88:. Under Kansas state law, statutory rape charges involving minors were greatly reduced if both parties were teenagers with few years between them. However, the law specifically excluded same-sex sexual conduct. Limon, 18 years old at the time, had performed oral sex on a 14-year-old boy with his consent, which is defined by Kansas law as rape regardless of consent from the 14-year-old. Because they were both male, the statute minimizing Limon's sentence did not apply. He was sentenced to over a decade longer in prison than if it were opposite-sex sexual conduct. When Limon challenged the law, both a trial court and the
418:
1052:
1064:
1041:
66:; the Supreme Court simply sends the case back to the lower court to be reconsidered in light of the new law or the new precedent. GVR orders are designed to be efficient and thus are not full explications of the law, and have no precedential effect. GVR orders are usually not explained with lengthy opinions.
119:
case on which the Kansas courts had relied; it held that state laws forbidding consensual sex between two people of the same sex are unconstitutional. In light of this, on June 27, the
Supreme Court granted Limon's petition, vacated the ruling of the Kansas Court of Appeals, and remanded the case for
61:
the case for further proceedings. An order of this sort is typically appropriate when there has been a change in legal circumstances subsequent to the lower court or agency's decision, such as a change in the law, a precedential ruling, or a
719:
120:
further consideration. After the Court of
Appeals again upheld the law, the Kansas Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and unanimously struck down the part of the law excluding same-sex sexual conduct.
858:
758:
709:
753:
972:
898:
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
407:
724:
746:
729:
995:
960:
844:
734:
183:"Deciding Not to Decide: The Supreme Court's Expanding Use of the GVR Power Continued in Thomas v. American Home Products, Inc. and Department of the Interior v. South Dakota"
854:
741:
402:
503:
714:
397:
221:
426:
132:
75:
849:
248:
967:
581:
337:
292:
204:
955:
827:
704:
1000:
1089:
369:
17:
553:
832:
392:
1005:
977:
1026:
796:
916:
490:
454:
378:
39:
157:
1044:
362:
924:
434:
102:
refused to hear the case, Limon filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002.
929:
990:
791:
449:
355:
934:
801:
57:
308:"Why the Supreme Court Should Stop GVR'ing the Solicitor General's Rationale-Confessions-of-Error"
89:
69:
In 1996, the
Supreme Court discussed the appropriateness of GVR orders and upheld their use in a
307:
1011:
811:
806:
786:
776:
543:
331:
286:
225:
198:
1056:
837:
637:
99:
8:
1018:
781:
471:
63:
939:
228:
94:
262:
43:
538:
442:
347:
319:
274:
107:
182:
51:
679:
601:
561:
533:
518:
508:
607:
595:
571:
242:
123:
GVR orders have been the subject of substantial legal attention and criticism.
83:
1083:
685:
466:
323:
278:
137:
673:
667:
661:
649:
631:
566:
528:
513:
495:
982:
655:
625:
619:
613:
523:
1068:
643:
589:
1063:
82:
An example of the
Supreme Court issuing a GVR order is the case of
92:
upheld the law, relying in part on the 1986 US Supreme Court case
263:"The Supreme Court's Controversial GVRs - And an Alternative"
377:
133:
Procedures of the
Supreme Court of the United States
1081:
158:"Glossary of Supreme Court terms - SCOTUSblog"
363:
996:Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court
336:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
291:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
203:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
105:On June 26, 2003, the Supreme Court decided
370:
356:
455:Cert. dismissed as improvidently granted
180:
978:Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937
935:Old Supreme Court Chamber, U.S. Capitol
14:
1082:
797:Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837
351:
55:the decision of the court below, and
38:) is a type of order issued by the
24:
1090:Supreme Court of the United States
379:Supreme Court of the United States
305:
260:
42:in which the Court simultaneously
40:Supreme Court of the United States
27:Order issued by U.S. Supreme Court
25:
1101:
181:Mitchell, Armbruster, J. (1998).
1062:
1050:
1040:
1039:
940:Old Senate Chamber, U.S. Capitol
416:
261:P., Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew (2009).
1027:United States Solicitor General
754:Justices who served in Congress
312:Case Western Reserve Law Review
956:Article III, U.S. Constitution
299:
254:
234:
211:
174:
150:
13:
1:
925:Royal Exchange, New York City
807:Judicial Circuits Act of 1866
143:
973:Code of Conduct for Justices
7:
991:Impeachment of Samuel Chase
930:Old City Hall, Philadelphia
792:Seventh Circuit Act of 1807
408:Nomination and confirmation
126:
18:Grant, vacate, remand order
10:
1106:
414:
1035:
948:
909:
820:
802:Tenth Circuit Act of 1863
767:
759:Burial places of justices
695:
580:
552:
482:
425:
385:
306:M., Murray, John (2012).
187:North Carolina Law Review
47:a petition for certiorari
1057:United States portal
1001:Supreme Court in fiction
251: (October 21, 2005).
90:Kansas Court of Appeals
917:Supreme Court Building
1012:United States Reports
961:original jurisdiction
845:Reporter of Decisions
812:Judiciary Act of 1869
787:Judiciary Act of 1802
782:Judiciary Act of 1801
777:Judiciary Act of 1789
544:Ketanji Brown Jackson
460:Grant, vacate, remand
450:Cert. before judgment
32:grant, vacate, remand
838:Supreme Court Police
403:Ideological leanings
249:280 Kan. 275
100:Kansas Supreme Court
73:opinion in the case
1006:Supreme Court leaks
472:In-chambers opinion
267:Michigan Law Review
64:confession of error
768:Statutes affecting
710:Associate justices
504:Associate justices
398:Court demographics
218:Lawrence v. Chater
95:Bowers v. Hardwick
76:Lawrence v. Chater
1077:
1076:
696:Lists of justices
539:Amy Coney Barrett
108:Lawrence v. Texas
16:(Redirected from
1097:
1067:
1066:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1043:
1042:
1019:Lawyers' Edition
554:Retired justices
420:
419:
372:
365:
358:
349:
348:
342:
341:
335:
327:
303:
297:
296:
290:
282:
258:
252:
246:
238:
232:
215:
209:
208:
202:
194:
178:
172:
171:
169:
168:
154:
21:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1073:
1061:
1051:
1049:
1045:Other countries
1031:
944:
905:
816:
769:
763:
742:All nominations
697:
691:
680:Rehnquist Court
602:Ellsworth Court
576:
562:Anthony Kennedy
548:
534:Brett Kavanaugh
519:Sonia Sotomayor
509:Clarence Thomas
483:Current members
478:
421:
417:
412:
381:
376:
346:
345:
329:
328:
304:
300:
284:
283:
259:
255:
240:
239:
235:
216:
212:
196:
195:
179:
175:
166:
164:
156:
155:
151:
146:
129:
85:Kansas v. Limon
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1103:
1093:
1092:
1075:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1069:Law portal
1059:
1047:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
980:
975:
970:
965:
964:
963:
952:
950:
946:
945:
943:
942:
937:
932:
927:
920:
919:
913:
911:
907:
906:
904:
903:
902:
901:
896:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
847:
842:
841:
840:
830:
824:
822:
818:
817:
815:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
773:
771:
765:
764:
762:
761:
756:
751:
750:
749:
739:
738:
737:
735:time in office
732:
727:
722:
712:
707:
705:Chief justices
701:
699:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:(2005–present)
683:
677:
671:
665:
659:
653:
647:
641:
635:
629:
623:
617:
611:
608:Marshall Court
605:
599:
596:Rutledge Court
593:
586:
584:
578:
577:
575:
574:
572:Stephen Breyer
569:
564:
558:
556:
550:
549:
547:
546:
541:
536:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
499:
498:
486:
484:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
474:
464:
463:
462:
457:
452:
440:
431:
429:
423:
422:
415:
413:
411:
410:
405:
400:
395:
393:Lists of cases
389:
387:
383:
382:
375:
374:
367:
360:
352:
344:
343:
298:
253:
243:State v. Limon
233:
210:
173:
148:
147:
145:
142:
141:
140:
135:
128:
125:
115:overruled the
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1102:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1058:
1048:
1046:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
985:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
968:Camera policy
966:
962:
959:
958:
957:
954:
953:
951:
947:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
922:
921:
918:
915:
914:
912:
908:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
859:Chief Justice
856:
853:
852:
851:
848:
846:
843:
839:
836:
835:
834:
831:
829:
826:
825:
823:
821:Functionaries
819:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
774:
772:
766:
760:
757:
755:
752:
748:
745:
744:
743:
740:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
717:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
702:
700:
694:
687:
686:Roberts Court
684:
681:
678:
675:
672:
669:
666:
663:
660:
657:
654:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
627:
624:
621:
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
587:
585:
583:
579:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
559:
557:
555:
551:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
501:
500:
497:
494:
492:
491:Chief justice
488:
487:
485:
481:
473:
470:
469:
468:
467:Shadow docket
465:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
447:
446:
445:
441:
439:
437:
436:Amicus curiae
433:
432:
430:
428:
424:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
388:
384:
380:
373:
368:
366:
361:
359:
354:
353:
350:
339:
333:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
302:
294:
288:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
257:
250:
245:
244:
237:
230:
227:
223:
219:
214:
206:
200:
192:
188:
184:
177:
163:
159:
153:
149:
139:
138:Shadow docket
136:
134:
131:
130:
124:
121:
118:
114:
110:
109:
103:
101:
97:
96:
91:
87:
86:
80:
78:
77:
72:
67:
65:
60:
59:
54:
53:
48:
46:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1017:
1010:
983:
747:unsuccessful
715:All justices
698:and nominees
674:Burger Court
668:Warren Court
662:Vinson Court
650:Hughes Court
632:Fuller Court
567:David Souter
529:Neil Gorsuch
514:Samuel Alito
502:
496:John Roberts
489:
459:
443:
435:
332:cite journal
315:
311:
301:
287:cite journal
270:
266:
256:
241:
236:
231: (1996).
217:
213:
199:cite journal
190:
186:
176:
165:. Retrieved
161:
152:
122:
116:
112:
106:
104:
93:
84:
81:
74:
70:
68:
56:
50:
44:
35:
31:
29:
682:(1986–2005)
676:(1969–1986)
670:(1953–1969)
664:(1946–1953)
658:(1941–1946)
656:Stone Court
652:(1930–1941)
646:(1921–1930)
640:(1910–1921)
638:White Court
634:(1888–1910)
628:(1874–1888)
626:Waite Court
622:(1864–1873)
620:Chase Court
616:(1836–1864)
614:Taney Court
610:(1801–1835)
604:(1796–1800)
592:(1789–1795)
524:Elena Kagan
98:. When the
770:court size
644:Taft Court
444:Certiorari
427:Procedures
167:2018-07-06
162:SCOTUSblog
144:References
71:per curiam
850:Law clerk
725:education
590:Jay Court
386:The court
324:0008-7262
279:0026-2234
1084:Category
923:Former:
910:Location
127:See also
113:Lawrence
984:Lochner
949:Related
899:Seat 10
833:Marshal
582:History
58:remands
52:vacates
894:Seat 9
889:Seat 8
884:Seat 6
879:Seat 4
874:Seat 3
869:Seat 2
864:Seat 1
598:(1795)
322:
277:
247:,
220:,
117:Bowers
45:grants
855:lists
828:Clerk
720:court
438:brief
318:(3).
273:(5).
224:
730:seat
338:link
320:ISSN
293:link
275:ISSN
226:U.S.
205:link
193:(4).
986:era
271:107
229:163
222:516
36:GVR
1086::
857::
334:}}
330:{{
316:62
314:.
310:.
289:}}
285:{{
269:.
265:.
201:}}
197:{{
191:76
189:.
185:.
160:.
111:.
79:.
49:,
30:A
506::
493::
371:e
364:t
357:v
340:)
326:.
295:)
281:.
207:)
170:.
34:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.