118:"It will have been long ago anticipated by the readers of this commentary, that I cannot consent to distort its words from their plain sense and chronological place in the prophecy, on account of any considerations of difficulty, or any risk of abuses which the doctrine of the Millennium may bring with it. Those who lived next to the Apostles, and the whole Church for three hundred years, understood them in the plain literal sense; and it is a strange sight in these days to see expositors who are among the first in reverence of antiquity, complacently casting aside the most cogent instance of unanimity which primitive antiquity presents. As regards the text itself, no legitimate treatment of it will extort what is known as the spiritual interpretation now in fashion. If, in a passage where
64:, while the second means literal rising from the grave; then there is an end of all significance in language, and Scripture is wiped out as a definite testimony to anything. If the first resurrection is spiritual, then so is the second, which I suppose none will be hardy enough to maintain. But if the second is literal, then so is the first, which in common with the whole
138:
rising from the grave—then there is an end of all significance in language, and
Scripture is wiped out as a definite testimony to anything. If the first resurrection is spiritual, then so is the second, which I suppose no one will be hardy enough to maintain. But if the second is literal, then so is
211:
George Eldon Ladd, "Historic
Premillennialism", in The Meaning of the Millennium: Four Views, ed. Robert G. Clouse (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977), pp. 37–38. Note: Ladd documents his citation as from a printing of Alford's work by Lee and Shephard, Boston, 1872, IV:732 (cp. Ladd, p.
304:
John Piper, "The Chief Design of My Life: Mortification and
Universal Holiness, Reflections on the Life and Thought of John Owen", presented January 25, 1994, at the annual Bethlehem Conference for Pastors, s.v. the "Question and Answer" session from
56:"If, in a passage where two resurrections are mentioned, where certain "souls lived" at the first, and the rest of the "dead lived" only at the end of a specified period after that first, - if in such a passage the first
330:
326:
334:
262:(Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1898, 1908, 1932), pp. 58–59. Blackstone documents this quote as from Alford's 2nd ed. (London: Rivington's, 1854), IV:726.
139:
the first, which in common with the primitive church and many of the best modern expositors, I do maintain and receive as an article of faith and hope."
158:
be used in the same sense both times. It is best simply to choose from the possible senses the one that best fits the context in each case."
181:, I go to Henry Alford. Henry Alford ... comes closer more consistently than any other commentator to asking my kinds of questions."
130:
only at the end of a specified period after the first —if in such a passage the first resurrection may be understood to mean
292:
28:(1810-1871) as a rule of biblical interpretation. It appeared in his monumental multi-volume work completed in 1861,
322:
274:, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1952), II:291. Peters also referenced Alford's statement at II:281, note 3.
349:
107:
76:
25:
68:
and many of the best modern expositors, I do maintain, and receive as an article of faith and hope."
106:, and J. Barton Payne. A lengthier citation including the statement above is found in the works of
95:
162:
102:
The brief form of the quote from Alford above may also be found in works by Alva J. McClain,
8:
111:
80:
65:
237:(Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, n.d., 4th reprint ed. 1962), pp. 461, 464.
72:
49:
45:
178:
98:. We can do no better than to repeat the oft-quoted words of Henry Alford ..."
343:
83:
75:
refers to this “law” and cites the quote above in support of his position on
143:
103:
57:
94:
suggests that both words are to be taken in the same way, referring to
222:
The
Greatness of the Kingdom: An Inductive Study of the Kingdom of God
249:(Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1980), p. 618, s.v. Prediction 32.
151:
91:
170:
44:
as follows with specific reference to the first resurrection in
174:
61:
154:
that when a word is used twice in close succession it
235:The Apocalypse: Lectures on the Book of Revelation
341:
60:may be understood to mean spiritual rising with
165:has been cited concerning Alford as follows:
224:(Winona Lake, IN: BMH Books, 1959), p. 490.
134:rising with Christ, while the second means
202:, 4 volume ed., Vol. IV, s.v. Rev. 20:5.
342:
146:cites the rule only to discredit it:
32:, which is still consulted today.
13:
293:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
289:Tyndale New Testament Commentaries
126:at the first, and the rest of the
14:
361:
312:
295:, 1988), p. 171, s.v. 1 Pet. 4:6.
247:Encyclopedia of Biblical Prophecy
150:"There is no fixed rule in any
298:
277:
265:
252:
240:
227:
215:
205:
192:
79:and the interpretation of the
1:
185:
169:"When I'm stumped with a ...
122:are mentioned, where certain
7:
10:
366:
35:
108:William Eugene Blackstone
77:Historic Premillennialism
272:The Theocratic Kingdom
40:Alford presented the
96:literal resurrection
321:(in four volumes):
319:The Greek Testament
200:The Greek Testament
112:George N. H. Peters
90:"Natural inductive
30:The Greek Testament
124:souls came to life
81:Book of Revelation
24:was formulated by
350:Biblical exegesis
287:, Vol. 17 in the
128:dead came to life
120:two resurrections
73:George Eldon Ladd
357:
306:
305:1:30:11–1:30:31.
302:
296:
281:
275:
269:
263:
256:
250:
244:
238:
231:
225:
219:
213:
209:
203:
196:
66:primitive Church
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
340:
339:
315:
310:
309:
303:
299:
291:(Grand Rapids:
282:
278:
270:
266:
260:Jesus Is Coming
257:
253:
245:
241:
232:
228:
220:
216:
210:
206:
197:
193:
188:
177:or logical in
86:. Ladd writes:
38:
12:
11:
5:
363:
353:
352:
314:
313:External links
311:
308:
307:
297:
283:Wayne Grudem,
276:
264:
251:
239:
226:
214:
212:214, note 10).
204:
198:Henry Alford,
190:
189:
187:
184:
183:
182:
160:
159:
141:
140:
100:
99:
70:
69:
37:
34:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
351:
348:
347:
345:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
301:
294:
290:
286:
280:
273:
268:
261:
255:
248:
243:
236:
233:J. A. Seiss,
230:
223:
218:
208:
201:
195:
191:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
164:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
145:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
115:
113:
109:
105:
97:
93:
89:
88:
87:
85:
82:
78:
74:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
53:
51:
47:
43:
33:
31:
27:
23:
19:
318:
316:
300:
288:
284:
279:
271:
267:
259:
254:
246:
242:
234:
229:
221:
217:
207:
199:
194:
161:
155:
144:Wayne Grudem
142:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
104:Joseph Seiss
101:
71:
58:resurrection
41:
39:
29:
26:Henry Alford
21:
17:
15:
175:syntactical
171:grammatical
258:W. E. B.,
186:References
163:John Piper
84:chapter 20
132:spiritual
46:Rev. 20:4
344:Category
335:Volume 4
331:Volume 3
327:Volume 2
323:Volume 1
317:Alford,
152:language
92:exegesis
285:1 Peter
136:literal
36:Content
110:, and
62:Christ
16:This
179:Paul
156:must
42:rule
22:Rule
173:or
20:or
18:Law
346::
337:.
333:,
329:,
325:,
114::
52::
50:6
48:–
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.