Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive L

7649:

contribute to? I'm talking about people who can cope with e-mails and entering web addresses and typing letters, but who run away at the sight of anything resembling code or scripting (which is what Knowledge looks like when you try to edit an article, or if you even try to discuss an article). I guess ideally it could be some kind of web-based Wizard, which would take someone through the editing process step by step (and maybe layout too, although I suspect beginners would rather stick to the actual text at first). It could also invite people to register if they wish to, if they haven't logged in. Links to the "boot camp" and how-to guides could be peppered throughout the Wizard so existing efforts wouldn't be duplicated. I'm just frustrated at how editing a Knowledge article can be as tricky as handcoding HTML, whereas most of the world's experts on non-technical topics (the kind of topics Knowledge needs experts on the most) would have little or no experience in such matters or concepts. --

8407:

of chums who tend to stick together with a "my friend right or wrong" sort of attitude, and who include many editors of long-standing and (what is perceived by many people as being) authority; this has probably been part of the cause of hasty actions such as the protection of Talk pages and RfCs and other attempts to suppress criticism of her. On the procedural issue, it is indeed very difficult to see why the ArbCom needs these "clerks", especially why they need a "head clerk", and most especially why they appointed someone who has just been rejected as sufficiently trusted for an ArbCom rôle. I've seen the excuse that it's no big deal, as anyone can do what the clerks do — but then why appoint clerks? We're not a state with a government, and so the analogy with the appointment of officials is inapt,

9286:(it looks a little junky formatted, but as text in an editbox it is much cleaner, try it out). That's just a rough draft anyway. This really isn't that drastic. It gives new users a more realistic opportunity to properly create an article by telling them how to avoid all of the mistakes we see all the time with newpages. This template, if followed, would really cut down on the routine cleanup needed on most articles new users create. The need to cite a reference will make it easier for us to detect hoaxes (and to not inadvertantly delete an article just because we're unfamiliar with it), and it would help new users in a rush to create articles know that a lot of things such people want to create articles about aren't appropriate topics, since there can never be a good reference for those topics. 8812:

maintained even of the category structuyre were known to be acyclic, it deosn't seem to me that theis would be likely to be highly expensive in most cases -- the cost of the large lsit of member being developed, and of removing duplicates (if that were to be done) ought to be much higher, i would think. Going from a loop-based or recursive routine that uses one list to one that uses two lists is not likely to increase the cost by a huge factor. When the list of sub-cats is indeed long the checkign code would get more costly, but in that case the results are likely to be large and the call would be costly in any case. If need be the call could terminate after an arbitrary number of sub-cats or members has been returned, just as soem other special calls have a fixed upper bound on their results.

4178:. That is an invalid concept. It is much better to rely on fair use in this case. As for the claim that this can be used if GPL is changed to GFDL, that's also wrong. Authors of GPL software have no obligation to use the GFDL, and often don't. Even if they use the GFDL for documentation, I've never heard of them releasing the user interface copyright under that license. Asking the FSF for advice will also be fruitless. They do not have the authority to grant Knowledge the right to use screenshots of copyrighted third-party software. Either we use the image under the GPL, which I've explained is a bad idea, or we can't use it. It's also very unlikely that they will make an exception for their own software. 8233:

it? Or that the folk the community has elected are so weak, that she'll bewitch them and usurp their power? No. Rather this is about a silly personal vendetta, a conspiracy theory, and a lot of paranoia. As for the blanking etc, I don't know. I removed a thread (mistyped threat) from a user RfC, as it was commenting on an Arbcom decision not the actions of a user. Aaron, this whole thing has got totally out of hand. Someone deleted a bunch of non-encyclopedic stuff (perhaps unwisely), the deletion quickly was reversed - and then this crazy hysteria errupted. One admin was made into some form of hate figure - and

9242:

This leads to the vast ammounts of new articles being created (since many new users seem to want to create new articles more than they want to edit existing ones), which in turn is really at the heart of many problems WP faces. AfD gets overloaded, not because AfD itself is broken, but because too many articles are created that need to go to AfD. Potentially dangerous hoaxes can lie dormant for months because there are so many articles created that the experienced people looking at newpages and orphaned pages can't truly do a good job on every new page, and a lot falls through the cracks.

3852:

I think a better name for admins would be something more like "validated user", someone who we're pretty sure is not a vandal and will only edit with good intentions. In this light, admin "abuse" is simply any case of an uninformed or overzealous user screwing up which happens to involve the admin-only features. In short, my opinion is that peer review by the community - both other admins and registered users - is normally all that is needed. If someone is using their admin abilities for evil, they should not have been made an admin, nor should they be editing at all.

1657:" page, in order to streamline the process. A non-admin wishing to edit the page would get "edit (moderated)" rather than "view source". Any changes would then go into a queue of pages for an admin to moderate. The moderation process would consist of clicking "accept" or "reject". In the event of reject, there could be a field to specify the rejection reason. The process could include a couple of check-boxes to allow the admin to automatically add notes to the editor's user-talk page and/or the article talk page giving the outcome of the moderation decision. 1661:

apologising and saying "please try again later". Even if this is done, I believe that with administrators actively monitoring the queue of pages to be moderated, the vast majority of the time there would not be outstanding requests on a given page (provided at least that policy dictated that submitting vandalism for moderation was viewed with the same severity as vandalising an unmoderated page, so that people maliciously flooding the system could be blocked). A more sophisticated solution to the problem of multiple edits might involve the use of

2332:? An easy way would be to include a user's IP address AS WELL as their user ID in edit histories. This wouldn't involve any more breach of privacy than anon editors already accept. A situation recently arose where sockpuppetry appeared to be occurring, but there was no straightforward way to prove or disprove it, which would have helped to resolve an ongoing edit conflict. While I'm fairly sure sockpuppetry isn't all that widespread, when it does occur a quick way of stamping it out would be very helpful. Thoughts? 7830:

against ads may reallize how much farther we can go towards meeting the Foundation's goals if we did accept some form. Getting information to people in their own language is going to require serious money and may require different strategies. Currently the only languages we have a significant number of articles in are those languages from the developed world. For Hindi, Arabic, Bengali, and Punjabi, each top 10 by number of speakers in most counts, we have 1,000, 10,000, 500, and 39 articles respectively. -

8680:

esaily be seperated into sections but presented together, while if items are soreted intoa sub-category, they do not appear on the main category page. Simialrly, a list is much easier to sort according to a non-alphabetical principle. We aslo do not need any software enhancement to ahve an annotated list, while we woudl for an annmoteated category. There are many cases where a category is the better solution, but there are many others where IMO it is not. There are tradeoffs in each case.

3988: 3217: 4093:

restrictive license of all, it's not at all clear to me to what extent the GPL license of the software restricts the use of screenshots of that software - the GPL refers to the "source form" and the "binary form", but never the "look and feel" or "visual form" of the software. I strongly suggest that we not make a move on this until we can get an opinion from a professional copyright lawyer and/or the Free Software Foundation itself.

5577:- additional info could be added to copy the Harvard style but (hopefully) you get the idea. Now there would be two icons next to the reference url one that goes to the page and the second one that will take you to that reference material or give you a context pop-up on hover to show the info in a little yellow box. Either way of display, the info would be automatically added to a reference section at the bottom of the article. 1673:

consensus, and that the best way to achieve this would be to rule that the actions of an admin rejecting an edit and of an editor repeatedly submitting an already-rejected edit both count as reversions for purposes of 3RR (with the exclusions still applying, so that for example an admin can reject simple vandalism without limit). To this end, rejected edits should be visible in the page history (whether by default or not).

8944:"We don't have an article with this title, but you can create it if you log in or create an account(Registering a free account takes only a few seconds, and has many benefits:you simply need to choose a username and password and click "create account".). As an unregistered user, you may also submit the content that you wish to have created. Please read our introduction for more information about Knowledge" 3974:. However, most Linux software, like synaptic is GPL licensed. This means that derivate works is allowed, if you abide to the terms of the GPL. By allowing further use of this image, and publishing the image under the GPL, this is fulfilled in my opinion. So I can't see why a screenshot of a GPL'd program should be non-gpl, as it can be considered a derivate work. So I'm suggesting to change this with 9041:

items, though mostly in the area of hardware and software. in many cases there are non-wiki sites that offer such comparisons but sometimes i use Knowledge for the comparison by comparing two or more items' page. Book vs. Movie, PPC iMac vs.Intel iMac, H.264 vs. DivX (XivD), et cetera. Perhaps "vs." isn't the best phraseology but it's a common format used for looking up comparisons. Thank you,

8380:

particular case within 24 hours if no arbitrator objected. Fred Bauder later withdrew his vote to close the case, and it stayed open. (This can easily be verified from the talk page of the Clerk's office.) I'm sure that as we go along, other uses for the list will be found. The existence of Clerks should not prevent anyone from presenting evidence or editing the workshop -- clerks are just

9380:

blatantly obvious some suggestions to help new users avoid common problems. I mean, many new users do these things... I think just reacting to common mistakes endlessly is a waste of our time. Let's be proactive. Anyway, if adding a generic stub is going to ruffle the feathers of stub sorters I guess it can be forgone... but honestly these articles do need stub sorting too usually. --

8795:. "Show all members, including subcats" has also been suggested, but since categories don't form a tree (they're not necesssarily acyclic) enumerating all "members" is potentially quite expensive (to avoid the potential infinite loop, you have to check whether you've already visited each subcat as you go). I suspect this is not likely to be implemented any time soon. -- 1512:

more (to keep items off the list prematurely.) I have found several instances of uncontested Afd's with 5 - 10 deletes, where the case was that no one had done any serious checking of what turned out to be a poorly written article. My concern is that once listed on Uncontested, an article might receive less attention, being percieved as "already decided" by some.

6801: 6715:(Just to prove that I'm a constructive kind of guy, here's a suggested solution. Extend the ] tag so that one of the parameters is the title of a Knowledge article. The default action for clicking on the image will be to go to that article. There will also be a small icon below the image that links to the image's info page, for the few that wish to go there.) -- 10024:. The project would improve/create articles in the main namespace relating to negotiation, mediation, conciliation, facilitation, arbitration and other alternatives to litigation. I would especially encourage any interested persons engaged is dispute resolution on WP to participate. I believe this would broaden perspective and deepen insights into practice.-- 3982: 6043:. However, I don't think links to evtv1.com are a positive contribution. The videos are small, short, and of poor quality. They're preceded by advertisements and surrounded by advertisements, to the point where the ads overwhelm the content. I wish you luck in your enterprise, but hope you stop advocating for inserting the links into articles. - 4274:

effectively reproduce the storyline of that game as a comic book) -- but that won't affect WP. Certainly, for GNU programs, we will permit screenshots without restrictions.

7710:

sometimes not. Sometimes the albums are in italics, sometimes with dates, sometimes neither. Sometimes band members are linked, sometimes not. What do y'all think are good formatting policies for this? Is this even the right place to ask about this? Anyway, I'd like to know what the community thinks of this. -

3431:

articles, especially images that have been uploaded to the local version instead of the commons. Due to this english users wont be able to access, say, the article on spain on the spanish wikipedia which would probably be more informative and have more media than the english version. This is what i propose:

1445:) - there is simply no call for such disruption. Personal attack pages are speedied - and their creators may well be blocked. If you don't like your page being messed up by deletions, then the solution is don't use such templates. And if there are no such creations, then there will be no such deletions. -- 1501:. It is still in the experimental/development phase and is only currently updating when I am working on it, but the above link should give an idea of what is being created. I am hoping by posting here to solicit feedback on whether people view this as a good thing, what features might be useful, etc. 9322:

Yeah, the creation of duplicate articles is another common consequence. Often it's as simple as creating a page with the wrong capitalization or a common mispelling. I was going for a solution that would require minimal (or no) change in the software. A totally revamped, proactive creation process

9303:

Good idea; I agree that the existing guidance for a new article is pretty minimal. How about going farther and putting up actual prompts for references, categories, etc? If we prompted the user to enter alternative names (eg. "Antipodes", "Antipodal Point", "Other Side of the World"), we would have

9241:

Well, not really that dramatic, but as someone who works extensively on newpages, it seems to be that something needs to be done. People create articles without really understanding what they're doing, and that's understandable, we don't have a good enough system to help them avoid common mistakes.

9040:

Knowledge is a tremendous resource for so many things, but there is one NPOV 'type' page that I am forever looking up on the internet that Knowledge does not currently offer. That is verses pages, or comparison pages. I constantly trying to find out what the differnces, pros and cons, of a great many

9003:

The "Current events" versions of these pages are, (IMO rightly), in reverse chronological order. When they become history, we are keeping them reverse chronological. However new pages dealing old things are almost always done in chronological order. I think we should reverse the date order within the

8827:

On further consideration, this is one thing that would really make me trash my proposal! If someone is actively using a category as a list of XXX, and then it suddenly breaks just because someone (constructively) organised the category into sub-cats, then IMO categories can't do the job, and we need

8758:

Thanks again for the comments — I guess I'm coming round to thinking that AfD case-by-case is the better way to handle this. The thing about the annotation feature is that it would need to be widely used to be worth it, and I'm not seeing too much support here. Thanks for the pointer to AWB, but I

7709:

I feel like the formatting should include sections for band history, members, and discography, and a picture if available, and of course an overview/intro before sections. Those nice little boxes are cute too. From what I've seen now, when some of those sections do exist, sometimes albums are linked,

6991:

one of the more common Knowledge edits that call for a revert are on the Days of the Week articles. people are often adding their own name, or a friend's or an enemy's name. i have all 366 days of the week in my watchlist. i sometimes have to revert over 50 edits a day, and still, some of these edits

6427:

Like the "Templates used on this page" section that appears in the end of the page when editing, an "Images used on this page" would also be useful. Many images are removed from an article in order to be replaced by better ones, and while there's no categorisation of images, it is really hard to find

5908:

2) Adding video links doesn't add much Of course I disagree. An article on Jonathan Winters with a link to a classic clip of him on Jack Paar, that is rare is a gem...or Judy Garland's last performance at the Palladium. But editors are free to choose. I like Dr, Pepper...my wife hates it. There is no

5477:

The Dewey decimal system was designed for manual lookup, and its cumbersome, obscure numbers are not useful except when looking things up in a sorted index by hand. I suggest at the most that we create redirects from Dewey Decimal categories to roughly equivalent English-name categories. For example,

4748:

The census could be based on the en.wikipedia community or across all WP or even across the entire collection of sister sites through MetaWiki. The link, I imagine, would look much like the current fundraiser link at the top of the main page. I would also assume that there should be a request to fill

4385:

Superm401 - I think you're misunderstanding the suggestion, which I believe is to change the HTML generated for a user: link to include a class tag of the form "user-sig user-XXX" (where XXX is the user name). This would allow a user to define the presentation of a link to their user page (or anyone

4273:

FSF Writes the following in an email: I think screenshots are are generally non-derivative. I can think of an exception (for instance, a series of screenshots of a game which

3851:

Jimbo saw admins as just a user with sufficient experience to be granted the full software feature set. We commonly associate a degree of responsibility, activity, and positive example with these people, which is good for encouraging such behaviour, but also perhaps setting our expectations too high.

3778:

I agree, but I think this is only a small problem - there are thousands of style issues, such as excessive use of Latin abbreviations, missing articles, misplaced commas, awkward structure, and so on. If you want to focus on eliminating one across Knowledge, though, go for it - but expect to be doing

1979:

On a related note, some people like to summarize talk page discussions. Others like me think that deleting swaths of text from talk pages for any reason is rather alarming. The nice thing about this idea is that in addition to containing the discussion while it's in progress, other editors could also

1676:

Whatever the detailed policy, it would make it quicker and easier for non-admins to make useful input to protected pages, and would give less sense of exclusion to the many users who are unlikely ever to become admins, not because they are untrustworthy but because they do not have time to make the

1527:

Not presently, but categories are allowed to overlap so that something with only a few votes could be listed in Uncontested, Few Votes, and other places as applicable. I actually think having an uncontested category may have the opposite effect to what you suggest though. In other words that people

1511:

Question: Is there a count before the afd is listed on Uncontested? All new noms on which the nominator adds a vote would be on Uncontested automatically if there is not. I would suggest adding a count prior to listing on this - and I would make it more than 5 (the "few votes" limit) preferably 10 or

9477:

I think you're right about people reading the linked guidelines. Let's pull the key points out of the introduction, tutorial, and your first article and put them directly on the edit page (either in and/or above the edit box - perhaps more feasible?). Some things to also consider warnings against:

9190:

of the articles for two topics compare it to the other. Honestly, if you think there's enough to write about a comparison that it deserves an article, as in the evolution/creation controversy, just come up with a name and write it. AfD will hardly ever destroy a good article - at worst they'll merge

8328:

Re the argument that we don't need an official Clerk's office for this, I would ordinarily agree but for the fact that while pretty much anyone can tackle evidence, the workshop, etc., only trusted users can post to the Arbcom mailing list, close cases on behalf of the arbcom, etc. Since we're going

8232:

Given the fact that there has been such inexplicable vitriol shown to KM by one section of the community, this was always going to be a very provocative move. But if she is willing to do it, and our elected Arbcom willing to trust her, that should be sufficent. Is anyone arguing that she's not up to

8077:.If you can add news stories which are important in those leagues, then go fo it; the more the merrier! It's not much work, as there aren't many football matches in a week for the coca cola league, but i'm currently maintaining a large proportion of all the content, and would like some help with it. 6789:

Interesting question. I agree that it is strange that the reader gets to peek "behind the curtains" just by clicking the image. Intuitively, the image description page should be semi-hidden, much like the page history or editing views. I have no good suggestion. Can we have an "about this image" tab

6729:

frequent problem on the Main Page, where the featured article picture is often assumed to be a link to the featured article. On the other hand, it seems difficult to insert a separate link to the image description page in a way that's appropriate in all contexts. Additionally, it's confusing to make

6704:

page, then click on the RedHat logo expecting to get more information on RedHat (perhaps to go to the company's website). What he got, of course, was something different, leading him to think that the site was broken. Another example is the graphic that looks a bit like a wristwatch at the top right

6487:

Well, I'm not suggesting that an article's 'authority' be unrevokable, so the odd bus here or there isn't really an issue. The trouble with the stable versions is that, unlike the authority idea, they don't allow for continual updates to the article. I just think "authority" sections would allow for

6445:

What if contributors who could rightly claim "authority" on a particular subject could be granted the right to provide definitive sections for such articles. Such sections would be at the top of any article, indellible and under the control of the authority. At the same time, the rest of the article

6284:

The problem I have with this change is that "protected" and "unprotected" aren't commands. You don't "protected" a page, you "protect" it, just as you "edit", "delete", "move", and "watch" a page (the other action tabs). The new version is very confusing... what does "protected" mean? Does that mean

6060:

When I got promoted to a sysop, I went off to the Administrator's noticeboard to add it to my watchlist. Then I discovered something: the page was protected! It was baffling! So I click the "unprotect", and I realize it was protected against page moves. Whether or not this qualifies as protection is

5982:

SEWilco, if people link to copyrighted video clips that have not been authorized, this is a real problem. There are so many sites on the Internet that just grab clips and put them up. If you link to those sites, the material will not be there once the Copyright owner gets wind...which is coming real

5853:

Furthermore, you have to be a little more specific about "All of the clips have rights cleared for Internet viewing worldwide." What kind of license is this? Is it compatible with the Knowledge project? Perhaps a longer clip can be condensed into a smaller animated GIF and uploaded to Knowledge, but

5550:

You're apparently referring to the LC "Classification Web" USA exception. That only applies to the "Classification Web" service; there is an LC "classification outline" without a copyright notice and I don't know the copyright status of that outline. There already is similar info in the above LoCC

5312:

Just to make reversion easier, I think that when you click on "diff" and see the differences between edits, another button should appear near the top that says "revert". Obviously, this automatically reverts the edit and provides a summary. Reverting is such a business, especially when the change is

4692:

I propose to have a page where information would be collected and then analysed to give trend, demographic, geographic, linguistic and area of interest information. The fields would have to be "check box" rather than "fill in" with words so as to make data analysis easier. The kinds of questions I

4306:

derivative works of the sculpture. That means they can not be released without the permission of the sculptor unless the sculpture is in the public domain. I feel that what the FSF most likely meant by non-derivative is that the images are "fair use". However, you're free to make a template based

3894:

I agree. I'd give delete to the power user, but modify the software to make image deletion make sense (not only to make images undeletable, but also to make clicking the delete tab delete the image as well as its accompanying image article). I think it's fine also to give them limited blocking, such

2748:

if you remove an item from your watchlist and you are the last person watching it." We should certainly not be compelled to watch pages we aren't interested in just because the creator decided to take it off their watchlist while we were watching it. It also probably wouldn't be as effective as we'd

1422:

Ultimately, that's not the problem at all. The problem is the lack of deliberation on the subject. Very few templates speedy-deleted actually fall under the speedy deletion criteria. It really isn't that hard to list a template, userbox or otherwise, on TfD, and, even if deletion is the decision, we

1380:

Can people PLEASE STOP speedy deleting userboxes before they finish TfD, as has happened a lot in the last few days. It's playing hob with my user page for a start, and there are people out there with even more userboxes than me.. At least could people put why on the relevent talk page, so that when

9699:

Needless to say, such a feature if it were added would be highly specific to Knowledge. Many other existing and potential Mediawiki projects have no concept of disambiguation. I think instead we should have some more generic scripting mechanism that we can use to inject our own content such as link

9668:

The system doesn't know what is and is not a dab page. All it checks in links is if it exists, and what its length is (for proper color coding). How can it know if it's a dab page? Search if it contains one of the many disambig templates? I just think this would increase processor usage, but I'm no

9522:

I do think most new users are going to read text if it's in the very editbox they're about to use. Yeah, the final text (if this ever goes anywhere) should be improved beyond my draft to be as useful as possible to new users, but brevity and clarity shouldn't be sacrificed. I'm hoping to get some

8742:

That said, I think your proposal to allow annotation in listing items in a category wouid be a good one. In soem cases it might well dispense with a list, and in many cases it might make a category easier to navigate. Have you loged this as a feature regquest on Bugzilla yet? If so, what is the big

8725:

But there may well be "sailors" who are wanted in the list, but about whom there are not articles, and if articels were created they would be nothing but stubs. Perhaps "sailors" is a case where a category would be better, but there are many many cases where this is not true, IMO. It is easy enough

8634:

Re mirrors, your point is an interesting one; but since these people are essentially "ripping off" (albeit in a legally and morally correct way (mostly)) WP content, should we take them into account when deciding the best way to do Knowledge? Shouldn't we make Knowledge as good as we can, whatever

8406:

My two penn'orth. On the personalities: I don't approve of vitriol, but I've seen Kelly Martin behave both badly and very dubiously; I'd certainly not trust her as an ArbCom member, and people like me voted against her for that reason. On the various recent antics: she's clearly in a little group

8275:

a quasi-official position to be created, and by first doing so (process wonking?) and by then saying "it's done, stuff you's all" all we do is fire the flames of discontent. Happy happy campers will contribute better, and if nothing else doing things a different way will mean that less time has to

7787:

First off, sorry for editing your comment a little; the formatting was messing up the page. I can't deal with points one and two, but point three has been discussed before, and we've agreed not to have any ads on Knowledge. There are a group of users actively opposing any attempt to add advertising

7705:

I've been working on a lot of bands recently and I've noticed that for the major bands there tends to be some consistent formatting, but for less significant bands there's really almost no formatting. Is there, and I simply haven't found it? If there's not, wouldn't it be great if there was? If you

7648:

I couldn't find this exact suggestion anywhere on perennial proposals or elsewhere, so apologies in advance if it's been mentioned a lot. Basically, is there any movement at all on here to make Knowledge something that the less-technically savvy but very non-tech-subject savvy experts out there can

7447:

Yes, yes. This is only example of Wikiquest (Quests with finding stuff - NPOV, NPA, vandalisms - it is very funny too :) Others quests are: killing stubs, finding Cthulhu rituals (special vandalisms like "gfdkfdgkfdskgsd"). Maybe this quest (Welcome) will be easier (for wikimaster), if players will

6905:

I suggest that we create a formal policy strongly suggesting that material not be multiposted (identical copies of a discussion placed in multiple locations), particularly when the multiposted content makes no reference to this fact. I've observed this on several occasions recently. This disruptive

6093:

The problem is that some people (or maybe just I) use those tabs to ascertain the protection status of an article. If it says "protect", I know the article is not protected. If it says "unprotect", I know it has some sort of protection applied. "Change protection" is too long; "protection"'s length

5540:

I don't think it's in the interest of an international encyclopedia to use material that is copyrighted in all but one nation. I had no idea these systems could even be copyrighted - considering they're more systems than documents - but if they claim they are I think we'll have to just refrain from

4236:

However, I think wikipedia distributes the source of the image, since we make it availvable in the same size and quality as the upload. The image is not ascii, but GPL says nothing about that the source has to be in ASCII. JPG is in fact just data, a special program (image viewer) can inteprent, no

3812:

I've seen frequent outcries against so-called admin abuse. While most of those are exaggerated or downright unfounded, it is admittedly true that admins are not really held accountable for anything. Sure, there's peer review from other admins, and all admin actions are logged and can be undone, but

3345:

I have been printing articles relevant to a project I am doing and realised that there are parts of the article that I don't want. I wonder if there is a feature that could be implemented where the user can select to print the information under each subheading, rather than having to print the whole

3327:

Perhaps edits of articles could be highlighted for up to X number edits after and/or until X number of users/members of X qualification vote positively on it. This way users that come to the article know that a) the highlighted edits have yet to be authenticated and/or agreed upon b) it's harder to

1881:

I've been seeing some very long drawn out exchanges, often between a small number of users, on discussion pages. I've been part of some myself. It can be very annoying to read through seemingly endless text while people work out the minutia of some issue, or else just have a pissing match. Often

1725:

For places like Help Desk, Reference Desk, Village Pump, AfD, RfA, etc. Long discussions are difficult with a single edit anywhere page. Old but ongoing discussions eventually get pushed to the top by new posts, so a format where each thread exists as an object, and another page could show a list

1672:

would need to be worked out. It might perhaps have a number of cases, with the acceptance criteria depending for example on whether a page is locked because of simple vandalism or because of POV warring. I believe that moderation should not be a means for admins to exert editorial control against

9968:

So what I'd suggest for you to consider is making a "wikiQuestion" where topics and search are question based and not concept based. For example a user needs answering a question "WHY the Sun is round?", "HOW the fridge works?" or "WHO..", "WHEN", etc. where the page would be indexed on words in a

9379:

I think this template makes a little more sense (some of the objections raised in the TfD have merit). It does more suggesting than "forcing", and the 2 conventions it does force (a standard intro, and listing references) are not really going to hurt any new article. The key idea is to just make

8730:

for one piece of software that can be so used). I have often seen AfDs on list pages where the decision was that a category would be better, and also seen CfD discussions where a cat was deleted in favor of a list, and in many cases i think that having both is the better choice. There just isn't a

7883:

I find the Knowledge search engine somewhat lacking in usability, and sometimes will instead use Google to do a wikipedia domain specific search. Google is making $ off of my use of their search engine, but none of that $ is going back to Knowledge. What about adding Google, Yahoo!, and other

7689:

One of the beauties of the wiki syntax is that, for the most part, it's just the text on the page, with blank lines between paragraphs. That's all you need to know to contribute at the simplest possible level. Other contributors can add other formatting. On the other hand, editing an existing page

7613:

Image maps are quite handy in many situations, but with current editing support still limited to text fields and file uploading, it seems like they would be quite cumbersome to edit. I think they'd still be justified though in the relatively rare situation where they're needed - but a nice editing

6935:

It depends on the context. If a post is just to announce something, or doesn't require significant comment, I don't see a problem with it being posted in two or three places. This is assuming that duplicate posting is necessary for the situation, like low traffic for at least one of the locations.

5962:

There are issues to be resolved here. For example, some TV and radio shows are becoming available in multimedia formats, either at no cost or at a fee. It should be decided whether it is OK to link to such material. Whether there are ads in the material does not seem to me to be as important as

5926:

Folks, I see encylopedias being MULTIMEDIA. The licensors of the material have not allowed us the right to facilitate consumers downloading the clips. They believe streaming is fine...but have not allowed for downloads yet. But even when they eventually do allow downloading, they will not allow it

5613:

I guess the people that use tab browsing are in the minority. I would much prefer to middle click on the referring site and read the info instead of it opening the same page or in my instance of mozilla it wont load that page but refresh the current page and takes me to the bottom. It needs some

5571:

I believe this is the correct place to discuss this? Anyway, there is a small problem with the current method of references - there are two styles 1) adds the external url for direct viewing and 2) is the Harvard style where it is given a number and is listed at the bottom of the page. Both have

5243:

It took a few weeks of visiting Knowledge before I realized the little "Deutsch", "Français", etc. links part-way down the page on the left. After I started using them (I speak German too), I remember being confused as to how to get back (and I'm not as incompetent as that makes me sound). Anyway,

4973:

When you click on an interwiki link, you can be sent to, say, Wiktionary. From Wiktionary, there's no easy way to get back to Knowledge's main page (Besides back button), save a click to the main page of Wiktionary, and then a click on Knowledge the sister project. Personally, I don't mind at all,

4173:

First of all, whether software runs on Linux has nothing to do with it being released under the GPL. Windows software using the GPL exists, and there is also proprietary Linux software. The template's name is likely to mislead. Further, we do not want to use images under the GPL. That means we

4102:

Certainly checking with the FSF wouldn't be a bad idea. I'm confident that they would permit Knowledge to use the screenshots under a free license, since it is in keeping with their primary goals. BTW, when I said releasing screenshots under GPL, I meant GFDL (which is generally what would be used

2900:

Plus, they could create one account (and age it four days, if we're talking about semi-read-protection), read Special:Unwatchedpages with that account but vandalize as an anon or under different new accounts. The logic behind keeping Special:Unwatchedpages locked up tight is pretty compelling, I'm

2220:

using ISO 8601 for times. It's easier to compare ISO dates and times by direct comparison, as your brain can compare them just like any two decimal numbers. They seem to be more acclimatable to US users than the British form currently used. After over two years, I still have to pause to shuffle

2116:

Forgive me if this has been suggested but why not have moderator aproved polls being created? Like a user can create a poll and a moderator has to approve to make it functional. This is probably needed so constant repeats or bad in general polls arent all over the place. But this would give us the

8679:

IMO there are cases where list are better. First of all, when many entries on a list are significant enough to lsit, but not to have separate articles about. Indeeed "List of minor characters in..." is often a good way to merge many stub articels conencted with a work of fiction. Also, lists can

7981:

I would argue that if searching is one of the main frustrations, than perhaps we could provide, in addition to the simple google-like search box, an advanced search page, like google has, for more specific searches. A feature has been suggested on bugzilla for wikinews which would allow users to

7936:

testing for the German Knowledge. Searching is one of the key frustrations and usability problems with Knowledge. Why reinvent the wheel, improving Knowledge's internal search engine, when Google, Yahoo!, and others already do a good job with searching? As well, people already have familiarity

7510:

You can edit any section of an article without having to load the whole page up, but this is impossible if you want to edit the intro section at the top. Could a discreet link be introduced that allows you just to edi the pre-section section of an article? I'm think an option in the sidebar where

7425:

I think the idea is to make a game of production as a opposed to a game of finding stuff. The problem I see is point tallying. It's almost more work checking to see if work is done then actually doing the work. I was thinking for this welcoming quest, you could give each player a link that they

6514:

This doesn't help - since anyone can add and/or change the references. In the end, we always seem to come back to, "well, if the user didn't understand that wikipedia isn't reliable and didn't read the entire discussion page, and didn't check at least 3 versions of the page history, then what did

5893:

I misspoke about uncopyrighted material. I meant uncleared. What we have done at evtv1.com is license clips from: National Geographic, SONY/Columbia Trisar Home Video, BFS Home Video, MPI Home Video, Acorn Home Video and dozens of other labels for the right to excerpt the DVDs into 1 and 2 minute

5857:

In the end, I'm not fully convinced that videos add that much to an encyclopedia. The heavy advertising (after all, bandwidth is not cheap, esp. for video) will make most editors decide "no, it is not worth the advertising." If you really think it would add something to Knowledge, I advise you be

4830:

I think that's a reasonable idea as long as microdata is not available at all, that the only available data would be anonymized aggregate data. Further, there might be some difficulty in combining census data for account-holding editors with IP/anonymous editors, so an automated data addition of

4256:

I see a image as a derivate work, no more, no less. There is creativity involved in deciding what data to show with it, but it is of a GPL'd work, which means in my opinion, it has to be GPL. In fact, I feel wikipedia has somehow been violating the intent of the GPL by not stating that images are

3861:

The term leads to a lot of problems, at least among newer users who aren't familiar with the culture of Knowledge as it was growing up (I'll include myself in that group). An "administrator", to most people, is someone in charge, someone with authority, someone who administers things because they

2568:

as evidence that a review of this policy is necessary. If I'm honest, the whole idea seemed rather backward from the moment it was introduced. You're actually forcing people to have MORE anonymity before they can create articles, which gives serious vandals an advantage, as vandalism is harder to

1468:

is one that was recently deleted then restored, for instance). And people who have never used or condoned attack templates are having perfectly reasonable templates removed from their user pages. To say that this is because of attack templates is equivalent to having encyclopedic articles deleted

9556:

Why not lose the "hide-comment" mark-up, so that the boilerplate prompts appear in the new article? There's nothing will get the attention of a new creator more than a line saying "You can replace this text with your own introductory passage" across the top of their beautiful new page. And while

9442:

I hate to sound overly cynical, but there are a lot of users who I don't think will ever click a link to read guidelines before creating a page. This is a natural sort of thing webmasters should expect on the internet, and must design sites in anticipation of it. If the text is right there when

7847:

Hiring full-time multilingual Wikipedians to work on expanding the scope of the project is a great idea. But any kind of advertisement would place us in a position where the ad provider could pressure us to censor or include certain content. Certainly Google Adsense does, and I don't know of any

7829:

John, yes we are in that much trouble. To continue to grow at the current rate, the hardware guru's have estimated our harware expenditures should be $ 4-5million for 2006. Fundrives probably cannot raise that kind of money, though anything is possible. Eventually the people that are so strongly

5978:

As I mentioned in a post in the television section, I personally wrote a book on The Prisoner TV series. I went to conventions years ago and the real aficionados wanted access to every photo conceivable. Having clips of The Prisoner would be cool...(evtv1 plans to put them up in the future.) The

5313:

minor but vandalistic/innaccurate/some other inadequacy. If you have a slow connection, it's three pages and a summary you have to go through before achieving a revert. When I want to revert I'm looking at the differences and I want to be able to click "no, go back to the old one" more easily. --

5110:

On another wiki I edit, they use phpwiki. It is generally not nearly as nice as Mediawiki, but it has one very nice feature: On a page history, each version has a checkbox. You check any two checkboxes to generate a diff between those two versions. Very nice if you suspect sneaky vandalism.

3655:

I see that a lot of articles say "passed away" when they mean "died" (and similarly with other parts of the verb e.g. "passing away"). I can't think that it's good to use this expression in an encyclopedia. They should generally just say "died" as this is direct and simple (except of course in

3610:

If there are only two units (metric and English), we might give both. Otherwise, generally, we cite the unit appropriate in the context of the article topic, leaving it to the user to do any conversion required for their comprehension. I admit though, it would be pretty neat if you could give an

3548:

The proposal above does not work when articels are not "the same" on differnt langauge ediotiosn. One wikipedia may have only a summery articel on a topic, another may have several detailed artilces, yet anotehr may parse the subject differetnly and combine two topices but have severasl detailed

9185:

We discuss pros and cons in many places. For example, articles on data structures and algorithms routinely compare them to other data structures and algorithms. Articles on noneuclidean geometry compare to Euclidean geometry. Articles on Civil War Union generals compare to other Civil War Union

8911:

I agree, it does not help casual users, but it's a lot better than the deeply crappy systems we had before(one of which I wrote, so I know what I'm talking about when I say they were crappy). That's why I'm so excited by them. It would certainly be great, and, I agree, important, to add these

8308:

I strongly favor having a secretary or clerk for the ArbCom. There are numerous clerical tasks that have to be performed to help keep the cases tidy, and that burden does not need to fall on ArbCom members. Without a chair of the ArbCom, if it difficult to even know how to address a question or

5986:

I want to create a resource page for WIKI editors to pick and choose. Every clip will be 100% legal under the Digital Millenium Act and Copyright laws. It is safe and clean. I would bet other copyright holders would eventually want to add their libraries to the WIKI Video Resource center...I am

5974:

Kim, the objective of Knowledge as I see it is to offer information free to the public. I would believe that an article on Malcolm X that quotes his now famous line, "By any means necessary" would benefit by a video clip of the first time he uttered that phrase...which was captured on film (and

5258:

On the other hand, it is very frustrating that interwiki links have to be manually added to every version of every article. If you click the link to the German version, you should always have a link back to the English version. That, along with interwiki link order, should all be consistent and

3430:

One thing i realized during my short residence on wp is its huge size, language wise. Now if there was just wp in english, everyone with the knowledge of english would contribute to the sole wp database, but because of so many versions in different languages this has caused localisation of many

9098:

I'm unconvinced that choosing comparisons to write about is arbitrary, after all if we have sources for the comparison already being done elsewhere, I see no reason not to report the facts. The important thing is that we report comparisons whose importance has already been established by their

5789:

I added about 100 links to articles (all external links to video clips approx. 90 seconds in length) and editors started deleting the links saying I was SPAMMING. I engaged several in discussions and while they would not restore the links, I truly did understand the appearance of a conflict of

4402:

This certianly should not be doen automatically in a way which would mandate a user revealing when that user was or was not loged in, IMO. That is a privicy violation. It alos significantly lengthens the wiki-source for a sig, IMO to litte gain. But if people want to do this, adn if supprot is

4290:

If I interpret that correctly, FSF is releasing any screenshots of GNU programs under a free use license with no restrictions. If this is the case I would create a template for these and quote the mail. I agree that screenshots are generally non-derivative - it seems like the person taking the

9657:

It'd be nice if the "show preview" included a big warning at the start of the page about any links to disambig pages in the text. I suspect they creep in because people don't realize there's multiple usages, and highlighting would go a long way to eliminating them (for new work at least). —

8811:

Unless there is soemthing odd about the way PHP works in such matters, this seems to em to require merely the addition of one extra data structhure, a list of sub-cats visited so far, to be passed through the routine. As a list of sub-cats already detected but not yet visited would need to be

6855:

I'd like to suggest having a standard template for info about chemical compounds, like the ones for biological species. There would be a standard box saying stuff like the density, appearance, discovery date, etc, the same stuff that appears in references like the CRC handbook. Looking up a

6016:

simple: case by case. It depends, after all, on the content of each clip. If an online clip is really (really!) relevant to an article, we'll link it under "External links", even if it includes 15s of advertisement. You'll have to argue notability for each clip, individually, on the pertinent

5802:

Knowledge should not link to uncopyrighted materials...which is a real problem on the Internet. If the Wiki community is convinced that there is too much of a conflict of interest for me to link, maybe we could create an area for editors to choose appropriate clips for articles. For instance,

4872:

Well, on that, what are the techinical requirements of putting such a proposal in place? Is it feasable? I'm not entirely sure what Ceyockey was saying but I agree about the privacy concerns - the results should not be able to be tracked back to individual users. More in general, where does a

9168:

Having kept a fair eye on that article, it's not in great shape -- its current state (still not too good) only exists because one wise soul just knifed about 60% of the text. The point being just that articles which exist precisely to play up something controversial and to highlight the most

1384:

I would like to suggest, since lots of people are getting worked up about this, that any userbox deletions should go through full TfD. Even if they might normally be speedy deletes. This is a controversial topic right now and I think it's time for a bit of diplomacy, so can people please TfD

8379:

You're presuming the mailing list is going to be only used for issues directly related to arbitration. There are a lot of maintenance duties, etc. that a private mailing list could very well be required for. To cite one recent instance, Kelly Martin emailed the list saying she would close a

3938:

choices in order to think. If it were possible to control another editor against his will, he would become an extension of the controller—his cognitive abilities would no longer be a benefit to the project—and the content of his contributions would be nothing more than the POV of the person

2465:

but it really doesn't seem to affect it that much than a slight change in policy (ie. an exception for when the Foundation gives the green light to pursue action against a vandal, for example). For example, this WikiProject could be used to sue Willy on Wheels, or sue convicted sex offender

8695:

Yah, I see what you're saying, and the example "List of minor characters in Hamlet" would be OK, because that'll never change. But the "List of XXX", where XXX is a more general category — like "List of sailors" — should really be abolished, because it will always be wrong (ie. there will

4092:

The person taking the screenshot should not be releasing that screenshot under the GPL, which is a software license containing a variety of conditions and terminology specific to software. They should be releasing it under an image license. Even if they release it under free use, the least

1660:

Admittedly, there is an issue with what happens if a subsequent request to edit the page comes in while there is still an outstanding moderation decision on the page to be edited. An expedient solution would simply be to revert to the "view source" behaviour in that situation, with a note

9209:

There has been a discussion again on slashdot about edit wars, and bokmann had an interesting suggestion: to include some sort of indication of the volatility of the article in the header. Lots of ways to do this - last edit date, edits in past week/month/year, whatever. It may be worth

1440:

We could equally solve the problem if certain people desisted in insulting other editors, and personalising disputes, by creating 'attack' userboxes (calling people 'fascists' and comparing them to Stalin). There are a host of ways to express yourself and air your views or grievences (see

5497:

The Dewey and LC classification systems use short classification codes designed to fit on the spine of a book. Dewey seems protected, but I'm not sure if the general LC classifications are restricted. The LC system details in the "Classification Web" service are copyrighted. If the LC

4252:

The terms and conditions of the GPL are available to anybody receiving a copy of the GPLed work ("the licensee"). Any licensee who adheres to the terms and conditions is given permission to modify the work, as well as to copy and redistribute the work or any derivative version.

9406:, where one of the bullet points is "If you're a newcomer, please first read the introduction, tutorial, and your first article to ensure the quality of your new article." But the way the bullet point is shown on the page isn't prominent enough and easily overlooked. This text is at 6826:

Thanks for your feedback, everybody. There are some good ideas here. Flcelloguy, it was some time since I last clicked on the Wikinews logo, but I tried it again just now and I see that it is fixed. Thanks for doing that. I won't say any more on this topic, because I just followed the

8429:

Presumably the arbcom is well aware of Kelly's personality and chose anyway to appoint her as Head Clerk. People like me voted for them (Filiocht, Mackensen, Sam Korn, et al) for that reason. I trust their judgement. If Kelly makes a mess of it, I expect them to "sack" or "fire" her.

6699:

When you click an image, Knowledge takes you to that image's information page, which often has a large version of the image. This is not how the rest of the Web works, and I find that novice users of Knowledge tend to get frustrated by this. For example, today I saw someone go to the

5254:

Some articles have too many language versions to fit. Also, it seems to imply that the articles are just different language versions of the same content, when really they're just the same topic on another project. Making them hyperlinks makes them seem like they link to something far

9931:

flag, it contains, instead of the text, a serialized object, which is unmarshalled and called to retrieve the actual text. The magic trick seems to be that the serialized object does not have the text within it; instead, it retrieves another serialized object from another row on the

8497:

That is, include the annotation in the article, where it can be maintained with the article itself. Then we just need a change to the ] feature to (optionally) include annotations in Category pages. Then we can ditch the lists, and replace them with appropriate use of categories.

7888:

or some special search page? We can't endorse just one search engine, so maybe we could put multiple search boxes. While I'm opposed to ads on Knowledge itself, the ads would be on search results hosted by Google, Yahoo!, ... and contains ads like any google/yahoo results page.

8072:

Hello there, tis i, Spum. I have managed to now get the Football Portal on Wiki/news to churn out relevant stories, and there's been a good stready flow of them appearing from other users. Now, shortly, i'm going to be adding a transfers section, listing recent club transfers.

6906:

activity leads to a variety of problematic effects, most importantly forked discussion where some interested contributors are not aware of existing discussion by others. Instead, the content should be located in one place with links announced in other locations. It could be at

6524:

The other point here is that it would be really nice if the odd academic, who didn't want to spend the next 100 years trying to prevent an article decending into chaos, could make a contribution safe in the knowledge they they weren't going to have to watch the article for all

4950:

Is there a reason why there are so many different wiki's it is hard to navigate and do things without going back to the main page of that wiki and using the interwiki links, I propose a total murger of all wiki's into one for each language it would make it a lot easier to use.

5268:

Well, one row or however many are needed. I'm not sure I agree that linking on the side, rather than the top, would necessarily imply anything different about the content if done distinctly. Perhaps all I have to say is the current scheme is a bit confusing to new-comers.

8577:

inside the wikipedia progam, I don't know how much trouble would be to do that, or witch person to contact about the proposal. By the way, there might be someone allready thinking a way to implement this, because this is a great idea (well, at least in my point of view).

8123:

It's "going live" any day now, but there have been concerns expressed that it's a "back door" for people who failed re-elction to maintain their powerbase. Additional concerns around why this person would need access to the abritrator only mailing list have been raised.

8023:

could next work on improving searching of Knowledge. An advanced search page would indeed be useful. And only recently, I came across this searching page that explains more how to use the search feature, yet alone these links to external search engines. We should make

5373:

Rollback is strictly for reverting vandalism. What about when someone adds a sentence or something that is POV, for instance. One sentence, but a bad addition. You still need to revert it! So I suppose this suggestion is to give more users rollback and allow rollback on

7319:== Quest Name == Narrator's note *'''Desription:''' *'''WikiMaster:''' *'''Start date:''' *'''Number of points for quest:''' **'''xxx points''' per... **'''yyy points''' per... *'''Realized by:''' *Below write your realized quests + —] ] 00:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC) *# 3029:

Dammit, I need to register :( What I want to say is that an alternative to the second feature which you pointed the flaw to, could be the creator gets the confirmation, instead of the last watcher, since the creator is usually the person most dedicated to it anyway.

9523:

consensus going before changing anything... I know a lot of people would have a kneejerk reaction against something they assume is trying to curtail creating new articles. This is about helping people make better articles, not stopping them from making articles. --

7426:

could include in their welcome, and then the "wikimaster" could just go to the page and click what links here to get a tally. Of course, maybe we could just set up the quest and have the players edit the accomplishments, sort of like the Wikiholic hall of fame.--

4125:

Oops, sorry for browbeating you then. Contacting the FSF sounds good - would you do the honours? Make sure you ask in general terms about GPL'ed software and not just FSF software, although even just free licensing of FSF software screenshots would be a big help.

2399:, one of our aims is too keep the Knowledge civil. We need stronger rules to keep things civil, and warnings tags like {{civil1}} and {{civil2}} to keep things civil, and those who do instigate persistantly should be blocked, as they are disrupting the Knowledge. 4562:, Hatten ar Din_, it's apparent that a) people are creating articles out of internet memes, and b) people wrongly consider some memes to only be notable if they get publicity offline, like All Your Base. Obviously, some guideline needs to be set to separate the 5130:

I never got it to work properly. The first time it always works: I can happily click radio buttons at will and the buttons appear and dissapear as a response to my clicks. When I hit the 'compare' button and go 'back' again, the radio buttons are frozen. Using

8892:

How does that help casual users? How are they even supposed to know about this "toolserver"? I didn't until yesterday. I still say that a "Show all" button in a category is necessary to make the category system really useful. (Having said which, yes, they

6967:

This is a proposed very simple way to deal with non-controversial article deletions. The proponet propses a live test in the near future. I think the idea is a good one, but that soem degree of community support is needed to sanction a live test. Please visit

2365:

page sucks just a wee bit. I'd like to improve it, but I can't just go off willy-nilly adding things, without asking you lot what you'd like to see. Asking for ideas? Yes, I have gone off the bat. Still, your thoughts, suggestions opinions will be welcomed at

8411:

Doc Glasgow; the only reason that most of us can see for this extension of official or semi-official (or quasi-official) positions is some variation on jobs for the boys and girls, and you don't have to share my anarchist leanings not to like it very much.

9964:

The encyclopedic part of wikipedia is great, but has a minor problem. Making it bigger also means making it harder to use specially if the "topic" is a combination of different things - like science. In science it's not this or that but mostly all together.

7291:

Someone else thought of this first? I thought I was the only one. I scrubed it when people started talking about how the editors thought of wikipedia as an RPG and didn't take their work seriously. I restored my work, is this what you meant, Przykuta? -:

5842:

I don't disbelieve your good faith, but look at it from a different perspective. If what you say is all true, then about 16% of the entire clip is ads. While you can justify it, these are Wikipedians who deal with quite a bit of linkspam every day (I should

9261: 9007:

What do folk thinlk and how old is "history" and how new is "current". I would suggest that the previous month should remain reverse chronological, but previous months be swapped round. IE on Feb 1 2006 we could/should shuffle all the entries for Dec 2005.

8938:"We don't have an article with this title, but you can create it if you log in or create an account. As an unregistered user, you may also submit the content that you wish to have created. Please read our introduction for more information about Knowledge" 5454:

except it might be, say, "List of articles (or categories) by Dewey Decimal". It'd be best to avoid creating categories, eg "Category:796.48". Rather than classifying the whole of wikipedia in one go, maybe try doing a single dewey decimal classification.

3410:

That is true for users not logged in. For logged in users, myu understanding is that the connection between an edit and the IP address lasts only as long as the edit is on teh Recent Changes log, which is not more than a few weeks, if I recall correctly.

6469:

You're effectively talking about protecting a portion of an article. I doubt anyone will support this, as no matter how great the authority, the chance that they'll make a mistake and then get hit by a bus is always there. You may want to take a look at

6308:

I agree with Ficello. Sorry Ambush Commander, but you cannot seriously call this consensual given the lack of people who commented on it. Since most people on the village pump don't really know what MediaWiki messages are, I'd suggest dropping a note on

4629:

should cover it. Note that it no longer relies on google hits. It's mainly a question of coverage in external (news?) media. Something Awful probably doesn't qualify, since it intentionally links to awful sites and that doesn't make them notable really.

4892:

There was a survey made by an academic group in Germany of the German language Knowledge a while back, and it worked so well that they later surveyed some English language Wikipedians as well. I wonder if they've published the English Knowledge study

9277: 7307:

Something like that. For beginning one or two simple quests. And one important info - people want... points. A simple quest is "do interwiki" - 2 points for each in en wiki; 4 points for interwiki in other Wikipedias linked to en wiki. It's not all -

2795:

I like the idea of a (nice) warning that one is the last watcher of an article. It could enable a useful amount of voluntary adoption. Inactive users... is it possible to use the regular re-login to identify these and trigger the Last Watcher notice?

6412:

Would it be possible to add a policy where the image uploader is notified of any lack of information so that they can have the opportunity to add it, rather than just deleting the picture and leaving the articles that use it pointing to a dead link?

5732:

I think it's better that double links persist in the HTML, but that they are camouflaged with CSS. e.g. the mediawiki software could add a 'soft' class to the anchor tag. An the CSS would suggest the user agent to render it in some shade of gray.

9292:

Even if this proposal seems a little wacky, I really believe we need to give people something better than a blank editbox to create articles with. A lot of problems are coming from the primitive, mistake-encouraging system we have in place now.

9080:

I understand your point quite well and agree with it. I'm on the fence here. On one hand I think Knowledge should maintain a strict adherence to an encyclopediac format, while on the other I want it to be a repository of all knowledge possible.

5218:

There is currently discussion regarding the phrases "Mini-series", "Maxi-series" and "Limited series", regarding their popularity, definitions and usage. If you have any opinion on the terms, please share it as we attempt to build consensus at

2470:

for misusing our resources to perpetrate a fraud that endangered the safety of minors (felony), and demanding recompensation (a very heavy one), thus setting precedent and discouraging scandal, or could be used to enforce trademarks, etc. etc.

9249:

create "junk" that requires cleanup or deletion? Do we really think they're going to read through 20 scattered guidelines before creating a page? It's only natural that, given the system we have in place, we're in the situation we're in.

9820:

If a user edits a page, and the last edit was made by him too, he should have the option (within a certain time period, say 15 minutes) to literally edit *that* item of the history, instead of creating a edition, and a new entry in history.

8067: 7672:

Pretty much the only things you have to know to get started are (1) how to generate a wiki-link (to another article) and (2) maybe add a picture. Everything else beyond that can easily be fixed later by others. And all of this is covered in

4343:

when user Foo is logged in, that would make life better. Everyone would get this feature and discussion pages would be less cluttered from the explicit span tags. (It wouldn't even require a span tag, just add another class to the <a:

3574:. I would like to stop the external link creep that seems to happen on any articles related to units of measurement. Maybe some site could be selected as the default, just like Dmoz is often used when a web directory is needed. Wikilink to 3083: 3591:

I think these edits should be rolled back as spam. In many cases, the anon replaced a link to another converter with their link. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll start removing these links, without replacing any previous link, in an hour or

3878:, who can ban and block and the like become something less than your bureaucrats, but more than an average user. I'm not sure where deletion rights come in, especially since pictures are (largely) irrecoverable. Just my three pence... -- 3508:

The order of links from article to article is inconsistent and is nearly impossible to modify because it is chosen not as a global setting, but at the whim of the people who interwiki links to articles, many of whom can't even read our

8766:

useful though: a "list all" feature in a category page's toolbox, that showed all the contents of the category: ie. including all members of sub-categories. IMHO this is a really painfully obvious omission. Eg. maybe one day I go to

8201:

Perhaps. But the incivility, blankings (over 3RR in one case), hurried archiving, and application of page protection all seem like bad form to me. We're not seeing anything like "discussion" over this. Can we at least admit that it

7810:

See http://www.wikicities.com/ Wikicities for an example of a Mediawiki site with Google ads. One good reason we might not want to use Google ads is because they impose content restrictions that would effectively censor Knowledge (see

7792:

much financial trouble yet. Not to mention that having seen other MediaWiki-based sites with them, I think Google ads would look terrible. Point 5 is also interesting, but AFAIK we prefer to internally review articles and make sure we

8635:

shape that makes it, and let the mirrors handle it however they like? Or does Knowledge have a policy of accommodating mirrors? Also, it's not like the content wouldn't be available, since the annotation would just be a summary. —

2203:

Right now, it's non-trival to use ISO 8601 in your signature. I had to modify USER/monobook.js to hack the signature button to print this, because subst:Twodigit can't appear in a raw signature (but these non-subst templates can!):

1549:

account, which will give you access to the database and allow you to forgo manually scraping the pages with a bot. The current organization may have some inherent flaws, but it'll only really be an issue if the new interface becomes

4586:

Perhaps a basement guideline of publication on notable websites and/or blogs? If a site like Something Awful links to it, when we know they have hundreds of thousands of readers, it can be safely said that it's reached a sizeable

7857:

Well we certainly wouldn't accept anything without a firm rule of no influence. Though I'm sure they'd try. Our own ad supported mirror is a possible idea to avoid the influence. In any case, something's going to have to give. -

1228:

A general link would be useful, yes, but option by option links are more likely to attract users to seek the help. Rick, I'm not sure about your suggestion: What would I hyperlink in "Mark all edits minor by default"? Would it be

5904:

1) Bandwidth usage will deter editors from including All bandwidth from streaming is absorbed by evtv1. These are external links. Bandwidth, while becoming less expensive, still costs...and that is what the commrcial subsidizes.

8119:

This expansion of ArbCom to include "officers" doesn't appear to have gotten much press. It involves someone whose job it to summarise and present the information presented into digestable packets for the Arbitration Commitee.

7201:

Great idea. Don't forget years either. Since high school and college articles are frequent vandalism targets, everyone should also watch their alma maters, or even every school in the area (or other local institutions if you're

2308:

A proposal to clarify the meaning of "Nationality" in the Manual of Style for Biographies -- should the "nationality" in the lead section normally men the person's citizenship, or the person's possibly complex ethhnic heritage.

8630:

Thanks; re MediaZilla, I was kind of wanting to float the idea here, to see if people think this is a good way to replace lists, before requesting the software change (so I can say please implement this, and we'll actually use

2212:

And it was hard just trying to discover that part. I got lucky and found several other people who had done the monobook.js hack, every last one added ISO dates (in addition to other things), and I was able to copy their code.

8771:, and see all the sailors; next day I go back, and it's been organised into sub-cats, and I have to manually and tediously browse them all just to see the same list. Has a request for this been floated before, do you know? — 8562:

lists will convert to categories. But the proposed feature would replace many, if not most, lists (which are currently mostly incomplete) with self-maintaining categories; the result being to make Knowledge more reliable. —

6367:

happened to make the week following 12/28/2005 a very good one for the Foundation. More specifically, previous fundraisers had tended to fizzle, and this one seemed to be taking a similar path until its New Year's fireworks.

9282: 5915:

4) Me unilaterally adding links... I am done doing this. I spent over 40 hours linking (what I believe to be in good faith) only to have editors delete the external links. I want to help, not fight. This is a grand project.

3377: 8588:

Thanks for the comments. As for updating all articles, no, the idea is that adding the feature wouldn't immediately change anything; but people could gradually go and change the lists into annotated categories. I would do

2437:

already blocks repetitive severe incivility (usually in conjunction with other offenses). They do so as a last resort, which I think is correct. However, a civility warning tag for user talk pages could be quite helpful.

6386:

by pre-testing different types of appeals to randomized subsets of visitors to the site. It would be great if we could have the techniques in place for remarkable success from the very beginning of the next fundraiser.

5282:

If you create an account and log in to Knowledge, you can set your preferences between several different skins. The Classic skin puts the interlanguage links at the top of the screen, which seems like what you're looking

4811:

of WP a boost when we can show them that we are not just a bunch of kids mucking about. To that end it would be a good story for the media - especially those that feature us every now and then as seen in "In the news" of

1376:

We all know that there has been a big battle about userboxes in the last few days. Things are getting pretty heated, and even starting to get ugly in some places. I wanted to make a few suggestions for keeping the peace.

6285:

that it's currently protected, and that I should click that to stop that, or vice versa? In addition, the action at the URL is &action=protect or &action=unprotect, not &action=protected. Thus, I'm going to

7272:

of quests. And it is more useful that asks for quests wherever in wikispace. All players gives points for realised quests and all quests are controled by WikiMasters. And last but not least it is very funny game. Look

1584:

Hey there everyone. I just started it up - it's just at the moment concentrating on Football news in the UK, but if people want to add to it, and expand it to other countries, and do La Liga, then that's good! Anyway,

5575:

I propose that a new kind of wiki syntax be developed so that both can be combined. The syntax for reference material might look like this <reference url="http://someurl.com" title="title of the subject" page=1:

3933:

A conversation about which editors are qualified to rule other editors against their will assumes that it can be done. That assumption is false. A thinking being, by definition, must make choices, and therefore must

3396:

Your IP address is available to anyone for all time in the page history, unless a developer erases a page's history. Making an account gives you more privacy as only developers can track your address. The now famous

7848:

other unobtrusive advertisement system. Sacrificing the integrity and values of the encyclopedia, along with a good chunk of our best contributors who don't like the idea, isn't the best way to achieve these goals.

5803:

EVTV1.com has great clips of Shirley Temple, Jack Paar, Muhammad Ali, Volcanoes, Ellis Island, and literally thousands of archival footage clips. All of the clips have rights cleared for Internet viewing worldwide.

8270:

to ask anyone ignore the underlying issue: Why again and again are things done in the most difficult way possible, in the way almost certain to raise a storm. Nothing that the clerk is going to be doing actually

7065:

We should make a Wikiproject just for coming up with ideas like this... in the end, it would be nice to have like a list of ~7 types of pages that should pick one of based on yourself and watch unconditionally. —

6452:

A more passive authority might contribute one short authority section and then be seen no more. This would still give such articles a more trustable and consistent authority, while still leaving the article open.

1773:

This is brought often enough to, in my opinion, merit its own page, discussing past discussions and current situation (there has been some discussion also in wikitech-l that is not easily accessible). Anyone for

5396:"Rollback is strictly for reverting vandalism." Never heard this in 30 months, so i don't care if it says it clearly somewhere. Make a msg saying it pop up when you hover the rvt lk, if you want it adhered to. 4407:

that this does not impose more than a trivial amount of server load. If it reguires an extra server call for every such sig when a page renders, than i think it should be prohibited unde the same logic used for

7690:

can be a daunting experience when it's full of scary markup and you have trouble even finding the text you want to change. WYSIWYG would definitely have advantages if we could do it in a way that doesn't suck.

3581:(Anyway, it's so late here that I can't investigate this particular series of edits further today. If someone can be bothered to ascertain their nature and revert them if appropriate, he'll receive my thanks.) 3113:

after the name - this seems succinct and we don't really need to know if it's a series or programme etc.. I'd also opt for replacing any that say "sitcom" with "TV" as well. Obviously, with some titles such as

7756:

It would be interesting to see if biographies and other disputable subjects could be confirmed as accurate by someone who isn't connected to the project such as a family organization, authors, or the general

1882:

these conversations lead to some interesting results, but by the time I get there my eyes have glossed over and my brain has clicked off. I propose to solve this by suggesting that people "take it outside".

3390: 7750:

I personally believe this website would benefit from Google ad technology. In my opinion, you can keep the integrity of your website and not disturb uninterested visitors while covering operating expenses.

7349:- it is still big quest - almost everybody newcomer is welcoming (without vandals of course). But pl wiki has another problems. I think it is worth to find a group of Wikipedians who want to start WikiRPG. 10052:

I propose a new one to break Anons. Since we already know the IP of the anon it is no secret what ISP they use. Known problematic ISPs such as AOL should be marked so admins dont block them for too long.

8098: 3131: 8187:

In the UK, we elect a government, and they appoint their officers. There is no popular scrutiny, as we empower the elected ones to delegate at will to thir 'administration'. I see this in the same way.

6227:

In my opinion, here is already the best place to publicize it on En - but also add links to this discussion on the talk pages for the two Mediawiki templates, and also send a mail out on the En mailing

5721:: "An article may be considered overlinked if ... a link is repeated in the same article (although there may be case for duplicating an important link that is distant from the previous occurrence);". — 4653:. I used SA as an example of a site with wide readership that often links to things that can become memes. Substitute your link aggregator or site of choice if you need to justify it, for that matter. 9336:

to propose new features... ;-) But you're absolutely right, of course, your feature has the huge advantage that it would be very simple to put in. I have a tendency to look waaaay down the road... —

8507:

would place Joshua Slocum in two category/lists, with appropriate annotations for each. This feature could also be used in categories themselves, to annotate their entries in their parent categories.

8345:

Whomever wishes to can edit the workshop pages, and that's where the real mean-and-potatoes of this effort should be going. That's where the largest amounts of noise are, and the most guidance needed.

4386:

else's) in their local monobook.css file (which would be effective when they are logged in). Seems like a frill to me, but if a developer's interested I don't think there'd be any privacy issues. --

7753:

Another idea I brainstormed was a one-time-only page that would pop up after users read a certain number of articles. A kind request for a donation and a keep doing what I was doing setup would help.

4336:

tags around my signature, in conjunction with custom CSS, to highlight my signature when I'm logged in. This makes reading discussion pages so much more awesome that I think everyone should benefit.

7643: 6768:

for more information. However, it should be noted that the use of the template is discouraged in articles; it's mainly being used for the main page and a few other prominent pages right now. Thanks!

5930:

My suggestion is for FREE VIDEO...but the cost is a :15 commercial. Is it obnoxious? I hate commercials myself. But most people would sit through :15 to see a 2 minute clip of what they want to see.

8593:, for example, in a few hours. Other "List of" pages might hang around for a year before getting converted. But yes, this would require a change to the Wiki software — if it got enough support. — 1193:

Re Proposal A: I'd prefer if a key term associated with each option were linked to the appropriate help. I'm not aware of anything else in the UI that uses linked question marks to get to help. --

5631:

I have an other idea that is more generic that just for dates. The idea is to implement that only the first occurance of a unique link on a page is rendered as a link. Example if you have the code

5199: 3531:

The problem with centralized interwiki linking is when the association is not 1-n and is n-n. No one has been able to come up with a satisfactory plan, so it has gone on the backburner for now. —

3328:

vandalize and get away with it. The obvious downside is that it slows down the editing process, but given the rate at which Knowledge is growing, I dare say that isn't necessarily a bad thing. --

6790:

appearing over the image when the mouse hovers over it, using Javascript? Without giving it much thought, that seems to be the most consistent metaphor. Better minds need to think about this...

5979:

value, as I see it, is in connecting the right clips with teh right articles. By me stepping out of the editorial process, it removes the conflict of interest and editors would decide...not me.

3125:

before I read and discovered that I should post it here, apologies. Naturally it also applies to other categories of television programmes, not just British or sitcoms, of which there are many.

8712:). The software engineer in me can't accept manually-maintained parallel data like this, and my proposal would, IMO, make it easier to replace "problem" lists with appropriate categories. — 7595:

for instance, so the user can click on an icon in the weapons grid (on the right) for a #redirect to its description. Of course, the possibilities are endless: imagine watching a picture of a

6263: 6078: 1164:

In particular, many users are switching on minor edits by default without understanding minor edits properly. IMO, I think this option should be removed, but I don't know its original intent.

9154: 7546: 5783:

I have been trying to figure a way to add video clip links to articles. My family happens to own EVTV1.com (an online video portal), British Pathe (a newsreel library), and WPA Film Library.

3091:

I've been looking at a number of pages in this and similar categories and I can't see any consistency in the labelling of programmes where there is a possible ambiguity. For example, we have

1636:

However, there is a more fundamental problem, that having to post requests for changes is a slow and unreliable process, and discourages people from making what could be constructive edits.

9765:

I've noticed that, too. I also watch out for words that are very likely to be disambiguation pages and ignore words that are almost certainly stubs. I didn't say my system was perfect. ;-)

9257:

has it right, providing them with a template instead of a blank page is a vast improvement. I propse that new users have this template added to the editbox when they create a new article:

8997: 6055: 5691:) in every major section, rather than force the reader to scroll way back searching for a definition. BTW, you should make this into a separate proposal — it's nothing to do with dates. — 4744:

What does the person actually use the encyclopedia (as opposed to the community) for (e.g. personal interest, scholarly research, boredom alleviation, technical support, product reviews...)

4348:

I use a colored background highlight; but the default could be a bold, or even no difference by default -- just make it easier to do this. I think it would be pretty trivial to implement.

2200:. This is related to the above proposal for making more dates follow preference regioning, but this is much simpler, and doesn't require a major addition to the capabilities of Knowledge. 1335:

I get the impression that this is the caching and updating of different Knowledge servers; I think MediaWiki namespace is cached differently in general, and so can take longer to catch on.

9986:

For a building process this would imply, that you add text to the article, that is not on the page itself. For a question on "why the sun is round" I could borrow data from wiki "Add text

9253:

So to fix it, I think article creation needs to be changed, at least for new users (accounts created in the last 7 days, less than 50 edits, would seem like good criteria to me). I think

3445:

This seems to be one possible way of bridging the language divide between various wikipedias. This can also help users to translate articles from one version to another without searching.

2276:

This should just be a subset of the Date preferences proposal: signature timestamps should have date preferences enabled, and even better could have timezone preferences. In the meantime

9364: 9063:, which is forbidden. It is also very difficult to make meaningful comparisons within the NPOV. Perhaps, this could be a sustainable project elsewhere, but Knowledge should not host it. 7814:, section 5, "You shall not...display any Ad(s)...on any Web page or any Web site that contains any pornographic, hate-related, violent, or illegal content"). No comment on other points. 7653: 5912:

3) Watching a documentary on Google video is great...there should be a link to it IF THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN CORRECTLY LICENSED. That is why I stuck to material that I was sure was clear.

4047: 3964: 3955: 9982:

Allowing users to ask questions would enable contributors to redefine them to be "as exact as possible" and also answer those that are most likely to be asked and link them to wikipedia.

9059:, which means each article should (ideally) be a descriptive exposition on a single tangible topic. Choosing comparisons to write about is inherently arbitrary and the content would be 1899:

Someone; a participand in the exchange, or even the person making the suggestion; copies the conversation to an existing talk page, or creates a new sub-page of the current conversation.

9987: 9682:

I was thinking the system could check if a target is in Category:Disambiguation (or subcategory I suppose). More work for the cpu, but it's only on previewing, not normal browsing. —

6734:

images link to their description page and some not - better would be for most images to not link anywhere, and to link to the image description page in some other more explicit manner.

5244:

how about a new row of tabs at the TOP of the article, below the current tabs? Besides being more intuitive, you wouldn't have to scroll (on lower resolution screens) to get to them. --

3910:

I'm afraid this is missing the point. By far the most controversial admin actions involve deletion or short blocks. But there have been some proposals for an "intermediate layer", e.g.

3625: 3578:

might do, but a JavaScript converter has its benefits. WikiConversion, anyone? Other ideas? Maybe this issue has already been talked to death, but I can't find the discussion anywhere?

9186:

generals. It's just a natural thing to do within the context of an existing article. That said, having separate articles could help to avoid redundancy and maintenance problems where

8978:

This is not a page that a "ordinary" editor can alter. You would need to get some consensus for your proposed changes and then a more privileged user may make the changes you desire.

2978:

All right then, let's see. First, the answer to the most recent question; these proposals don't do much unless someone files a feature request, which has been done in this case - see

2921:

Bah. I suppose one vandal could watch a page, and then that page would be removed from the unwatchedpages list, and then they would be able to write whatever crap on it they want to.

1505: 1241:? Really it's the entire statement we want help on. In terms of new users looking at their prefs who might not be familiar with Knowledge's style of linking keywords, I think that a ( 6634:

might be a good idea, where the list is cleaned by admins and they right "LIST EMPTY" in the edit summary or so forth. Does a page like this already exist? Any input anyone? Thanks!

3714:

Agreed. "Died" is a fact (i.e. they're no longer living; although obviously that can be up to interpretation), whereas "passed away" has connotations of rememberance and memorials.--

2883:

Agreed. Vandals often don't create accounts simply because they don't have to and it makes it harder to ban them. If there were a compelling reason to create an account, they would.

7479:

be divided into users and indefinantly blocked/vandal accounts. This would provided better navigation on the list of users and would help better identify vandal accounts. Thoughts?

1757: 6709:

page. The text next to it says "Please visit our sister project, Wikinews...", and most people would instinctively assume that the graphic was a hotlink to Wikinews. But it isn't.

5846:

As for your proposal, I'm not sure it makes sense. Linking to "uncopyrighted" materials is pretty a much a nonissue: copyright is automatic, and if it's not copyrighted, then it's

3585: 6754:

take you directly to the Wikinews home page. I changed this myself last week - let me know if it's not working for you. To accomplish the linking of pages from images, we can use

3831:

I'm not convinced that we actually have a problem here, but there's no harm in at least discussing our options. Hence, I yield the floor to people's ideas, thoughts and opinions.

1730:

work. I don't know how technically feasible this is (seems like it would have a very different paradigm for handling data), but I still think it's a good idea. What you think? -

8309:

comment to the ArbCom as a whole. A former ArbCom member seems well-suited to the task, since he or she already knows the workings of the group, but anyone could do it or help. -

3820:(see the thread on "Worthy Admins", and to a lesser extent "Abuse of Power" and "admin violations again"). The two main ideas suggested there are 1) applying higher standards to 9719:

If you set your stub display to an appropriate level, you'll see most disambiguation pages as stubs. Some actually will be stubs, but you can often tell which ones they are. --

8536:

Thanks for the comment; the idea would be to design categories that replace the lists; so if the list isn't too big to read, then the category wouldn't be either. For example,

5873:

I strongly agree with your idea. I was going to suggest it myself. Now, with Google Video searching so many videos, and people like yourself willing to donate their collections.

5006:. Such a function could help the welcoming committee welcome new users and the anti-vandalism people to better find serial vandals, insult users, sockpuppets and impersonators. 10021: 8136: 7527: 4257:

GPL. I've contacted FSF, and included references to this discussion about the issue, so let's see what they come up with. If that takes over 7 days, I suggest this is moved to

9889:

serialized object, which has a gzipped serialized array of revisions, keyed by the hash. I lost track of the number of indirection layers. The compression code seems to be at

9056: 7505: 1492: 7536:

used have an edit link for the lead section. I don't understand why it was removed; it's clearly much more sensible than adding "&section=0" to the end of an edit URL.

2528:

It seems your legal defense project is also designed to get Knowledge to go on the legal offense. I disagree with this as a goal of the Wikimedia Foundation. As for actual

2247:

Would that mean I will always see the date like in your signature? Since I am European my brain really likes it that I see the date as 9 januari 2006. Instead of 2006-01-08.

8973: 3263: 6417: 6275: 6206: 6183: 6147: 6116: 5509:"The classification, subject headings, and bibliographic records in Classification Web that originate with the Library of Congress are copyrighted, except within the USA." 10117: 10028: 8423: 7452:

of that quest on pl wiki ;). So, about sort - if you want :) (but maybe without comments ;) We have on pl wiki local tally on every quest's page and global Hall of Fame.

5479: 4578: 4527:

could customize how their own links appear)? I'm fine with that, but I don't really see the point, like Rick Block. The developers have much bigger issues to deal with.

3611:

amount in 2005 USD and the reader would have a facility to easily convert it to any currency in any year. Maybe someone should propose this feature at Mediawiki Bugzilla.

3561: 2457:

I have proposed a WikiProject to organise users to form legal efforts to aid Knowledge, as I am concerned eventually the need will be very great in the future. This is at

1568: 9950:

Oh right. Do you mean that all the different text from all revisions is stored in the text table, and the object picks out the relevant parts from that scramble of text?

8301: 7729: 5097: 5058: 8548:

already exists. The difference is that the category will maintain itself; if I add a new island, it won't automatically appear in the list, but it will in the category.

4577:

Some sort of basement Google guideline, perhaps. The problem with this is threefold - Google is biased toward newer memes, allowing older yet notable memes (like, say,

3155: 1532: 1516: 1297: 1293: 5876:

I am currently watching a documentary that is freely available from Google Video. These clips could easily be included in an article with alittle bit of style changing

4230:

parts of the sourcecode, including the part that makes the interface. Exception can be if it uses something like Microsoft Windows features to draw a picture on screen.

3332: 2587: 2565: 2545:

Natalina, if you want to discuss the possiblity of taking legal action on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation or its projects, the place for that discussion is probably

10105: 9662: 9110: 8994: 8982: 6407: 3824:

voting (but note that nominees are already held to substantially higher standards than actual admins) or 2) creating a process for de-adminship (but note that several

1959: 1736: 1714: 9954: 9848: 9828: 9289:

Also, a bot could easilly be run to remove this template from pages older than 24 hours or so, since beyond article creation it would just be clutter in an article.

8958:

mabe a lot of theses people have posted their articles here because of the same reason(i did once(about a comparison of unix subsystem under windows(sfu,cygwin...)))

8832: 8610:

do not implement categories and to make the content as easily accessible as possible this should not be required (which would lead to a preference not to provide any

8597: 8329:

to need some official way of identifying those users the Arbcom trusts, we might as well mention that these guys are also trusted to properly write up evidence, etc.

8313: 8286: 8217: 7011: 6303: 5708: 4215: 3282: 3162: 2986:

is accompanied by a separate permission setting. As to the automatic addition to watchlists, again, there might be those who argue against that. Note that there is a

2847: 2553: 2117:

ability to see what the community thinks about a specific question and its something to add to the main page...'poll of the day'. Love to hear the communities ideas.

8906: 8863: 8582: 8514: 7775: 7628: 7592: 6391: 5230: 3483: 3360: 2872: 9176: 8567: 8396: 8374: 8337: 8107: 8092:

I really appreciate any help we can get; i can only see the portal getting wikinews more hits, and making the footy portal get more contributors! Tergards, muchly;

7252: 7122: 7072: 6342: 5434:

b) Sadly, it's probably not practical to roll out on any major scale. Very time-consuming, pretty complex to operate (you'd be amazed), and a proprietary system...

3802: 3405: 2254: 2136: 1944: 1902:

Just enough of the beginning of the thread is kept on the original page to convey what the exchange is about. It gets linked to the new location of the discussion.

10015: 9944: 8749: 8639: 8625: 8614:, like annotations, using categories). I don't know whether this is actually a consideration in the design of the category feature, but it certainly could be. -- 8530: 8176: 8153: 7221: 7109: 6845: 6719: 5864: 5464:

I wouldn't go the list route it is very maintiance intensive. It would also be wrong to cluter up the category system this way. It would need a different system.--

5451: 4877: 4649:

The problem is that WP:WEB doesn't really do a great job covering it. It's not like a meme is something that's visited regularly or offers new content like, say,

3294: 3073:

Well, vandals could see which pages are unwatched. And then they could add that page to their watchlist, so the page is no longer flagged on the "Recent Changes."

2523: 8262:

doing things that re-enforce the appearance (at the very least) of an "old boy's" network, we'll keep having problems with "hysteria". The facts that the ArbCom

8253: 6892: 6011: 4672: 3699: 3369: 2953: 2925: 2857: 2734: 1784: 9969:

question. The wikiQuestion would allow posting questions and wiki editing. Every wiki page would be linked by keywords to wikipedia and all other similar pages.

8786: 8775: 8737: 8716: 8686: 8666: 8245:

were thrown out the window. Frankly, Kelly deserves a medel for putting up with all this crap, instead she is given a thankless job to do. And the problem is? --

7068: 7007: 6860:

to find its density would give you this info right away. There would have to be an ongoing effort to add these boxes to the articles about different compounds.

6338: 6271: 6259: 6202: 6143: 6112: 6074: 6007: 5860: 5365: 5347: 4976: 4156: 4130: 4120: 4097: 4087: 3971: 3798:

I agree with the main point; and I think a MoS addition would be appropriate. But running a bot on articles for a stylistic issue like this wrong, I believe. —

3533: 3479: 3290: 3197: 2868: 2540: 2234: 2232:

I'm sure that this reqest has been made before, but I agree wholeheartedly. Unfortunantely, I don't feel strongly enough to do my signatures the way you do... —

2166: 2132: 1955: 1780: 1720: 1710: 1690: 1614: 1564: 50: 10082:

This could be extended to include all ISPs. Anon accounts provide us with the IP under the current system and IPs can be whoised and would reval the IPs ISP. --

9345: 9327: 9313: 7179: 6999: 6549: 6243: 6101: 6088: 5287: 4925: 3943: 3605: 3596: 3537: 3449: 3303: 3067: 2446: 2238: 1618: 1451: 9643: 9132:

In my opinion, Knowledge should have lots of pages like these for controversial issues, in order to capture the full depth of each side. This doesn't violate

8438: 8196: 7095: 6047: 4980: 4921:) if there's anything I can do. Publishing the whole results is a bit more complicated, but we're knee-deep in analyzing the data and writing up the results.-- 4668:, but that there's any question of its actual notability is rather disturbing, and WP:WEB certainly doesn't do the trick in terms of a useful approximation. -- 4468: 4397: 3769: 3754: 3738: 3417: 3383: 2458: 1972: 10099: 8948:

why: because most of the website use e-mail for submiting password and procedures are quite long and so we need to show that it's very fast and convenient...

8818: 8806: 7623:

I've long wanted something like this. I've tried a few tricks to try and get such image maps, but all are quite cumbersome. One example in use can be seen at

7139: 7086: 7047: 6327: 5168: 4840: 4450: 4418: 3709: 3141: 3051: 3034: 3016: 3003: 2971: 2178: 1750: 1528:

may visit it for the purposes of finding those AFDs that no one was really paying attention to, so that having such a list actually aids in their detection.

1401:

too, BTW), you consider subst'ing userboxes? I know it makes for a mess of code, but at least you're less likely to have to deal with deletions on your page.

1322:

Of the two links I made, sometimes one is there, sometimes the other. I have not seen them together yet. Perhaps this is still some caching issue, or a bug.--

1283: 1204: 9396: 8348:

As to "trusted effort" the evidence pages are (by convention) edit-only-your-own areas. Anyone "trusted" can just put their tid-bits of summarised evidence

7293: 7148: 6876: 6828: 6765: 6538: 6505: 6429: 5955: 5753:

is a proposal for simple injunctions against lesser disruptions, that do not reach the level of the ArbCom. Please take a look and comment on the talk page.

5725: 5695: 5443: 5344: 5299: 5273: 5263: 4922: 4669: 4601: 3727: 3632: 3615: 3464: 3398: 3329: 2941: 2910: 2786: 2350: 2077: 1984: 1427: 10088: 9723: 9686: 9673: 9071: 9029: 8047: 7986: 7680: 7162: 7031: 5737: 5534: 5520: 5185: 5139: 4581:

to fall by the wayside, and Google doesn't always catch what some users might incorrectly call "forumcruft" like Rapter Jesus, and Google is english-biased.

4284: 4268: 4186: 4029: 3928: 3555: 3186: 3077: 2058: 2031: 1868: 1845: 1481: 9897: 9838: 9834:

As far as I know, the software compresses older revisions in such a way this isn't a problem (that caused the old, long fixed, "block compression bug"). --

9245:

Right now, we are just giving people a blank page and saying "Have fun!" This really seems to be at the root of the problem. How can we expect people to

9163: 8726:

to get a list of all articles in a a particular category and insert them into or merge them with a list -- there is automated software for doing this (see

8579: 7834: 7771: 7663: 7410: 6918: 6030: 5667:

Also, there are some occurrences where you would want it linked multiple times. And putting in an override might make it more trouble than it's worth. --

5468: 5459: 5270: 5248: 5245: 4884: 4863: 4689:

to get an idea of who we all are? The site has come a long way in a short time and I think it is high time to gather some information about the community.

4198:. For an image, that means that the binary and the source code are the same thing. (This would also be the case for, e.g. interpreted computer languages). 3783: 3387: 3346:

lot or copying the desired sections to another program like 'Word'. It would make the task alot easier if, say, there were check boxes (i'm not an expert)

3203: 3194: 2682: 2559: 1413: 1358: 1341: 1326: 1315: 1304: 1263: 1219: 9704: 9596: 9384: 9374: 7618: 7576: 7020: 6782: 6665: 5880: 3793: 2824: 2800: 2666: 2147: 2089: 9561: 9527: 9447: 9429: 9195: 9015: 7818: 7555: 6694: 6586: 6546: 6432: 6336:(answering own question) It lasted three hours. I'm going to re-breach the subject on the Administrator's Noticeboard. Thanks for prompt notification. — 5967: 5890: 5828:

Define what you mean by "uncopyrighted material". If you mean "material in the public domain" then you'll need further explanation of your statement. (

5663:

I agree with this spirit of this, but in practice, it might not be such a good idea. It's kind of counterintuitive and it would throw some people off.

5657: 5490: 4749:

out the census put through foundation-i and maybe even on user pages. The census of course would not be obligatory but reccomended (as with donations).

4604: 4315: 3866:" and that they are no different from regular editors is... disingenuous, to say the least. Either the name should probably be changed - for instance, a 3518: 2887: 2766: 2753: 2620: 2573: 2428: 2040: 9795:, an attempt to encourage and facilitate successful featured article candidacies and peer reviews for articles on musicians and bands. You can help by 8544:. This would be replaced by a category, "Islands of Honduras", which would be a member of category "Islands of Central America". In fact, I note that 8075:

Now, I require 2 people - One for coca cola league 1, and another for coca cola league 2 to maintain the results, fixtures and upcoming matches section.

7952: 7904: 7744:

A more user friendly main page with icons (I like the new proposed main pages with the icons on top) would be less intimidating to novice and new users.

7456: 7376: 7363: 7300: 6818: 6492: 6478: 5618: 5604: 5406: 4910: 3899: 3889: 3856: 2491: 1187: 9815: 9652: 9621: 9488: 9456: 9420: 9025:

and its "archiving" methods. If this page changes its way, those will all follow, I would guess. Have you asked this question in the talk page, there?

8038: 7943: 7895: 7430: 7393: 6534:

Nor would the authority necessarily have to be an 'expert' on the subject - a concientious user, with reasonable composition skills would be enough. --

6354: 5678: 5555: 5545: 5125: 4937: 4644: 4295: 4057: 2266: 1764: 1462: 9769: 9744: 9497: 7862: 7852: 7694: 7635: 6978: 6949: 6940: 6794: 3845: 2315: 2103: 9618: 7983: 7226: 6738: 6463: 6084:

I suggest simply "protection". As a noun, this doesn't suggest any particular action, and it's much briefer in a place where every character counts.

1821: 1142:

As a recent admin, I now have the ability to edit the MediaWiki namespace. Nonetheless, I assumed procedure was to bring such changes up here first.

9297: 8553:

Also, note "(optionally) include annotations" above; ie. you would be able to choose between a conventional category view, and one with annotations.

6995:

if regular users added their own birthday to their watchlists and nothing more, these edits would be discovered and fixed more efficiently. thanks,

4936:

If I type something into the searchbox at wikipedia, and wikipedia doesn't have it but there's something on wiktionary, a link to it would be nice.

3312: 2305: 1391: 3172: 2017: 1424: 9127:. It has an interesting history; people can't agree on what should be included or how material should be presented. This month it's been gutted. 7714: 4940: 4535: 4380: 2728:

Obviously, this isn't perfect, (eg. rogue users), but it could help a lot, since many people forget to watch pages, and many pages are unwatched.

1311:

Note that here HTML is needed, wikisyntax does not work. Note also that it seems to take some time to become effective, I suppose due to caches.--

10095: 10084: 10072: 9592:

I think it needs to be commented out... otherwise we'd end up with tons of articles where the phrases weren't removed, and looked quite junky. --

8922: 8108: 7937:

with Google's (or Yahoo! ...). It's good usability practice to allow such familiarity to transfer across different websites (incl. Knowledge). -

7212:, this topic will soon vanish from here. Where do we need to document this suggestion so that more people see it? Part of the "welcome kit"? — 6565: 5598: 5213: 4555: 3322: 2982:. Second, watchlists are considered somewhat private, and there are qualms about even statistical-type things relating to them, hence the reason 2853:

Why not make it available to only logged in users? The vast majority of vandals are not registered; and most wouldn't even know about that page.

1998: 1927: 9807: 2602:

on the Recent Changes page. Sure, this might encourage "wiki-stalking", but this would somewhat help against vandals. What do you guys think? --

9907:

table contain? The text of a few key revisions? And the serialised object contains keys indicating which lines to pick out of those revisions?

9593: 9524: 9444: 9381: 9324: 9294: 8780:

I agree that such a feature would be quite useful. I do not recall seeing it proposed before. I wouldn't think it would be hard to implement.

7659:

I disagree. There are links to help on editing near the submission button, and i find wiki markup to be MUCH easier than using word processors

6650: 4775: 4559: 3570:

were replaced. Unless I didn't get the memo and convertplus.com is now the official unit conversion partner of Knowledge, this seems much like

3279: 2688: 1885:

Taking it outside would mean moving the conversation off the page and finding a new home for it. I have tried this sort of arrangement at the

1602: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 9979:

Making search would be easier, since the keywords are always based on the question and not on the contents, which means more accurate results.

8457:. This list totally fails to mention some extremely prominent sailors, and of course needs to be manually maintained to keep it in sync with 5786:

I have also been in the home video business for over 20 years. EVTV1 has secured the rights to video clips from over 20 home video companies.

4620: 9483: 9415: 8444: 8033: 7938: 7890: 7650: 7480: 7448:

put only links to logged users, not IP. And - maybe it is quest for 2 WikiMasters on en wiki... This is hardy work for WikiMaster. Look for

6501:

Currently, "authority" is provided by verifiable references added to articles and coherent arguments provided on article discussion pages. --

5988: 5934: 5887: 5816: 5390: 5329: 3425: 2642: 2497:

I can't see how it would be possible to sue a user. Who would bring the case foward? Who would have the compensation? Who would go to court.

1650:

Certainly, speaking as a non-admin myself, I just don't bother with trying to get changes into protected pages because it's too much hassle.

1172:

But this isn't sufficient for the minor edits problem, and we also need a link on the edit page: "This is a minor edit" should be "This is a

671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 7353: 7285: 6488:

more flexible articles. You would have a section you could "trust", and a section which should be regarded as interesting but unreliable. --

6094:

is fine but I don't feel "protect"/"protection" is as informative as "protect"/"unprotect". Given these options, I prefer the status quo. —

5572:

problems, Item 1) doesn’t give enough detail about the reference and item 2) forces the user to jump to a different section of the article.

5036: 4474:

Rick Block understood my proposal correctly and rephrased it better; there is no privacy concern. Also as violet/riga understood, it would

1827:

Bump, This has generated a little talk, but not enough to form a concensus. Please take a minute to comment if you feel one way or another.

9223:

proposal, which delegates such arguments to a working version that is not considered "official" while the stable version remains reliable.

6900: 5832: 4831:

edit count and some aggregate, time resolved editing metric should be included for quality control and validation purposes. User:Ceyockey (

4490: 4359: 3640: 3566:

Links to unit converter websites seem to slowly multiply for no particular reason, but sometimes there are more rapid changes. Just today,

2775:

I saw someone claim the other day that 70% of articles are unwatched. It's a wonder we stop as much vandalism as we do, at that rate... --

2288: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 7500: 5991: 5937: 5819: 5767: 2606: 10076: 9890: 9796: 9741: 9701: 9453: 9224: 9192: 7849: 7815: 7805: 7691: 7615: 7360: 7268:

It is old proposal, but I suppose hardly nobody knows that this project in pl wiki is very very fine. More than 40 Players, more than 30

7017: 6986: 6946: 6915: 6735: 6475: 6240: 6085: 5542: 5487: 5425: 5260: 5147: 5122: 5115: 4887: 4866: 4292: 4127: 4094: 4054: 3896: 3853: 3780: 3612: 3515: 3350: 3309: 3118:

where there are no ambiguities then just leave them as they are - I'm not trying to make this more confusing, I'm trying to simplify it.

2884: 2750: 2100: 1981: 1624: 10009: 9123: 8087:

you don't need an explicit knowledge of football, you just need to know about how league tables work, and what days to update the table

7607: 7567: 7232: 5750: 5595: 5353: 5154:

This is a gauge of community opinion on admin accountability, RFA, power abuse, and deopping. Not a policy proposal. Opinions welcome.

4434: 4426: 4340: 3954: 7720:

I don't think there's a current guideline for sections of band articles - although it seems like a good idea - but start by reviewing

5687:

I think this issue is best handled as part of the MoS. For example, in a big article, I tend to wikilink something non-obvious (like

5584: 4824: 2336: 1889:. Conversations start on the main page, and when they do, I move the entire converstaion to the talk page, and create a link to it. 1743: 1587:

if anyone follows football, either for their team, or in general in the UK, and is reading this, then PLEASE CONTRIBUTE to the portal!

8384:

to be people whose advice should generally be listened to WRT arbcom matters -- not a whole segregated class of their own, above the

6643: 6474:

instead, which does not protect any portion of the editable, working version but does protect the stable version from modification.

6072:

the protection level (from semiprotection to full protection, for example). If there are no objections, I will be bold and do it. —

5923:

these video clips, but cannot download them for distribution. The links to the site would not violate copyright, that was my point.

3813:

an admin can basically ignore all that and do whatever s/he pleases, and only in outrageous cases does the ArbCom put a stop to it.

3645: 3473:

Well, the differences are 1) maybe never noticed the interlang links and thus wants them more prominent, 2) wants to centralize the

2382: 1800: 9035: 6442:

Just an idea - the central problem with wikipedia is how to keep the editing open while at the same time preserving the best copy.

6039:

Adding videos or links to videos to articles can be helpful, at times, and materials not protected by copyright can be uploaded to

4516: 4512: 4504: 3122: 2006: 8519:

intresting idea, but it would make it much harder to read thru categories - some of them are very big as it is without notations.

6924:

I agree; but I think it's already written in many places (no pun intended). Clarifing that posting requests to discuss something

4955: 4897: 3872:

with a somewhat smaller set of abilities (no banning, but rollback and move, for example) would truly be "no big deal". Then your

1704:. You can still request changes via the talk page of the article... I don't think such streamlining is necessary. If the topic is 9800: 9628: 9227: 7766: 6558: 5626: 4261:

or a more appropriate place. Since there was no replys to my previous comment, I felt I had to clarify and change bits of it. --

4209: 4150: 4114: 4081: 1799:

I propose changing the mediawiki boiler text for anon talk pages, along with a suggestion to add lookup information. Please see

7747:

It is hard to find other wikimedia sites as I don't see any links to them in a sidebar, something many people are familiar with.

1980:"take it outside" after the fact, copying the content to a subpage and summarizing it on the talk page. Hooray for refactoring. 1469:

because some vandals have made attack pages. It just doesn't make sense (But then again, this isn't the place to discuss that).

8988: 7449: 6850: 6002: 4857: 3743:

Thanks for the support. So, any thoughts on getting bot-assisted replacement going? (Not that I'd know how to do it myself.)

3193:

Sounds good. Help things look neater, but might just end up with lots of redirects from (tv) to (television). I'd vote for it.

2121: 67: 9855: 9824:

This would save lots of hard disk space, I imagine, since editions with bad spelling mistakes don't have to be saved to data.

5450:

I don't know how it'd go, but it can't hurt if you have a go so long as it doesn't disrupt wikipedia. Maybe do something like

2715:

If you are the (last person XOR creator) watching an article, you receive a warning and confirmation if you try to un-watch it

1249:) is doable as well; while not as neat, it is more user-friendly and also closer to wikipedia's norms elsewhere (things like ( 8606:. There have been a variety of proposals to extend the categorization syntax. One argument against doing this is that many 8372: 8299: 8284: 8215: 8174: 8134: 7599:

and being able to click through to articles on the different characters depicted by clicking on them or using a picture of a

5951:. So unfortunately, while your offer is truely truely generous, it is not of as much use to us as it might seem upfront. :-( 3474: 3151: 2934:

Isn't it possible to enforce some criteria for looking at Special:Unwatchedpages? Like the criteria for the arbcom election.

2191: 1137: 9867: 5220: 4967: 4778:

by knowing where we are strong and where we need work (in terms of areas of expertise, geographic spread, and demographics).

87: 9859: 6382:

Maybe additional data, tests, or experiments could help in future planning. Specifically, I would suggest that we conduct

5987:

saying I will do this as soon as teh community agrees (and tells me where to put the links and descriptions of the clips).

3734:

Note that in some cases where the article is based on a old, out-of-copyright article, the usage has just been preserved -

2546: 2221:

the signature date around and mentally widen the gap between the time and the day, while I have no such trouble with ISO. —

7278: 6936:

However, proposals should be discussed in one place, possibly with requests to discuss elsewhere, as JesseW suggested. --

9479: 9323:

would be great, but as I'm not a developer I feel reluctant to propose stuff that might not be feasable to impliment. --

9266:'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is  7779: 6960: 5238: 5148: 3807: 2390: 2300: 5194: 4904: 9236: 8537: 8162:. Also, despite your sarcasm and an odd spree of comment blanking and page protections by various parties, this issue 7563: 6619:

where you can get the attention of admins to help with assorted matters. I would gladly help in designing such a page.

6437: 5793:

The video clips have a :15 commercial in front of the clips. That subsidizes the streaming and licensing of the clips.

5674: 5527: 3567: 1792: 1368: 83: 45: 40: 17: 5894:

clips. We have the right to stream them. That is our license and we can stream them for an infinite amount of streams.

9976:

First of all question needs an answer and if question is a combination of sciences, then the answer must be the same.

6684: 6449:

An active authority would integrate interesting contributions in the rest of the article into the authority section.

5580:

Good, Bad? I don’t know but the current reference material in all of wiki needs work. Let me know what you think. --

3441:

The article automatically lists the same article in various language wp (if it finds a match) according to page size.

3246: 2452: 2216:

The benefits of ISO 8601 are numerous. The mere fact that it scans left-to-right is a huge plus IMO. We're already

1161:) links next to each applicable preference, linking to either pages on Knowledge or Meta that describe that feature. 57: 4195:

Actually, the term "source code" is defined in the GPL as "the preferred form of the work for making changes in it"

9792: 8648:

have a general policy of accomodating and encourigign mirrors, provided that tney are propeorly compliant with the

8085:

If anyone wishes to help, or knows anybody who would like to; then please get stuck in, or get in contect with me;

6969: 6422: 6232: 6110:

Hmm... but unprotect is just so darn misleading. I'll try to think of a short alternative... but it's difficult. —

4541: 3668: 2343: 2055: 1862: 1839: 1815: 1579: 6363:

together. Comparing this most recent fundraiser to the two earlier fundraisers in 2005, it seems very clear that

4372:

It's a privacy violation. Currently, there's no way to tell whether someone's online, only when the last edited.

8020: 7885: 6945:

To clarify, what we want to do is try to keep all of the discussion about a single posting in a single location.

6831:

link above and found that this has been discussed before (see under the 'Confusing' subheading). There is also a

6383: 6360: 6176:, you should definitely publicize the change, since it is likely to create a good deal of confusion otherwise. — 5998: 5206: 4731:

Most frequent activity on WP (check-box list including: RC patrol, research, minor edits, welcoming committee...)

3911: 3226: 2434: 1498: 35: 9144:

quite extensively; there are many other more important issues that should receive the same level of attention.

8573:

Me thinks it's a great idea, but it will be a pain to update all articles. Plus, this is something that must be

7359:

What can players do with the points? Who judges whether quests were completed with sufficient quality and care?

2208:—] @ {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}–{{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}–{{subst:Twodigit {{subst:CURRENTDAY}}}} {{subst:CURRENTTIME}}Z 9786: 9141: 6569:

proposal, a proposal which would give good contributors, who are not admins, access to the rollback privilege.

5704:

I've taken the liberty of placing this proposal under its own heading, so it gets the attention it deserves. —

5174:

Please note that additional questions have been added to this straw poll, if you went and visited it early. --

4323: 2959:

You usually have to go elsewhere for implementation. Because I like the idea, I did some of the legwork. See

94: 8449:

I'm sure this is old news, but it seems to me like many WP "List of XXX" pages are unhelpful. Case in point:

5501:

is not restricted, a "List of LC classifications" page (or pages) could link to similar Knowledge categories.

4439:

This wouldn't change the wiki-source for a sig, just the HTML that would be generated by the wikisource ]. --

4004:, released under the GPL. Thus, it is believed that this image is a derivate work, and is also covered by the 1708:

controversial, it's better not to get the sysops involved with issues of moderation (that's for consensus). —

8970: 7345: 6582: 6236: 2572:

Please consider this, as the policy as it is now has done nothing in terms of preventing vandalism so far. --

1908:

The people involved continue to discuss whatever it is, as long as they want or until they reach a consensus.

10063:

Problematic ISP anon aka User:AOL 1.2.3.4 (if IP is in the known aol ranges which can be aquired by a whois)

7372:

WikiMaster is the person, who judges players and enter players (with their points) on a list (Hall of Fame)

10110:

That would be great. Such as French Alphabet/Latin or Gothic Language Alphabet/Gothic, Arabic, etc, etc...

9492: 9452:

I hate to sound even more cynical, but I'd be surprised if many editors have ever read even that text. :-)

9424: 9173: 9107: 8545: 8042: 7947: 7899: 4931: 4813: 2629: 1701: 62: 8032:, advanced search options, as well as a page for using Google, Yahoo, and other external search engines. - 4656:

The issue, of course, is that coverage in external media is a very poor way to judge the notability of an

4196: 3365:

And if you highlight the text you want you can choose the print selection option in Firefox and IE IIRC. -

1915:

I'm not sure we have to create any policy to do this, but I would like to hear what people think of this.

9940:). Which of these revisions to pick is selected by a key contained within the first serialized object. -- 8607: 8541: 7721: 7562:

There are a couple of user scripts that add a tab to edit section 0. General scripting information is at

7080: 6961: 6725:

Image description pages need to be accessible, but maybe linking the image isn't the best way. This is a

5307: 5003: 4205: 4146: 4110: 4077: 1886: 6626:

could be used for that, but it doesn't really seem it can. Besides, considering the ammount of edits to

3895:

as 24 hour blocks, which are more than sufficient for most vandalism - anything worse can be escalated.

1385:

userboxes instead of speedying them. And please make sure it's clear on the talk pages what's going on.

1145:

I feel that the preferences include an extraordinary lack of detail as to what the options do. Help can

9740:

I sometimes see dab pages this way, but some dab pages have gotten longer than some complete articles.

9213: 6865: 6180: 6098: 4423:

Again, I don't think the proposal is being understood correctly. I think the sentence above that says

4005: 2462: 2277: 1793: 1665:

style application of differences, so that edits can be independently moderated if they are orthogonal.

86:. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either 7929: 6313:

the next time (also note that it has a recent thread stating "please don't edit MediaWiki messages").

5665:"Dammit, I can plainly see in the code that it has square brackets, but it's not being linked! WTF?!" 4883:

Fine idea, but who would write the "questionaire"? Also, isn't this a proposal better suited to meta?

4734:

How did person initially find WP(again, list includng: friend, google hit, other search engine hit...)

1646:

a requested change may be missed because there is no systematic way for suggestions to be incorporated

9220: 8370: 8297: 8282: 8213: 8172: 8132: 7624: 7468: 7274: 7261: 6578: 6471: 6359:

To see in more detail how the recent fund drive went, I started looking at the raw data and put some

5775: 5594:. When you jump down to a section at the bottom, the ^ sign brings you right back to where you were. 2593: 1876: 8877: 5943:

I think your offer is really cool. However, the objective of wikipedia is to provide the world with

5121:

Er, we have that, but with a less stupid interface. Just use the radio buttons on the history page.

3549:

articles on aspects of the combination. A singel code for each subject is not useful in such cases.

2838:

is unavailable to non-admins. Why? Concern that vandals would deliberately target unwatched pages. —

9411: 8967: 7236: 7120: 5530:

and the links there, which presently contain links to Knowledge articles rather than categories. (

4437:, then by changing xer monobook.css file user Foo could highlight these links when xe is logged in. 3455:

How is this substantially different from the interlanguage links found in the toolbar on the left?

1905:

Anyone reading the original discussion can choose to follow the link and join in on the discussion.

1608:

This seems to be more appropriate for the news section. Anyway, you can wikify the link like this:

7281:. It is now not only game but work too - work in WikiFactory!. MetaWikiMaster ;) of WikiFaktoria. 3667:

I started to edit some pages manually, based on Google search results, but stopped when I saw the

2949:

So, how do these proposals actually get accepted/denied? All I notice is an auto-archive thing...

9407: 9340: 9308: 9170: 9104: 8901: 8858: 8352:

as opposed to the mailing list. Unless what the clerk will be sending to the mailing list isn't

7700: 7216: 7104: 5997:

Your first statement "to offer information free to the public" is incorrect, unfortunantely. See

5745: 5105: 4546:

I would like to see us have some sort of guideline in place regarding internet memes, similar to

3656:

direct quotation and where directly relevant to what's being discussed, e.g. in articles such as

3497:

Every version of an article on every Knowledge must redudantly list all other versions. When the

2906: 2843: 7706:

agree with the last, how do we go about creating that? A bot? Or would this be too complicated?

7475:

I have a suggestion that I would like to bring up and get some opinions on. I am proposing that

6807:

Why not link to the image page from the little expanding box icon that appears when you include

5812:

If it does, please let me know. Thousands of articles might benefit by adding visual resources.

10036: 8963: 8873: 7740:

Hello everyone. I was brainstorming some ideas for Knowledge and this is what I came up with:

6907: 6873: 6068:

system message from "Unprotect" to "Change protection", as a resulting action from the tab can

5343:. But I think that there is some discussion about making this feature available for all users. 4200: 4141: 4105: 4072: 3760: 3230: 2983: 2960: 2835: 2719: 2487: 1630: 29: 8068:

Football (Association Football) League Fixture Maintainers required (coca cola league 1&2)

6653:, which lists the various reasons why you might want admin assistance and how best to get it? 4917:

As one of the organizers of that study, I'd be glad to report some basic demographics. Just (

4786: 3477:, 3) wants to have the list sorted by size. Each of these is a proposal in their own right. — 2598:

There should be an option for "watching" users. Basically, edits by watched users will appear

9403: 9400: 9137: 8792: 8525: 8249: 8192: 7735: 7711: 7174: 6177: 6095: 5413: 5227: 4999: 4765: 4713: 3748: 3693: 3159: 3084:

Where disambiguation is needed for TV programmes, can we standardise to (TV) after the title?

2979: 2695: 2513: 2418: 2073: 2063:.. .. if you really think that's worthwhile, provide links to another website. or something. 1938: 1684: 1449: 7982:

have a news search with category filters, for doing research. This would be a nice option.

4573:

With that said, I don't know what we need to do to get there, but I do have a couple ideas:

3103:

and other synonyms such as "show" or "programme". There are also some labelled as "sitcom".

2866:

The real nutty/persistent vandals, however, are registered. Semi-read-protection, anyone? —

1633:

has been added to try to deal with the issue of non-admins wanting to edit protected pages.

1609: 9959: 9087: 9047: 8930: 8801: 8620: 8603: 8417: 8365: 8292: 8277: 8208: 8167: 8127: 7058: 6889: 6774: 6295: 5296: 5043: 4801: 4465: 4445: 4392: 4291:

screenshot can freely choose any license they want, similar to photography of a sculpture.

4009: 3996: 3817: 3719: 3100: 2329: 2153: 2051: 1513: 1278: 1199: 6811:, and force that to appear whenever an alternate link for the image itself is specified? — 5421:

or some simlar classification be of use on wikipedia, in adition to the category system?--

5336: 4570:"Flash Tub" characters, but it would be very, very helpful to set some sort of standards. 3237: 2702:

To comabt vandalism, the following rules could be put into place (coded, set up, however)

1968:

Excellent suggestion. I know of several such exchanges and I react the same way you do. -

1212: 8: 10006: 9640: 9443:

they're trying to create the new article, I think they're much more likely to read it. --

9068: 8435: 8393: 8334: 8029: 7802: 7725: 7240: 7239:

with subpages instead of having one huge page. This idea could potentially extend to the

7159: 7115: 7042: 6594: 6065: 6022: 5180: 5055: 5050: 5047: 4761: 4532: 4377: 4312: 4183: 3987: 3884: 3722: 3575: 3460: 3384:

Knowledge:Help_desk#¬¬¬¬\_How long are IP addresses logged and stored by Wikimedia?_/¬¬¬¬

3347: 3181: 3115: 3092: 3048: 3013: 2999: 2987: 2968: 2819: 2781: 2678: 2584: 2550: 2537: 2443: 2378: 2323: 2127: 1559: 1529: 1502: 9881:

object. This serialized object, in turn, has both the identifier of another row on the

9337: 9305: 9204: 8898: 8855: 8829: 8816: 8784: 8772: 8747: 8735: 8713: 8684: 8664: 8657: 8636: 8594: 8564: 8511: 8143:/me listens to the crickets chirping since nobody else seems interested enough to reply 7674: 7582: 7248: 7213: 7133: 7101: 6976: 6679:

An idea to help the RC patrol, by allowing them to review feeds that go at slower than

6317: 5757: 5722: 5705: 5692: 5566: 5439: 5158: 4834: 4634: 4416: 4329: 4035:

This is preposterous. I know of no legal theory to support that a license covering the

3918: 3835: 3799: 3766: 3629: 3582: 3553: 3415: 2938: 2902: 2839: 2656: 2313: 2259:

I agree with Garion. I'd hate to have to mentally parse that date format every time.

2251: 1995: 1924: 1856: 1850:

This change has been enacted, if you have any comment's please post on it's Talk Page.

1833: 1809: 1747: 1475: 1407: 1339: 1261: 1185: 5963:

the copyright status of the material and how such external links are to be treated. (

3150:

The only problem I can see is where there is more than one show by the same name, say

1758:

Knowledge:Village pump (perennial proposals)#Discussion Pages - Bring Modern Interface

9937: 9936:

table, which has within it the text for several revisions, compressed together (like

9617:

has a sophisticated article creation utility, that can do everything mentioned here.

9371: 9356: 9118: 7574: 7570:. the top two scripts on the list enable editing of the top section of an article. -- 7520: 7476: 7469: 7262: 6869: 6815: 6639: 6574: 6040: 5734: 5651: 5504:"All copyright rights in the Dewey Decimal Classification system are owned by OCLC." 5483: 5383: 5360: 5322: 5136: 4989: 4680: 4281: 4265: 4026: 3940: 2638:

to display IPs, registered users, and/or auto-blocked IPs only. Anyone else agree? --

2635: 2472: 1373:

I'm not sure if this is the best spot on the village pump to put this but here goes.

7724:

and its subprojects. I'm sure you'll find a good place to make your suggestions. —

7025:

We need more good ideas like this. It scales beautifully. I've added mine to mine. -

6928:

in multiple places is OK, might help. As, for example, what I did just below here.

6674: 5591: 4752:

The uses that this information could be put to are numerous. Some of these include:

4245:. So as I see it we distribute the source, to a derivate work of a GPL'd work. From 2196:

I would like to see ~~~~ signatures, and most other auto-generated dates, adhere to

8768: 8697: 8520: 8501:

Note that this proposal works well with articles in multiple categories. Example:

8469: 8458: 8454: 8310: 8246: 8189: 7168: 5952: 5806:

Each editor could decide if the video clip is worth the "pain" of the commercial.

5224: 4995: 4790: 4738: 4592:

Offline popular culture references would be a clear sign, such as All Your Base in

3745: 3690: 3402: 3366: 3357: 3340: 3039:

I've posted the comment there(quoting you). I urge you to register, though. Use a

2498: 2403: 2356: 2064: 1935: 1681: 1446: 5292:

There are various bots which try to ensure that the interwikis always correspond.

4053:— if we ever figure out a way to get a better license we'll modify that template. 2370:- sign, please, so I know who to ask for more information on an interesting idea. 1677:

large number of edits which seems to be pretty much a precondition for adminship.

9683: 9659: 9083: 9043: 8913: 8885: 8796: 8709: 8701: 8615: 8590: 8481: 8450: 8413: 8242: 7604: 7191: 7054: 6996: 6929: 6886: 6769: 6688: 6398: 6290: 6044: 5948: 5718: 5403: 5340: 5293: 5132: 4874: 4821: 4567: 4551: 4462: 4440: 4387: 3715: 3138: 2047: 1775: 1734: 1653:

I would like to propose instead that a "protected" page should instead become a "

1546: 1273: 1269: 1194: 1173: 9885:

table and a hash which identifies the revision within it. On this second row is

9153: 7545: 6269:

Change is in effect. Let's see how long it lasts before it gets reverted. ;-) —

5499: 5486:. I would also be up for a list of articles/categories by Dewey Decimal number. 2749:

like considering how many pages are created by users who later become inactive.

2014:

I think somebody should post transcripts of every Simpsons episode on Knowledge.

10002: 9951: 9845: 9825: 9636: 9360: 9304:

a better chance of spotting whether the article already exists in some form. —

9133: 9064: 9022: 8653: 8431: 8389: 8330: 8095: 8025: 7798: 7794: 7660: 7155: 7092: 7037: 6882: 6758: 6748: 6706: 6502: 6018: 5615: 5581: 5465: 5422: 5175: 4952: 4945: 4610: 4563: 4547: 4528: 4373: 4308: 4258: 4179: 3879: 3825: 3571: 3456: 3378:

Log of uses of CheckUser/IP address storage of users on database/Privacy policy

3176: 3074: 3044: 3031: 3009: 2995: 2964: 2950: 2922: 2854: 2814: 2776: 2763: 2731: 2674: 2613: 2580: 2533: 2467: 2439: 2374: 2347: 10022:

Knowledge:Wikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects#Alternative_Dispute Resolution

8465:

is, it would be either a selected subset (and hence inherently POV), or huge.

8360:, which would suggest that the ArbCom was then not going to read the evidence? 8019:

I agree there. Maybe after a break once the main page redesign is completed,

6603:

which got me thinking. What if a user needs help from an administrator that's

6545:

This is an absolute non-starter. It could crush wikipedia's growth potential.

4918: 4797: 10025: 9878: 9632: 9254: 9100: 9060: 9026: 9012: 8979: 8927:

i was told to post my request here so i have copy-past the whole thing here:

8813: 8781: 8744: 8732: 8727: 8681: 8661: 8238: 8234: 8159: 8146: 7933: 7600: 7453: 7407: 7373: 7350: 7322: 7282: 7244: 7128: 7083: 6973: 6658: 6631: 6612: 6608: 6535: 6489: 6460: 6388: 6314: 5847: 5754: 5601: 5435: 5155: 4965: 4855: 4847: 4665: 4631: 4626: 4618: 4413: 4409: 4345:

tag.) This is somewhat similar to how links to the current page are bolded.

3915: 3832: 3821: 3763: 3735: 3679: 3550: 3446: 3412: 3154:. I suppose in that case there could be a hierarchy of pages in which a new 3128: 3096: 2935: 2653: 2503: 2408: 2362: 2333: 2310: 2264: 2248: 2176: 2118: 2087: 1991: 1918: 1851: 1828: 1804: 1470: 1402: 1398: 1336: 1258: 1182: 7603:

as a base for linking articles on the separate parts at a central location.

3106:

It would look neater and be simpler if there was a common format to follow:

1292:

Like Rick I prefer ordinary links like in articles. To start with, I edited

9998: 9804: 9368: 8660:

policy is designed in aprt to accomodate and encourage commercial mirrors.

8089:, which isn't too much work for some of those clever-pedians we have here! 7677: 7571: 7512: 7388: 7145: 7144:

And those with privacy concerns are urged to pick adopt a day at random. (

6857: 6812: 6662: 6654: 6635: 6627: 6623: 6600: 6570: 6414: 6320: 6310: 6286: 5964: 5944: 5877: 5829: 5760: 5646: 5552: 5531: 5517: 5375: 5357: 5314: 5284: 5161: 5112: 5081: 5020: 4637: 4278: 4262: 4023: 3921: 3838: 3706: 3602: 3593: 3064: 2813:

Now that idea has some merit. I fixed your special link too, Infinity0. --

2659: 2617: 2518: 2508: 2423: 2413: 2396: 2342:

I dont think many people would be happy about revealing their IP, there is

2111: 1662: 1558:, and analysis on length of responses would be nice too! :-) And remember: 1442: 1388: 1355: 1323: 1312: 1301: 1216: 9862:. If I understood the code correctly, if a revision's text (stored on the 6289:

and revert to the stable version while we discuss this even more. Thanks!

5510: 4862:

Well, me thinks it's a great idea. The only problem is actually doing it.

4760:. People like to know about themselves and their community. It might make 3675:

running a semi-automated bot to assist changing this usage where it exists

2712:

Newly-created articles are automatically added to the creator's watchlist.

1726:

of objects, ordered by last post. Similar to the way message boards like

1643:

a change may sometimes take rather longer to describe than to make oneself

10114: 9941: 9894: 9835: 9766: 9720: 9670: 9669:

dev. (Or do you mean just a casual warning, not a link-by-link check?) --

9614: 9558: 9404:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Kmf164/newpage&action=edit

9401:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Kmf164/newpage&action=edit

9219:

Edit wars and volatility are one of the primary issues dealt with by the

9145: 7859: 7831: 7632: 7537: 7026: 6937: 5456: 4960:

I don't think I understand. Can you explain what you mean by a "wiki"?

4907: 4894: 3671:. Is there a consensus agreeing with my point? If so, could I suggest: 2797: 2639: 2603: 2222: 2142: 2037: 1969: 1911:

A summary of their result can be added back to the original conversation.

1761: 6229: 1696:

This would require a technical implementation, and regular page locking

8954:

there is also a huge number of pages that are waiting to be created at

8931:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Article_not_found&action=edit

8851: 8847: 7812: 6842: 6791: 6716: 6160:

That's fine with me, if it's what you want. If you do decide to change

5399: 4486: 4355: 4070:

also releases it under the GPL, by what theory wouldn't the GPL apply?

2740:

I would agree with this if you change the third part to "You receive a

2284: 1731: 9359:

did this. Unfortunately, someone changed it to place its articles in

8955: 8291:

My talk is probably a better place for this discussion, by the way. -

7511:"What links here" is, just another link saying "Edit introduction". -- 6832: 6661:

subpage are good catchalls because a lot of admins watch these pages.-

5419: 4022:

Note: This can only be changed on software that is GPL'd obviously. --

3624:

Hey, I've just posted a proposal which might be relevant to this; see

2367: 9395:

I think it's feasible to improve what what one sees at (for example)

8574: 7588: 7533: 7427: 7297: 6835:

for adding a "link=" parameter to the image tag, as in this example:

5669: 4461:

Anything to stop sigs growing to a stupid size, as some people have.

3657: 3438:

This code must be shared by the same article over all languages of wp

3300: 1896:

At any point in a converstion, someone suggests to "take it outside".

1599: 1555: 10070:

This will save time to admins dealing with IP vandalism form AOL. --

10020:

I have posted Alternative Dispute Resolution as a proposed group at

9993:

The question itself offers complete answer in a form of an article.

9214:

http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175545&cid=14594374

8115:(cross-posted as this is an odd little policy, so here is good, too) 7387:

It's an interesting idea, but as it is now it's not very practical.

7052:

I was going to also suggest adding one's year too. Excellent ideas.

1397:

Can I suggest that while this battle rages (it's spilling over into

9103:

rankings; creating our own comparisons would be original research.

7930:

http://openusability.org/reports/view.php?group_id=109&repid=69

7596: 4961: 4851: 4614: 4494: 4363: 3790: 2649: 2292: 2260: 2197: 2172: 2083: 1254: 7644:

Knowledge contribution for technical dummies but academic geniuses

5858:

patient, not to add anymore links yet, and continue discussion. —

4850:. I'm sure he already has all of this information on all of us. 3514:

I'm not sure what the best solution is, but it's not what we got.

2994:

which may be of use here. Just some comments; respond as desired.

2579:

I'd like to wait a while before considering reversing the change.

1545:

Looks pretty cool to me! You may be interested for applying for a

8453:, which is a randomly-selected and small subset of articles from 5688: 5639: 4737:

Area of interest/expertise (List taken mainly from the main page

4593: 4554:. After seeing many, many notable internet memes end up on AfD ( 3661: 3626:

Creating syntax for date preference formatting that isn't linking

2036:

That would be flagrant violation of Fox Entertainment copyright.

1917:, and if the response is positive, I'll create a Knowledge page. 1245:) will be more user-friendly and familiar. And if not that then ( 1149:

be found elsewhere, but there is no link from the prefs screens.

9844:

Do you have a link to the details please? I'm quite interested.

8602:

Feature requests are made using the bug tracking mechanism, see

8484:, which at least provides a useful "who's-who and why" index of 7243:. Your comments and thoughts would be most appreciated. Thanks! 5927:

for free. The external links ti teh clips are completely legal.

5901:

Now, I would like to address other issues by Ambush and others:

4433:

If the software automatically added CSS classes to wikilinks to

4425:

If the software automatically added CSS classes to wikilinks to

4339:

If the software automatically added CSS classes to wikilinks to

6701: 4524: 4520: 4508: 3063:

How about flagging edits to unwatched pages on Recent Changes?

2280:

changes ~~~~ to an date-preference-enabled-ISO8601 timestamp.

9169:

controversial aspects need to be watched extremely carefully.

2762:

OK, suggestion noted. Also added the unwatched pages special.

9869:— more than one revision can point to the same text) has the 5505: 4650: 4238: 3999: 3040: 2722:

made available to all registered users. Currently admin-only.

2569:

trace. 71.141.251.153's post sums up my thoughts quite well.

2459:

Knowledge:Wikiproject/List of proposed projects#Legal defence

1727: 1497:

I have been experimenting with using a script to generate an

90:

a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.

7336:

But it is only a tutorial ;) Now I want to lead a campaign.

7329:. It is boring work when we do it daily, but not when it is 1803:

for details, including suggested markup and a sample link.

1423:

won't see such major arguments as have recently occurred. -

82:

This page contains discussions that have been archived from

10111: 9874: 9700:

colours and headers based on the contents of linked pages.

8649: 8080: 6841:

If you like it, please go to MediaZilla and vote for it. --

3008:

Post further comments on the Bugzilla bug (which I filed).

1593: 1250: 1246: 9158: 7550: 6800: 4873:

proposal go from here if it reaches a general consensus??

4600:

Any other thoughts? I'd really like to see this occur. --

3705:

I agree, "died" is more direct and simple, hence better.--

6375:

How can we figure out what made this fundraiser take off?

5975:

available at evtv1.com, with full copyright compliance).

5200:

A published supplement to Knowledge - a policy suggestion

4661: 4246: 2082:

We discourage linking to sites which violate copyright.

1215:. I wonder which MediaWiki page to edit to put it back.-- 4429:

when user Foo is logged in, that would make life better.

3435:

Every distinct article should have an alphanumeric code.

1381:

I have to revise my collection of userboxes I know why.

8951:

i didn't get an acount for a long time for this reason

8476:

is neatly organised into sub-categories. Trouble with

7233:

Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk#Restructure_with_subpages

7208:

OK, it seems that this idea has overwhelming support.

3651:

Grim reaper: The portender of death or of passing away?

2171:

Administrators on Knowledge don't "approve" anything.

2099:

Wikisource is also not permitted to violate copyright.

1746:

and mocked it up. I still think it is a good idea. --

1242: 1158: 7506:

Edit Article Intro (without having to edit whole page)

7127:

Brilliant idea! St. Joan of Arc's day is now watched!

5614:

work but at least I know where the template is now. --

3981: 3262: 2612:

There are third-party tools to do similar things. See

2461:. I am not sure whether I should also clarify this at 1493:

Bot generated AFD summaries - an alternative interface

10093:

Could be even further extended to mark shared IPs. --

9919:

table contains data about a single revision; and the

6061:

dubious, but I think we could have a better message.

4906:

and the study apparently hasn't been published yet.--

4307:

on the blanket GNU permission. It could be helpful.

4103:

for documentation or screenshots). Sorry about that.

4066:

is released under the GPL, and the person taking the

3664:). "Passed away" could perhaps even be seen as POV. 3399:

John Seigenthaler Sr. Knowledge biography controversy

2306:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (biographies)#proposal

1458:

But perfectly innocuous templates are being deleted (

8956:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requested_articles

3562:

Stopping the online unit converter creep and shuffle

5356:, and discussion is taking place on the talk page. 10106:Alphabet info in languages infobox (bottom maybe?) 9923:table contains the text of a single revision. The 9631:. Links like this can be generated by submitting 9136:: representing all sides is vital to NPOV. We do 8791:Category intersection is an existing request, see 7627:, and something similar to this could be done for 6408:Dealing with images with no license/copyright info 6005:. Do video clips really add to an encyclopedia? — 3494:Interlanguage links do have a number of problems: 1268:In this specific case, I'd prefer "Mark all edits 9799:articles, or by working on the articles that are 9478:vanity pages, advertising, advocacy/POV, ... and 8491:So, my proposal: modify the ] syntax as follows: 6200:Where would the best place to publicize it be? — 3644: 2368:http://meta.wikimedia.org/User:Robchurch/Blocking 1990:I've created a Knowledge page. The short-cut is 10016:Proposed Project: Alternative Dispute Resolution 9854:Taking a look at the code, I found it's done at 7788:to Knowledge, and I don't think Wikimedia is in 5850:... but I think you're just misusing vocabulary. 5111:Would this be hard to implement in Mediawiki? -- 2395:Following the recent launch of my organisation, 9627:That feature is available here. Try following 8540:currently is a pointer to other lists, such as 7406:So - on pl wiki start has not been easy too... 7082:on November 8. Keep those great ideas coming!! 6712:Do other Wikipedians think this is a problem? 1721:MediaWiki should have a message board-like page 1639:By "slow and unreliable", what I mean is that: 9915:table contains data about the whole page; the 9099:appearance in some reputable source, e.g. the 8897:useful, in the absence of the real thing.) — 8109:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Clerk's office 7036:What a cool idea. Added birthday and year. -- 6651:Knowledge:Requests for administrator attention 5221:Talk:List of limited series#Building consensus 4764:job easier in that sense. Also, it would make 3862:have experience/authority. To say that it is " 3299:Eh? That kind of humor really isn't funny :-P 2564:I would like to cite the points brought up in 6611:can be used for)? I propose a page much like 10045:Anons (users not logged in) aka User:1.2.3.4 9927:table has a flags field; if it contains the 7614:interface would make them even more useful. 6257:Okay, the change will be going live soon. — 3204:Suggesting a replacement for the NPOV notice 2560:Review the anonymous article creation policy 1554:popular (too much success). Don't forget to 9990:" and combine data to answer the question. 7886:Knowledge:Searching#External_search_engines 6695:What should happen when you click an image? 5824:You can also contact me at J.ali@evtv1.com 4660:meme. Hatten ar Din isn't going to get on 3501:th version is created, it must be added to 3171:Sounds like something that would go in the 10048:Users (users logged in) aka User:username 9816:Ability to physically edit own top edition 9653:Preview warn about links to disambig pages 9124:Arguments for and against drug prohibition 8743:number? If not, i suggest that you do so. 8166:appear to be attracting some attention. - 7568:Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts 7341:Writing articles about castles and legends 7016:Great idea. Let's do it. I've added mine. 6599:I recently had a problem with the article 6355:Fundraising figures, and fundraiser design 5751:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Enforcement 5354:Knowledge:Requests for rollback privileges 4785:that might want to get together to form a 3628:above — my idea covers unit conversion. — 3208:Hello alls, I would like to replace this. 1953:It would help Village Pump I suppose... — 10112:http://en.wikipedia.org/Infobox#Languages 9090:) 10:16 AM, Monday; January 30 2006 (EST) 7227:Restructuring ref/help desk with subpages 7061:) 12:41 AM, Monday; January 30 2006 (EST) 6056:Change "Unprotect" to "Change protection" 4974:but it may be jarring for newer users. — 3970:I've seen this disclaimer on images like 3816:This has been discussed at length on the 3247:Learn how and when to remove this message 2707:Only logged in users can create articles. 2673:See section directly above this one. ;-) 2096:Wouldn't wikisource be more appropriate? 10041:Currently there are two types of users. 9791:I'd like to announce the opening of the 9050:) 9:58 PM, Sunday; January 29 2006 (EST) 7566:and the list of scripts available is at 6799: 6630:, I think a page virtually identical to 4768:more comprehensive on breadth and depth. 4139:requesting clarification on this issue. 3356:Copying text to word is fairly easy. -- 3261: 3236:Please do not remove this message until 9021:All these pages follow the example for 8704:, because people don't even know there 8696:continually be things getting added to 6133:? If it looks too similar, you can try 5214:Comic book limited, min and maxi series 5195:Making Knowledge into a reliable source 4609:I agree with Jeff that a discussion at 4431:should actually be something more like 3976: 3828:to that extent were soundly rejected). 3323:Ways to counter vanadalism/poor editing 2532:, the Foundation has it under control. 14: 9004:older pages to forward chronological. 8966:and look under the Proposals section. 8472:, which is guaranteed to be complete, 8468:So, let's ditch the list and just use 7591:? This could be useful in the article 6003:Knowledge:Knowledge is an encyclopedia 5339:" button. But it's only available for 2689:Forced to be on at least one watchlist 2402:I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. 1594:http://en.wikinews.org/Portal:Football 9873:flag, its contents are not (possibly 9858:, called (in a very indirect way) by 8445:Annotated categories instead of lists 7587:Wouldn't it be great if we could use 7323:Here is link to the quest "Interwiki" 7100:Support from me — I've added mine. — 6446:would be open for business as usual. 4722:How long has the person been a member 3426:Linking different wikipedias together 3273:Not within 200 miles of this article! 3152:Battlestar Galactica (disambiguation) 2157: 9877:) text as usual, but it's instead a 9332:Since I'm not a developer I find it 9055:I don't think this is a good idea. 6901:Proposed policy against multiposting 5919:5) evtv1 has secured the license to 4781:We could see where there is a large 4706:Languages spoken (and to what level) 4174:are required to provide source code 3641:Terminology (Passing away vs. Dying) 3210: 2992:add pages you edit to your watchlist 9480:Knowledge:List of bad article ideas 8998:January 2005 in Britain and Ireland 8868:Category browsing and intersection 8480:is that it's not annotated; unlike 6987:add your birthday to your watchlist 6064:Therefore, I propose we change the 5149:Knowledge:Admin accountability poll 4703:Highest level of education attained 2152:Moderators = administrators. Dur. 1744:similar proposal about 6 months ago 1625:Moderating edits to protected pages 23: 8538:List of islands of Central America 8342:I don't understand this argument. 8266:the work done and that they don't 8258:The problem is that as long as we 7564:Knowledge:WikiProject User scripts 6910:. What do you all think? (and I'm 6617:Knowledge:Administrator Assistance 5854:only if the license allows for it. 5528:Library of Congress Classification 5205:This multiposted content moved to 4043:of the software. Let's stick with 3956:Template:linux-software-screenshot 24: 18:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) 10128: 10001:exists to answer such questions. 9988:from this address, this paragraph 8850:is the same as my proposal; also 8731:one-size fits all solution here. 8081:Click here to look at the portal. 7231:There is currently discussion at 6685:User:JesseW/Recent_Changes_Slices 6397:Neat! Thanks for the work. :) -- 4712:Ethnicity (This one might not be 3043:if you're worried about privacy. 2696:Bugzilla page for this suggestion 2634:There should be a way to set the 2161: 2158: 9635:with the preload attribute set. 9152: 9036:New Knowledge Page Type Proposal 8762:I'll tell you what I would find 7544: 6970:Knowledge talk:Proposed deletion 6687:. Comments greatly appreciated. 6233:Knowledge talk:Protection policy 4507:'s sigs will appear the same to 4403:avaialbel, i have no objection, 3986: 3980: 3682:to discourage this kind of usage 3646: 3401:was solved by tracking an IP. -- 3215: 2566:this dicussion of the new policy 2344:Knowledge:Requests for CheckUser 78:Village pump (proposals) archive 8644:It is my understandign that we 8558:By the way, I don't think that 8028:page more useful, with link to 8021:Knowledge:WikiProject_Usability 7932:is a report (November 2005) on 7521: 7513: 7389: 7091:The simple ideas are the best. 6655:The Administrator's noticeboard 6559:Request for rollback privileges 5999:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 5809:Does this idea make any sense? 5627:Wiklink on first occurence only 5384: 5376: 5323: 5315: 5207:Knowledge:Village pump (policy) 4796:It might help with discovering 4693:think would be useful include: 3912:Knowledge:Requests for rollback 2724:- probably not going to happen. 2476: 2046:And also just a terrible idea. 1863: 1858: 1840: 1835: 1816: 1811: 9557:deleting it, they'll read it. 9142:creation-evolution controversy 8989:Month Year in Something Events 8142: 7496: 7493: 7490: 7487: 7484: 7481: 6851:taxobox for chemical compounds 5541:any comprehensive exposition. 4039:could magically transfer to a 3647:File:Death Personification.jpg 3270:There is no NPOV issue at all! 2071: 2068: 2065: 2025: 13: 1: 10066:regular anon aka User:1.2.3.4 9117:We have a page like this for 8962:I would suggest that you try 8923:edit "article not found" page 8888:11:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8854:covers the category issue. — 8418: 8276:be spent arguing about it. - 7167:or to watch multiple pages. 6833:feature request on MediaZilla 6691:09:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6384:research on fundraiser design 6237:Knowledge talk:Administrators 5898:They receive monies from us. 5051: 4328:I've been very happily using 3789:I vote to use "croaked" ;) - 3175:. I like the idea, a lot. -- 2192:Make ~~~~ signatures ISO 8601 2154: 1822:18:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1138:More helpful preferences, etc 10118:05:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 10100:16:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 10089:16:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 10077:16:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 10029:21:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 10010:04:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9955:23:00, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9945:22:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9898:22:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9849:21:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9839:21:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9829:13:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9808:19:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 9801:already close to being ready 9770:11:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 9745:11:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 9724:08:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 9705:08:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 9687:23:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9674:22:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9663:22:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9644:06:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 9622:22:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9597:18:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9562:18:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9528:18:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9498:18:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9457:18:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9448:17:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9430:17:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9385:17:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9375:16:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9346:19:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9328:16:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9314:16:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9298:16:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9228:07:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9196:07:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9177:09:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9164:01:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9111:01:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9072:05:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 9057:Knowledge is an encyclopedia 9030:00:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 9016:11:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 8983:15:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8974:14:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8916:06:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8914:JesseW, the juggling janitor 8907:13:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8886:JesseW, the juggling janitor 8864:13:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 8833:23:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8819:21:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8807:21:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8787:21:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8776:21:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8750:20:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8738:20:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8717:20:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8687:19:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8667:20:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8640:18:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8626:18:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8598:11:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8583:02:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8568:11:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8546:Category:Islands of Honduras 8531:00:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 8515:23:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 8439:05:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8424:17:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8397:05:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8375:15:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8338:13:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8314:04:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8302:02:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8287:02:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8254:02:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8218:01:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8197:01:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8177:01:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8154:01:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 8137:02:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 8099:13:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 8048:00:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7987:00:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7953:00:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7905:00:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7863:05:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 7853:01:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 7835:19:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 7819:22:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 7806:15:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 7730:02:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7715:08:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 7695:00:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7681:19:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 7664:19:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 7654:18:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 7636:03:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7619:00:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7608:23:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 7577:01:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7556:01:44, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7528:01:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7501:16:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7457:12:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 7431:22:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 7411:21:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 7394:07:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 7377:21:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 7364:03:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 7354:00:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 7339:First quests in pl wiki was 7316:Look for schema in pl wiki: 7301:22:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7286:21:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7253:23:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 7222:13:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 7194:11:36, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 7192:JesseW, the juggling janitor 7180:03:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 7163:03:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 7149:03:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 7140:23:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 7123:18:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 7110:14:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 7096:14:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 7087:14:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 7073:22:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 7048:22:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 7032:22:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 7021:03:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 7012:02:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 7005:Neat suggestion. Why not? — 7000:01:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6979:17:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 6950:04:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 6941:10:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6932:09:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6930:JesseW, the juggling janitor 6919:02:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6893:15:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6877:10:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 6846:21:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6819:13:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6795:13:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6783:00:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6739:21:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 6720:21:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 6689:JesseW, the juggling janitor 6666:22:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6644:20:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 6622:My initial thought was that 6607:related to vandalism (which 6587:23:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 6550:04:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 6539:10:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 6506:00:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 6493:10:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 6479:00:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 6464:23:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 6433:04:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 6418:15:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 6392:22:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 6343:23:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6328:22:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6304:22:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6276:19:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6264:19:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6244:02:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 6207:02:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 6184:02:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 6148:22:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6117:22:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6102:04:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6089:04:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6079:01:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 6048:18:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6031:18:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 6012:17:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 5992:20:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5968:19:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5956:19:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5938:14:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5891:14:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5881:06:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5865:03:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5833:03:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5820:03:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5768:13:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 5738:17:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5726:17:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 5709:17:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 5696:13:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 5679:23:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 5658:19:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 5619:15:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5605:12:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 5585:19:03, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 5556:03:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5546:05:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5535:05:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5521:05:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5491:03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5469:02:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5460:01:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5444:23:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 5426:23:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 5407:18:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5391:11:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5366:18:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5348:16:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5330:10:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5300:19:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5288:08:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 5274:05:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 5264:05:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 5249:05:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 5231:14:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 5186:23:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 5169:18:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 5140:16:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5126:07:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5116:07:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5098:18:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5059:14:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 5037:10:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 4981:22:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 4968:18:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 4956:17:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 4941:20:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4926:19:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4911:11:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 4898:09:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 4888:04:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 4673:18:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4645:16:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 4621:19:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 4605:14:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 4536:07:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4469:19:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 4451:21:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 4419:19:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 4398:17:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 4381:11:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 4316:21:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4296:21:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4285:19:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4269:08:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4216:17:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4187:07:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4157:17:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4131:04:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4121:03:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4098:03:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4088:03:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4058:01:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 4030:21:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3944:18:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3929:11:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3900:02:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3890:01:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3857:01:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3846:01:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3803:13:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3794:23:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 3784:01:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 3633:13:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3616:22:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3606:04:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3597:02:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3586:23:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 3556:19:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3538:04:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3519:20:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3484:17:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3465:17:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3450:16:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3418:19:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3406:04:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3391:18:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3370:12:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3361:04:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3351:20:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3333:18:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 3313:22:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3304:15:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 3295:00:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 3198:16:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3187:17:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 3163:16:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 3158:was a sort of TV disambig.-- 3142:00:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 3078:18:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3068:16:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 3052:21:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3035:20:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3017:19:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3004:18:58, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2972:19:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2954:12:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2942:19:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2926:17:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2911:05:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2888:00:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2873:00:02, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2858:19:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2848:19:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2825:18:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2801:18:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2787:17:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2767:18:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2754:00:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2735:00:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2683:17:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 2667:16:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 2643:07:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 2621:08:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 2607:07:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 2588:19:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2554:19:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2541:19:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2524:19:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2492:06:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2482: 2447:19:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2429:12:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2383:23:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 2351:16:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 2337:15:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 2316:19:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 2267:19:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2255:17:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 2179:19:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC) 2104:01:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 1985:01:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 1702:Knowledge:General disclaimer 1499:alternative interface to AFD 7: 8542:List of islands of Honduras 7722:Knowledge:WikiProject Music 6962:Knowledge:Proposed deletion 5239:interwiki between languages 4878:06:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 4867:18:39, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 4858:16:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 4841:23:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 4825:22:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 3808:Adminstrator accountability 3770:16:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 3755:13:35, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 3739:12:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 3728:01:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 3710:23:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 3700:21:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 3283:20:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 3238:conditions to do so are met 3132:23:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2391:Keeping the Knowledge Civil 2301:Nationality in Bio Articles 2239:00:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2167:04:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2148:00:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2141:We don't have moderators. - 2137:00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2122:23:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 2090:16:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 2078:04:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 2059:03:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 2041:19:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 2032:17:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1999:06:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1973:02:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1960:00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1945:13:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1928:04:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1887:Knowledge:LGBT notice board 1869:06:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1846:20:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 1785:00:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1765:20:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1751:07:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1737:07:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1715:00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1691:13:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1619:00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1603:14:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 1569:00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1533:13:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 1517:15:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 1506:15:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 1482:23:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 1452:13:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 1428:00:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1414:22:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1392:22:28, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1359:22:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1342:10:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1327:09:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1316:01:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1305:01:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1284:03:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1264:23:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1220:16:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1211:There used to be a link to 1205:14:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1188:10:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1157:I propose the addition of ( 10: 10133: 9363:, so it got jumped on and 9237:Improving Article Creation 7761:Keep up the awesome work! 6866:Knowledge:Chemical infobox 6615:but called something like 5480:Category:Dewey Decimal 111 5335:Actually, it exists as a " 5209:under same section header. 5067:Thanks. Sorry about that. 4579:Prime Number Shitting Bear 3308:Most of BJAODN isn't. :-) 3121:This has also been posted 2463:Knowledge:No legal threats 2278:User:Quarl/advanced_sig.js 1794:MediaWiki:Anontalkpagetext 1369:Peace, Rows, and Userboxes 9903:Argh... :S What does the 9221:Knowledge:Stable versions 9159: 9147: 7625:Wellington Street, Ottawa 7551: 7539: 7079:Cool! I just caught this 6472:Knowledge:Stable versions 5945:free as in speech content 4048:linux-software-screenshot 3965:linux-software-screenshot 3278:Thank you for your time, 3156:Battlestar Galactica (TV) 3137:Quite sensible. I agree. 2453:WikiProject Legal defence 2328:Is there a way to detect 1298:MediaWiki:Tog-editsection 1294:MediaWiki:Tog-showtoolbar 9412:MediaWiki:Newarticletext 8995:February 2005 in science 7277:and for related changes 7235:about restructuring the 7190:Me too; excellent idea. 6423:Images used on this page 4542:Internet Meme Guidelines 4515:is logged in. However, 3994:This is a screenshot of 3601:I've removed the links.- 3382:I have made proposal at 2961:WP:VPT#Watchlist Changes 1700:be kept (for pages like 1610:wikinews:Portal:Football 1580:Wikinews Football Portal 84:Village pump (proposals) 10060:Users aka user:Username 9408:MediaWiki:Noarticletext 8912:features to MediaWiki. 7629:Worms weapons and tools 7593:Worms weapons and tools 6972:to express your views. 5498:classification outline 5352:There is a proposal at 4728:Computer literacy level 4613:might be a good idea. 4558:about a zillion times, 3109:I'd personally opt for 1560:voting isn't everything 9793:Featured Music Project 9787:Featured Music Project 8964:Knowledge:Village pump 8935:i want to change this 8656:for more on this. Our 8096:The magical Spum-dandy 7661:The magical Spum-dandy 6908:Knowledge:Multiposting 6881:and/or help us out at 6805: 6017:articles' talk pages. 5452:List of people by name 4511:regardless of whether 4324:Signature highlighting 3761:Knowledge:Bot requests 3652: 3275: 2984:Special:Unwatchedpages 2836:Special:Unwatchedpages 2834:By the way, I believe 2720:Special:Unwatchedpages 2210: 1631:Template:Editprotected 95:< Older discussions 8870:have been implemented 8846:I've just found that 8510:What do you think? — 8206:bad if nothing else? 6803: 6747:The Wikinews logo on 6683:, the way it is now. 6675:Recent Changes Slices 6566:requests for rollback 6231:Other good pages are 5482:can be a redirect to 5000:Special:Recentchanges 4776:Counter systemic bias 4687:Knowledge Wide Census 4523:'s links appear (and 4012:for more information. 3650: 3505:−1 existing versions. 3288:*laughs* BJAODNed. — 3265: 2206: 1892:Here's how it works: 1668:Obviously moderation 8604:Knowledge:MediaZilla 7769:comment was added by 5933:Thanks for reading! 5909:way to argue taste. 5418:Could Dewey Decimal 5044:Special:Log/newusers 4932:Links to other wikis 4820:What do you think?? 4664:or written about in 4519:could customize how 4300:Photos of sculpture 3669:large number of hits 3101:Coupling (TV series) 2648:I believe that's in 2630:block list filtering 1257:) get used enough). 9397:User:Kmf164/newpage 9191:it into something. 8968:CambridgeBayWeather 8872:on the toolserver: 8030:Knowledge:Searching 7294:User:Rayc/Wikiquest 6914:posting this here) 6829:Template talk:Click 6766:Template talk:Click 6681:87 edits per minute 6563:Please vote on the 6456:What do you think? 6066:MediaWiki:Unprotect 5642:bla bla bla Article 5308:One-click Reversion 3779:it again later on. 3678:an addition to the 3576:conversion of units 3229:of this article is 3116:The Vicar of Dibley 3093:Bottom (television) 2746:confirmation prompt 2128:meta:Polls are evil 2010:episode transcripts 10056:So we would have: 9972:Why is this good. 9171:Christopher Parham 9105:Christopher Parham 7797:for their claims. 7675:wikipedia:tutorial 7327:lokal hall of fame 7154:Or multiple days. 6806: 5637:It will render as 4807:It would give the 4332:'s idea of adding 4330:User:HorsePunchKid 3939:controlling him. * 3653: 3276: 3041:disposable account 1589:Anyway, the link; 1213:m:Help:Preferences 10098: 10087: 10075: 9938:solid compression 9495: 9427: 9357:Template:New page 9119:drug legalization 9091: 9061:original research 9051: 8878:CategoryIntersect 8805: 8624: 8251: 8194: 8151: 8045: 7950: 7902: 7783: 7477:Special:Listusers 7470:Special:Listusers 7263:Knowledge:WikiRPG 7136: 7062: 7030: 6781: 6649:Are you aware of 6642: 6302: 6041:Wikimedia Commons 6029: 5776:Wikivideo Project 5484:Category:Ontology 5002:, but there's no 4838: 4809:public perception 4566:from the one-off 4503:So you're saying 4497: 4449: 4396: 4366: 4237:different from a 4213: 4201:Crotalus horridus 4154: 4142:Crotalus horridus 4137:licensing@fsf.org 4118: 4106:Crotalus horridus 4085: 4073:Crotalus horridus 4017: 4016: 4002:computer software 3826:earlier proposals 3475:interwiki linking 3257: 3256: 3249: 2594:user watch option 2484: 2480: 2397:Community Justice 2295: 2227:2006–01–08 23:09Z 2146: 1877:Taking it outside 1478: 1410: 1282: 1203: 1171: 1156: 10124: 10094: 10083: 10071: 9906: 9487: 9419: 9274:== References == 9161: 9157: 9156: 9149: 9082: 9042: 8799: 8769:Category:Sailors 8759:use Linux... :-( 8698:Category:Sailors 8618: 8528: 8523: 8470:Category:Sailors 8461:. Trouble with 8459:Category:Sailors 8455:Category:Sailors 8420: 8368: 8295: 8280: 8250: 8211: 8193: 8170: 8149: 8145: 8144: 8130: 8037: 7942: 7894: 7884:search boxes to 7762: 7712:GlamdringCookies 7553: 7549: 7548: 7541: 7525: 7517: 7498: 7495: 7492: 7489: 7486: 7483: 7391: 7255:</nowiki: --> 7134: 7118: 7071: 7069:Ambush Commander 7053: 7029: 7010: 7008:Ambush Commander 6778: 6772: 6763: 6757: 6638: 6438:"Authority" idea 6341: 6339:Ambush Commander 6325: 6299: 6293: 6274: 6272:Ambush Commander 6262: 6260:Ambush Commander 6205: 6203:Ambush Commander 6178:Knowledge Seeker 6146: 6144:Ambush Commander 6115: 6113:Ambush Commander 6096:Knowledge Seeker 6077: 6075:Ambush Commander 6021: 6010: 6008:Ambush Commander 5863: 5861:Ambush Commander 5797:Here is the idea 5765: 5654: 5649: 5388: 5380: 5363: 5327: 5319: 5166: 5096: 5094: 5088: 5080: 5075: 5053: 5035: 5033: 5027: 5019: 5014: 5004:Special:Newusers 4996:Special:Newpages 4979: 4977:Ambush Commander 4832: 4700:Country and City 4685:Could we have a 4642: 4499: 4489: 4478:the wikisource, 4443: 4390: 4368: 4358: 4203: 4144: 4138: 4108: 4075: 4052: 4046: 3990: 3984: 3977: 3969: 3963: 3926: 3843: 3753: 3751: 3725: 3698: 3696: 3648: 3536: 3534:Ambush Commander 3482: 3480:Ambush Commander 3293: 3291:Ambush Commander 3267:This is just in: 3252: 3245: 3241: 3219: 3218: 3211: 3160:Samuel J. Howard 2871: 2869:Ambush Commander 2664: 2521: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2501: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2474: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2297: 2287: 2237: 2235:Ambush Commander 2164: 2163: 2160: 2156: 2145: 2135: 2133:Ambush Commander 2076: 2069: 2067: 2029: 1958: 1956:Ambush Commander 1943: 1941: 1865: 1860: 1854: 1842: 1837: 1831: 1818: 1813: 1807: 1783: 1781:Ambush Commander 1713: 1711:Ambush Commander 1689: 1687: 1617: 1615:Ambush Commander 1567: 1565:Ambush Commander 1476: 1467: 1461: 1408: 1354:I see. Thanks.-- 1276: 1272:by default?" -- 1197: 1167: 1152: 79: 54: 10132: 10131: 10127: 10126: 10125: 10123: 10122: 10121: 10108: 10039: 10018: 9962: 9904: 9891:compressOld.inc 9856:HistoryBlob.php 9818: 9789: 9655: 9343: 9338:Johan the Ghost 9311: 9306:Johan the Ghost 9239: 9207: 9151: 9038: 8991: 8925: 8904: 8899:Johan the Ghost 8861: 8856:Johan the Ghost 8828:lists. :-( — 8710:List of sailors 8702:List of sailors 8591:List of sailors 8527:kiss the lizard 8526: 8521: 8505: 8495: 8482:List of sailors 8451:List of sailors 8447: 8366: 8293: 8278: 8209: 8168: 8147: 8128: 8112: 8070: 7738: 7703: 7701:Band Formatting 7646: 7585: 7543: 7508: 7473: 7320: 7266: 7229: 7219: 7214:Johan the Ghost 7116: 7107: 7102:Johan the Ghost 7067: 7045: 7006: 6989: 6965: 6903: 6864:Take a look at 6853: 6839: 6776: 6761: 6755: 6697: 6677: 6597: 6561: 6440: 6425: 6410: 6357: 6337: 6322: 6297: 6270: 6258: 6201: 6142: 6111: 6073: 6058: 6006: 5949:free as in beer 5859: 5778: 5762: 5748: 5746:RFC Enforcement 5677: 5656: 5652: 5647: 5635: 5634:] bla bla bla ] 5629: 5592:m:Cite/Cite.php 5569: 5416: 5374:nonvandalism.-- 5361: 5310: 5241: 5216: 5202: 5197: 5183: 5163: 5152: 5108: 5106:Different diffs 5095: 5090: 5082: 5076: 5068: 5034: 5029: 5021: 5015: 5007: 4992: 4975: 4948: 4934: 4923:Joachim Schroer 4800:and in logging 4683: 4639: 4568:Something Awful 4564:Magical Trevors 4544: 4483: 4352: 4326: 4275: 4259:Talk: Copyright 4254: 4136: 4135:I have emailed 4050: 4044: 3967: 3961: 3959: 3923: 3887: 3840: 3810: 3749: 3744: 3723: 3694: 3689: 3680:manual of style 3643: 3568:dozens of links 3564: 3532: 3478: 3428: 3380: 3343: 3325: 3289: 3253: 3242: 3235: 3220: 3216: 3206: 3184: 3173:Manual of Style 3086: 2867: 2822: 2784: 2723: 2708: 2691: 2661: 2632: 2596: 2562: 2519: 2514: 2509: 2504: 2499: 2479: 2455: 2424: 2419: 2414: 2409: 2404: 2393: 2363:Special:Blockip 2359: 2326: 2303: 2281: 2233: 2194: 2131: 2114: 2012: 1954: 1939: 1934: 1879: 1867: 1852: 1844: 1829: 1820: 1805: 1797: 1779: 1776:Knowledge:Forum 1723: 1709: 1685: 1680: 1627: 1613: 1582: 1563: 1514:KillerChihuahua 1495: 1465: 1459: 1371: 1140: 1135: 80: 77: 74: 48: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 10130: 10107: 10104: 10103: 10102: 10091: 10068: 10067: 10064: 10061: 10050: 10049: 10046: 10038: 10037:New user class 10035: 10033: 10017: 10014: 10013: 10012: 9999:reference desk 9984: 9983: 9980: 9977: 9961: 9958: 9948: 9947: 9935: 9930: 9926: 9922: 9918: 9914: 9901: 9900: 9884: 9872: 9865: 9842: 9841: 9817: 9814: 9812: 9788: 9785: 9783: 9781: 9780: 9779: 9778: 9777: 9776: 9775: 9774: 9773: 9772: 9754: 9753: 9752: 9751: 9750: 9749: 9748: 9747: 9731: 9730: 9729: 9728: 9727: 9726: 9712: 9711: 9710: 9709: 9708: 9707: 9692: 9691: 9690: 9689: 9677: 9676: 9654: 9651: 9649: 9647: 9646: 9612: 9611: 9610: 9609: 9608: 9607: 9606: 9605: 9604: 9603: 9602: 9601: 9600: 9599: 9577: 9576: 9575: 9574: 9573: 9572: 9571: 9570: 9569: 9568: 9567: 9566: 9565: 9564: 9541: 9540: 9539: 9538: 9537: 9536: 9535: 9534: 9533: 9532: 9531: 9530: 9509: 9508: 9507: 9506: 9505: 9504: 9503: 9502: 9501: 9500: 9466: 9465: 9464: 9463: 9462: 9461: 9460: 9459: 9435: 9434: 9433: 9432: 9390: 9389: 9388: 9387: 9365:deleted at TFD 9361:Category:Stubs 9353: 9352: 9351: 9350: 9349: 9348: 9341: 9317: 9316: 9309: 9284: 9283: 9279: 9278: 9275: 9270: 9268: 9267: 9263: 9262: 9238: 9235: 9233: 9231: 9230: 9206: 9203: 9201: 9199: 9198: 9182: 9181: 9180: 9179: 9129: 9128: 9114: 9113: 9095: 9094: 9093: 9092: 9075: 9074: 9037: 9034: 9033: 9032: 9023:Current events 8990: 8987: 8986: 8985: 8976: 8947: 8924: 8921: 8920: 8919: 8918: 8917: 8902: 8859: 8844: 8843: 8842: 8841: 8840: 8839: 8838: 8837: 8836: 8835: 8825: 8824: 8823: 8822: 8821: 8760: 8753: 8752: 8740: 8720: 8719: 8690: 8689: 8676: 8675: 8674: 8673: 8672: 8671: 8670: 8669: 8632: 8571: 8570: 8555: 8554: 8550: 8549: 8503: 8493: 8446: 8443: 8442: 8441: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8401: 8400: 8399: 8363: 8362: 8361: 8346: 8325: 8324: 8323: 8322: 8321: 8320: 8319: 8318: 8317: 8316: 8305: 8304: 8225: 8224: 8223: 8222: 8221: 8220: 8207: 8182: 8181: 8180: 8179: 8111: 8106: 8104: 8069: 8066: 8065: 8064: 8063: 8062: 8061: 8060: 8059: 8058: 8057: 8056: 8055: 8054: 8053: 8052: 8051: 8050: 8026:Special:Search 8002: 8001: 8000: 7999: 7998: 7997: 7996: 7995: 7994: 7993: 7992: 7991: 7990: 7989: 7966: 7965: 7964: 7963: 7962: 7961: 7960: 7959: 7958: 7957: 7956: 7955: 7916: 7915: 7914: 7913: 7912: 7911: 7910: 7909: 7908: 7907: 7872: 7871: 7870: 7869: 7868: 7867: 7866: 7865: 7840: 7839: 7838: 7837: 7824: 7823: 7822: 7821: 7765:The preceding 7759: 7758: 7754: 7751: 7748: 7745: 7737: 7734: 7733: 7732: 7702: 7699: 7698: 7697: 7686: 7685: 7684: 7683: 7667: 7666: 7645: 7642: 7641: 7640: 7639: 7638: 7584: 7581: 7580: 7579: 7559: 7558: 7507: 7504: 7472: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7464: 7463: 7462: 7461: 7460: 7459: 7438: 7437: 7436: 7435: 7434: 7433: 7418: 7417: 7416: 7415: 7414: 7413: 7399: 7398: 7397: 7396: 7382: 7381: 7380: 7379: 7367: 7366: 7318: 7314: 7313: 7304: 7303: 7265: 7260: 7258: 7237:reference desk 7228: 7225: 7217: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7203: 7196: 7195: 7187: 7186: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7142: 7125: 7112: 7105: 7098: 7089: 7077: 7076: 7075: 7063: 7041: 7034: 7023: 7014: 6988: 6985: 6983: 6964: 6959: 6957: 6955: 6954: 6953: 6952: 6933: 6926:somewhere else 6902: 6899: 6898: 6897: 6896: 6895: 6856:compound like 6852: 6849: 6837: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6810: 6787: 6786: 6785: 6749:Current events 6742: 6741: 6707:Current events 6696: 6693: 6676: 6673: 6671: 6669: 6668: 6596: 6593: 6591: 6560: 6557: 6555: 6553: 6552: 6543: 6542: 6541: 6529: 6528: 6527: 6526: 6519: 6518: 6517: 6516: 6509: 6508: 6498: 6497: 6496: 6495: 6482: 6481: 6439: 6436: 6424: 6421: 6409: 6406: 6404: 6402: 6401: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6356: 6353: 6352: 6351: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6331: 6330: 6279: 6278: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6248: 6247: 6246: 6216: 6215: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6191: 6190: 6189: 6188: 6187: 6186: 6153: 6152: 6151: 6150: 6120: 6119: 6107: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6057: 6054: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6034: 6033: 6014: 5972: 5971: 5959: 5958: 5947:, not so much 5896: 5895: 5884: 5883: 5874: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5855: 5851: 5844: 5837: 5836: 5777: 5774: 5772: 5747: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5740: 5729: 5728: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5699: 5698: 5682: 5681: 5673: 5644: 5633: 5628: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5608: 5607: 5568: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5524: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5507: 5494: 5493: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5447: 5446: 5432: 5415: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5397: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5341:Administrators 5309: 5306: 5305: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5256: 5240: 5237: 5235: 5215: 5212: 5201: 5198: 5196: 5193: 5191: 5189: 5188: 5179: 5151: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5107: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5062: 5061: 4991: 4988: 4986: 4984: 4983: 4947: 4944: 4933: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4914: 4913: 4903:Well, it's at 4881: 4880: 4844: 4843: 4818: 4817: 4805: 4794: 4779: 4769: 4746: 4745: 4742: 4735: 4732: 4729: 4726: 4723: 4720: 4719:How many edits 4717: 4710: 4707: 4704: 4701: 4698: 4682: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4670:badlydrawnjeff 4654: 4602:badlydrawnjeff 4598: 4597: 4589: 4588: 4583: 4582: 4543: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4482:lengthen it. 4472: 4471: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4335: 4325: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4272: 4251: 4241:that a OS can 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4214: 4190: 4189: 4170: 4169: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4155: 4119: 4086: 4015: 4014: 3991: 3985: 3958: 3953: 3951: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3883: 3875:administrators 3809: 3806: 3787: 3786: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3684: 3683: 3676: 3642: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3619: 3618: 3608: 3599: 3563: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3506: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3468: 3467: 3443: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3427: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3379: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3348:Yellowmellow45 3342: 3339: 3337: 3330:66.229.183.101 3324: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3255: 3254: 3223: 3221: 3214: 3205: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3190: 3189: 3180: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3145: 3144: 3085: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 2975: 2974: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2929: 2928: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2861: 2860: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2818: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2790: 2789: 2780: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2757: 2756: 2726: 2725: 2718: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2700: 2699: 2690: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2670: 2669: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2624: 2623: 2595: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2551:Dragons flight 2543: 2526: 2488:Be eudaimonic! 2477:vécut heureuse 2475: 2468:Joshua Gardner 2454: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2302: 2299: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2242: 2241: 2228: 2193: 2190: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2139: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2061: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2005: 2003: 1996:Samuel Wantman 1988: 1987: 1976: 1975: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1948: 1947: 1925:Samuel Wantman 1913: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1861: 1838: 1814: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1768: 1767: 1754: 1753: 1748:Samuel Wantman 1722: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1597: 1596: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1530:Dragons flight 1520: 1519: 1503:Dragons flight 1494: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1417: 1416: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1330: 1329: 1319: 1318: 1308: 1307: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1231:Mark all edits 1223: 1222: 1208: 1207: 1179:Any comments? 1139: 1136: 92: 76: 75: 73: 72: 71: 70: 65: 60: 55: 43: 38: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 10129: 10120: 10119: 10116: 10113: 10101: 10097: 10092: 10090: 10086: 10081: 10080: 10079: 10078: 10074: 10065: 10062: 10059: 10058: 10057: 10054: 10047: 10044: 10043: 10042: 10034: 10031: 10030: 10027: 10023: 10011: 10008: 10004: 10000: 9996: 9995: 9994: 9991: 9989: 9981: 9978: 9975: 9974: 9973: 9970: 9966: 9957: 9956: 9953: 9946: 9943: 9939: 9933: 9928: 9924: 9920: 9916: 9912: 9910: 9909: 9908: 9899: 9896: 9892: 9888: 9882: 9880: 9876: 9870: 9868: 9863: 9861: 9857: 9853: 9852: 9851: 9850: 9847: 9840: 9837: 9833: 9832: 9831: 9830: 9827: 9822: 9813: 9810: 9809: 9806: 9802: 9798: 9794: 9784: 9771: 9768: 9764: 9763: 9762: 9761: 9760: 9759: 9758: 9757: 9756: 9755: 9746: 9743: 9739: 9738: 9737: 9736: 9735: 9734: 9733: 9732: 9725: 9722: 9718: 9717: 9716: 9715: 9714: 9713: 9706: 9703: 9698: 9697: 9696: 9695: 9694: 9693: 9688: 9685: 9681: 9680: 9679: 9678: 9675: 9672: 9667: 9666: 9665: 9664: 9661: 9650: 9645: 9642: 9638: 9634: 9630: 9626: 9625: 9624: 9623: 9620: 9616: 9598: 9595: 9591: 9590: 9589: 9588: 9587: 9586: 9585: 9584: 9583: 9582: 9581: 9580: 9579: 9578: 9563: 9560: 9555: 9554: 9553: 9552: 9551: 9550: 9549: 9548: 9547: 9546: 9545: 9544: 9543: 9542: 9529: 9526: 9521: 9520: 9519: 9518: 9517: 9516: 9515: 9514: 9513: 9512: 9511: 9510: 9499: 9494: 9490: 9485: 9481: 9476: 9475: 9474: 9473: 9472: 9471: 9470: 9469: 9468: 9467: 9458: 9455: 9451: 9450: 9449: 9446: 9441: 9440: 9439: 9438: 9437: 9436: 9431: 9426: 9422: 9417: 9413: 9409: 9405: 9402: 9398: 9394: 9393: 9392: 9391: 9386: 9383: 9378: 9377: 9376: 9373: 9370: 9366: 9362: 9358: 9355: 9354: 9347: 9344: 9339: 9335: 9331: 9330: 9329: 9326: 9321: 9320: 9319: 9318: 9315: 9312: 9307: 9302: 9301: 9300: 9299: 9296: 9290: 9287: 9281: 9280: 9276: 9273: 9272: 9271: 9265: 9264: 9260: 9259: 9258: 9256: 9251: 9248: 9243: 9234: 9229: 9226: 9222: 9218: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9211: 9210:considering. 9202: 9197: 9194: 9189: 9184: 9183: 9178: 9175: 9172: 9167: 9166: 9165: 9162: 9155: 9150: 9143: 9139: 9135: 9131: 9130: 9126: 9125: 9120: 9116: 9115: 9112: 9109: 9106: 9102: 9101:Freedom House 9097: 9096: 9089: 9085: 9079: 9078: 9077: 9076: 9073: 9070: 9066: 9062: 9058: 9054: 9053: 9052: 9049: 9045: 9031: 9028: 9024: 9020: 9019: 9018: 9017: 9014: 9011:Comments? -- 9009: 9005: 9001: 8999: 8996: 8984: 8981: 8977: 8975: 8972: 8969: 8965: 8961: 8960: 8959: 8957: 8952: 8949: 8945: 8942: 8939: 8936: 8933: 8932: 8928: 8915: 8910: 8909: 8908: 8905: 8900: 8896: 8891: 8890: 8889: 8887: 8883: 8879: 8875: 8871: 8866: 8865: 8862: 8857: 8853: 8849: 8834: 8831: 8830:Johantheghost 8826: 8820: 8817: 8815: 8810: 8809: 8808: 8803: 8798: 8794: 8793:bugzilla:2285 8790: 8789: 8788: 8785: 8783: 8779: 8778: 8777: 8774: 8773:Johantheghost 8770: 8765: 8761: 8757: 8756: 8755: 8754: 8751: 8748: 8746: 8741: 8739: 8736: 8734: 8729: 8724: 8723: 8722: 8721: 8718: 8715: 8714:Johantheghost 8711: 8707: 8703: 8699: 8694: 8693: 8692: 8691: 8688: 8685: 8683: 8678: 8677: 8668: 8665: 8663: 8659: 8655: 8651: 8647: 8643: 8642: 8641: 8638: 8637:Johantheghost 8633: 8629: 8628: 8627: 8622: 8617: 8613: 8609: 8605: 8601: 8600: 8599: 8596: 8595:Johantheghost 8592: 8587: 8586: 8585: 8584: 8581: 8580:algumacoisaqq 8576: 8569: 8566: 8565:Johantheghost 8561: 8557: 8556: 8552: 8551: 8547: 8543: 8539: 8535: 8534: 8533: 8532: 8529: 8524: 8517: 8516: 8513: 8512:Johantheghost 8508: 8502: 8499: 8492: 8489: 8487: 8483: 8479: 8475: 8471: 8466: 8464: 8460: 8456: 8452: 8440: 8437: 8433: 8428: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8421: 8415: 8410: 8398: 8395: 8391: 8387: 8383: 8378: 8377: 8376: 8373: 8371: 8369: 8364: 8359: 8355: 8351: 8347: 8344: 8343: 8341: 8340: 8339: 8336: 8332: 8327: 8326: 8315: 8312: 8307: 8306: 8303: 8300: 8298: 8296: 8290: 8289: 8288: 8285: 8283: 8281: 8274: 8269: 8265: 8261: 8257: 8256: 8255: 8252: 8248: 8244: 8240: 8236: 8231: 8230: 8229: 8228: 8227: 8226: 8219: 8216: 8214: 8212: 8205: 8200: 8199: 8198: 8195: 8191: 8186: 8185: 8184: 8183: 8178: 8175: 8173: 8171: 8165: 8161: 8157: 8156: 8155: 8150: 8141: 8140: 8139: 8138: 8135: 8133: 8131: 8125: 8121: 8117: 8116: 8110: 8105: 8102: 8100: 8097: 8093: 8090: 8088: 8083: 8082: 8078: 8076: 8049: 8044: 8040: 8035: 8031: 8027: 8022: 8018: 8017: 8016: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8011: 8010: 8009: 8008: 8007: 8006: 8005: 8004: 8003: 7988: 7985: 7980: 7979: 7978: 7977: 7976: 7975: 7974: 7973: 7972: 7971: 7970: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7954: 7949: 7945: 7940: 7935: 7931: 7928: 7927: 7926: 7925: 7924: 7923: 7922: 7921: 7920: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7906: 7901: 7897: 7892: 7887: 7882: 7881: 7880: 7879: 7878: 7877: 7876: 7875: 7874: 7873: 7864: 7861: 7856: 7855: 7854: 7851: 7846: 7845: 7844: 7843: 7842: 7841: 7836: 7833: 7828: 7827: 7826: 7825: 7820: 7817: 7813: 7809: 7808: 7807: 7804: 7800: 7796: 7791: 7786: 7785: 7784: 7781: 7777: 7773: 7772:65.31.187.201 7770: 7768: 7755: 7752: 7749: 7746: 7743: 7742: 7741: 7736:some ideas... 7731: 7727: 7723: 7719: 7718: 7717: 7716: 7713: 7707: 7696: 7693: 7688: 7687: 7682: 7679: 7676: 7671: 7670: 7669: 7668: 7665: 7662: 7658: 7657: 7656: 7655: 7652: 7637: 7634: 7630: 7626: 7622: 7621: 7620: 7617: 7612: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7606: 7602: 7601:piston engine 7598: 7594: 7590: 7578: 7575: 7573: 7569: 7565: 7561: 7560: 7557: 7554: 7547: 7542: 7535: 7532: 7531: 7530: 7529: 7526: 7524: 7518: 7516: 7503: 7502: 7499: 7478: 7471: 7458: 7455: 7451: 7446: 7445: 7444: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7432: 7429: 7424: 7423: 7422: 7421: 7420: 7419: 7412: 7409: 7405: 7404: 7403: 7402: 7401: 7400: 7395: 7392: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7378: 7375: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7365: 7362: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7352: 7348: 7347: 7342: 7337: 7334: 7332: 7328: 7324: 7317: 7311: 7306: 7305: 7302: 7299: 7295: 7290: 7289: 7288: 7287: 7284: 7280: 7276: 7271: 7264: 7259: 7256: 7254: 7250: 7246: 7242: 7238: 7234: 7224: 7223: 7220: 7215: 7211: 7202:anti-school). 7200: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7193: 7189: 7188: 7181: 7178: 7177: 7173: 7171: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7161: 7157: 7153: 7152: 7150: 7147: 7143: 7141: 7138: 7137: 7130: 7126: 7124: 7121: 7119: 7113: 7111: 7108: 7103: 7099: 7097: 7094: 7090: 7088: 7085: 7081: 7078: 7074: 7070: 7064: 7060: 7056: 7051: 7050: 7049: 7046: 7044: 7039: 7035: 7033: 7028: 7024: 7022: 7019: 7015: 7013: 7009: 7004: 7003: 7002: 7001: 6998: 6993: 6984: 6981: 6980: 6977: 6975: 6971: 6963: 6958: 6951: 6948: 6944: 6943: 6942: 6939: 6934: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6920: 6917: 6913: 6909: 6894: 6891: 6888: 6884: 6880: 6879: 6878: 6875: 6871: 6867: 6863: 6862: 6861: 6859: 6848: 6847: 6844: 6836: 6834: 6830: 6820: 6817: 6814: 6808: 6802: 6798: 6797: 6796: 6793: 6788: 6784: 6779: 6771: 6767: 6764:; please see 6760: 6753: 6750: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6740: 6737: 6733: 6728: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6721: 6718: 6713: 6710: 6708: 6703: 6692: 6690: 6686: 6682: 6672: 6667: 6664: 6660: 6656: 6652: 6648: 6647: 6646: 6645: 6641: 6637: 6633: 6629: 6625: 6620: 6618: 6614: 6610: 6606: 6602: 6592: 6589: 6588: 6584: 6580: 6576: 6572: 6568: 6567: 6556: 6551: 6548: 6544: 6540: 6537: 6533: 6532: 6531: 6530: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6515:they expect?" 6513: 6512: 6511: 6510: 6507: 6504: 6500: 6499: 6494: 6491: 6486: 6485: 6484: 6483: 6480: 6477: 6473: 6468: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6462: 6457: 6454: 6450: 6447: 6443: 6435: 6434: 6431: 6420: 6419: 6416: 6405: 6400: 6396: 6395: 6394: 6393: 6390: 6385: 6376: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6366: 6362: 6344: 6340: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6329: 6326: 6319: 6316: 6312: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6300: 6292: 6288: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6277: 6273: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6261: 6245: 6242: 6238: 6234: 6230: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6208: 6204: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6185: 6182: 6179: 6175: 6171: 6167: 6163: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6154: 6149: 6145: 6140: 6136: 6132: 6128: 6124: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6118: 6114: 6109: 6108: 6103: 6100: 6097: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6087: 6083: 6082: 6081: 6080: 6076: 6071: 6067: 6062: 6049: 6046: 6042: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6035: 6032: 6028: 6026: 6020: 6015: 6013: 6009: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5990: 5984: 5980: 5976: 5969: 5966: 5961: 5960: 5957: 5954: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5936: 5931: 5928: 5924: 5922: 5917: 5913: 5910: 5906: 5902: 5899: 5892: 5889: 5886: 5885: 5882: 5879: 5875: 5872: 5871: 5866: 5862: 5856: 5852: 5849: 5848:public domain 5845: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5834: 5831: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5822: 5821: 5818: 5813: 5810: 5807: 5804: 5800: 5798: 5794: 5791: 5787: 5784: 5781: 5773: 5770: 5769: 5766: 5759: 5756: 5752: 5739: 5736: 5731: 5730: 5727: 5724: 5723:Johantheghost 5720: 5716: 5715: 5710: 5707: 5706:Johantheghost 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5697: 5694: 5693:Johantheghost 5690: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5671: 5666: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5655: 5650: 5643: 5641: 5632: 5620: 5617: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5606: 5603: 5600: 5597: 5593: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5583: 5578: 5573: 5557: 5554: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5544: 5539: 5538: 5536: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5522: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5508: 5506: 5503: 5502: 5500: 5496: 5495: 5492: 5489: 5485: 5481: 5476: 5475: 5470: 5467: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5458: 5453: 5449: 5448: 5445: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5424: 5420: 5414:Dewey Decimal 5408: 5405: 5401: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5389: 5387: 5381: 5379: 5367: 5364: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5350: 5349: 5346: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5328: 5326: 5320: 5318: 5301: 5298: 5295: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5286: 5281: 5280: 5275: 5272: 5271:24.26.178.224 5267: 5266: 5265: 5262: 5257: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5247: 5246:24.26.178.224 5236: 5233: 5232: 5229: 5226: 5222: 5211: 5210: 5208: 5192: 5187: 5184: 5182: 5177: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5167: 5160: 5157: 5150: 5141: 5138: 5134: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5124: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5114: 5099: 5093: 5089: 5087: 5086: 5079: 5074: 5072: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5060: 5057: 5054: 5049: 5045: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5032: 5028: 5026: 5025: 5018: 5013: 5011: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4987: 4982: 4978: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4966: 4963: 4958: 4957: 4954: 4943: 4942: 4939: 4927: 4924: 4920: 4916: 4915: 4912: 4909: 4905: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4896: 4890: 4889: 4886: 4885:202.7.166.171 4879: 4876: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4865: 4864:algumacoisaqq 4860: 4859: 4856: 4853: 4849: 4848:Daniel Brandt 4842: 4837: 4836: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4823: 4815: 4810: 4806: 4803: 4799: 4795: 4792: 4788: 4784: 4780: 4777: 4774: 4770: 4767: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4750: 4743: 4740: 4736: 4733: 4730: 4727: 4724: 4721: 4718: 4715: 4711: 4708: 4705: 4702: 4699: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4690: 4688: 4674: 4671: 4667: 4666:Rolling Stone 4663: 4659: 4655: 4652: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4643: 4636: 4633: 4628: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4619: 4616: 4612: 4607: 4606: 4603: 4595: 4591: 4590: 4585: 4584: 4580: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4571: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4556:Brian Peppers 4553: 4549: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4506: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4498: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4481: 4477: 4470: 4467: 4464: 4460: 4452: 4447: 4442: 4438: 4436: 4430: 4428: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4417: 4415: 4411: 4406: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4394: 4389: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4367: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4349: 4346: 4342: 4337: 4334:<span: --> 4333: 4331: 4317: 4314: 4310: 4305: 4304: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4294: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4283: 4280: 4271: 4270: 4267: 4264: 4260: 4250: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4229: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4217: 4211: 4207: 4202: 4199: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4188: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4172: 4171: 4158: 4152: 4148: 4143: 4140: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4129: 4124: 4123: 4122: 4116: 4112: 4107: 4104: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4096: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4083: 4079: 4074: 4071: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4056: 4049: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4028: 4025: 4020: 4013: 4011: 4007: 4003: 4001: 3998: 3992: 3989: 3983: 3979: 3978: 3975: 3973: 3966: 3957: 3952: 3945: 3942: 3937: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3927: 3920: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3908: 3901: 3898: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3888: 3886: 3881: 3877: 3876: 3871: 3870: 3865: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3855: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3844: 3837: 3834: 3829: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3814: 3805: 3804: 3801: 3800:Johantheghost 3796: 3795: 3792: 3785: 3782: 3777: 3771: 3768: 3765: 3762: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3747: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3726: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3708: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3697: 3692: 3687: 3681: 3677: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3670: 3665: 3663: 3659: 3649: 3634: 3631: 3630:Johantheghost 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3614: 3609: 3607: 3604: 3600: 3598: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3584: 3583:Aapo Laitinen 3579: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3557: 3554: 3552: 3547: 3546: 3539: 3535: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3517: 3513: 3507: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3485: 3481: 3476: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3448: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3389: 3388:168.131.46.80 3385: 3371: 3368: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3349: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3331: 3314: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3302: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3281: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3251: 3248: 3239: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3222: 3213: 3212: 3209: 3199: 3196: 3195:129.67.18.124 3192: 3191: 3188: 3185: 3183: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3143: 3140: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3124: 3119: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3098: 3097:Porridge (TV) 3094: 3089: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3018: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2976: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2952: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2927: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2903:Bunchofgrapes 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2889: 2886: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2874: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2840:Bunchofgrapes 2837: 2826: 2823: 2821: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2802: 2799: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2778: 2774: 2773: 2768: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2721: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2692: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2671: 2668: 2665: 2658: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2637: 2627: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2605: 2601: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2570: 2567: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2542: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2469: 2464: 2460: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2422: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2400: 2398: 2388: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2371: 2369: 2364: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2321: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2307: 2298: 2296: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2279: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2240: 2236: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2219: 2214: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2199: 2189: 2180: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2165: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2140: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2039: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2022: 2009: 2004: 2001: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1983: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1883: 1870: 1866: 1857: 1855: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1834: 1832: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1810: 1808: 1802: 1801:The talk page 1795: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1756: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1729: 1716: 1712: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1666: 1664: 1658: 1656: 1651: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1620: 1616: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1601: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1588: 1577: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1490: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1472: 1464: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1429: 1426: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1148: 1143: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96: 91: 89: 85: 69: 68:Miscellaneous 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 52: 47: 44: 42: 39: 37: 34: 33: 32: 31: 27: 26: 19: 10109: 10069: 10055: 10051: 10040: 10032: 10019: 9997:Knowledge's 9992: 9985: 9971: 9967: 9963: 9960:WikiQuestion 9949: 9902: 9886: 9860:Revision.php 9843: 9823: 9819: 9811: 9790: 9782: 9656: 9648: 9613: 9333: 9291: 9288: 9285: 9269: 9252: 9246: 9244: 9240: 9232: 9212: 9208: 9200: 9187: 9122: 9039: 9010: 9006: 9002: 8992: 8953: 8950: 8946: 8943: 8940: 8937: 8934: 8929: 8926: 8894: 8881: 8880:. They are 8874:CategoryTree 8869: 8867: 8845: 8763: 8705: 8645: 8611: 8572: 8559: 8518: 8509: 8506: 8500: 8496: 8490: 8485: 8477: 8473: 8467: 8462: 8448: 8408: 8405: 8385: 8381: 8357: 8353: 8349: 8272: 8267: 8263: 8259: 8203: 8163: 8126: 8122: 8118: 8114: 8113: 8103: 8094: 8091: 8086: 8084: 8079: 8074: 8071: 7795:cite sources 7789: 7764: 7760: 7739: 7708: 7704: 7647: 7586: 7522: 7514: 7509: 7474: 7344: 7340: 7338: 7335: 7330: 7326: 7321: 7315: 7309: 7269: 7267: 7257: 7230: 7209: 7207: 7175: 7169: 7132: 7040: 6994: 6990: 6982: 6966: 6956: 6925: 6911: 6904: 6868:. HTH HAND — 6858:Polyethylene 6854: 6840: 6825: 6751: 6731: 6726: 6714: 6711: 6698: 6680: 6678: 6670: 6621: 6616: 6604: 6601:Craig Gannon 6598: 6590: 6564: 6562: 6554: 6547:62.31.55.223 6458: 6455: 6451: 6448: 6444: 6441: 6426: 6411: 6403: 6381: 6374: 6364: 6358: 6256: 6173: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6138: 6134: 6130: 6126: 6069: 6063: 6059: 6024: 5985: 5981: 5977: 5973: 5932: 5929: 5925: 5920: 5918: 5914: 5911: 5907: 5903: 5900: 5897: 5823: 5814: 5811: 5808: 5805: 5801: 5796: 5795: 5792: 5788: 5785: 5782: 5779: 5771: 5749: 5735:Joris Gillis 5668: 5664: 5638: 5636: 5630: 5579: 5574: 5570: 5417: 5385: 5377: 5372: 5324: 5316: 5311: 5242: 5234: 5217: 5204: 5203: 5190: 5178: 5153: 5137:Joris Gillis 5109: 5091: 5084: 5083: 5077: 5070: 5069: 5030: 5023: 5022: 5016: 5009: 5008: 4993: 4985: 4959: 4949: 4935: 4891: 4882: 4861: 4845: 4833: 4819: 4814:the Signpost 4808: 4782: 4772: 4757: 4751: 4747: 4691: 4686: 4684: 4657: 4608: 4599: 4572: 4560:Raptor Jesus 4545: 4484: 4479: 4475: 4473: 4432: 4424: 4404: 4353: 4350: 4347: 4338: 4327: 4302: 4301: 4276: 4255: 4242: 4235: 4227: 4176:of the image 4175: 4067: 4063: 4040: 4036: 4021: 4018: 3995: 3993: 3960: 3950: 3941:Peace Inside 3935: 3882: 3874: 3873: 3868: 3867: 3863: 3830: 3818:mailing list 3815: 3811: 3797: 3788: 3688: 3685: 3666: 3654: 3580: 3565: 3502: 3498: 3444: 3429: 3381: 3344: 3336: 3326: 3277: 3272: 3269: 3266: 3258: 3243: 3225: 3207: 3179: 3127: 3120: 3110: 3108: 3105: 3090: 3087: 3062: 2991: 2948: 2901:afraid :-( — 2833: 2817: 2779: 2745: 2741: 2730: 2727: 2701: 2694: 2633: 2625: 2599: 2597: 2574:82.7.125.142 2571: 2563: 2547:foundation-l 2529: 2456: 2401: 2394: 2386: 2372: 2361:The current 2360: 2327: 2319: 2304: 2282: 2275: 2217: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2195: 2187: 2115: 2035: 2026: 2020: 2018: 2013: 2008:The Simpsons 2007: 2002: 1989: 1916: 1914: 1891: 1884: 1880: 1798: 1724: 1705: 1697: 1679: 1675: 1669: 1667: 1659: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1638: 1635: 1628: 1598: 1586: 1583: 1575: 1551: 1496: 1488: 1474: 1406: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1181: 1178: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1153: 1151: 1146: 1144: 1141: 276: 145: 97: 93: 81: 30:Village pump 28: 8358:conclusions 8311:Will Beback 8158:Please see 6595:Proposition 6166:unprotected 6135:Unprotected 5953:Kim Bruning 5551:article. ( 5259:automatic. 5225:Steve block 5046:, though. — 4938:Username132 4919:| e-mail me 4766:wikipedians 4762:Esperanza's 4463:violet/riga 4351:Comments? 4226:GPL Covers 4037:source code 3997:copyrighted 3864:no big deal 3403:Banana04131 3358:Banana04131 2330:sockpuppets 2324:Sockpuppets 1933:Nice idea. 1629:I see that 1169:Proposal B: 1154:Proposal A: 9879:serialized 9797:evaluating 9684:Kevin Ryde 9660:Kevin Ryde 9633:inputboxes 9619:Kevin Baas 9205:Volatility 9084:Pattersonc 9044:Pattersonc 8941:into this 8797:Rick Block 8616:Rick Block 8419:Μελ Ετητης 8414:Mel Etitis 8386:hoi polloi 7984:Kevin Baas 7605:Ma.rkus.nl 7589:image maps 7583:Image maps 7270:department 7055:Pattersonc 6997:Kingturtle 6992:slip by. 6887:Physchim62 6804:This one → 6770:Flcelloguy 6291:Flcelloguy 6125:How about 6045:EurekaLott 5790:interest. 5567:References 5294:Physchim62 5048:Kirill Lok 4875:Witty lama 4835:talk to me 4822:Witty lama 4798:Milestones 4739:categories 4491:2006-01-17 4441:Rick Block 4388:Rick Block 4360:2006-01-16 4068:screenshot 4041:screenshot 4010:Copyrights 3869:power user 3759:Try here. 3457:Rob Church 3259:with this 3227:neutrality 3139:Witty lama 3088:Hi there, 2996:Rob Church 2988:preference 2675:Rob Church 2636:block list 2375:Rob Church 2289:2006-01-25 1547:Toolserver 1274:Rick Block 1239:by default 1195:Rick Block 1174:minor edit 100:Archives: 51:persistent 10003:Superm401 9952:Infinity0 9846:Infinity0 9826:Infinity0 9803:for FAC. 9637:Superm401 9629:this link 9065:Superm401 8882:wonderful 8852:bug #2725 8848:bug #1775 8575:hardcoded 8488:sailors. 8432:Johnleemk 8390:Johnleemk 8382:certified 8367:brenneman 8331:Johnleemk 8294:brenneman 8279:brenneman 8210:brenneman 8169:brenneman 8129:brenneman 7934:usability 7799:Johnleemk 7726:Catherine 7534:Mediawiki 7346:Welcoming 7310:narration 7241:help desk 7156:Carbonite 6659:Incidents 6525:eternity. 6503:JWSchmidt 6365:something 6174:protected 6170:unprotect 6139:Protected 6127:Protected 5670:Cyde Weys 5616:Supercoop 5582:Supercoop 5526:See also 5466:IanDavies 5423:IanDavies 5042:There is 4990:New Users 4953:Lcarsdata 4846:Just ask 4783:community 4771:It would 4725:Admin/etc 4681:WP Census 4587:audience. 4529:Superm401 4374:Superm401 4309:Superm401 4180:Superm401 3658:euphemism 3509:policies. 3075:Infinity0 3045:Superm401 3032:Infinity0 3010:Superm401 2990:entitled 2980:bug #4611 2965:Superm401 2951:Infinity0 2923:Infinity0 2855:Infinity0 2764:Infinity0 2732:Infinity0 2652:already. 2616:for one.- 2581:Superm401 2534:Superm401 2440:Superm401 1655:moderated 1556:unit test 1425:Cuivienen 46:Proposals 41:Technical 10096:Cool Cat 10085:Cool Cat 10073:Cool Cat 10026:Edivorce 9917:revision 9615:WikiNews 9493:contribs 9425:contribs 9027:Awolf002 9013:SGBailey 8980:Rmhermen 8700:but not 8658:fair use 8354:evidence 8273:requires 8243:WP:CIVIL 8148:Jtkiefer 8043:contribs 7948:contribs 7900:contribs 7780:contribs 7767:unsigned 7597:pediment 7515:Alfakim 7454:Przykuta 7450:archives 7408:Przykuta 7374:Przykuta 7351:Przykuta 7283:Przykuta 7245:enochlau 7129:Grutness 7114:Done. -- 7084:Awolf002 7038:nae'blis 6657:and its 6536:Tomandlu 6490:Tomandlu 6461:Tomandlu 6389:Tobacman 6070:increase 5843:know...) 5815:Thanks. 5719:WP:MOS-L 5436:Shimgray 5378:Alfakim 5337:rollback 5317:Alfakim 5176:nae'blis 4994:We have 4962:User:Zoe 4852:User:Zoe 4758:it's fun 4756:Firstly 4658:internet 4615:User:Zoe 4552:WP:MUSIC 4435:User:Foo 4427:User:Foo 4405:provided 4341:User:Foo 4210:CONTRIBS 4151:CONTRIBS 4115:CONTRIBS 4082:CONTRIBS 4064:software 3880:nae'blis 3764:Garion96 3736:Skysmith 3686:Thanks, 3447:PlaneMad 3341:Printing 3231:disputed 3177:nae'blis 3129:Iancaddy 2936:Garion96 2815:nae'blis 2777:nae'blis 2650:Bugzilla 2357:Blocking 2346:though. 2261:User:Zoe 2249:Garion96 2198:ISO 8601 2173:User:Zoe 2159:Jarlaxle 2084:User:Zoe 1853:xaosflux 1830:xaosflux 1806:xaosflux 1742:I had a 1471:Grutness 1403:Grutness 1337:jnothman 1259:jnothman 1255:contribs 1183:jnothman 58:Idea lab 9887:another 9875:gzipped 9805:Tuf-Kat 9594:W.marsh 9525:W.marsh 9445:W.marsh 9382:W.marsh 9369:Cryptic 9325:W.marsh 9295:W.marsh 8654:WP:FORK 8612:content 8608:mirrors 7757:public. 7678:Raul654 7572:GraemeL 7390:Eluchil 7325:with a 7146:SEWilco 6883:WP:Chem 6813:Cryptic 6705:on the 6663:gadfium 6636:Deskana 6571:Talrias 6415:Rebroad 6361:figures 6287:be bold 6162:protect 6131:Protect 5965:SEWilco 5878:Bjtitus 5830:SEWilco 5780:Folks: 5689:Panamax 5640:Article 5553:SEWilco 5532:SEWilco 5518:SEWilco 5431:a) Yes. 5358:the wub 5285:gadfium 5113:Slashme 4787:chapter 4773:help us 4611:WP:MEME 4594:Foxtrot 4548:WP:CORP 4476:shorten 4062:If the 3707:Patrick 3662:nirvana 3603:gadfium 3594:gadfium 3301:Mr Spum 3280:Dabljuh 3065:Slashme 2742:warning 2709:...done 2618:gadfium 2614:WP:CDVF 2530:defense 2162:Artemis 2066:drumguy 1600:Mr Spum 1463:User AI 1356:Patrick 1324:Patrick 1313:Patrick 1302:Patrick 1253:) and ( 1217:Patrick 1147:sort of 10115:Ksenon 9942:cesarb 9929:object 9895:cesarb 9871:object 9866:table 9836:cesarb 9767:Kjkolb 9721:Kjkolb 9671:Golbez 9559:JackyR 9484:Kmf164 9416:Kmf164 9372:(talk) 9342:seance 9310:seance 9255:WP:AFC 9174:(talk) 9108:(talk) 8971:(Talk) 8903:seance 8860:seance 8764:really 8728:WP:AWB 8652:. See 8239:WP:NPA 8235:WP:AGF 8160:WP:CIV 8034:Kmf164 7939:Kmf164 7891:Kmf164 7860:Taxman 7832:Taxman 7651:Krisse 7633:SimonP 7218:seance 7106:seance 7093:Martin 7043:(talk) 7027:Splash 6938:Kjkolb 6890:(talk) 6816:(talk) 6809:|thumb 6752:should 6702:RedHat 6640:(talk) 6632:WP:AIV 6613:WP:AIV 6609:WP:AIV 6428:them. 6318:adiant 5989:Jaffer 5983:soon. 5935:Jaffer 5921:STREAM 5888:Jaffer 5817:Jaffer 5758:adiant 5599:Harald 5457:Andjam 5297:(talk) 5181:(talk) 5159:adiant 5135:8.51-- 5073:murray 5012:murray 4946:Murger 4908:Pharos 4895:Pharos 4893:yet.-- 4791:meetup 4709:Gender 4635:adiant 4627:WP:WEB 4525:User:Y 4521:User:Y 4517:User:X 4513:User:X 4509:User:Y 4505:User:X 4410:WP:AUM 4008:. See 3919:adiant 3885:(talk) 3836:adiant 3822:WP:RFA 3767:(talk) 3182:(talk) 2939:(talk) 2820:(talk) 2798:JackyR 2782:(talk) 2657:adiant 2640:Ixfd64 2604:Ixfd64 2600:bolded 2435:ArbCom 2348:Martin 2334:Graham 2252:(talk) 2223:Daelin 2218:almost 2143:Splash 2074:speak? 2038:Bwithh 1992:WP:TIO 1970:ddlamb 1919:WP:TIO 1762:cesarb 1698:should 1670:policy 1552:really 1399:WP:RFA 36:Policy 9399:and [ 9138:teach 8350:there 8204:looks 8152:---- 7523:talk 7331:Quest 7172:roken 6843:Heron 6792:Arbor 6777:note? 6759:click 6717:Heron 6628:WP:AN 6624:WP:AN 6324:|< 6323:: --> 6311:WP:AN 6298:note? 6228:list. 5764:|< 5763:: --> 5400:Jerzy 5386:talk 5325:talk 5283:for.- 5255:away. 5165:|< 5164:: --> 5133:Opera 4802:stats 4789:or a 4651:YTMND 4641:|< 4640:: --> 4493:01:40 4487:Quarl 4362:08:09 4356:Quarl 4279:vidar 4263:vidar 4239:a.out 4024:vidar 4000:Linux 3925:|< 3924:: --> 3842:|< 3841:: --> 3750:Green 3746:Terra 3695:Green 3691:Terra 2663:|< 2662:: --> 2500:Compu 2473:Elle 2405:Compu 2291:19:26 2285:Quarl 1940:Green 1936:Terra 1732:lethe 1728:phpBB 1686:Green 1682:Terra 1663:Patch 1443:WP:DR 1270:minor 1235:minor 88:start 16:< 10007:Talk 9934:text 9925:text 9921:text 9913:page 9911:The 9905:text 9893:. -- 9883:text 9864:text 9742:Deco 9702:Deco 9641:Talk 9489:talk 9454:Deco 9421:talk 9410:and 9334:easy 9225:Deco 9193:Deco 9188:both 9140:the 9134:NPOV 9088:Talk 9069:Talk 9048:Talk 8876:and 8802:talk 8650:GFDL 8631:it). 8621:talk 8504:] ] 8486:some 8478:that 8463:that 8436:Talk 8409:pace 8394:Talk 8356:but 8335:Talk 8268:have 8264:need 8260:keep 8241:and 8164:does 8039:talk 7944:talk 7896:talk 7850:Deco 7816:Deco 7803:Talk 7790:that 7776:talk 7692:Deco 7631:. - 7616:Deco 7428:Rayc 7361:Deco 7298:Rayc 7279:here 7275:here 7249:talk 7160:Talk 7135:wha? 7059:Talk 7018:Deco 6947:Deco 6916:Deco 6912:only 6874:Talk 6870:Phil 6838:]]] 6736:Deco 6732:most 6727:very 6476:Deco 6241:Deco 6235:and 6168:and 6141:. — 6086:Deco 6001:and 5799:... 5717:See 5675:vote 5653:Toth 5602:Søby 5590:See 5543:Deco 5488:Deco 5440:talk 5362:"?!" 5261:Deco 5228:talk 5123:Deco 5092:ster 5078:inch 5031:ster 5017:inch 4998:and 4716:...) 4714:P.C. 4533:Talk 4446:talk 4393:talk 4378:Talk 4313:Talk 4293:Deco 4243:view 4206:TALK 4184:Talk 4147:TALK 4128:Deco 4111:TALK 4095:Deco 4078:TALK 4055:Deco 3972:this 3936:have 3897:Deco 3854:Deco 3781:Deco 3716:Sean 3613:Deco 3592:so.- 3572:spam 3516:Deco 3461:talk 3310:Deco 3224:The 3123:here 3111:(TV) 3049:Talk 3014:Talk 3000:talk 2969:Talk 2907:talk 2885:Deco 2844:talk 2751:Deco 2744:and 2679:talk 2585:Talk 2538:Talk 2444:Talk 2379:talk 2373:Ta, 2130:. — 2119:Thut 2112:Poll 2101:Deco 2048:jglc 2027:2005 1982:Deco 1778:? — 1760:. -- 1706:that 1612:. — 1562:. — 1477:wha? 1409:wha? 1296:and 1279:talk 1251:talk 1247:help 1200:talk 9482:. - 9414:. - 9367:. — 9247:not 8993:EG 8895:are 8814:DES 8782:DES 8745:DES 8733:DES 8682:DES 8662:DES 8560:all 8474:and 8247:Doc 8190:Doc 7782:) . 7519:-- 7292:--> 7210:But 7131:... 6974:DES 6605:not 6399:mav 6172:to 6164:to 6137:vs 6129:vs 6019:dab 5648:Aza 5596:Jon 5576:--> 5382:-- 5321:-- 5056:hin 4697:Age 4662:CNN 4550:or 4480:not 4466:(t) 4414:DES 4344:--> 4303:are 4247:GPL 4228:all 4006:GPL 3791:SoM 3720:Bla 3660:or 3551:DES 3413:DES 3367:Neo 2549:. 2311:DES 1923:-- 1864:CVU 1841:CVU 1817:CVU 1473:... 1447:Doc 1405:... 1389:Tom 1300:.-- 1237:or 1233:or 1176:". 1132:214 1128:213 1124:212 1120:211 1116:210 1112:209 1108:208 1104:207 1100:206 1096:205 1092:204 1088:203 1084:202 1080:201 1076:200 1072:199 1068:198 1064:197 1060:196 1056:195 1052:194 1048:193 1044:192 1040:191 1036:190 1032:189 1028:188 1024:187 1020:186 1016:185 1012:184 1008:183 1004:182 1000:181 996:180 992:179 988:178 984:177 980:176 976:175 972:174 968:173 964:172 960:171 956:170 952:169 948:168 944:167 940:166 936:165 932:164 928:163 924:162 920:161 916:160 912:159 908:158 904:157 900:156 896:155 892:154 888:153 884:152 880:151 876:150 872:149 868:148 864:147 860:146 856:145 852:144 848:143 844:142 840:141 836:140 832:139 828:138 824:137 820:136 816:135 812:134 808:133 804:132 800:131 796:130 792:129 788:128 784:127 780:126 776:125 772:124 768:123 764:122 760:121 756:120 752:119 748:118 744:117 740:116 736:115 732:114 728:113 724:112 720:111 716:110 712:109 708:108 704:107 700:106 696:105 692:104 688:103 684:102 680:101 676:100 63:WMF 10005:- 9639:- 9496:) 9491:| 9428:) 9423:| 9293:-- 9148:ᓛᖁ 9121:: 9067:- 9000:. 8884:! 8708:a 8706:is 8646:do 8522:BL 8494:] 8434:| 8422:) 8412:-- 8392:| 8388:. 8333:| 8237:, 8188:-- 8101:! 8046:) 8041:| 7951:) 7946:| 7903:) 7898:| 7801:| 7778:• 7728:\ 7540:ᓛᖁ 7343:, 7333:. 7296:-- 7251:) 7158:| 7151:) 7117:LV 6885:! 6872:| 6775:A 6762:}} 6756:{{ 6585:) 6581:| 6577:| 6459:-- 6430:CG 6413:-- 6296:A 6239:. 5733:-- 5537:) 5442:| 5438:| 5398:-- 5345:CG 5269:-- 5223:. 4951:-- 4839:) 4531:| 4412:. 4376:| 4311:| 4282:lo 4277:-- 4266:lo 4249:: 4208:• 4182:| 4149:• 4113:• 4080:• 4051:}} 4045:{{ 4027:lo 4019:. 3968:}} 3962:{{ 3914:. 3724:ck 3463:) 3386:-- 3099:, 3095:, 3047:| 3012:| 3002:) 2967:| 2963:. 2909:) 2846:) 2681:) 2583:| 2536:| 2515:Jo 2505:te 2490:) 2442:| 2420:Jo 2410:te 2381:) 2225:@ 2072:- 2054:| 2050:| 2023:RN 2019:FL 1994:-- 1921:? 1466:}} 1460:{{ 1130:, 1126:, 1122:, 1118:, 1114:, 1110:, 1106:, 1102:, 1098:, 1094:, 1090:, 1086:, 1082:, 1078:, 1074:, 1070:, 1066:, 1062:, 1058:, 1054:, 1050:, 1046:, 1042:, 1038:, 1034:, 1030:, 1026:, 1022:, 1018:, 1014:, 1010:, 1006:, 1002:, 998:, 994:, 990:, 986:, 982:, 978:, 974:, 970:, 966:, 962:, 958:, 954:, 950:, 946:, 942:, 938:, 934:, 930:, 926:, 922:, 918:, 914:, 910:, 906:, 902:, 898:, 894:, 890:, 886:, 882:, 878:, 874:, 870:, 866:, 862:, 858:, 854:, 850:, 846:, 842:, 838:, 834:, 830:, 826:, 822:, 818:, 814:, 810:, 806:, 802:, 798:, 794:, 790:, 786:, 782:, 778:, 774:, 770:, 766:, 762:, 758:, 754:, 750:, 746:, 742:, 738:, 734:, 730:, 726:, 722:, 718:, 714:, 710:, 706:, 702:, 698:, 694:, 690:, 686:, 682:, 678:, 674:, 672:99 670:, 668:98 666:, 664:97 662:, 660:96 658:, 656:95 654:, 652:94 650:, 648:93 646:, 644:92 642:, 640:91 638:, 636:90 634:, 632:89 630:, 628:88 626:, 624:87 622:, 620:86 618:, 616:85 614:, 612:84 610:, 608:83 606:, 604:82 602:, 600:81 598:, 596:80 594:, 592:79 590:, 588:78 586:, 584:77 582:, 580:76 578:, 576:75 574:, 572:74 570:, 568:73 566:, 564:72 562:, 560:71 558:, 556:70 554:, 552:69 550:, 548:68 546:, 544:67 542:, 540:66 538:, 536:65 534:, 532:64 530:, 528:63 526:, 524:62 522:, 520:61 518:, 516:60 514:, 512:59 510:, 508:58 506:, 504:57 502:, 500:56 498:, 496:55 494:, 492:54 490:, 488:53 486:, 484:52 482:, 480:51 478:, 476:50 474:, 472:49 470:, 468:48 466:, 464:47 462:, 460:46 458:, 456:45 454:, 452:44 450:, 448:43 446:, 444:42 442:, 440:41 438:, 436:40 434:, 432:39 430:, 428:38 426:, 424:37 422:, 420:36 418:, 416:35 414:, 412:34 410:, 408:33 406:, 404:32 402:, 400:31 398:, 396:30 394:, 392:29 390:, 388:28 386:, 384:27 382:, 380:26 378:, 376:25 374:, 372:24 370:, 368:23 366:, 364:22 362:, 360:21 358:, 356:20 354:, 352:19 350:, 348:18 346:, 344:17 342:, 340:16 338:, 336:15 334:, 332:14 330:, 328:13 326:, 324:12 322:, 320:11 318:, 316:10 314:, 310:, 306:, 302:, 298:, 294:, 290:, 286:, 282:, 274:AR 272:, 270:AQ 268:, 266:AP 264:, 262:AO 260:, 258:AN 256:, 254:AM 252:, 250:AL 248:, 246:AK 244:, 242:AJ 240:, 238:AI 236:, 234:AH 232:, 230:AG 228:, 226:AF 224:, 222:AE 220:, 218:AD 216:, 214:AC 212:, 210:AB 208:, 206:AA 204:, 200:, 196:, 192:, 188:, 184:, 180:, 176:, 172:, 168:, 164:, 160:, 156:, 152:, 148:, 144:, 140:, 136:, 132:, 128:, 124:, 120:, 116:, 112:, 108:, 104:, 9486:( 9418:( 9160:ᑐ 9146:‣ 9086:( 9046:( 8804:) 8800:( 8623:) 8619:( 8416:( 8036:( 7941:( 7893:( 7889:- 7774:( 7763:— 7552:ᑐ 7538:‣ 7497:6 7494:1 7491:3 7488:D 7485:W 7482:S 7312:. 7247:( 7176:S 7170:B 7057:( 6780:) 6773:( 6583:c 6579:e 6575:t 6573:( 6321:_ 6315:R 6301:) 6294:( 6181:দ 6099:দ 6027:) 6025:ᛏ 6023:( 5970:) 5835:) 5761:_ 5755:R 5645:→ 5558:) 5523:) 5516:( 5404:t 5402:• 5162:_ 5156:R 5085:e 5071:s 5052:s 5024:e 5010:s 4964:| 4854:| 4816:. 4804:. 4793:. 4741:) 4638:_ 4632:R 4617:| 4596:. 4495:Z 4485:— 4448:) 4444:( 4395:) 4391:( 4364:Z 4354:— 4212:) 4204:( 4153:) 4145:( 4117:) 4109:( 4084:) 4076:( 3922:_ 3916:R 3839:_ 3833:R 3718:| 3503:n 3499:n 3459:( 3250:) 3244:( 3240:. 3234:. 2998:( 2905:( 2842:( 2677:( 2660:_ 2654:R 2520:e 2510:r 2486:( 2425:e 2415:r 2377:( 2293:Z 2283:— 2263:| 2175:| 2155:⇒ 2086:| 2056:c 2052:t 2021:a 1859:/ 1836:/ 1812:/ 1281:) 1277:( 1243:? 1202:) 1198:( 1159:? 312:9 308:8 304:7 300:6 296:5 292:4 288:3 284:2 280:1 277:· 202:Z 198:Y 194:X 190:W 186:V 182:U 178:T 174:S 170:R 166:Q 162:P 158:O 154:N 150:M 146:L 142:K 138:J 134:I 130:H 126:G 122:F 118:E 114:D 110:C 106:B 102:A 98:· 53:) 49:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Village pump (proposals)/Archive L - Knowledge

Index