110:
Depending on how each country decides to organize his constitutional reviews, it can be attributed to a different organ. In some countries, part of the review can be attribution of a political organ. For instance, In Brazil, the declaration of unconstitutionality in a concrete case by the
85:. The term "constitutional review" is usually characterized as a Civil Law concept, but some of the ideas behind it come from Common Law countries with written constitutions. For instance, the United States was the first country to adopt judicial review based directly on its
95:), even though to this day the functions of the Constitutional Court and of the Court of the Last Resort are separated at neither Federal nor State level in the United States.
39:. It is supposed to be a system of preventing violation of the rights granted by the constitution, assuring its efficacy, their stability and preservation.
246:
139:. The reason for this ban is that constitutional review would put the judiciary in a legislative position, which conflicts with the idea of the
155:
Constitution does explicitly allow the review of laws by treaties that contain provisions binding all members. Consequently, treaties like the
180:
148:
61:
exist in most countries, represent the supreme norm of the juridical order, and are on the top of the pyramid of norms. Also called
254:
152:
156:
147:
has ruled that this ban on constitutional review also extents to rulings on the creation of laws, rulings based on the
327:
136:
168:
144:
132:
195:
205:
143:. The Dutch parliament is responsible for the adherence of the laws it passes to the Constitution. The
226:
349:
47:
185:
284:
112:
140:
8:
91:
58:
323:
32:
190:
78:
51:
42:
There are very specific cases in which the constitutional review differs from
343:
135:
explicitly forbids courts to rule on the constitutionality of laws passed by
86:
200:
115:
can be suggested to senate to give to this declaration global effects.
43:
126:
263:
99:
28:
159:
in practice have taken a constitutional review-like effect.
36:
322:(in Dutch). Deventer: Wolters Kluwer. pp. 226–230.
285:"Study on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice"
98:
The judicial control of constitutionality applies to
317:
123:Countries can put a ban on constitutional review.
244:
341:
118:
127:Ban on constitutional review in the Netherlands
162:
81:to updating them than other laws, which are
181:Constitutional Review Commission (Tanzania)
320:Beginselen van het Nederlandse Staatsrecht
149:Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands
247:"Constitutional Review in Global Context"
255:Journal of Legislation and Public Policy
308:Paulo e Alexandrino (2009), pp. 302-303
290:. Council of Europe - Venice Commission
342:
224:
277:
238:
218:
157:European Convention on Human Rights
151:and general principles of law. The
13:
105:
14:
361:
169:Constitutional review in Germany
145:Supreme Court of the Netherlands
133:Constitution of the Netherlands
77:, they have more difficult and
318:Belinfante; Reede, de (2020).
311:
302:
1:
211:
196:List of constitutional courts
119:Bans on constitutional review
27:, is the evaluation, in some
206:Rule According to Higher Law
7:
174:
113:Supreme Federal Court (STF)
10:
366:
245:Ferejohn, John E. (2002).
228:The Constitutional Review
163:In specific jurisdictions
21:constitutionality review
186:Judicial interpretation
25:constitutional control
225:Mavcic, Arne (2001).
17:Constitutional review
141:separation of powers
59:rigid constitutions
92:Marbury v. Madison
83:sub-constitutional
79:formal procedures
33:constitutionality
357:
334:
333:
315:
309:
306:
300:
299:
297:
295:
289:
281:
275:
274:
272:
270:
251:
242:
236:
235:
233:
222:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
350:Judicial review
340:
339:
338:
337:
330:
316:
312:
307:
303:
293:
291:
287:
283:
282:
278:
268:
266:
249:
243:
239:
231:
223:
219:
214:
191:Judicial review
177:
165:
129:
121:
108:
106:Control systems
71:law of the laws
63:fundamental law
52:judicial review
12:
11:
5:
363:
353:
352:
336:
335:
328:
310:
301:
276:
237:
216:
215:
213:
210:
209:
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
176:
173:
172:
171:
164:
161:
128:
125:
120:
117:
107:
104:
100:normative acts
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
351:
348:
347:
345:
331:
329:9789013146509
325:
321:
314:
305:
286:
280:
265:
261:
257:
256:
248:
241:
230:
229:
221:
217:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
178:
170:
167:
166:
160:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
124:
116:
114:
103:
101:
96:
94:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
53:
49:
45:
40:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
18:
319:
313:
304:
292:. Retrieved
279:
267:. Retrieved
259:
253:
240:
227:
220:
130:
122:
109:
97:
90:
87:constitution
82:
74:
70:
66:
62:
57:Written and
56:
54:in general.
41:
24:
20:
16:
15:
269:19 December
201:Rule of law
67:supreme law
50:as well as
212:References
137:parliament
44:common law
102:as well.
75:basic law
48:civil law
31:, of the
29:countries
344:Category
175:See also
264:NYU Law
35:of the
326:
294:6 July
153:monist
288:(PDF)
262:(1).
250:(PDF)
232:(PDF)
89:(see
19:, or
324:ISBN
296:2012
271:2022
131:The
37:laws
46:to
23:or
346::
258:.
252:.
73:,
69:,
65:,
332:.
298:.
273:.
260:6
234:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.