Knowledge

Cell disruption

Source đź“ť

350:, due to their ability to maintain constant pressure throughout the piston stroke. As the French Press, which is operated by hydraulic pressure, is capable of over 90% lysis of most commonly used cell types it is often taken as the gold standard in lysis performance and modern machines are often compared against it not only in terms of lysis efficiency but also in terms of safety and ease of use. Some manufacturers are also trying to improve on the traditional design by altering properties within these machines other than the pressure driving the sample through the orifice. One such example is Constant Systems, who have recently shown that their Cell Disruptors not only match the performance of a traditional French Press, but also that they are striving towards attaining the same results at a much lower power. 354:
rupture (lysis) of cells and tissues from human, animal, plant, and microbial sources, and the inactivation of pathogens. PCT-enhanced systems (instruments and consumables) address some challenging problems inherent in biological sample preparation. PCT advantages include: (a) extraction and recovery of more membrane proteins, (b) enhanced protein digestion, (c) differential lysis in a mixed sample base, (d) pathogen inactivation, (e) increased DNA detection, and (f) exquisite sample preparation process control.
130: 342:, or French Press for short. This method was developed by Charles Stacy French and utilises high pressure to force cells through a narrow orifice, causing the cells to lyse due to the shear forces experienced across the pressure differential. While French Presses have become a staple item in many microbiology laboratories, their production has been largely discontinued, leading to a resurgence in alternate applications of similar technology. 33: 326:
biological samples containing a significant fraction of water become brittle at extremely cold temperatures. This technique was first described by Smucker and Pfister in 1975, who referred to the technique as cryo-impacting. The authors demonstrated cells are effectively broken by this method, confirming by phase and electron microscopy that breakage planes cross cell walls and cytoplasmic membranes.
330:
require less manual effort, give good sample recovery and are easy to clean between samples. Advantages of this technique are higher yields of proteins and nucleic acids from small, hard tissue samples - especially when used as a preliminary step to mechanical or chemical/solvent cell disruption methods mentioned above.
353:
Pressure Cycling Technology ("PCT"). PCT is a patented, enabling technology platform that uses alternating cycles of hydrostatic pressure between ambient and ultra-high levels (up to 90,000 psi) to safely, conveniently and reproducibly control the actions of molecules in biological samples, e.g., the
345:
Modern physical cell disruptors typically operate via either pneumatic or hydraulic pressure. Although pneumatic machines are typically lower cost, their performance can be unreliable due to variations in the processing pressure throughout the stroke of the air pump. It is generally considered that
361:
cell suspension, such as particle size, viscosity, protein yield and enzyme activity. In recent years the Microfluidizer method has gained popularity in cell disruption due to its ease of use and efficiency at disrupting many different kinds of cells. The Microfluidizer technology was licensed from
277:
All high energy bead beating machines warm the sample about 10 degrees per minute. This is due to frictional collisions of the beads during homogenization. Cooling of the sample during or after bead beating may be necessary to prevent damage to heat-sensitive proteins such as enzymes. Sample warming
329:
The technique can be done by using a mortar and pestle cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures, but use of this classic apparatus is laborious and sample loss is often a concern. Specialised stainless steel pulverizers generically known as Tissue Pulverizers are also available for this purpose. They
250:
Successful bead beating is dependent not only on design features of the shaking machine (which take into consideration shaking oscillations frequency, shaking throw or distance, shaking orientation and vial orientation), but also the selection of correct bead size (0.1–6 mm (0.004–0.2 in)
325:
Samples with a tough extracellular matrix, such as animal connective tissue, some tumor biopsy samples, venous tissue, cartilage, seeds, etc., are reduced to a fine powder by impact pulverization at liquid nitrogen temperatures. This technique, known as cryopulverization, is based on the fact that
472:
the sample or produce unwanted damage. There is no need to watch for a peak between enzyme activity and percent disruption. Since nitrogen bubbles are generated within each cell, the same disruptive force is applied uniformly throughout the sample, thus ensuring unusual uniformity in the product.
393:
Viscosity changes are also often observed when disrupting cells. If the cell suspension viscosity is high, it can make downstream handling—such as filtration and accurate pipetting—quite difficult. The viscosity changes observed with a Microfluidizer are relatively low, and decreases with further
397:
In contrast to other mechanical disruption methods the Microfluidizer breaks the cell membranes efficiently but gently, resulting in relatively large cell wall fragments (450 nm), and thus making it easier to separate the cell contents. This can lead to shorter filtration times and better
384:
Many proteins are extremely temperature-sensitive, and in many cases can start to denature at temperatures of only 4 degrees Celsius. Within the microchannels, temperatures exceed 4 degrees Celsius, but the machine is designed to cool quickly so that the time the cells are exposed to elevated
232:, and can yield breakage of well over 50% (up to 95%). It has the advantage over other mechanical cell disruption methods of being able to disrupt very small sample sizes, process many samples at a time with no cross-contamination concerns, and does not release potentially harmful 300:
rotor inside a 15, 50 or 200 ml chamber to agitate the beads. In this configuration, the chamber can be surrounded by a static cooling jacket. Using this same rotor/chamber configuration, large commercial machines are available to process many liters of
456:
is preferred because of its non-reactive nature and because it does not alter the pH of the suspending medium. In addition, nitrogen is preferred because it is generally available at low cost and at pressures suitable for this procedure.
164:
methods allows the study and manufacture of relevant molecules. Except for excreted molecules, cells producing molecules of interest must be disrupted. This page discusses various methods. Another method of disruption is called
650:
The photochemical reduction process in photosynthesis. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. C. S. French, H. W. Milner. V. Carbon Dioxide Fixation and Photosynthesis. 232-250. Cambridge University Press, New
428:
and mechanical homogenizing methods and compares favorably to the controlled disruptive action obtained in a PTFE and glass mortar and pestle homogenizer. While other disruptive methods depend upon friction or a mechanical
197:. First developed by Tim Hopkins in the late 1970s, the sample and bead mix is subjected to high level agitation by stirring or shaking. Beads collide with the cellular sample, cracking open the cell to release the 714:
agerkvist, Irene, and Sven-Olof Enfors.”Characterization Of E. Coli Cell Disintegrates from a Bead Bill and High Pressure Homogenizer.”Biotechnology and bioengineering Biotechnol.Bioeng.36.11 (1990):1083-089.Web.
705:
agerkvist, Irene, and Sven-Olof Enfors.”Characterization Of E. Coli Cell Disintegrates from a Bead Bill and High Pressure Homogenizer.”Biotechnology and bioengineering Biotechnol.Bioeng.36.11 (1990):1083-089.Web.
413:. Then, when the gas pressure is suddenly released, the nitrogen comes out of the solution as expanding bubbles that stretch the membranes of each cell until they rupture and release the contents of the cell. 389:
25 ms-40 ms). Because of this effective temperature control, the Microfluidizer yields higher levels of active proteins and enzymes than other mechanical methods when the proteins are temperature-sensitive.
239:
In the simplest example of the method, an equal volume of beads are added to a cell or tissue suspension in a test tube and the sample is vigorously mixed on a common laboratory
274:
also shorten process times, as do Bead Dispensers designed to quickly load beads into multiple vials or microplates. Pre-loaded vials and microplates are also available.
270:. Differing from conventional machines, it agitates the beads using a vortex motion at 20,000 oscillations per minute. Larger bead beater machines that hold deep-well 641:
The photochemical activity of isolated chloroplasts. C. S. French, H. W. Milner, M. L. Koenig, and F. D. H. Macdowall. Carn. Inst. Wash. Yearb. 1948; 47:91-93
632:
Liquid Nitrogen Cryo-Impacting: a New Concept for Cell Disruption. Richard A. Smucker, Robert M. Pfister. Appl Microbiol. 1975 September; 30(3): 445–449.
266:. Cell disruption is complete in 1–3 minutes of shaking. Significantly faster rates of cell disruption are achieved with a bead beater variation called 433:
action that generate heat, the nitrogen decompression procedure is accompanied by an adiabatic expansion that cools the sample instead of heating it.
757: 569: 262:. The sample and tiny beads are agitated at about 2000 oscillations per minute in specially designed reciprocating shakers driven by high power 672:"Hands-free Sample Homogenization and Protein Extraction from Small Tissue Biopsy Samples using Pressure Cycling Technology and PCT µPestle" 733: 723:
Evaluation of the Microfluidizer for Cell Disruption of Yeast and Chlorella by E. Uera-Santos, C.D. Copple, EA Davis and WG. Hagar.
696:
Evaluation of the Microfluidizer for Cell Disruption of Yeast and Chlorella by E. Uera-Santos, C.D. Copple, EA Davis and WG. Hagar.
409:
For nitrogen decompression, large quantities of nitrogen are first dissolved in the cell under high pressure within a suitable
97: 69: 594: 213:
or subcellular preparations. The method, often called "bead beating", works well for all types of cellular material - from
492:, and produce uniform and repeatable homogenates without subjecting the sample to extreme chemical or physical stress. 465: 76: 362:
a company called Arthur D. Little and was first developed and utilized in the 1980s, initially starting as a tool for
346:
hydraulic machines offer superior lysing ability, especially when processing harder to break samples such as yeast or
116: 50: 436:
The blanket of inert nitrogen gas that saturates the cell suspension and the homogenate offers protection against
381:
are generated that rupture the cells. This method of cell lysis can yield breakage of over 90% of E. coli cells.
386: 83: 671: 374: 54: 357:
The Microfluidizer method used for cell disruption strongly influences the physicochemical properties of the
65: 17: 469: 258:
In most laboratories, bead beating is done in batch sizes of one to twenty-four sealed, plastic vials or
543: 339: 206: 477: 670:
Shao, Shiying; Gross, Vera; Yan, Wen; Guo, Tiannan; Lazarev, Alexander; Aebersold, Ruedi (2015).
43: 338:
Since the 1940s high pressure has been used as a method of cell disruption, most notably by the
533: 347: 190: 787: 90: 306: 296:
A different bead beater configuration, suitable for larger sample volumes, uses a rotating
8: 244: 141: 430: 198: 734:"Parr Instruments - Cell Disruption Vessel, 1 gallon internal volume - John Morris" 271: 243:. While processing times are slow, taking 3–10 times longer than that in specialty 194: 449: 410: 302: 290: 259: 619: 598: 499:
and other membrane-bound cells. It has also been used successfully for treating
660:
Under Pressure, M. Lougher, European Biopharmaceutical Review, July 2016; 12-16
441: 366:
creation. It has since been used in other applications such as cell disruption
263: 166: 145: 519:
and other materials with tough cell walls do not respond well to this method.
781: 485: 445: 401:
Microfluidizer technology scales from one milliliter to thousands of liters.
218: 210: 567: 297: 278:
can be controlled by bead beating for short time intervals with cooling on
240: 222: 202: 189:
beads, 0.1–2 mm (0.004–0.08 in) in diameter, mixed with a sample
161: 548: 489: 461: 251:
diameter), bead composition (glass, ceramic, steel) and bead load in the
538: 500: 481: 425: 378: 129: 504: 496: 437: 421: 286: 177:
A common laboratory-scale mechanical method for cell disruption uses
503:, for releasing virus from fertilized eggs and for treating fragile 32: 453: 367: 363: 314: 283: 233: 182: 157: 516: 512: 417: 247:, it works well for easily disrupted cells and is inexpensive. 528: 508: 358: 310: 229: 226: 214: 186: 178: 252: 156:
The production of biologically interesting molecules using
282:
between each interval, by processing vials in pre-chilled
279: 507:. It is not recommended for untreated bacterial cells. 305:. Currently, these machines are limited to processing 452:
and compressed air have been used in this technique,
495:
The method is particularly well suited for treating
377:with fixed geometry, and an intensifier pump, high 370:, and solid particle size reduction, among others. 57:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 568:EMBL - Office of Information and Public Affairs. 779: 333: 669: 225:tissues. It is the most widely used method of 416:Nitrogen decompression is more protective of 440:of cell components. Although other gases: 404: 293:through the machine during bead beating. 117:Learn how and when to remove this message 678:. Institute of Molecular Systems Biology 464:substances are not exposed to continued 128: 473:Cell-free homogenates can be produced. 394:additional passes through the machine. 14: 780: 140:is a method or process for releasing 320: 55:adding citations to reliable sources 26: 24: 480:cells and tissues, release intact 25: 799: 620:"BioSpec Products • Bead Loaders" 385:temperatures is extremely short ( 31: 750: 726: 717: 708: 699: 42:needs additional citations for 690: 663: 654: 644: 635: 626: 612: 587: 561: 172: 13: 1: 554: 334:High Pressure Cell Disruption 201:. Unlike some other methods, 7: 522: 398:centrifugation separation. 10: 804: 544:Homogenization (chemistry) 340:French Pressure Cell Press 151: 476:The technique is used to 133:Laboratory cell disruptor 676:Pressure Biosciences Inc 199:intracellular components 762:Parr Instrument Company 738:www.johnmorrisgroup.com 209:resulting in excellent 570:"Protein Purification" 534:Ultrasonic homogenizer 405:Nitrogen decompression 348:Gram-positive bacteria 134: 307:unicellular organisms 132: 142:biological molecules 51:improve this article 205:is moderate during 289:or by circulating 135: 595:"Bead Dispensers" 488:, release labile 321:Cryopulverization 272:microtiter plates 127: 126: 119: 101: 66:"Cell disruption" 16:(Redirected from 795: 772: 771: 769: 768: 754: 748: 747: 745: 744: 730: 724: 721: 715: 712: 706: 703: 697: 694: 688: 687: 685: 683: 667: 661: 658: 652: 648: 642: 639: 633: 630: 624: 623: 616: 610: 609: 607: 606: 597:. Archived from 591: 585: 584: 582: 580: 565: 260:centrifuge tubes 245:shaking machines 236:in the process. 203:mechanical shear 195:aqueous solution 122: 115: 111: 108: 102: 100: 59: 35: 27: 21: 803: 802: 798: 797: 796: 794: 793: 792: 778: 777: 776: 775: 766: 764: 756: 755: 751: 742: 740: 732: 731: 727: 722: 718: 713: 709: 704: 700: 695: 691: 681: 679: 668: 664: 659: 655: 649: 645: 640: 636: 631: 627: 618: 617: 613: 604: 602: 593: 592: 588: 578: 576: 566: 562: 557: 525: 460:Once released, 450:carbon monoxide 411:pressure vessel 407: 336: 323: 309:such as yeast, 303:cell suspension 291:gaseous coolant 264:electric motors 175: 154: 138:Cell disruption 123: 112: 106: 103: 60: 58: 48: 36: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 801: 791: 790: 774: 773: 758:"Applications" 749: 725: 716: 707: 698: 689: 662: 653: 643: 634: 625: 611: 586: 559: 558: 556: 553: 552: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 524: 521: 486:cell membranes 442:carbon dioxide 406: 403: 387:residence time 335: 332: 322: 319: 207:homogenization 174: 171: 167:cell unroofing 153: 150: 144:from inside a 125: 124: 39: 37: 30: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 800: 789: 786: 785: 783: 763: 759: 753: 739: 735: 729: 720: 711: 702: 693: 677: 673: 666: 657: 647: 638: 629: 621: 615: 601:on 2017-04-25 600: 596: 590: 575: 571: 564: 560: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 526: 520: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 493: 491: 487: 483: 479: 474: 471: 467: 463: 458: 455: 451: 447: 446:nitrous oxide 443: 439: 434: 432: 427: 423: 419: 414: 412: 402: 399: 395: 391: 388: 382: 380: 376: 375:microchannels 371: 369: 368:nanoemulsions 365: 360: 355: 351: 349: 343: 341: 331: 327: 318: 316: 312: 308: 304: 299: 294: 292: 288: 285: 281: 275: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 254: 248: 246: 242: 237: 235: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 170: 168: 163: 159: 149: 147: 143: 139: 131: 121: 118: 110: 107:November 2008 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 71: 68: â€“  67: 63: 62:Find sources: 56: 52: 46: 45: 40:This article 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 788:Cell biology 765:. Retrieved 761: 752: 741:. Retrieved 737: 728: 719: 710: 701: 692: 680:. Retrieved 675: 665: 656: 646: 637: 628: 614: 603:. Retrieved 599:the original 589: 577:. Retrieved 573: 563: 494: 490:biochemicals 475: 459: 435: 415: 408: 400: 396: 392: 383: 372: 356: 352: 344: 337: 328: 324: 298:fluorocarbon 295: 287:vial holders 276: 267: 257: 249: 241:vortex mixer 238: 176: 155: 137: 136: 113: 104: 94: 87: 80: 73: 61: 49:Please help 44:verification 41: 18:Bead beating 549:Homogenizer 501:plant cells 468:that might 462:subcellular 379:shear rates 173:Bead method 767:2019-12-13 743:2019-12-13 682:9 November 605:2017-04-24 555:References 539:Sonication 484:, prepare 482:organelles 478:homogenize 426:ultrasonic 422:organelles 77:newspapers 497:mammalian 466:attrition 438:oxidation 373:By using 268:SoniBeast 191:suspended 162:culturing 782:Category 523:See also 505:bacteria 470:denature 454:nitrogen 431:shearing 364:liposome 315:bacteria 284:aluminum 234:aerosols 211:membrane 574:embl.de 418:enzymes 183:ceramic 158:cloning 152:Methods 91:scholar 579:19 May 517:spores 513:fungus 219:animal 215:spores 193:in an 93:  86:  79:  72:  64:  651:York. 529:Lysis 509:Yeast 424:than 359:lysed 311:algae 230:lysis 227:yeast 223:plant 187:steel 185:, or 179:glass 98:JSTOR 84:books 684:2022 581:2015 420:and 313:and 253:vial 221:and 160:and 146:cell 70:news 280:ice 217:to 53:by 784:: 760:. 736:. 674:. 572:. 515:, 511:, 448:, 444:, 317:. 255:. 181:, 169:. 148:. 770:. 746:. 686:. 622:. 608:. 583:. 120:) 114:( 109:) 105:( 95:· 88:· 81:· 74:· 47:. 20:)

Index

Bead beating

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Cell disruption"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

biological molecules
cell
cloning
culturing
cell unroofing
glass
ceramic
steel
suspended
aqueous solution
intracellular components
mechanical shear
homogenization
membrane
spores
animal
plant

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑