Knowledge

GeoSPARQL

Source 📝

332: 597:). In addition, significant work remains in developing vocabularies for spatial data, and expanding the GeoSPARQL vocabularies with OWL axioms to aid in logical spatial reasoning would be a valuable contribution. There are also large amounts of existing feature data represented in either a GML file (or similar serialization) or in a datastore supporting the 503:
Benchmarking GeoSPARQL 1.0 and geospatial-enabled triplestores, in general, has been conducted using several approaches. One can distinguish between performance and compliance benchmarks. The former can reveal whether a triplestore gives a timely answer to a GeoSPARQL query and may or may not check
609:
This led to the re-establishment of the GeoSPARQL Standards Working Group with a newly formed working group charter in September 2020. The group is working towards a new release of the GeoSPARQL standard, with non-breaking changes - GeoSPARQL 1.1 - in the summer of 2021, the development of which can
511:
Compliance benchmarking of OGC standards is usually conducted as part of the OGC Team Engine Test Suite which allows companies to obtain certification for implementing certain OGC specifications correctly. As of 2021, however, the OGC Team Engine does not provide a set of compliance tests to test
493:
Virtuoso Universal Server is a middleware and database engine hybrid that combines the functionality of a traditional Relational database management system (RDBMS), Object-relational database (ORDBMS), virtual database, RDF, XML, free-text, web application server and file server functionality in a
512:
GeoSPARQL compliance. Nevertheless, in 2021, Jovanovik et al. developed the first comprehensive, reproducible GeoSPARQL Compliance benchmark in which nine different triple stores were initially tested. The results of these first compliance tests along with the software are available on Github.
507:
Well-known geospatial performance benchmarks include the Geographica and Geographica 2 benchmarks which track the performance of predefined sets of queries on synthetic and real-world datasets. They each test a subset of GeoSPARQL query functions for performance. Another performance benchmark by
472:
GraphDB is an enterprise ready Semantic Graph Database, compliant with W3C Standards. Semantic graph databases (also called RDF triplestores) provide the core infrastructure for solutions where modelling agility, data integration, relationship exploration and cross-enterprise data publishing and
429:
Strabon is an open-source semantic spatiotemporal RDF store that supports two popular extensions of SPARQL: stSPARQL and GeoSPARQL. Strabon is built by extending RDF4J and extends it to manage thematic, spatial and temporal data that is stored in the backend RDBMS. It has been fully tested with
605:
In 2019, the OGC's GeoSemantics Domain Working Group set out to assess the current usage of GeoSPARQL in different domains in the White Paper "OGC Benefits of Representing Spatial Data Using Semantic and Graph Technologies" and collected initial feature requests to extend GeoSPARQL.
625:, an outline of the additions which are likely to be present in GeoSPARQL 1.1 has been presented. The changes have been further consolidated and summarized in a publication in the ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation. 504:
the answer for correctness. The latter checks whether a triplestore gives compliant answers with respect to the definitions of the GeoSPARQL 1.0 standard irrespective of the time the query takes for execution.
335:
A graphical representation of Region Connection Calculus (RCC: Randell, Cui and Cohn, 1992) and the links to the equivalent naming by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) with their equivalent URIs.
412:
Eclipse RDF4J is an open-source Java framework for scalable RDF processing, storage, reasoning and SPARQL querying. It offers support for a large subset of GeoSPARQL functionality.
344:
There are (almost) no complete implementations of GeoSPARQL; however, there are partial or vendor implementations of GeoSPARQL. Currently there are the following implementations:
1614: 534: 1306:
Abhayaratna, J; van den Brink, L; Car, N; Atkinson, R; Homburg, T; Knibbe, F; McGlinn, K; Wagner, A; Bonduel, M; Holten Rasmussen, M; Thiery, F (5 October 2020).
598: 1607: 703: 457:
uSeekM IndexingSail uses a PostGIS installation to deliver GeoSPARQL. They deliver partial implementation of GeoSPARQL along with some vendor prefixes.
41:. The definition of a small ontology based on well-understood OGC standards is intended to provide a standardized exchange basis for geospatial 957: 1600: 540: 105: 483:
Stardog is an enterprise data unification platform built on smart graph technology: query, search, inference, and data virtualization.
982: 759: 448: 1033:
Garbis, George; Kyzirakos, Kostis; Koubarakis, Manolis (2013). "Geographica: A Benchmark for Geospatial RDF Stores (Long Version)".
331: 935: 297:"POLYGON((-77.089005 38.913574,-77.029953 38.913574,-77.029953 38.886321,-77.089005 38.886321,-77.089005 38.913574))" 601:. It would be beneficial to develop standard processes for converting (or virtually converting and exposing) this data to RDF. 1321: 1050: 891: 684: 1509:"Introduction to geospatial semantics and technology workshop handbook: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1109" 1383:"GeoSPARQL 1.1: Motivations, Details and Applications of the Decadal Update to the Most Important Geospatial LOD Standard" 1362: 1284: 835: 1767: 460: 1125:"Assessment and Benchmarking of Spatially Enabled RDF Stores for the Next Generation of Spatial Data Infrastructure" 186: 155: 1037:. 12th International Semantic Web Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8219. pp. 343–359. 524: 508:
Huang et al. assessed the performance of GeoSPARQL-enabled triple stores as part of a spatial data infrastructure.
817: 589:
Obvious extensions are to define new conformance classes for other standard serializations of geometry data (e.g.
393: 122:(a.k.a. Clementini, Egenhofer) topological relationship vocabularies and ontologies for qualitative reasoning, and 1504: 402:
Parliament has an almost complete implementation of GeoSPARQL by using JENA and a modified ARQ query processor.
87: 42: 1666: 725: 711: 152:
The following example SPARQL query could help model the question "What is within the bounding box defined by
23: 1528: 420: 1074:
Ioannidis, Theofilos; Garbis, George; Kyzirakos, Kostis; Bereta, Konstantina; Koubarakis, Manolis (2021).
1636: 1008: 1681: 1624: 1559: 1464: 1423: 115: 34: 1762: 1656: 488: 101: 1592: 961: 64:
data set is a work of the Agile Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web (AKSW) research group at the
1772: 858: 546: 1691: 1661: 1587: 781: 590: 138: 45:
data which can support both qualitative and quantitative spatial reasoning and querying with the
1736: 1472: 1431: 1686: 354: 95: 65: 57: 799: 1741: 1731: 1716: 1394: 1205: 1136: 573: 986: 767: 8: 1721: 1671: 1266: 1398: 1209: 1140: 1195: 1105: 1087: 1056: 943: 554: 451: 1508: 1364:
GeoSPARQL 1.1: an almost decadal update to the most important geospatial LOD standard
1109: 1046: 887: 1555: 1060: 915: 1706: 1485: 1444: 1402: 1329: 1246: 1213: 1144: 1097: 1038: 877: 634: 1343: 611: 1777: 1726: 1568: 1308:"OGC Benefits of Representing Spatial Data Using Semantic and Graph Technologies" 1042: 882: 560: 529: 424: 397: 348: 111: 53: 1307: 1292: 1251: 1234: 843: 1101: 857:
Kyzirakos, Kostis; Karpathiotakis, Manos; Koubarakis, Manolis (November 2012).
134:
a set of topological SPARQL extension functions for quantitative reasoning, and
1164: 1756: 1577: 1075: 201: 188: 170: 157: 73: 1701: 30: 618: 1489: 1448: 1407: 1382: 1218: 1183: 370: 26: 1149: 1124: 1641: 821: 431: 390: 362: 141:(RIF) Core inference rules for query transformation and interpretation. 91: 1622: 1481: 1440: 1564: 1424:"Enabling the Geospatial Semantic Web with Parliament and GeoSPARQL" 1123:
Huang, Weiming; Raza, Syed Amir; Mirzov, Oleg; Harrie, Lars (2019).
1076:"Evaluating Geospatial RDF Stores Using the Benchmark Geographica 2" 622: 60:
mappings for GeoSPARQL equivalent properties in its vocabulary. The
1676: 1305: 1200: 1092: 869: 733: 565: 84: 1711: 856: 594: 439: 435: 358: 69: 1532: 417: 1646: 1503: 920: 873: 639: 467: 128: 119: 46: 1073: 1465:"Design and Development of Linked Data from The National Map" 1573: 585:
With regards to future work, the GeoSPARQL standard states:
535:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
61: 1696: 325: 1583: 498: 1032: 740: 664: 652: 385:
Support for GeoSPARQL was added to Ontop in version 4.2.
375:
Since version 2.11 Apache Jena has a GeoSPARQL extension.
380: 1233:
Jovanovik, Milos; Homburg, Timo; Spasić, Mirko (2021).
1182:
Jovanovik, Milos; Homburg, Timo; Spasić, Mirko (2021).
1232: 1181: 478: 328:
has been implemented in GeoSPARQL as described below:
240:<http://www.opengis.net/def/function/geosparql/> 1122: 872:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7649. 1556:
GeoSPARQL – A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data
520:
The GeoSPARQL standard was submitted to the OGC by:
407: 72:, that uses the GeoSPARQL vocabulary to represent 1381:Car, Nicholas J.; Homburg, Timo (February 2022). 1235:"Software for the GeoSPARQL compliance benchmark" 983:"GeoReference - uSeekM - Adds Meaning to the Web" 958:"IndexingSail - uSeekM - Adds Meaning to the Web" 1754: 353:GeoSPARQL was implemented in the context of the 1387:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1188:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1129:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1608: 760:"Proposal to Implement GeoSPARQL in Marmotta" 228:<http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#> 1462: 1361:Car, Nicholas J.; Homburg, Timo (May 2021). 541:Defence Geospatial Information Working Group 1421: 746: 685:"GeoSPARQL and Ordnance Survey Linked Data" 670: 658: 1615: 1601: 1380: 1360: 913: 870:11th International Semantic Web Conference 106:well-known text representation of geometry 1406: 1250: 1217: 1199: 1148: 1091: 881: 22:is a model for representing and querying 1006: 842:. The Eclipse Foundation. Archived from 438:and PostgreSQL-Temporal extensions) and 330: 320: 1463:Usery, E. Lynn; Varanka, Dalia (2012). 876:, MA, United States. pp. 295–311. 682: 499:Performance and Compliance Benchmarking 79:In particular, GeoSPARQL provides for: 1755: 1267:"OpenLinkSoftware: GeoSPARQLBenchmark" 1596: 859:"Strabon: A Semantic Geospatial DBMS" 800:"Standards compliance: GeoSPARQL 1.0" 701: 623:Extended Semantic Web Conference 2021 580: 1526: 1422:Battle, Robert; Kolas, Dave (2012). 1350:. Open Geospatial Consortium. 2020. 1007:Williams, Hugh (October 29, 2018). 13: 1184:"A GeoSPARQL Compliance Benchmark" 732:. AKSW. 2012-05-18. Archived from 704:"New Linked Data service launches" 357:2015. on Apache Marmotta; it uses 339: 14: 1789: 1549: 1514:. United States Geological Survey 1013:OpenLink Software Community Forum 1009:"Virtuoso GeoSPARQL Demo Server" 525:Australian Bureau of Meteorology 1505:United States Geological Survey 1374: 1354: 1336: 1314: 1299: 1277: 1259: 1226: 1175: 1157: 1116: 1067: 1026: 1000: 975: 950: 928: 907: 850: 828: 810: 683:Goodwin, John (26 April 2013). 361:, and it is available just for 1527:Goad, Chris (September 2004). 1370:. GeoLD Workshop at ESWC 2021. 914:jeff-davis (21 January 2021). 792: 782:"Spatial searches with SPARQL" 774: 752: 718: 695: 676: 1: 1310:. Open Geospatial Consortium. 645: 515: 16:Standardised SPARQL extension 1565:Linked Data Platform webapps 1043:10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_22 1035:The Semantic Web – ISWC 2013 883:10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_19 866:The Semantic Web – ISWC 2012 840:Eclipse rdf4j: documentation 689:johngoodwin225.wordpress.com 551:Interactive Instruments GmbH 33:. It is standardized by the 7: 1344:"OGC GeoSPARQL SWG Charter" 1252:10.1016/j.simpa.2021.100071 628: 68:, a group mostly known for 10: 1794: 1768:Open Geospatial Consortium 1625:Open Geospatial Consortium 1560:Open Geospatial Consortium 1169:Open Geospatial Consortium 1102:10.1007/s13740-021-00118-x 473:consumption are important. 147: 56:Linked Data Platform uses 35:Open Geospatial Consortium 1632: 1080:Journal on Data Semantics 708:blog.ordnancesurvey.co.uk 489:Virtuoso Universal Server 102:Geography Markup Language 98:for representation using 49:database query language. 836:"Programming with RDF4J" 547:Natural Resources Canada 461:Oracle Spatial and Graph 216: 1588:Ordnance Survey Ireland 747:Battle & Kolas 2012 671:Battle & Kolas 2012 659:Battle & Kolas 2012 202:38.886321°N 77.029953°W 171:38.913574°N 77.089005°W 139:Rule Interchange Format 621:, held as part of the 603: 423:20 August 2014 at the 336: 131:query interface using 916:"PostgreSQL-Temporal" 702:Gemma (3 June 2013). 599:general feature model 587: 570:Traverse Technologies 396:30 April 2014 at the 355:Google Summer of Code 334: 321:RCC8 use in GeoSPARQL 207:38.886321; -77.029953 176:38.913574; -77.089005 66:University of Leipzig 1490:10.3233/SW-2011-0054 1449:10.3233/SW-2012-0065 1408:10.3390/ijgi11020117 1219:10.3390/ijgi10070487 574:US Geological Survey 1672:OGC Reference Model 1399:2022IJGI...11..117C 1332:on 18 January 2021. 1210:2021IJGI...10..487J 1150:10.3390/ijgi8070310 1141:2019IJGI....8..310H 846:on 4 November 2016. 619:GeoLD workshop 2021 442:(with geom module). 198: /  167: /  108:(WKT) literals, and 1558:standard from the 1285:"Geosemantics DWG" 714:on 8 October 2013. 581:Future development 447:OpenSahara uSeekM 337: 1750: 1749: 1623:Standards of the 1295:on 9 August 2020. 1052:978-3-642-41338-4 946:on 28 March 2012. 893:978-3-642-35175-4 824:on 30 April 2014. 730:linkedgeodata.org 1785: 1763:GIS file formats 1617: 1610: 1603: 1594: 1593: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1535:on 22 April 2012 1531:. Archived from 1529:"RDF versus GML" 1523: 1521: 1519: 1513: 1500: 1498: 1496: 1469: 1459: 1457: 1455: 1428: 1413: 1412: 1410: 1378: 1372: 1371: 1369: 1358: 1352: 1351: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1328:. Archived from 1318: 1312: 1311: 1303: 1297: 1296: 1291:. Archived from 1281: 1275: 1274: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1239:Software Impacts 1230: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1203: 1179: 1173: 1172: 1161: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1120: 1114: 1113: 1095: 1086:(3–4): 189–228. 1071: 1065: 1064: 1030: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1019: 1004: 998: 997: 995: 994: 985:. Archived from 979: 973: 972: 970: 969: 960:. Archived from 954: 948: 947: 942:. Archived from 932: 926: 925: 911: 905: 904: 902: 900: 885: 863: 854: 848: 847: 832: 826: 825: 820:. Archived from 814: 808: 807: 796: 790: 789: 778: 772: 771: 766:. Archived from 756: 750: 744: 738: 737: 736:on 15 June 2021. 722: 716: 715: 710:. Archived from 699: 693: 692: 680: 674: 668: 662: 656: 635:Spatial relation 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 295: 292: 289: 286: 283: 280: 277: 274: 271: 268: 265: 262: 259: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 213: 212: 210: 209: 208: 203: 199: 196: 195: 194: 191: 182: 181: 179: 178: 177: 172: 168: 165: 164: 163: 160: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1773:RDF data access 1753: 1752: 1751: 1746: 1628: 1621: 1584:data.geohive.ie 1569:Ordnance Survey 1552: 1547: 1538: 1536: 1517: 1515: 1511: 1507:(30 May 2012). 1494: 1492: 1467: 1453: 1451: 1426: 1417: 1416: 1379: 1375: 1367: 1359: 1355: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1322:"GeoSPARQL SWG" 1320: 1319: 1315: 1304: 1300: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1231: 1227: 1180: 1176: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1121: 1117: 1072: 1068: 1053: 1031: 1027: 1017: 1015: 1005: 1001: 992: 990: 981: 980: 976: 967: 965: 956: 955: 951: 934: 933: 929: 912: 908: 898: 896: 894: 861: 855: 851: 834: 833: 829: 816: 815: 811: 798: 797: 793: 780: 779: 775: 758: 757: 753: 745: 741: 724: 723: 719: 700: 696: 681: 677: 669: 665: 657: 653: 648: 631: 610:be followed on 583: 561:Ordnance Survey 530:Bentley Systems 518: 501: 425:Wayback Machine 398:Wayback Machine 349:Apache Marmotta 342: 340:Implementations 323: 318: 317: 314: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 206: 204: 200: 197: 192: 189: 187: 185: 184: 175: 173: 169: 166: 161: 158: 156: 154: 153: 150: 112:Simple Features 54:Ordnance Survey 17: 12: 11: 5: 1791: 1781: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1748: 1747: 1745: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1639: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1620: 1619: 1612: 1605: 1597: 1591: 1590: 1581: 1571: 1562: 1551: 1550:External links 1548: 1546: 1545: 1524: 1501: 1460: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1373: 1353: 1335: 1313: 1298: 1276: 1258: 1225: 1174: 1156: 1115: 1066: 1051: 1025: 999: 974: 949: 927: 906: 892: 849: 827: 809: 791: 773: 770:on 2015-06-26. 751: 749:, p. 363. 739: 717: 694: 675: 673:, p. 358. 663: 661:, p. 355. 650: 649: 647: 644: 643: 642: 637: 630: 627: 582: 579: 578: 577: 571: 568: 563: 558: 552: 549: 544: 538: 532: 527: 517: 514: 500: 497: 496: 495: 494:single system. 491: 485: 484: 481: 475: 474: 470: 464: 463: 458: 455: 444: 443: 427: 414: 413: 410: 404: 403: 400: 387: 386: 383: 377: 376: 373: 367: 366: 351: 341: 338: 322: 319: 217: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 135: 125: 124: 123: 109: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1790: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1758: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1723: 1720: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1626: 1618: 1613: 1611: 1606: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1578:OpenStreetMap 1575: 1574:LinkedGeoData 1572: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1534: 1530: 1525: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1474: 1466: 1461: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1409: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1377: 1366: 1365: 1357: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1317: 1309: 1302: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1280: 1272: 1268: 1262: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1229: 1220: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1178: 1170: 1166: 1165:"TEAM Engine" 1160: 1151: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1119: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1070: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1029: 1014: 1010: 1003: 989:on 2014-04-15 988: 984: 978: 964:on 2014-04-15 963: 959: 953: 945: 941: 937: 931: 923: 922: 917: 910: 895: 889: 884: 879: 875: 871: 867: 860: 853: 845: 841: 837: 831: 823: 819: 813: 805: 801: 795: 787: 783: 777: 769: 765: 764:Marmotta Wiki 761: 755: 748: 743: 735: 731: 727: 721: 713: 709: 705: 698: 690: 686: 679: 672: 667: 660: 655: 651: 641: 638: 636: 633: 632: 626: 624: 620: 615: 613: 607: 602: 600: 596: 592: 586: 575: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 522: 521: 513: 509: 505: 492: 490: 487: 486: 482: 480: 477: 476: 471: 469: 466: 465: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 428: 426: 422: 419: 416: 415: 411: 409: 408:Eclipse RDF4J 406: 405: 401: 399: 395: 392: 389: 388: 384: 382: 379: 378: 374: 372: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 350: 347: 346: 345: 333: 329: 327: 215: 211: 180: 140: 136: 133: 132: 130: 126: 121: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 99: 97: 93: 89: 86: 82: 81: 80: 77: 75: 74:OpenStreetMap 71: 67: 63: 62:LinkedGeoData 59: 55: 50: 48: 44: 40: 39:OGC GeoSPARQL 36: 32: 28: 25: 21: 1702:TransducerML 1651: 1567:from the UK 1537:. Retrieved 1533:the original 1516:. Retrieved 1493:. Retrieved 1477: 1473:Semantic Web 1471: 1452:. Retrieved 1436: 1432:Semantic Web 1430: 1390: 1386: 1376: 1363: 1356: 1347: 1338: 1330:the original 1325: 1316: 1301: 1293:the original 1288: 1279: 1270: 1261: 1242: 1238: 1228: 1191: 1187: 1177: 1168: 1159: 1132: 1128: 1118: 1083: 1079: 1069: 1034: 1028: 1016:. Retrieved 1012: 1002: 991:. Retrieved 987:the original 977: 966:. Retrieved 962:the original 952: 944:the original 940:MonetDB Docs 939: 936:"GeoSpatial" 930: 919: 909: 897:. Retrieved 865: 852: 844:the original 839: 830: 822:the original 818:"Parliament" 812: 803: 794: 785: 776: 768:the original 763: 754: 742: 734:the original 729: 720: 712:the original 707: 697: 688: 678: 666: 654: 616: 608: 604: 588: 584: 519: 510: 506: 502: 449:IndexingSail 343: 324: 151: 78: 51: 38: 31:Semantic Web 19: 18: 1518:18 December 1495:19 December 1484:: 371–384. 1454:21 November 1443:: 355–370. 899:21 November 786:Apache Jena 454:Sail plugin 371:Apache Jena 264:hasGeometry 205: / 174: / 85:topological 27:linked data 1757:Categories 1642:GeoPackage 1539:4 December 1393:(2): 117. 1245:: 100071. 1201:2102.06139 1194:(7): 487. 1135:(7): 310. 1093:1906.01933 1018:9 February 993:2014-04-14 968:2012-12-16 646:References 516:Submission 432:PostgreSQL 391:Parliament 363:PostgreSQL 309:wktLiteral 193:77°01′48″W 190:38°53′11″N 162:77°05′20″W 159:38°54′49″N 104:(GML) and 24:geospatial 1652:GeoSPARQL 1482:IOS Press 1441:IOS Press 1110:174799159 726:"Imprint" 381:Ontop VKG 291:?geometry 267:?geometry 137:a set of 20:GeoSPARQL 1677:SensorML 1061:40326844 629:See also 566:Raytheon 421:Archived 394:Archived 285:sfWithin 88:ontology 83:a small 29:for the 1712:WaterML 1667:O&M 1395:Bibcode 1348:ogc.org 1326:ogc.org 1289:ogc.org 1206:Bibcode 1137:Bibcode 617:At the 595:GeoJSON 557:America 543:(DGIWG) 537:(CSIRO) 479:Stardog 468:GraphDB 440:MonetDB 436:PostGIS 418:Strabon 359:PostGIS 148:Example 70:DBpedia 1778:SPARQL 1647:GeoRSS 1271:Github 1108:  1059:  1049:  921:GitHub 890:  874:Boston 640:DE-9IM 612:Github 576:(USGS) 555:Oracle 452:Sesame 434:(with 273:FILTER 243:SELECT 231:PREFIX 219:PREFIX 129:SPARQL 120:DE-9IM 118:, and 76:data. 47:SPARQL 1627:(OGC) 1586:from 1512:(PDF) 1480:(4). 1468:(PDF) 1439:(4). 1427:(PDF) 1368:(PDF) 1196:arXiv 1106:S2CID 1088:arXiv 1057:S2CID 862:(PDF) 804:Ontop 255:?what 249:WHERE 246:?what 1732:WMTS 1697:SRID 1580:data 1576:for 1541:2012 1520:2012 1497:2012 1456:2012 1047:ISBN 1020:2024 901:2012 888:ISBN 326:RCC8 279:geof 234:geof 183:and 116:RCC8 92:RDFS 52:The 1742:WRS 1737:WPS 1727:WMS 1722:WFS 1717:WCS 1707:TMS 1692:SLD 1687:SFA 1682:SOS 1662:KML 1657:GML 1637:CSW 1486:doi 1445:doi 1403:doi 1247:doi 1214:doi 1145:doi 1098:doi 1039:doi 878:doi 591:KML 303:geo 258:geo 222:geo 214:?" 96:OWL 90:in 58:OWL 43:RDF 37:as 1759:: 1476:. 1470:. 1435:. 1429:. 1401:. 1391:11 1389:. 1385:. 1346:. 1324:. 1287:. 1269:. 1241:. 1237:. 1212:. 1204:. 1192:10 1190:. 1186:. 1167:. 1143:. 1131:. 1127:. 1104:. 1096:. 1084:10 1082:. 1078:. 1055:. 1045:. 1011:. 938:. 918:. 886:. 868:. 864:. 838:. 802:. 784:. 762:. 728:. 706:. 687:. 614:. 593:, 312:)) 300:^^ 127:a 114:, 1616:e 1609:t 1602:v 1543:. 1522:. 1499:. 1488:: 1478:3 1458:. 1447:: 1437:3 1411:. 1405:: 1397:: 1273:. 1255:. 1249:: 1243:8 1222:. 1216:: 1208:: 1198:: 1171:. 1153:. 1147:: 1139:: 1133:8 1112:. 1100:: 1090:: 1063:. 1041:: 1022:. 996:. 971:. 924:. 903:. 880:: 806:. 788:. 691:. 365:. 315:} 306:: 294:, 288:( 282:: 276:( 270:. 261:: 252:{ 237:: 225:: 94:/

Index

geospatial
linked data
Semantic Web
Open Geospatial Consortium
RDF
SPARQL
Ordnance Survey
OWL
LinkedGeoData
University of Leipzig
DBpedia
OpenStreetMap
topological
ontology
RDFS
OWL
Geography Markup Language
well-known text representation of geometry
Simple Features
RCC8
DE-9IM
SPARQL
Rule Interchange Format
38°54′49″N 77°05′20″W / 38.913574°N 77.089005°W / 38.913574; -77.089005
38°53′11″N 77°01′48″W / 38.886321°N 77.029953°W / 38.886321; -77.029953
RCC8
A graphical representation of Region Connection Calculus (RCC: Randell, Cui and Cohn, 1992) and the links to the equivalent naming by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) with their equivalent URIs.
Apache Marmotta
Google Summer of Code
PostGIS

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.