1091:
1065:
1104:
1078:
2201:) and yet, as per their edit summaries in their mass reversions of my portal work, the user also in part disapproved of the utilization of transclusion templates that provide verbatim, up-to-date content in portals relative to that in articles. This philosophy leaves portal editors with no way or recourse to improve or expand portals: BHG considers either method to be improper, essentially blocking any improvements from occurring. Meantime, I initiated an RfC to obtain community input regarding formalizing the use of transclusion templates, which has received overwhelming support:
3335:– with excellent result: through BHG's patience and diligent approach the crux of the conflict got defused. She continued to extend her hospitality where other editors might have given hints someone was outstaying their welcome. The discussion took over two months, with only sparse, but very much ad rem, comments by BHG, who thus was very helpful in resolving the conflict (in surplus of "harbouring" the safe place for two other editors to discuss & come to terms). Through that interaction I came to understand BHG has a very sound and thorough understanding of "
4428:-style "rescue" efforts to remedy technical problems whilst )in NA1K's case) demonstrated sustained incompetence at the core editorial task in portals of selecting content and collaborating with editors who have some expertise and experience in the topic to review and assess the work down. Instead, NA1K and their vocal enablers repeat their uncritical mantra of "improvement", object vociferously to analysis of that improvement (e.g. NA1K's denunciation of my analysis of NA!K's efforts wrt Australia:
1025:" As North America well knows, I don't "attack" editors with whom I have honest disagreements.", " NA1K's sustained pattern of strategic mendacity, and per WP:SPADE I call it out for what it is.", " liar NA1K resorts once again to blatant lying", "Now NA1K responds to my compliant with another demonstrable lie. It takes an extraordinary level of mendacity to double down on a lie like that. The only WP:BAITING here is NA1K's persistent and sustained lying about guidelines and about other editors."
43:
1228:. In response, The Transhumanist started a revival project, first introducing new tools that made maintenance easier (many users helped with the technical side of this), later mass-creating portals on all kinds of topics. TTH also replaced manual portals by fully automated ones, annoying me and other old-style maintainers quite a bit. Many others were annoyed by the mass creation, which also changed portals from being a "mini main page" to being a navigational aid, similar to
998:"NA1K's web of lies, deceptions, distortions, misrepresentations, subversions and strategic omissions is a despicable way for any human to behave in any context. NA1K's despicable conduct here will not earn them fame or cash, which are the common motivations elsewhere for such abysmal conduct. But even in this anonymous cash-free space of Knowledge editing, the ethics revealed by this liar-admin NA1K is the ethical framework of the fraudster or confidence trickster."
1661:), the OP and I both provided many links demonstrating BHG's ongoing problems with personal attacks. In the discussion, BHG agreed to stop attacking, but later reneged on this. For months, BHG has smeared others as being dishonest, deceitful, etc., resorting to name calling such as calling users “a liar” etc. when BHG disagrees with their opinions. The user also has a habit of misrepresenting the views of others during discussions and in later discussions.
187:
3469:, all of which were direct at Ɱ. Most of the other participants in the discussion, aside from Newshunter12, were able to participate in the discussion without lashing out at Ɱ. Regardless of whether Ɱ was guilty of making false statements, BHG's outburst was unacceptable and inflammatory. She has shown time and again that she is not willing to respect our civility policies. Her conduct is unbecoming of any editor, admin or otherwise.
2697:
person measures this basic utility, to judge if editor-time overhead is worth it, in page views, which are typically 100-1000 times lower for portals then their head articles. What mattered most to Certes was that the portal looked good, not that the portal would take nearly five years to get the total number of views the head article gets in a single day, and Kusma displayed the same completely aesthetic keep criteria
4469:
competence. If
Knowledge is to be a place where NA1K's combination of sustained incompetence, verbose bluster and aversion to critical debate us to be a protected characteristic, then we will have lost something very precious from our goal to build an actual encyclopedia rather than just a playground for people who like making pretty lists by robotic methods and feel hurt by the application of critical thinking. --
3411:"low-quality" edits, largely by NA1k which relate to their use of the "black box" portal which makes portals significantly easier to maintain, have since been backed by consensus, and some of the small problems which arose from those edits were quickly and easily fixed by the template creator (see the Portal talk:Australia discussion above.) This is not a competence issue - it's a disagreement over content.
4001:
3977:
2256:. The lead of POG is ambiguous, and BHG makes continual assumptions that their personal interpretation is correct, stating repeatedly that those who disagree with them are dishonest, or lying. Part of the reason POG was demoted is because 1) it did not have any formal consensus to be a guideline, and 2) it was not intended to be a guideline page. For more information, see
2083:) for details. In doing so, the user places themself in an unjust position of absolute ownership over these portals, essentially holding them hostage by obstructing any improvements from occurring. In instances when others have undone BHG's reversions, BHG has at times quickly reverted to their preferred version, such as occurred with Portal:Australia (
4420:) is accompanied by huge skill at using diffs to repeatedly misrepresent my actions and views. I have not found any instance anywhere of NA1K acknowledging what a poor job they did in those case, or how their failings went undetected for so long because of their failure to notify other editors or to transparently disclose what they had done.
4108:. The main point here is that this portal was deleted as being unmaintained but it appears that it was being maintained regularly and that the main maintainer only discovered the deletion when he turned up to find that the portal and all its pages had vanished. The maintainer had not been notified and so is naturally upset by this result.
3601:"I find the accusations of editors being "knowingly false" when you simply disagree with what they say, the use of the sarcastic soubriquet "portalista" to discount any views contrary to your own, and the characterisation of anyone who disagrees with you as indulging in "group think" not only unpleasant but also very counterproductive."
1257:
portal by checking whether it is maintained and has lots of readers" and (B) "Portals should be about broad topics, because that makes it more likely to find maintainers and readers". The interpretation (A) brought us such gems as
Newshunter12's claim "Culture is not a broad enough topic to attract readers and maintainers."
741:
anyone who doesn't share her take of a situation appears dishonest or incompetent. Coming from such an authoritative admin, the many thousands of words she's posted against pro portal editors may have caused some to think there is equal fault on both sides. So posting a few examples to suggest this is not the case.
4431:... and are evidently sincerely outraged that anyone would dare be so appallingly rude as to apply the sort of critical analysis which should be central to the intellectual task of building an enyclopedia. So they respond by complaining of personal attacks, and complain that the critiques are "impeding progress".
2628:. How can any reasonable editor have the time (let alone the required high level understanding of portal space) to sift through that to study what changes were made or try to discern if this creates a balanced topic list? It's an example of NA1K's "black-box" portal plan as described by BHG in detail here
2114:) were against BHG's unilateral reversion spree and for the reversions to be undone, but the entire discussion was abruptly closed. At that discussion, I also denoted how BHG literally broke many portals when reverting, apparently not even bothering to check them after their series of one-click reverts:
2696:
stated that page views (or lack thereof), a core reason for deleting most of the 1000 abandoned pre-TTH spam portals over the last 7 months, were not a reason to consider deleting a portal. Portals do not have their own content and are useful only for their utility as navigational devices. A rational
1256:
and what its famous statement "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" means. The main interpretations were (A) "Portals should be about broad topics, and we can find out whether a topic is broad enough for a
1171:
I don't have evidence that is specifically about the case dispute, but I have some background information. I am posting this because some other editors are commenting about BrownHairedGirl's administrative rights, and I believe that this is potentially useful background related to her temperament and
3539:
A group of editors soon decided to "revitalize" WikiProject
Portals. The results were ultimately disastrous. They developed a tool to fully automate portals, turning them into glorified navboxes with no human input as to the choice and quality of the articles and images. They then started converting
3498:
for a long time. What is needed is a fresh start for Brown as they are great at category stuff and other behind the scenes essential edits. I acknowledge my wording may have been harsh at times but I have moved on.. and amended my slight in behavior.... this is something Brown needs to do. I hoping
3347:
in such circumstances, and indeed, as is explained in the WP:SPADE essay, those who take offence often do so "not to protect themselves from personal attacks, but to protect their edits from review". Through all the mis- and out-of-context quoting of what BHG said in discussions, when I've read some
1211:
Tracking and describing the entire dispute is beyond both my abilities and my current free time. Here are just a few selections from the dispute that touch on my personal experience. The committee should definitely review the ANI reports in the case request, which contain a lot of evidence, and also
1188:. Re-blocks an editor for making a bad unblock request during a previous block, quickly after the previous block had run its course, without giving the editor an opportunity to respond to the decline of the unblock request. Block is widely criticized by other editors, and is only begrudgingly lifted.
3342:
I've little to add about
Portalspace specifics, which for me is somewhat of a playground in another galaxy compared to what I normally do in Knowledge, but I'm sure, as in, not a shred of doubt, that BHG does excellently in that universe, and is indeed the kind of editor we need for Portalspace, if
788:
in question actually contain zero evidence, merely over-passionate arguments. NA1K had been arguing to the effect that while WP:POG can no longer claim to be a formal guideline, it still has an advisory function (like an essay). Admittedly NA1K didn't word it that clearly, yet it was rather bizarre
740:
Like BD2412 I feel it would greatly hurt the project to lose BHG as an editor or admin. She's made over 1.5 million edits, is fiercely intelligent, cultured, and is sometimes helpful and kind. Yet she does seem to get over passionate on some topics. Possibly leading to a tunnel vision effect, where
4442:
That is why I have been slow to write evidence, and have not engaged in detailed diff-farming. When faced with such widespread antics such as NA1K's bluster, or Moxy's repetition of counter-factual follies at multiple venues, or
AmericanAir88's readiness to testify the demonstrably false assertion
4044:
The 1st sentence is clearly untrue (unless perhaps the meaning of the word "call" is twisted). The 2nd sentence is incorrect (and Mj probably knew it was incorrect) - and misleading (e.g. even if those editors who were doing gnome work had watchlisted the main portal page they probably wouldn't be
3096:
I should also resolve a misunderstanding. I have occasionally opined that a portal "looks good". I mean that its scope, mechanics and accuracy seem adequate. Those words have been misinterpreted to imply that I enjoy the visual appearance and consider other aspects unimportant. That was not my
2863:
Featured portal candidates often underwent a peer-review process (formally or informally) where major concerns with content were ironed out prior to the formal featured review. Several featured portal reviewers considered utility as an introduction to the area, originality, topic balance including
2074:
BHG obstructs portals from being maintained, expanded or improved. On 12 October 2019, BHG performed mass reversions of many portals I had been working on, many over the course of months, in a rapid, drive-by, knee-jerk, fashion using a copy/paste rationale, all in one day. See the table, listings
637:
4. Not a role model for non-admins. Administrators are meant to be examples of
Wikipedias who excel in the pilars and understand all policies. They are meant to cooperate and help build an encyclopedia. BHG being able to commit activities I mention above is not what an Admin stands for or what ANY
4438:
After 14 years editing
Knowledge, I find it very hard to persuade myself that it there is any point in continuing to volunteer my time to a project which indulges the sort of low-competence/high-bluster antics displayed by NA1K and some other editors who have given evidence here. When faced with
4434:
I joined
Knowledge to build an encyclopedia, and I expect to work with editors who act in good faith, are willing to acknowledge errors, and who welcome critical debate. For 13 years, in wide range range of forums and topics, I have found just that. But in portals discussions I have confronted a
3410:
There are also some anti-portal arguments which have stuck, namely that they're "fun," "fun to create" and "technically neat:" I simply find portals to be a good navigational tool which also highlights featured content. They're not "fun" at all, they're rather difficult to put together. Also, the
930:
specifically states that massive content changes that are difficult to revert and justified by already being carried out is unacceptable. The thing is, NA1k clearly implemented his "black box" format without formally obtaining consensus. Regardless of whether it was "sneaky" or not, BHG dissented
3587:
Both sides have become entrenched leading to sometimes heated exchanges and talking past each other, but I have failed to see any evidence of statements by
Northamerica1000, Moxy, Certes, or Kusma in the various debates which are remotely equivalent to BrownHairedGirl's persistent denigration of
4407:
The problem here is and remains that portals have become the playground of editors who do not demonstrate effective skills either in building portals or or analysing the, and who resent critical debate. The most extreme example by far is NA1K, whose repeated inability to acknowledge the abysmal
2766:. I later apologized to her over the hacking misunderstanding, and we have closely collaborated since early August at hundreds of portal MfD's. We have also closely collaborated to clean up the empty categories, long un-carried-out delete decisions, and other debris left behind by portal MfD's:
688:
I have no intention of digging around for further evidence. Others might feel compelled to do so. I do not believe that it benefits the project as a whole to lose BrownHairedGirl either as an editor or as an administrator, but some measure may be required to bar further activity in the vein of
4468:
would be inoperable if that was the case. I have now have little faith in the ability of
Knowledge's processes to sustain the principle that we are here to build an encyclopedia, that this requires competence including the ability to acknowledge error and to recognise the limits of one's own
3488:
As seen demonstrated many times on-this page we have an admin that does not have the objectivity to debate anyone in a reasonable manner when it comes to portals. Lack of civility even if they may be right on some points should not be tolerated - especially by an admin representing the admin
3278:
for more than a decade. I agree that the history is correct. This guideline had never actually been approved by the community, but was widely used as if it had been approved by the community. In the middle of 2019, some editors began noting that it had never been ratified. I submitted a
968:
I want to apologize for shortening the quotes, but there is a word limit. Please check all quotes for correctness and look at the corresponding context to get the whole picture. These quotes are from 5 different discussion pages related to portals in 2019 alone. This list is not meant to be
744:
1015:"Note that the comment above by Knowledgekid87 is a blatant lie: i.e. it is a statement which is demonstrably untrue, was known by Knowledgekid87 to be untrue, and made with the intent of deception." (Note: please also note the editing summary: "→Portal:Golf: note another portalista lie")
684:, which are worth examining. I do believe that she has toned down her invective following these discussions, but still evinces a tendency to view such disagreements through an ill-fitting moral lens in which those who think differently are harshly characterized as dishonest or incompetent.
833:
4517:
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
2215:
BHG asks the same questions on multiple discussion pages, and when a user doesn't respond at each one of them, they then say they're being ignored. This has occurred even when BHG is aware that a response has been provided. For example, the user questioned my citing of page views
2232:. Users should not have to follow another user around everywhere to see if they are being continuously maligned. BHG has used this tactic deliberately to smear my reputation, and doesn't seem interested in my actual responses. Another direct example of this problem exists at ANI
2123:
This is all very concerning, because BHG is one of the top nominators of portals for deletion, and in the process of reverting any and all improvements to portals, the user acted to gratify their preference for the deletion of most portals, which the user has previously stated:
1601:
3082:: a civil, reasoned opinion that an otherwise good page should not be deleted simply for lack of incoming links; hardly the sort of conduct for which we drag editors to ArbCom. I deny the accusation that I treat portals as a playground, for which no evidence was presented.
3306:
803:
3588:
editors with whom she disagrees. Her describing them as liars, idiots, unintelligent, and incompetent is amply demonstrated in the diffs by other editors here. It completely crosses the line and makes any kind of reasoned discussion about portals or compromise impossible.
3371:
1046:
983:" the exceptionally poor writing skills which Moxy has displayed in all the discussions I have seen, it is probably a blessing that Moxy puts their efforts into defending the indefensible chunks of portalspace rather than polluting articlespace with gobbledygook such as "
1643:
BHG has engaged in personal attacks to such an extreme level that I turned off receiving pings from them in my preferences some while back. All too often, their pings led to a barrage of attacks against me and others. Other users have also asked BHG to stop pinging them:
4175:
When the deletion of the automated spam portals was complete, the editors who had learnt how scrutinise the complex portals then moved on the many other abysmal portals, and brought them to MFD. This brought organised resistance from the dwindling crew of portals fans.
4261:
NA1K's complaints are all about their sustained misconduct being directly challenged, rather than about the substance of their disruption of MFDs, and their abysmal work on portals. There is no acknowledgement by NA1K of their abysmal work on multiple portals, e.g.
4187:. If the arbitrators believe that such objections to reasoned analysis are well-founded in policy, then I invite ArbCom to assist making a summary finding to that effect, in which case I will promptly withdraw entirely from en.wp, thereby saving us all a lot of time.
1294:
was never really written as a guide to MFDs, and an approach to make it a formal guideline failed), leading to ad hoc guidelines being created by portal MFD regulars, but never turned into real guidelines. Many arguments both on the keep or delete side tend to be
4066:
That's blunt (and not the words I would have used), but in wp discussions we can't rely on other editors understanding subtle hints so being blunt should be a much lesser "sin" than being dishonest (or being reckless about whether the statements one's making are
3197:
resulted in a moratorium on the creation of portals. The reasons for the creation of thousands of portals were never clearly stated, but it is clear that some editors consider creating portals to be fun, and some editors think that portals are technically neat.
2668:
4526:
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.
4498:
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.
1010:"If your comprehension was that poor, it would make your comment an unintentional untruth rather than a deliberate untruth. However, the fact remain that regardless of whether you are confused or mendacious, your keep vote is based on an untrue statement."
2720:
will show. Both Certes and Kusma are ignoring the spirit of the above consensus about ending aesthetic-only valuations of portals and the consensus reached in many hundreds of MfD's about the usefulness of page views, as they use portal space to have fun.
2753:
and initially clashed over many longevity CfD's because I didn't know what I was doing, as can be seen. We further clashed over longevity matters, which a troll worsened by creating a hacking dispute, which resulted in me leaving Knowledge for awhile and
3380:
is a very good example and outside of the MfD where most of the discussion/negativity occurred. In this discussion, there were a number of editors interested in improving the portal, and I made an attempt to identify each of the points BHG brought up
3241:
2145:
they performed the drive-by, rapid-fire reversions, not before. The user has cited WP:FAITACCOMPLI, but this does not hold water: I have been working on many of these for months, but admittedly not all of them. Others have also disagreed, such as
806:
and clicking on a few of the portals to confirm the accuracy.) So it's a bit of a stretch to describe NA1K's improvements as even a minor breach of WP:FAIT, let alone an "extraordinarily huge" one. That description could more fairly describe BHGs
599:
2111:
3614:
BrownHairedGirl and at least one other vocal editor dismiss portals as "playgrounds" and by implication, those who work on them as children. Ditto referring to them as mere "hobbies" which have no place on Knowledge, as if portal editors are
865:
2920:
4205:
Knowledge is an encyclopedia. Its contents are subject to a process of continued improvement, which requires critical analysis. Many of the editors defending portals appear unable and/or unwilling to engage in that process. See e.g.
2640:
It greatly unbalanced the POV of dozens of portals in hostile takeovers NA1K hid from all other interested parties (e.g. associated WikiProjects), including in their generic edit summaries on the portals, until called out by BHG. At
1040:"What on earth is wrong with you? What are you trying to achieve by continually misrepresenting both the guideline and the discussion? Your campaign of deceit and misrepresentation is is completely transparent, and it is shameless."
3582:
2937:. Many more portals were created, some on narrow topics and containing errors, but almost all were soon deleted. The deletion process then turned to existing portals. Early MfDs correctly targeted the worst portals but relied on
2735:
528:
Throughout this entire conflict, the user BrownHairedGirl has exhibited bad behavior through harassment and mass reverting. Most of the harassment is targeted at the user Northamerica1000, a user who is trying to improve portals.
4447:, I am led to believe that some sort of tipping point has been reached in at least part of Knowledge's editor base, where hostility to critical analsyis has gained critical mass. Sadly, this seems to extend even to some admins:
3149:
3361:
3249:
engages in extensive hasty updates to portals that are being nominated for deletion. These edits make the portals under discussion moving targets, and difficult to evaluate as to whether they serve an encyclopedic purpose.
2828:
BHG is a selfless, talented, and forgiving editor who has demonstrated an ability to turn unproductive (and dare I say nasty) relationships into close, productive ones for Knowledge. That is who the evidence shows she is.
655:
2499:
3212:
2205:
1548:
3430:
2851:
2730:
2441:
As I'll quickly run out of diffs if I keep that up I'll just note the other AN/ANI threads in hopes that the arbitrators will look at the many examples of conduct with-in that points to issues in the portals space:
1269:
and many more). The counterclaim was that supporters of interpretation (B) ignored maintenance concerns. I thought it could be beneficial to separate the "broadness" and the "maintenance" requirements. My update to
820:
3755:
2204:. It can also be said that an implied consensus already exists for using transclusion templates, because many portals that I have not contributed significantly to are already using them, such as those listed here:
1239:
3259:
4423:
This whole saga has been a sustained effort by a small crew of portal fans to defend by any means their huge collection of abysmal, abandoned portals, and the abysmal quality of the efforts of NA1K to indulge in
1166:
889:
2763:
2210:
3957:
2713:
1892:
1233:
988:"It is a waste of the community's time for a linguistically-challenged "editor" to be free to unilaterally start to waste the community's time with this sort of straw man game." (Note: referring to User:Moxy)
958:
862:
2115:
2161:
644:
3119:
2488:
2058:
801:
NA1K's improvements were executed over a period of several weeks, largely including talk page comments, and multiple individual edits to each portal (This can be quickly verified by looking at the tables
3493:
the community at large does not agree with the statements about being "sneaky, lying , no talk started, etc.." and has fixed the so called "black box problem" that was not understood by most - even
3192:
and other editors (acting as a task force) created thousands of low-quality portals by automation in the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, before an otherwise inconclusive discussion at
2202:
1819:
3018:
2118:
3440:
2838:
1379:, the only one portal I have really worked on, also belongs in this list. In any case, all of these are serious attempts at presenting Knowledge content, inviting people to read and to contribute. —
3236:
2261:
4154:
process which focused almost entirely on presentation, and almost never even considered the selection of articles. I have found no FP review which examined the portal by a checklist of criteria.
1004:
936:
789:
that BHG seems to read his reasonable argument as evidence of dishonestly. Every other statement I've seen alleging bad faith by the pro editors is either evidence free, or equally unconvincing.
522:
3179:
1613:, many users have already directly stated that BHG has been committing highly unacceptable conduct violations, including Moxy, Mark Schierbecker, Knowledgekid87, Kusma, Certes, Hecato (also see
1115:
3530:
3503:
forward. Also would be best we explain to newer editors that terms like "portal advocates" or " playground" shows bias on the posting editor side and is considered a personal attack by many.--
2910:
2271:
of the matter. Period. However, editors still refer to it because most portals remain based upon its suggestions. I have also further explained my stance regarding POG and deletion discussions
1355:
There are some rather good portals out there that still work well as "mini main pages", combining "showcase", "navigation", and "invite collaboration" elements to some degree. Examples include
1310:, a page where discussion between portal supporters and portal critics has been mostly productive and de-personalised. (Discussion may seem to have stopped, but in my view that is just because
3490:
3002:
2994:
2663:
932:
861:
was (I believe) one of the first community discussions calling into question the usefulness of portals in general, it wasn't until the massive portalspam frenzy was addressed that there were
704:
565:
2716:
ended the abandoned playground practice of giving comprehensive endorsements to certain portals, overwhelmingly on aesthetic value only grounds as any reading of the analysis at a FP review
1224:
Portals were created sometime in 2005, as topic specific mini Main Pages. Many portals did age poorly and were unmaintained for years, bringing the entire namespace in disrepute, leading to
4304:. There has been much criticism of that comment, but while my choice of words was harsh, I stand by the substance: that NA1K's work was not that of a competent editor acting in good faith.
4241:
caused long dramas due their failure to understand very basic statistics. NA1K posted the total pageviews for a period, rather than the daily averages used by every other editor. See e.g.
1201:
3932:
My proposal: "It also doesn't seem common sense/IAR to delete to this non-portal regular. An essay which organizes the deletion thoughts would perhaps be a helpful reference to outsiders."
3609:
3534:
3283:
to ratify it, which instead resulted in a failure to ratify the guidelines, which were then downgraded to a failed proposal. As a result, there are no guidelines for portals other than
3144:
3388:
This is in addition to the large number of personal attacks BHG levied mostly at NA1k but also at anyone who had a different opinion on portals, which are all evidenced above, such as
537:
are common as well. In the recent ANI, BHG created a section called "NA1K is gaming the system again". The name calling and verbal abuse of NA1K is present through other edits such as
3995:
3478:
3393:
884:
The only thing I agree with here is the fact that it was an overreaction, but again, it's time to look at the bigger picture. While NA1k certainly wasn't "lying", his arguments about
103:
1330:. BHG's confrontational approach to portals and especially her personalising of many issues feels like bullying, and has at times significantly decreased my enjoyment of Knowledge. —
593:
3043:, I had already assisted throughout the preceding year by creating and maintaining that Lua software which allows portals to avoid content forks. Editors not involved with portals
2848:
I don't recall ever participating in arbitration before, and as I've been avoiding portal discussions since May for reasons ably summarised by Kusma I was planning to sit this out.
1537:
3920:"... since we aren't arguing within any guidelines here, there's no 'statutes' we can fall back on, so instead of simplifying the argument ... we get drawn into long tangents ..."
3548:
3644:
3526:
to featured status in 2009 and have been one of its principal maintainers for the past 10 years. My direct involvement in the present Portal controversy has been fairly minimal:
1140:
3552:
2182:
The user has repeatedly engaged in the unilateral dictation of their instruction creep as demands that must be met, sometimes reverting portal improvements when they are not.
1813:
1734:
4488:
3962:
3889:
In addition to no guidelines, there is seemingly not even developed essays on portals, perhaps explaining the walls of text posted for MfD !votes (that overwhelm non-regulars)
3620:
3446:
1476:
and pattern of ongoing, extremely uncivil behavior toward me and other portal editors. Over the course of many months, BHG has continuously violated multiple conduct policies
681:
676:, to suggest that she refrain from characterizing editors with whom she has policy disagreements as liars. These discussions generally arose in response to statements made in
3184:
905:
NA1k claimed that POG could still be used as an advisory essay despite being a failed proposal, yet beforehand...in his vote in the aforementioned RfC, he called POG's lead "
4340:
In the same section, NA1K claims that I objected both to the use of content forks in portals, and of transclusions. Not so: I repeatedly supported th use of transclusieons
3743:
An article should be assessed based on whether it has a realistic potential for expansion, not how frequently it has been edited to date. Remember that there is no deadline.
1909:
users directly stated that BHG needed to immediately stop violating conduct policies such as making personal attacks, acting uncivilly and engaging in battleground conduct:
785:
782:
550:
546:
98:
4314:
3764:
3352:), I don't really see any exaggeration in BHG's qualification of behaviour by other editors, when she's confronted with some rather egregious examples of such behaviour. --
2654:'s nom describes in detail how poor NA1K's update was. An editor with such conduct does not have the competence or judgement to participate in portal space constructively.
2171:
4037:- "I didn't call them maintainers. Simply many of them are highly active editors likely watching the page, who would be able to stop vandalism and make small corrections."
3604:
3560:
2977:
2706:
2698:
2637:
2633:
2096:
408:
3563:. This latter one was so unpleasant, that I was basically driven off participating in any future discussions on improving portals, like several other experienced editors.
3207:
1658:
4117:
2818:
2802:
2461:
1437:
1422:
1041:
1026:
1021:
999:
2693:
2690:
2686:
1285:
1219:
538:
4234:
4091:
3752:
3629:
3596:
2822:
2717:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2284:
445:
277:
4321:
4128:
3599:
is a microcosm of the problem (my first and only interaction with her). BHG continually bludgeoned participants who disagreed with her, including me. I finally wrote
3556:
2190:
1682:
1679:
1410:
1016:
1011:
554:
2476:
2125:
92:
81:
52:
4075:
I've also seen incorrect/misleading statements made in portal related discussions I've been involved in; it make's it very difficult to have a sensible discussion.
1685:
1058:
From various MfDs. I have highlighted comment blocks by user BrownHairedGirl indiscriminately to give a rough visual reference. Diffs are last edit before closure.
946:
2456:
2239:
4242:
4170:
2750:
2217:
2107:
1854:
1345:
1317:
210:
51:
Any further edits made to this page may be reverted by an arbitrator or arbitration clerk without discussion. If you need to edit or modify this page, please go
3495:
1697:
1155:
1090:
765:
729:
4273:
NA1K's evidence here is so full of misrepresentations and counter-factuals that I don't have space here or time to rebut them all, but here are some examples:
3788:
2790:
2031:
2028:
2025:
4228:"Please bear in mind that portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers"
3840:
3544:. Some members of the group went on to create literally thousands of poor-quality, hopelessly narrow portals which was the genesis of the current controversy.
768:
him to relaunch WikiProject Portals & hence move on to his overly optimistic mass creations. (See talk page for a more detailed timeline of the dispute.)
2786:
439:
3805:"You aren't making the case effectively about gaming the system, because all that can be seen is your anger, and not a technical explanation of the issues."
2421:
2004:
1694:
868:, which could theoretically be applied to the fact that users observing these portals called into question other portals like them as well (as described in
3724:
3567:
3296:
1449:
1036:
1031:
989:
984:
979:
87:
4056:
4034:
4019:
3971:
2193:
1648:
1181:. Blocks an editor for making an April Fool's joke outside of article space. Block is widely criticized by other editors, and is only begrudgingly lifted.
3793:
3512:
2954:
4296:
the sytem by creating a smokescreen of FUD to obscure fact that without discussion or notification or transparecy, they had created a massive breach of
3349:
2050:
1780:
994:
4409:
4352:
4289:
4267:
3389:
3111:
3044:
2702:
2158:
process, making it impossible for portals to be expanded or improved, which further reinforces their preconceived notions that most should be deleted.
2016:
1127:
1125:
1123:
1121:
896:
4231:
3879:
3719:
3623:
2961:
in which two thirds of established portals disappeared within a year. All protest was bludgeoned away, leading to uncivil personal conflicts between
2373:
and suggests NA1K "need to desist from defending this flood of portalspam." and is "at best reckless; at worst, it was wilful disregard of consensus"
1676:
4417:
4207:
2642:
576:
403:
3933:
3926:
3921:
3777:
3770:
3761:
4281:. In reality, in each case I was trying to uphold established consnensus-building processes. For example, one of portals which I had reverted was
4101:
3909:
3904:
3899:
3865:
3860:
3855:
3827:
3825:
3823:
3821:
3819:
3626:
2950:
2798:
1988:
1794:
1688:
1249:
1096:
779:
530:
435:
231:
223:
70:
4217:
4211:
3890:
3541:
2047:
1969:
1966:
1963:
1960:
1957:
1954:
1951:
1948:
1945:
1942:
1939:
1936:
1933:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1921:
1916:
1910:
1878:
1851:
1797:
1304:
772:
584:
558:
534:
3500:
2814:
2794:
2674:
2013:
1991:
1902:
1845:
1755:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1743:
1740:
1737:
1725:
1715:
1691:
1307:
1258:
972:
893:
4332:
3264:
2864:
regional/language bias, breadth of coverage, tone, relevance, accessibility, currency and other non-aesthetic considerations. See eg reviews of
2177:
1327:
4413:
4263:
4245:
4184:
4097:
3947:
3522:
I'm primarily a content editor. In my 13 years on Knowledge, I've created over 700 articles on opera and arts-related subjects. I helped bring
2810:
2806:
2505:
2022:
2019:
1848:
1761:
1645:
1454:
1404:
3600:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2771:
2767:
2629:
2130:. Keeping portals in an inferior state makes deletion easier to obtain, whereas improved portals are typically more difficult to get deleted.
1994:
1857:
1832:
1829:
1703:
1700:
1267:
1020:"because NA1K is a shamelessly deceitful serial liar", "calculated mendacity in which NA1K is engaging here cannot be mistaken as accidental"
4133:
portals have become detached from content creation and from WikiProjects, and are now largely the domain of editors who specialise in portals
4122:
4078:
2843:
2272:
2253:
2233:
2147:
1913:
1871:
1800:
808:
794:
677:
377:
3106:
3091:
2989:
2229:), yet long afterward, BHG acted like they never saw my post on their talk page, complaining months later about an already resolved matter:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1803:
1394:
1264:
4521:
4512:
4451:
even went so far as to give me my only block in 14 years for challenging the good faith and competence of another editor, asserting that I
4248:
3064:
1824:
BHG has a very poor habit of making negative, attacking armchair proclamations about how they perceive the intelligence of other users:
1323:
1261:
1236:, which was started by BHG. NA1k noticed a flaw in the nomination, told BHG about it, she fixed it, everybody thanked each other nicely.
227:
3845:
3654:
3366:
3332:
2858:
the abandoned playground practice of giving comprehensive endorsements to certain portals, overwhelmingly on aesthetic value only grounds
517:
397:
242:
220:
65:
29:
4435:
sustained pattern of poor skills and hostility to critical analysis, and it has left me deeply disillusioned with Knowledge as a whole.
3385:. However, BHG continued to block the consensus-building process - see my comment at 02:25 on 4 November trying to gauge the consensus.
3343:
its dynamics is gliding (currently at a fast pace apparently) towards a walled garden enterprise. Also, BHG is an editor who is sure to
2427:
2418:
2412:
2393:
2374:
2371:
2364:
2361:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2345:
2343:
2338:
2319:
2317:
2315:
1213:
3517:
2494:
2275:. Also of note is that BHG noticeably appears to never castigate delete !voters at MfD who refer to aspects of POG after its demotion.
735:
478:
430:
368:
287:
215:
4493:
4161:
was tagged as a guideline for years, but the portal fans had it delisted when it was applied to support deletion of junk portals: see
3754:
I explained that the errors were fixed and that "'Four never-updated entries' is a red herring, unless there is something out-of-date"
3577:
2466:
3435:
1399:
393:
3005:
with Twinkle. This is far from being a symmetrical dispute between two groups who need to be admonished equally. It is verging on
2230:
4151:
3325:
who has demonstrated an ability to turn unproductive (and dare I say nasty) relationships into close, productive ones for Knowledge
3039:, accompanied by a diff in which I mention fixing three portals which caused Lua errors. Although cleaning up other editors' work
2755:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2415:
1161:
1070:
504:
373:
4253:
2080:
1673:
1280:
383:
363:
246:
4429:
4327:
3632:
2825:
was cast at one MfD by the portal's creator. This is all thanks to the portal evaluation and nom writing skills BHG taught me.
2174:
1809:
1722:
1709:
1706:
3009:
of the Portal: namespace. Stewardship is welcome, but not when that steward's clear objective is to delete most of the pages.
1109:
750:
388:
301:
282:
4320:
sanctions without any attempt to engage the relevant Wikiprojects, and failed to even meet their own simplistic criteria (see
2983:
2294:
I've noticed that there hasn't been a lot of evidence submitted. That's not because there isn't any. For instance at just the
2128:
2037:
2034:
1864:
1768:
1728:
1532:
Conversely, improving portals on Knowledge is not deviant, wrong or improper, and is congruent with building an encyclopedia.
1083:
351:
4483:
3649:
3574:
3301:
2471:
2451:
2199:
1469:
1418:
1176:
422:
313:
3704:
3698:
3692:
3686:
3680:
3674:
3668:
3884:
3763:
I explained that someone fixed it, so "nobody" is incorrect, and the lack of portal guideline makes for a "kangaroo court".
2915:
2446:
2265:
2227:
2207:. This implied consensus has been strengthened per the obvious overall support for transclusion use in portals at the RfC.
2196:
1712:
963:
825:
650:
346:
4458:
4455:
3811:
3806:
2044:
2007:
1787:
1584:
1581:
1575:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1554:
1232:
but more visually attractive. In April 2019, a huge number of the quickly-created fully automated portals was deleted in
3425:
2993:
and similar. If no statement alone gives cause for concern then their sheer volume does – for dozens more examples, see
1610:
1276:(trying to state the fact that portals need maintenance and removing details about update schedules) was reverted by BHG
1206:
1186:
869:
669:
272:
201:
25:
2170:
and scolding on portal talk and discussion pages, making it difficult for any progress to occur. Some examples include:
714:
support proposals to desysop BrownHairedGirl. I believe that the concerns raised can be addressed with lesser measures.
4453:
fail to see that making judgements about other people's motives and questioning their intelligence is a personal attack
3483:
1350:
1277:
1274:
4502:
2544:, edits to make a very basic short response. The same type of halting behavior happens on portals themselves, such as
1179:
4213:, after about a dozen editors had failed to spot the problem ... but despite that evidence, the MFD was denoubced as
3592:
2224:
2221:
2053:
2010:
1997:
1981:
1838:
1835:
1777:
1771:
1731:
1541:
1441:
608:
1. Harassment. Plenty of evidence is prominent through diffs and this discussion. Targets other users. This violates
4010:: Lots of prominent editors with tens/hundreds of thousands of edits here, most probably watchlisting the page ... "
2781:. She also helped encourage and foster my skills at evaluating and nominating portals for deletion, as seen in this
2899:
is to request their deletion, feels typical of the hostile climate that made me walk away from portal discussions.
2885:
1064:
3023:
4286:
3225:
2714:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#RfC about marking the Featured portals process as .22historical.22
2295:
2093:
2090:
2087:
2084:
338:
178:
2508:, they re-made a long abandoned portal and inexplicably left a sub-page about a dead person the portal said was
1252:, where the debate between BHG and NA1k is already in full swing. It seems to be mostly about how to understand
619:. BHG does not reason properly as she erupts into poor judgement and accusations. She breaches multiple policies
3344:
2889:
2548:, where NA1K rapidly made reams of undiscussed updates without clarifying what, how, or why changes were made:
1515:
1322:
Several people have left portal-related discussion after finding interaction with BHG unpleasant, including me
1314:, who has moderated the discussion so far, is apparently on a break. I expect us to continue when SW returns).
1103:
542:
324:
267:
21:
1596:
1593:
1587:
1077:
660:
I have only one "argument", which is to restate my relevant comments from the discussion proposing this case:
2481:
2076:
1586:). However, four users then objected on the unblocking admin's talk page, stating that the block was proper:
1500:
834:
Rebuttal: Portal advocates have only occasionally presented credible arguments in portal deletion discussions
259:
2360:
Certes and willingness of portal creators to "clean up the mess created by the WikiProject and its members"
1303:. For an example how this plays out, here is an experienced editor arriving at their first ever portal MFD:
497:
309:
207:
4439:
this wall of half-truths and falsehoods, I lean to the conclusion that Mark Twain's advice may be right.
3660:
2865:
1590:
1390:
1341:
1279:, who claimed these changes were controversial but also seemed to oppose having an update schedule there
745:
There's been little wrong doing by pro portal editors; assertions to the contrary collapse under scrutiny
533:
is an example of harassment on Northamerica1000. Northamerica is frequently a target as differences like
319:
237:
2289:
1602:
BrownHairedGirl has performed ongoing continuous personal attacks, uncivil behaviors and the casting of
879:"Those three diffs are of edits where I provide evidence to show that NA1K was systematically lying ..."
773:"Those three diffs are of edits where I provide evidence to show that NA1K was systematically lying ..."
626:
by reverting other admin's edits. She reverts other users edits without consensus and does not consider
3357:
2869:
358:
4222:
By far the worst has been NA1K, whorepeatedly cherrypicked guidelines, and persisted when challenged.
3540:
every portal to this "improved" version unless the portal had a designated maintainer. I consequently
931:
from NA1k because she thought it needed to be formally discussed first, as she repeatedly affirmed in
4479:
4113:
3453:
by accusing him of dishonesty. Her posts in that discussion are littered with derisive terms such as
3292:
3255:
3232:
3203:
3175:
3140:
2975:... it is hard not to see a pattern emerging. The pre-emptive attack became a feature, for example:
2905:
1463:
3908:
BHG response: "if you choose to not even speed-read a numbered list of points, that is your choice."
1976:
comments at this ANI discussion, BHG has been repeatedly asked to desist elsewhere, for months now:
3986:. This portal was created ... by ... who also seems to have been its only significant contributor."
3331:
My evidence to support that is a long discussion I once had with another editor on BHG's talk page
3952:
2881:
1248:
I didn't pay any attention for a few months, mainly because of Framgate. Next thing I noticed was
3773:
3417:
3336:
3073:
3055:, have copied it to several other wikipedias, and are pursuing a WMF grant to extend it further.
3040:
2946:
1623:
1300:
490:
145:
56:
3445:
BHG's mistreatment of NA1K has been discussed in detail, but let's not overlook her behavior at
3376:
The difficulty with this type of case is there's lots of potential evidence, but the discussion
3226:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive307#Thousands_of_Portals
3220:
These portals were discussed at length by the community between February 2019 and April 2019 at
1559:
Prior to the block, several users asked BHG on their talk page to stop making personal attacks:
673:
4144:
4139:) have collectively demonstrated low competence in maintaining and managing portals, e.g. they
3640:
3189:
2834:
2726:
2659:
2110:), most users in the "Should BrownHairedGirl's mass portal reversions be reverted..." section (
2064:
1520:
1510:
1052:
927:
919:
878:
847:
816:
761:
710:
In light of certain other statements posted on this page, I would like to make clear that I do
3399:
I also don't know if anyone has mentioned BHG's mass reversion of NA1k's edits through gaming
2978:
It will be interesting to see which portalistas deploy which of the usual bogus-keep arguments
2248:
after it's demotion from being a guideline page, yet BHG engaged in the exact same behaviors,
689:
addressing the character of disagreeing parties, rather than the subject of the disagreement.
3854:"This is almighty mess: an admin has sneakily and avoidably built a massively POV portal ..."
3474:
3353:
3246:
3167:
2966:
2942:
2873:
2280:
1617:
1445:
197:
17:
4179:
The nature of their resistance is well-summarised in their own evidence to this case. e.g.:
4143:
collaborated in the creation of about 4,000 spam portals, mostly created at rapid speed by @
3573:
However, I've observed many of the other interactions which have resulted in this case, e.g.
3382:
3078:
2971:
1282:. I stopped trying to improve the guideline afterwards, as I do not enjoy arguing with BHG.
4470:
4444:
4374:
4342:
provided that a linked list of the transcluded pages is displayed on the face of the portal
4109:
4080:
3864:"It's a very sad indicator of the state of portal-space that an actual admin describes ..."
3288:
3251:
3228:
3199:
3171:
3159:
3151:
3136:
3128:
3113:
2962:
2930:
2900:
2896:
2741:
2646:
2352:
Twice writes Transhumanist has not been acting in good faith and supplies supporting diffs
2257:
1633:
1603:
1505:
1485:
1459:
1225:
1197:
858:
757:
665:
623:
605:
Reasons for Desysop of BrownHairedGirl (Copied from my ANI proposal). Diffs provided above:
583:
sums it up well. The behavior is unacceptable in discussions and I have been the target of
120:
3663:(WP:POG) was marked as a guideline for over a decade until recently. Here is its history:
3372:
BrownHairedGirl has gamed the system and engaged in battleground behaviour in Portal Space
2877:
8:
3072:
repeats the claim that I prioritise page quality over page views. I repeat that this is
3031:
judges that I support portals. I agree, though even in the selected quotes I state that
3006:
2998:
1620:
1035:"that's a blatant lie (as in something which you stated it when you knew to be untrue)."
616:
609:
580:
569:
131:
2856:
However, I'd like to respond to Newshunter12's comment on the featured portal process: "
1436:(XNRs) were deletion reasons about 14 years ago. The root cause of this case could be a
1290:
One general problem with portal MFDs is the lack of applicable policies and guidelines (
1030:"Moxy, either you are either a congenital liar or you have a very poor grasp of facts."
4397:
by reverting NA1K's edits. False: I did not use admin tools for those reverts. I used
4317:
3738:
3735:
If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD.
3412:
3396:. As I mentioned on ANI once, this was so unpleasant it nearly drove me off Knowledge.
3033:
We should certainly delete portals which have too narrow a scope or are of poor quality
2895:
I'd also add, the tone of the remark I quote from, originating from someone whose only
1495:
1490:
1048:
639:
588:
140:
3965:
has been mentioned above by several editors critical of BHG. The relevant edits are:
1421:
sub-page. The redirect was deleted, and I reported the general issue on the WP:SPEEDY
4398:
3943:
3875:
3836:
3784:
3715:
3636:
3404:
3312:
3132:
3069:
2830:
2722:
2655:
2186:
2167:
2138:
853:
In this particular case, I think it's better to look at the bigger picture. While it
839:
812:
4308:
2426:
Accuses Legacypac "as having a penchant for scolding content creators on Knowledge"
4282:
4278:
4136:
3730:
3470:
3102:
3087:
3060:
3014:
2997:. Meanwhile, NA1K's valiant efforts to improve portals were undone. If some were
2349:
Strong support for "any other restraint on TTH, up to and including perma-siteban"
2151:
2068:
1553:
BHG continued their personal attacks and was blocked for them on 17 November 2019:
1525:
1151:
1136:
1051:
portal related discussions and makes participation unappealing to other users with
954:
724:
699:
627:
4131:, whch should be read as part of this evidence. The core issue is as noted there:
4022:- "Look at who you are calling maintainers. added which was immediately reverted
3307:
Additional evidence for "BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to ... Knowledge"
3491:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1020#Portal updates reverted
1808:
BHG has also cast aspersions against me in areas I have not even contributed to:
1614:
1386:
1356:
1337:
1311:
1193:
167:
115:
4157:
Did not establish community connensus for the purpose or structure of portals.
2669:
Certes and Kusma both view portals as playgrounds, not useful encyclopedia tools
545:
is an example of the reverting that takes place. Additional evidence is through
4508:
before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person
4465:
4461:
4297:
4293:
4168:
1127 of the ~1400 remaining portals remain in Category:Unassessed Portal pages.
4105:
4087:
before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person
3505:
3377:
3028:
2545:
2504:
NA1K has repeatedly added content to portals in a sloppy, haphazard manner. On
1668:
of BHG's ongoing various breaches of conduct policies; further examples exist:
1473:
1376:
1260:(although this is part of a large series of similar (templated?) delete votes:
631:
156:
126:
4334:: Australia, where I challenged the use of partisan canvassing of a discussion
3659:
Currently, there are no portal guidelines that debates can refer to. However,
3535:"There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals"
564:
The harassment has been noticed by the community, with a whole section titled
462:
4425:
4316:: Northern Ireland, where NA1K made widespread changes to an page subject to
4223:
4191:
4166:
Did not mainatain systematic assessment of portals. In May 2019 I noted that
4158:
3400:
3284:
3280:
3275:
3265:
2958:
2938:
2245:
2155:
2060:
1414:
1372:
1296:
1291:
1271:
1253:
1241:
1229:
885:
4230:, but NA1K repeatedly omitted the crucial second part of the sentence. e.g.
3810:
BHG response:"And NA1K's choice ... was just plain devious and manipulative"
2935:
a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time
1409:
I stumbled over a technical issue with the portal namespace in May 2019: An
466:
4448:
3939:
3871:
3832:
3780:
3747:
Should portals be different? One MfD was opened with the main rationale of
3711:
3693:"Update" and "Guideline" tags removed, tagged as guideline under discussion
3583:
BrownHairedGirl's persistent denigration of editors with whom she disagrees
3523:
3271:
3242:
Northamerica1000 Engages in Rescue Squadron Behavior with regard to portals
3221:
3214:
3194:
3163:
2762:. Months later, we clashed again over longevity matters and I called her a
1364:
1360:
4373:. Not so: calling out another editor's misconduct where it occurs in not
1625:), Lepricavark, AmericanAir88, Lightburst, WaltCip and Narutolovehinata5.
42:
3098:
3083:
3056:
3010:
2678:
2141:
for portal deletion based upon their preconceived notions. This occurred
1147:
1132:
950:
827:
715:
690:
2712:
There is also precedent for shutting down such playground behavior. The
575:
BHG isn't just harassing NorthAmerica, she harasses other users like in
3450:
2759:
2682:
2307:(18 replies in 13 threads - 1 duplicate !vote struck by another editor)
1381:
1368:
1332:
600:
BrownHairedGirl should be desysopped as the user violates admin conduct
162:
4195:
2133:
BHG has engaged in cherry picking policies to excuse their reversions
908:
186:
151:
4288:
to the status quo ante. The reality can be seen in he discussion at
3053:
one of the best ideas I've seen to improve Knowledge in recent years
2185:
At MfD discussions, the user has based deletion in part upon portal
1549:
BrownHairedGirl was blocked on 17 November 2019 for personal attacks
3958:
Some of the allegations made against BHG don't stand up to scrutiny
464:
4329:: Australia, where nearly all my points were upheld in discusison.
4096:
I've not had much to do with this portal matter but just read the
3772:
BHG made arguments about needing volunteers that to me go against
3394:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Australian rules football
4129:
WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals#Statement_by_BrownHairedGirl
4127:
Much I need to say about this case is in my opening statement at
3313:#BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to portals and Knowledge
2645:, a portal NA1K re-made was deleted yet again for being junk and
2211:
BrownHairedGirl interrogates inappropriately in attempts to smear
1577:. BHG did not heed these requests, and was subsequently blocked.
993:"WARMONGER Certes ", " The Transhumanist (TTH) and his cronies "
978:" Moxy's deep deficiency in logic and of reading comprehension "
888:
were logical fallacies regardless. The fact of the matter is, he
764:'s own words, the failed proposal to mass delete portals is what
3798:
BrownHairedGirl makes personal attacks at inappropriate forums.
2736:
BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to portals and Knowledge
1893:
BrownHairedGirl does not heed advice of others to stop attacking
4309:
BrownHairedGirl orders what can and cannot be done with portals
3619:
not valid contributors deserving respect in disagreements e.g.
2162:
BrownHairedGirl orders what can and cannot be done with portals
467:
3757:
BrownHairedGirl supported the nominator's deadline rationale:
3447:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ohio State University
1628:
BHG continuouosly badgers and derides me and other users, yet
1005:
BrownHairedGirl calls other editors liars/mendacious/deceitful
682:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ohio State University
656:
BrownHairedGirl needs to temper her communications with others
468:
2099:. This ongoing ownership makes improving portals impossible.
1820:
BrownHairedGirl attacks by proclaiming users as unintelligent
1146:
Note: Updated the 4th image. Accidentally marked too much. --
4059:- "that is a staggeringly dishonest, bad faith summary. ..."
3898:"The wall of text above this comment is not appreciated ..."
2819:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Special operations
664:
For full disclosure, I have twice initiated discussions on
3566:
In the September 2019 Village Pump proposal, I once again
3274:
has provided a history of the document that served as the
2420:
supports fairly broad set of possible portal topics (e.g.
1632:
to qualify their claims, in direct, constant violation of
937:
recently agreed to start discussing the "black box" format
3859:"Thryduulf is an admin, and should know a lot better ..."
2298:
thread you have (when looking at only involved parties):
838:
This is a firm rebuttal to each respective point made by
4363:
4351:. This is an inversion of the truth, whch I set out at
3850:
BHG holds other admins to a higher standard as editors:
2949:: an argument to avoid). The numerous examples include
2500:
NorthAmerica1000's sub-par contributions to portal space
2363:(after this Certes does show willingness to do clean-up
1167:
Background information on blocks made by BrownHairedGirl
3316:
3124:
I agree with and will refer to the evidence entered by
2852:
Response to Newshunter12 re the featured portal process
2751:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 7
2226:), and also provided more information at my talk page (
3213:
Discussion of the Thousands of Low-Quality Portals at
3037:
after this Certes does show willingness to do clean-up
2921:
BrownHairedGirl bludgeons and discourages debate with
892:
the adoption of POG as an official guideline, and yet
3903:"I didn't read every point in your wall of text, ..."
2411:
Opposed to mass deletion, wants "case-by-case basis"
848:"The disputes began with" The Transhumanist (TTH)..."
751:"The disputes began with" The Transhumanist (TTH) ...
3768:
I also sympathise with the 'kangaroo court' argument
3699:
Under discussion removed, tagged as information page
1429:does not cover the portal namespace, among others.
4324:), and objected to challenges to their recklessness
4045:
watching the portal's subpages e.g. for vandalism).
2957:. Later MfDs relied on early results, leading to a
2342:Core concern seems to be time spent to cleanup ex:
2095:), and at thirteen more at the portal pages listed
811:mass reverts, which were all done on a single day.
612:
and is against Knowledge policy through the pilars.
4383:. No evidence is offered in support of this claim
3390:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport
3333:here (which I call the "walled garden" discussion)
3323:BHG is a selfless, talented, and forgiving editor
2945:(applicable only to articles) and low page views (
2703:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Christmas
2435:No participation by Moxy, ToThAc, and Newshunter12
2252:it was demoted, as demonstrated in my ANI comment
572:sums up the situation at the recent ANI very well.
4348:
3441:BHG has made aggressive accusations of dishonesty
2643:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Djibouti
2370:Is already "Tired of defending the indefensible"
1286:Portal MFDs are not governed by agreed upon rules
1220:Early portal deletions were not too controversial
1116:BrownHairedGirl insults the work of other editors
756:It's probably more accurate to say it began with
3542:listed myself there as Portal:Opera's maintainer
3120:Agreement with Evidence Entered by Other Parties
2785:, which led to eight comprehensive nominations (
1250:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Armenia
920:"extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI"
795:"extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI"
3501:User talk:Scottywong/Portal guideline workspace
3499:that input from this "Arbitration" can move
3162:is of an evidentiary nature, and documents the
2675:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Monaco
1636:. This has been an ongoing serious problem for
1308:User talk:Scottywong/Portal guideline workspace
3097:intended meaning, and I regret the ambiguity.
1758:(directly misrepresents previous user comment)
523:BrownHairedGirl exhibits unacceptable behavior
3531:I opposed the wholesale deletion Portal space
3489:community and Knowledge itself. As seen at
2821:was SNOW delete). At my MfD's, only a single
2166:BHG engages in enormous levels of badgering,
903:But here's where the real contradiction lies:
678:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Golf
498:
4408:standard of their work (see portal MFDs for
4285:, where NA1K cites the diff where I reverted
4185:objects to my posting of detailed rationales
3449:. In that discussion, she repeated attacked
3403:, even though BRD clearly did not apply per
918:NA1K's improvements to ~100 portals were an
793:NA1K's improvements to ~100 portals were an
622:3. Reverting and edit warring. Violation of
4353:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport
4290:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport
4268:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport
4252:misrepresented guidelines (e.g. my reply at
3610:Persistent trivialisation of portal editors
2487:I'll conclude by noting that Legacypac was
2264:) and refer to my comment and links there:
1897:At the most recent ANI discussion, titled "
49:The Evidence phase for this case is closed.
2337:Presents timeline of dispute to that date
505:
491:
4302:NA1K is either an idiot or a liar or both
3547:I participated on 4 portal MFDs, !voting
3533:at the first RFC closed in April 2018 as
2984:drive-by portalistas who made this comedy
1655:Civility issues with User:BrownHairedGirl
1306:. Rules are currently being worked on at
949:for more evidence concerning this point.
566:Civility issues with User:BrownHairedGirl
4311:. But look at the examples NA!K cites:
4210:, where I demonstrated that it was spam
3963:The MFD for Portal:Ohio_State_University
3327:. That is who the evidence shows she is.
2267:. I was for POG's demotion based on the
1901:", that was closed on 18 November 2019 (
4264:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ghana
3001:, they should be improved further, not
14:
4503:Evidence presented by {your user name}
4200:as "insults the work of other editors"
2106:" that was closed on 16 October 2019 (
1538:temporary injunction regarding portals
1455:Evidence presented by Northamerica1000
4390:. Not so, and no evidence is offered.
4300:. That is what led me to write that
4123:Evidence presented by BrownHairedGirl
3759:Nobody wats to maintain ether portals
2941:(now recognised as not a guideline),
2844:Evidence presented by Espresso Addict
1657:” that was closed on 15 August 2019 (
1419:Portal:Current events/2016 November 1
1244:meant and it was difficult to resolve
973:BrownHairedGirl insults other editors
912:"...? Sounds like a half-truth to me.
4215:ideologically-driven portal deletion
3319:(my emphasis added in what follows):
2897:apparent contribution to portalspace
1619:), SportingFlyer, Vermont (also see
947:Newshunter12's preliminary statement
278:Clarification and Amendment requests
37:
4358:Some other falsehoods in evidence:
4135:. Those editors (mostly active at
3367:Evidence presented by SportingFlyer
3339:" type of endeavours in Knowledge.
3317:#Evidence presented by Newshunter12
2990:a shamelessly deceitful serial liar
2414:, defends portals they've created
2392:Favors portals being cleaned up ex:
1536:Furthermore, BHG violated Arbcom's
1472:) (BHG) has engaged in a long-term
518:Evidence presented by AmericanAir88
35:
3518:Evidence presented by Voceditenore
3348:of these discussions myself (e.g.
2817:), all of which closed as delete (
2495:Evidence presented by Newshunter12
2491:owing to portal related behavior.
2220:. I responded on their talk page (
1609:At the main arbitration case page
736:Evidence presented by FeydHuxtable
36:
4536:
3436:Evidence presented by Lepricavark
2244:BHG has scolded for referring to
1583:) which led to a block reversal (
1400:Evidence presented by 84.46.53.86
1318:Discussing with BHG is unpleasant
3999:
3975:
3751:along with a few fixable errors.
3185:Thousands of Low-Quality Portals
1162:Evidence presented by Tryptofish
1102:
1089:
1076:
1063:
185:
41:
4092:The MfD process is not reliable
3603:. Nevertheless, she kept it up
3035:. Barkeep goes on to say that
2290:Evidence presented by Barkeep49
2150:. In this process, BHG is also
1580:BHG posted an unblock request (
2102:At the ANI discussion titled "
1516:Knowledge:Ownership of content
1172:judgment as an administrator.
13:
1:
4118:22:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3789:21:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3725:Deadlines and compulsory work
3720:20:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3650:Evidence presented by Bagumba
3645:16:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3568:opposed deleting portal space
3551:, commenting but not !voting
3513:12:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3479:01:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3431:22:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3362:06:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3302:Evidence presented by Francis
3297:23:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3260:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3237:23:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3208:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3180:23:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
3145:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3107:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3092:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3065:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
3049:a great feature - easy to use
3019:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
2987:were repeatedly described as
2911:03:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2839:15:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2749:and I met over categories at
2731:15:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
2664:13:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
2285:05:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
2077:User:Northamerica1000/Portals
1653:At the AN discussion titled “
1501:Knowledge:No personal attacks
1450:15:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
1395:20:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1346:21:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
959:22:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
939:, but the point still stands.
821:13:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
730:03:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
705:05:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
645:06:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
594:06:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
4457:... yet as I noted in reply,
3953:Evidence presented by DexDor
3794:NPAs at inappropriate forums
3675:Tagged "needs to be updated"
2969:, BHG and Moxy, BHG and me,
2916:Evidence presented by Certes
2705:, which ignored the obvious
2512:, and when called out, took
2240:BrownHairedGirl games WP:POG
2075:and specific information at
1240:There was disagreement what
1202:22:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
1156:17:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
1141:14:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
964:Evidence presented by Hecato
668:'s user talk page, archived
651:Evidence presented by BD2412
638:Wikipedian should be doing.
409:Conflict of interest reports
7:
4522:{Write your assertion here}
4513:{Write your assertion here}
4494:{Write your assertion here}
4489:00:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
3948:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
3880:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
3841:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
3669:Tagged as content guideline
3661:Knowledge:Portal/Guidelines
2189:existing as content forks (
1207:Evidence presented by Kusma
899:on that failed proposal...?
804:in this ANI archive section
238:Search archived proceedings
10:
4541:
4395:Violation of WP:TOOLMISUSE
3484:Evidence presented by Moxy
2330:(18 replies in 10 threads)
1411:article namespace redirect
1216:is well worth looking at.
283:Arbitrator motion requests
4196:depicting my comments on
3705:Marked as failed proposal
2890:European military history
2404:(12 replies in 9 threads)
2059:BrownHairedGirl violates
1434:cross-namespace redirects
907:an illogical and bizarre
897:portal content selections
4381:does not reason properly
3597:Template:Featured portal
2385:(8 replies in 7 threads)
1774:(tells user to f*** off)
587:as well form the users.
4279:OWN, editwar and gaming
3126:and assertions made by
2104:Portal updates reverted
1432:Historical background,
1417:ended up on an obscure
1120:"rotten junk", "crud"
935:. Admittedly, NA1k has
4079:Evidence presented by
4008:Lots of of maintainers
3984:Lots of of maintainers
3329:
3315:, third subsection of
3190:User:The Transhumanist
3158:The statement made by
3112:Evidence Presented by
2892:, to list just a few.
2314:Supports portals. Ex:
1521:Knowledge:Edit warring
1234:this well-attended MfD
826:Evidence presented by
686:
3766:SportingFlyer wrote,
3321:
3247:User:Northamerica1000
3168:User:Northamerica1000
3150:Opening Statement by
2707:abandonment and decay
2092:), Portal:Transport (
1540:on 17 December 2019:
1405:Portals can be abused
926:The information page
662:
479:Track related changes
339:Arbitration Committee
179:Knowledge Arbitration
18:Knowledge:Arbitration
4322:my statement of case
4190:Hecato demonstrates
3846:Admin accountability
3687:Disputed tag removed
3655:No portal guidelines
3345:call a spade a spade
3281:Request for Comments
3170:and other editors.
3160:User:BrownHairedGirl
3152:User:BrownHairedGirl
3129:User:BrownHairedGirl
3114:User:Robert McClenon
1630:never provides diffs
1506:Knowledge:Harassment
666:User:BrownHairedGirl
561:location for attack.
288:Enforcement requests
216:Guide to arbitration
137:Drafting arbitrators
4277:NA1K accuses me of
4208:MFD:Portal:Painting
3741:suggests for AfDs:
2677:, portal advocates
2417:later softening to
1664:The following is a
1621:User:Vermont/BHGANI
933:this ANI discussion
581:User:Vermont/BHGANI
570:User:Vermont/BHGANI
4443:that I engaged in
3801:On her talk page:
3681:Tagged as disputed
3593:the TfD discussion
3285:Using Common Sense
3076:. I stand by the
2995:this AN discussion
1496:Knowledge:Civility
1440:technical issue. –
1297:arguments to avoid
310:Contentious topics
208:Arbitration policy
4487:
4347:NA1K claims that
4145:The Transhumanist
3818:At a portal MFD:
3591:My experience at
3496:Browns proponents
3276:Portal Guidelines
3266:Portal Guidelines
3133:User:Newshunter12
3041:is not compulsory
2909:
2870:Freedom of speech
2168:instruction creep
2139:confirmation bias
2043:September 2019:
1814:entire discussion
1775:
1759:
515:
514:
482:
450:
320:General sanctions
268:All open requests
198:About arbitration
171:
160:
149:
135:
124:
107:
99:Proposed decision
96:
85:
74:
63:
62:
4532:
4478:
4476:
4474:
4283:Portal:Transport
4006:
4003:
4002:
3982:
3979:
3978:
3774:WP:NOTCOMPULSORY
3749:Neglected portal
3511:
3508:
3428:
3420:
3354:Francis Schonken
3081:
2992:
2986:
2980:
2974:
2947:WP:NOBODYREADSIT
2903:
2747:
2745:
2709:of the portal.
2652:
2650:
2422:air conditioning
2402:Northamerica1000
2283:
1863:September 2019:
1773:
1767:September 2019:
1757:
1106:
1093:
1080:
1067:
1047:BrownHairedGirl
809:"truly shocking"
722:
697:
615:2. Violation of
507:
500:
493:
481:
476:
469:
448:
404:Clerk procedures
396:
354:
325:Editor sanctions
302:Active sanctions
260:Open proceedings
230:
189:
175:
174:
165:
154:
143:
129:
118:
101:
90:
79:
68:
45:
38:
4540:
4539:
4535:
4534:
4533:
4531:
4530:
4529:
4524:
4515:
4505:
4496:
4472:
4471:
4292:: that NA1K is
4152:Featured portal
4125:
4094:
4084:
4081:Andrew Davidson
4004:
4000:
3980:
3976:
3960:
3955:
3887:
3848:
3796:
3729:With articles,
3727:
3657:
3652:
3612:
3585:
3549:"Delete" on one
3520:
3509:
3504:
3486:
3443:
3438:
3424:
3416:
3374:
3369:
3309:
3304:
3289:Robert McClenon
3269:
3252:Robert McClenon
3244:
3229:Robert McClenon
3218:
3200:Robert McClenon
3187:
3172:Robert McClenon
3156:
3137:Robert McClenon
3127:
3122:
3117:
3079:only diff cited
3077:
3026:
2988:
2982:
2976:
2970:
2927:
2918:
2901:Espresso Addict
2854:
2846:
2743:
2742:
2738:
2671:
2648:
2647:
2502:
2497:
2292:
2279:
2242:
2213:
2164:
2137:, to support a
2072:
2065:WP:Edit warring
1895:
1877:November 2019:
1822:
1793:November 2019:
1615:User:Hecato/BHG
1607:
1551:
1530:
1511:WP:BATTLEGROUND
1460:BrownHairedGirl
1457:
1407:
1402:
1357:Portal:Cheshire
1353:
1320:
1288:
1246:
1222:
1209:
1169:
1164:
1118:
1111:
1107:
1098:
1094:
1085:
1081:
1072:
1068:
1056:
1007:
975:
966:
928:WP:FAITACCOMPLI
836:
831:
747:
738:
716:
691:
658:
653:
602:
525:
520:
511:
477:
471:
470:
465:
455:
454:
453:
442:
425:
415:
414:
413:
400:
392:
380:
355:
350:
341:
331:
330:
329:
304:
294:
293:
292:
262:
252:
249:
234:
226:
204:
173:
50:
34:
33:
32:
12:
11:
5:
4538:
4523:
4520:
4514:
4511:
4504:
4501:
4495:
4492:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4391:
4384:
4377:
4362:AmericanAir88
4338:
4337:
4336:
4335:
4330:
4325:
4305:
4259:
4258:
4257:
4256:
4250:
4203:
4202:
4188:
4173:
4172:
4164:
4155:
4148:
4124:
4121:
4106:Weather portal
4093:
4090:
4083:
4077:
4073:
4072:
4071:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4061:
4060:
4051:
4050:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4046:
4039:
4038:
4029:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4014:
4013:
4012:
4011:
3990:
3989:
3988:
3987:
3959:
3956:
3954:
3951:
3936:
3935:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3914:
3913:
3912:
3911:
3901:
3886:
3883:
3868:
3867:
3862:
3857:
3847:
3844:
3816:
3815:
3814:
3813:
3795:
3792:
3726:
3723:
3708:
3707:
3701:
3695:
3689:
3683:
3677:
3671:
3656:
3653:
3651:
3648:
3611:
3608:
3584:
3581:
3571:
3570:
3564:
3555:and "Keep" on
3545:
3537:
3519:
3516:
3485:
3482:
3463:stream of lies
3442:
3439:
3437:
3434:
3373:
3370:
3368:
3365:
3308:
3305:
3303:
3300:
3268:
3263:
3243:
3240:
3217:
3211:
3186:
3183:
3155:
3154:Is Evidentiary
3148:
3125:
3121:
3118:
3116:
3110:
3074:sound practice
3025:
3022:
2943:WP:CONTENTFORK
2926:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2853:
2850:
2845:
2842:
2737:
2734:
2670:
2667:
2546:Portal:Moldova
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2485:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2449:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2424:
2406:
2405:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2387:
2386:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2368:
2358:
2347:
2340:
2332:
2331:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2309:
2308:
2291:
2288:
2241:
2238:
2212:
2209:
2163:
2160:
2135:after the fact
2071:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2040:
2039:
2003:August 2019:
2000:
1999:
1984:
1983:
1974:In addition to
1894:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1874:
1873:
1870:October 2019:
1867:
1866:
1860:
1859:
1841:
1840:
1821:
1818:
1806:
1805:
1790:
1789:
1786:October 2019:
1783:
1782:
1764:
1763:
1718:
1717:
1606:
1600:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1529:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1482:
1474:smear campaign
1456:
1453:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1377:Portal:Germany
1352:
1349:
1319:
1316:
1299:, for example
1287:
1284:
1245:
1238:
1221:
1218:
1208:
1205:
1190:
1189:
1183:
1182:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1101:
1099:
1095:
1088:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1073:
1069:
1062:
1055:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1006:
1003:
1002:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
974:
971:
965:
962:
943:
942:
941:
940:
915:
914:
913:
900:
875:
874:
873:
866:mass deletions
835:
832:
830:
824:
799:
798:
776:
775:
754:
753:
746:
743:
737:
734:
733:
732:
657:
654:
652:
649:
648:
647:
635:
620:
613:
606:
601:
598:
597:
596:
573:
562:
555:Edit summaries
524:
521:
519:
516:
513:
512:
510:
509:
502:
495:
487:
484:
483:
473:
472:
463:
461:
460:
457:
456:
452:
451:
443:
438:
433:
427:
426:
421:
420:
417:
416:
412:
411:
406:
401:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
349:
343:
342:
337:
336:
333:
332:
328:
327:
322:
317:
306:
305:
300:
299:
296:
295:
291:
290:
285:
280:
275:
270:
264:
263:
258:
257:
254:
253:
251:
250:
245:
240:
235:
225:
218:
213:
205:
200:
194:
191:
190:
182:
181:
66:Main case page
64:
61:
60:
55:and create an
48:
46:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4537:
4528:
4519:
4510:
4509:
4500:
4491:
4490:
4485:
4481:
4477:
4467:
4463:
4459:
4456:
4454:
4450:
4446:
4445:WP:TOOLMISUSE
4440:
4436:
4432:
4430:
4427:
4421:
4419:
4415:
4411:
4400:
4396:
4392:
4389:
4385:
4382:
4378:
4376:
4375:WP:HARASSMENT
4372:
4368:
4367:
4365:
4361:
4360:
4359:
4356:
4354:
4350:
4349:BHG games POG
4345:
4343:
4333:
4331:
4328:
4326:
4323:
4319:
4315:
4313:
4312:
4310:
4306:
4303:
4299:
4295:
4291:
4287:
4284:
4280:
4276:
4275:
4274:
4271:
4269:
4265:
4254:
4251:
4249:
4247:with my reply
4246:
4243:
4240:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4236:
4235:
4232:
4229:
4225:
4220:
4218:
4216:
4212:
4209:
4201:
4199:
4193:
4189:
4186:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4177:
4171:
4169:
4165:
4162:
4160:
4156:
4153:
4149:
4146:
4142:
4141:
4140:
4138:
4134:
4130:
4120:
4119:
4115:
4111:
4107:
4103:
4099:
4089:
4088:
4082:
4076:
4065:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4058:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4052:
4043:
4042:
4041:
4040:
4036:
4033:
4032:
4031:
4030:
4025:
4021:
4018:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4009:
3997:
3994:
3993:
3992:
3991:
3985:
3973:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3966:
3964:
3950:
3949:
3945:
3941:
3934:
3931:
3927:
3924:
3923:
3922:
3919:
3918:
3917:
3910:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3902:
3900:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3892:
3891:
3885:Walls of text
3882:
3881:
3877:
3873:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3843:
3842:
3838:
3834:
3829:
3828:
3826:
3824:
3822:
3820:
3812:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3799:
3791:
3790:
3786:
3782:
3778:
3775:
3771:
3769:
3765:
3762:
3760:
3756:
3753:
3750:
3745:
3744:
3740:
3736:
3732:
3722:
3721:
3717:
3713:
3706:
3702:
3700:
3696:
3694:
3690:
3688:
3684:
3682:
3678:
3676:
3672:
3670:
3667:23 Oct 2008:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3662:
3647:
3646:
3642:
3638:
3634:
3633:
3630:
3627:
3624:
3621:
3618:
3607:
3605:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3589:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3569:
3565:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3543:
3538:
3536:
3532:
3529:
3528:
3527:
3525:
3515:
3514:
3507:
3502:
3497:
3492:
3481:
3480:
3476:
3472:
3468:
3464:
3460:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3433:
3432:
3429:
3427:
3421:
3419:
3414:
3413:SportingFlyer
3408:
3406:
3402:
3397:
3395:
3391:
3386:
3384:
3379:
3364:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3346:
3340:
3338:
3337:walled garden
3334:
3328:
3326:
3320:
3318:
3314:
3299:
3298:
3294:
3290:
3286:
3282:
3277:
3273:
3267:
3262:
3261:
3257:
3253:
3248:
3239:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3227:
3223:
3216:
3210:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3161:
3153:
3147:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3115:
3109:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3094:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3080:
3075:
3071:
3067:
3066:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3021:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3004:
3003:bulk-reverted
3000:
2996:
2991:
2985:
2979:
2973:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2959:Woozle effect
2956:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2924:
2913:
2912:
2907:
2902:
2898:
2893:
2891:
2887:
2886:New York City
2883:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2867:
2861:
2859:
2849:
2841:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2826:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2756:comparing BHG
2752:
2748:
2733:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2719:
2715:
2710:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2695:
2692:
2688:
2685:respectively
2684:
2680:
2676:
2666:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2644:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2492:
2490:
2489:indef blocked
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2434:
2433:
2428:
2425:
2423:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2403:
2400:
2399:
2394:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2384:
2381:
2380:
2375:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2362:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2329:
2326:
2325:
2320:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2306:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2297:
2287:
2286:
2282:
2281:North America
2276:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2263:
2259:
2258:WP:POG2019RFC
2255:
2251:
2247:
2237:
2235:
2231:
2228:
2225:
2222:
2219:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2194:
2191:
2188:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2172:
2169:
2159:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2098:
2094:
2091:
2088:
2085:
2082:
2078:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2054:
2051:
2048:
2045:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2020:
2017:
2014:
2011:
2008:
2005:
2002:
2001:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1986:
1985:
1982:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1975:
1971:
1970:
1967:
1964:
1961:
1958:
1955:
1952:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1928:
1925:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1879:
1876:
1875:
1872:
1869:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1844:August 2019:
1843:
1842:
1839:
1836:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1817:
1815:
1811:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1765:
1762:
1756:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1721:August 2019:
1720:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1667:
1662:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1641:
1639:
1635:
1634:WP:ASPERSIONS
1631:
1626:
1624:
1622:
1618:
1616:
1612:
1605:
1604:WP:ASPERSIONS
1599:
1597:
1594:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1557:
1555:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1486:WP:ASPERSIONS
1484:
1483:
1481:
1480:, including:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1430:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1415:living person
1412:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1378:
1374:
1373:Portal:Canada
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1302:
1298:
1293:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1268:
1265:
1262:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1243:
1237:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:WP:ENDPORTALS
1217:
1215:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1187:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1124:
1122:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1053:walls of text
1050:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
976:
970:
961:
960:
956:
952:
948:
938:
934:
929:
925:
924:
923:
921:
916:
911:
910:
904:
901:
898:
895:
891:
887:
883:
882:
881:
880:
876:
871:
867:
864:
860:
859:WP:ENDPORTALS
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
844:
843:
841:
829:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
805:
796:
792:
791:
790:
787:
784:
781:
774:
771:
770:
769:
767:
763:
759:
758:WP:ENDPORTALS
752:
749:
748:
742:
731:
728:
727:
723:
721:
720:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
703:
702:
698:
696:
695:
685:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
661:
646:
643:
642:
641:AmericanAir88
636:
633:
629:
625:
624:WP:TOOLMISUSE
621:
618:
614:
611:
607:
604:
603:
595:
592:
591:
590:AmericanAir88
586:
582:
578:
574:
571:
567:
563:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
527:
526:
508:
503:
501:
496:
494:
489:
488:
486:
485:
480:
475:
474:
459:
458:
447:
444:
441:
437:
434:
432:
429:
428:
424:
419:
418:
410:
407:
405:
402:
399:
395:
390:
387:
385:
382:
379:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
353:
348:
345:
344:
340:
335:
334:
326:
323:
321:
318:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
298:
297:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
273:Case requests
271:
269:
266:
265:
261:
256:
255:
248:
244:
241:
239:
236:
233:
229:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:
193:
192:
188:
184:
183:
180:
177:
176:
172:
169:
164:
158:
153:
147:
142:
141:KrakatoaKatie
138:
133:
128:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
94:
89:
83:
78:
72:
67:
58:
54:
47:
44:
40:
39:
31:
27:
23:
19:
4525:
4516:
4507:
4506:
4497:
4452:
4449:User:Diannaa
4441:
4437:
4433:
4422:
4406:
4394:
4388:edit warring
4387:
4386:I enaged in
4380:
4370:
4369:I engaed in
4357:
4346:
4341:
4339:
4301:
4272:
4260:
4227:
4221:
4214:
4204:
4197:
4192:WP:OWNership
4178:
4174:
4167:
4132:
4126:
4095:
4086:
4085:
4074:
4023:
4007:
3983:
3961:
3937:
3915:
3893:
3888:
3869:
3849:
3830:
3817:
3800:
3797:
3767:
3758:
3748:
3746:
3742:
3734:
3728:
3709:
3673:18 May 2019
3658:
3637:Voceditenore
3635:
3616:
3613:
3590:
3586:
3572:
3524:Portal:Opera
3521:
3487:
3467:lying habits
3466:
3462:
3459:pile of lies
3458:
3455:pack of lies
3454:
3444:
3423:
3415:
3409:
3398:
3387:
3375:
3341:
3330:
3324:
3322:
3310:
3272:User:Bagumba
3270:
3245:
3219:
3188:
3157:
3123:
3095:
3070:Newshunter12
3068:
3052:
3048:
3036:
3032:
3027:
2999:WP:IMPERFECT
2934:
2928:
2922:
2894:
2882:Conservatism
2862:
2857:
2855:
2847:
2831:Newshunter12
2827:
2739:
2723:Newshunter12
2711:
2672:
2656:Newshunter12
2506:Portal:Ghana
2503:
2486:
2440:
2401:
2382:
2327:
2304:
2293:
2277:
2268:
2249:
2243:
2214:
2184:
2181:
2165:
2142:
2134:
2132:
2122:
2103:
2101:
2073:
1980:April 2019:
1973:
1972:
1906:
1898:
1896:
1823:
1807:
1665:
1663:
1654:
1652:
1642:
1637:
1629:
1627:
1608:
1579:
1558:
1552:
1531:
1477:
1466:
1458:
1438:10 years old
1433:
1431:
1426:
1408:
1380:
1365:Portal:Japan
1361:Portal:Opera
1354:
1351:Good portals
1331:
1321:
1289:
1247:
1223:
1214:this AN case
1210:
1191:
1170:
1130:
1119:
1057:
969:exhaustive.
967:
944:
917:
906:
902:
877:
863:two separate
854:
846:
840:FeydHuxtable
837:
813:FeydHuxtable
800:
777:
755:
739:
725:
718:
717:
711:
700:
693:
692:
687:
663:
659:
640:
617:WP:ADMINACCT
610:WP:ADMINCOND
589:
136:
111:
110:
108:
76:
57:edit request
4318:WP:TROUBLES
3739:WP:NOEFFORT
3471:Lepricavark
3166:conduct of
3164:tendentious
2972:BHG and BHG
1987:July 2019:
1828:July 2019:
1672:July 2019:
1638:many months
1491:WP:HOUNDING
1442:84.46.53.86
585:accusations
243:Ban appeals
221:Noticeboard
112:Case clerks
4475:HairedGirl
4399:WP:TWINKLE
4371:harassment
4307:NA1K says
4294:WP:GAMEing
3916:MfD ex. 2
3894:MfD ex. 1
3553:on another
3405:WP:BRD-NOT
3311:See above
2955:Statistics
2923:ad hominem
2866:Literature
2760:Alex Jones
2746:HairedGirl
2718:discussion
2651:HairedGirl
1369:Portal:Law
1312:Scottywong
1194:Tryptofish
870:this essay
857:true that
766:"inspired"
449:(pre-2016)
436:Statistics
369:Procedures
116:Guerillero
4410:Transport
4393:I was in
4137:WP:WPPORT
3925:I agreed:
3731:WP:BEFORE
3029:Barkeep49
3024:Rebuttals
3007:ownership
2823:keep vote
2269:principle
2152:WP:GAMING
2081:perm link
2069:WP:Gaming
1526:WP:GAMING
1478:ad naseum
1423:talk page
1375:. I hope
1301:pageviews
1049:bludgeons
909:syllogism
894:based his
760:– as per
628:WP:ALTREV
577:this edit
568:created.
374:Elections
127:CodeLyoko
4484:contribs
4418:Djibouti
4104:for the
4100:for the
3697:26 Sept
3691:20 July
3617:a priori
3557:this one
3350:this one
3045:describe
2931:2018 RfC
2187:subpages
1470:contribs
1326:or Moxy
1230:outlines
559:frequent
88:Workshop
77:Evidence
28: |
24: |
22:Requests
20: |
4466:WP:VAND
4462:WP:GAME
4364:asserts
4298:WP:NPOV
4198:content
4183:Hecato
3940:Bagumba
3872:Bagumba
3833:Bagumba
3781:Bagumba
3733:states
3712:Bagumba
3685:2 July
3679:2 June
2981:. The
2951:Nigeria
2925:attacks
2874:Society
2365:example
2296:3/19 AN
1899:Portals
890:opposed
632:WP:ROWN
446:Reports
384:History
364:Members
359:Contact
347:Discuss
211:(CU/OS)
30:Portals
4480:(talk)
4426:WP:ARS
4366:that:
4244:, and
4224:WP:POG
4159:WP:POG
4150:Ran a
4110:Andrew
4067:true).
3703:4 Oct
3465:, and
3401:WP:BRD
3224:, in:
3099:Certes
3084:Certes
3057:Certes
3047:it as
3011:Certes
2939:WP:POG
2933:found
2783:thread
2679:Certes
2305:Certes
2246:WP:POG
2176:, and
2156:WP:BRD
2061:WP:OWN
1810:thread
1666:sample
1425:, CSD:
1413:for a
1292:WP:POG
1272:WP:POG
1254:WP:POG
1242:WP:POG
1148:Hecato
1133:Hecato
951:ToThAc
886:WP:POG
828:ToThAc
783:attack
719:BD2412
694:BD2412
579:. The
557:are a
389:Clerks
247:Report
161:&
150:&
125:&
4473:Brown
4460:both
4414:Ghana
4266:, ],
4226:said
4147:(TTH)
3222:WP:AN
3215:WP:AN
3195:WP:AN
2764:troll
2744:Brown
2683:Kusma
2649:Brown
2510:alive
2482:11/19
2477:11/19
2472:10/19
2383:Kusma
2250:after
2143:after
1382:Kusma
1333:Kusma
786:diffs
423:Audit
163:Bradv
16:<
4464:and
4114:talk
3944:talk
3876:talk
3837:talk
3785:talk
3716:talk
3641:talk
3606:.
3595:for
3561:this
3559:and
3506:Moxy
3475:talk
3383:here
3378:here
3358:talk
3293:talk
3256:talk
3233:talk
3204:talk
3176:talk
3141:talk
3131:and
3103:talk
3088:talk
3061:talk
3051:and
3015:talk
2967:NA1K
2965:and
2953:and
2906:talk
2878:Arts
2835:talk
2727:talk
2699:here
2689:and
2681:and
2660:talk
2467:8/19
2462:4/19
2457:4/19
2452:4/19
2447:3/19
2273:here
2262:here
2254:here
2234:here
2218:here
2154:the
2148:here
2112:here
2108:here
2097:here
2067:and
1907:many
1903:here
1659:here
1611:here
1542:here
1464:talk
1446:talk
1328:here
1324:here
1198:talk
1152:talk
1137:talk
955:talk
945:See
817:talk
778:The
680:and
674:here
672:and
670:here
630:and
551:this
549:and
547:this
543:Here
539:this
535:this
531:Here
440:Talk
431:Talk
398:Talk
378:Talk
232:Talk
202:Talk
168:Talk
157:Talk
152:Mkdw
146:Talk
132:Talk
121:Talk
104:Talk
93:Talk
82:Talk
71:Talk
53:here
26:Case
4482:• (
4194:by
4112:🐉(
4102:MfD
4098:DRV
4057:BHG
3998:- "
3974:- "
3972:BHG
3392:or
3287:.
3135:.
2963:BHG
2860:"
2758:to
2701:at
2673:At
2328:BHG
2030:,
2027:,
1996:,
1993:,
1965:,
1923:,
1905:),
1847:,
1831:,
1730:,
762:TTH
712:not
314:Log
4416:,
4412:,
4379:I
4355:.
4344:.
4270:.
4233:,
4219:.
4116:)
4035:Mj
4024:."
4020:MS
3996:Mj
3946:)
3878:)
3839:)
3787:)
3737:.
3718:)
3643:)
3631:.
3628:,
3625:,
3622:,
3579:.
3576:,
3510:🍁
3477:)
3461:,
3457:,
3407:.
3360:)
3295:)
3258:)
3235:)
3206:)
3178:)
3143:)
3105:)
3090:)
3063:)
3017:)
2929:A
2888:,
2884:,
2880:,
2876:,
2872:,
2868:,
2837:)
2813:,
2809:,
2805:,
2801:,
2797:,
2793:,
2777:,
2770:,
2729:)
2662:)
2636:,
2632:,
2626:20
2624:,
2622:19
2620:,
2618:18
2616:,
2614:17
2612:,
2610:16
2608:,
2606:15
2604:,
2602:14
2600:,
2598:13
2596:,
2594:12
2592:,
2590:11
2588:,
2586:10
2584:,
2580:,
2576:,
2572:,
2568:,
2564:,
2560:,
2556:,
2552:,
2540:,
2536:,
2532:,
2528:,
2524:,
2520:,
2516:,
2278:–
2236:.
2223:,
2198:,
2195:,
2192:,
2179:.
2173:,
2127:,
2120:.
2117:,
2089:,
2086:,
2063:,
2052:,
2049:,
2046:,
2036:,
2033:,
2024:,
2021:,
2018:,
2015:,
2012:,
2009:,
2006:,
1990:,
1968:,
1962:,
1959:,
1956:,
1953:,
1950:,
1947:,
1944:,
1941:,
1938:,
1935:,
1932:,
1929:,
1926:,
1920:,
1918:,
1915:,
1912:,
1886:,
1883:,
1880:,
1856:,
1853:,
1850:,
1837:,
1834:,
1816:.
1812:.
1802:,
1799:,
1796:,
1779:,
1776:,
1770:,
1760:,
1754:,
1751:,
1748:,
1745:,
1742:,
1739:,
1736:,
1733:,
1727:,
1724:,
1714:,
1711:,
1708:,
1705:,
1702:,
1699:,
1696:,
1693:,
1690:,
1687:,
1684:,
1681:,
1678:,
1675:,
1650:.
1647:,
1640:.
1598:.
1595:,
1592:,
1589:,
1574:,
1571:,
1568:,
1565:,
1562:,
1556:.
1448:)
1427:R2
1393:)
1371:,
1367:,
1363:,
1359:,
1344:)
1266:,
1263:,
1200:)
1192:--
1178:,
1154:)
1139:)
1131:--
957:)
872:).
855:is
842::
819:)
553:.
541:.
139::
114::
97:—
86:—
75:—
4486:)
4401:.
4255:)
4163:]
4005:Y
3981:N
3942:(
3938:—
3874:(
3870:—
3835:(
3831:—
3783:(
3779:—
3776:.
3714:(
3710:—
3639:(
3473:(
3451:Ɱ
3426:C
3422:·
3418:T
3356:(
3291:(
3254:(
3231:(
3202:(
3174:(
3139:(
3101:(
3086:(
3059:(
3013:(
2908:)
2904:(
2833:(
2815:8
2811:7
2807:6
2803:5
2799:4
2795:3
2791:2
2789:,
2787:1
2779:4
2775:3
2772:2
2768:1
2740:@
2725:(
2694:3
2691:2
2687:1
2658:(
2638:3
2634:2
2630:1
2582:9
2578:8
2574:7
2570:6
2566:5
2562:4
2558:3
2554:2
2550:1
2542:8
2538:7
2534:6
2530:5
2526:4
2522:3
2518:2
2514:1
2367:)
2357:.
2260:(
2079:(
1544:.
1467:·
1462:(
1444:(
1391:c
1389:·
1387:t
1385:(
1342:c
1340:·
1338:t
1336:(
1196:(
1150:(
1135:(
953:(
922:.
815:(
797:.
780:3
726:T
701:T
634:.
506:e
499:t
492:v
394:+
352:+
316:)
312:(
228:+
170:)
166:(
159:)
155:(
148:)
144:(
134:)
130:(
123:)
119:(
106:)
102:(
95:)
91:(
84:)
80:(
73:)
69:(
59:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.