Knowledge

Hawk/goose effect

Source 📝

77:’s 1951 experiment the same figure is used to represent both the hawk and the goose in most hawk/goose experiments. When moving the figure in one direction, it represents a shape resembling a hawk (short neck long tail) while moving the figure in the opposite direction resembles a goose (long neck short tail). The perceived identity influences how the figure is perceived to move, such that the figure is assumed to be a hawk or a goose based on the movement in direction of the head and the protrusion of the wings (short on one end and a long one on the other). 155:
of fear and controlled for learned behavior by maintaining the ducklings in a brooder until they were transported to their laboratory in opaque containers and in 1982, Elizabeth L. Moore and Helmut C. Mueller found that a chick's heart rate was of greater variance in response to the hawk model without prior, pertinent experience, suggesting a greater innate fear response to the hawk over the goose. Obvious behavioral responses to fear were not identified.
48: 57:
response. Later Tinbergen reported that a single shape that was sort of an abstract composite of the hawk and goose silhouettes could produce the effect if moved in one direction but not the other. A study later confirmed that perception of an object was influenced by the direction of motion because the object in question was considered to be moving forwards in that direction. Initially thought to be an inborn
154:
short neck hypothesis with some as recent as the 1980s such as Helmut C. Mueller and Patricia G. Parker, in 1980, demonstrated that naive mallard ducklings shows a greater variance in heart rate to the hawk models over the goose models. They concluded that cardiac response is an excellent measurement
56:
As part of their introducing experimentalism into animal behavior research they performed experiments in which they made 2-dimensional silhouettes of various bird-like shapes and moved them across the young birds' line of vision. Goose-like shapes were ignored while hawk-like shapes produced the
31:
refers to a behavior observed in some young birds when another bird flies above them: if the flying bird is a goose, the young birds show no reaction, but if the flying bird is a hawk, the young birds either become more agitated or cower to reduce the danger. The observation that short-necked and
190:
hypothesis could not be replicated in ducklings and in an attempt to replicate Tinbergen's experiments, Schleit's, in 1961 believed Tinbergen falsified his data. Like the experiments that still support Tinbergan's short neck hypothesis, there are many experiments that do not
146:
continued to report on what he described as innate behavior and stated that goslings display a fear response when an ambiguous goose-hawk figure was moved in the "hawk" direction, implying that goslings associate a particular shape with a particular direction of motion.
1221: 291:’s predisposition hypothesis and present a fear response to the hawk-shaped object in the hawk/goose model. Schleidt used 5 bronze turkeys that were raised indoors with no windows. Schleidt’s results again, supported the “selective 259:
pointed out that all other species presented alarm responses (fixating, alarm calling and marching off to cover), regardless of the model used and that “slow relative speed” of a flying object can elicit an anti-predator response.
51:
One of the goose/hawk models as reported by Tinbergen. Moving it from right to left (in the direction of dashed arrow) produced no response, but moving it from left to right (in the direction of solid arrow) elicited the
279:’s experiments using, free-ranging geese, ducks, and turkeys and found that regardless of the shape, these birds presented a fear response that diminished over a number of trials, pointing to the likelihood of 94:
exhibited a greater fear response to a silhouette of a hawk than to a circle, a triangle, or a generalized bird silhouette, but that this varied with both species, and prior experience.
287:’s “slow relative speed” findings. A second experiment was performed by Schleidt in 1961 to determine if turkeys, who have never been exposed to a flying object, would support 1213: 652:
Schleidt, Wolfgang; Shalter, Michael D.; Moura-Neto, Humberto (May 2011). "The hawk/goose story: the classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited".
1143: 1237: 158:
Most ethologists today believe that the behaviors elicited by the hawk/goose modals are socially reinforced or are more likely to support the Schleit's “selective
1011: 1229: 36:. Friedrich Goethe conducted experiments with silhouettes to examine alarm reactions in 1937 and a more systematic study was conducted in the same year by 842: 466:
Schleidt, W; Shalter, MD; Moura-Neto, H (2011). "The Hawk/Goose Story:The Classical Ethological Experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, Revisited".
233:
designed silhouettes that could represent a hawk like figure if moved in one direction, or a goose like figure if moved in the other direction.
1181: 268:
published their original findings separately in 1939. Re-examination of the experiments were invoked due to the differences in results.
102:'s observations in which he stated that domestic chickens are more alarmed by short necked birds, over long necks ones. This provoked 1043: 225:’s hypothesis that domestic chickens showed the greatest amount of fear towards long tailed, short necked birds flying overhead, 724:
Mueller, Helmut C.; Parker, Patricia G. (1980). "Naive Ducklings Show Different Cardiac Response To Hawk Than To Goose Models".
539:
Bernstein, L. J.; Cooper, L. A. (June 1997). "Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures".
1341: 896:
Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $ 7.00".
602:
Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $ 7.00".
501:
Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $ 7.00".
431:
Bernstein, Lori J.; Cooper, Lynn A. (1997). "Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures".
365: 1120: 1148: 1174: 980:
Schleidt, W. M. (1961). "Reaktionen von Truthühnern auf fliegende Raubvögel und Versuche zur Analyse ihres AAM's".
807:
Hirsch, J., Lindley, R. H., & Tolman, E. C. (1955). "An experimental test of an alleged innate sign stimulus".
756:
Moore, E. L.; Mueller, H. C. (September 1982). "Cardiac response of domestic chickens to hawk and goose models".
1138: 214:
worked on two projects, an experimental analysis of egg-rolling behavior in the greylag goose, supporting the
1295: 1088: 218:
hypothesis, and the responses of various young birds to cardboard models of raptors and other flying birds.
856:
McNiven, M. (1960). ""Social releaser mechanism" in birds–a controlled replication of Tinbergen's study".
90:
Friedrich Goethe was the first to perform experiments using silhouettes (1937, 1940). He found that naive
1167: 1036: 295:
hypothesis,” and not innate behavior. Thus, the short neck hypothesis appears to have been falsified by
383:"The hawk/goose story: The classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited" 382: 1372: 1029: 582:
Goethe, Friedrich (1937). "Beobachtungen und Erfahrungen bei Aufzucht von deutschem Auerwild".
1012:
The hawk/goose story: The classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited
1205: 836: 355: 1367: 1290: 1066: 943: 318:
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Zoologischer Anzeiger, Supplementband
215: 91: 704:
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Zoologischer Anzeiger Supplementband
8: 1270: 1260: 255:
noted that the shape of the model did not seem to matter for all species except turkeys.
142:‘short neck’ among others”. Tinbergen published 2 papers in 1948 on the subject. In 1951 947: 934:
Schleidt, W. M. (1961). "Über die Auslösung der Flucht vor Raubvögeln bei Truthühnern".
271:
In 1955, Hirsch et al. presented that Tinbergen's hypothesis could not be replicated in
1265: 1190: 993: 959: 873: 789: 296: 288: 276: 265: 244: 234: 226: 207: 203: 187: 179: 175: 151: 143: 131: 123: 115: 107: 95: 74: 41: 24: 1362: 1112: 913: 877: 824: 781: 773: 769: 677: 669: 619: 564: 556: 518: 483: 448: 413: 405: 361: 62: 793: 118:
worked together in 1937 on experiments that were each published separately in 1939.
1255: 989: 963: 951: 909: 905: 865: 816: 765: 733: 661: 615: 611: 548: 514: 510: 475: 440: 397: 241:
moved the models overhead of varies species of birds and recorded their responses.
1331: 1326: 272: 183: 65:, it was subsequently shown by others to be socially reinforced by other birds. 1336: 1316: 806: 552: 444: 248: 222: 99: 33: 1356: 1321: 1311: 1275: 1104: 1096: 1052: 917: 777: 673: 623: 560: 522: 409: 284: 261: 256: 252: 238: 230: 211: 199: 171: 139: 127: 119: 111: 103: 37: 737: 1280: 828: 785: 681: 487: 417: 130:
arguing that a short neck only elicits a flight response in turkeys, while
568: 452: 292: 280: 159: 135: 16:
Behavior observed in some young birds when another bird flies above them
955: 869: 68: 47: 381:
Schleidt, Wolfgang; Shalter, Michael D.; Moura-Neto, Humberto (2011).
1159: 820: 665: 479: 401: 138:
birds, ducks, and geese to a flying bird of prey are released by the
541:
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
433:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
335:
Tinbergen, Nikolaas (1939). "Why do birds behave as they do? (II)".
58: 20: 1222:
Social Behaviour in Animals: With Special Reference to Vertebrates
1010:
Schleidt, Wolfgang; Shalter, Michael D.; and Moura-Neto Humberto."
1021: 44:
which is considered one of the classic experiments of ethology.
1144:
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research
702:
Lorenz, Konrad (1939). "Vergleichende verhaltensforschung".
316:
Lorenz, Konrad (1939). "Vergleichende verhaltensforschung".
32:
long-tailed birds flying overhead caused alarm was noted by
651: 465: 380: 150:
There have been a number of other studies supporting
69:
Hawk or goose distinguished by direction of movement
809:
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
206:in 1936 at the Leiden Instinct Symposium. In 1937, 353: 1354: 110:'s to design and explore the Hawk/Goose effect. 979: 933: 538: 430: 126:reported differences in their experiments with 98:, in 1951, pointed out that he was inspired by 275:. Schleidt, in 1961 did his best to replicate 80: 1175: 1037: 723: 841:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 755: 166:A Brief History Pointing to Learned Behavior 855: 170:After discrepancies between the results of 86:A Brief History Pointing to Innate Behavior 1342:1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1182: 1168: 1044: 1030: 895: 601: 500: 334: 283:. Schleidt did find evidence to support 178:, Hirsch et al. in 1955, concluded that 46: 1355: 1189: 891: 889: 887: 751: 749: 747: 701: 697: 695: 693: 691: 647: 645: 643: 641: 639: 637: 635: 633: 597: 595: 593: 581: 315: 247:believed that these experiments prove 182:hypothesis could not be replicated in 1163: 1025: 975: 973: 929: 927: 719: 717: 534: 532: 1149:Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology 884: 744: 688: 630: 590: 13: 1004: 994:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1961.tb00241.x 970: 924: 714: 14: 1384: 1121:Civilized Man's Eight Deadly Sins 1051: 1016:Journal of Comparative Psychology 654:Journal of Comparative Psychology 529: 494: 390:Journal of Comparative Psychology 357:The Psychology of Fear and Stress 186:In 1960, McNiven, concluded that 134:claimed: “The reactions of young 982:Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 849: 800: 1139:Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle 910:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a 616:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a 575: 515:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a 459: 424: 374: 347: 328: 309: 194: 1: 302: 770:10.1016/0376-6357(82)90040-7 7: 81:Innate or learned behaviour 10: 1389: 1296:Tinbergen's four questions 553:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.721 445:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.721 360:. CUP Archive. p. 7. 354:Jeffrey Alan Gray (1987). 73:Just like what is seen in 1304: 1248: 1197: 1131: 1080: 1059: 1256:Animal behaviour science 1214:The Herring Gull's World 1018:, 125(2):121–133, 2011. 936:Die Naturwissenschaften 738:10.1163/156853980x00339 1238:The Riddle of the Rook 584:Deutsche Jagd, 6 and 7 53: 1206:The Study of Instinct 758:Behavioural Processes 50: 1291:Supernormal stimulus 1230:Signals for Survival 1067:Fixed action pattern 858:Psychological Record 216:fixed action pattern 1271:History of ethology 1261:Behavioural biology 1089:King Solomon's Ring 948:1961NW.....48..141S 1266:Behavioral ecology 1191:Nikolaas Tinbergen 956:10.1007/BF00631948 870:10.1007/BF03393371 251:’s hypothesis but 204:Nikolaas Tinbergen 176:Nikolaas Tinbergen 116:Nikolaas Tinbergen 108:Nikolaas Tinbergen 54: 42:Nikolaas Tinbergen 25:cognitive ethology 1350: 1349: 1286:Hawk/goose effect 1157: 1156: 1113:Behind the Mirror 1072:Hawk/goose effect 904:(2990): 438–439. 610:(2990): 438–439. 509:(2990): 438–439. 367:978-0-521-27098-4 63:natural selection 29:hawk/goose effect 1380: 1184: 1177: 1170: 1161: 1160: 1046: 1039: 1032: 1023: 1022: 998: 997: 977: 968: 967: 931: 922: 921: 893: 882: 881: 853: 847: 846: 840: 832: 821:10.1037/h0048908 804: 798: 797: 753: 742: 741: 721: 712: 711: 699: 686: 685: 666:10.1037/a0022068 649: 628: 627: 599: 588: 587: 579: 573: 572: 536: 527: 526: 498: 492: 491: 480:10.1037/a0022068 463: 457: 456: 428: 422: 421: 402:10.1037/a0022068 387: 378: 372: 371: 351: 345: 344: 332: 326: 325: 313: 273:Leghorn Chickens 184:Leghorn Chickens 1388: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1332:Richard Dawkins 1327:Karl von Frisch 1300: 1244: 1193: 1188: 1158: 1153: 1127: 1076: 1055: 1050: 1007: 1005:Further reading 1002: 1001: 978: 971: 932: 925: 894: 885: 854: 850: 834: 833: 805: 801: 754: 745: 722: 715: 700: 689: 650: 631: 600: 591: 580: 576: 537: 530: 499: 495: 464: 460: 429: 425: 385: 379: 375: 368: 352: 348: 333: 329: 314: 310: 305: 197: 83: 71: 61:developed from 17: 12: 11: 5: 1386: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1337:Desmond Morris 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1317:Luuk Tinbergen 1314: 1308: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1299: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1258: 1252: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1243: 1242: 1234: 1226: 1218: 1210: 1201: 1199: 1198:Selected works 1195: 1194: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1172: 1164: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1125: 1117: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1063: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1049: 1048: 1041: 1034: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 988:(5): 534–560. 969: 942:(5): 141–142. 923: 883: 864:(4): 259–265. 848: 815:(4): 278–280. 799: 764:(3): 255–258. 743: 732:(1): 101–112. 713: 687: 660:(2): 121–133. 629: 589: 574: 547:(3): 721–737. 528: 493: 474:(2): 121–133. 468:J Comp Psychol 458: 439:(3): 721–737. 423: 396:(2): 121–133. 373: 366: 346: 327: 307: 306: 304: 301: 223:Oscar Heinroth 196: 193: 100:Oscar Heinroth 82: 79: 70: 67: 34:Oskar Heinroth 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1385: 1374: 1373:Konrad Lorenz 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1358: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1322:Konrad Lorenz 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1312:Jan Tinbergen 1310: 1309: 1307: 1303: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1276:Neuroethology 1274: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1262: 1259: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1180: 1178: 1173: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105:On Aggression 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097:Man Meets Dog 1094: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1053:Konrad Lorenz 1047: 1042: 1040: 1035: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 995: 991: 987: 983: 976: 974: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 930: 928: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 892: 890: 888: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 852: 844: 838: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 803: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 752: 750: 748: 739: 735: 731: 727: 720: 718: 709: 705: 698: 696: 694: 692: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 648: 646: 644: 642: 640: 638: 636: 634: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 598: 596: 594: 585: 578: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 535: 533: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 497: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 462: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 427: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 384: 377: 369: 363: 359: 358: 350: 342: 338: 331: 323: 319: 312: 308: 300: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 267: 263: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 219: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 200:Konrad Lorenz 192: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172:Konrad Lorenz 168: 167: 163: 162:hypothesis". 161: 156: 153: 148: 145: 141: 140:sign-stimulus 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112:Konrad Lorenz 109: 105: 104:Konrad Lorenz 101: 97: 93: 88: 87: 78: 76: 66: 64: 60: 49: 45: 43: 39: 38:Konrad Lorenz 35: 30: 26: 22: 1285: 1281:Sociobiology 1236: 1228: 1220: 1212: 1204: 1132:Institutions 1119: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1071: 1015: 985: 981: 939: 935: 901: 897: 861: 857: 851: 837:cite journal 812: 808: 802: 761: 757: 729: 725: 707: 703: 657: 653: 607: 603: 583: 577: 544: 540: 506: 502: 496: 471: 467: 461: 436: 432: 426: 393: 389: 376: 356: 349: 340: 336: 330: 321: 317: 311: 270: 243: 220: 198: 169: 165: 164: 157: 149: 136:gallinaceous 92:Capercaillie 89: 85: 84: 72: 55: 28: 18: 1368:Ornithology 293:habituation 281:habituation 195:Controversy 188:Tinbergen's 180:Tinbergen's 160:habituation 152:Tinbergen's 1357:Categories 303:References 918:0036-8075 878:149300719 778:0376-6357 726:Behaviour 710:: 69–102. 674:1939-2087 624:0036-8075 561:0096-1523 523:0036-8075 410:1939-2087 337:Bird-Lore 324:: 69–102. 297:Tinbergen 289:Tinbergen 277:Tinbergen 266:Tinbergen 245:Tinbergen 235:Tinbergen 227:Tinbergen 221:Based on 208:Tinbergen 144:Tinbergen 132:Tinbergen 124:Tinbergen 96:Tinbergen 75:Tinbergen 52:behavior. 1363:Ethology 1060:Concepts 829:13252157 794:12357713 786:24923185 682:21341906 488:21341906 418:21341906 343:: 23–30. 249:Heinroth 59:instinct 21:ethology 1305:Related 1249:General 964:9335023 944:Bibcode 898:Science 604:Science 569:9180041 503:Science 453:9180041 106:'s and 1241:(film) 1233:(film) 1225:(book) 1217:(book) 1209:(book) 1124:(1973) 1116:(1973) 1108:(1963) 1100:(1949) 1092:(1949) 962:  916:  876:  827:  792:  784:  776:  680:  672:  622:  567:  559:  521:  486:  451:  416:  408:  364:  285:Lorenz 262:Lorenz 257:Lorenz 253:Lorenz 239:Lorenz 231:Lorenz 212:Lorenz 128:Lorenz 120:Lorenz 27:, the 1081:Works 960:S2CID 874:S2CID 790:S2CID 386:(PDF) 914:ISSN 843:link 825:PMID 782:PMID 774:ISSN 678:PMID 670:ISSN 620:ISSN 565:PMID 557:ISSN 519:ISSN 484:PMID 449:PMID 414:PMID 406:ISSN 362:ISBN 264:and 237:and 229:and 210:and 202:met 174:and 122:and 114:and 40:and 23:and 1014:." 990:doi 952:doi 906:doi 902:115 866:doi 817:doi 766:doi 734:doi 662:doi 658:125 612:doi 608:115 549:doi 511:doi 507:115 476:doi 472:125 441:doi 398:doi 394:125 19:In 1359:: 986:18 984:. 972:^ 958:. 950:. 940:48 938:. 926:^ 912:. 900:. 886:^ 872:. 862:10 860:. 839:}} 835:{{ 823:. 813:48 811:. 788:. 780:. 772:. 760:. 746:^ 730:74 728:. 716:^ 708:12 706:. 690:^ 676:. 668:. 656:. 632:^ 618:. 606:. 592:^ 563:. 555:. 545:23 543:. 531:^ 517:. 505:. 482:. 470:. 447:. 437:23 435:. 412:. 404:. 392:. 388:. 341:41 339:. 322:12 320:. 299:. 1183:e 1176:t 1169:v 1045:e 1038:t 1031:v 996:. 992:: 966:. 954:: 946:: 920:. 908:: 880:. 868:: 845:) 831:. 819:: 796:. 768:: 762:7 740:. 736:: 684:. 664:: 626:. 614:: 586:. 571:. 551:: 525:. 513:: 490:. 478:: 455:. 443:: 420:. 400:: 370:.

Index

ethology
cognitive ethology
Oskar Heinroth
Konrad Lorenz
Nikolaas Tinbergen

instinct
natural selection
Tinbergen
Capercaillie
Tinbergen
Oscar Heinroth
Konrad Lorenz
Nikolaas Tinbergen
Konrad Lorenz
Nikolaas Tinbergen
Lorenz
Tinbergen
Lorenz
Tinbergen
gallinaceous
sign-stimulus
Tinbergen
Tinbergen's
habituation
Konrad Lorenz
Nikolaas Tinbergen
Tinbergen's
Leghorn Chickens
Tinbergen's

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.