456:, as peer review is not limited to only fixing spelling mistakes, but rather allows people with different worldviews to oversee a work, giving the writer greater insight as to the purpose of the work. Peer review can also point out sentence structure errors to the writer, potentially causing the draft to be entirely rewritten. Professional writers may use peer review while drafting for the previously stated reasons, although it is a time-consuming process.
73:
293:
32:
226:
175:
432:
grammar mistakes the computer points out and miss mistakes that affect the entirety of the work (global mistakes), in comparison to when writers create physical, handwritten drafts, as in physical writing they have to constantly reread or revisit their work, making more corrections based on ideas.
361:
When drafting, a writer is most likely not scared of failure. Draft after draft, a writer can experiment on their work without being penalized for it. The more a writer drafts, the more they see as to what works and doesn't work for their writing. In a bad draft, the writer can reflect on the
439:
them to make physical revisions. By typing on a computer, it allows the writer to fix the minor mistakes the word processor points out and revise the printed copy, while also allowing the writer to make global revisions. Thanks to the computer, the process of drafting, which includes creating
348:
characterizes a draft less as a first attempt at a predetermined final point and more as an attempt at exploring and where a final version might end up. As he puts it, "riting is a way to end up thinking something you couldn’t have started out thinking." According to Elbow, the best way to
431:
However, drafting on a computer does not signify better drafts. Before word processing, when writers created a new draft, it was an investment of their time dedicated to completely rewriting the entirety of their work. When using word processors, it causes a writer to only correct minor
349:
accomplish this is a series of drafts which come together to produce an emerging “center of gravity” that then translates into the main focus on the work—a holistic process, in other words, rather than the linear process envisioned by Strunk and White and early
324:
generate trial versions of the text they're developing. At the phrasal level, these versions may last less than a second, as writers compose and then delete trial sentences; as fully developed attempts that have reached the end of a stage of usefulness,
660:
Becker, Anne. (2006). A review of writing model research based on cognitive processes. In
Horning, Alice; Anne Becker (Eds.), Revision: History, theory, and practice; (Reference guides to rhetoric and composition); West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press (pp.
651:
Dave, Anish; David R. Russell. (2010). Drafting and revision using word processing by undergraduate student writers: Changing conceptions and practices. Research in the
Teaching of English 44.4, 406-434.
642:
Eckstein, Grant, Jessica
Chariton, Robb Mark McCollum. (2011). Multi-draft composing: An iterative model for academic argument writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10.3, 162-172.
610:
Leijten, Mariëlle; Van Waes, Luuk; Ransdell, Sarah (2010). "Correcting Text
Production Errors: Isolating the Effects of Writing Mode From Error Span, Input Mode, and Lexicality".
338:, Strunk and White characterize a first draft as a less-edited version of the final draft with the purpose of "foresee...the shape of what is to come and pursue that shape". In
452:. Through peer review, other people can give feedback to the writer, allowing said writer to fix previously unseen errors. Peer review of a draft is not exactly the same as
654:
Owens, Kim
Hensley. “Teaching ‘the Six’-and Beyond.” Pedagogy : critical approaches to teaching literature, language, culture, and composition 9.3 (2009): 389–397. Web.
353:
theory. Elbow reasoned that if a writer "learns to maximize the interaction" among their "ideas or points of view, can produce new ones that didn’t seem available."
540:
Leijten, Mariëlle; Van Waes, Luuk (2013). "Keystroke
Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes".
510:
137:
109:
116:
279:
261:
156:
59:
236:
681:
440:
numerous drafts, can save the writer time instead of having to physically rewrite the entirety of their drafts.
316:
refers to any process of generating preliminary versions of a written work. Drafting happens at any stage of the
90:
45:
185:
123:
94:
372:
of writers at work indicate that writers can be doing any or all of the following during phases of drafting:
686:
105:
664:"The Writing Process: Study Hall Composition #1: ASU + Crash Course." YouTube, YouTube, 31 Mar. 2020,
575:
Flower, Linda; Hayes, John R. (1980). "The
Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem".
392:
340:
83:
657:
Bohney, Brandie (Guest Editor). (2018). Fail
Forward! . Journal of Teaching Writing 33.2, 65-66.
377:
309:
334:
297:
130:
8:
691:
436:
51:
243:
192:
627:
592:
557:
369:
420:. Unlike with pen and paper, computers make it easier to compose new drafts thanks to
631:
561:
530:
Elbow, Peter. Writing
Without Teachers. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1973, 1998. p.50
521:
Elbow, Peter. Writing
Without Teachers. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1973, 1998. p.15
506:
475:
435:
In order to benefit from both, it is possible to type drafts on a computer and then
619:
584:
549:
485:
20:
350:
317:
421:
665:
675:
623:
553:
465:
425:
301:
453:
329:
may last for perpetuity as saved "versions" or as paper files in archives.
480:
470:
449:
345:
413:
596:
72:
588:
417:
292:
505:
The Elements of Style Fiftieth Anniversary Edition (2009), p. 15,
403:
pausing to make adjustments to spelling, word-choice, and syntax
366:
states, "mistakes are a success as long as you learn from it".
321:
382:
organizing their thinking in relation to text produced so far
235:
may be in need of reorganization to comply with Knowledge's
332:
For example, in a book that became popular in the 1950s,
200:
196:
609:
344:, a more recent take on the role of draft documents,
304:, including the President's handwritten annotations.
97:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
450:allowing others to check over and revise the work
673:
539:
424:that makes it easier to fix local, grammar and
448:When drafting, a major part of the process is
246:to make improvements to the overall structure.
416:in the 20th century, most writing is done on
407:
195:. Consider transferring direct quotations to
16:Preliminary stage of a written or visual work
362:problems and fix them. As Brandie Bohney in
666:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXa22Csh7oE
574:
443:
60:Learn how and when to remove these messages
280:Learn how and when to remove this message
262:Learn how and when to remove this message
157:Learn how and when to remove this message
488:, a similar concept, but for visual arts
291:
674:
577:College Composition and Communication
186:too many or overly lengthy quotations
397:discovering a central argument/point
388:explaining or linking examples/ideas
219:
168:
95:adding citations to reliable sources
66:
25:
13:
645:
14:
703:
41:This article has multiple issues.
224:
173:
71:
30:
82:needs additional citations for
49:or discuss these issues on the
19:For Drafting on Knowledge, see
603:
568:
533:
524:
515:
499:
1:
492:
7:
459:
385:experimenting with phrasing
10:
708:
408:Computers vs pen and paper
356:
18:
624:10.1177/0741088309359139
554:10.1177/0741088313491692
444:Drafting and peer review
422:word processing software
400:elaborating on key ideas
341:Writing Without Teachers
193:summarize the quotations
682:Composition (language)
305:
612:Written Communication
542:Written Communication
335:The Elements of Style
298:Franklin D. Roosevelt
295:
91:improve this article
687:Textual scholarship
310:written composition
244:editing the article
308:In the context of
306:
511:978-0-205-63264-0
476:Manuscript format
412:With the rise of
370:Empirical studies
290:
289:
282:
272:
271:
264:
237:layout guidelines
218:
217:
167:
166:
159:
141:
64:
699:
636:
635:
607:
601:
600:
572:
566:
565:
537:
531:
528:
522:
519:
513:
503:
486:Sketch (drawing)
285:
278:
267:
260:
256:
253:
247:
228:
227:
220:
213:
210:
204:
177:
176:
169:
162:
155:
151:
148:
142:
140:
106:"Draft document"
99:
75:
67:
56:
34:
33:
26:
21:Knowledge:Drafts
707:
706:
702:
701:
700:
698:
697:
696:
672:
671:
648:
646:Further reading
640:
639:
608:
604:
573:
569:
538:
534:
529:
525:
520:
516:
504:
500:
495:
462:
446:
426:spelling errors
410:
359:
351:writing process
327:draft documents
318:writing process
286:
275:
274:
273:
268:
257:
251:
248:
242:Please help by
241:
229:
225:
214:
208:
205:
199:or excerpts to
190:
178:
174:
163:
152:
146:
143:
100:
98:
88:
76:
35:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
705:
695:
694:
689:
684:
670:
669:
662:
658:
655:
652:
647:
644:
638:
637:
618:(2): 189–227.
602:
589:10.2307/356630
567:
548:(3): 358–392.
532:
523:
514:
497:
496:
494:
491:
490:
489:
483:
478:
473:
468:
461:
458:
445:
442:
409:
406:
405:
404:
401:
398:
395:
389:
386:
383:
380:
358:
355:
288:
287:
270:
269:
232:
230:
223:
216:
215:
181:
179:
172:
165:
164:
79:
77:
70:
65:
39:
38:
36:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
704:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
679:
677:
667:
663:
659:
656:
653:
650:
649:
643:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
606:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
571:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
536:
527:
518:
512:
508:
502:
498:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
466:Draft (music)
464:
463:
457:
455:
451:
441:
438:
433:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
402:
399:
396:
394:
390:
387:
384:
381:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
367:
365:
364:Fail Forward!
354:
352:
347:
343:
342:
337:
336:
330:
328:
323:
319:
315:
311:
303:
302:Infamy Speech
299:
294:
284:
281:
266:
263:
255:
252:February 2024
245:
239:
238:
233:This article
231:
222:
221:
212:
209:February 2024
202:
198:
194:
188:
187:
182:This article
180:
171:
170:
161:
158:
150:
147:February 2024
139:
136:
132:
129:
125:
122:
118:
115:
111:
108: –
107:
103:
102:Find sources:
96:
92:
86:
85:
80:This article
78:
74:
69:
68:
63:
61:
54:
53:
48:
47:
42:
37:
28:
27:
22:
641:
615:
611:
605:
583:(1): 21–32.
580:
576:
570:
545:
541:
535:
526:
517:
501:
454:proofreading
447:
434:
430:
411:
368:
363:
360:
339:
333:
331:
326:
313:
307:
276:
258:
249:
234:
206:
191:Please help
183:
153:
144:
134:
127:
120:
113:
101:
89:Please help
84:verification
81:
57:
50:
44:
43:Please help
40:
481:Rough ASCII
471:Foul papers
393:transitions
391:generating
376:developing
346:Peter Elbow
296:A draft of
692:Publishing
676:Categories
493:References
414:technology
201:Wikisource
117:newspapers
46:improve it
632:145049948
562:145446935
418:computers
197:Wikiquote
184:contains
52:talk page
460:See also
378:cohesion
314:drafting
661:25-49).
357:Process
322:writers
131:scholar
630:
597:356630
595:
560:
509:
133:
126:
119:
112:
104:
628:S2CID
593:JSTOR
558:S2CID
437:print
138:JSTOR
124:books
507:ISBN
110:news
620:doi
585:doi
550:doi
320:as
300:'s
93:by
678::
626:.
616:27
614:.
591:.
581:31
579:.
556:.
546:30
544:.
428:.
312:,
55:.
668:.
634:.
622::
599:.
587::
564:.
552::
283:)
277:(
265:)
259:(
254:)
250:(
240:.
211:)
207:(
203:.
189:.
160:)
154:(
149:)
145:(
135:·
128:·
121:·
114:·
87:.
62:)
58:(
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
