203:
209:
121:
In essence, the
Supreme Court was ruling that "the language guarantees set forth in the Constitution represented a minimum protection and did not stop Parliament or the provincial legislatures from adopting more generous language regimes."
101:, which made both French and English the official languages of the institutions of the federal government. Jones argued that the subject matter of the law fell outside the constitutional jurisdiction of the federal government.
108:, finding that the subject matter of the law related to the administration of Parliamentary institutions and therefore was within the authority of the federal government under the
132:
150:
131:, the Supreme Court stated that the principle that elected governments can enhance language rights, had been constitutionalized in 1982 under the terms of
127:
252:
137:
276:
271:
286:
109:
281:
97:
245:
296:
291:
92:
226:
238:
84:
114:
88:
8:
72:
The
Official Languages Act was within the federal government's constitutional authority
222:
265:
218:
202:
151:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court)
104:
The Court upheld the constitutional validity of the
83:(1974), 2 S.C.R. 182 is a leading decision of the
263:
87:on the protection of language rights under the
183:Société des Acadiens v. Association of Parents
128:Société des Acadiens v. Association of Parents
246:
168:Canada. Commissioner of Official Languages.
253:
239:
16:Judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada
138:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
264:
196:
13:
14:
308:
207:
201:
110:peace, order and good government
54:Leonard Jones, Mayor of Moncton
175:
162:
46:New Brunswick Attorney General
1:
277:Supreme Court of Canada cases
156:
272:Canadian federalism case law
225:. You can help Knowledge by
7:
144:
10:
313:
195:
80:Jones v New Brunswick (AG)
22:Jones v New Brunswick (AG)
287:1974 in Canadian case law
95:, challenged the federal
71:
66:
58:
50:
42:
34:
26:
21:
91:. The Mayor of Moncton,
170:Annual Report 2008-2009
85:Supreme Court of Canada
30:Supreme Court of Canada
282:Bilingualism in Canada
125:In its 1986 ruling in
115:Constitution Act, 1867
106:Official Languages Act
98:Official Languages Act
89:Canadian Constitution
217:This article about
297:Canadian law stubs
292:Language case law
234:
233:
76:
75:
304:
255:
248:
241:
213:
212:
211:
210:
205:
197:
186:
185:, 1 S.C.R. 549.
179:
173:
166:
19:
18:
312:
311:
307:
306:
305:
303:
302:
301:
262:
261:
260:
259:
208:
206:
200:
193:
189:
180:
176:
167:
163:
159:
147:
17:
12:
11:
5:
310:
300:
299:
294:
289:
284:
279:
274:
258:
257:
250:
243:
235:
232:
231:
214:
188:
187:
174:
160:
158:
155:
154:
153:
146:
143:
74:
73:
69:
68:
64:
63:
60:
56:
55:
52:
48:
47:
44:
40:
39:
36:
32:
31:
28:
24:
23:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
309:
298:
295:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
269:
267:
256:
251:
249:
244:
242:
237:
236:
230:
228:
224:
220:
215:
204:
199:
198:
194:
191:
184:
178:
171:
165:
161:
152:
149:
148:
142:
140:
139:
134:
133:section 16(3)
130:
129:
123:
119:
117:
116:
112:power of the
111:
107:
102:
100:
99:
94:
93:Leonard Jones
90:
86:
82:
81:
70:
67:Case opinions
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
20:
227:expanding it
219:Canadian law
216:
192:
190:
182:
177:
169:
164:
136:
126:
124:
120:
113:
105:
103:
96:
79:
78:
77:
62:2 S.C.R. 182
38:2 S.C.R. 182
181:Beetz, J.,
266:Categories
157:References
51:Plaintiffs
43:Defendant
145:See also
59:Citation
172:, p. 4.
135:of the
35:Decided
221:is a
27:Court
223:stub
268::
141:.
118:.
254:e
247:t
240:v
229:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.svg){kind=small}