38:
895:
284:
248:. Such arguments can be refuted by showing that the disjunctive premise — the "horns of the dilemma" — does not in fact hold, because it presents a false dichotomy. You are asked to accept "A or B", but counter by showing that is not all. Successfully undermining that premise is called "escaping through the horns of the dilemma".
374:
155:
A dilemma is often phrased as "you must accept either A, or B", where A and B are propositions each leading to some further conclusion. In the case where this is true, it can be called a "dichotomy", but when it is not true, the dilemma constitutes a
594:, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric Vol. 28, No. 4 (Autumn 2010), pp. 363–383, at p. 364. Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the International Society for the History of Rhetoric. DOI: 10.1525/rh.2010.28.4.363
867:, Oxford University Press, p. 15, 72. See also Michael Bohlander, ‘Of Shipwrecked Sailors, Unborn Children, Conjoined Twins and Hijacked Airplanes—Taking Human Life and the Defence of Necessity’ (2006) 70 The Journal of Criminal Law 147.
366:, whether a government official could intentionally kill innocent civilians by shooting down a hijacked airplane that would otherwise have crashed into a football stadium, killing tens of thousands.
331:, as did casuistry itself. Another approach, with legal roots, is to lay emphasis on particular features present in a given case: in other words, the exact framing of the dilemma.
877:
864:
343:, to describe a situation where a legal subject is confronted with two or more legal norms that the legal subject cannot simultaneously comply with.
850:
Leibniz, Gottfried
Wilhelm, "Inaugural Dissertation on Perplexing Cases in the Law" in Alberto Artosi, Bernardo Pieri, and Giovanni Sartor (eds.),
309:
appear to be inconsistent, an actor confronts a dilemma in terms of which principle to follow. This kind of moral case study is attributed to
264:
philosopher whose works survive in fragmentary form, making the origins of the technique in philosophy imponderable. It was established with
45:
in a dilemma: If he climbs to escape the guard dog he will face the man's wrath, but if he drops to avoid the man, the dog will attack him.
346:
Examples include contradictory contracts where one clause directly negates another clause, or conflicts between fundamental (e.g.
61:
82:
offering two possibilities, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable. The possibilities are termed the
324:
676:
822:
768:
703:
622:
575:
521:
496:
471:
446:
378:
358:(Perplexing Cases) is an early study of contradictory legal conditions. In domestic law, it has been argued that the
429:
125:. He also concluded that Valla had reintroduced to the Latin West a type of argument that had fallen into disuse.
795:
649:
377:. It was faced with the question whether, in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, it is a state's right to
370:
614:
Logic and Its
Applications: 7th Indian Conference, ICLA 2017, Kanpur, India, January 5-7, 2017, Proceedings
359:
925:
240:, which are in themselves valid rather than fallacious. They each have three premises, and include the
899:
351:
362:
confronted a legal dilemma when determining, in connection with proceedings relating to the German
31:
17:
839:
Valentin
Jeutner: Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma
544:
434:
42:
567:
54:
785:
666:
639:
612:
438:
812:
758:
693:
363:
90:
usage, but distinguishing the dilemma from other kinds of predicament as a matter of usage.
241:
201:
8:
245:
229:
122:
599:
538:
340:
920:
595:
560:
347:
237:
103:
930:
915:
818:
791:
764:
720:
699:
672:
645:
618:
571:
517:
492:
467:
442:
339:
In law, Valentin
Jeutner has argued that the term "legal dilemma" could be used as a
287:
257:
197:
132:
did not immediately take hold, preference being given to the established Latin term
424:
306:
300:
265:
217:
157:
145:
79:
878:
Irresolvable Norm
Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma
865:
Irresolvable Norm
Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma
739:
382:
177:
164:. Traditional usage distinguished the dilemma as a "horned syllogism" from the
110:
in the 15th century, in later versions of his logic text traditionally called
37:
909:
107:
75:
400:
269:
209:
121:. Nuchelmans argued that his probable source was a logic text of c.1433 of
514:
Dilemmatic arguments : towards a history of their logic and rhetoric
489:
Dilemmatic arguments : towards a history of their logic and rhetoric
464:
Dilemmatic arguments : towards a history of their logic and rhetoric
315:
261:
144:
applied to the upsetting of dilemmatic reasoning. With the support of
320:
273:
129:
67:
114:. Valla claimed that it was the appropriate Latin equivalent of the
87:
394:
27:
Problem requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives
165:
161:
290:
of sounding (or not sounding) an alarm for a possible earthquake
283:
894:
328:
310:
137:
115:
323:, an approach to abstract ranking of principles introduced by
294:
277:
276:
in dilemma form, but that may have been to conform with what
841:, 28 (2017) European Journal of International Law 1415-1428.
200:. Its isolation as textbook material has been attributed to
327:
in the 16th century became tainted with the accusation of
811:
Jonsen, Albert R.; Toulmin, Stephen
Edelston (1988).
757:
Jonsen, Albert R.; Toulmin, Stephen
Edelston (1988).
369:
In international law, it has been suggested that the
814:
The Abuse of
Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
760:
The Abuse of
Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning
405:
Pages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
152:was widely applied by the end of the 16th century.
559:
907:
852:Leibniz: Logico-Philosophical Puzzles in the Law
746:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
727:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
817:. University of California Press. p. 54.
763:. University of California Press. p. 75.
381:or international law's general prohibition of
810:
756:
256:Dilemmatic reasoning has been attributed to
790:. Princeton University Press. p. 154.
610:
397: – Difficult choice from three options
698:. Cambridge University Press. p. 44.
511:
486:
461:
295:Moral dilemmas along with ethical dilemmas
543:. Moore, Wilstach & Baldwin. p.
691:
536:
282:
36:
744:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
725:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
611:Ghosh, Sujata; Prasad, Sanjiva (2016).
566:. University of Toronto Press. p.
557:
540:The Logic of Sir William Hamilton, Bart
373:confronted a legal dilemma in its 1996
191:
14:
908:
783:
737:
718:
664:
637:
592:Rhetorical use of dilemmatic arguments
423:
880:, Oxford University Press, p. 10-11.
268:(died c. 284 BCE). The paradoxes of
196:The dilemma is sometimes used as a
24:
641:Introduction to Mathematical Logic
184:, translating from the Latin term
176:in English has been attributed to
25:
942:
887:
516:. North-Holland. pp. 102–6.
893:
617:. Springer. p. 177 note 5.
375:Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion
319:. In the Christian tradition of
251:
870:
857:
844:
831:
804:
777:
750:
731:
712:
685:
658:
172:. The original use of the word
644:. Princeton University Press.
631:
604:
584:
551:
537:Hamilton, Sir William (1863).
530:
505:
480:
455:
430:Garner’s Modern American Usage
417:
371:International Court of Justice
168:that attracted the Latin name
93:
13:
1:
668:A Practical Study of Argument
491:. North-Holland. p. 94.
466:. North-Holland. p. 89.
410:
558:Erasmus, Desiderius (2003).
512:Nuchelmans, Gabriel (1991).
487:Nuchelmans, Gabriel (1991).
462:Nuchelmans, Gabriel (1991).
7:
784:Peters, Francis E. (2003).
695:Melissus and Eleatic Monism
692:Harriman, Benjamin (2018).
388:
385:that should take priority.
360:German Constitutional Court
354:1666 doctoral dissertation
223:
216:as any argument relying on
10:
947:
876:Jeutner, Valentin (2017),
863:Jeutner, Valentin (2017),
590:Lucia Calboli Montefusco,
298:
60:
29:
787:The words and will of God
334:
280:said about Zeno's style.
236:is applied to a group of
600:10.1525/rh.2010.28.4.363
562:Paraphrase on Luke 11-24
32:Dilemma (disambiguation)
638:Church, Alonzo (1996).
435:Oxford University Press
403: – English proverb
43:William Ewart Gladstone
837:Birkenkötter, Hannah,
719:Sedley, David (2018).
665:Govier, Trudy (2009).
291:
46:
738:Palmer, John (2017).
364:Aviation Security Act
313:, in book III of his
286:
212:gave a definition of
160:, which is a logical
40:
902:at Wikimedia Commons
671:. Cengage Learning.
356:De casibus perplexis
242:constructive dilemma
202:Hermogenes of Tarsus
192:Dilemmatic arguments
186:cornuta interrogatio
30:For other uses, see
325:Bartolomé de Medina
305:In cases where two
246:destructive dilemma
230:propositional logic
214:dilemmatic argument
123:George of Trebizond
292:
238:rules of inference
104:Gabriel Nuchelmans
86:of the dilemma, a
47:
926:Concepts in logic
898:Media related to
721:"Diodorus Cronus"
288:Contingency table
272:were reported by
258:Melissus of Samos
198:rhetorical device
180:in his 1548 book
102:is attributed by
16:(Redirected from
938:
897:
881:
874:
868:
861:
855:
854:(Springer 2013).
848:
842:
835:
829:
828:
808:
802:
801:
781:
775:
774:
754:
748:
747:
735:
729:
728:
716:
710:
709:
689:
683:
682:
662:
656:
655:
635:
629:
628:
608:
602:
588:
582:
581:
565:
555:
549:
548:
534:
528:
527:
509:
503:
502:
484:
478:
477:
459:
453:
452:
421:
406:
307:moral principles
71:
64:
41:Cartoon showing
21:
946:
945:
941:
940:
939:
937:
936:
935:
906:
905:
890:
885:
884:
875:
871:
862:
858:
849:
845:
836:
832:
825:
809:
805:
798:
782:
778:
771:
755:
751:
736:
732:
717:
713:
706:
690:
686:
679:
663:
659:
652:
636:
632:
625:
609:
605:
589:
585:
578:
556:
552:
535:
531:
524:
510:
506:
499:
485:
481:
474:
460:
456:
449:
422:
418:
413:
404:
391:
383:nuclear weapons
350:) legal norms.
337:
303:
301:ethical dilemma
297:
266:Diodorus Cronus
254:
226:
218:excluded middle
194:
158:false dichotomy
146:Juan Luis Vives
96:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
944:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
904:
903:
889:
888:External links
886:
883:
882:
869:
856:
843:
830:
823:
803:
796:
776:
769:
749:
740:"Zeno of Elea"
730:
711:
704:
684:
678:978-0495603405
677:
657:
650:
630:
623:
603:
583:
576:
550:
529:
522:
504:
497:
479:
472:
454:
447:
415:
414:
412:
409:
408:
407:
398:
390:
387:
348:constitutional
336:
333:
299:Main article:
296:
293:
253:
250:
225:
222:
193:
190:
178:Nicholas Udall
95:
92:
74: 'double
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
943:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
913:
911:
901:
896:
892:
891:
879:
873:
866:
860:
853:
847:
840:
834:
826:
824:9780520060630
820:
816:
815:
807:
799:
793:
789:
788:
780:
772:
770:9780520060630
766:
762:
761:
753:
745:
741:
734:
726:
722:
715:
707:
705:9781108416337
701:
697:
696:
688:
680:
674:
670:
669:
661:
653:
647:
643:
642:
634:
626:
624:9783662540695
620:
616:
615:
607:
601:
597:
593:
587:
579:
577:9780802036537
573:
569:
564:
563:
554:
546:
542:
541:
533:
525:
523:0-444-85730-3
519:
515:
508:
500:
498:0-444-85730-3
494:
490:
483:
475:
473:0-444-85730-3
469:
465:
458:
450:
448:9780199888771
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
426:
425:Garner, Bryan
420:
416:
402:
399:
396:
393:
392:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
342:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
312:
308:
302:
289:
285:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
252:In philosophy
249:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
189:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
153:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
124:
120:
117:
113:
109:
108:Lorenzo Valla
105:
101:
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
70:
63:
59:
56:
55:Ancient Greek
52:
44:
39:
33:
19:
872:
859:
851:
846:
838:
833:
813:
806:
786:
779:
759:
752:
743:
733:
724:
714:
694:
687:
667:
660:
640:
633:
613:
606:
591:
586:
561:
553:
539:
532:
513:
507:
488:
482:
463:
457:
428:
419:
401:At Dulcarnon
379:self-defence
368:
355:
345:
338:
314:
304:
270:Zeno of Elea
255:
233:
227:
213:
210:C. S. Peirce
206:On Invention
205:
204:in his work
195:
185:
181:
173:
169:
154:
149:
141:
133:
127:
118:
111:
99:
97:
83:
68:
65:
58:
50:
48:
341:term-of-art
316:De Officiis
262:Presocratic
182:Paraphrases
148:, however,
94:Terminology
76:proposition
910:Categories
797:0691114617
651:0691029067
437:. p.
411:References
136:, used by
119:dilemmaton
112:Dialectica
53:(from
921:Arguments
352:Leibniz's
321:casuistry
274:Aristotle
142:conversio
134:complexio
130:neologism
98:The term
931:Rhetoric
916:Dilemmas
900:Dilemmas
427:(2009).
395:Trilemma
389:See also
224:In logic
170:cornutus
128:Valla's
78:') is a
18:Dilemmas
234:dilemma
166:sophism
162:fallacy
150:dilemma
140:, with
100:dilemma
88:clichéd
80:problem
69:dílēmma
62:δίλημμα
51:dilemma
821:
794:
767:
702:
675:
648:
621:
598:
574:
520:
495:
470:
445:
335:In law
329:laxism
311:Cicero
138:Cicero
596:JSTOR
278:Plato
174:horns
116:Greek
84:horns
57:
819:ISBN
792:ISBN
765:ISBN
700:ISBN
673:ISBN
646:ISBN
619:ISBN
572:ISBN
518:ISBN
493:ISBN
468:ISBN
443:ISBN
260:, a
244:and
568:158
545:185
439:257
228:In
106:to
912::
742:.
723:.
570:.
441:.
433:.
232:,
220:.
208:.
188:.
49:A
827:.
800:.
773:.
708:.
681:.
654:.
627:.
580:.
547:.
526:.
501:.
476:.
451:.
72:)
66:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.