857:. Choose any article and examine it to see why an editor has tagged it; you may have to check the article history or the Discussion page to find out. If the tag is dated, look at the history of that month and the month preceding it. Improve the article by deleting the recentism or adding information that brings the piece into chronological balance (this may take a while because you have to find reputable sources). You might have to add an "Expert Needed" tag and move on. (For information, see
822:
65:
166:
492:. When dealing with contemporary subjects, editors should consider whether they are simply regurgitating media coverage of an issue or actually adding well-sourced information that will remain notable over time. Yes, unneeded content can be eliminated later, but a cluttered "first draft" of an article may degrade its eventual quality and a coherent orientation may not always be attained.
151:
540:, which was developed day by day as the trial and appeals process advanced. Eventually, when the process ended, later editors could place everything in perspective—while also retaining the chronological coverage as an exhaustive historical record. (As of June 2024 this article is still marked as "Cleanup Needed", showing that the editing procedure is never really ended.)
732:? Many articles can be condensed to keep only the most important information, the wider notable effects of an event, and links to related issues. Much of the timeline and the day-to-day updates collected in the "rough draft" stages can safely be excised. A number of the citations to breaking news reports written at the time of the event (especially those later
533:; new Knowledge articles are immediately published in what might be considered draft form: They can be—and are—improved in real time; these rapidly developing drafts may appear to be a clutter of news links and half-developed thoughts, but later, as the big picture emerges, the least relevant content ought to be—and often is—eliminated.
543:
Collaborative editing on
Knowledge has resulted in a massive encyclopedia of comprehensive and well-balanced articles on the many current events of the twenty-first century. This record will be valuable to those in the future who seek to understand the history of this time period. In other words: "If
283:
Over-use of recent material does not by itself mean that an article should be deleted, but the quick and contemporaneous passage of events may make any subject difficult to judge as actually notable enough for a permanent encyclopedia entry. Proper perspective requires maturity, judgment, and the
381:
This tendency towards article imbalance is enhanced by the availability of reliable sources, which is not uniform across different topics. This manifests both from the language a source is written in and the ease with which it can be accessed. Sources published in a medium that is both widely
365:
Subjects with a long history might be described in purely modern terms, even though they were actually more significant in the past than they are today. Even when the topics remain significant, articles can cover the subject as if the most recent events were the salient, defining traits. For
778:
This is especially true during a news spike, when there is mass interest to create and update articles on a current event, regardless of whether it may be historically significant later on. Also, editors updating an article affected by a current event may not necessarily be the same ones
547:
One of
Knowledge's strengths is the collation and sifting through of vast amounts of reporting on current events, producing encyclopedia-quality articles in real time about ongoing events or developing stories: natural disasters, political campaigns and elections, wars, product releases,
421:
Thus, a political candidate's biography might become bloated with specific details related to a particular, recent election. Long passages in an athlete's or an actor's biography might be devoted to detailed coverage of a recent controversy. With celebrities, an article about a
189:
Articles deleted despite concerning notable trans-historical subject matter, because a recentist article has given only flimsy and transient details available in news reports without the accompanying historical perspective, and because editors proposing deletion don't bother to
315:
A news spike is a sudden mass interest in any current event, whereupon
Wikipedians create and update articles on it, even if some readers later feel that the topic was not historically significant in any way. The result might be a well-written and well-documented
555:. But by documenting timely material with reliable sources at the outset, more permanent sources will hopefully be found and used later - and, with the original online sources linked from Knowledge, they are much more likely to be picked up and archived by the
736:) could be replaced by those to more scholarly, historical, or retrospective references created later on. Any detailed subarticle relating to the event may also be either merged back into the main article, or deleted (this includes any article about a subject
226:
Impassioned discussions on talk pages that debate not just the notability of the recent event ("Is this topic of lasting importance?") but also where (if anywhere) it should receive coverage on
Knowledge. Often conducted in ignorance of the historical
594:
What might seem at the time to be an excessive amount of information on recent topics actually serves the purpose of drawing in new readers—and among them, potential new
Wikipedians. Example: Knowledge received positive coverage on the American
801:
at the top of articles to warn the reader that the content may be tilted toward recent perspectives. (Tagging is a subject of debate: Some think tags on articles make them ugly or caution readers that a tagged article is defective.)
724:
for a single incident or event is not necessarily an appropriate topic for a standalone biographical article, if their notability claim is not likely to still be of sustained public interest in the next few decades.
159:
Some
Knowledge articles tend to focus on recent events. Knowledge has been praised for the way it deals with current news breaks. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to be aware of balance and historical perspective.
235:
process, and has positive aspects as well – up-to-date information on breaking news events, vetted and counter-vetted by enthusiastic volunteer editors, is something that no other encyclopedia can offer. Still,
625:
outlook into how the state and federal governments in the United States interact constitutionally, some insight into motivations for politicians to intervene in court cases, and nuances of end-of-life issues.
382:
available and familiar to editors, such as a news website, are more likely to be used than those from esoteric or foreign-language publications regardless of their reliability. For example, a 2010 story on
175:
is a phenomenon on
Knowledge where an article has an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events. It is writing without an aim toward a long-term, historical view. This can result in, among others:
486:
Recentism in one sense—established articles that are bloated with event-specific facts at the expense of longstanding content—is considered a
Knowledge fault, as discussed above under News Spikes.
450:
changed rapidly and substantially during
October 2012, with over 700Â edits to the article in that month alone compared to 85 for the rest of the year to that point. Eventually, a breakout article,
470:
debate. (Deletionists tend to view
Knowledge as a traditional, rigorous encyclopedia. Inclusionists tend to see it as a compendium of all knowledge, with broader remit.) Many editors identify as
495:
The second sense of recentism—the creation of a glut of new articles on a recent event—can result in a slap-dash approach to the subject and a rambling, disorganized look to the encyclopedia.
617:
The related articles that are written during a "recentist news frenzy" provide an in-depth look for interested readers. For example, the Terri Schiavo piece and its companion articles at
272:
into multiple articles in order to achieve a balance not readily attainable within a single article. Sometimes in-depth information on current events is more appropriately added to
260:
Allegations of recentism should prompt consideration of proportion, balance, and due weight. Material may need to be moved, deleted, or expanded. Certain articles might be
689:
Will someone ten or twenty years from now be confused about how this article is written? In ten or twenty years will this addition still appear relevant? If I am devoting
1281:
352:
709:
article might seem logical. Nevertheless, in the future, when neither event is fresh, readers will benefit from a similar level of detail in both articles.
446:
justification behind the creation of their article in the first place. For example, Knowledge's article on English disk jockey and television presenter
854:
331:
An event that occurs in a certain geographic region might come to dominate an entire article about that region. For example, in the aftermath of
325:
567:
Search engines drive a large amount of traffic to Knowledge's articles about what were at the moment recent events—for example, the death of
378:, the stress might be on simply the last few centuries, though the subject matter of the article might have a history of thousands of years.
310:
779:
participating months (or even years) later in the clean-up and maintenance of the page. Above all else, editors should avoid getting into
208:
1325:
1320:
340:
73:
1014:
706:
702:
1287:
983:
893:
204:
1305:
1174:
850:
Of course this tag, like many others, should be employed only if editors cannot immediately rectify the problems themselves.
537:
1310:
306:
1140:
728:
After "recentist" articles have calmed down and the number of edits per day has dropped to a minimum, why not initiate
588:
430:
who became famous decades ago for achievements on stage may focus almost exclusively on recent news reports of alleged
1145:
629:
1199:
529:
In many cases, such content is a valuable preliminary stage in presenting information. Any encyclopedia goes through
451:
94:
786:
356:
17:
360:
961:
920:
717:
265:
245:
85:
77:
35:
93:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
949:
767:
716:, particularly the "Presumed" criterion. Content that seemed notable at the time might, in retrospect, violate
248:, with attention to the long-term significance of the information included, and with awareness that, under the
612:
506:
481:
1128:
1099:
478:, or some other more nuanced position, and they may have their own thoughts on dealing with recent material.
98:
193:
The muddling or diffusion of the timeless facets of a subject, previously recognized by Knowledge consensus.
1212:, proseline is the tendency to choppy writing, often containing dates, that ends up looking like a timeline
1116:
1104:
1087:
572:
618:
606:
277:
1152:
1315:
1043:
1009:
1026:
976:
876:
200:
1215:
932:
339:
article was inundated with day-by-day facts about the hurricane. The solution: an article on the
462:
Any disagreement over whether to remove an article might also be related to Knowledge's ongoing
937:
861:.) Sometimes you won't agree with the assessment, and you can simply remove the Recentism tag.
780:
196:
664:
650:
1157:
1121:
966:
886:
839:
596:
123:
39:
774:
later on. Editors writing today do not have a historical perspective on today's events, and
402:. Similarly, the cost of access to a source can be a barrier; for example, most research in
1162:
1080:
1065:
733:
544:
we don't make sense of it today, someone else will struggle to make sense of it tomorrow."
220:
180:
130:
81:
54:
562:
116:
8:
1205:
1167:
1092:
1075:
903:
858:
269:
31:
1076:§ Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time
657:
643:
398:
1220:
898:
881:
795:
737:
635:
108:
1184:
1058:
1019:
971:
775:
682:
580:
551:
Finally, Knowledge articles are often developed via on-line references, which may be
489:
439:
346:
332:
321:
261:
237:
457:
1253:
1179:
1031:
925:
712:
Furthermore, detailed stand-alone articles and lists may no longer comply with the
212:
463:
1133:
1036:
1004:
908:
721:
556:
496:
241:
467:
255:
1232:
954:
942:
317:
216:
475:
1299:
1109:
1070:
988:
913:
771:
713:
568:
500:
249:
757:
681:
as a thought experiment that might be helpful, but keep in mind the policy
601:
584:
447:
522:
443:
353:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons § Avoid gossip and feedback loops
336:
300:
47:
783:
or contentious deletion discussions when trying to deal with recentism.
471:
997:
622:
591:, and newsy articles like those from other English-speaking countries.
513:
435:
423:
415:
1275:
1020:§ Article spinoffs: "Summary style" meta-articles and summary sections
530:
328:). Still, these articles are valuable for future historical research.
320:
article on a topic that might hardly be remembered a month later (see
403:
392:
43:
1226:
1202:– essay discussing how to prevent content from degrading over time
869:
746:
720:
and other guidelines. Similarly, a person who receives a temporary
552:
411:
387:
371:
273:
853:
You can find a list of articles that have been tagged by going to
1048:
576:
431:
367:
232:
1284:(includes graphs of years by number of references in Knowledge)
1282:
The Four Eras Of Knowledge And Visualizing History Without Maps
1193:
1053:
838:
Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and
1251:
1238:
977:§ Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information
390:
website is more likely to be cited than a 1970 edition of the
427:
407:
693:
time to it than other topics in the article, will it appear
497:
Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information
231:
Recentism is a symptom of Knowledge's dynamic and immediate
165:
287:
864:
343:
was created to collect this quickly accumulating content.
295:
252:, not every topic will merit its own stand-alone article.
1290:
Coverage Rapid, And Often Wrong, In Tragedy's Early Hours
1110:§ Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films
418:
are available only through costly subscription services.
383:
375:
311:
Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources § Breaking news
1245:
559:
or other similar web archives before they disappear.
199:
over whether to change an article's well-established
42:. For guidelines on using "recent" in articles, see
1254:"GET ME REWRITE: Transcript, Friday, July 08, 2005"
30:"WP:RECENT" redirects here. You may be looking for
967:§ Knowledge is not a soapbox or means of promotion
701:For example, in 2020, devoting more space to the
1297:
1252:Gladstone, Brooke; Garfield, Bob (8 July 2005).
855:Category:Articles slanted towards recent events
583:and election of a successor, the nomination of
242:not an indiscriminate collection of information
219:or article body on the basis of those used on
307:Knowledge:Notability (events) § Breaking news
186:Articles created on flimsy, transient merits.
943:§ Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion
357:Knowledge:Verifiability § Access to sources
776:should not pretend to have a crystal ball.
361:Knowledge:Systemic bias § External factors
341:Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans
955:§ Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
756:project was founded to provide in-depth "
1146:§ Not yet or newly published periodicals
707:2000 United States presidential election
703:2020 United States presidential election
501:Knowledge's general notability guideline
288:§ Suggestions for dealing with recentism
268:list. Conversely, an article might need
984:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a dictionary
894:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons
179:Articles overburdened with documenting
14:
1298:
791:Some editors employ the Recentism tag
630:Suggestions for dealing with recentism
503:to merit its own stand-alone article.
406:is freely available to the public via
1175:Knowledge:Reliable sources (medicine)
909:§ Subjects notable only for one event
538:Pitcairn sexual assault trial of 2004
1081:§ Whether to create standalone pages
1037:§ Naming the specific topic articles
815:
697:relevant than what is already here?
244:. Articles should be written from a
145:
59:
1134:§ People notable for only one event
760:"-like coverage of current events.
516:is a first rough draft of history.
24:
1141:Knowledge:Notability (periodicals)
613:Recentist articles as case studies
589:Supreme Court of the United States
164:
99:thoroughly vetted by the community
95:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
1337:
1326:Knowledge essays about neutrality
1321:Knowledge essays about notability
1200:Knowledge:Build content to endure
904:§ Avoid gossip and feedback loops
452:Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal
914:§ Recently dead or probably dead
820:
605:about its quick response to the
215:and spelling, or wording in the
149:
63:
1015:§ Unacceptable types of forking
962:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
921:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
738:only notable for that one event
266:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
86:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
78:Knowledge:Neutral point of view
36:Knowledge:Recent changes patrol
1071:§ General notability guideline
972:§ Knowledge is not a newspaper
950:Knowledge:No original research
882:§ Deciding on an article title
183:and controversy as it happens.
13:
1:
1129:Knowledge:Notability (people)
1100:Knowledge:Notability (events)
842:related to non-recent events.
833:slanted towards recent events
326:the article's deletion debate
1306:Knowledge supplemental pages
1117:Knowledge:Notability (music)
1105:Knowledge:Notability (films)
1088:Knowledge:Notability (books)
714:general notability guideline
607:London bombings of July 2005
573:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
499:, and not every topic meets
490:Knowledge is not a newspaper
366:large-scale topics, such as
250:general notability guideline
238:Knowledge is not a newspaper
7:
1311:Knowledge content selection
1180:§ Respect secondary sources
1049:§ Retaining existing styles
1032:§ Is there a primary topic?
619:Category:Terri Schiavo case
285:
213:national variety of English
10:
1342:
1153:Knowledge:Reliable sources
859:Knowledge:TC#Expert_needed
633:
442:use—none of which are the
350:
304:
106:
52:
29:
1185:§ Use up-to-date evidence
1093:§ Not-yet-published books
1044:Knowledge:Manual of Style
1010:Knowledge:Content forking
806:The tag looks like this:
209:date and numbering format
1027:Knowledge:Disambiguation
877:Knowledge:Article titles
563:Recentism as recruitment
157:This page in a nutshell:
53:Not to be confused with
1216:Knowledge:Systemic bias
933:Knowledge:Verifiability
507:Recentism as a positive
482:Recentism as a negative
814:
752:Unlike Knowledge, the
734:found to be inaccurate
730:comprehensive rewrites
699:
518:
169:
27:Wikimedia project page
1122:§ Unreleased material
804:
722:blip of news coverage
718:what Knowledge is not
687:
597:National Public Radio
511:
458:Debate over recentism
318:neutral-point-of-view
276:, which can be found
246:neutral point of view
221:breaking news sources
181:breaking news reports
168:
40:Special:RecentChanges
1066:Knowledge:Notability
812:and results in this:
772:consensus can change
768:there is no deadline
705:article than to the
82:Knowledge:Notability
1206:Knowledge:Proseline
926:§ Balancing aspects
553:temporary in nature
536:One example is the
256:What to do about it
97:as it has not been
32:Help:Recent changes
1221:Knowledge:Too soon
764:Just wait and see.
170:
1288:NPR audio/text -
1208:– the nephew of
848:
847:
787:The Recentism tag
581:Pope John Paul II
440:recreational drug
347:Article imbalance
333:Hurricane Katrina
322:Jennifer Wilbanks
264:or placed on the
163:
162:
143:Explanatory essay
141:
140:
74:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
1333:
1316:Knowledge essays
1269:
1268:
1266:
1264:
1249:
843:
840:add more content
824:
823:
816:
811:
810:
800:
794:
679:twenty-year test
667:
660:
653:
646:
548:assassinations.
525:
399:VeÄŤernje novosti
291:
284:passage of time
153:
152:
146:
133:
126:
119:
67:
66:
60:
21:
18:Knowledge:RECENT
1341:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1296:
1295:
1278:
1273:
1272:
1262:
1260:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1229:
1196:
1191:
1163:§ Breaking news
1005:Knowledge:As of
1000:
995:
938:§ Accessibility
899:§ Writing style
872:
867:
844:
837:
825:
821:
808:
807:
798:
792:
789:
671:
670:
663:
656:
649:
642:
638:
632:
615:
579:, the death of
575:and subsequent
565:
557:Wayback Machine
527:
520:
509:
484:
460:
363:
349:
313:
303:
298:
258:
150:
144:
137:
136:
129:
122:
115:
111:
103:
102:
64:
58:
51:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1339:
1329:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1294:
1293:
1285:
1277:
1276:External links
1274:
1271:
1270:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1233:Exceptionalism
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1203:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1182:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1102:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1017:
1007:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
993:
992:
991:
981:
980:
979:
974:
969:
959:
958:
957:
947:
946:
945:
940:
930:
929:
928:
918:
917:
916:
911:
906:
901:
891:
890:
889:
887:§ Name changes
884:
873:
871:
868:
866:
863:
846:
845:
831:appears to be
828:
826:
819:
788:
785:
669:
668:
661:
654:
647:
639:
634:
631:
628:
614:
611:
564:
561:
510:
508:
505:
483:
480:
459:
456:
454:was required.
348:
345:
302:
299:
297:
294:
257:
254:
229:
228:
224:
194:
191:
187:
184:
161:
160:
154:
142:
139:
138:
135:
134:
127:
120:
112:
107:
104:
92:
91:
70:
68:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1338:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1303:
1301:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1259:
1255:
1248:
1244:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1197:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1158:§ Age matters
1156:
1155:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1002:
990:
987:
986:
985:
982:
978:
975:
973:
970:
968:
965:
964:
963:
960:
956:
953:
952:
951:
948:
944:
941:
939:
936:
935:
934:
931:
927:
924:
923:
922:
919:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
896:
895:
892:
888:
885:
883:
880:
879:
878:
875:
874:
862:
860:
856:
851:
841:
836:
834:
829:This article
827:
818:
817:
813:
809:{{Recentism}}
803:
797:
784:
782:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
759:
755:
751:
749:
748:
741:
739:
735:
731:
726:
723:
719:
715:
710:
708:
704:
698:
696:
692:
686:
684:
680:
676:
675:ten-year test
673:Consider the
666:
665:WP:20YEARTEST
662:
659:
655:
652:
651:WP:10YEARTEST
648:
645:
641:
640:
637:
627:
624:
620:
610:
608:
604:
603:
598:
592:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:Ronald Reagan
560:
558:
554:
549:
545:
541:
539:
534:
532:
526:
524:
517:
515:
504:
502:
498:
493:
491:
487:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
455:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
419:
417:
414:, while many
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
395:
394:
389:
385:
379:
377:
373:
369:
362:
358:
354:
344:
342:
338:
334:
329:
327:
323:
319:
312:
308:
293:
289:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
177:
176:
174:
167:
158:
155:
148:
147:
132:
128:
125:
121:
118:
114:
113:
110:
105:
100:
96:
89:
87:
83:
79:
75:
69:
62:
61:
56:
55:WP:Presentism
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1289:
1261:. Retrieved
1258:On The Media
1257:
1247:
1209:
989:§ Neologisms
852:
849:
832:
830:
805:
790:
763:
762:
758:news article
753:
745:
743:
742:
729:
727:
711:
700:
694:
690:
688:
678:
674:
672:
616:
602:On the Media
600:
593:
585:John Roberts
566:
550:
546:
542:
535:
531:rough drafts
528:
519:
512:
494:
488:
485:
464:inclusionism
461:
448:Jimmy Savile
420:
416:law journals
397:
391:
380:
364:
330:
314:
282:
259:
230:
217:lead section
205:abbreviation
197:Edit warring
172:
171:
156:
124:WP:RECENTISM
71:
1168:§ Headlines
523:Phil Graham
476:separatists
468:deletionism
337:New Orleans
301:News spikes
270:to be split
72:This is an
48:MOS:RELTIME
1300:Categories
1239:References
1054:§ Identity
998:Guidelines
683:WP:CRYSTAL
623:case-study
621:provide a
514:Journalism
444:Notability
436:infidelity
426:singer or
424:rock music
351:See also:
305:See also:
286:(see also
240:and it is
131:WP:RECENCY
76:about the
1210:recentism
1059:§ Current
796:Recentism
781:edit wars
766:Remember
636:Shortcuts
404:astronomy
393:Thai Post
233:editorial
190:research.
173:Recentism
117:WP:RECENT
109:Shortcuts
44:MOS:DATED
1227:Articles
870:Policies
865:See also
754:Wikinews
747:Wikinews
599:program
472:mergists
466:-versus-
432:scandals
412:NASA ADS
388:BBC News
372:marriage
296:Examples
290:, below)
274:Wikinews
88:policies
1263:19 July
658:WP:20YT
644:WP:10YT
587:to the
577:tsunami
368:slavery
1194:Essays
770:, and
571:, the
359:, and
335:, the
309:, and
262:merged
227:facts.
84:, and
438:, or
428:actor
408:arXiv
374:, or
201:title
38:, or
1265:2016
744:Use
695:more
691:more
324:and
278:here
46:and
740:).
677:or
410:or
396:or
386:or
384:CNN
376:war
1302::
1256:.
799:}}
793:{{
685::
609:.
474:,
434:,
370:,
355:,
292:.
280:.
211:,
207:,
203:,
90:.
80:,
34:,
1267:.
835:.
750:.
521:—
223:.
101:.
57:.
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
