1161:
1173:
1149:
92:
conclude that "the OA advantage is a quality advantage, rather than a quality bias", that authors make a "self-selection toward using and citing the more citable articles—once OA self-archiving has made them accessible", and that open access "itself will not make an unusable (hence uncitable) paper more used and cited".
91:
One study concluded that authors in medical fields "concentrate on research published in journals that are available as full text on the internet, and ignore relevant studies that are not available in full text, thus introducing an element of bias into their search result". Authors of another study
75:
Scholars in some fields can more easily discover and access articles whose full text is available online, which increases authors' likelihood of reading and citing these articles, an issue that was first raised and has been mainly studied in connection with
84:, articles in expensive journals that do not provide open access may be "priced out of evidence", giving a greater weight to open access publications. Open access citation advantage may increase the
210:
Murali, N. S.; Murali, H. R.; Auethavekiat, P.; Erwin, P. J.; Mandrekar, J. N.; Manek, N. J.; Ghosh, A. K. (2004). "Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research".
551:
1111:
1096:
939:
588:
103:
available online more readily than articles that do not—this affects articles' citation count similarly to open access citation advantage.
331:
1106:
547:
298:
257:
866:
159:
1203:
929:
581:
377:
66:. The concept was introduced, under the FUTON bias name, by UK medical researcher Reinhard Wentz in a letter to
1198:
1126:
1121:
1091:
574:
1086:
639:
539:
63:
58:(OA)—that is, journals that make their full text available on the Internet without charge (not behind a
1139:
1101:
1081:
327:"An exploratory analysis of PubMed's free full-text limit on citation retrieval for clinical questions"
17:
409:"The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: Impact on citations and Altmetrics"
408:
1116:
1018:
962:
212:
81:
1058:
774:
730:
293:
112:
466:"Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research"
464:
Gargouri, Y.; Hajjem, C.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Carr, L.; Brody, T.; Harnad, S. (2010).
1048:
1023:
800:
709:
621:
255:
Ghosh, A. K.; Murali, N. S. (2003). "Online access to nephrology journals: The FUTON bias".
1038:
1003:
957:
845:
805:
790:
489:
127:
8:
597:
294:"The effect of online status on the impact factors of general internal medicine journals"
493:
1165:
1008:
644:
616:
512:
479:
465:
446:
353:
326:
237:
189:
100:
177:
1160:
1064:
952:
919:
740:
661:
517:
450:
438:
430:
358:
307:
274:
229:
181:
1172:
241:
1053:
967:
689:
611:
507:
497:
425:
420:
348:
340:
266:
221:
193:
173:
77:
51:
1177:
1028:
825:
815:
762:
745:
671:
502:
1153:
977:
947:
883:
850:
820:
769:
656:
651:
344:
117:
292:
Mueller, P. S.; Murali, N. S.; Cha, S. S.; Erwin, P. J.; Ghosh, A. K. (2006).
50:(for "full text on the net"), is a type of bias whereby scholars tend to cite
1193:
1187:
1033:
840:
810:
694:
679:
434:
85:
521:
442:
362:
311:
278:
233:
185:
1013:
871:
830:
684:
407:
Clayson, Peter E.; Baldwin, Scott A.; Larson, Michael J. (June 1, 2021).
270:
55:
893:
795:
385:
164:
122:
68:
1148:
566:
225:
914:
757:
987:
982:
909:
699:
470:
484:
378:"Opening up the Evidence: Evidence-Based Practice and Open Access"
88:
of open access journals relative to journals without open access.
924:
888:
835:
132:
95:
A similar phenomenon, termed the "no abstract available bias" or
59:
99:, is a scholar's tendency to cite journal articles that have an
972:
735:
725:
463:
1043:
704:
209:
31:
752:
540:"If It Doesn't Exist on the Internet, It Doesn't Exist"
325:
Krieger, M. M.; Richter, R. R.; Austin, T. M. (2008).
318:
285:
248:
200:
144:
27:
Tendency of scholars to cite journals with open access
1137:
291:
406:
324:
205:
203:
153:
151:
149:
147:
30:"FUTON" redirects here. For the bedding style, see
1185:
384:. Pacific University Libraries. Archived from
582:
254:
589:
575:
332:Journal of the Medical Library Association
537:
511:
501:
483:
424:
413:International Journal of Psychophysiology
352:
596:
14:
1186:
554:from the original on February 24, 2019
375:
1097:Academic databases and search engines
570:
548:State University of New York, Buffalo
157:
538:Goldsmith, K. (September 27, 2005).
160:"Visibility of research: FUTON bias"
299:The Netherlands Journal of Medicine
258:Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
24:
867:Academic journal publishing reform
531:
25:
1215:
1171:
1159:
1147:
544:Elective Affinities Conference
457:
426:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.006
400:
369:
265:(9): 1943, author reply 1943.
40:Open access citation advantage
13:
1:
1127:Category:Scientific documents
178:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11264-5
138:
1122:Category:Academic publishing
503:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
7:
106:
10:
1220:
940:Indexes and search engines
345:10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.010
29:
1074:
996:
938:
902:
859:
783:
718:
670:
632:
604:
1204:Open access (publishing)
64:toll-access publications
1117:Style/formatting guides
1019:Scholarly communication
719:Other publication types
213:Mayo Clinic Proceedings
82:evidence-based medicine
1059:Least publishable unit
731:Collection of articles
113:Availability heuristic
46:), sometimes known as
1049:Electronic publishing
1024:Scientific literature
801:Article-level metrics
1199:Academic terminology
1092:Open-access journals
1039:Open scientific data
846:SCImago Journal Rank
806:Author-level metrics
791:Acknowledgment index
388:on February 21, 2011
128:Predatory publishing
80:. In the context of
1087:Scientific journals
598:Academic publishing
494:2010PLoSO...513636G
382:Faculty Scholarship
376:Gilman, I. (2009).
62:)—in preference to
1107:Copyright policies
1102:University presses
1009:Scientific writing
877:Citation advantage
784:Impact and ranking
617:Scientific journal
271:10.1093/ndt/gfg247
158:Wentz, R. (2002).
1135:
1134:
1112:Preprint policies
1082:Academic journals
1065:Publish or perish
920:Version of record
860:Reform and access
662:Literature review
226:10.4065/79.8.1001
52:academic journals
16:(Redirected from
1211:
1176:
1175:
1164:
1163:
1152:
1151:
1143:
1054:Ingelfinger rule
968:Semantic Scholar
690:Technical report
612:Academic journal
591:
584:
577:
568:
567:
563:
561:
559:
526:
525:
515:
505:
487:
461:
455:
454:
428:
404:
398:
397:
395:
393:
373:
367:
366:
356:
322:
316:
315:
289:
283:
282:
252:
246:
245:
220:(8): 1001–1006.
207:
198:
197:
155:
78:medical research
21:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1170:
1158:
1146:
1138:
1136:
1131:
1070:
1029:Learned society
992:
934:
898:
855:
826:Journal ranking
816:Citation impact
779:
714:
672:Grey literature
666:
628:
600:
595:
557:
555:
534:
532:Further reading
529:
462:
458:
405:
401:
391:
389:
374:
370:
323:
319:
290:
286:
253:
249:
208:
201:
156:
145:
141:
109:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1217:
1207:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1181:
1180:
1168:
1156:
1133:
1132:
1130:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1084:
1078:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1068:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1000:
998:
997:Related topics
994:
993:
991:
990:
985:
980:
978:Web of Science
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
950:
948:Google Scholar
944:
942:
936:
935:
933:
932:
927:
922:
917:
912:
906:
904:
900:
899:
897:
896:
891:
886:
884:Serials crisis
881:
880:
879:
869:
863:
861:
857:
856:
854:
853:
851:Scientometrics
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
821:Citation index
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
787:
785:
781:
780:
778:
777:
772:
770:Poster session
767:
766:
765:
760:
750:
749:
748:
743:
733:
728:
722:
720:
716:
715:
713:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
682:
676:
674:
668:
667:
665:
664:
659:
657:Position paper
654:
652:Review article
649:
648:
647:
636:
634:
630:
629:
627:
626:
625:
624:
614:
608:
606:
602:
601:
594:
593:
586:
579:
571:
565:
564:
533:
530:
528:
527:
478:(10): e13636.
456:
399:
368:
339:(4): 351–355.
317:
284:
247:
199:
172:(9341): 1256.
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
130:
125:
120:
118:Digital divide
115:
108:
105:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1216:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1189:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1093:
1090:
1088:
1085:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1073:
1066:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1034:Open research
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1001:
999:
995:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
945:
943:
941:
937:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
907:
905:
901:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
878:
875:
874:
873:
870:
868:
865:
864:
862:
858:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
841:Impact factor
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
811:Bibliometrics
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
788:
786:
782:
776:
773:
771:
768:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
754:
751:
747:
744:
742:
739:
738:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
723:
721:
717:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
695:Annual report
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
681:
680:Working paper
678:
677:
675:
673:
669:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
646:
643:
642:
641:
638:
637:
635:
631:
623:
622:Public health
620:
619:
618:
615:
613:
610:
609:
607:
603:
599:
592:
587:
585:
580:
578:
573:
572:
569:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
523:
519:
514:
509:
504:
499:
495:
491:
486:
481:
477:
473:
472:
467:
460:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
403:
387:
383:
379:
372:
364:
360:
355:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
328:
321:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
295:
288:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
251:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
206:
204:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
166:
161:
154:
152:
150:
148:
143:
134:
131:
129:
126:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
104:
102:
98:
93:
89:
87:
86:impact factor
83:
79:
73:
71:
70:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
876:
556:. Retrieved
543:
475:
469:
459:
416:
412:
402:
390:. Retrieved
386:the original
381:
371:
336:
330:
320:
306:(2): 39–44.
303:
297:
287:
262:
256:
250:
217:
211:
169:
163:
96:
94:
90:
74:
67:
47:
43:
39:
38:
36:
1166:Mathematics
1014:Peer review
894:#ICanHazPDF
872:Open access
831:Eigenfactor
775:Proceedings
685:White paper
419:: 103–111.
56:open access
1188:Categories
930:Retraction
903:Versioning
796:Altmetrics
741:Biological
165:The Lancet
139:References
123:ICanHazPDF
72:in 2002.
69:The Lancet
48:FUTON bias
18:FUTON bias
915:Postprint
758:Monograph
710:Lab notes
485:1001.0361
451:232409668
435:0167-8760
1178:Internet
988:OpenAlex
983:Paperity
910:Preprint
746:Chemical
700:Pamphlet
645:Abstract
605:Journals
552:Archived
522:20976155
471:PLoS ONE
443:33774077
363:18974812
312:16517987
279:12937253
242:20536645
234:15301326
186:12401287
107:See also
101:abstract
97:NAA bias
1154:Science
1140:Portals
1004:Imprint
925:Erratum
889:Sci-Hub
836:h-index
763:Chapter
558:May 15,
513:2956678
490:Bibcode
392:July 5,
354:2568849
194:5084231
133:Sci-Hub
60:paywall
973:Scopus
953:AMiner
736:Patent
726:Thesis
633:Papers
520:
510:
449:
441:
433:
361:
351:
310:
277:
240:
232:
192:
184:
1075:Lists
1044:ORCID
705:Essay
640:Paper
480:arXiv
447:S2CID
238:S2CID
190:S2CID
54:with
32:Futon
1194:Bias
963:CORE
958:BASE
753:Book
560:2021
518:PMID
439:PMID
431:ISSN
394:2011
359:PMID
308:PMID
275:PMID
230:PMID
182:PMID
44:OACA
508:PMC
498:doi
421:doi
417:164
349:PMC
341:doi
267:doi
222:doi
174:doi
170:360
1190::
550:.
546:.
542:.
516:.
506:.
496:.
488:.
474:.
468:.
445:.
437:.
429:.
415:.
411:.
380:.
357:.
347:.
337:96
335:.
329:.
304:64
302:.
296:.
273:.
263:18
261:.
236:.
228:.
218:79
216:.
202:^
188:.
180:.
168:.
162:.
146:^
1142::
1067:"
1063:"
590:e
583:t
576:v
562:.
524:.
500::
492::
482::
476:5
453:.
423::
396:.
365:.
343::
314:.
281:.
269::
244:.
224::
196:.
176::
42:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.