Knowledge

Certificate authority

Source đź“ť

383:(EV) certificates as a more rigorous alternative to domain validated certificates. Extended validation is intended to verify not only control of a domain name, but additional identity information to be included in the certificate. Some browsers display this additional identity information in a green box in the URL bar. One limitation of EV as a solution to the weaknesses of domain validation is that attackers could still obtain a domain validated certificate for the victim domain, and deploy it during an attack; if that occurred, the difference observable to the victim user would be the absence of a green bar with the company name. There is some question as to whether users would be likely to recognise this absence as indicative of an attack being in progress: a test using 792:
is a serious shortcoming given that the most commonly encountered technology employing X.509 and trusted third parties is the HTTPS protocol. As all major web browsers are distributed to their end-users pre-configured with a list of trusted CAs that numbers in the dozens this means that any one of these pre-approved trusted CAs can issue a valid certificate for any domain whatsoever. The industry response to this has been muted. Given that the contents of a browser's pre-configured trusted CA list is determined independently by the party that is distributing or causing to be installed the browser application there is really nothing that the CAs themselves can do.
472: 140:) to a Card Issuing Bank to transfer the funds from the card holder's bank account to the payment recipient's bank account. Each payment card presents along with its card data also the Card Issuer Certificate to the POS. The Issuer Certificate is signed by EMV CA Certificate. The POS retrieves the public key of EMV CA from its storage, validates the Issuer Certificate and authenticity of the payment card before sending the payment request to the payment scheme. 39:. A digital certificate certifies the ownership of a public key by the named subject of the certificate. This allows others (relying parties) to rely upon signatures or on assertions made about the private key that corresponds to the certified public key. A CA acts as a trusted third party—trusted both by the subject (owner) of the certificate and by the party relying upon the certificate. The format of these certificates is specified by the 706:
name, might be true, increasing the certificate's credibility. Eve, however, would have the all-important private key associated with the certificate. Eve could then use the certificate to send a digitally signed email to Bob, tricking Bob into believing that the email was from Alice. Bob might even respond with encrypted email, believing that it could only be read by Alice, when Eve is actually able to decrypt it using the private key.
71:. The client uses the CA certificate to authenticate the CA signature on the server certificate, as part of the authorizations before launching a secure connection. Usually, client software—for example, browsers—include a set of trusted CA certificates. This makes sense, as many users need to trust their client software. A malicious or compromised client can skip any security check and still fool its users into believing otherwise. 491:
server or other entity noted in the certificate. A CA's obligation in such schemes is to verify an applicant's credentials, so that users and relying parties can trust the information in the issued certificate. CAs use a variety of standards and tests to do so. In essence, the certificate authority is responsible for saying "yes, this person is who they say they are, and we, the CA, certify that".
226:
servers. The top spot has been held by Symantec (or VeriSign before it was purchased by Symantec) ever since survey began, with it currently accounting for just under a third of all certificates. To illustrate the effect of differing methodologies, amongst the million busiest sites Symantec issued 44% of the valid, trusted certificates in use — significantly more than its overall market share."
791:
The critical weakness in the way that the current X.509 scheme is implemented is that any CA trusted by a particular party can then issue certificates for any domain they choose. Such certificates will be accepted as valid by the trusting party whether they are legitimate and authorized or not. This
535:
It is difficult to assure correctness of match between data and entity when the data are presented to the CA (perhaps over an electronic network), and when the credentials of the person/company/program asking for a certificate are likewise presented. This is why commercial CAs often use a combination
509:
protocol. In this example let us suppose that the user logs on to their bank's homepage www.bank.example to do online banking. When the user opens www.bank.example homepage, they receive a public key along with all the data that their web-browser displays. The public key could be used to encrypt data
713:
issued two certificates to a person claiming to represent Microsoft. The certificates have the name "Microsoft Corporation", so they could be used to spoof someone into believing that updates to Microsoft software came from Microsoft when they actually did not. The fraud was detected in early 2001.
510:
from the client to the server but the safe procedure is to use it in a protocol that determines a temporary shared symmetric encryption key; messages in such a key exchange protocol can be enciphered with the bank's public key in such a way that only the bank server has the private key to read them.
225:
in May 2015, the industry standard for monitoring active TLS certificates, "Although the global ecosystem is competitive, it is dominated by a handful of major CAs — three certificate authorities (Symantec, Comodo, GoDaddy) account for three-quarters of all issued certificates on public-facing web
763:
An attacker who steals a certificate authority's private keys is able to forge certificates as if they were CA, without needed ongoing access to the CA's systems. Key theft is therefore one of the main risks certificate authorities defend against. Publicly trusted CAs almost always store their keys
705:
For example, suppose an attacker, Eve, manages to get a CA to issue to her a certificate that claims to represent Alice. That is, the certificate would publicly state that it represents Alice, and might include other information about Alice. Some of the information about Alice, such as her employer
564:
Despite the security measures undertaken to correctly verify the identities of people and companies, there is a risk of a single CA issuing a bogus certificate to an imposter. It is also possible to register individuals and companies with the same or very similar names, which may lead to confusion.
517:
This mechanism is only safe if the user can be sure that it is the bank that they see in their web browser. If the user types in www.bank.example, but their communication is hijacked and a fake website (that pretends to be the bank website) sends the page information back to the user's browser, the
458:
Baseline Requirements, adopted November 2011, specified a list of such addresses. This allowed mail hosts to reserve those addresses for administrative use, though such precautions are still not universal. In January 2015, a Finnish man registered the username "hostmaster" at the Finnish version of
74:
The clients of a CA are server supervisors who call for a certificate that their servers will bestow to users. Commercial CAs charge money to issue certificates, and their customers anticipate the CA's certificate to be contained within the majority of web browsers, so that safe connections to the
610:
For distributing revocation information to clients, timeliness of the discovery of revocation (and hence the window for an attacker to exploit a compromised certificate) trades off against resource usage in querying revocation statuses and privacy concerns. If revocation information is unavailable
521:
This is what the certificate authority mechanism is intended to prevent. A certificate authority (CA) is an organization that stores public keys and their owners, and every party in a communication trusts this organization (and knows its public key). When the user's web browser receives the public
143:
Browsers and other clients of sorts characteristically allow users to add or do away with CA certificates at will. While server certificates regularly last for a relatively short period, CA certificates are further extended, so, for repeatedly visited servers, it is less error-prone importing and
526:
certificate). The browser already possesses the public key of the CA and consequently can verify the signature, trust the certificate and the public key in it: since www.bank.example uses a public key that the certification authority certifies, a fake www.bank.example can only use the same public
490:
and the identity of the owner. The matching private key is not made available publicly, but kept secret by the end user who generated the key pair. The certificate is also a confirmation or validation by the CA that the public key contained in the certificate belongs to the person, organization,
399:
Domain validation suffers from certain structural security limitations. In particular, it is always vulnerable to attacks that allow an adversary to observe the domain validation probes that CAs send. These can include attacks against the DNS, TCP, or BGP protocols (which lack the cryptographic
513:
The rest of the communication then proceeds using the new (disposable) symmetric key, so when the user enters some information to the bank's page and submits the page (sends the information back to the bank) then the data the user has entered to the page will be encrypted by their web browser.
164:
Worldwide, the certificate authority business is fragmented, with national or regional providers dominating their home market. This is because many uses of digital certificates, such as for legally binding digital signatures, are linked to local law, regulations, and accreditation schemes for
403:
One of the most common domain validation techniques involves sending an email containing an authentication token or link to an email address that is likely to be administratively responsible for the domain. This could be the technical contact email address listed in the domain's
731:
In 2012, it became known that Trustwave issued a subordinate root certificate that was used for transparent traffic management (man-in-the-middle) which effectively permitted an enterprise to sniff SSL internal network traffic using the subordinate certificate.
552:
has been to "prevent conflicting and overly burdensome local regulation and to establish that electronic writings satisfy the traditional requirements associated with paper documents." Further the US E-Sign statute and the suggested UETA code help ensure that:
445:
Domain validation implementations have sometimes been a source of security vulnerabilities. In one instance, security researchers showed that attackers could obtain certificates for webmail sites because a CA was willing to use an email address like
598:
A certificate may be revoked before it expires, which signals that it is no longer valid. Without revocation, an attacker would be able to exploit such a compromised or misissued certificate until expiry. Hence, revocation is an important part of a
518:
fake web-page can send a fake public key to the user (for which the fake site owns a matching private key). The user will fill the form with their personal data and will submit the page. The fake web-page will then get access to the user's data.
739:
malware (also known as SkyWiper) contained modules that had an MD5 collision with a valid certificate issued by a Microsoft Terminal Server licensing certificate that used the broken MD5 hash algorithm. The authors thus was able to conduct a
776:, except when it is needed to sign shorter-lived intermediate certificates. The intermediate certificates, stored in an online HSM, can do the day-to-day work of signing end-entity certificates and keeping revocation information up to date. 650:(CASC) – In February 2013, the CASC was founded as an industry advocacy organization dedicated to addressing industry issues and educating the public on internet security. The founding members are the seven largest Certificate Authorities. 66:
to a server via the Internet. A certificate is essential in order to circumvent a malicious party which happens to be on the route to a target server which acts as if it were the target. Such a scenario is commonly referred to as a
1453: 768:(HSM), which allows them to sign certificates with a key, but generally prevent extraction of that key with both physical and software controls. CAs typically take the further precaution of keeping the key for their long-term 536:
of authentication techniques including leveraging government bureaus, the payment infrastructure, third parties' databases and services, and custom heuristics. In some enterprise systems, local forms of authentication such as
372:" to authenticate the recipient of the certificate. The techniques used for domain validation vary between CAs, but in general domain validation techniques are meant to prove that the certificate applicant controls a given 1929: 579:
In large-scale deployments, Alice may not be familiar with Bob's certificate authority (perhaps they each have a different CA server), so Bob's certificate may also include his CA's public key signed by a different
155:
and, since authors and receivers of encrypted messages, apparently, know one another, the usefulness of a trusted third party remains confined to the signature verification of messages sent to public mailing lists.
453:
Prior to 2011, there was no standard list of email addresses that could be used for domain validation, so it was not clear to email administrators which addresses needed to be reserved. The first version of the
687:
The CA/Browser Forum publishes the Baseline Requirements, a list of policies and technical requirements for CAs to follow. These are a requirement for inclusion in the certificate stores of Firefox and Safari.
1375: 1098: 75:
certified servers work efficiently out-of-the-box. The quantity of internet browsers, other devices and applications which trust a particular certificate authority is referred to as ubiquity.
2193: 1445: 560:
a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation.
2271: 2526:
Larisch, James; Choffnes, David; Levin, Dave; Maggs, Bruce M.; Mislove, Alan; Wilson, Christo (2017). "CRLite: A Scalable System for Pushing All TLS Revocations to All Browsers".
1937: 494:
If the user trusts the CA and can verify the CA's signature, then they can also assume that a certain public key does indeed belong to whoever is identified in the certificate.
2063: 2427: 54:, the secure browsing protocol for the World Wide Web. Another common use is in issuing identity cards by national governments for use in electronically signing documents. 2484:
Chung, Taejoong; Lok, Jay; Chandrasekaran, Balakrishnan; Choffnes, David; Levin, Dave; Maggs, Bruce M.; Mislove, Alan; Rula, John; Sullivan, Nick; Wilson, Christo (2018).
557:
a signature, contract or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and
670:– In 2005, a new consortium of Certificate Authorities and web browser vendors was formed to promote industry standards and baseline requirements for internet security. 442:
in the domain. The theory behind domain validation is that only the legitimate owner of a domain would be able to read emails sent to these administrative addresses.
2363: 1428: 1367: 544:
are required in some cases to personally know the party whose signature is being notarized; this is a higher standard than is reached by many CAs. According to the
102:. Some large cloud computing and web hosting companies are also publicly-trusted CAs and issue certificates to services hosted on their infrastructure, for example 1091: 1907: 514:
Therefore, even if someone can access the (encrypted) data that was communicated from the user to www.bank.example, such eavesdropper cannot read or decipher it.
1565: 2219: 638:
presents connection latency and privacy issues. Other schemes have been proposed but have not yet been successfully deployed to enable fail-hard checking.
1207: 1015: 1286: 391:, shows a significantly greater difference between EV and domain validated certificates, with domain validated certificates having a hollow, grey lock. 2009: 2189: 400:
protections of TLS/SSL), or the compromise of routers. Such attacks are possible either on the network near a CA, or near the victim domain itself.
2249: 527:
key. Since the fake www.bank.example does not know the corresponding private key, it cannot create the signature needed to verify its authenticity.
702:
If the CA can be subverted, then the security of the entire system is lost, potentially subverting all the entities that trust the compromised CA.
136:
payment cards are governed by the EMV Certificate Authority, payment schemes that route payment transactions initiated at Point of Sale Terminals (
2467: 1471: 147:
Less often, trustworthy certificates are used for encrypting or signing messages. CAs dispense end-user certificates too, which can be used with
952: 1506: 1232: 79:, which is a non-profit business, issues several commercial CA certificates with its products. While Mozilla developed their own policy, the 2892: 2441: 505:
can be used to encrypt data communicated between two parties. This can typically happen when a user logs on to any site that implements the
2768: 2263: 1508:
Applied Cryptography and Network Security: Second International Conference, ACNS 2004, Yellow Mountain, China, June 8-11, 2004. Proceedings
2460:"In the Wake of Unauthorized Certificate Issuance by the Indian CA NIC, can Government CAs Still be Considered "Trusted Third Parties"?" 2089: 2713: 2342: 796: 2719: 748: 653: 2417: 2059: 2037: 176:
due to the technical requirements. While not legally required, new providers may choose to undergo annual security audits (such as
1343: 1532: 2863: 2707: 1492: 1419: 800: 647: 717:
In 2008, Comodo reseller Certstar sold a certificate for mozilla.com to Eddy Nigg, who had no authority to represent Mozilla.
2610: 2545: 1044: 584:, which is presumably recognizable by Alice. This process typically leads to a hierarchy or mesh of CAs and CA certificates. 2163: 2115: 450:
for domain.com, but not all webmail systems had reserved the "ssladmin" username to prevent attackers from registering it.
244:
top 10 million and the Tranco top 1 million websites, lists the six largest authorities by absolute usage share as below.
751:
issued unauthorized certificates for Google domains. Google thus removed both MCS and the root certificate authority from
214:
as well as software to enable installation and maintenance of certificates. Let's Encrypt is operated by the newly formed
3164: 2985: 2367: 1404: 98:
In addition to commercial CAs, some non-profits issue publicly-trusted digital certificates without charge, for example
3204: 2801: 1915: 822: 635: 1593: 522:
key from www.bank.example it also receives a digital signature of the key (with some more information, in a so-called
3209: 2907: 2695: 2666: 2508: 1542: 1516: 1175: 1130: 387:
in 2009 showed that the absence of IE7's EV warnings were not noticed by users, however Microsoft's current browser,
2317: 2292: 2141: 1558: 721: 240:
As of July 2024 the survey company W3Techs, which collects statistics on certificate authority usage among the
3194: 3189: 3128: 1702:
Deterministic Usage of the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)
463:
and was able to obtain a domain-validated certificate for live.fi, despite not being the owner of the domain name.
215: 2820: 2215: 1788: 1741: 1663: 1621: 604: 380: 234: 848: 144:
trusting the CA issued, rather than confirm a security exemption each time the server's certificate is renewed.
3133: 2730: 1199: 548:
outline on Online Transaction Management the primary points of US Federal and State statutes enacted regarding
203: 199:. As of Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean), Android currently contains over 100 CAs that are updated with each release. 2591:
Smith, Trevor; Dickinson, Luke; Seamons, Kent (2020). "Let's Revoke: Scalable Global Certificate Revocation".
2392: 1278: 626:
Due to the cost of revocation checks and the availability impact from potentially-unreliable remote services,
83:
developed similar guidelines for CA trust. A single CA certificate may be shared among multiple CAs or their
2566:
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
724:, allegedly by Iranian hackers. There is evidence that the fraudulent DigiNotar certificates were used in a 471: 2002: 1257: 2945: 2915: 2814: 2138:"Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-017: Erroneous VeriSign-Issued Digital Certificates Pose Spoofing Hazard" 924: 631: 369: 368:
The commercial CAs that issue the bulk of certificates for HTTPS servers typically use a technique called "
1000: 2925: 2795: 2241: 1955: 909: 187:
As of 24 August 2020, 147 root certificates, representing 52 organizations, are trusted in the
803:(DNSSEC) DANE will greatly reduce if not eliminate the role of trusted third parties in a domain's PKI. 3106: 2869: 2459: 1980: 1467: 1069: 948: 572:
proposes auditing all certificates in a public unforgeable log, which could help in the prevention of
2965: 2897: 2836: 600: 122: 3086: 3049: 3016: 2689: 2675: 2485: 1842: 1840: 1300: 765: 725: 566: 545: 68: 63: 1228: 3199: 2847: 2831: 2736: 1446:"A Finnish man created this simple email account - and received Microsoft's security certificate" 1337:"Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates, v.1.2.3" 502: 126: 1837: 783:
when generating signing keys, in order to ensure that the keys are not tampered with or copied.
2826: 2790: 2701: 2634: 593: 476: 425: 233:, "DigiCert is the world's largest high-assurance certificate authority, commanding 60% of the 169: 36: 3153: 3054: 2659: 2085: 115: 2216:"Another fraudulent certificate raises the same old questions about certificate authorities" 1318: 675: 661: 656:(CCSF) – In 2009 the CCSF was founded to promote industry standards that protect end users. 2580: 2293:"Flame malware collision attack explained | MSRC Blog | Microsoft Security Response Center" 1810: 1763: 1724: 1685: 1643: 812: 709:
A notable case of CA subversion like this occurred in 2001, when the certificate authority
540:
can be used to obtain a certificate which can in turn be used by external relying parties.
994: 172:
is largely held by a small number of multinational companies. This market has significant
8: 697: 537: 483: 384: 107: 2033: 1040: 50:
One particularly common use for certificate authorities is to sign certificates used in
3070: 2785: 2616: 2551: 2514: 1336: 773: 152: 202:
On November 18, 2014, a group of companies and nonprofit organizations, including the
3021: 2747: 2620: 2606: 2541: 2504: 1802: 1755: 1716: 1677: 1635: 1538: 1512: 1319:"Usage statistics of SSL certificate authorities for websites, August 2024 - W3Techs" 996: 891: 837: 549: 196: 173: 2518: 3026: 2842: 2780: 2652: 2596: 2570: 2555: 2531: 2496: 1792: 1745: 1706: 1667: 1625: 881: 769: 741: 667: 455: 267: 207: 137: 99: 80: 2111: 678:
organized the first meeting and is considered the founder of the CA/Browser Forum.
191:
web browser, 168 root certificates, representing 60 organizations, are trusted by
184:
in Europe) to be included as a trusted root by a web browser or operating system.
2752: 1301:"DigiCert - World's Largest High-Assurance Certificate Authority | Netcraft" 736: 630:
limit the revocation checks they will perform, and will fail-soft where they do.
188: 2583: 2564: 1819: 1813: 1782: 1776: 1772: 1766: 1735: 1727: 1700: 1694: 1688: 1657: 1646: 1615: 886: 869: 747:
In 2015, a Chinese certificate authority named MCS Holdings and affiliated with
832: 460: 388: 241: 1396: 3183: 2807: 2742: 2601: 1806: 1759: 1720: 1681: 1639: 895: 752: 541: 2500: 1092:"Standards and Industry Regulations Applicable to Certification Authorities" 786: 195:, and 255 root certificates, representing 101 organizations, are trusted by 3101: 2875: 2418:"Symantec sacks staff for issuing unauthorized Google certificates - ZDNet" 2393:"China's CNNIC issues false certificates in serious breach of crypto trust" 1852: 1151: 827: 817: 780: 671: 657: 627: 616: 20: 1589: 1122: 2137: 506: 373: 2343:"CA Linked to Chinese Registrar Issued Unauthorized Google Certificates" 2318:"Crypto breakthrough shows Flame was designed by world-class scientists" 1908:"Multivendor power council formed to address digital certificate issues" 1876: 1737:
Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
623:
and treat it as unrevoked (and allow attackers to sidestep revocation).
430:
the domain. Some Certificate Authorities may accept confirmation using
210:, a nonprofit certificate authority that provides free domain validated 3148: 2536: 2164:"SSL Certificate Vendor Sells Mozilla.com CSSL Certificate to Some Guy" 487: 283: 111: 2563:
Sheffer, Yaron; Saint-Andre, Pierre; Fossati, Thomas (November 2022).
1613: 973: 714:
Microsoft and VeriSign took steps to limit the impact of the problem.
611:(either due to accident or an attack), clients must decide whether to 3143: 2955: 2920: 2575: 1797: 1750: 1711: 1672: 1630: 842: 299: 103: 84: 1888: 2960: 2950: 2935: 1864: 710: 573: 331: 230: 222: 177: 2593:
Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
2190:"Independent Iranian hacker claims responsibility for Comodo hack" 1825: 1152:"List of available trusted root certificates in macOS High Sierra" 121:
Large organizations or government bodies may have their own PKIs (
3000: 2995: 2980: 2970: 1930:"Major Certificate Authorities Unite In The Name Of SSL Security" 1253: 1011: 348: 315: 237:
market, and 96% of organization-validated certificates globally.
76: 795:
This issue is the driving impetus behind the development of the
3158: 3111: 3091: 2990: 2975: 2940: 148: 2644: 2483: 1951: 1858: 720:
In 2011 fraudulent certificates were obtained from Comodo and
603:. Revocation is performed by the issuing CA, which produces a 3138: 3096: 2930: 2725: 2422: 523: 405: 218:, a California nonprofit recognized as federally tax-exempt. 211: 192: 51: 40: 1976: 615:
and treat a certificate as if it is revoked (and so degrade
1065: 181: 2562: 2525: 2242:"Inside 'Operation Black Tulip': DigiNotar hack analysed" 1882: 1846: 787:
Implementation weakness of the trusted third party scheme
133: 44: 1614:
Laurie, Ben; Langley, Adam; Kasper, Emilia (June 2013).
2493:
Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018
870:"Dynamic Public Key Certificates with Forward Secrecy" 376:, not any information about the applicant's identity. 95:
CA certificates with varying validation requirements.
2590: 2442:"Unauthorized Google Digital Certificates Discovered" 1894: 1870: 1831: 1534:
The Shortcut Guide to Managing Certificate Lifecycles
1368:"CA/Forbidden or Problematic Practices - MozillaWiki" 976:. EMV Certificate Authority Worldwide. 2 October 2010 151:. However, encryption entails the receiver's public 2635:
How secure is HTTPS today? How often is it attacked?
1659:
A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Examples
2264:"Trustwave issued a man-in-the-middle certificate" 1784:Autonomous System (AS) Reservation for Private Use 1397:"SSL FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions - Rapid SSL" 634:are too bandwidth-costly for routine use, and the 125:), each containing their own CAs. Any site using 229:In 2020, according to independent survey company 180:for certificate authorities in North America and 91:CA certificate may be the base to issue multiple 3181: 2528:2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) 949:"Mozilla Included CA Certificate List — Mozilla" 925:"How do Digital Certificates Work - An Overview" 799:(DANE) protocol. If adopted in conjunction with 2690:Transport Layer Security / Secure Sockets Layer 2135: 995:Zakir Durumeric; James Kasten; Michael Bailey; 2155: 1655: 1229:"Let's Encrypt: Delivering SSL/TLS Everywhere" 35:) is an entity that stores, signs, and issues 2893:Export of cryptography from the United States 2660: 1421:Criminal charges are not pursued: Hacking PKI 1001:"Analysis of the HTTPS Certificate Ecosystem" 2769:Automated Certificate Management Environment 1780: 1468:"Responsibilities of Certificate Authority" 62:Trusted certificates can be used to create 2714:DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities 2667: 2653: 2368:"Maintaining digital certificate security" 797:DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities 2720:DNS Certification Authority Authorization 2600: 2574: 2535: 2390: 1796: 1749: 1710: 1698: 1671: 1629: 1089: 885: 744:with the hash listed in the certificate. 654:Common Computing Security Standards Forum 641: 587: 168:However, the market for globally trusted 2486:"Is the Web Ready for OCSP Must-Staple?" 1176:"Microsoft Included CA Certificate List" 682: 470: 466: 394: 379:Many Certificate Authorities also offer 206:, Mozilla, Cisco, and Akamai, announced 2362: 1847:Sheffer, Saint-Andre & Fossati 2022 1733: 1607: 910:"What is a certificate authority (CA)?" 408:entry, or an administrative email like 363: 16:Entity that issues digital certificates 3182: 2864:Domain Name System Security Extensions 2708:Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation 2340: 2315: 2239: 2213: 2187: 1417: 1279:"Counting SSL certificates - Netcraft" 922: 801:Domain Name System Security Extensions 664:is considered the founder of the CCSF. 648:Certificate Authority Security Council 2648: 1021:from the original on 22 December 2013 867: 2470:from the original on 3 October 2016. 1293: 966: 2415: 2196:from the original on 29 August 2011 2161: 2040:from the original on 7 January 2014 1936:. February 14, 2013. Archived from 1914:. February 14, 2013. Archived from 1895:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1871:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1832:Smith, Dickinson & Seamons 2020 1779:. |- |6996 |Best Current Practice | 1559:"Electronic Signatures and Records" 1008:The Internet Measurement Conference 755:and have revoked the certificates. 13: 2802:Online Certificate Status Protocol 2092:from the original on 20 March 2017 2066:from the original on 15 April 2017 2000: 823:People for Internet Responsibility 636:Online Certificate Status Protocol 14: 3221: 2696:Datagram Transport Layer Security 2628: 1654:|- |6963 |Best Current Practice | 3129:Certificate authority compromise 2430:from the original on 2016-10-02. 2397:Committee to Protect Journalists 2252:from the original on 2017-07-03. 2086:"Apple Root Certificate Program" 1537:. Realtimepublishers.com. 2006. 1456:from the original on 2015-08-08. 1434:from the original on 2013-04-15. 1407:from the original on 2015-02-06. 1289:from the original on 2015-05-16. 1231:(Press release). Let's Encrypt. 691: 216:Internet Security Research Group 3134:Random number generator attacks 2821:Extended Validation Certificate 2674: 2452: 2434: 2409: 2384: 2356: 2334: 2309: 2285: 2274:from the original on 2012-03-13 2256: 2233: 2222:from the original on 2011-09-12 2207: 2188:Bright, Peter (28 March 2011). 2181: 2144:from the original on 2011-10-26 2129: 2118:from the original on 2013-11-02 2104: 2078: 2052: 2036:. CAB Forum. 4 September 2013. 2026: 2015:from the original on 2013-05-12 1994: 1983:from the original on 2013-05-12 1969: 1958:from the original on 2014-08-23 1944: 1922: 1900: 1789:Internet Engineering Task Force 1742:Internet Engineering Task Force 1732:| |- |6980 |Proposed Standard | 1664:Internet Engineering Task Force 1622:Internet Engineering Task Force 1596:from the original on 2013-11-01 1582: 1571:from the original on 2016-03-04 1551: 1525: 1499: 1485: 1474:from the original on 2015-02-12 1460: 1438: 1411: 1389: 1378:from the original on 2017-07-21 1360: 1349:from the original on 2015-03-23 1329: 1311: 1271: 1260:from the original on 2015-06-10 1246: 1235:from the original on 2014-11-18 1221: 1210:from the original on 2017-07-08 1192: 1168: 1144: 1133:from the original on 2017-03-25 1115: 1104:from the original on 2016-03-04 1072:from the original on 2013-08-18 1047:from the original on 2015-11-03 955:from the original on 2013-08-04 749:China's central domain registry 605:cryptographically authenticated 235:Extended Validation Certificate 2731:HTTP Strict Transport Security 2639:Electronic Frontier Foundation 2477: 2136:Microsoft, Inc. (2007-02-21). 2114:. Cert.org. 31 December 2001. 1849:, 7.5. Certificate Revocation. 1123:"CA:IncludedCAs - MozillaWiki" 1083: 1058: 1033: 988: 941: 916: 902: 861: 758: 316:Sectigo (Comodo Cybersecurity) 204:Electronic Frontier Foundation 1: 2391:Lowenthal, Tom (2015-03-31). 2341:Fisher, Dennis (2015-03-23). 1822:. |} 1200:"Security with HTTPS and SSL" 1180:ccadb-public.secure.force.com 1041:"What is an SSL Certificate?" 868:Chien, Hung-Yu (2021-08-19). 855: 565:To minimize this hazard, the 475:The procedure of obtaining a 2815:Domain-validated certificate 2214:Bright, Peter (2011-08-30). 851:certificate authority breach 845:certificate authority breach 632:Certificate revocation lists 159: 132:Commercial banks that issue 7: 2796:Certificate revocation list 2240:Leyden, John (2011-09-06). 2060:"Mozilla Root Store Policy" 1697:. |- |6979 |Informational | 1656:P. Saint-Andre (May 2013). 887:10.3390/electronics10162009 806: 530: 170:TLS/SSL server certificates 57: 10: 3226: 2870:Internet Protocol Security 2683:Protocols and technologies 2316:Goodin, Dan (2012-06-07). 2003:"CA/Browser Forum History" 1952:"CA/Browser Forum Founder" 1705:. Independent Submission. 1590:"Certificate transparency" 695: 591: 497: 3205:Public key infrastructure 3121: 3079: 3063: 3042: 3035: 3009: 2906: 2898:Server-Gated Cryptography 2885: 2856: 2837:Public key infrastructure 2762:Public-key infrastructure 2761: 2682: 1781:J. Mitchell (July 2013). 1699:T. Pornin (August 2013). 1427:. DEF CON 17. Las Vegas. 607:statement of revocation. 601:public key infrastructure 165:certificate authorities. 123:public key infrastructure 3210:Transport Layer Security 3050:Man-in-the-middle attack 3017:Certificate Transparency 2602:10.14722/ndss.2020.24084 1617:Certificate Transparency 1090:Kirk Hall (April 2013). 766:hardware security module 726:man-in-the-middle attack 568:certificate transparency 546:American Bar Association 127:self-signed certificates 69:man-in-the-middle attack 3195:Public-key cryptography 3190:Certificate authorities 3161:(in regards to TLS 1.0) 3114:(in regards to SSL 3.0) 2848:Self-signed certificate 2832:Public-key cryptography 2753:Perfect forward secrecy 2737:HTTP Public Key Pinning 2501:10.1145/3278532.3278543 2034:"Baseline Requirements" 1734:F. Gont (August 2013). 1511:. Springer. June 2004. 923:Villanueva, John Carl. 772:in an HSM that is kept 503:Public-key cryptography 29:certification authority 3165:Kazakhstan MITM attack 2827:Public key certificate 2791:Certificate revocation 2702:Server Name Indication 642:Industry organizations 594:Certificate revocation 588:Certificate revocation 479: 477:public key certificate 3154:Lucky Thirteen attack 3055:Padding oracle attack 2775:Certificate authority 1418:Zusman, Mike (2009). 1204:developer.android.com 999:(12 September 2013). 683:Baseline requirements 474: 467:Issuing a certificate 395:Validation weaknesses 116:Google Cloud Platform 25:certificate authority 2530:. pp. 539–556. 2495:. pp. 105–118. 2372:Google Security Blog 813:Validation authority 779:CAs sometimes use a 484:digital certificates 364:Validation standards 129:acts as its own CA. 37:digital certificates 1883:Larisch et al. 2017 1305:trends.netcraft.com 698:Supply chain attack 448:ssladmin@domain.com 385:Internet Explorer 7 381:Extended Validation 108:Amazon Web Services 3071:Bar mitzvah attack 2786:Certificate policy 2537:10.1109/sp.2017.17 2416:Osborne, Charlie. 2297:msrc.microsoft.com 1977:"CA/Browser Forum" 1940:on April 10, 2013. 1818:|Updates RFC  1771:|Updates RFC  1693:|Updates RFC  1495:. 17 January 2000. 676:Melih AbdulhayoÄźlu 662:Melih AbdulhayoÄźlu 550:digital signatures 480: 212:X.509 certificates 64:secure connections 3177: 3176: 3173: 3172: 2748:Opportunistic TLS 2641:(25 October 2011) 2612:978-1-891562-61-7 2547:978-1-5090-5533-3 2448:. 12 August 2014. 1918:on July 28, 2013. 1859:Chung et al. 2018 1283:news.netcraft.com 1256:. Let's Encrypt. 997:J. Alex Halderman 838:Digital signature 770:root certificates 370:domain validation 361: 360: 197:Microsoft Windows 174:barriers to entry 3217: 3040: 3039: 3027:HTTPS Everywhere 2843:Root certificate 2781:CA/Browser Forum 2669: 2662: 2655: 2646: 2645: 2624: 2604: 2587: 2578: 2576:10.17487/RFC9325 2559: 2539: 2522: 2490: 2472: 2471: 2466:. 24 July 2014. 2456: 2450: 2449: 2438: 2432: 2431: 2413: 2407: 2406: 2404: 2403: 2388: 2382: 2381: 2379: 2378: 2360: 2354: 2353: 2351: 2350: 2338: 2332: 2331: 2329: 2328: 2313: 2307: 2306: 2304: 2303: 2289: 2283: 2282: 2280: 2279: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2237: 2231: 2230: 2228: 2227: 2218:. Ars Technica. 2211: 2205: 2204: 2202: 2201: 2192:. Ars Technica. 2185: 2179: 2178: 2176: 2174: 2162:Seltzer, Larry. 2159: 2153: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2133: 2127: 2126: 2124: 2123: 2108: 2102: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2073: 2071: 2056: 2050: 2049: 2047: 2045: 2030: 2024: 2023: 2021: 2020: 2014: 2007: 2001:Wilson, Wilson. 1998: 1992: 1991: 1989: 1988: 1973: 1967: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1948: 1942: 1941: 1926: 1920: 1919: 1904: 1898: 1892: 1886: 1880: 1874: 1868: 1862: 1856: 1850: 1844: 1835: 1829: 1823: 1817: 1800: 1798:10.17487/RFC6996 1770: 1753: 1751:10.17487/RFC6980 1731: 1714: 1712:10.17487/RFC6979 1692: 1675: 1673:10.17487/RFC6963 1650: 1633: 1631:10.17487/RFC6962 1611: 1605: 1604: 1602: 1601: 1586: 1580: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1570: 1563: 1555: 1549: 1548: 1529: 1523: 1522: 1503: 1497: 1496: 1489: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1479: 1464: 1458: 1457: 1442: 1436: 1435: 1433: 1426: 1415: 1409: 1408: 1401:www.rapidssl.com 1393: 1387: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1372:wiki.mozilla.org 1364: 1358: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1348: 1341: 1333: 1327: 1326: 1315: 1309: 1308: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1275: 1269: 1268: 1266: 1265: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1240: 1225: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1196: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1172: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1148: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1127:wiki.mozilla.org 1119: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1109: 1103: 1096: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1020: 1005: 992: 986: 985: 983: 981: 970: 964: 963: 961: 960: 945: 939: 938: 936: 935: 920: 914: 913: 906: 900: 899: 889: 865: 742:collision attack 668:CA/Browser Forum 456:CA/Browser Forum 449: 441: 437: 433: 428: 423: 419: 415: 411: 247: 246: 81:CA/Browser Forum 3225: 3224: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3169: 3117: 3075: 3059: 3036:Vulnerabilities 3031: 3005: 2908:Implementations 2902: 2881: 2852: 2757: 2678: 2673: 2631: 2613: 2548: 2511: 2488: 2480: 2475: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2414: 2410: 2401: 2399: 2389: 2385: 2376: 2374: 2361: 2357: 2348: 2346: 2339: 2335: 2326: 2324: 2314: 2310: 2301: 2299: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2277: 2275: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2238: 2234: 2225: 2223: 2212: 2208: 2199: 2197: 2186: 2182: 2172: 2170: 2160: 2156: 2147: 2145: 2134: 2130: 2121: 2119: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2095: 2093: 2084: 2083: 2079: 2069: 2067: 2058: 2057: 2053: 2043: 2041: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2018: 2016: 2012: 2005: 1999: 1995: 1986: 1984: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1961: 1959: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1893: 1889: 1881: 1877: 1869: 1865: 1857: 1853: 1845: 1838: 1830: 1826: 1612: 1608: 1599: 1597: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1545: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1519: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1493:"Network World" 1491: 1490: 1486: 1477: 1475: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1431: 1424: 1416: 1412: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1381: 1379: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1352: 1350: 1346: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1285:. 13 May 2015. 1277: 1276: 1272: 1263: 1261: 1252: 1251: 1247: 1238: 1236: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1213: 1211: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1184: 1182: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1160: 1158: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1136: 1134: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1107: 1105: 1101: 1097:. Trend Micro. 1094: 1088: 1084: 1075: 1073: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1050: 1048: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1003: 993: 989: 979: 977: 972: 971: 967: 958: 956: 951:. Mozilla.org. 947: 946: 942: 933: 931: 921: 917: 908: 907: 903: 866: 862: 858: 809: 789: 761: 700: 694: 685: 644: 596: 590: 583: 533: 500: 486:that contain a 469: 447: 439: 435: 431: 426: 421: 417: 413: 409: 397: 366: 189:Mozilla Firefox 162: 60: 17: 12: 11: 5: 3223: 3213: 3212: 3207: 3202: 3200:Key management 3197: 3192: 3175: 3174: 3171: 3170: 3168: 3167: 3162: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3141: 3136: 3131: 3125: 3123: 3122:Implementation 3119: 3118: 3116: 3115: 3109: 3104: 3099: 3094: 3089: 3083: 3081: 3077: 3076: 3074: 3073: 3067: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3058: 3057: 3052: 3046: 3044: 3037: 3033: 3032: 3030: 3029: 3024: 3019: 3013: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2993: 2988: 2983: 2978: 2973: 2968: 2963: 2958: 2953: 2948: 2943: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2923: 2918: 2912: 2910: 2904: 2903: 2901: 2900: 2895: 2889: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2880: 2879: 2873: 2867: 2860: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2840: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2818: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2805: 2799: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2772: 2765: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2756: 2755: 2750: 2745: 2740: 2734: 2728: 2723: 2717: 2711: 2705: 2699: 2693: 2686: 2684: 2680: 2679: 2672: 2671: 2664: 2657: 2649: 2643: 2642: 2630: 2629:External links 2627: 2626: 2625: 2611: 2588: 2560: 2546: 2523: 2509: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2473: 2464:casecurity.org 2451: 2433: 2408: 2383: 2366:(2015-03-23). 2355: 2333: 2308: 2284: 2270:. 2012-02-07. 2268:The H Security 2255: 2232: 2206: 2180: 2154: 2128: 2103: 2077: 2051: 2025: 1993: 1968: 1943: 1921: 1899: 1897:, p. 1-2. 1887: 1885:, p. 542. 1875: 1863: 1851: 1836: 1824: 1606: 1581: 1550: 1543: 1524: 1517: 1498: 1484: 1459: 1437: 1410: 1388: 1359: 1328: 1310: 1292: 1270: 1245: 1220: 1191: 1167: 1143: 1114: 1082: 1057: 1032: 987: 965: 940: 929:www.jscape.com 915: 901: 859: 857: 854: 853: 852: 846: 840: 835: 833:Chain of trust 830: 825: 820: 815: 808: 805: 788: 785: 760: 757: 693: 690: 684: 681: 680: 679: 665: 651: 643: 640: 592:Main article: 589: 586: 581: 562: 561: 558: 532: 529: 499: 496: 468: 465: 461:Microsoft Live 414:administrator@ 396: 393: 365: 362: 359: 358: 355: 352: 346: 342: 341: 338: 335: 329: 325: 324: 321: 318: 313: 309: 308: 305: 302: 297: 293: 292: 289: 286: 281: 277: 276: 273: 270: 265: 261: 260: 257: 254: 251: 161: 158: 59: 56: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3222: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3198: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3185: 3166: 3163: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3126: 3124: 3120: 3113: 3110: 3108: 3105: 3103: 3100: 3098: 3095: 3093: 3090: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3082: 3078: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3066: 3062: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3034: 3028: 3025: 3023: 3020: 3018: 3015: 3014: 3012: 3008: 3002: 2999: 2997: 2994: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2984: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2974: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2964: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2944: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2917: 2916:Bouncy Castle 2914: 2913: 2911: 2909: 2905: 2899: 2896: 2894: 2891: 2890: 2888: 2884: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2859: 2855: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2809: 2808:OCSP stapling 2806: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2754: 2751: 2749: 2746: 2744: 2743:OCSP stapling 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2703: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2670: 2665: 2663: 2658: 2656: 2651: 2650: 2647: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2608: 2603: 2598: 2594: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2543: 2538: 2533: 2529: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2510:9781450356190 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2487: 2482: 2481: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2455: 2447: 2443: 2437: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2419: 2412: 2398: 2394: 2387: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2364:Langley, Adam 2359: 2344: 2337: 2323: 2319: 2312: 2298: 2294: 2288: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2259: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2236: 2221: 2217: 2210: 2195: 2191: 2184: 2169: 2165: 2158: 2143: 2139: 2132: 2117: 2113: 2107: 2091: 2087: 2081: 2065: 2061: 2055: 2039: 2035: 2029: 2011: 2004: 1997: 1982: 1978: 1972: 1957: 1953: 1947: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1925: 1917: 1913: 1912:Network World 1909: 1903: 1896: 1891: 1884: 1879: 1873:, p. 10. 1872: 1867: 1860: 1855: 1848: 1843: 1841: 1833: 1828: 1821: 1815: 1812: 1809:. BCP 6. 1808: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1778: 1774: 1768: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1729: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1696: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1653: 1652:Experimental. 1648: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1610: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1567: 1560: 1554: 1546: 1544:9781931491594 1540: 1536: 1535: 1528: 1520: 1518:9783540222170 1514: 1510: 1509: 1502: 1494: 1488: 1473: 1469: 1463: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1441: 1430: 1423: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1392: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1345: 1338: 1332: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1306: 1302: 1296: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1274: 1259: 1255: 1249: 1234: 1230: 1224: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1181: 1177: 1171: 1157: 1156:Apple Support 1153: 1147: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1118: 1100: 1093: 1086: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1046: 1042: 1036: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1002: 998: 991: 975: 969: 954: 950: 944: 930: 926: 919: 911: 905: 897: 893: 888: 883: 879: 875: 871: 864: 860: 850: 847: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 819: 816: 814: 811: 810: 804: 802: 798: 793: 784: 782: 777: 775: 771: 767: 756: 754: 750: 745: 743: 738: 735:In 2012, the 733: 729: 727: 723: 718: 715: 712: 707: 703: 699: 692:CA compromise 689: 677: 673: 669: 666: 663: 659: 655: 652: 649: 646: 645: 639: 637: 633: 629: 624: 622: 618: 614: 608: 606: 602: 595: 585: 577: 575: 571: 569: 559: 556: 555: 554: 551: 547: 543: 539: 528: 525: 519: 515: 511: 508: 504: 495: 492: 489: 485: 478: 473: 464: 462: 457: 451: 443: 429: 407: 401: 392: 390: 386: 382: 377: 375: 371: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 343: 339: 336: 333: 330: 327: 326: 322: 319: 317: 314: 311: 310: 306: 303: 301: 298: 295: 294: 290: 287: 285: 282: 279: 278: 274: 271: 269: 268:Let's Encrypt 266: 263: 262: 259:Market Share 258: 255: 252: 249: 248: 245: 243: 238: 236: 232: 227: 224: 221:According to 219: 217: 213: 209: 208:Let's Encrypt 205: 200: 198: 194: 190: 185: 183: 179: 175: 171: 166: 157: 154: 150: 145: 141: 139: 135: 130: 128: 124: 119: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 100:Let's Encrypt 96: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 72: 70: 65: 55: 53: 48: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 2876:Secure Shell 2774: 2638: 2592: 2565: 2527: 2492: 2463: 2454: 2446:linkedin.com 2445: 2436: 2421: 2411: 2400:. Retrieved 2396: 2386: 2375:. Retrieved 2371: 2358: 2347:. Retrieved 2345:. ThreatPost 2336: 2325:. Retrieved 2322:Ars Technica 2321: 2311: 2300:. Retrieved 2296: 2287: 2276:. Retrieved 2267: 2258: 2246:The Register 2245: 2235: 2224:. Retrieved 2209: 2198:. Retrieved 2183: 2171:. Retrieved 2167: 2157: 2146:. Retrieved 2131: 2120:. Retrieved 2112:"CA-2001-04" 2106: 2094:. Retrieved 2080: 2068:. Retrieved 2054: 2042:. Retrieved 2028: 2017:. Retrieved 2008:. DigiCert. 1996: 1985:. Retrieved 1971: 1960:. Retrieved 1946: 1938:the original 1934:Dark Reading 1933: 1924: 1916:the original 1911: 1902: 1890: 1878: 1866: 1861:, p. 3. 1854: 1834:, p. 1. 1827: 1783: 1736: 1701: 1658: 1651: 1616: 1609: 1598:. Retrieved 1584: 1573:. Retrieved 1553: 1533: 1527: 1507: 1501: 1487: 1476:. Retrieved 1462: 1449: 1440: 1420: 1413: 1400: 1391: 1380:. Retrieved 1371: 1362: 1351:. Retrieved 1331: 1322: 1313: 1304: 1295: 1282: 1273: 1262:. Retrieved 1248: 1237:. Retrieved 1223: 1212:. Retrieved 1203: 1194: 1183:. Retrieved 1179: 1170: 1159:. Retrieved 1155: 1146: 1135:. Retrieved 1126: 1117: 1106:. Retrieved 1085: 1074:. Retrieved 1068:. webtrust. 1060: 1049:. Retrieved 1035: 1023:. Retrieved 1007: 990: 980:February 17, 978:. Retrieved 968: 957:. Retrieved 943: 932:. Retrieved 928: 918: 904: 880:(16): 2009. 877: 873: 863: 828:Web of trust 818:Contact page 794: 790: 781:key ceremony 778: 762: 746: 734: 730: 719: 716: 708: 704: 701: 686: 672:Comodo Group 658:Comodo Group 628:Web browsers 625: 620: 617:availability 612: 609: 597: 578: 567: 563: 534: 520: 516: 512: 501: 493: 482:A CA issues 481: 452: 444: 402: 398: 378: 367: 239: 228: 220: 201: 186: 167: 163: 146: 142: 131: 120: 97: 93:intermediate 92: 88: 73: 61: 49: 32: 28: 24: 21:cryptography 18: 3022:Convergence 2676:TLS and SSL 2478:Works cited 2062:. Mozilla. 1323:w3techs.com 1025:20 December 874:Electronics 759:Key storage 507:HTTP Secure 427:postmaster@ 422:hostmaster@ 374:domain name 3184:Categories 3149:Heartbleed 2402:2023-10-13 2377:2023-09-27 2349:2023-09-27 2327:2023-10-13 2302:2023-10-13 2278:2012-03-14 2226:2011-09-01 2200:2011-09-01 2173:5 December 2148:2011-11-09 2122:2014-06-11 2019:2013-04-23 1987:2013-04-23 1962:2014-08-23 1600:2013-11-03 1575:2014-08-28 1478:2015-02-12 1382:2017-07-06 1353:2015-03-20 1264:2015-06-07 1239:2014-11-20 1214:2017-06-09 1185:2020-08-24 1161:2020-08-24 1137:2017-03-18 1108:2014-06-11 1076:2013-03-02 1066:"webtrust" 1051:2022-03-19 959:2014-06-11 934:2021-09-05 856:References 696:See also: 570:initiative 488:public key 418:webmaster@ 284:GlobalSign 112:Cloudflare 47:standard. 3144:goto fail 2956:MatrixSSL 2921:BoringSSL 2692:(TLS/SSL) 2621:211268930 2088:. Apple. 1807:2070-1721 1760:2070-1721 1721:2070-1721 1682:2070-1721 1640:2070-1721 896:2079-9292 843:DigiNotar 728:in Iran. 722:DigiNotar 621:fail-soft 613:fail-hard 300:IdenTrust 160:Providers 104:IBM Cloud 85:resellers 3080:Protocol 3010:Notaries 2986:SChannel 2961:mbed TLS 2951:LibreSSL 2936:cryptlib 2866:(DNSSEC) 2857:See also 2519:53223350 2468:Archived 2428:Archived 2272:Archived 2250:Archived 2220:Archived 2194:Archived 2142:Archived 2116:Archived 2096:14 April 2090:Archived 2070:14 April 2064:Archived 2044:14 April 2038:Archived 2010:Archived 1981:Archived 1956:Archived 1791:(IETF). 1744:(IETF). 1666:(IETF). 1624:(IETF). 1594:Archived 1566:Archived 1472:Archived 1454:Archived 1429:Archived 1405:Archived 1376:Archived 1344:Archived 1287:Archived 1258:Archived 1233:Archived 1208:Archived 1131:Archived 1099:Archived 1070:Archived 1045:Archived 1016:Archived 974:"EMV CA" 953:Archived 807:See also 711:VeriSign 619:) or to 574:phishing 542:Notaries 538:Kerberos 531:Security 440:support@ 332:DigiCert 231:Netcraft 223:Netcraft 178:WebTrust 58:Overview 3001:wolfSSL 2996:stunnel 2981:s2n-tls 2971:OpenSSL 2886:History 2872:(IPsec) 2556:3926509 1450:tivi.fi 1254:"About" 1012:SIGCOMM 774:offline 498:Example 349:GoDaddy 77:Mozilla 3159:POODLE 3112:POODLE 3107:Logjam 3092:BREACH 3064:Cipher 3043:Theory 2991:SSLeay 2976:Rustls 2941:GnuTLS 2804:(OCSP) 2771:(ACME) 2739:(HPKP) 2733:(HSTS) 2716:(DANE) 2710:(ALPN) 2698:(DTLS) 2619:  2609:  2554:  2544:  2517:  2507:  1805:  1758:  1719:  1680:  1638:  1541:  1515:  894:  849:Comodo 753:Chrome 410:admin@ 307:12.4% 291:14.0% 275:56.3% 253:Issuer 149:S/MIME 114:, and 3139:FREAK 3102:DROWN 3097:CRIME 3087:BEAST 2931:BSAFE 2926:Botan 2878:(SSH) 2839:(PKI) 2798:(CRL) 2726:HTTPS 2722:(CAA) 2704:(SNI) 2617:S2CID 2552:S2CID 2515:S2CID 2489:(PDF) 2423:ZDNet 2168:eWeek 2013:(PDF) 2006:(PDF) 1569:(PDF) 1562:(PDF) 1432:(PDF) 1425:(PDF) 1347:(PDF) 1340:(PDF) 1102:(PDF) 1095:(PDF) 1019:(PDF) 1004:(PDF) 764:on a 737:Flame 524:X.509 438:, or 436:info@ 432:root@ 406:WHOIS 357:4.4% 351:Group 340:5.3% 334:Group 323:7.3% 304:11.6% 288:13.1% 272:52.5% 256:Usage 242:Alexa 193:macOS 87:. A 52:HTTPS 41:X.509 2946:JSSE 2823:(EV) 2817:(DV) 2777:(CA) 2607:ISBN 2584:9325 2542:ISBN 2505:ISBN 2175:2021 2098:2017 2072:2017 2046:2017 1820:1930 1814:6996 1803:ISSN 1777:4861 1775:and 1773:3971 1767:6980 1756:ISSN 1728:6979 1717:ISSN 1695:1930 1689:6963 1678:ISSN 1647:6962 1636:ISSN 1539:ISBN 1513:ISBN 1027:2013 982:2019 892:ISSN 674:CEO 660:CEO 389:Edge 354:4.2% 337:5.0% 320:6.8% 250:Rank 182:ETSI 89:root 23:, a 2966:NSS 2597:doi 2581:RFC 2571:doi 2532:doi 2497:doi 1811:RFC 1793:doi 1764:RFC 1746:doi 1725:RFC 1707:doi 1686:RFC 1668:doi 1644:RFC 1626:doi 882:doi 434:, 424:or 153:key 138:POS 134:EMV 45:EMV 43:or 27:or 19:In 3186:: 2637:, 2615:. 2605:. 2595:. 2579:. 2569:. 2550:. 2540:. 2513:. 2503:. 2491:. 2462:. 2444:. 2426:. 2420:. 2395:. 2370:. 2320:. 2295:. 2266:. 2248:. 2244:. 2166:. 2140:. 1979:. 1954:. 1932:. 1910:. 1839:^ 1801:. 1787:. 1762:. 1754:. 1740:. 1723:. 1715:. 1684:. 1676:. 1662:. 1642:. 1634:. 1620:. 1592:. 1564:. 1470:. 1452:. 1448:. 1403:. 1399:. 1374:. 1370:. 1342:. 1321:. 1303:. 1281:. 1206:. 1202:. 1178:. 1154:. 1129:. 1125:. 1043:. 1014:. 1010:. 1006:. 927:. 890:. 878:10 876:. 872:. 580:CA 576:. 420:, 416:, 412:, 118:. 110:, 106:, 33:CA 2668:e 2661:t 2654:v 2623:. 2599:: 2586:. 2573:: 2558:. 2534:: 2521:. 2499:: 2405:. 2380:. 2352:. 2330:. 2305:. 2281:. 2229:. 2203:. 2177:. 2151:. 2125:. 2100:. 2074:. 2048:. 2022:. 1990:. 1965:. 1816:. 1795:: 1769:. 1748:: 1730:. 1709:: 1691:. 1670:: 1649:. 1628:: 1603:. 1578:. 1547:. 1521:. 1481:. 1385:. 1356:. 1325:. 1307:. 1267:. 1242:. 1217:. 1188:. 1164:. 1140:. 1111:. 1079:. 1054:. 1029:. 984:. 962:. 937:. 912:. 898:. 884:: 582:2 345:6 328:5 312:4 296:3 280:2 264:1 31:(

Index

cryptography
digital certificates
X.509
EMV
HTTPS
secure connections
man-in-the-middle attack
Mozilla
CA/Browser Forum
resellers
Let's Encrypt
IBM Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Cloudflare
Google Cloud Platform
public key infrastructure
self-signed certificates
EMV
POS
S/MIME
key
TLS/SSL server certificates
barriers to entry
WebTrust
ETSI
Mozilla Firefox
macOS
Microsoft Windows
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Let's Encrypt

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑