244:". Artists and consumers both asked for further consultation on the bill, stating that it infringes on the right of private citizens to transfer something they own to another medium, and that the prohibition against circumventing corporate software designed to lock users out would hamper research. After interviewing several copyright lawyers on Bill C-32, The Financial Post concluded that "ultimately, most lawyers suggest that the fair dealing definitions and exceptions should be broadened and consumers should have the right to break digital locks for personal use."
223:
Bill C-32 sought to subject
Internet Service Providers to a "notice and notice" obligation. Such a scheme requires accusations of copyright infringement to be forwarded to the subscribers being accused and information about them kept for a period of time. The bill proposed to limit statutory damages
219:
exception" permitting compilations of copyrighted works as long as they had no digital locks. Under the bill libraries lending materials electronically would have been required to make those copies self-destruct within five days. Schools offering online course materials would have been obligated to
267:
Heritage
Minister James Moore drew particular criticism when on June 22, 2010, he warned conference attendees about "radical extremists" who "oppose copyright reform" and suggested that they be confronted on social media. The speech was originally set to contain an admission that Bill C-61 was too
202:
software locks. These restrictions were described as "arguably worse than those found in the U.S." While explicit mentions of "videocassettes" in Bill C-61 were replaced with technology neutral terms, the copying of DRM encumbered media such as DVDs was still prohibited by Bill C-32. Bill C-32 was
263:
criticized Bill C-32 for not doing enough to compensate artists and the Quebec Bar
Association opposed the bill on the grounds that it would create an unnecessary amount of litigation. A protest was held in Calgary on June 27, 2010 citing environmental reasons as well. Some groups such as the
781:
163:
in 2008 and sought to tighten
Canadian copyright laws. In March 2011, the 40th Canadian Parliament was dissolved, with all the bills which did not pass by that point (including bill C-32) automatically becoming dead.
214:
Bill C-32 called for a mandatory review of copyright law every five years. Two clauses it introduced that had not been seen in previous
Canadian legislation were an exception that allowed unlocking cell phones and a
756:
785:
662:
264:
Canadian
Library Association and the Business Coalition for Balanced Copyright generally supported the bill but took issue with DRM circumvention being illegal for personal use.
220:
render those materials inaccessible thirty days after the course's end date. Performers and photographers were set to receive greater control over reproductions of their works.
314:
224:
to $ 5,000 in the case of non-commercial infringement, compared to the previous fine of $ 20,000 that did not distinguish between commercial and non-commercial.
179:". After Bill C-32's introduction, James Moore responded to criticism by calling the bill's detractors "radical extremists". In the aftermath of the bill, the
903:
714:
688:
760:
478:
288:
283:
160:
383:
207:, the bill would have even criminalized "websites designed to encourage violation and piracy". When describing the main principle of the bill,
211:
said "anytime a digital lock is used - whether on books, movies, music, or electronic devices - the lock trumps virtually all other rights."
268:
restrictive in its protections of digital locks. The specific party vilified in Moore's speech was widely considered to be
Michael Geist.
666:
875:
898:
334:
400:
520:
453:
807:
546:
923:
355:
255:
stated that "the only rights you will get under this bill are those that U.S.-based entertainment concerns decide you get."
572:
180:
236:
who called it "flawed but fixable". Since many rights granted by Bill C-32 were nullified by the digital lock protection,
277:
641:
198:
The bill would have criminalized the act of circumventing, or making available to the public the ability to circumvent,
175:
commented that the bill was introduced by an "out-of-touch Moore, who has emerged as a staunch advocate for a
Canadian
918:
335:"Government Bill (House of Commons) C-32 (40-3) - First Reading - Copyright Modernization Act - Parliament of Canada"
260:
247:
Among groups who opposed Bill C-32 were the
Canadian Consumer Initiative and the Documentary Organization of Canada.
156:
98:
933:
308:
854:
616:
928:
252:
482:
938:
692:
782:"The Business Coalition for Balanced Copyright welcomes the introduction of the Copyright Modernization Act"
115:
735:
105:
293:
187:
594:
430:
167:
Many restrictions in the bill were harshly criticized, especially those regarding the circumvention of
68:
26:
380:
199:
168:
148:
904:
Legislative
Committee on Bill C-32 (CC32) - list of committee meetings with recordings and minutes
232:
Many Canadians criticized the bill's attempts to follow American-style copyright law, including
298:
183:
revealed ongoing pressure from US officials wanting Canada to pass stricter copyright laws.
8:
80:
404:
479:"Harper Government Delivers on Commitment to Reintroduce Copyright Modernization Act"
833:
811:
550:
524:
457:
387:
241:
140:
757:"Canadian Library Association Gives Passing Grade to New Copyright Legislation"
159:. This bill served as the successor to the previously proposed but short-lived
147:, Bill C-32) was a bill tabled on June 2, 2010 during the third session of the
203:
also interpreted as banning the user of region-free DVD players. According to
912:
248:
233:
208:
172:
152:
94:
37:
547:"Seven Copyright Questions for Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore"
454:"Wikileaks Cables Show Massive U.S. Effort To Establish Canadian DMCA"
401:"National Post Reports "Heavy Handed" Copyright Law Coming Next Week"
808:"Canadians told us the TPM provisions in C-61 were too far reaching"
204:
597:. Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. 2010-06-07
216:
303:
237:
315:
Protection of Broadcasts and Broadcasting Organizations Treaty
256:
176:
715:"Ottawa pushes ahead with copyright bill amid opposition"
876:""Radical extremists" and the smearing of Michael Geist"
481:. Balanced Copyright. September 29, 2011. Archived from
663:"New Copyright Bill Hinders Documentary Filmmaking"
899:Parliament Canada - Bill C-32 - Complete Bill Text
665:. Mediacaster Magazine. 2010-06-03. Archived from
573:"Copyright bill would ban breaking digital locks"
521:"The Canadian Copyright Bill: Flawed But Fixable"
294:Bill C-11 (41st Canadian Parliament, 1st Session)
289:Bill C-61 (39th Canadian Parliament, 2nd Session)
284:Bill C-60 (38th Canadian Parliament, 1st Session)
910:
186:The bill was revived in the next Parliament as
689:"Bill C-32: A Lifeline for a Dying Industry"
642:"Consumer groups blast Moore over copyright"
145:Loi modifiant la Loi sur le droit d’auteur
834:"James Moore's Attack on Fair Copyright"
425:
423:
421:
873:
852:
736:"Rally opposing copyright infringement"
686:
635:
633:
614:
350:
348:
911:
712:
831:
805:
639:
570:
544:
518:
514:
512:
510:
508:
506:
504:
502:
500:
451:
418:
398:
375:
373:
155:and by Minister of Canadian Heritage
630:
345:
181:United States diplomatic cables leak
617:"Pending copyright law needs a fix"
278:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
240:referred to the bill as "a case of
13:
615:Carlson, Daryl-Lynn (2011-03-10).
497:
370:
14:
950:
892:
855:"Minister Moore's Speech on C-32"
784:. CNW. 2010-06-03. Archived from
759:. CNW. 2010-06-03. Archived from
379:Reynolds, Graham. The Mark News,
261:Canadian Music Creators Coalition
136:An Act to amend the Copyright Act
47:An Act to amend the Copyright Act
309:Digital Millennium Copyright Act
867:
846:
825:
799:
774:
749:
728:
706:
680:
655:
608:
595:"Grassroots Advocacy: Fix C-32"
587:
564:
874:Haggart, Blayne (2010-06-23).
687:Karrass, Robert (2011-03-02).
538:
471:
445:
392:
327:
1:
853:Sookman, Barry (2010-06-23).
832:Geist, Michael (2010-06-23).
806:Geist, Michael (2010-12-08).
571:Nowak, Peter (June 3, 2010).
545:Geist, Michael (2010-05-25).
519:Geist, Michael (2010-06-02).
452:Geist, Michael (2011-04-29).
431:"Copyright debate turns ugly"
399:Geist, Michael (2010-05-19).
320:
924:Canadian federal legislation
691:. IP Osgoode. Archived from
7:
713:Taylor, Kate (2010-11-01).
640:Nowak, Peter (2010-06-16).
271:
227:
10:
955:
386:February 16, 2011, at the
381:How balanced is Bill C-32?
193:
69:House of Commons of Canada
27:House of Commons of Canada
433:. CBC News. June 24, 2010
200:digital rights management
124:
114:
104:
90:
79:
74:
64:
56:
32:
25:
20:
919:40th Canadian Parliament
356:"Bill C-32 at LegisInfo"
151:by Minister of Industry
149:40th Canadian Parliament
934:Proposed laws of Canada
190:on September 29, 2011.
929:Canadian copyright law
738:. CTV News. 2010-06-27
358:. Parliament of Canada
299:Canadian Copyright Act
144:
939:2010 in Canadian law
814:on December 11, 2010
717:. The Globe and Mail
619:. The Financial Post
485:on January 27, 2012
75:Legislative history
460:on April 30, 2011
407:on March 23, 2011
132:
131:
946:
886:
885:
883:
882:
871:
865:
864:
862:
861:
850:
844:
843:
841:
840:
829:
823:
822:
820:
819:
810:. Archived from
803:
797:
796:
794:
793:
778:
772:
771:
769:
768:
753:
747:
746:
744:
743:
732:
726:
725:
723:
722:
710:
704:
703:
701:
700:
684:
678:
677:
675:
674:
659:
653:
652:
650:
649:
637:
628:
627:
625:
624:
612:
606:
605:
603:
602:
591:
585:
584:
582:
580:
568:
562:
561:
559:
558:
549:. Archived from
542:
536:
535:
533:
532:
523:. Archived from
516:
495:
494:
492:
490:
475:
469:
468:
466:
465:
456:. Archived from
449:
443:
442:
440:
438:
427:
416:
415:
413:
412:
403:. Archived from
396:
390:
377:
368:
367:
365:
363:
352:
343:
342:
331:
171:. Law professor
120:November 5, 2010
18:
17:
954:
953:
949:
948:
947:
945:
944:
943:
909:
908:
895:
890:
889:
880:
878:
872:
868:
859:
857:
851:
847:
838:
836:
830:
826:
817:
815:
804:
800:
791:
789:
780:
779:
775:
766:
764:
755:
754:
750:
741:
739:
734:
733:
729:
720:
718:
711:
707:
698:
696:
685:
681:
672:
670:
661:
660:
656:
647:
645:
638:
631:
622:
620:
613:
609:
600:
598:
593:
592:
588:
578:
576:
569:
565:
556:
554:
553:on May 28, 2010
543:
539:
530:
528:
517:
498:
488:
486:
477:
476:
472:
463:
461:
450:
446:
436:
434:
429:
428:
419:
410:
408:
397:
393:
388:Wayback Machine
378:
371:
361:
359:
354:
353:
346:
333:
332:
328:
323:
274:
242:Jekyll and Hyde
230:
196:
65:Enacted by
52:
49:
42:
41:
12:
11:
5:
952:
942:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
907:
906:
901:
894:
893:External links
891:
888:
887:
866:
845:
824:
798:
773:
748:
727:
705:
679:
654:
629:
607:
586:
563:
537:
496:
470:
444:
417:
391:
369:
344:
339:www.parl.gc.ca
325:
324:
322:
319:
318:
317:
312:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
273:
270:
229:
226:
195:
192:
130:
129:
122:
121:
118:
116:Second reading
112:
111:
108:
102:
101:
92:
88:
87:
84:
77:
76:
72:
71:
66:
62:
61:
58:
54:
53:
51:
50:
45:
35:
34:
33:
30:
29:
23:
22:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
951:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
916:
914:
905:
902:
900:
897:
896:
877:
870:
856:
849:
835:
828:
813:
809:
802:
788:on 2014-05-24
787:
783:
777:
763:on 2014-05-24
762:
758:
752:
737:
731:
716:
709:
695:on 2014-05-24
694:
690:
683:
669:on 2014-05-24
668:
664:
658:
643:
636:
634:
618:
611:
596:
590:
574:
567:
552:
548:
541:
527:on 2010-06-05
526:
522:
515:
513:
511:
509:
507:
505:
503:
501:
484:
480:
474:
459:
455:
448:
432:
426:
424:
422:
406:
402:
395:
389:
385:
382:
376:
374:
357:
351:
349:
340:
336:
330:
326:
316:
313:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
269:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:Charlie Angus
245:
243:
239:
235:
234:Michael Geist
225:
221:
218:
212:
210:
209:Michael Geist
206:
201:
191:
189:
184:
182:
178:
174:
173:Michael Geist
170:
169:digital locks
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
127:
123:
119:
117:
113:
109:
107:
106:First reading
103:
100:
96:
93:
91:Introduced by
89:
85:
82:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
55:
48:
44:
43:
40:
39:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
879:. Retrieved
869:
858:. Retrieved
848:
837:. Retrieved
827:
816:. Retrieved
812:the original
801:
790:. Retrieved
786:the original
776:
765:. Retrieved
761:the original
751:
740:. Retrieved
730:
719:. Retrieved
708:
697:. Retrieved
693:the original
682:
671:. Retrieved
667:the original
657:
646:. Retrieved
621:. Retrieved
610:
599:. Retrieved
589:
577:. Retrieved
566:
555:. Retrieved
551:the original
540:
529:. Retrieved
525:the original
487:. Retrieved
483:the original
473:
462:. Retrieved
458:the original
447:
435:. Retrieved
409:. Retrieved
405:the original
394:
360:. Retrieved
338:
329:
266:
246:
231:
222:
213:
197:
185:
166:
153:Tony Clement
135:
134:
133:
125:
110:June 2, 2010
95:Tony Clement
46:
36:
15:
579:January 23,
489:January 23,
437:January 23,
362:January 23,
157:James Moore
99:James Moore
913:Categories
881:2014-05-22
860:2014-05-22
839:2014-05-22
818:2014-05-22
792:2014-05-22
767:2014-05-22
742:2014-05-22
721:2014-05-22
699:2014-05-22
673:2014-05-22
648:2014-05-22
644:. CBC News
623:2014-05-22
601:2014-05-22
575:. CBC News
557:2014-05-23
531:2014-05-22
464:2014-05-22
411:2014-05-22
321:References
38:Long title
161:Bill C-61
86:Bill C-32
60:Bill C-32
21:Bill C-32
384:Archived
272:See also
259:and the
228:Reaction
205:CBC News
57:Citation
251:of the
217:YouTube
194:Content
128:Expired
126:Status:
311:(DMCA)
304:DADVSI
280:(ACTA)
238:CIPPIC
141:French
257:SOCAN
83:title
581:2012
491:2012
439:2012
364:2012
188:C-11
177:DMCA
97:and
81:Bill
253:NDP
915::
632:^
499:^
420:^
372:^
347:^
337:.
143::
884:.
863:.
842:.
821:.
795:.
770:.
745:.
724:.
702:.
676:.
651:.
626:.
604:.
583:.
560:.
534:.
493:.
467:.
441:.
414:.
366:.
341:.
215:"
139:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.