: 12755: 12752: 12749: 12746: 12743: 12740: 12737: 12734: 12729: 12728:SinisterUnion 12725: 12721: 12714: 12703: 12699: 12695: 12684: 12668: 12664: 12660: 12655: 12654: 12653: 12649: 12647: 12646: 12638: 12637: 12636: 12632: 12628: 12623: 12622: 12621: 12617: 12613: 12609: 12605: 12604: 12603: 12599: 12595: 12591: 12587: 12585: 12581: 12577: 12572: 12567: 12563: 12562: 12561: 12560: 12556: 12552: 12548: 12544: 12538: 12535: 12532: 12529: 12526: 12523: 12520: 12517: 12514: 12511: 12508: 12505: 12502: 12497: 12491: 12483: 12479: 12477: 12476: 12469: 12466: 12465: 12464: 12463: 12460: 12456: 12446: 12443: 12440: 12437: 12434: 12428: 12423: 12418: 12415: 12412: 12409: 12406: 12400: 12395: 12390: 12387: 12384: 12381: 12378: 12372: 12367: 12362: 12359: 12356: 12353: 12350: 12344: 12339: 12334: 12331: 12328: 12325: 12322: 12316: 12311: 12306: 12303: 12300: 12297: 12294: 12288: 12283: 12278: 12275: 12272: 12269: 12266: 12260: 12255: 12250: 12247: 12244: 12241: 12238: 12232: 12227: 12226: 12225: 12217: 12214: 12211: 12208: 12205: 12199: 12194: 12189: 12186: 12183: 12180: 12177: 12171: 12166: 12165: 12164: 12161: 12149: 12146: 12141: 12135: 12133: 12130: 12128: 12123: 12119: 12118: 12117: 12116: 12111: 12109: 12108: 12099: 12098: 12097:Vestrian24Bio 12092: 12088: 12084: 12080: 12079:125.63.87.106 12076: 12072: 12069: 12065: 12061: 12057: 12052: 12048: 12044: 12033: 12029: 12025: 12020: 12015: 12012: 12009: 12005: 12001: 12000: 11999: 11998: 11994: 11990: 11986: 11975: 11971: 11969: 11968: 11961: 11960: 11959: 11958: 11954: 11950: 11946: 11931: 11927: 11923: 11918: 11917: 11916: 11912: 11908: 11903: 11902: 11901: 11897: 11893: 11888: 11887: 11882: 11878: 11876: 11875: 11868: 11865: 11855: 11851: 11847: 11842: 11839: 11831: 11830: 11826: 11822: 11818: 11816: 11812: 11807: 11804: 11800: 11795: 11792: 11787: 11784: 11778: 11776: 11770: 11766: 11763: 11756: 11750: 11749: 11748: 11744: 11740: 11736: 11732: 11728: 11727: 11726: 11722: 11718: 11713: 11712: 11711: 11707: 11703: 11698: 11697: 11696: 11692: 11688: 11684: 11680: 11676: 11672: 11669: 11668: 11667: 11663: 11661: 11653: 11651: 11643: 11625: 11621: 11619: 11611: 11609: 11601: 11600: 11599: 11598: 11597: 11596: 11595: 11594: 11593: 11592: 11591: 11590: 11589: 11588: 11587: 11586: 11585: 11584: 11583: 11579: 11575: 11571: 11567: 11563: 11560: 11559: 11558: 11557: 11556: 11552: 11550: 11542: 11540: 11532: 11528: 11526: 11522: 11518: 11514: 11510: 11506: 11502: 11498: 11494: 11468: 11464: 11460: 11455: 11454: 11453: 11449: 11445: 11441: 11439: 11435: 11431: 11426: 11425: 11424: 11420: 11416: 11412: 11408: 11403: 11399: 11398: 11397: 11393: 11389: 11385: 11384: 11383: 11379: 11375: 11371: 11370: 11369: 11368: 11367: 11366: 11365: 11364: 11363: 11362: 11361: 11360: 11359: 11358: 11357: 11356: 11355: 11354: 11334: 11330: 11326: 11322: 11316: 11311: 11310: 11309: 11308: 11307: 11303: 11299: 11295: 11291: 11286: 11284: 11282: 11279: 11276: 11275: 11274: 11270: 11266: 11262: 11258: 11254: 11248: 11243: 11242: 11241: 11237: 11233: 11229: 11225: 11221: 11217: 11213: 11210: 11206: 11202: 11201: 11200: 11196: 11192: 11188: 11184: 11183: 11182: 11181: 11180: 11179: 11178: 11177: 11166: 11162: 11161:Joseph Stalin 11158: 11155: 11154: 11153: 11150: 11149: 11147: 11146: 11143: 11140: 11137: 11134: 11128: 11124: 11120: 11117: 11111: 11107: 11103: 11099: 11095: 11094: 11093: 11089: 11087: 11079: 11077: 11070: 11069: 11068: 11064: 11060: 11056: 11054: 11050: 11046: 11042: 11038: 11034: 11033: 11032: 11028: 11024: 11020: 11015: 11011: 11010: 11009: 11008: 11005: 11001: 10997: 10993: 10989: 10986: 10985: 10978: 10975: 10974: 10972: 10971: 10968: 10965: 10962: 10959: 10953: 10952: 10951: 10947: 10943: 10939: 10935: 10933: 10930: 10929: 10927: 10926: 10923: 10920: 10917: 10914: 10908: 10903: 10898: 10897: 10896: 10895: 10892: 10889: 10888: 10886: 10885: 10882: 10879: 10876: 10873: 10866: 10861: 10860: 10857: 10853: 10849: 10844: 10840: 10838: 10834: 10830: 10829: 10822: 10818: 10814: 10810: 10809: 10808: 10805: 10803: 10796: 10795:biased editor 10792: 10788: 10786: 10783: 10781: 10776: 10772: 10768: 10764: 10760: 10756: 10752: 10748: 10745: 10744: 10743: 10742: 10741: 10737: 10733: 10728: 10724: 10721: 10720: 10719: 10718: 10714: 10710: 10706: 10702: 10698: 10694: 10690: 10670: 10666: 10662: 10656: 10651: 10649: 10645: 10641: 10636: 10633: 10631: 10627: 10623: 10619: 10616: 10615: 10614: 10610: 10608: 10607: 10599: 10598: 10597: 10596: 10595: 10591: 10587: 10583: 10579: 10574: 10572: 10568: 10564: 10560: 10556: 10555: 10554: 10550: 10546: 10542: 10538: 10537: 10536: 10532: 10528: 10524: 10520: 10516: 10515: 10514: 10510: 10506: 10502: 10499: 10497: 10493: 10489: 10485: 10481: 10478: 10477: 10476: 10475: 10474: 10473: 10469: 10465: 10459: 10457: 10453: 10449: 10446: 10444:or harassment 10443: 10441: 10439: 10436: 10432: 10429: 10423: 10420: 10418: 10415: 10413: 10412:Hosni Mubarak 10410: 10408: 10405: 10403: 10400: 10398: 10395: 10393: 10390: 10388: 10385: 10384: 10383: 10379: 10376: 10373: 10370: 10367: 10364: 10361: 10358: 10355: 10352: 10349: 10346: 10343: 10338: 10325: 10321: 10317: 10313: 10312: 10311: 10307: 10305: 10304: 10297: 10296: 10295: 10294: 10291: 10286: 10280: 10275: 10267: 10264: 10261: 10258: 10255: 10252: 10249: 10246: 10243: 10240: 10237: 10232: 10231:Happymappy123 10226: 10223: 10220: 10217: 10214: 10211: 10208: 10205: 10202: 10199: 10196: 10191: 10178: 10174: 10170: 10166: 10162: 10158: 10154: 10150: 10146: 10142: 10141:Rich Peppiatt 10138: 10137: 10136: 10132: 10130: 10129: 10122: 10118: 10114: 10113: 10112: 10111: 10107: 10103: 10095: 10091: 10087: 10083: 10080: 10076: 10075:Joe (website) 10072: 10068: 10065: 10064: 10063: 10050: 10046: 10042: 10037: 10032: 10028: 10024: 10021: 10016: 10013: 10010: 10007: 10004: 10001: 9998: 9995: 9992: 9989: 9986: 9983: 9980: 9977: 9974: 9969: 9965: 9961: 9960: 9958: 9957: 9954: 9950: 9946: 9941: 9936: 9932: 9928: 9927: 9925: 9921: 9920:The Wordsmith 9916: 9912: 9908: 9907: 9906:The Wordsmith 9900: 9892: 9888: 9884: 9879: 9878: 9877: 9874: 9872: 9863: 9858: 9857: 9856: 9852: 9848: 9844: 9843: 9842: 9838: 9834: 9830: 9829: 9828: 9824: 9820: 9815: 9810: 9802: 9798: 9794: 9789: 9788: 9787: 9783: 9782: 9781: 9772: 9768: 9767: 9766: 9762: 9756: 9741: 9736: 9732: 9730: 9726: 9722: 9718: 9714: 9710: 9705: 9700: 9696: 9692: 9688: 9684: 9680: 9675: 9674: 9673: 9669: 9668: 9667: 9658: 9654: 9652: 9646: 9642: 9638: 9634: 9630: 9624: 9618: 9617: 9616: 9612: 9608: 9603: 9602: 9599: 9595: 9589: 9575:infractions. 9572: 9566: 9560: 9554: 9548: 9542: 9538: 9536: 9535: 9528: 9524: 9519: 9518: 9517: 9513: 9512: 9511:The Wordsmith 9505: 9504: 9503: 9500: 9495: 9488: 9487: 9484: 9480: 9476: 9471: 9470: 9467: 9463: 9459: 9454: 9450: 9446: 9443:before being 9442: 9438: 9434: 9430: 9426: 9421: 9417: 9416: 9409: 9406: 9402: 9398: 9396: 9392: 9391: 9390:The Wordsmith 9385: 9381: 9380: 9379: 9376: 9371: 9370: 9369: 9365: 9361: 9357: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9350: 9349: 9348:The Wordsmith 9343: 9339: 9336: 9333: 9330: 9326: 9321: 9319: 9315: 9312: 9309: 9305: 9301: 9297: 9293: 9290: 9287: 9283: 9279: 9278:recent thread 9271: 9261: 9257: 9253: 9249: 9248: 9247: 9243: 9239: 9234: 9233: 9228: 9224: 9220: 9216: 9212: 9210: 9207: 9202: 9201: 9200: 9196: 9192: 9186: 9182: 9181: 9180: 9179: 9176: 9172: 9167: 9166:Kpako4stories 9161: 9153: 9149: 9145: 9141: 9140: 9139: 9137: 9133: 9129: 9125: 9121: 9112: 9108: 9104: 9100: 9096: 9092: 9087: 9081: 9075: 9072: 9069: 9066: 9063: 9060: 9057: 9054: 9051: 9048: 9045: 9042: 9039: 9034: 9021: 9017: 9013: 9009: 9008: 9007: 9004: 9002: 8997: 8995: 8989: 8985: 8981: 8980: 8979: 8978: 8974: 8970: 8966: 8954: 8941: 8937: 8933: 8929: 8928: 8927: 8923: 8917: 8910: 8908: 8904: 8900: 8896: 8895: 8894: 8890: 8886: 8882: 8881: 8880: 8876: 8870: 8863: 8862: 8861: 8860: 8856: 8852: 8847: 8842: 8837: 8826: 8823: 8818: 8801: 8797: 8793: 8789: 8788: 8787: 8786: 8782: 8778: 8773: 8767: 8761: 8755: 8748: 8745: 8742: 8739: 8736: 8733: 8730: 8727: 8724: 8721: 8718: 8715: 8712: 8707: 8695: 8684: 8680: 8676: 8670: 8665: 8664: 8663: 8660: 8659: 8655: 8654: 8649: 8648: 8647: 8643: 8639: 8635: 8634: 8633: 8632: 8627: 8622: 8618: 8612: 8601: 8598: 8593: 8572: 8568: 8564: 8560: 8557: 8552: 8551: 8550: 8546: 8542: 8538: 8534: 8533: 8532: 8528: 8524: 8520: 8516: 8512: 8508: 8507: 8504: 8501: 8496: 8490: 8486: 8485: 8482: 8478: 8474: 8470: 8469: 8468: 8467: 8463: 8459: 8455: 8442: 8438: 8434: 8430: 8427: 8423: 8422: 8421: 8417: 8413: 8409: 8405: 8401: 8400: 8399: 8395: 8391: 8387: 8383: 8382: 8381: 8377: 8375: 8374: 8366: 8365: 8360: 8356: 8352: 8347: 8343: 8339: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8333: 8330: 8325: 8320: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8313: 8309: 8305: 8300: 8292: 8288: 8284: 8280: 8279: 8278: 8275: 8270: 8264: 8258: 8252: 8251: 8246: 8242: 8238: 8234: 8231: 8228: 8224: 8220: 8219: 8218: 8214: 8210: 8206: 8202: 8198: 8190: 8186: 8182: 8178: 8177: 8176: 8172: 8168: 8164: 8159: 8156: 8154: 8150: 8146: 8142: 8138: 8136: 8132: 8128: 8124: 8123: 8122: 8118: 8114: 8110: 8107: 8105: 8101: 8097: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8087: 8083: 8079: 8078: 8077: 8076: 8072: 8068: 8064: 8060: 8056: 8053: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7992: 7987: 7983: 7982: 7981: 7977: 7973: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7963: 7959: 7955: 7951: 7950: 7949: 7945: 7941: 7937: 7936: 7935: 7931: 7927: 7923: 7920: 7919: 7918: 7914: 7910: 7905: 7901: 7900: 7899: 7895: 7891: 7886: 7885: 7884: 7880: 7876: 7871: 7867: 7866: 7865: 7861: 7857: 7852: 7851: 7850: 7846: 7842: 7837: 7836: 7835: 7831: 7827: 7822: 7821: 7820: 7816: 7812: 7807: 7804: 7802: 7798: 7794: 7790: 7789: 7788: 7784: 7780: 7775: 7774: 7773: 7769: 7765: 7761: 7758: 7754: 7751: 7747: 7744: 7740: 7738: 7734: 7730: 7725: 7724: 7723: 7719: 7715: 7710: 7709: 7708: 7704: 7700: 7696: 7693: 7689: 7686: 7682: 7678: 7674: 7673: 7672: 7668: 7664: 7659: 7658: 7657: 7653: 7649: 7644: 7643: 7642: 7638: 7634: 7629: 7628: 7627: 7623: 7619: 7615: 7614: 7613: 7609: 7605: 7601: 7598: 7594: 7590: 7586: 7583: 7579: 7575: 7571: 7567: 7563: 7562: 7561: 7557: 7553: 7548: 7544: 7541: 7538: 7535: 7534: 7531: 7527: 7523: 7520: 7518: 7514: 7513: 7508: 7505: 7504: 7503: 7501: 7497: 7492: 7490: 7486: 7482: 7478: 7476: 7472: 7471:Menotti Lerro 7467: 7463: 7461: 7458: 7455: 7451: 7447: 7443: 7442:Menotti Lerro 7438: 7436: 7433: 7425: 7422: 7419: 7416: 7413: 7410: 7407: 7404: 7401: 7398: 7395: 7392: 7389: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7376: 7373: 7371: 7367: 7363: 7359: 7356: 7353: 7350: 7347: 7344: 7341: 7338: 7335: 7332: 7329: 7326: 7323: 7320: 7317: 7314: 7311: 7308: 7305: 7302: 7299: 7296: 7293: 7290: 7287: 7284: 7281: 7278: 7275: 7274:Lino Vairetti 7272: 7269: 7266: 7263: 7260: 7257: 7254: 7251: 7248: 7245: 7242: 7239: 7236: 7233: 7230: 7227: 7224: 7221: 7218: 7215: 7212: 7209: 7206: 7203: 7202:Tomaso Kemeny 7200: 7197: 7194: 7191: 7188: 7185: 7184:Edoardo Landi 7182: 7179: 7176: 7173: 7170: 7167: 7164: 7161: 7158: 7155: 7152: 7149: 7146: 7143: 7140: 7137: 7134: 7131: 7128: 7125: 7122: 7119: 7116: 7113: 7112:Victor Lucena 7110: 7107: 7106: 7102: 7099: 7096: 7093: 7090: 7087: 7084: 7081: 7078: 7075: 7072: 7070: 7066: 7063: 7061: 7057: 7056:Omar Galliani 7054: 7052: 7048: 7045: 7043: 7039: 7036: 7033: 7030: 7027: 7024: 7022: 7018: 7015: 7013: 7009: 7008:Menotti Lerro 7005: 7002: 6999: 6996: 6993: 6989: 6986: 6984: 6981: 6978: 6975: 6972: 6969: 6965: 6962: 6960: 6956: 6955:Menotti Lerro 6953: 6952: 6951: 6950: 6946: 6942: 6938: 6934: 6933:Menotti Lerro 6925: 6922: 6919: 6916: 6913: 6910: 6907: 6904: 6901: 6898: 6895: 6892: 6889: 6884: 6881: 6877: 6874: 6871: 6868: 6865: 6862: 6859: 6856: 6853: 6850: 6847: 6844: 6841: 6836: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6820: 6811: 6807: 6803: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6794: 6792: 6787: 6785: 6779: 6775: 6774: 6773: 6772: 6768: 6764: 6760: 6756: 6752: 6749:M7md AAAA as 6748: 6739: 6735: 6731: 6726: 6725: 6724: 6720: 6716: 6715:HistoryofIran 6712: 6708: 6705: 6701: 6697: 6694: 6693:WP:ASPERSIONS 6690: 6689: 6682: 6678: 6674: 6671: 6666: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6657: 6656: 6652: 6651: 6646: 6645: 6644: 6640: 6636: 6632: 6627: 6623: 6618: 6613: 6609: 6608: 6607: 6606: 6603: 6601:---Wikaviani 6597: 6593: 6589: 6563: 6559: 6555: 6551: 6547: 6546: 6545: 6541: 6537: 6536:HistoryofIran 6533: 6529: 6525: 6521: 6517: 6516: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6502: 6498: 6497: 6496: 6492: 6488: 6484: 6480: 6476: 6475: 6474: 6470: 6466: 6463: 6459: 6455: 6453: 6449: 6447: 6443: 6441: 6437: 6434: 6430: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6420: 6416: 6412: 6408: 6404: 6390: 6387: 6385:---Wikaviani 6381: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6371: 6367: 6363: 6359: 6355: 6351: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6342: 6340:---Wikaviani 6336: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6325: 6321: 6317: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6293:HistoryofIran 6290: 6289: 6288: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6265:HistoryofIran 6262: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6240: 6236: 6231: 6230: 6229: 6225: 6221: 6220:HistoryofIran 6217: 6216:WP:ASPERSIONS 6213: 6212: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6200: 6196: 6192: 6187: 6183: 6179: 6178: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6168:HistoryofIran 6165: 6162: 6158: 6154: 6150: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6139: 6135: 6130: 6127: 6123: 6120: 6117: 6112: 6111: 6110: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6100:HistoryofIran 6097: 6090: 6087: 6086: 6083: 6080: 6079: 6078: 6076: 6072: 6071:WP:ASPERSIONS 6068: 6061: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6043: 6036: 6035: 6031: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6021: 6018: 6015: 6012: 6009: 6006: 6003: 6000: 5997: 5994: 5991: 5988: 5985: 5982: 5977: 5971: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5941: 5940:WP:ASPERSIONS 5937: 5929: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5911: 5908: 5904: 5896: 5893: 5891: 5885: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5875: 5871: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5860: 5856: 5851: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5841: 5837: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5826: 5822: 5818: 5811: 5800: 5797: 5792: 5779: 5772: 5768: 5764: 5760: 5757: 5755: 5752: 5750: 5745: 5740: 5736: 5733: 5729: 5726: 5723: 5720: 5717: 5715: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5702:community ban 5699: 5696: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5690: 5688: 5683: 5681: 5675: 5672: 5669: 5665: 5662: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5612: 5608: 5603: 5602: 5601: 5598: 5596: 5591: 5587: 5583: 5580: 5577: 5573: 5570: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5562: 5560: 5555: 5553: 5546: 5545: 5544: 5540: 5536: 5532: 5529:They deleted 5528: 5522: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5509: 5505: 5501: 5498: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5489: 5487: 5482: 5480: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5468: 5464: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5446: 5445: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5413: 5411: 5406: 5404: 5398: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5389: 5387: 5382: 5380: 5374: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5324: 5321: 5319: 5314: 5312: 5306: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5298: 5296: 5291: 5287: 5283: 5280:According to 5279: 5277: 5274: 5272: 5267: 5265: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5253: 5249: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5239: 5237: 5232: 5230: 5223: 5219: 5216: 5213: 5210: 5207: 5204: 5201: 5198: 5195: 5192: 5189: 5186: 5183: 5178: 5170: 5163: 5159: 5155: 5154:HistoryofIran 5151: 5141: 5138: 5136: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5114:HandThatFeeds 5111: 5110: 5109: 5106: 5104: 5097: 5093: 5089: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5072: 5069: 5067: 5063: 5059: 5054: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5040: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5021: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5012: 5010: 5002: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4987: 4981: 4980:HistoryofIran 4975: 4970: 4969: 4964: 4960: 4956: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4936: 4933: 4928: 4924: 4921: 4916: 4913: 4902: 4900: 4896: 4894: 4890: 4884: 4883: 4868: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4840:HistoryofIran 4837: 4831: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4820: 4811: 4807: 4804: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4793:HistoryofIran 4790: 4786: 4783: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4772:HistoryofIran 4769: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4743:HistoryofIran 4740: 4734: 4733: 4729: 4728: 4724: 4721: 4720: 4717: 4714: 4713:WP:ASPERSIONS 4710: 4703: 4700: 4699: 4696: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4689: 4688:Talk:Gordyene 4680: 4679: 4676: 4673: 4672: 4669: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4662: 4661:WP:ASPERSIONS 4657: 4652: 4649: 4646: 4645: 4642: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4631: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4624: 4620: 4619:WP:ASPERSIONS 4596: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4543:HistoryofIran 4540: 4536: 4535:WP:ASPERSIONS 4532: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4513: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4502:HistoryofIran 4499: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4480:little better 4477: 4476:HistoryofIran 4473: 4472: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4462:HistoryofIran 4459: 4456: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4437:HistoryofIran 4434: 4433:WP:ASPERSIONS 4430: 4429: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4405: 4401: 4400:HistoryofIran 4394: 4389: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4378:HistoryofIran 4375: 4371: 4370:WP:ASPERSIONS 4367: 4366: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4348: 4347:significantly 4343: 4342: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4332:HistoryofIran 4329: 4325: 4324:WP:ASPERSIONS 4321: 4320: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4292:HistoryofIran 4289: 4288:Talk:Gordyene 4285: 4281: 4280:WP:ASPERSIONS 4277: 4276: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4262:HistoryofIran 4259: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4195: 4194: 4192: 4185: 4182: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4134:HistoryofIran 4131: 4127: 4125: 4122: 4119: 4118:Talk:Gordyene 4115: 4114: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4100: 4095: 4094: 4091: 4087: 4083: 4082:HistoryofIran 4078: 4077: 4074: 4071: 4070: 4067: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4060: 4059:WP:ASPERSIONS 4055: 4050: 4047: 4044: 4043: 4040: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4029: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4022: 4018: 4015: 4012: 4009: 4006: 4003: 4000: 3997: 3994: 3991: 3988: 3985: 3982: 3979: 3974: 3953: 3949: 3947: 3939: 3937: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3915: 3910: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3898: 3890: 3888: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3848: 3846: 3838: 3836: 3829: 3828:WP:RFCNEUTRAL 3825: 3824: 3823: 3819: 3817: 3816: 3809: 3806: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3731: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3705: 3701: 3699: 3691: 3689: 3681: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3641: 3633: 3631: 3624: 3618: 3614: 3612: 3604: 3602: 3594: 3593: 3591: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3493: 3485: 3483: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3461:WP:RFCNEUTRAL 3458: 3442: 3438: 3436: 3428: 3426: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3363: 3359: 3357: 3353: 3351: 3343: 3341: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3309: 3305: 3303: 3295: 3293: 3286: 3285:WP:RFCNEUTRAL 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3234: 3226: 3224: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3195: 3187: 3185: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3141: 3120: 3119: 3114: 3108: 3104: 3101: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3082: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3032: 3026: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009:86.23.109.101 3006: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2991: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2889: 2886: 2885: 2883: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2799: 2795: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2782: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2749: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2738: 2733: 2726: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2717: 2715: 2708: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2692: 2685: 2679: 2678: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2657: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2607: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2587: 2582: 2579: 2577: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2555: 2552: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2509: 2502: 2499: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2482: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2471:Thewikizoomer 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2448: 2443: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2393: 2391: 2389: 2383: 2382:Thewikizoomer 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2357: 2356:Thewikizoomer 2354: 2350: 2346: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331:Thewikizoomer 2328: 2327: 2326: 2323: 2321: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299:Thewikizoomer 2296: 2293: 2292: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2278:Thewikizoomer 2275: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2267: 2266: 2259: 2258:Thewikizoomer 2256: 2255: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2225:Thewikizoomer 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2214: 2209: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191:Thewikizoomer 2188: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2180: 2175: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2146:Thewikizoomer 2144: 2141: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2130:Thewikizoomer 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2107: 2102: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2084:Thewikizoomer 2080: 2079: 2078: 2074: 2072: 2067: 2060: 2058: 2056: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2018: 2012: 2008: 2003: 1996: 1995:Thewikizoomer 1991: 1990: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1980:Thewikizoomer 1977: 1973: 1971: 1966: 1964: 1953: 1952: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1915: 1908: 1904: 1902: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1886: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1830: 1828: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1797:Thewikizoomer 1793: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760:Thewikizoomer 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1746:Thewikizoomer 1743: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1664: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1623: 1622:Thewikizoomer 1620: 1619: 1616: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1592: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1578: 1577:Thewikizoomer 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1455: 1449: 1443: 1437: 1431: 1425: 1419: 1413: 1407: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1357: 1332: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 979: 976: 974: 971: 969: 966: 964: 961: 960: 955: 951: 946: 942: 939: 936: 934: 931: 929: 926: 924: 921: 919: 916: 914: 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 890: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 872: 869: 867: 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 842: 839: 838: 833: 829: 824: 820: 808: 805: 803: 800: 798: 795: 794: 790: 781: 780: 779: 772: 771: 768: 764: 760: 752: 748: 744: 731: 730: 724: 715: 711: 707: 698: 697: 693: 689: 677: 673: 670: 667: 666: 661: 656: 652: 649: 647: 643: 641: 637: 635: 631: 630: 628: 625: 624: 622: 619: 616:incidents or 615: 603: 599: 596: 592: 591: 588: 582: 581: 577: 576: 572: 565: 564: 558: 552: 549: 547: 544: 540: 539:Miscellaneous 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 511: 510: 507: 505: 502: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 479: 477: 473: 470: 468: 465: 464: 463: 460: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 442: 440: 439: 437: 433: 427: 424: 421: 417: 414: 412: 409: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 391: 390: 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 371: 369: 365: 359: 356: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 323: 322: 319: 317: 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 288: 286: 284:Page handling 282: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 259: 256: 254: 251: 250: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 204: 201: 197: 194: 192: 189: 188: 186: 184: 181: 180: 178: 174: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 118: 115: 111: 108: 106: 103: 102: 100: 99: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 74: 70: 63: 58: 56: 51: 49: 44: 43: 40: 36: 25: 24:Knowledge:ANI 19: 16169: 16163: 16157: 16151: 16145: 16139: 16121: 16115: 16109: 16103: 16097: 16091: 16073: 16067: 16061: 16055: 16049: 16043: 15927: 15919: 15900: 15779: 15761: 15756: 15749: 15742: 15735: 15728: 15721: 15714: 15707: 15698: 15691: 15684: 15677: 15663: 15605: 15596: 15590: 15584: 15578: 15572: 15566: 15557: 15551:behavior on 15510:58.235.154.8 15508: 15471: 15423: 15410: 15404: 15398: 15392: 15386: 15380: 15374: 15368: 15362: 15304: 15287: 15281: 15275: 15269: 15263: 15257: 15251: 15245: 15239: 15228: 15217: 15169: 15164: 15160: 15152: 15139: 15123:Maggie Smith 15120: 15111: 15102: 15087: 15081: 15079: 15015: 14973: 14930: 14919: 14913: 14907: 14901: 14895: 14889: 14883: 14861: 14855: 14849: 14843: 14837: 14831: 14825: 14803: 14797: 14791: 14785: 14779: 14773: 14767: 14745: 14739: 14733: 14727: 14721: 14715: 14709: 14687: 14681: 14675: 14669: 14663: 14657: 14651: 14643:Loewemathers 14578:Wikishmodias 14549:Wikishmodias 14531:Wikishmodias 14491: 14474: 14473: 14431: 14425: 14419: 14413: 14407: 14401: 14395: 14389: 14383: 14376:23.16.69.241 14372: 14368:23.16.69.241 14344: 14312: 14311: 14284: 14263: 14254: 14202: 14180: 14142: 14095: 14069: 13983: 13971: 13927:Typhoon Tess 13863:TheNuggeteer 13819: 13816:Weak support 13815: 13730: 13708:problem. -- 13690: 13614: 13554:TheNuggeteer 13525: 13515: 13495: 13492: 13486: 13471: 13461: 13437: 13433: 13423: 13419: 13418:Wizardman: " 13412: 13381: 13367: 13353: 13343: 13342:Freedom4U: " 13317: 13306: 13300: 13294: 13288: 13282: 13276: 13270: 13262:TheNuggeteer 13246: 13228: 13227: 13202: 13187: 13111: 13110: 13056: 13055: 13013: 13012: 12986: 12929: 12870: 12812: 12806: 12800: 12794: 12788: 12782: 12765: 12759: 12753: 12747: 12741: 12735: 12717: 12708: 12644: 12643: 12533: 12527: 12521: 12515: 12509: 12503: 12494: 12474: 12473: 12452: 12441: 12435: 12413: 12407: 12385: 12379: 12357: 12351: 12329: 12323: 12301: 12295: 12273: 12267: 12245: 12239: 12224:Rangeblock? 12223: 12212: 12206: 12184: 12178: 12157: 12106: 12105: 12096: 12095: 12043:User:ICT Fan 12041: 12010: 11983: 11966: 11965: 11943: 11873: 11872: 11846:WhatamIdoing 11819: 11808: 11796: 11788: 11779: 11771: 11767: 11751: 11739:WhatamIdoing 11682: 11659: 11649: 11617: 11607: 11570:WhatamIdoing 11548: 11538: 11531:World War II 11497:World War II 11459:WhatamIdoing 11430:WhatamIdoing 11410: 11407:World War II 11401: 11388:WhatamIdoing 11321:World War II 11315:WhatamIdoing 11298:WhatamIdoing 11293: 11289: 11256: 11252: 11247:WhatamIdoing 11232:WhatamIdoing 11219: 11215: 11208: 11187:World War II 11144: 11141: 11138: 11135: 11132: 11130: 11098:World War II 11085: 11075: 10969: 10966: 10963: 10960: 10957: 10955: 10937: 10924: 10921: 10918: 10915: 10912: 10910: 10883: 10880: 10877: 10874: 10871: 10869: 10833:WP:RFCBEFORE 10798: 10794: 10770: 10704: 10692: 10687: 10605: 10604: 10578:Edward Heath 10483: 10460: 10452:Edward Heath 10435:defense mode 10426: 10387:Edward Heath 10374: 10368: 10362: 10356: 10350: 10344: 10335: 10302: 10301: 10262: 10256: 10250: 10244: 10238: 10221: 10215: 10209: 10203: 10197: 10188: 10160: 10156: 10144: 10127: 10126: 10099: 10060: 10011: 10005: 9999: 9993: 9987: 9981: 9975: 9905: 9883:CoffeeCrumbs 9870: 9862:CoffeeCrumbs 9847:CoffeeCrumbs 9833:AusLondonder 9819:CoffeeCrumbs 9793:AusLondonder 9776: 9775: 9771:WP:ADMINCOND 9738: 9662: 9661: 9656: 9650: 9648: 9636: 9632: 9628: 9533: 9532: 9510: 9458:AusLondonder 9444: 9389: 9347: 9331: 9322: 9310: 9288: 9275: 9238:AndyTheGrump 9169: 9164: 9146:(she/they) ( 9144:Guessitsavis 9118:— Preceding 9083:to the page 9070: 9064: 9058: 9052: 9046: 9040: 9031: 9000: 8993: 8963: 8952: 8843: 8840: 8831: 8743: 8737: 8731: 8725: 8719: 8713: 8704: 8693: 8657: 8652: 8615: 8606: 8555: 8451: 8372: 8371: 8298: 8297: 8162: 8145:CoffeeCrumbs 8096:QwertyForest 8082:QwertyForest 8049: 7742: 7691: 7684: 7676: 7596: 7592:themselves). 7581: 7577: 7573: 7569: 7516: 7511: 7493: 7479: 7468: 7464: 7439: 7429: 7381: 7380: 7322:Anna Bianchi 7316:Elvio Annese 7298:Rosanna Lupi 7103: 7047:Umberto Curi 7032:Enrico Testa 6948: 6930: 6920: 6914: 6908: 6902: 6896: 6890: 6872: 6866: 6860: 6854: 6848: 6842: 6829: 6818: 6790: 6783: 6777: 6754: 6746: 6744: 6669: 6664: 6654: 6649: 6621: 6615:followed by 6612:WP:BOOMERANG 6599: 6587: 6586: 6383: 6379: 6364:twice over? 6353: 6350:Edit warring 6338: 6197:Discussion: 6184:Prior Page: 6125: 6115: 6093: 6064: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6039: 6033: 6029: 6022: 6013: 6007: 6001: 5995: 5989: 5983: 5974: 5965: 5927: 5889: 5814: 5805: 5758: 5738: 5718: 5697: 5686: 5679: 5670: 5660: 5659: 5558: 5551: 5485: 5478: 5409: 5402: 5385: 5378: 5317: 5310: 5270: 5263: 5248:QwertyForest 5235: 5228: 5224: 5214: 5208: 5202: 5196: 5190: 5184: 5174: 5131: 5099: 5095: 5084: 5080: 5070: 5045: 5038: 5019: 5005: 4938:the future. 4911: 4886: 4881:isinterested 4873: 4835: 4834: 4814: 4813: 4805: 4735: 4730: 4725: 4722: 4706: 4685: 4658: 4655: 4634: 4616: 4414: 4351: 4346: 4305: 4229:QwertyForest 4190: 4188: 4162: 4056: 4053: 4032: 4019: 4010: 4004: 3998: 3992: 3986: 3980: 3971: 3945: 3935: 3896: 3886: 3844: 3834: 3814: 3813: 3734:WP:BOOMARANG 3697: 3687: 3670:R0paire-wiki 3639: 3629: 3610: 3600: 3534:environment. 3491: 3481: 3465:CoffeeCrumbs 3434: 3424: 3404:User conduct 3403: 3367:WP:BOOMARANG 3361: 3349: 3339: 3301: 3291: 3262: 3250: 3245: 3232: 3222: 3218:Good grief. 3193: 3183: 3150: 3147:User conduct 3139: 3123:. Retrieved 3116: 3107: 3099: 3063:Traumnovelle 3045:Traumnovelle 2965: 2961: 2951: 2946: 2920: 2916: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2881: 2879: 2850:Phil Bridger 2817: 2781: 2775:data brokers 2713: 2711: 2707:dominates it 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2644: 2605: 2589: 2580: 2562: 2545:<del: --> 2522: 2504: 2500: 2483: 2444: 2434: 2398: 2386: 2352: 2316: 2312: 2294: 2264: 2263: 2210: 2176: 2159: 2103: 2068: 2035:Pune airport 2021:constructive 2020: 2016: 2014: 2011:WP:WELCOMING 2006: 1958: 1947: 1916: 1893: 1885:CharlieMehta 1873: 1843:Pune airport 1817: 1782:CoffeeCrumbs 1777: 1707: 1692: 1669: 1659: 1653: 1647: 1641: 1635: 1629: 1610: 1583: 1476: 1402: 1393: 1387: 1381: 1375: 1369: 1363: 1354: 1306:Other links 944: 774: 773: 738: 726: 722: 702:You may use 687: 685: 683: 671: 663: 650: 626: 617: 613: 610: 561: 509:Village pump 497:New articles 462:Edit filters 441:Arbitration 367:User conduct 152:Open proxies 109: 69:Noticeboards 35: 16132:ElGoblino88 15998:), perhaps 15949:) And with 15635:discussions 15176:WP:SELFCITE 15068:WP:SELFCITE 14875:Editlife1tr 14512:Link to rev 14100:Elias / PSA 13973:Elias / PSA 13886:Elias / PSA 13799:Elias / PSA 13563:Elias / PSA 13494:propose an 13485:, stating " 13105:User:Fa30sp 12977:Mississippi 12144:Mississippi 11794:pointless. 11762:WP:involved 11683:encouraging 10848:Bon courage 10155:they wrote 10149:John Oliver 10084:The user's 9991:protections 9945:Yngvadottir 9623:Sigmaxalpha 9571:Sigmaxalpha 9498:Mississippi 9433:then abused 9272:by Graham87 9033:Musicfan800 8821:Mississippi 8596:Mississippi 8499:Mississippi 8345:guidelines. 8328:Mississippi 8273:Mississippi 8052:Gish Gallop 7991:created one 7038:Elio Pecora 6700:WP:HOUNDING 6316:new article 6096:netpositive 5795:Mississippi 4991:Floquenbeam 4912:short block 4842:engages in 4541:behaviour. 4191:Ravenswing 4130:netpositive 3861:Bon courage 3795:Bon courage 3732:Probably a 2882:Ravenswing 2864:– robertsky 2836:Narky Blert 2803:– robertsky 2714:Ravenswing 2593:scope_creep 2461:. I advice 2441:Ratnahastin 2207:Ratnahastin 2173:Ratnahastin 2100:Ratnahastin 2065:Ratnahastin 1945:case here. 1913:Ratnahastin 1881:created by 1774:WP:BLUDGEON 1724:Scope creep 1696:scope_creep 725:. Instead, 455:Enforcement 411:Sockpuppets 316:Importation 275:Translation 187:Copyrights 122:Bureaucrats 16167:block user 16161:filter log 16119:block user 16113:filter log 16071:block user 16065:filter log 15959:WP:NOTHERE 15937:. (diffs: 15884:Steven1991 15866:Steven1991 15853:Steven1991 15834:Steven1991 15806:Steven1991 15594:block user 15588:filter log 15408:block user 15384:filter log 15285:block user 15261:filter log 15184:WP:NOTHERE 15045:Left guide 15035:Borgenland 15020:Borgenland 14952:Geschichte 14937:Left guide 14917:block user 14911:filter log 14859:block user 14853:filter log 14801:block user 14795:filter log 14743:block user 14737:filter log 14685:block user 14679:filter log 14564:Sirocco745 14498:Sirocco745 14468:User:Alexf 14429:block user 14399:filter log 13820:definitely 13733:" include 13710:asilvering 13666:asilvering 13602:asilvering 13460:, asking " 13456:opened by 13430:Asilvering 13407:opened by 13335:opened by 13304:block user 13298:filter log 13172:Black Kite 13141:asilvering 12989:Yoshi24517 12932:Yoshi24517 12873:Yoshi24517 12850:behavior. 12810:block user 12804:filter log 12763:block user 12757:filter log 12683:WP:NOTHERE 12531:block user 12525:filter log 11989:Left guide 11811:WP:NOTBURO 11509:Remsense's 11216:repeatedly 10902:competency 10638:doing so. 10456:discussion 10372:block user 10366:filter log 10260:block user 10254:page moves 10219:block user 10213:page moves 10185:Happymappy 10003:page moves 9553:Lisabofita 9276:After the 9068:block user 9062:filter log 8885:tgeorgescu 8851:tgeorgescu 8741:block user 8735:filter log 8563:Netherzone 8537:Netherzone 8523:Netherzone 8403:adherents. 8390:Netherzone 8319:Netherzone 8304:Netherzone 8283:Netherzone 8237:Netherzone 7958:Gingeksace 7926:Gingeksace 7890:Gingeksace 7856:Gingeksace 7826:Gingeksace 7793:Gingeksace 7779:Gingeksace 7729:Gingeksace 7714:Gingeksace 7663:Gingeksace 7618:Gingeksace 7496:Netherzone 6918:block user 6912:filter log 6870:block user 6864:filter log 6835:Gingeksace 6751:WP:NOTHERE 6698:. This is 6598:case here. 6532:WP:NOTHERE 6487:asilvering 6415:asilvering 6011:block user 6005:filter log 5913:Bobby Cohn 5870:asilvering 5855:Bobby Cohn 5836:asilvering 5821:Bobby Cohn 5739:definitely 5621:asilvering 5449:asilvering 5421:asilvering 5373:Asilvering 5359:asilvering 5212:block user 5206:filter log 5118:asilvering 5096:repeatedly 5092:sealioning 5049:grotesque. 5025:asilvering 4789:WP:NOTHERE 4739:WP:NOTHERE 4583:Asilvering 4419:asilvering 4393:Asilvering 4356:asilvering 4354:upset. -- 4310:asilvering 4284:WP:NOTHERE 4266:asilvering 4203:Ravenswing 4008:block user 4002:filter log 3788:WP:NOTHERE 3757:asilvering 3100:References 2999:Black Kite 2748:Headhitter 2629:WP:T&S 2537:reinstated 2361:Tenryuu 🐲 1933:Welcoming 1657:block user 1651:filter log 1391:block user 1385:filter log 714:to do so. 710:ANI-notice 696:not enough 653:Contact a 478:Questions 358:Undeletion 351:Miscellany 336:Categories 311:Protection 16173:block log 16125:block log 16077:block log 16002:as well. 15904:Altenmann 15870:Cullen328 15600:block log 15414:block log 15291:block log 14923:block log 14865:block log 14807:block log 14749:block log 14691:block log 14618:Cullen328 14435:block log 14351:Willondon 14325:Willondon 14291:Willondon 14150:🍗TheNugg 13917:GANs for 13829:🍗TheNugg 13794:Cullen328 13773:🍗TheNugg 13758:Cullen328 13725:Cullen328 13695:Cullen328 13653:🍗TheNugg 13639:🍗TheNugg 13574:🍗TheNugg 13541:🍗TheNugg 13413:slow down 13409:Wizardman 13399:Arconning 13337:Freedom4U 13310:block log 13189:Very Busy 13090:Cullen328 13000:Very Busy 12954:Cullen328 12943:Very Busy 12916:Cullen328 12894:Cullen328 12884:Very Busy 12865:Cullen328 12852:Cullen328 12816:block log 12769:block log 12681:Group of 12537:block log 12468:Altenmann 12455:Altenmann 12075:talk page 12073:on their 12071:a warning 11867:Emiya1980 11821:Nil Einne 11755:Emiya1980 11717:Emiya1980 11687:Emiya1980 11574:Emiya1980 11517:Emiya1980 11444:Emiya1980 11415:Emiya1980 11374:Emiya1980 11265:Emiya1980 11261:"Be bold" 11253:only once 11214:The word 11191:Emiya1980 11165:Big Three 11157:Snow Rise 11119:Emiya1980 11102:Emiya1980 11059:Emiya1980 11023:Emiya1980 10942:Nil Einne 10865:WP:BEFORE 10751:Cullen328 10747:Emiya1980 10732:Emiya1980 10723:Cullen328 10709:Cullen328 10689:Emiya1980 10661:Emiya1980 10640:Emiya1980 10635:Cullen328 10622:Cullen328 10618:Emiya1980 10586:Emiya1980 10563:Cullen328 10559:Emiya1980 10545:Emiya1980 10527:Cullen328 10519:Emiya1980 10505:Emiya1980 10501:Cullen328 10488:Cullen328 10480:Emiya1980 10378:block log 10337:Emiya1980 10316:Cullen328 10290:GrayStorm 10279:Willondon 10266:block log 10225:block log 10169:Cullen328 9997:deletions 9968:Paul Erik 9565:Ainguyen9 9325:Flight709 9190:WikiDan61 9074:block log 8777:Waxworker 8747:block log 8669:Cullen328 8638:Cullen328 8341:articles. 8299:Question: 8055:WP:REFBOM 7685:alternate 7475:Empathism 7446:Empathism 6964:Empathism 6959:Empathism 6945:Empathism 6937:Empathism 6924:block log 6876:block log 6776:Agree on 6730:M7md AAAA 6704:WP:GAMING 6673:M7md AAAA 6635:M7md AAAA 6554:M7md AAAA 6506:M7md AAAA 6479:M7md AAAA 6465:M7md AAAA 6407:M7md AAAA 6366:M7md AAAA 6320:M7md AAAA 6279:M7md AAAA 6257:WP:REHASH 6235:M7md AAAA 6202:M7md AAAA 6134:M7md AAAA 6116:worthless 6017:block log 5976:M7md AAAA 5763:Tavantius 5586:WP:CSD#U5 5371:Thanks, @ 5218:block log 4852:M7md AAAA 4163:poor-sian 4014:block log 3548:followed. 3281:WP:MEDPOP 3125:11 August 2818:massively 2687:platform? 2625:WP:ARBCOM 2541:WP:REDACT 2465:to avoid 2002:MrSchimpf 1825:badgering 1823:Constant 1663:block log 1550:Folly Mox 1518:Nicholas0 1483:Nicholas0 1397:block log 1356:Croystron 945:Incidents 657:directly. 587:Shortcuts 524:Proposals 519:Technical 482:Help desk 467:Requested 426:Vandalism 416:Usernames 389:Sanctions 341:Templates 331:Redirects 258:Whitelist 253:Blacklist 162:Oversight 137:Education 110:Incidents 83:dashboard 16211:Category 16143:contribs 16095:contribs 16047:contribs 16036:Mamilios 15951:revert 4 15947:revert 3 15943:revert 2 15939:revert 1 15931:contribs 15921:Mamilios 15570:contribs 15366:contribs 15243:contribs 15229:IP user 14887:contribs 14829:contribs 14771:contribs 14713:contribs 14655:contribs 14494:Hexerade 14387:contribs 14267:contribs 14233:Thanks! 14221:Johnuniq 14082:contribs 14059:contribs 13931:FLC for 13770:Not me. 13500:(please 13274:contribs 13044:contribs 13032:Chaotic 12786:contribs 12739:contribs 12612:Johnuniq 12543:WP:ISBNs 12507:contribs 12439:contribs 12411:contribs 12383:contribs 12355:contribs 12327:contribs 12299:contribs 12271:contribs 12243:contribs 12210:contribs 12182:contribs 12064:reverted 12060:reverted 12014:contribs 11801:or even 11791:WP:AN/EW 11783:WP:AN/EW 11671:Remsense 11650:Remsense 11608:Remsense 11562:Remsense 11539:Remsense 11501:Remsense 11263:policy? 11209:edit war 11076:Remsense 11019:Nick-D's 10348:contribs 10242:contribs 10201:contribs 10073:For the 10041:Graham87 9979:contribs 9735:May 2022 9725:contribs 9687:Graham87 9679:this one 9645:Graham87 9640:comment. 9607:Graham87 9475:Graham87 9449:WP:INDEF 9335:contribs 9314:contribs 9292:contribs 9282:Graham87 9195:ReadMe!! 9132:contribs 9120:unsigned 9044:contribs 9012:Luhanopi 8994:Schazjmd 8984:Luhanopi 8969:Luhanopi 8717:contribs 8141:WP:QUACK 7869:deceive? 7755:Further 7675:You ask 6894:contribs 6846:contribs 6784:Schazjmd 6592:personal 6548:Begone 6520:WP:OTHER 6337:attacks. 6335:personal 6261:WP:OTHER 5987:contribs 5680:Schazjmd 5674:contribs 5579:declined 5552:Schazjmd 5531:Schazjmd 5479:Schazjmd 5403:Schazjmd 5379:Schazjmd 5311:Schazjmd 5264:Schazjmd 5229:Schazjmd 5188:contribs 5085:bullying 5077:WP:CIVIL 5020:anything 4760:" with " 3984:contribs 3936:Remsense 3914:Remsense 3909:Turmeric 3887:Remsense 3857:Remsense 3835:Remsense 3808:Remsense 3710:Levivich 3688:Remsense 3630:Remsense 3601:Remsense 3583:Bishonen 3504:Remsense 3482:Remsense 3425:Remsense 3340:Remsense 3292:Remsense 3223:Remsense 3184:Remsense 3121:. London 2821:WP:UNDUE 2762:Contribs 2295:Comment: 2169:issues. 2143:Citation 1778:back off 1708:Comment: 1633:contribs 1587:contribs 1367:contribs 1194:archives 1072:archives 950:archives 828:archives 759:archives 753:subpage. 743:archived 529:Idea lab 487:Teahouse 450:Requests 326:Articles 196:Problems 15763:Skitash 15659:Algeria 15608:Berbers 15553:Algeria 15478:hypeboy 15430:hypeboy 15352:The IP 15311:hypeboy 15172:WP:SPAM 15016:Comment 14966:WP:RPPI 14701:TOOLINK 14257:Wentigo 14153:eteer🍗 14102:🏕️🪐 14086:library 14024:he/they 14012:WP:DCWC 13996:he/they 13975:🏕️🪐 13888:🏕️🪐 13832:eteer🍗 13801:🏕️🪐 13776:eteer🍗 13691:Support 13656:eteer🍗 13642:eteer🍗 13577:eteer🍗 13565:🏕️🪐 13544:eteer🍗 13507:mention 13446:message 13386:message 13372:message 13358:message 13214:MemeGod 12904:MemeGod 12831:MemeGod 12608:WP:VAND 12594:Belbury 12083:ICT Fan 12019:Blocked 11674:reason. 9704:Imtisig 9559:Imtisig 9384:WP:RFAR 9342:WP:BITE 9270:WP:BITE 9215:WP:DOLT 9099:history 8932:MrOllie 8225:found: 7953:myself. 7681:WP:SOCK 7588:issues? 6596:nothere 6588:Comment 5463:Arjayay 4986:WP:BITE 4926:errors. 4877:ctively 4836:Comment 3751:Sorry @ 3520:return. 3362:nothing 3157:warning 2972:WP:NPOV 2581:Comment 2563:Support 2501:Support 2484:Support 2435:Support 2017:already 1962:chatter 1818:Comment 1732:WP:BLUD 1670:Editor 1325:Backlog 712:}} ~~~~ 692:pinging 602:WP:AN/I 296:Mergers 95:General 16197:✏️cons 16191:💬pros 16023:✏️cons 16017:💬pros 15667:s and 15624:WP:SPA 15622:as an 15618:or to 14997:Daniel 14974:hi :-) 14759:Ixo490 14345:signed 14329:Drmies 14306:WP:SPI 14285:signed 14235:Jeppiz 14219:Done. 14206:Jeppiz 14110:Drmies 14046:Vacant 14019:sawyer 13991:sawyer 13957:, and 13925:, and 13792:Also @ 13788:Rjjiii 13754:Rjjiii 13729:does " 13438:avoid 13350:Drmies 12694:Drmies 12091:diff 2 12089:& 12087:diff 1 12024:Cabayi 11803:WP:0RR 11799:WP:1RR 11702:Nick-D 11679:Nick-D 11566:Nick-D 11513:Nick-D 11505:Nick-D 11228:Nick-D 11224:WP:3RR 11045:Nick-D 10996:Nick-D 10843:WP:1AM 10791:WP:NPA 10102:UaMaol 10086:second 10009:rights 9985:blocks 9814:WP:AGF 9562:, and 9527:WP:ANI 9525:, not 9453:331dot 9298:where 9280:about 9252:DMacks 9219:DMacks 9001:(talk) 8988:WP:AIV 8915:spryde 8868:spryde 8454:WP:TNT 8412:Axad12 8351:Axad12 8223:Axad12 8205:WP:COI 8201:WP:AFD 8181:Axad12 8167:Axad12 8127:Axad12 8063:WP:CIR 8059:WP:COI 7986:Axad12 7972:Axad12 7940:Axad12 7909:Axad12 7903:users? 7875:Axad12 7841:Axad12 7811:Axad12 7764:Axad12 7757:WP:SPA 7750:WP:SPI 7699:Axad12 7648:Axad12 7633:Axad12 7604:Axad12 7552:Axad12 7522:fiveby 6883:Nihaon 6791:(talk) 6524:WP:PST 6456:Their 6433:theirs 6307:WP:PST 6249:WP:PST 6149:WP:PST 6075:WP:NPA 5936:WP:NPA 5731:above. 5687:(talk) 5559:(talk) 5486:(talk) 5410:(talk) 5386:(talk) 5318:(talk) 5271:(talk) 5236:(talk) 5075:While 5058:Axad12 4972:here: 4932:WP:NPA 4920:WP:AGF 4623:WP:NPA 4539:WP:NPA 4374:WP:NPA 4080:ok -- 3919:Oblivy 3869:Oblivy 3375:Meters 3314:Meters 3267:Meters 3263:change 2927:WP:RGW 2758:DatGuy 2586:WP:CIR 2416:WP:CIR 2167:WP:CIR 1943:WP:CIR 1907:CT IPA 1596:Daniel 1591:ARBIPA 1457:, and 1415:, and 1076:search 954:search 832:search 763:search 614:urgent 595:WP:ANI 514:Policy 301:Splits 15907:: --> 15665:WP:PA 15533:Bbb23 15466:Bbb23 15451:Bbb23 15390:WHOIS 15372:(/64) 15348:Bbb23 15333:Bbb23 15267:WHOIS 15249:(/64) 15203:Bbb23 14602:Bbb23 14405:WHOIS 13206::) 12547:WP:LQ 12458:: --> 12445:WHOIS 12417:WHOIS 12389:WHOIS 12361:WHOIS 12333:WHOIS 12305:WHOIS 12277:WHOIS 12249:WHOIS 12216:WHOIS 12188:WHOIS 12056:Bbb23 11922:Nemov 11892:Nemov 11168:some. 11037:never 10813:Nemov 10727:Nemov 10582:Nemov 10541:Nemov 10464:Nemov 10285:Ponyo 10094:fifth 10090:third 10070:such. 9940:WP:42 9871:Ponyo 9754:alien 9587:alien 9523:WP:AN 9447:(per 9124:Kogti 9107:watch 9103:links 6711:WP:OR 6483:WP:OR 6413:. -- 6411:WP:OR 6354:also 6214:More 6157:WP:RS 6067:WP:GF 6042:WP:GF 5890:Ponyo 5741:: --> 5576:three 4869:. -- 4846:post 4764:" at 4587:Zaman 4557:Zaman 4517:Zaman 4498:WP:GF 4484:Zaman 4328:Rasht 4258:Zemen 4244:Zaman 4221:Zemen 4207:Zaman 4167:Zaman 4149:Zaman 4104:Zaman 3973:Zemen 3739:Nemov 2547:tag. 2488:Nemov 2353:Note: 2311:This 2023:edits 2019:made 1975:else. 1481:and @ 706:subst 665:diffs 632:Read 435:Other 346:Files 306:Moves 265:Style 16:< 16185:namm 16182:real 16155:logs 16137:talk 16107:logs 16089:talk 16059:logs 16041:talk 16011:namm 16008:real 16000:this 15986:talk 15967:talk 15925:talk 15908:talk 15888:talk 15882:OK. 15874:talk 15857:talk 15838:talk 15824:talk 15810:talk 15794:talk 15782:here 15767:talk 15610:and 15582:logs 15564:talk 15537:talk 15522:talk 15514:talk 15455:talk 15402:http 15396:RBLs 15360:talk 15337:talk 15279:http 15273:RBLs 15237:talk 15207:talk 15192:talk 15165:8040 15161:8040 15066:and 15049:talk 15024:talk 15001:talk 14982:talk 14956:talk 14941:talk 14905:logs 14881:talk 14847:logs 14823:talk 14789:logs 14765:talk 14731:logs 14707:talk 14673:logs 14649:talk 14622:talk 14606:talk 14582:talk 14568:talk 14553:talk 14535:talk 14502:talk 14423:http 14417:RBLs 14411:RDNS 14381:talk 14355:talk 14333:talk 14295:talk 14261:talk 14239:talk 14225:talk 14210:talk 14189:talk 14170:talk 14144:here 14129:talk 14114:talk 14078:talk 14055:talk 14029:talk 14016:... 14001:talk 13988:... 13872:talk 13762:talk 13745:talk 13714:talk 13699:talk 13670:talk 13615:(ec) 13606:talk 13526:sigh 13436:", " 13422:", " 13292:logs 13268:talk 13184:talk 13174:and 13145:talk 13094:talk 13040:talk 13034:Enby 12995:Chat 12972:Star 12958:talk 12938:Chat 12920:talk 12879:Chat 12856:talk 12798:logs 12780:talk 12773:and 12751:logs 12733:talk 12722:and 12698:talk 12663:talk 12659:Οἶδα 12631:talk 12627:Οἶδα 12616:talk 12598:talk 12580:talk 12576:Οἶδα 12569:and 12555:talk 12551:Οἶδα 12519:logs 12501:talk 12459:talk 12433:talk 12405:talk 12377:talk 12349:talk 12321:talk 12293:talk 12265:talk 12237:talk 12204:talk 12176:talk 12139:Star 12107:TALK 12068:left 12028:talk 12008:talk 11993:talk 11953:talk 11949:John 11926:talk 11911:talk 11907:NebY 11896:talk 11850:talk 11825:talk 11813:and 11743:talk 11733:and 11721:talk 11706:talk 11691:talk 11578:talk 11521:talk 11463:talk 11448:talk 11434:talk 11419:talk 11392:talk 11378:talk 11302:talk 11294:also 11290:both 11269:talk 11236:talk 11195:talk 11145:Rise 11106:talk 11063:talk 11049:talk 11027:talk 11000:talk 10970:Rise 10946:talk 10925:Rise 10884:Rise 10852:talk 10817:talk 10755:talk 10736:talk 10713:talk 10665:talk 10644:talk 10626:talk 10590:talk 10567:talk 10557:No, 10549:talk 10531:talk 10509:talk 10492:talk 10468:talk 10360:logs 10342:talk 10320:talk 10236:talk 10195:talk 10173:talk 10143:has 10106:talk 10092:and 10045:talk 10029:(my 9973:talk 9949:talk 9887:talk 9851:talk 9837:talk 9823:talk 9797:talk 9760:talk 9751:ugly 9721:talk 9717:Elli 9691:talk 9635:and 9619:The 9611:talk 9593:talk 9584:ugly 9493:Star 9479:talk 9462:talk 9420:here 9364:talk 9329:talk 9308:talk 9286:talk 9256:talk 9242:talk 9223:talk 9148:Talk 9128:talk 9111:logs 9095:talk 9091:edit 9056:logs 9038:talk 9016:talk 8973:talk 8936:talk 8921:talk 8903:talk 8899:Whpq 8889:talk 8874:talk 8855:talk 8844:See 8816:Star 8796:talk 8781:talk 8729:logs 8711:talk 8679:talk 8642:talk 8591:Star 8567:talk 8545:talk 8527:talk 8517:and 8494:Star 8477:talk 8462:talk 8437:talk 8416:talk 8394:talk 8355:talk 8323:Star 8308:talk 8287:talk 8268:Star 8261:has 8257:Izno 8241:talk 8213:talk 8185:talk 8171:talk 8149:talk 8131:talk 8117:talk 8100:talk 8086:talk 8071:talk 7999:talk 7976:talk 7962:talk 7944:talk 7930:talk 7913:talk 7894:talk 7879:talk 7860:talk 7845:talk 7830:talk 7815:talk 7797:talk 7783:talk 7768:talk 7733:talk 7718:talk 7703:talk 7667:talk 7652:talk 7637:talk 7622:talk 7608:talk 7556:talk 7546:22). 7526:zero 7509:for 7500:talk 7487:and 6906:logs 6888:talk 6858:logs 6840:talk 6806:talk 6767:talk 6734:talk 6719:talk 6677:talk 6655:talk 6639:talk 6558:talk 6540:talk 6526:and 6510:talk 6491:talk 6469:talk 6429:note 6419:talk 6370:talk 6324:talk 6297:talk 6283:talk 6269:talk 6239:talk 6224:talk 6206:talk 6172:talk 6159:and 6138:talk 6132:not. 6104:talk 6073:and 5999:logs 5981:talk 5955:talk 5917:talk 5874:talk 5859:talk 5840:talk 5825:talk 5790:Star 5767:talk 5710:talk 5706:NebY 5668:talk 5625:talk 5611:talk 5607:NebY 5582:AFCs 5539:talk 5535:NebY 5508:talk 5504:NebY 5467:talk 5453:talk 5439:talk 5435:NebY 5425:talk 5363:talk 5349:talk 5345:NebY 5341:this 5337:this 5252:talk 5200:logs 5182:talk 5158:talk 5122:talk 5062:talk 5029:talk 4995:talk 4959:talk 4944:talk 4865:See 4856:talk 4797:talk 4776:talk 4747:talk 4591:talk 4561:talk 4547:talk 4537:and 4521:talk 4506:talk 4488:talk 4466:talk 4441:talk 4423:talk 4415:both 4404:talk 4382:talk 4360:talk 4352:more 4336:talk 4314:talk 4296:talk 4270:talk 4248:talk 4233:talk 4211:talk 4171:talk 4153:talk 4138:talk 4108:talk 4086:talk 3996:logs 3978:talk 3923:talk 3873:talk 3799:talk 3776:talk 3761:talk 3743:talk 3714:talk 3674:talk 3656:talk 3587:tålk 3567:talk 3469:talk 3412:talk 3394:talk 3379:talk 3326:talk 3271:talk 3210:talk 3169:talk 3153:user 3127:2024 3090:talk 3067:talk 3049:talk 3013:talk 2980:talk 2976:NebY 2952:talk 2935:talk 2931:NebY 2904:was 2868:talk 2854:talk 2840:talk 2807:talk 2627:and 2492:talk 2475:talk 2447:talk 2425:talk 2396:this 2335:talk 2303:talk 2282:talk 2229:talk 2213:talk 2195:talk 2179:talk 2150:talk 2134:talk 2122:this 2120:and 2118:This 2106:talk 2088:talk 2071:talk 1984:talk 1950:Nate 1919:talk 1801:talk 1786:talk 1764:talk 1750:talk 1739:here 1682:and 1645:logs 1627:talk 1600:talk 1581:talk 1554:talk 1536:talk 1522:talk 1507:talk 1491:talk 1477:Hi @ 1469:talk 1460:this 1454:this 1448:this 1442:this 1436:this 1430:this 1424:this 1418:this 1412:this 1406:this 1379:logs 1361:talk 1315:Talk 1060:1167 1055:1166 1050:1165 1045:1164 1040:1163 1035:1162 1030:1161 1025:1160 1020:1159 1015:1158 1008:1157 1003:1156 998:1155 993:1154 988:1153 983:1152 978:1151 973:1150 968:1149 963:1148 727:use 688:must 644:Try 248:Spam 117:Bots 105:Main 15955:3RR 15474:‎‎‎ 15426:‎‎‎ 15307:‎‎‎ 15092:🗯️ 14970:APK 14600:.-- 14357:) 14297:) 14084:- 13740:Rjj 13483:PSA 13444:" ( 13440:all 13432:: " 13415:". 13384:" ( 13380:: " 13370:" ( 13366:: " 13356:" ( 13352:: " 13209:Sir 13186:) ( 13176:Liz 13158:Liz 12998:) ( 12941:) ( 12899:Sir 12882:) ( 12826:Sir 12049:to 11411:one 11402:did 11333:DID 10831:As 10693:you 10655:Liz 10015:RfA 9748:big 9745:The 9581:big 9578:The 9300:Liz 8891:) 8857:) 8658:Eng 8621:ABG 8386:Liz 6028:... 5907:Liz 5399:). 5339:or 4891:» ° 4871:LCU 4682:ok 4555:Ok 3666:RFC 3251:Eng 2128:. 2037:to 1845:to 1463:). 1300:340 1295:339 1290:338 1285:337 1280:336 1275:335 1270:334 1265:333 1260:332 1255:331 1248:330 1243:329 1238:328 1233:327 1228:326 1223:325 1218:324 1213:323 1208:322 1203:321 1182:487 1177:486 1172:485 1167:484 1162:483 1157:482 1152:481 1147:480 1142:479 1137:478 1130:477 1125:476 1120:475 1115:474 1110:473 1105:472 1100:471 1095:470 1090:469 1085:468 938:365 933:364 928:363 923:362 918:361 913:360 908:359 903:358 898:357 893:356 886:355 881:354 876:353 871:352 866:351 861:350 856:349 851:348 846:347 841:346 694:is 534:WMF 321:XfD 157:VRT 16213:: 16194:· 16179:My 16020:· 16005:My 15988:) 15969:) 15945:, 15941:, 15890:) 15876:) 15859:) 15840:) 15826:) 15812:) 15796:) 15769:) 15539:) 15524:) 15489:✏️ 15487:• 15485:💬 15457:) 15441:✏️ 15439:• 15437:💬 15339:) 15322:✏️ 15320:• 15318:💬 15209:) 15194:) 15167:. 15082:jp 15051:) 15026:) 15003:) 14995:. 14985:) 14958:) 14943:) 14935:. 14624:) 14608:) 14584:) 14570:) 14555:) 14537:) 14529:. 14514:. 14504:) 14478:iz 14457:💬 14347:, 14335:) 14316:iz 14308:. 14287:, 14277:, 14241:) 14227:) 14212:) 14191:) 14172:) 14147:. 14131:) 14116:) 14088:) 14080:- 14068:A 14057:• 14026:* 14022:* 13998:* 13994:* 13953:, 13949:, 13945:, 13941:, 13921:, 13874:) 13847:MM 13764:) 13747:) 13716:) 13701:) 13672:) 13622:MM 13608:) 13489:". 13448:). 13426:". 13388:). 13374:). 13360:). 13346:". 13232:iz 13192:) 13147:) 13125:MM 13115:iz 13096:) 13060:iz 13046:) 13042:· 13017:iz 12960:) 12922:) 12858:) 12700:) 12665:) 12648:iz 12633:) 12618:) 12600:) 12582:) 12557:) 12478:iz 12453:-- 12122:MM 12113:) 12093:. 12030:) 12022:. 11995:) 11987:. 11970:iz 11955:) 11928:) 11913:) 11898:) 11877:iz 11852:) 11827:) 11745:) 11723:) 11708:) 11693:) 11655:‥ 11613:‥ 11580:) 11544:‥ 11523:) 11465:) 11450:) 11436:) 11421:) 11394:) 11380:) 11304:) 11271:) 11238:) 11197:) 11108:) 11081:‥ 11065:) 11051:) 11029:) 11002:) 10948:) 10909:. 10854:) 10819:) 10775:MM 10769:, 10757:) 10738:) 10715:) 10667:) 10646:) 10628:) 10609:iz 10592:) 10569:) 10551:) 10533:) 10511:) 10494:) 10470:) 10458:. 10322:) 10306:iz 10175:) 10131:iz 10123:. 10108:) 10088:, 10047:) 9951:) 9889:) 9853:) 9839:) 9825:) 9799:) 9763:) 9727:) 9723:| 9713:pl 9693:) 9685:. 9613:) 9596:) 9556:, 9537:iz 9481:) 9464:) 9366:) 9258:) 9244:) 9225:) 9173:. 9150:) 9134:) 9130:• 9109:| 9105:| 9101:| 9097:| 9093:| 9018:) 8990:. 8975:) 8938:) 8918:| 8905:) 8871:| 8849:. 8798:) 8783:) 8775:. 8769:, 8763:, 8757:, 8681:) 8644:) 8628:) 8569:) 8547:) 8529:) 8479:) 8464:) 8439:) 8418:) 8396:) 8376:iz 8357:) 8310:) 8289:) 8243:) 8215:) 8187:) 8173:) 8151:) 8143:. 8133:) 8119:) 8102:) 8088:) 8073:) 8001:) 7978:) 7964:) 7946:) 7932:) 7915:) 7896:) 7881:) 7862:) 7847:) 7832:) 7817:) 7799:) 7785:) 7770:) 7735:) 7720:) 7705:) 7669:) 7654:) 7639:) 7624:) 7610:) 7558:) 7528:) 7502:) 7437:. 6808:) 6769:) 6736:) 6721:) 6679:) 6641:) 6560:) 6542:) 6534:. 6522:, 6512:) 6493:) 6471:) 6460:: 6421:) 6372:) 6326:) 6299:) 6285:) 6271:) 6241:) 6226:) 6218:. 6208:) 6174:) 6166:. 6140:) 6128:." 6106:) 6069:, 5957:) 5919:) 5909:: 5876:) 5861:) 5842:) 5827:) 5819:. 5769:) 5744:MM 5721:: 5712:) 5627:) 5613:) 5590:MM 5571:)( 5541:) 5524:}} 5518:{{ 5510:) 5469:) 5455:) 5441:) 5427:) 5365:) 5351:) 5290:MM 5254:) 5160:) 5124:) 5064:) 5031:) 4997:) 4961:) 4946:) 4893:∆t 4858:) 4812:. 4799:) 4791:. 4778:) 4749:) 4690:: 4593:) 4563:) 4549:) 4533:, 4523:) 4508:) 4490:) 4468:) 4443:) 4425:) 4406:) 4384:) 4362:) 4338:) 4316:) 4298:) 4272:) 4250:) 4235:) 4213:) 4173:) 4155:) 4140:) 4110:) 4088:) 4023:. 3941:‥ 3925:) 3892:‥ 3875:) 3840:‥ 3818:iz 3801:) 3778:) 3763:) 3745:) 3716:) 3693:‥ 3676:) 3658:) 3635:‥ 3606:‥ 3592:. 3585:| 3569:) 3487:‥ 3471:) 3430:‥ 3414:) 3396:) 3381:) 3373:. 3345:‥ 3328:) 3297:‥ 3287:. 3273:) 3228:‥ 3212:) 3189:‥ 3171:) 3115:. 3092:) 3069:) 3051:) 3035:𝔓 3030:𝔓 3015:) 2982:) 2974:. 2937:) 2929:. 2870:) 2856:) 2842:) 2809:) 2779:Ca 2736:𝔓 2731:𝔓 2695:𝔓 2690:𝔓 2631:. 2535:I 2494:) 2477:) 2469:. 2427:) 2372:) 2370:📝 2368:• 2366:💬 2364:( 2337:) 2313:is 2305:) 2284:) 2268:iz 2231:) 2197:) 2152:) 2136:) 2124:. 2090:) 1986:) 1909:. 1892::" 1803:) 1788:) 1766:) 1752:) 1602:) 1556:) 1538:) 1524:) 1509:) 1493:) 1471:) 1451:, 1445:, 1439:, 1433:, 1427:, 1409:, 1074:, 952:, 830:, 761:, 704:{{ 629:: 16199:) 16189:( 16175:) 16170:· 16164:· 16158:· 16152:· 16146:· 16140:· 16135:( 16127:) 16122:· 16116:· 16110:· 16104:· 16098:· 16092:· 16087:( 16079:) 16074:· 16068:· 16062:· 16056:· 16050:· 16044:· 16039:( 16025:) 16015:( 15984:( 15965:( 15928:· 15923:( 15886:( 15872:( 15855:( 15836:( 15822:( 15808:( 15792:( 15765:( 15643:@ 15602:) 15597:· 15591:· 15585:· 15579:· 15573:· 15567:· 15562:( 15535:( 15520:( 15512:( 15480:h 15476:h 15468:: 15464:@ 15453:( 15432:h 15428:h 15416:) 15411:· 15405:· 15399:· 15393:· 15387:· 15381:· 15375:· 15369:· 15363:· 15358:( 15350:: 15346:@ 15335:( 15313:h 15309:h 15293:) 15288:· 15282:· 15276:· 15270:· 15264:· 15258:· 15252:· 15246:· 15240:· 15235:( 15205:( 15190:( 15088:g 15085:× 15047:( 15037:: 15033:@ 15022:( 14999:( 14979:( 14954:( 14939:( 14925:) 14920:· 14914:· 14908:· 14902:· 14896:· 14890:· 14884:· 14879:( 14867:) 14862:· 14856:· 14850:· 14844:· 14838:· 14832:· 14826:· 14821:( 14809:) 14804:· 14798:· 14792:· 14786:· 14780:· 14774:· 14768:· 14763:( 14751:) 14746:· 14740:· 14734:· 14728:· 14722:· 14716:· 14710:· 14705:( 14693:) 14688:· 14682:· 14676:· 14670:· 14664:· 14658:· 14652:· 14647:( 14620:( 14604:( 14580:( 14566:( 14551:( 14533:( 14500:( 14475:L 14451:A 14448:F 14445:C 14437:) 14432:· 14426:· 14420:· 14414:· 14408:· 14402:· 14396:· 14390:· 14384:· 14379:( 14353:( 14331:( 14313:L 14293:( 14264:· 14259:( 14237:( 14223:( 14208:( 14187:( 14168:( 14127:( 14112:( 14076:( 14061:) 14053:( 14049:0 13880:@ 13870:( 13786:@ 13760:( 13743:( 13727:: 13723:@ 13712:( 13697:( 13668:( 13604:( 13588:@ 13552:@ 13530:) 13522:( 13512:— 13464:" 13401:. 13312:) 13307:· 13301:· 13295:· 13289:· 13283:· 13277:· 13271:· 13266:( 13229:L 13182:( 13160:: 13156:@ 13143:( 13112:L 13092:( 13057:L 13038:( 13014:L 13002:) 12992:( 12956:( 12945:) 12935:( 12918:( 12886:) 12876:( 12854:( 12818:) 12813:· 12807:· 12801:· 12795:· 12789:· 12783:· 12778:( 12771:) 12766:· 12760:· 12754:· 12748:· 12742:· 12736:· 12731:( 12696:( 12661:( 12645:L 12629:( 12614:( 12596:( 12578:( 12553:( 12539:) 12534:· 12528:· 12522:· 12516:· 12510:· 12504:· 12499:( 12475:L 12447:) 12442:· 12436:· 12431:( 12419:) 12414:· 12408:· 12403:( 12391:) 12386:· 12380:· 12375:( 12363:) 12358:· 12352:· 12347:( 12335:) 12330:· 12324:· 12319:( 12307:) 12302:· 12296:· 12291:( 12279:) 12274:· 12268:· 12263:( 12251:) 12246:· 12240:· 12235:( 12218:) 12213:· 12207:· 12202:( 12190:) 12185:· 12179:· 12174:( 12101:( 12026:( 12011:· 12006:( 11991:( 11967:L 11951:( 11924:( 11909:( 11894:( 11874:L 11848:( 11823:( 11757:: 11753:@ 11741:( 11719:( 11704:( 11689:( 11660:论 11618:论 11576:( 11549:论 11519:( 11461:( 11446:( 11432:( 11417:( 11390:( 11376:( 11317:: 11313:@ 11300:( 11267:( 11249:: 11245:@ 11234:( 11220:. 11193:( 11142:w 11139:o 11136:n 11133:S 11104:( 11086:论 11061:( 11047:( 11025:( 10998:( 10967:w 10964:o 10961:n 10958:S 10944:( 10922:w 10919:o 10916:n 10913:S 10881:w 10878:o 10875:n 10872:S 10850:( 10815:( 10804:: 10753:( 10734:( 10711:( 10663:( 10657:: 10653:@ 10642:( 10624:( 10606:L 10588:( 10565:( 10547:( 10529:( 10507:( 10490:( 10466:( 10380:) 10375:· 10369:· 10363:· 10357:· 10351:· 10345:· 10340:( 10318:( 10303:L 10268:) 10263:· 10257:· 10251:· 10245:· 10239:· 10234:( 10227:) 10222:· 10216:· 10210:· 10204:· 10198:· 10193:( 10171:( 10128:L 10104:( 10043:( 10019:. 10017:) 10012:· 10006:· 10000:· 9994:· 9988:· 9982:· 9976:· 9971:( 9947:( 9885:( 9864:: 9860:@ 9849:( 9835:( 9821:( 9795:( 9757:( 9719:( 9711:( 9689:( 9625:: 9621:@ 9609:( 9590:( 9534:L 9477:( 9460:( 9362:( 9332:· 9327:( 9311:· 9306:( 9289:· 9284:( 9254:( 9240:( 9221:( 9126:( 9113:) 9089:( 9076:) 9071:· 9065:· 9059:· 9053:· 9047:· 9041:· 9036:( 9014:( 8982:@ 8971:( 8934:( 8901:( 8887:( 8853:( 8794:( 8779:( 8772:4 8766:3 8760:2 8754:1 8749:) 8744:· 8738:· 8732:· 8726:· 8720:· 8714:· 8709:( 8677:( 8671:: 8667:@ 8653:E 8640:( 8624:( 8565:( 8543:( 8525:( 8509:@ 8475:( 8460:( 8435:( 8414:( 8392:( 8384:@ 8373:L 8353:( 8306:( 8285:( 8259:: 8255:@ 8239:( 8211:( 8183:( 8169:( 8147:( 8129:( 8115:( 8098:( 8084:( 8069:( 7997:( 7984:@ 7974:( 7960:( 7942:( 7928:( 7911:( 7892:( 7877:( 7858:( 7843:( 7828:( 7813:( 7795:( 7781:( 7766:( 7731:( 7716:( 7701:( 7665:( 7650:( 7635:( 7620:( 7606:( 7584:. 7554:( 7524:( 7498:( 6994:] 6926:) 6921:· 6915:· 6909:· 6903:· 6897:· 6891:· 6886:( 6878:) 6873:· 6867:· 6861:· 6855:· 6849:· 6843:· 6838:( 6804:( 6765:( 6732:( 6717:( 6675:( 6637:( 6556:( 6538:( 6508:( 6489:( 6477:@ 6467:( 6435:. 6417:( 6405:@ 6378:" 6368:( 6322:( 6309:/ 6295:( 6281:( 6267:( 6251:/ 6237:( 6222:( 6204:( 6170:( 6136:( 6118:. 6102:( 6019:) 6014:· 6008:· 6002:· 5996:· 5990:· 5984:· 5979:( 5953:( 5938:/ 5915:( 5872:( 5857:( 5838:( 5823:( 5765:( 5708:( 5671:· 5666:( 5623:( 5609:( 5537:( 5506:( 5465:( 5451:( 5437:( 5423:( 5361:( 5347:( 5250:( 5220:) 5215:· 5209:· 5203:· 5197:· 5191:· 5185:· 5180:( 5156:( 5137:: 5120:( 5112:@ 5105:: 5060:( 5027:( 5011:: 4993:( 4982:: 4978:@ 4957:( 4942:( 4908:) 4904:( 4895:° 4889:@ 4887:« 4879:D 4875:A 4854:( 4838:: 4818:W 4795:( 4774:( 4745:( 4621:/ 4589:( 4581:@ 4559:( 4545:( 4519:( 4504:( 4486:( 4474:@ 4464:( 4439:( 4421:( 4402:( 4395:: 4391:@ 4380:( 4372:/ 4358:( 4334:( 4312:( 4294:( 4268:( 4256:@ 4246:( 4231:( 4219:@ 4209:( 4201:@ 4169:( 4151:( 4136:( 4106:( 4084:( 4016:) 4011:· 4005:· 3999:· 3993:· 3987:· 3981:· 3976:( 3946:论 3921:( 3897:论 3871:( 3845:论 3815:L 3797:( 3774:( 3759:( 3741:( 3712:( 3698:论 3672:( 3654:( 3640:论 3611:论 3565:( 3492:论 3467:( 3435:论 3410:( 3392:( 3377:( 3350:论 3324:( 3312:@ 3302:论 3269:( 3246:E 3233:论 3208:( 3194:论 3167:( 3129:. 3088:( 3065:( 3047:( 3011:( 2997:@ 2978:( 2933:( 2866:( 2852:( 2838:( 2805:( 2750:: 2746:@ 2528:: 2510:: 2490:( 2473:( 2449:) 2445:( 2423:( 2333:( 2322:: 2301:( 2280:( 2265:L 2227:( 2215:) 2211:( 2193:( 2181:) 2177:( 2162:" 2148:( 2132:( 2108:) 2104:( 2086:( 2073:) 2069:( 2048:. 1997:: 1993:@ 1982:( 1965:) 1959:( 1955:• 1921:) 1917:( 1887:: 1883:@ 1799:( 1784:( 1762:( 1748:( 1734:. 1665:) 1660:· 1654:· 1648:· 1642:· 1636:· 1630:· 1625:( 1598:( 1584:· 1579:( 1552:( 1534:( 1520:( 1505:( 1489:( 1467:( 1399:) 1394:· 1388:· 1382:· 1376:· 1370:· 1364:· 1359:( 1196:) 1192:( 1078:) 1070:( 956:) 948:( 834:) 826:( 765:) 757:( 732:. 708:: 699:. 678:. 422:) 418:( 89:. 61:e 54:t 47:v 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Knowledge

Index