662:" that says only "Corruption rates in Wales are among the lowest in the world", with the sole purpose of turning the red link to blue. Editors should create stubs with a usable amount of content, or else not create the stub at all. Red links serve the purpose of notifying readers that a need exists in Knowledge for the creation of a new article with at least minimal information content; the creation of minimalist marker stubs simply to get rid of a red link destroys this useful mechanism.
188:). But please do not "kill" red links by redirect because their red color (annoying to some readers) seems to scream for a fix. It is easy to turn any red link blue by creating a redirect, but valid red links exist for a reason, and they are the "buds" from which new Knowledge articles grow. A valid red link should be left in place if the reader agrees on need for a future article with that best name, but does not want to provide one.
192:
Red links should not be made to articles deleted because the topic was judged unencyclopedic or lacking notability. Red links may sometimes be created to articles deleted for some other reason. In addition, even if a page has been deleted because it does not meet
Knowledge's guidelines, you may make a red link to the term if you intend to write an article about an entirely different topic that happens to have the same title.
38:
110:
612:
pages should be limited. The whole point of a disambiguation page is to help the reader arrive at the correct existing article from a choice of articles with similar titles. Since a red link is a link to a non-existent article, using red links in disambiguation pages is usually discouraged. Red links
547:
is particularly important when creating new biography articles with article names that may not be unique. If some article has a redlink to that name but meaning a different person, the link will become blue but incorrect. This does happen in reality: for example, in 2012 a red link was placed in the
234:
the content of the article in which the red link will appear. An easy example is a technical term that merits a treatment beyond its dictionary definition, to help support its role for its existing context. A technical term could qualify because it is probably "notable" and should have that obvious
191:
Articles should not contain red links to files, to templates, or to topics that do not warrant an article, such as a celebrity's romantic interest who is not notable in their own right. Red links should not routinely be made to every chapter in a book, or to all the people mentioned in an article.
179:
In general, a red link should remain in an article if there is a reasonable expectation that the article in question will eventually be created (either as its own article or as a redirect); remove red links if and only if
Knowledge should not have any coverage on the subject. It may be possible to
689:
upon creation). At any time, a
Wikipedian may independently write an article on the linked-to subject, and when this happens, there's already a link ready and waiting for it. The red link also gives readers the opportunity to click on it to create the needed article on the
791:
Lists of "notable people" in an article, such as the "Notable alumni" section in an article on a university, tend to accrue red links, listing people of unverifiable notability. Such red links should be removed only if it's certain the subject
467:
which also contain links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or the links may be removed from the template.
649:
A red link to an article that will plausibly be created in the future should be "left alone rather than being created as a minimal stub article that has no useful information." An example of a plausible red link might be to
242:. The topic may well be covered in a section of another article; it could even be buried in several paragraphs nearby. So it is the responsibility of the person who creates a red link to scan for the topic's coverage. The
645:
In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing candidate article, or article section, under any name.
700:
Some WikiProjects have bots that determine how many times a certain red link appears in
Knowledge. This is used to determine what articles are the most needed. Editors can also, after clicking on a red link, use the
713:
The link may have been made by someone who wasn't aware of what should and shouldn't be linked to within articles. Always evaluate whether or not a red link is pointing at a title that actually needs creation. See
118:
Red links are for subjects that should have articles but do not. They are not only acceptable, but needed in articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it.
669:
should not be dealt with by removing the link brackets, simply to temporarily reduce the amount of red text in an article. However, red links to articles that have since been deleted should usually be unlinked.
677:
A new article is needed. When a
Wikipedian writes an article, it is common practice to link key topics pertinent to an understanding of the subject, even if those topics don't have an article on Knowledge yet.
533:. Redlinking names of people who are not obviously notable also creates a link that may be unlikely to ever become blue. Adding detail to the link makes a misdirected link less likely (but not impossible);
788:
notes, as well as in "See also" sections, are meant to serve a navigational purpose. Red links are useless in these contexts; if possible they should be replaced by a functioning link, or else be removed.
524:
Redlinking a name which may not be unique bears the risk of the link eventually pointing to an article added later for a different person, company, or place with the same name. This is unlikely for, say,
710:
The link is broken and no longer leads to an article (perhaps because the underlying article was deleted). In such a case, the link usually needs to be removed or renamed to point to an existing article.
806:
The subject of the red link may be covered on another edition of
Knowledge. If such an article meets the English-language Knowledge criteria and you are able to translate, then follow the procedures at
613:
can be used in disambiguation pages if existing encyclopedic articles (i.e. not disambiguation pages, because disambiguation pages are not considered encyclopedic) have such red links.
311:
to find any red links that your new article turned blue, (b) check whether those links refer to the topic of your new article, and (c) change any links that refer to a different topic.
886:
231:
658:
exists, and country-specific articles on corruption are a likely area for future creation. However, it is better to leave this link red than to create a "placeholder
572:. It might have been preferable to unlink the name; the writer may not be Knowledge-notable, and even ] is not guaranteed unique; in this particular case there is
569:
996:
666:
651:
913:
858:
314:
726:
603:
1020:
832:
150:
715:
640:
1008:
160:
Add red links to articles to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is
918:
800:
923:
173:
881:
1044:
1039:
734:
541:. Simply redlinking names of people in an article, without detail, particularly if not obviously notable, should be avoided.
45:
385:
369:
729:". In this case, try to figure out the intended article and fix the link. If it looks like a common misspelling, such as
526:
172:
from the start. Good red links help
Knowledge—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that
902:
891:
154:
534:
358:
that are unlikely to be created and retained on
Knowledge, including articles that do not comply with Knowledge's
204:
are placed around a word or phrase for which
Knowledge does not have an article, disambiguation page or redirect.
812:
565:
935:
655:
153:, signifies that the linked-to page does not exist—it either never existed, or previously existed but has been
815:
instead of or next to a red link. Such links can be made manually or by using the interlanguage link template
705:" function (although the article does not exist) to determine how many times the subject has been red-linked.
509:
478:
207:
946:
835:
until the name is added to
English Knowledge (as of August 2024 there is a German, but no English article);
737:
to the correct one, but you should still correct the misspelling even though it would no longer appear red.
579:
359:
254:
features crafted to find information on Knowledge. They can help us build Knowledge, red link by red link.
135:
Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system.
992:
Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system.
976:
Diomidis Spinellis and Panagiotis Louridas (August 2008). "The collaborative organization of knowledge".
616:
873:
556:
to link to a future article about the book's author, ]. In 2014 an article was created for a different
250:
for advanced queries that can pinpoint matching text anywhere on Knowledge. Both search methods employ
53:
978:
298:
246:
links at the bottom of that page will link to virtually all related articles, and the search engine
1049:
609:
519:
258:
23:
897:
544:
291:
165:
61:
378:
that do not exist. Templates should only be added to a page if and after they have been created.
247:
508:
As with other topics, red links can be created to biographies of people who would likely meet
499:
238:
Before adding a red link, make sure that its subject does not already exist under a different
952:
808:
372:, or the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that already exists.
92:
702:
630:
435:
308:
262:
161:
85:
593:
492:
335:
221:
8:
941:
342:
328:
168:. Red links help Knowledge grow. The creation of red links prevents new pages from being
844:
560:, a rocket scientist, without checking for existing incoming links. The red link in the
929:
751:
694:
622:
585:
484:
451:
320:
283:
213:
78:
70:
57:
19:
355:
27:
685:
From within an article, such a link prepares the article to be fully supported (not
983:
783:
775:
767:
722:
686:
464:
423:
415:
407:
185:
169:
697:
to another article, but only if that article comprehensively deals with the topic.
573:
907:
381:
243:
743:
659:
443:
431:
274:
239:
564:
article thus became blue, but the link was to the wrong person. The error was
550:
195:
1033:
759:
530:
513:
399:
375:
365:
270:
266:
230:
Create red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would
987:
818:
975:
730:
557:
392:
Because they are useless as navigation aids, do not create red links in:
673:
An existing red link can indicate one or more of the following things:
538:
472:
251:
140:
Spinellis and Louridas, "The Collaborative Organization of Knowledge"
910:– including instructions to change the color, if you don't like red
384:
that do not exist. Such red links are categorized for cleanup at
959:
184:
where the subject is covered as part of a broader topic (see
428:, which are intended to direct readers to existing articles.
721:
The red link may be a typo—e.g., someone wanted to link to
576:, though without a Knowledge article as of September 2024.
887:
Knowledge:Only make links that are relevant to the context
864:
716:
WP:Manual of Style/Linking#What generally should be linked
604:
Knowledge:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages § Red links
56:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
854:{{ill|Hooglede town hall|nl|Gemeentehuis van Hooglede}}
813:
a link to the article in the other edition of Knowledge
914:
Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2008-08-11/Growth study
265:
guidelines for topics (including those for people (
200:A red link appears whenever double square brackets
257:Take care when creating a red link that it has a
1031:
641:Knowledge:Creation of example red links as pages
568:, by renaming the link, which remained red, to
180:turn the red link into a redirect to an article
850:If the English and foreign names are different:
315:Avoiding creation of certain types of red links
186:Notability – Whether to create standalone pages
997:WP:Inflationary hypothesis of Knowledge growth
26:. For the RedWarn counter-vandalism tool, see
919:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2014-08-13/Op-ed
693:The red link may identify a need to create a
18:"WP:RED" redirects here. For redirects, see
971:
969:
52:Editors should generally follow it, though
924:Knowledge:Knowledge is a work in progress
44:This page documents an English Knowledge
1009:WP:Knowledge Signpost/2009-01-31/Orphans
966:
882:Knowledge:WikiProject Red Link Recovery
368:that do not exist. Either the category
1032:
529:, but very likely for football player
665:Likewise, a valid red link term like
574:at least one more writer of that name
510:Knowledge's guidelines for notability
471:Red links are not to be shown on the
955:– red-linked lists focusing on women
843:links to the existing English page:
796:qualify for an article on Knowledge.
386:Category:Articles with missing files
104:
32:
1019:For past examples listed here, see
527:Thomas Howard, 14th Earl of Arundel
516:equally apply to red-linked names.
307:After creating an article, (a) use
13:
123:if you are certain that Knowledge
60:. When in doubt, discuss first on
14:
1061:
903:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Linking
892:Knowledge:Write the article first
801:Red links and interlanguage links
1021:/History of the example red link
535:John Alexander Smith (physician)
514:our biographies on living people
127:have an article on that subject.
108:
36:
682:This has several applications:
617:Dealing with existing red links
1013:
1002:
936:Knowledge:Most-wanted articles
735:redirect from that misspelling
680:Do not remove these red links.
656:Corruption in Northern Ireland
512:. All the rules that apply to
174:Knowledge is far from finished
22:. For the Reference desk, see
1:
1045:WikiProject Red Link Recovery
982:. Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 68–73.
1040:Knowledge editing guidelines
947:Knowledge:Requested articles
740:Links in any of the various
351:Do not create red links to:
7:
840:{{ill|Hanning Schröder|de}}
828:{{ill|Richard J. Youle|de}}
733:, you may want to create a
261:and that its subject meets
10:
1066:
938:– most red-linked articles
638:
620:
601:
583:
482:
318:
281:
211:
68:
62:this guideline's talk page
17:
979:Communications of the ACM
463:Red links may be used in
566:not corrected until 2016
479:To biographical articles
232:help a reader understand
208:When to create red links
116:This page in a nutshell:
24:Knowledge:Reference desk
988:10.1145/1378704.1378720
898:Help:Your first article
580:In disambiguation pages
548:article about the book
545:Checking incoming links
654:, since an article on
137:
953:Knowledge:WIR/REDLIST
949:– red-linked articles
725:, but instead typed "
133:
121:Only remove red links
608:Use of red links on
570:Tom Mueller (writer)
942:Special:WantedPages
667:Corruption in Wales
652:Corruption in Wales
299:WP:CHECKAFTERCREATE
930:Lists of red links
859:Hooglede town hall
396:Templates such as
360:naming conventions
196:Creating red links
20:Knowledge:Redirect
874:Cleanup red links
727:African eelephant
370:should be created
248:provides features
151:like this example
131:
130:
103:
102:
46:editing guideline
1057:
1024:
1017:
1011:
1006:
1000:
994:
973:
878:
872:
856:
855:
845:Hanning Schröder
842:
841:
833:Richard J. Youle
830:
829:
822:
787:
779:
771:
763:
755:
747:
723:African elephant
633:
596:
555:
520:Non-unique names
502:
495:
455:
447:
427:
419:
411:
403:
345:
338:
331:
301:
294:
292:WP:INCOMINGLINKS
269:), web content (
224:
203:
141:
112:
111:
105:
95:
88:
81:
40:
39:
33:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:Knowledge links
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1018:
1014:
1007:
1003:
974:
967:
962:
932:
908:Help:Link color
876:
870:
867:
853:
852:
839:
838:
827:
826:
816:
803:
781:
773:
765:
757:
749:
741:
703:what links here
643:
637:
636:
629:
625:
619:
606:
600:
599:
592:
588:
582:
562:Extra Virginity
552:Extra Virginity
549:
537:is better than
522:
506:
505:
498:
491:
487:
481:
459:Redirect pages.
449:
441:
421:
413:
405:
397:
382:Knowledge files
349:
348:
341:
334:
327:
323:
317:
309:What links here
305:
304:
297:
290:
286:
273:), businesses (
228:
227:
220:
216:
210:
201:
198:
143:
139:
109:
99:
98:
91:
84:
77:
73:
65:
37:
31:
12:
11:
5:
1063:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1026:
1025:
1012:
1001:
964:
963:
961:
958:
957:
956:
950:
944:
939:
931:
928:
927:
926:
921:
916:
911:
905:
900:
895:
889:
884:
879:
866:
863:
862:
861:
851:
848:
836:
824:
811:; if not, use
809:WP:Translation
802:
799:
798:
797:
789:
738:
719:
711:
708:
707:
706:
698:
691:
635:
634:
626:
621:
618:
615:
610:disambiguation
598:
597:
589:
584:
581:
578:
521:
518:
504:
503:
496:
488:
483:
480:
477:
461:
460:
457:
439:
434:sections (see
429:
390:
389:
379:
373:
363:
347:
346:
339:
332:
324:
319:
316:
313:
303:
302:
295:
287:
282:
226:
225:
217:
212:
209:
206:
197:
194:
183:
132:
129:
128:
113:
101:
100:
97:
96:
89:
82:
74:
69:
66:
51:
50:
41:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1062:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1035:
1022:
1016:
1010:
1005:
998:
993:
989:
985:
981:
980:
972:
970:
965:
954:
951:
948:
945:
943:
940:
937:
934:
933:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
909:
906:
904:
901:
899:
896:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
875:
869:
868:
860:
849:
846:
837:
834:
825:
823:. For example
820:
814:
810:
805:
804:
795:
790:
785:
777:
769:
761:
756:hatnotes, in
753:
745:
739:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
717:
712:
709:
704:
699:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:
681:
676:
675:
674:
671:
668:
663:
661:
657:
653:
647:
642:
632:
628:
627:
624:
614:
611:
605:
595:
591:
590:
587:
577:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:
546:
542:
540:
536:
532:
531:Thomas Howard
528:
517:
515:
511:
501:
500:WP:REDLINKBIO
497:
494:
490:
489:
486:
476:
474:
469:
466:
458:
453:
445:
440:
437:
436:WP:NOTSEEALSO
433:
430:
425:
417:
409:
401:
395:
394:
393:
387:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
367:
364:
361:
357:
354:
353:
352:
344:
340:
337:
333:
330:
326:
325:
322:
312:
310:
300:
296:
293:
289:
288:
285:
280:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
236:
233:
223:
219:
218:
215:
205:
193:
189:
187:
181:
177:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
156:
152:
148:
142:
136:
126:
122:
117:
114:
107:
106:
94:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
75:
72:
67:
63:
59:
55:
49:
47:
42:
35:
34:
29:
25:
21:
16:
1015:
1004:
991:
977:
793:
679:
672:
664:
648:
644:
607:
561:
551:
543:
523:
507:
470:
462:
391:
350:
306:
279:
256:
237:
229:
199:
190:
178:
159:
146:
144:
138:
134:
124:
120:
115:
43:
15:
731:Scandanavia
602:Main page:
558:Tom Mueller
259:valid title
93:WP:REDLINKS
1034:Categories
960:References
894:– an essay
857:produces:
831:produces:
639:See also:
631:WP:REDDEAL
539:John Smith
366:Categories
277:), etc.).
263:notability
166:verifiable
125:should not
86:WP:REDLINK
54:exceptions
28:WP:REDWARN
995:See also
794:would not
752:Otheruses
594:WP:REDDAB
493:WP:REDBIO
485:Shortcuts
473:Main Page
456:hatnotes.
452:Otheruses
376:Templates
336:WP:REDNOT
321:Shortcuts
284:Shortcuts
252:MediaWiki
240:page name
222:WP:REDYES
71:Shortcuts
58:consensus
865:See also
695:redirect
687:orphaned
623:Shortcut
586:Shortcut
465:navboxes
432:See also
356:Articles
343:WP:NORED
329:WP:REDNO
244:category
214:Shortcut
170:orphaned
147:red link
784:Seealso
776:Further
768:Details
424:Seealso
416:Further
408:Details
275:WP:CORP
235:title.
182:section
162:notable
155:deleted
780:, and
420:, and
271:WP:WEB
267:WP:BIO
79:WP:RED
744:About
690:spot.
444:About
760:Main
748:and
660:stub
448:and
400:Main
164:and
984:doi
819:ill
157:.
1036::
990:.
968:^
877:}}
871:{{
821:}}
817:{{
786:}}
782:{{
778:}}
774:{{
772:,
770:}}
766:{{
764:,
762:}}
758:{{
754:}}
750:{{
746:}}
742:{{
475:.
454:}}
450:{{
446:}}
442:{{
438:).
426:}}
422:{{
418:}}
414:{{
412:,
410:}}
406:{{
404:,
402:}}
398:{{
176:.
149:,
145:A
1023:.
999:.
986::
847:.
718:.
701:"
388:.
362:.
202:]
64:.
48:.
30:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.