Knowledge

Authority distribution

Source 📝

433:
regression approaches, and spatial, network, or multidimensional analyses to sort complicated objects, ignoring the variety and variability of the objects. By recognizing the diversity and heterogeneity among both the observations and the consumers, Hu (2000) instead applies endogenous weighting to these contradictory revealed preferences. The outcome is a consistent steady-state solution to the counterbalance equilibrium within these contradictions. The solution takes into consideration the spillover effects of multiple-step interactions among the observations. When information from data is efficiently revealed in preferences, the revealed preferences greatly reduce the volume of the required data in the sorting process.
413:
assumption by dividing long freeways into smaller segments and rename them all. The freeways with higher traffic intensity should be built with more driving lanes and so receive more investments. Of all the traffic flow on Fi, we let P(i,j) be the (estimated) proportion of the traffic flowing into Fj. Then the authority distribution π satisfying π = πP will measure the relative traffic intensity on each Fi and can be used in the investment allocation.
118: 220: 22: 63: 391:
multiple offers. An applicant with multiple offers will decide which college to go to and reject all other colleges which make offers to him. Of all applicants who apply to and receive offers from College i, we let P(i,j) be the proportion of those applicants who decide to go to college j. Such applicants of course apply to and receive offers from College j as well.
404:
P(i,j) be the proportion of those papers which are published on Journal j. So P measures the direct impact between any two journals and P(i, i) is the self-citation rate for Journal i . The authority distribution for π = πP would quantify the long-term influence of each journal in the group of journals and can be used to rank these journals.
412:
A few small towns believe that building a freeway system would be to their common benefit. Say, they plan to build freeways F1, F2, ..., Fn−1. We let Fn be the existing traffic channels of car, truck and bus. We assume that all the potential freeways have the same length. Otherwise we can make up the
394:
To rank the colleges by the acceptance rates of the applicants to whom offers were made, we can apply the authority distribution associated with the matrix P. The so-called “authority distribution” can be regarded as the measure of relative attractiveness of the colleges from the applicants’ point of
403:
Assume there are n journals in a scientific field. For any Journal i, each issue contains many papers, and each paper has its list of references or citations. A paper in journal j can be cited in another paper in Journal i as a reference. Of all papers cited by Journal i (repetition counted), we let
373:
The authority distribution π is defined as the solution to the counterbalance equation π=πΡ. The basic idea for the counterbalance equation is that a person's power comes from his critical roles in others' command game; on the other hand, his power could also be redistributed to those who sit in his
390:
Suppose that there are large numbers of college applicants to apply the colleges Each applicant files multiple applications. Each college then offers some of its applicants admissions and rejects all others. Now some applicants may get no offer from any college; the other then get one offer or
432:
When ranking big data observations, diverse consumers reveal heterogeneous preferences; but any revealed preference is a ranking between two observations, derived from a consumer’s rational consideration of many factors. Previous researchers have applied exogenous weighting and multivariate
424:
Assume there are n countries. Let P(i,j) be country j's weights of consumption of country's total production. The associated π measures the weights in the trading system of n countries.
366:
The organization contracts each individual by boss and approval relation with others. So each individual has its own authority structure, called command game. The
139: 132: 81: 643: 244:
of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be
296: 182: 354:
and his student X. Hu in 2003 to measure the authority power of players in a well-contracted organization. The index generates the
268: 154: 35: 275: 161: 631: 282: 168: 333: 315: 201: 99: 49: 264: 150: 377:
For a simple legislative body, π is simply the Shapley-Shubik power index, based on a probabilistic argument ().
533:
Shapley, L. S.; Shubik, M. (1954). "A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System".
241: 41: 681: 676: 447: 367: 355: 237: 253: 289: 175: 652:
Calculate your project potential returns on your mutual fund investments across various timeframes
128: 77: 646:
Computes various indices for (multiple) weighted voting games online. Includes some examples.
671: 230: 8: 452: 599: 568: 560: 515: 249: 484: 572: 245: 519: 609: 550: 542: 507: 480: 471:
Hu, Xingwei; Shapley, Lloyd (2003). "On Authority Distributions in Organizations".
614: 587: 555: 511: 370:
for these command games are collectively denoted by a power transit matrix Ρ.
665: 588:"Sorting big data by revealed preference with application to college ranking" 442: 351: 416:
A similar issue can be found in designing an Internet or Intranet system.
564: 655: 546: 117: 637: 604: 72:
provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject
236:
Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing
498:
Hu, Xingwei (2006). "An Asymmetric Shapley–Shubik Power Index".
358:
and can be used in ranking, planning and organizational choice.
649: 428:
Example 5. Sort Big Data Objects by Revealed Preference
386:
Example 1. College ranking by applicants’ acceptance
663: 658:Calculate your attractiveness with pretty scale. 420:Example 4. Real Effective Exchange Rates Weights 640:Web-based algorithms for voting power analysis 638:Computer Algorithms for Voting Power Analysis 532: 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 613: 603: 554: 470: 334:Learn how and when to remove this message 316:Learn how and when to remove this message 202:Learn how and when to remove this message 100:Learn how and when to remove this message 399:Example 2. Journal rankings by citations 408:Example 3. Planning of a freeway system 664: 138:Please improve this article by adding 650:Systematic investment plan calculator 82:providing more context for the reader 500:International Journal of Game Theory 213: 111: 56: 15: 13: 585: 497: 14: 693: 625: 535:American Political Science Review 31:This article has multiple issues. 218: 116: 61: 20: 380: 374:command game as vital players. 39:or discuss these issues on the 579: 526: 491: 464: 1: 632:Online Power Index Calculator 485:10.1016/s0899-8256(03)00130-1 458: 361: 140:secondary or tertiary sources 231:general notability guideline 7: 473:Games and Economic Behavior 436: 10: 698: 615:10.1186/s40537-020-00300-1 448:Shapley-Shubik power index 368:Shapley-Shubik power index 356:Shapley-Shubik power index 238:reliable secondary sources 227:The topic of this article 512:10.1007/s00182-006-0011-z 229:may not meet Knowledge's 265:"Authority distribution" 151:"Authority distribution" 644:Power Index Calculator 348:authority distribution 127:relies excessively on 346:The solution concept 586:Hu, Xingwei (2020). 592:Journal of Big Data 453:Banzhaf power index 78:improve the article 634:(by Tomomi Matsui) 556:10338.dmlcz/143361 350:was formulated by 233: 682:Electoral systems 677:Cooperative games 344: 343: 336: 326: 325: 318: 300: 228: 212: 211: 204: 186: 110: 109: 102: 54: 689: 620: 619: 617: 607: 583: 577: 576: 558: 530: 524: 523: 495: 489: 488: 468: 339: 332: 321: 314: 310: 307: 301: 299: 258: 222: 221: 214: 207: 200: 196: 193: 187: 185: 144: 120: 112: 105: 98: 94: 91: 85: 65: 64: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 697: 696: 692: 691: 690: 688: 687: 686: 662: 661: 628: 623: 584: 580: 547:10.2307/1951053 531: 527: 496: 492: 469: 465: 461: 439: 383: 364: 340: 329: 328: 327: 322: 311: 305: 302: 259: 257: 235: 223: 219: 208: 197: 191: 188: 145: 143: 137: 133:primary sources 121: 106: 95: 89: 86: 75: 66: 62: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 695: 685: 684: 679: 674: 660: 659: 653: 647: 641: 635: 627: 626:External links 624: 622: 621: 578: 541:(3): 787–792. 525: 506:(2): 229–240. 490: 462: 460: 457: 456: 455: 450: 445: 438: 435: 382: 379: 363: 360: 342: 341: 324: 323: 226: 224: 217: 210: 209: 124: 122: 115: 108: 107: 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 694: 683: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 669: 667: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 629: 616: 611: 606: 601: 597: 593: 589: 582: 574: 570: 566: 562: 557: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 529: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 494: 486: 482: 478: 474: 467: 463: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 443:Shapley value 441: 440: 434: 430: 429: 425: 422: 421: 417: 414: 410: 409: 405: 401: 400: 396: 392: 388: 387: 378: 375: 371: 369: 359: 357: 353: 352:Lloyd Shapley 349: 338: 335: 320: 317: 309: 298: 295: 291: 288: 284: 281: 277: 274: 270: 267: –  266: 262: 261:Find sources: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 232: 225: 216: 215: 206: 203: 195: 184: 181: 177: 174: 170: 167: 163: 160: 156: 153: –  152: 148: 147:Find sources: 141: 135: 134: 130: 125:This article 123: 119: 114: 113: 104: 101: 93: 83: 79: 73: 70:This article 68: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 656:Pretty Scale 595: 591: 581: 538: 534: 528: 503: 499: 493: 476: 472: 466: 431: 427: 426: 423: 419: 418: 415: 411: 407: 406: 402: 398: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 381:Applications 376: 372: 365: 347: 345: 330: 312: 303: 293: 286: 279: 272: 260: 198: 189: 179: 172: 165: 158: 146: 126: 96: 87: 76:Please help 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 672:Game theory 479:: 132–170. 242:independent 666:Categories 605:2003.12198 459:References 362:Definition 276:newspapers 250:redirected 162:newspapers 129:references 36:improve it 573:143514359 306:June 2016 240:that are 192:June 2016 90:June 2016 42:talk page 520:42120182 437:See also 565:1951053 290:scholar 254:deleted 176:scholar 571:  563:  518:  395:view. 292:  285:  278:  271:  263:  246:merged 178:  171:  164:  157:  149:  600:arXiv 569:S2CID 561:JSTOR 516:S2CID 297:JSTOR 283:books 252:, or 183:JSTOR 169:books 269:news 155:news 610:doi 551:hdl 543:doi 508:doi 481:doi 131:to 80:by 668:: 608:. 598:. 594:. 590:. 567:. 559:. 549:. 539:48 537:. 514:. 504:34 502:. 477:45 475:. 248:, 142:. 45:. 618:. 612:: 602:: 596:7 575:. 553:: 545:: 522:. 510:: 487:. 483:: 337:) 331:( 319:) 313:( 308:) 304:( 294:· 287:· 280:· 273:· 256:. 234:. 205:) 199:( 194:) 190:( 180:· 173:· 166:· 159:· 136:. 103:) 97:( 92:) 88:( 84:. 74:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
improve the article
providing more context for the reader
Learn how and when to remove this message

references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Authority distribution"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
general notability guideline
reliable secondary sources
independent
merged
redirected
deleted
"Authority distribution"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.