208:, a standard form of contract widely used in the construction industry, allows the contractor to rectify a defect at their own expense in place of the common law position, and obliges the client to allow the contractor appropriate access to undertake the rectification work. At the end of an agreed period, a defects certificate may be issued, which is intended either to certify that there are no patent defects, or to state any defects which remain outstanding.
152:
In the literature, the concept of product quality risk has not been fully investigated. Although
Zsidisin stated that quality risk includes the risk of producing unsafe products that can harm the consumer, even when these defects are caused by another firm or inherited from a sub-contractor. However,
131:
Inherent quality problems (i.e. raw materials / ingredients / production / logistics / packaging) in any of the supply members trigger a domino effect that spread through a multi-tier supply network. For this reason, it is hard for a network member to keep track of who did what, and when, to the
132:
final quality of the products. The product that a focal firm sells to the consumer comprises components made by the focal firm and the suppliers. When the product breaks down due to defects in either the firm’s component or the supplier’s component, the firm has to bear the consequences.
180:
was asked to undertake) or, where the contractor has designed the work, the construction not compliant with any applicable law or with a design for the work offered by the contractor and accepted by the
93:
Depending on the given jurisdiction, the failure of a consumer to read the available warnings may negate causation for purposes of a defective or inadequate warning claim in a product liability suit.
127:
focuses on the quality problems in the supply chain context rather in the manufacturing quality context. Tse and Tan (2009) identified the concept of "Product
Quality Risk in Supply Chain" (PQR) as:
273:
You will recall the original factory outlet concept was defined by slightly defective but perfectly usable goods sold directly to consumers straight from the factory store. Today this is a rarity.
164:
The product quality risk in global supply chain concept, though similar to "product harm crisis" (defined as defective or dangerous products) and "moral hazard problem" (defined as the outcome of
57:, where the term is applied to "anything that renders the product not reasonably safe". The field of law that addresses injuries caused by defective products is called
104:
discovers that a line of shirts have been made with slightly uneven sleeves, the manufacturer may choose to sell these shirts at a discount, often through an
82:
if it was incorrectly manufactured, for example if the wrong materials are used. A product may also be considered legally defective if it lacks appropriate
432:
176:
In construction, defects include aspects of the constructed works which are not in accordance with the scope of the project (the work which the
78:, so that the design itself yields a product that can not perform its desired function. Even if the design is correct, the product may have a
141:
Product quality risk is an inherent part of the supply chain risks, with a tendency to comprise some or all of the risk elements, such as
168:, imperfect observability in supplier's quality), are not about the risk of product quality in a global supply chain context.
266:
186:
17:
477:
445:
149:'s toys, it tarnished the company's reputation, and disrupted the supply of its products in the market.
487:
96:
A product that is defective in some way that does not render it dangerous might still be sold, with a
395:
205:
97:
112:
cut off to indicate that the quality is not intended to reflect on the brand. For some products,
204:
should be put right by the client, who then sues the contractor for the costs of doing so. The
256:
482:
357:"Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations"
185:
or on the client's behalf. They may be "patent defects", observable in practice during or on
165:
458:
428:
113:
8:
376:
341:
306:
201:
177:
35:
380:
325:
310:
262:
83:
66:
A wide range of circumstances can render a product defective. The product may have a
59:
411:
368:
337:
298:
142:
302:
75:
372:
286:
217:
54:
43:
356:
109:
471:
190:
154:
145:, disruption risk and reputational risk. For example, when lead was found in
87:
47:
415:
158:
105:
182:
100:
price reflecting the defect. For example, where a clothing manufacturer's
399:
400:"Vendor Certification and Appraisal: Implications for Supplier Quality"
197:
101:
39:
287:"Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain"
53:
Product defects arise most prominently in legal contexts regarding
146:
193:", which are not visible or identifiable until a later date.
90:
of dangers accompanying normal use or misuse of the product.
74:, resulting from the product having been poorly designed or
119:
27:
Characteristic of a product which hinders its usability
461:, last updated 30 September 2020, accessed 8 May 2023.
435:, published 10 October 2017, accessed 29 April 2023.
393:
469:
200:, a defect which results from the contractor's
354:
291:International Journal of Production Research
242:Writing and Designing Manuals and Warnings
235:
233:
446:When is a defect not a Defect under NEC3?
355:Dawar, Niraj; Pillutla, Madan M. (2000).
206:NEC Engineering and Construction contract
323:
258:Cheap: The High Cost of Discount Culture
239:
326:"Managerial Perceptions of Supply Risk"
230:
14:
470:
330:The Journal of Supply Chain Management
284:
254:
285:Tse, Ying Kei; Tan, Kim Hua (2011).
125:Product quality risk in supply chain
120:Product quality risk in supply chain
24:
342:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00146.x
171:
25:
499:
189:of the construction process, or "
42:for the purpose for which it was
451:
438:
422:
387:
348:
317:
278:
248:
240:Robinson, Patricia A. (2009).
161:have been thoroughly studied.
136:
13:
1:
433:Guide to construction defects
361:Journal of Marketing Research
223:
324:Zsidisin, George A. (2003).
303:10.1080/00207543.2010.508942
255:Shell, Ellen Ruppel (2009).
86:for its use, or appropriate
7:
373:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.215.18729
211:
34:is any characteristic of a
10:
504:
457:Designing Buildings Wiki,
429:Simmons & Simmons LLP
396:Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli
448:, accessed 8 May 2023.
416:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0557
166:asymmetric information
134:
129:
153:neither PQR nor its
80:manufacturing defect
459:Defects certificate
478:Quality management
404:Management Science
202:breach of contract
38:which hinders its
488:Product liability
410:(10): 1472–1482.
60:product liability
16:(Redirected from
495:
462:
455:
449:
442:
436:
426:
420:
419:
391:
385:
384:
352:
346:
345:
321:
315:
314:
282:
276:
275:
252:
246:
245:
237:
143:operational risk
116:is appropriate.
21:
503:
502:
498:
497:
496:
494:
493:
492:
468:
467:
466:
465:
456:
452:
443:
439:
427:
423:
392:
388:
353:
349:
322:
318:
283:
279:
269:
261:. p. 104.
253:
249:
238:
231:
226:
214:
174:
172:In construction
139:
122:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
501:
491:
490:
485:
480:
464:
463:
450:
437:
421:
386:
367:(2): 215–226.
347:
316:
277:
267:
247:
244:. p. 234.
228:
227:
225:
222:
221:
220:
218:Product recall
213:
210:
191:latent defects
173:
170:
138:
135:
121:
118:
55:product safety
32:product defect
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
500:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
475:
473:
460:
454:
447:
441:
434:
430:
425:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
390:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
351:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
320:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
281:
274:
270:
268:9781101135471
264:
260:
259:
251:
243:
236:
234:
229:
219:
216:
215:
209:
207:
203:
199:
194:
192:
188:
184:
179:
169:
167:
162:
160:
156:
155:domino effect
150:
148:
144:
133:
128:
126:
117:
115:
111:
108:and with the
107:
103:
99:
94:
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:design defect
64:
62:
61:
56:
51:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
18:Flaw (defect)
483:Business law
453:
440:
424:
407:
403:
394:Hwang, Iny;
389:
364:
360:
350:
333:
329:
319:
294:
290:
280:
272:
257:
250:
241:
195:
175:
163:
159:supply chain
151:
140:
130:
124:
123:
106:outlet store
95:
92:
84:instructions
79:
71:
67:
65:
58:
52:
48:manufactured
31:
29:
444:Evans, S.,
297:: 139–158.
137:In practice
72:design flaw
472:Categories
224:References
198:common law
187:completion
178:contractor
102:inspection
98:discounted
381:167532080
336:: 14–26.
311:110472062
40:usability
398:(2006).
212:See also
88:warnings
44:designed
157:in the
36:product
379:
309:
265:
196:Under
183:client
147:Mattel
114:rework
76:tested
377:S2CID
307:S2CID
110:label
263:ISBN
46:and
412:doi
369:doi
338:doi
299:doi
70:or
474::
431:,
408:52
406:.
402:.
375:.
365:37
363:.
359:.
334:39
332:.
328:.
305:.
295:49
293:.
289:.
271:.
232:^
63:.
50:.
30:A
418:.
414::
383:.
371::
344:.
340::
313:.
301::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.