Knowledge

Absolute molar mass

Source đź“ť

229:. Batch mode measurements can also be used to determine the second virial coefficient (A2), a value that gives a measure of the likelihood of crystallization or aggregation in a given solvent. Continuous flow experiments can be used to study material eluting from virtually any source. More conventionally, the detectors are coupled to a variety of different chromatographic separation systems. The ability to determine the mass and size of the materials eluting then combines the advantage of the separation system with an absolute measurement of the mass and size of the species eluting. 170:
are better for fundamental physical reasons (molecules tend to scatter more light in lower angle directions than in higher angles), low angle scattering events caused by dust and contamination of the mobile phase easily overwhelm the scattering from the molecules of interest. When the low-angle laser light scattering (LALLS) became popular in the 1970s and mid-1980s, good quality disposable filters were not readily available and hence multi-angle measurements gained favour.
233:
time is irrelevant and the separation can be changed for different samples without recalibration. In addition, a non-size separation method such as HPLC or IC can also be used. As the light scattering detector is mass dependent, it becomes more sensitive as the molar mass increases. Thus it is an excellent tool for detecting aggregation. The higher the aggregation number, the more sensitive the detector becomes.
232:
The addition of an SLS detector coupled downstream to a chromatographic system allows the utility of SEC or similar separation combined with the advantage of an absolute detection method. The light scattering data is purely dependent on the light scattering signal times the concentration; the elution
254:
As previously noted, the MALS detector can also provide information about the size of the molecule. This information is the Root Mean Square radius of the molecule (RMS or Rg). This is different from the Rh mentioned above who is taking the hydration layer into account. The purely mathematical root
90:
could be made small enough for molecules to become temporarily lodged in their interstitial spaces. As the sample makes its way through a column the smaller molecules spend more time traveling in these void spaces than the larger ones, which have fewer places to "wander". The result is that a sample
141:
showed that taking into account the hydrodynamic volume would solve the problem. In his publication, Benoit showed that all synthetic polymers elutes on the same curve when the log of the intrinsic viscosity multiplied by the molar mass was plotted against the elution volume. This is the basis of
241:
LALS measurements are measuring at a very low angle where the scattering vector is almost zero. LALS does not need any model to fit the angular dependence and hence is giving more reliable molecular weights measurements for large molecules. LALS alone does not give any indication of the root mean
169:
Traditional light scattering instruments worked by taking readings from multiple angles, each being measured in series. A low angle light scattering system was developed in the early 1970s that allowed a single measurement to be used to calculate the molar mass. Although measurements at low angles
133:
The problem was that the system was calibrated according to the Vh characteristics of polymer standards that are not directly related to the molar mass. If the relationship between the molar mass and Vh of the standard is not the same as that of the unknown sample, then the calibration is invalid.
121:. As a consequence, the big molecules come out first, and then the small ones follow in the eluent. By choosing a suitable column packing material it is possible to define the resolution of the system. Columns can also be combined in series to increase resolution or the range of sizes studied. 250:
MALS measurements work by calculating the amount of light scattered at each angle detected. The calculation is based on the intensity of light measured and the quantum efficiency of each detector. Then a model is used to approximate the intensity of light scattered at zero angle. The zero angle
165:
need to measure the intensity of light scattered at zero angle. This is impractical as the laser source would outshine the light scattering intensity at zero angle. The 2 alternatives are to measure very close to zero angle or to measure at many angle and extrapolate using a model (Rayleigh,
129:
of time versus molar mass can be developed. This is significant for polymer analysis because a single polymer could be shown to have many different components, and the complexity and distribution of which would also affect the physical properties. However this technique has shortcomings. For
145:
For good chromatography, there must be no interaction with the column other than that produced by size. As the demands on polymer properties increased, the necessity of getting absolute information on the molar mass and size also increased. This was especially important in pharmaceutical
130:
example, unknown samples are always measured in relation to known standards, and these standards may or may not have similarities to the sample of interest. The measurements made by SEC are then mathematically converted into data similar to that found by the existing techniques.
124:
The next step is to convert the time at which the samples eluted into a measurement of molar mass. This is possible because if the molar mass of a standard were known, the time at which this standard eluted should be equal to a specific molar mass. Using multiple standards, a
142:
universal calibration which requires a viscometer to measure the intrinsic viscosity of the polymers. Universal calibration was shown to work for branched polymers, copolymers as well as starburst polymers.
221:). Batch mode experiments can be performed either by injecting a sample into a flow cell with a syringe or with the use of discrete vials. These measurements are most often used to measure timed events like 173:
Multi-angle light scattering was invented in the mid-1980s and instruments like that were able to make measurements at the different angles simultaneously but it was not until the later 1980s
134:
Thus, to be accurate, the calibration must use the same polymer, of the same conformation, in the same eluent and have the same interaction with the solvent as the hydration layer changes Vh.
36: 162: 222: 218: 119: 32: 181:(MALS) detectors to SEC systems was a practical proposition enabling both molar mass and size to be determined from each slice of the polymer fraction. 70:, and others. The problem with measurements made using membrane osmometry and sedimentation was that they only characterized the bulk properties of the 226: 210: 82:
mixture of molar masses, a method for separating the different sizes was developed. This was achieved by the advent of
178: 83: 316: 59: 255:
mean square radius is defined as the radii making up the molecule multiplied by the mass at that radius.
151: 97: 8: 155: 92: 190: 126: 209:, and encapsulated proteins. Measurements can be made in one of two modes which are 51: 264: 214: 198: 55: 50:
Another absolute instrumental approach was also possible with the development of
158:. These changes can actually have a harmful effect instead of a beneficial one. 74:
sample. Moreover, the measurements were excessively time consuming and prone to
87: 75: 35:
of molecular weights (i.e. made without reference to standards) were based on
321: 310: 300:
P.J. Wyatt, D. L. Hicks, C. Jackson and G.K. Wyatt Am. Lab. 20(6) (1988), 106
67: 44: 86:(SEC). SEC is based on the fact that the pores in the packing material of 79: 303:
C. Jackson, L.M. Nilsson and P.J. Wyatt J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 43 (1989), 99
63: 147: 245: 40: 20: 39:
and their relation to the molar mass. The most useful of these were
291:
Z. Grubisic, P. Rempp, and H. Benoit, J. Polym. Sci., 5 (1967), 753
236: 206: 202: 194: 71: 297:
P.J. Wyatt, C. Jackson and G.K. Wyatt Am. Lab 20(6) (1988), 86
166:
Rayleigh–Gans–Debye, Berry, Mie, etc.) to zero degree angle.
282:
B.H. Zimm, R.S. Stein and P. Dotty, Pol. Bull. 1,(1945), 90
294:
Flow Through MALS detector, DLS 800, Science Spectrum Inc.
288:
A.C. Ouano and W. Kaye J. Poly. Sci. A1(12) (1974), 1151
19:
is a process used to determine the characteristics of
100: 251:light scattered is then related to the molar mass. 246:Multi-angle (laser)-light scattering (MALS) method 113: 308: 237:Low-angle (laser)-light scattering (LALS) method 189:Light scattering measurements can be applied to 285:M. Fixman, J. Chem. Phys. 23 (1955), 2074 279:B.H. Zimm, J. Chem. Phys. 16 (1948), 1093 276:B.H. Zimm, J. Chem. Phys. 13 (1945), 141 270:C.V. Raman, Indian J. Phys. 2 (1927), 1 78:. In order to gain information about a 309: 273:P.Debye, J. Appl. Phys. 15 (1944), 338 146:applications where slight changes in 37:fundamental physical characteristics 154:) or shape may result in different 13: 217:mode (with SEC, HPLC or any other 179:multi-angle laser light scattering 14: 333: 258: 184: 91:is separated according to its 1: 84:size exclusion chromatography 267:, Ann. Phys. 33 (1910), 1275 163:light scattering instruments 60:Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman 7: 10: 338: 223:antibody-antigen reactions 26: 219:flow fractionation method 177:that the connection of 201:and particles such as 161:To obtain molar mass, 115: 88:chromatography columns 116: 114:{\displaystyle V_{h}} 33:absolute measurements 98: 317:Chemical properties 213:(batch mode) or in 156:biological activity 93:hydrodynamic volume 17:Absolute molar mass 191:synthetic polymers 111: 41:membrane osmometry 127:calibration curve 329: 227:protein assembly 176: 120: 118: 117: 112: 110: 109: 52:light scattering 337: 336: 332: 331: 330: 328: 327: 326: 307: 306: 261: 248: 242:square radius. 239: 215:continuous flow 211:un-fractionated 199:pharmaceuticals 187: 174: 105: 101: 99: 96: 95: 56:Albert Einstein 29: 12: 11: 5: 335: 325: 324: 319: 305: 304: 301: 298: 295: 292: 289: 286: 283: 280: 277: 274: 271: 268: 260: 257: 247: 244: 238: 235: 186: 183: 108: 104: 76:operator error 28: 25: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 334: 323: 320: 318: 315: 314: 312: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 262: 256: 252: 243: 234: 230: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 182: 180: 171: 167: 164: 159: 157: 153: 149: 143: 140: 135: 131: 128: 122: 106: 102: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68:Bruno H. Zimm 65: 61: 57: 53: 48: 46: 45:sedimentation 42: 38: 34: 24: 22: 18: 259:Bibliography 253: 249: 240: 231: 188: 185:Applications 172: 168: 160: 144: 138: 136: 132: 123: 80:polydisperse 49: 30: 16: 15: 265:A. Einstein 152:aggregation 64:Peter Debye 311:Categories 148:molar mass 54:theory by 31:The first 203:liposomes 21:molecules 207:micelles 195:proteins 175:(10-12) 137:Benoit 72:polymer 27:History 150:(e.g. 139:et al. 322:Mass 43:and 225:or 313:: 205:, 197:, 193:, 66:, 62:, 58:, 47:. 23:. 107:h 103:V

Index

molecules
absolute measurements
fundamental physical characteristics
membrane osmometry
sedimentation
light scattering
Albert Einstein
Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman
Peter Debye
Bruno H. Zimm
polymer
operator error
polydisperse
size exclusion chromatography
chromatography columns
hydrodynamic volume
calibration curve
molar mass
aggregation
biological activity
light scattering instruments
multi-angle laser light scattering
synthetic polymers
proteins
pharmaceuticals
liposomes
micelles
un-fractionated
continuous flow
flow fractionation method

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑