29:
239:, the Christian lobbying group which had been party to the case, described the decision as "dangerous" and "destructive". It was welcomed by children's rights groups including Save the Children South Africa and the Children's Institute at the
385:
279:
257:
411:
451:
360:
225:, so that parents are no longer exempt from prosecution or conviction for assault for striking their children. The unanimous judgment was written by
304:
244:
331:
456:
471:
476:
210:
39:
461:
236:
214:
189:
226:
124:
102:
466:
50:
Freedom of
Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others
240:
203:
Freedom of
Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others
193:
8:
28:
92:
436:
222:
22:
Freedom of
Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
206:
155:
147:
106:
74:
386:"Spanking your child at home is now officially illegal, following ConCourt ruling"
229:
121:
412:"Social Development welcomes Constitutional Court judgment on child discipline"
143:
414:(Press release). Pretoria: Department of Social Development. 19 September 2019
445:
151:
139:
135:
128:
305:"Mixed reaction to Constitutional Court's ruling over spanking of children"
280:"Ruling banning the spanking of children is both legally and morally sound"
163:
131:
361:"Spanking ban is dangerous, destructive and disturbing, says lobby group"
218:
159:
332:"South Africa divided over ConCourt's corporal punishment ruling"
258:
Christian
Education South Africa v Minister of Education
221:
defence of "moderate and reasonable chastisement" is
443:
354:
352:
378:
349:
278:Sibanda, Omphemetse S (22 September 2019).
452:Constitutional Court of South Africa cases
27:
358:
323:
297:
277:
444:
329:
235:Reactions to the decision were mixed.
232:and handed down on 18 September 2019.
217:is illegal. The court found that the
359:Mitchley, Alex (18 September 2019).
211:Constitutional Court of South Africa
107:Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg
40:Constitutional Court of South Africa
330:Lindwa, Buhle (18 September 2019).
13:
14:
488:
430:
245:Department of Social Development
237:Freedom of Religion South Africa
457:South African criminal case law
215:corporal punishment in the home
190:corporal punishment in the home
404:
271:
1:
264:
472:Corporal punishment case law
7:
477:Child abuse in South Africa
250:
59:18 September 2019
10:
493:
93:[2017] ZAGPJHC 290
462:2019 in South African law
188:
183:
175:
170:
117:
112:
98:
85:
80:
70:
55:
45:
35:
26:
21:
16:South African legal case
241:University of Cape Town
207:[2019] ZACC 34
75:[2019] ZACC 34
209:is a decision of the
437:Text of the judgment
243:, as well as by the
392:. 18 September 2019
311:. 18 September 2019
336:The South African
213:which found that
199:
198:
194:children's rights
484:
467:2019 in case law
424:
423:
421:
419:
408:
402:
401:
399:
397:
382:
376:
375:
373:
371:
356:
347:
346:
344:
342:
327:
321:
320:
318:
316:
301:
295:
294:
292:
290:
275:
223:unconstitutional
113:Court membership
66:
64:
31:
19:
18:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
442:
441:
433:
428:
427:
417:
415:
410:
409:
405:
395:
393:
384:
383:
379:
369:
367:
357:
350:
340:
338:
328:
324:
314:
312:
303:
302:
298:
288:
286:
276:
272:
267:
253:
230:Mogoeng Mogoeng
62:
60:
17:
12:
11:
5:
490:
480:
479:
474:
469:
464:
459:
454:
440:
439:
432:
431:External links
429:
426:
425:
403:
377:
348:
322:
296:
284:Daily Maverick
269:
268:
266:
263:
262:
261:
252:
249:
197:
196:
186:
185:
181:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
167:
119:
118:Judges sitting
115:
114:
110:
109:
100:
96:
95:
87:
83:
82:
78:
77:
72:
68:
67:
57:
53:
52:
47:
46:Full case name
43:
42:
37:
33:
32:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
449:
447:
438:
435:
434:
413:
407:
391:
387:
381:
366:
362:
355:
353:
337:
333:
326:
310:
306:
300:
285:
281:
274:
270:
260:
259:
255:
254:
248:
246:
242:
238:
233:
231:
228:
227:Chief Justice
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
204:
195:
191:
187:
182:
178:
174:
171:Case opinions
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
130:
126:
123:
120:
116:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:Appealed from
97:
94:
91:
88:
84:
79:
76:
73:
69:
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
41:
38:
34:
30:
25:
20:
418:26 September
416:. Retrieved
406:
396:26 September
394:. Retrieved
389:
380:
370:26 September
368:. Retrieved
364:
341:26 September
339:. Retrieved
335:
325:
315:26 September
313:. Retrieved
308:
299:
289:26 September
287:. Retrieved
283:
273:
256:
234:
202:
201:
200:
89:
86:Prior action
81:Case history
49:
390:The Citizen
176:Decision by
446:Categories
265:References
219:common law
103:High Court
63:2019-09-18
251:See also
184:Keywords
156:Mhlantla
152:Khampepe
144:Froneman
71:Citation
179:Mogoeng
162:AJ and
148:Goliath
136:Cameron
122:Mogoeng
61: (
56:Decided
365:News24
164:Theron
140:Dlodlo
129:Basson
90:YG v S
160:Petse
36:Court
420:2019
398:2019
372:2019
343:2019
317:2019
291:2019
150:AJ,
142:AJ,
309:702
158:J,
154:J,
146:J,
138:J,
448::
388:.
363:.
351:^
334:.
307:.
282:.
247:.
192:,
134:,
132:AJ
127:,
125:CJ
105:,
422:.
400:.
374:.
345:.
319:.
293:.
166:J
65:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
