65:, in his treatment of the practical difficulties at that time of implementing LR(1) parsers. He showed that the LALR parser has more language recognition power than the LR(0) parser, while requiring the same number of states as the LR(0) parser for a language that can be recognized by both parsers. This makes the LALR parser a memory-efficient alternative to the LR(1) parser for languages that are LALR. It was also proven that there exist LR(1) languages that are not LALR. Despite this weakness, the power of the LALR parser is sufficient for many mainstream computer languages, including
76:
The original dissertation gave no algorithm for constructing such a parser given a formal grammar. The first algorithms for LALR parser generation were published in 1973. In 1982, DeRemer and Tom
Pennello published an algorithm that generated highly memory-efficient LALR parsers. LALR parsers can be
134:(SLR) that had much lower memory requirements at the cost of less language-recognition power, with the LALR parser being the most-powerful alternative. In 1977, memory optimizations for the LR parser were invented but still the LR parser was less memory-efficient than the simplified alternatives.
346:
Depending on the presence of empty derivations, a LL(1) grammar can be equal to a SLR(1) or a LALR(1) grammar. If the LL(1) grammar has no empty derivations it is SLR(1) and if all symbols with empty derivations have non-empty derivations it is LALR(1). If symbols having only an empty derivation
245:
An LR(1) parser will create two different states (with non-conflicting lookaheads), neither of which is ambiguous. In an LALR parser this one state has conflicting actions (given lookahead c or d, reduce to E or F), a "reduce/reduce conflict"; the above grammar will be declared ambiguous by a
149:
Generally, the LALR parser refers to the LALR(1) parser, just as the LR parser generally refers to the LR(1) parser. The "(1)" denotes one-token lookahead, to resolve differences between rule patterns during parsing. Similarly, there is an LALR(2) parser with two-token lookahead, and
226:, because during the LR(0) state-construction process the lookaheads are not known. This reduces the power of the parser because not knowing the lookahead symbols can confuse the parser as to which grammar rule to pick next, resulting in
158:-token lookup, but these are rare in actual use. The LALR parser is based on the LR(0) parser, so it can also be denoted LALR(1) = LA(1)LR(0) (1 token of lookahead, LR(0)) or more generally LALR(
230:. All conflicts that arise in applying a LALR(1) parser to an unambiguous LR(1) grammar are reduce/reduce conflicts. The SLR(1) parser performs further merging, which introduces additional conflicts.
253:
To recover, this ambiguity is resolved by choosing E, because it occurs before F in the grammar. However, the resultant parser will not be able to recognize the valid input sequence
31:) is part of the compiling process where human readable text is converted into a structured representation to be read by computers. An LALR parser is a software tool to process (
774:
341:
239:
In the LALR table construction, two states will be merged into one state and later the lookaheads will be found to be ambiguous. The one state with lookaheads is:
35:) text into a very specific internal representation that other programs, such as compilers, can work with. This process happens according to a set of
120:
in linear-bounded time. Rightmost derivation has very large memory requirements and implementing an LR parser was impractical due to the limited
58:
653:
711:
138:
548:
124:
of computers at that time. To address this shortcoming, in 1969, Frank DeRemer proposed two simplified versions of the LR parser, namely the
665:
141:
announced a series of optimizations for the LALR parser that would further improve its memory efficiency. Their work was published in 1982.
511:
233:
The standard example of an LR(1) grammar that cannot be parsed with the LALR(1) parser, exhibiting such a reduce/reduce conflict, is:
218:
The LALR(1) parser is less powerful than the LR(1) parser, and more powerful than the SLR(1) parser, though they all use the same
786:
783:
JavaScript based implementation of a LALR(1) parser generator, which can be run in a web-browser or from the command-line.
117:
89:. The automatically generated code may be augmented by hand-written code to augment the power of the resulting parser.
818:
1036:
1041:
356:
684:
470:
36:
1067:
1046:
984:
886:
219:
650:
720:
881:
853:
573:
222:. The simplification that the LALR parser introduces consists in merging rules that have identical
193:
As with other types of LR parsers, an LALR parser is quite efficient at finding the single correct
989:
932:
891:
662:
638:
1014:
994:
858:
811:
777:
This simulator is used to generate parsing tables LALR and resolve the exercises of the book.
458:
247:
78:
320:
1026:
620:
Frank DeRemer, Thomas
Pennello (1979), "Efficient Computation of LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets",
361:
110:
8:
1031:
999:
937:
915:
366:
51:
740:
963:
568:
197:
in a single left-to-right scan over the input stream, because it does not need to use
1009:
953:
870:
194:
166:)LR(0) (k tokens of lookahead, LR(0)). There is in fact a two-parameter family of LA(
70:
44:
905:
835:
804:
755:
603:
563:
526:
371:
20:
790:
669:
657:
313:
and vice versa. In fact, it is undecidable whether a given LL(1) grammar is LALR(
121:
66:
69:, though the reference grammars for many languages fail to be LALR due to being
598:
Pager, D. (1977), "A Practical
General Method for Constructing LR(k) Parsers",
40:
1061:
927:
843:
376:
958:
793: (archived May 7, 2021), a flash card-like tutorial on LALR(1) parsing.
544:
201:. Being a lookahead parser by definition, it always uses a lookahead, with
198:
98:
759:
1004:
530:
1021:
920:
607:
409:
396:
306:
130:
492:
Anderson, T.; Eve, J.; Horning, J. (1973). "Efficient LR(1) parsers".
900:
848:
796:
286:
102:
86:
827:
619:
236:
S → a E c → a F d → b F c → b E d E → e F → e
32:
780:
82:
741:"On the relationship between LL(1) and LR(1) grammars"
637:
by Dick Grune and Ceriel J. H. Jacobs, "9.7 LALR(1)",
29:
look-ahead, left-to-right, rightmost derivation parser
519:
433:
431:
429:
323:
549:"On the translation of languages from left to right"
512:"Efficient Computation of LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets"
491:
426:
335:
510:DeRemer, Frank; Pennello, Thomas (October 1982).
1059:
509:
347:exist, the grammar may or may not be LALR(1).
190:) parser, but these do not see practical use.
812:
602:, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 249–268,
77:automatically generated from a grammar by an
208:
50:An LALR parser is a simplified version of a
663:CSE 756: Compiler Design and Implementation
505:
503:
819:
805:
713:Practical Translators for LR(k) languages
622:Sigplan Notices - SIGPLAN, vol. 14, no. 8
597:
567:
450:
448:
446:
63:Practical Translators for LR(k) languages
500:
709:
437:
1060:
826:
738:
697:
685:Why is this LR(1) grammar not LALR(1)?
635:Parsing Techniques: A Practical Guide,
443:
800:
543:
301:both greater than 0, there are LALR(
182:, which can be derived from the LR(
118:deterministic context-free language
116:). The LR parser can recognize any
13:
174:) parsers for all combinations of
16:Type of parser in computer science
14:
1079:
768:
1037:History of compiler construction
455:LR Parsing: Theory and Practice,
285:) parsers are incomparable with
250:and conflicts will be reported.
57:The LALR parser was invented by
1042:Comparison of parser generators
690:
677:
643:
628:
408:"LALR(1)" is pronounced as the
402:
357:Comparison of parser generators
257:, since the ambiguous sequence
613:
591:
537:
485:
463:
389:
61:in his 1969 PhD dissertation,
1:
710:DeRemer, Franklin L. (1969).
569:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2
419:
276:
213:
395:"LALR" is pronounced as the
242:E → e. {c,d} F → e. {c,d}
205:being the most-common case.
7:
1047:Operator-precedence grammar
350:
144:
137:In 1979, Frank DeRemer and
10:
1084:
719:(PhD). MIT. Archived from
265:, rather than the correct
92:
977:
946:
869:
834:
674:Eitan Gurari, Spring 2008
651:7.9 LR(1) but not LALR(1)
209:Relation to other parsers
382:
305:) grammars that are not
990:Definite clause grammar
556:Information and Control
273:is not in the grammar.
228:reduce/reduce conflicts
754:(4 (Oct)): 1007–1022.
739:Beatty, J. C. (1982).
337:
336:{\displaystyle k>0}
995:Deterministic parsing
760:10.1145/322344.322350
656:4 August 2010 at the
473:. Eclipse JDT Project
471:"Generate the Parser"
338:
248:LALR parser generator
79:LALR parser generator
668:23 July 2010 at the
531:10.1145/69622.357187
362:Context-free grammar
321:
1032:Scannerless parsing
1000:Dynamic programming
114:ightmost derivation
52:canonical LR parser
1068:Parsing algorithms
828:Parsing algorithms
748:Journal of the ACM
624:, pp. 176–187
608:10.1007/BF00290336
600:Acta Informatica 7
457:Nigel P. Chapman,
412:"el-ay-el-arr-one"
333:
1055:
1054:
854:Recursive descent
775:Parsing Simulator
726:on 19 August 2013
162:) = LA(
45:computer language
1075:
1010:Parser generator
933:Recursive ascent
821:
814:
807:
798:
797:
787:LALR(1) tutorial
763:
745:
735:
733:
731:
725:
718:
701:
694:
688:
681:
675:
647:
641:
632:
626:
625:
617:
611:
610:
595:
589:
588:
586:
584:
579:on 15 March 2012
578:
572:. Archived from
571:
553:
541:
535:
534:
516:
507:
498:
497:
494:Acta Informatica
489:
483:
482:
480:
478:
467:
461:
452:
441:
435:
413:
406:
400:
393:
372:Parser generator
342:
340:
339:
334:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
224:kernel item sets
220:production rules
204:
131:Simple LR parser
37:production rules
21:computer science
1083:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1051:
973:
942:
865:
830:
825:
791:Wayback Machine
771:
766:
743:
729:
727:
723:
716:
705:
704:
695:
691:
682:
678:
670:Wayback Machine
658:Wayback Machine
648:
644:
633:
629:
618:
614:
596:
592:
582:
580:
576:
551:
542:
538:
514:
508:
501:
490:
486:
476:
474:
469:
468:
464:
453:
444:
436:
427:
422:
417:
416:
407:
403:
394:
390:
385:
353:
322:
319:
318:
279:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
243:
237:
216:
211:
202:
195:bottom-up parse
154:) parsers with
147:
128:(LALR) and the
95:
39:specified by a
17:
12:
11:
5:
1081:
1071:
1070:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
987:
981:
979:
978:Related topics
975:
974:
972:
971:
968:
967:
966:
956:
950:
948:
944:
943:
941:
940:
935:
930:
925:
924:
923:
918:
913:
908:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
884:
875:
873:
867:
866:
864:
863:
862:
861:
859:Tail recursive
851:
846:
840:
838:
832:
831:
824:
823:
816:
809:
801:
795:
794:
784:
778:
770:
769:External links
767:
765:
764:
736:
706:
703:
702:
689:
676:
642:
627:
612:
590:
562:(6): 607–639.
536:
525:(4): 615–649.
499:
484:
462:
442:
424:
423:
421:
418:
415:
414:
401:
399:"el-ay-el-arr"
387:
386:
384:
381:
380:
379:
374:
369:
364:
359:
352:
349:
332:
329:
326:
278:
275:
261:is reduced to
241:
235:
215:
212:
210:
207:
146:
143:
109:eft to Right,
94:
91:
41:formal grammar
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1080:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
993:
991:
988:
986:
983:
982:
980:
976:
969:
965:
962:
961:
960:
957:
955:
952:
951:
949:
945:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
903:
902:
899:
893:
892:Shunting-yard
890:
889:
888:
885:
883:
880:
879:
877:
876:
874:
872:
868:
860:
857:
856:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
841:
839:
837:
833:
829:
822:
817:
815:
810:
808:
803:
802:
799:
792:
788:
785:
782:
779:
776:
773:
772:
761:
757:
753:
749:
742:
737:
722:
715:
714:
708:
707:
699:
693:
686:
680:
673:
671:
667:
664:
659:
655:
652:
646:
640:
636:
631:
623:
616:
609:
605:
601:
594:
575:
570:
565:
561:
557:
550:
547:(July 1965).
546:
540:
532:
528:
524:
520:
513:
506:
504:
495:
488:
472:
466:
460:
456:
451:
449:
447:
439:
434:
432:
430:
425:
411:
405:
398:
392:
388:
378:
377:Token scanner
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
354:
348:
344:
330:
327:
324:
316:
312:
310:
304:
300:
296:
292:
290:
284:
274:
251:
249:
240:
234:
231:
229:
225:
221:
206:
200:
196:
191:
189:
186: +
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
142:
140:
135:
133:
132:
127:
126:Look-Ahead LR
123:
119:
115:
113:
108:
104:
101:invented the
100:
90:
88:
84:
80:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
59:Frank DeRemer
55:
53:
48:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
947:Mixed, other
938:Shift-reduce
910:
751:
747:
728:. Retrieved
721:the original
712:
692:
679:
661:
645:
634:
630:
621:
615:
599:
593:
581:. Retrieved
574:the original
559:
555:
545:Knuth, D. E.
539:
522:
518:
493:
487:
475:. Retrieved
465:
454:
438:DeRemer 1969
404:
391:
345:
314:
308:
302:
298:
294:
288:
282:
280:
252:
244:
238:
232:
227:
223:
217:
199:backtracking
192:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
139:Tom Pennello
136:
129:
125:
111:
106:
99:Donald Knuth
96:
75:
62:
56:
49:
28:
24:
18:
1005:Memoization
970:Statistical
964:Left corner
921:Generalized
878:Precedence
730:13 November
698:Beatty 1982
25:LALR parser
1022:Parse tree
954:Combinator
911:Look-ahead
496:(2): 2–39.
420:References
410:initialism
397:initialism
317:) for any
311:) grammars
293:: for any
277:LL parsers
214:LR parsers
916:Canonical
871:Bottom-up
367:Lookahead
291:) parsers
281:The LALR(
267:(F → e) c
263:(E → e) c
103:LR parser
97:In 1965,
87:GNU Bison
71:ambiguous
1062:Category
887:Operator
836:Top-down
666:Archived
654:Archived
459:p. 86–87
351:See also
145:Overview
81:such as
789:at the
477:29 June
203:LALR(1)
93:History
906:Simple
882:Simple
844:Earley
639:p. 302
583:29 May
269:, but
122:memory
43:for a
959:Chart
781:JS/CC
744:(PDF)
724:(PDF)
717:(PDF)
577:(PDF)
552:(PDF)
515:(PDF)
383:Notes
271:b E c
255:b e c
150:LALR(
33:parse
23:, an
1015:LALR
732:2012
585:2011
479:2012
328:>
297:and
178:and
170:)LR(
83:Yacc
67:Java
1027:AST
985:PEG
928:CYK
756:doi
660:",
604:doi
564:doi
527:doi
307:LL(
287:LL(
259:e c
85:or
47:.
19:In
1064::
901:LR
849:LL
752:29
750:.
746:.
558:.
554:.
521:.
517:.
502:^
445:^
428:^
343:.
73:.
54:.
820:e
813:t
806:v
762:.
758::
734:.
700:)
696:(
687:"
683:"
672:,
649:"
606::
587:.
566::
560:8
533:.
529::
523:4
481:.
440:.
331:0
325:k
315:k
309:k
303:j
299:k
295:j
289:k
283:j
188:k
184:j
180:k
176:j
172:j
168:k
164:k
160:k
156:k
152:k
112:R
107:L
105:(
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.