138:, which is the first handwritten manuscript by an author. The archetype is also commonly mistaken to be the original text, although many would argue that it is impossible to locate an original text within a tradition where there may not be surviving evidence, and because the author and editors may have constructed several drafts and editions throughout the process, from the moment of birth of the author's idea until the publication of an edition of the work. On the other hand, an archetype could be the original, in the sense that it is not a copy, but the concrete surviving, unmodified text.
223:
22:
130:
approach, the textual critic tries to trace the oldest surviving manuscript and show the relationship it has to its ancestors. This makes it possible to compare changes made in different traditions branching off from the archetype, and develop an edition that reconstructs the text of the archetype as
264:
39:
86:
195:
58:
65:
72:
257:
54:
105:
250:
43:
147:
79:
283:
238:
152:
293:
288:
170:
Epp, Eldon Jay. "The
Multivalence of the Term 'Original Text' in New Testament Textual Criticism."
32:
8:
175:
230:
119:
203:
234:
277:
207:
179:
127:
135:
196:
The genealogy of texts: Manuscript traditions and textual traditions
21:
222:
126:
is a text that originates a textual tradition. By using a
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
275:
258:
134:An archetype should not be confused with the
265:
251:
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
276:
200:Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
174:, vol. 92, no. 3, 1999, pp. 245–281.
217:
44:adding citations to reliable sources
15:
13:
188:
55:"Archetype" textual criticism
14:
305:
221:
20:
31:needs additional citations for
172:The Harvard Theological Review
164:
1:
158:
237:. You can help Knowledge by
148:Exemplar (textual criticism)
7:
141:
10:
310:
216:
202:(2016) 31 (3): 563–577.
233:-related article is a
194:Bordalejo, Barbara: "
131:closely as possible.
40:improve this article
208:10.1093/llc/fqv038
284:Textual criticism
246:
245:
231:textual criticism
120:textual criticism
116:
115:
108:
90:
301:
267:
260:
253:
225:
218:
183:
168:
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
309:
308:
304:
303:
302:
300:
299:
298:
294:Philology stubs
289:Criticism stubs
274:
273:
272:
271:
214:
191:
189:Further reading
186:
169:
165:
161:
144:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
307:
297:
296:
291:
286:
270:
269:
262:
255:
247:
244:
243:
226:
212:
211:
190:
187:
185:
184:
162:
160:
157:
156:
155:
150:
143:
140:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
306:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
281:
279:
268:
263:
261:
256:
254:
249:
248:
242:
240:
236:
232:
227:
224:
220:
219:
215:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
181:
177:
173:
167:
163:
154:
151:
149:
146:
145:
139:
137:
132:
129:
125:
121:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
239:expanding it
228:
213:
199:
171:
166:
133:
123:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
96:August 2017
278:Categories
159:References
66:newspapers
136:autograph
128:stemmatic
124:archetype
142:See also
180:1510127
80:scholar
178:
153:Urtext
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
229:This
176:JSTOR
122:, an
87:JSTOR
73:books
235:stub
59:news
204:doi
198:."
118:In
42:by
280::
266:e
259:t
252:v
241:.
210:.
206::
182:.
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
