Knowledge

Life of Constantine

Source 📝

247:
emperor. These imperial letters, described or transcribed, frequently relate to religious matters concerning the treatment of pagans and Christians. They are thus an important source for Constantine's religious politics. The pronouncements in the letters are systematically pro-Christian and anti-pagan. They fit well into the Eusebius’ programmatic treatment of Constantine as a devout Christian emperor but are particularly vehement in their anti-paganism, given the historical context. The genuineness of the anti-pagan pronouncements, whether in content or in execution, has thus been a point of contention. Bradbury argues that the anti-pagan pronouncements were implemented but never applied, functioning as a moral guidance. Similarly, Curran argues that anti-pagan pronouncements were not actually put into practice, rather reflecting the emperor's personal stance. Regarding the pro-Christian imperial letters such as his letter to the Palestinians (
22: 191:
forbidding idol worship of his own image and the reiteration of the suppressing of idol worship and sacrifice. As the work concludes, Eusebius give much effort to uncover a personal Constantine, taking time to describe the Emperor as a remarkable public speaker and preacher, as well as a listener. Near the Emperor's death, Eusebius focuses on Constantine's mental and spiritual strength, as well as his physical strength, helping finish the portrait of a nearly godlike man. The panegyric ends with the death of the Emperor, his funeral, and the succession of the throne.
187:. The Council of Nicaea has been examined closely by scholars for bias however, as Eusebius was himself very involved in the politics of the council. The remainder of the book deals with the ecclesiastical laws of Constantine. Eusebius focuses much of his attention in painting Constantine in an extremely Christian light, building holy sites and allegedly destroying pagan temples. The majority of Constantine's imperial letters appear in book 3. 269:
to previous emperors who fell from power due to their persecution of Christians, Valerian chief among them, who was himself defeated and captured by the Persians, an event which Constantine ascribes to the Christian deity. Aware of the presence of Christians within Shapurs realm, Constantine, writing on their behalf, calls upon the king to rule over them piously or, in a veiled warning, face the same downfall as other persecutors.
105: 334:. Rather, Barnes claims that before the Council of Nicaea, Eusebius might have seen the Emperor once, in a large crowd of people. It wasn't until 25 years later that Eusebius would meet the Emperor, at the Council of Nicaea. After the Council however, personal contact was sporadic at best. Even letter exchanges between the two were infrequent. It is clear that Eusebius was not the courtier he had painted himself as in 298:
AD335. Placing the letter after these events provides Eusebius with the opportunity to use the letter to foreshadow Constantine's final war against the Persians, which he claims Constantine said ‘he had still to achieve’. Such foreshadowing is a common motif of Book 4 and a further caution when assessing the authenticity and context of Constantine's correspondence with Shapur as presented by Eusebius.
164:. This section has generated ample controversy, as there is much suspicion regarding the validity of the story. Eusebius claimed that he heard the story from the mouth of Constantine himself; however, much of modern scholarship agrees that the story is a distortion of facts or completely fabricated. The same account is often compared to 168:’, which provides a radically different depiction of the same story. Eusebius moved on to describe Constantine's next military campaign, the war against Licinius. Eusebius facilitates in the blackening of Licinius, who was pro-Christian, that was started by Constantine as imperial propaganda to justify the aggression against 273:
viewing its content as in keeping with Constantine's' vision of himself as an ambassador of God on earth and his desire for a universal Christian empire. Even so, the religious content of the letter and the claims by Constantine to represent the Christians of the Persian Empire continues to divide scholarly opinion.
310:
wrote that Eusebius was "more intent on the rhetorical finish of his composition and the praises of the Emperor, than on an accurate statement of facts". Indeed, while many accept the work as generally reliable, few modern scholars claim that the text is not without its question marks, especially in
297:
is peculiar. Barnes has argued for an adoption of an early date for the letter, around AD324/5, and fitting into Book 2 after the defeat of Licinius. Eusebius however has placed it in Book IV, after Constantine's wars against the Sarmatians and Goths on the Danube, thus moving its chronology to after
272:
The Letters authenticity is source of debate for many Constantinian scholars. Barnes accepts the letter as genuine, its content in keeping with Constantine's' own view of his career, especially in the period of reform after the defeat of Licinius. Elizabeth Fowden argues for the letters authenticity,
268:
It has been dated between 324 and 336. In the letter Constantine expresses to Shapur his devotion to Christianity, attributing his success to the Christian deity whose beneficence is the result of Constantine's piety, religious toleration and destruction of Tyrants and persecutors. He makes reference
246:
itself has many imperial documents and letters from Constantine, some repeating their appearance in Life of Constantine. Eusebius often quotes verbatim both his own work and the imperial documents; however, he also quotes without citing, often to help build his narrative of Constantine as a god-sent
190:
Book 4 is largely concerned with Constantine and his personal life and final accomplishments, concluding with the death of Constantine. Most of the work is devoted to the illustration of Constantine's personal piety. His trip to Persia is painted in an apologetic universal Christian theme, his laws
204:
notes that Eusebius clearly omits accounts and information to portray Constantine in the favorable light. Eusebius advanced the idea of divine right on Constantine, as he was Emperor due to God's will, and is God imitator on earth. Eusebius's narrative constructs Constantine as god-sent, in order
325:
Eusebius was himself a participating member of the Council of Nicaea and his motivations in writing on the matter in which he was an active participant must be approached with caution. Eusebius also takes great pain in describing himself as very close to the Emperor, when in fact, the opposite is
276:
The reliability and motives of Eusebius as a biographer must be considered when analysing the authenticity of the letter and its contents. The letter is distinctive in style from Eusebius’ own writing, and its content and tone is similar to that of the other Constantinian documents in the
251:
2.24-44), various interpretations have been offered as well. While Barnes argues Constantine's letters were public proclamations of his faith within his broader pro-Christian program, Drake interprets the letters rather as documents in favour of religious toleration.
179:. The rest of book 2 ends with the outlining of the religious problems faced by Constantine. Book 3 is largely concerned with Constantine's constructive settlement of the various religious problems. The section includes the only continuous contemporary account of the 349:
remains the most important work for examining the reign of Constantine. Only a select number of pagan accounts of the reign exist or have been discovered, with only one pagan panegyric known to exist. While Eusebius does have a clear pro-Christian bias,
199:
Eusebius’ treatment of Constantine has generated much of the controversy surrounding the text. Eusebius’ use of the panegyric style results in an extremely generous treatment of Constantine that has been noted for its less than objective aims.
217:
Eusebius's known sources for painting a textual portrait of Constantine and his rule come from eight legal texts, forty-six biblical references, and eight literary references. Eusebius often referenced his own former works, forty-one times in
89:. It was never completed due to the death of Eusebius in 339. The work provides scholars with one of the most comprehensive sources for the religious policies of Constantine's reign. In addition to detailing the religious policies of the 285:
Book 2, was taken by many as a sign of his honesty in his use of imperial texts. Unlike the other letters quoted by him this one an extract, lacking the formal greeting found in other imperial documents quoted in the
144:
and oppressive rule accentuates the presentation of Constantine as a strong Christian and a just man. This section also established the overarching metaphor in the work, as Eusebius likens Constantine to
205:
to end the persecution of Christians under the Roman Empire, and ensure the correct worship of God. Eusebius’ vehicle for this narrative is metaphor, and he explicitly paints Constantine in the image of
314:
Eusebius consistently neglects relevant information to portray Constantine in a favorable light. He also engages in the politicization of several topics in the work, most notably the campaign against
330:
notes that Eusebius and Constantine meeting in person was a rare occurrence, as Eusebius did not reside near the capital, nor did he have special access to Constantine, as he claims in
322:. In the former case, Eusebius engages in the tarnishing of Licinius’ reputation, painting him a supporter of pagans and a truce breaker, both claims that are historically dubious. 152:
Eusebius moves on from the introduction to Constantine's military exploits for the remainder of Book 1 and half of Book 2. The first of which, the campaign against
306:
Eusebius's apologetic glorification of Constantine has led scholars to question the credibility of his work: already in the 5th century AD, Christian historian
234: 128:
begins with the declaration that Constantine is immortal. This opening sets the tone for the rest of the work, a general glorification and deification of the
1067: 354:
also provides several insightful secular matters that have not been discovered outside of the work. However, despite its modern significance,
1036: 149:. Eusebius suggests that it was God's will to raise Constantine to emperor, as a reliever of the Christian torment in the Empire. 281:
The discovery of the ‘London Papyrus’, an independent imperial document which was found to be quoted honestly by Eusebius in the
1087: 176: 925: 898: 864: 836: 821: 783: 962: 1062: 1072: 358:
was widely obscure in the 4th and 5th centuries, and did not reach popularity until much later in history.
327: 201: 1057: 805:
Bradbury, Scott (1994). ‘Constantine and the Problem of Anti-Pagan Legislation in the Fourth Century’,
1082: 993: 224: 879:
Fowden, Elizabeth Key (2006). "Constantine and the Peoples of the Eastern Frontier", in Lenski, N.
21: 319: 180: 1019: 1012: 955: 999: 307: 161: 78: 49: 986: 82: 8: 1077: 109: 842:
Drake, H. A. (Jan. 1988). ‘What Eusebius Knew: The Genesis of the “Vita Constantinii”’,
948: 921: 894: 860: 832: 817: 779: 915: 888: 854: 773: 140:. Constantine is contrasted with the tyrannical Diocletian, whose persecution of 74: 62: 38: 1051: 90: 290:
and is the only one in which Constantine is dealing with secular affairs.
98: 165: 141: 137: 917:
From Nicaea to Chalcedon: A Guide to the Literature and Its Background
261: 153: 70: 54: 890:
Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of Monotheism in Late Antiquity
971: 850: 798:
Barnes, Timothy (1985). ‘Constantine and the Christians of Persia’:
315: 184: 169: 104: 129: 859:. Averil, Cameron; Stuart Hall, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 136:. The work progresses into Constantine's time under the Emperor 814:
Pagan city and Christian capital : Rome in the fourth century
206: 146: 133: 42: 940: 101:, as well as a semi-bibliographic account of Constantine. 97:
to engage several of his own religious concerns, such as
829:
Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance
86: 264:’ is a diplomatic exchange located in Book 4 of the 175:
The work transitions from military campaigns to the
881:The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine, 255: 1049: 311:regards to the motives and biases of Eusebius. 156:, contains perhaps the most famous scene in the 765: 424: 422: 778:. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 397: 395: 956: 831:, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 511: 509: 1068:Cultural depictions of Constantine the Great 914:Young, Frances; Teal, Andrew (1 June 2010). 419: 883:U.S.A. Cambridge University Press p. 389-90 392: 194: 1037:National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1 963: 949: 506: 341: 913: 893:. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 386: 920:. Grand Rapids: Baker Publishing Group. 849: 743: 719: 707: 500: 488: 476: 452: 440: 428: 413: 401: 374: 103: 20: 1050: 886: 771: 755: 731: 515: 464: 944: 645: 643: 641: 25:An image of Constantine, subject of 13: 638: 14: 1099: 93:under Constantine, Eusebius uses 293:The letters location within the 260:The ‘Letter of Constantine I to 749: 737: 725: 713: 701: 688: 679: 670: 661: 652: 629: 620: 611: 602: 593: 584: 575: 566: 557: 548: 539: 530: 521: 494: 482: 256:The Letter to Shapur in Book IV 16:4th century AD work by Eusebius 470: 458: 446: 434: 407: 380: 368: 301: 1: 1088:Works by Eusebius of Caesarea 183:as well as the pilgrimage to 177:religious rule of Constantine 34:Life of Constantine the Great 970: 800:The Journal of Roman Studies 766:General and cited references 563:Drake 2000, pp. 199, 245-250 361: 108:Facsmilie of a 15th-century 55: 7: 816:, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 119: 10: 1104: 635:Eusebius 1999, pp. 313-314 608:Eusebius 1999, pp. 157-158 527:Bradbury 1994, pp. 120-121 212: 43: 1029: 978: 590:Eusebius 1999, pp.156-157 572:Eusebius 1999, pp.156-158 124:Divided into four books, 57:Bios Megalou Kōnstantinou 44:Βίος Μεγάλου Κωνσταντίνου 812:Curran, John R. (2000). 775:Constantine and Eusebius 772:Barnes, Timothy (1981). 617:Barnes, 1985, pp.130-132 545:Curran 2000, pp. 169-179 195:Treatment of Constantine 694:Socrates Scholasticus, 658:Barnes 1985, pp.131-132 626:Fowden 2006, pp. 389-90 342:Historical significance 244:Ecclessiastical History 1063:Ancient Roman speeches 1013:Praeparatio evangelica 887:Fowden, Garth (1993). 696:Historia Ecclesiastica 581:Barnes, (1985), p. 132 230:Historia Ecclesiastica 225:Ecclesiastical History 116: 66: 29: 1000:Epistula ad Carpianum 839:, retrieved 2019-12-2 827:Drake, H. A. (2000). 824:, retrieved 2019-12-2 685:Drake 1988, pp. 27-28 676:Eusebius 1999, p. 175 536:Bradbury 1994, p. 135 387:Young & Teal 2010 308:Socrates Scholasticus 162:vision of Constantine 107: 79:Constantine the Great 24: 1073:Greek-language books 844:Classical Philology, 698:, Book I, Chapter 1. 599:Eusebius 1999, p.157 235:Tricennalian Oration 83:Eusebius of Caesarea 1006:Life of Constantine 856:Life of Constantine 807:Classical Philology 649:Eusebius 1999, p.5 554:Barnes 1981, p. 210 356:Life of Constantine 352:Life of Constantine 347:Life of Constantine 336:Life of Constantine 332:Life of Constantine 220:Life of Constantine 158:Life of Constantine 126:Life of Constantine 114:Life of Constantine 110:Old Church Slavonic 95:Life of Constantine 85:in the 4th century 27:Life of Constantine 734:, pp. 266–267 667:Barnes 1985, p.132 117: 112:manuscript of the 30: 1058:4th-century books 1045: 1044: 927:978-0-8010-3915-7 900:978-0-691-06989-0 866:978-0-19-814924-8 837:978-0-801-87104-7 822:978-0-199-25420-0 785:978-0-674-16530-4 320:Council of Nicaea 181:Council of Nicaea 132:and his works on 52: 1095: 1083:Unfinished books 965: 958: 951: 942: 941: 937: 935: 934: 910: 908: 907: 876: 874: 873: 795: 793: 792: 759: 753: 747: 746:, pp. 47–48 741: 735: 729: 723: 717: 711: 705: 699: 692: 686: 683: 677: 674: 668: 665: 659: 656: 650: 647: 636: 633: 627: 624: 618: 615: 609: 606: 600: 597: 591: 588: 582: 579: 573: 570: 564: 561: 555: 552: 546: 543: 537: 534: 528: 525: 519: 513: 504: 498: 492: 486: 480: 474: 468: 462: 456: 450: 444: 438: 432: 426: 417: 411: 405: 399: 390: 384: 378: 372: 249:Vita Constantini 240:Laus Constantini 67:Vita Constantini 60: 48: 46: 45: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1025: 974: 969: 932: 930: 928: 905: 903: 901: 871: 869: 867: 790: 788: 786: 768: 763: 762: 754: 750: 742: 738: 730: 726: 718: 714: 706: 702: 693: 689: 684: 680: 675: 671: 666: 662: 657: 653: 648: 639: 634: 630: 625: 621: 616: 612: 607: 603: 598: 594: 589: 585: 580: 576: 571: 567: 562: 558: 553: 549: 544: 540: 535: 531: 526: 522: 514: 507: 499: 495: 487: 483: 475: 471: 463: 459: 451: 447: 439: 435: 427: 420: 412: 408: 400: 393: 385: 381: 373: 369: 364: 344: 304: 258: 222:, most notably 215: 197: 122: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1101: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1043: 1042: 1040: 1039: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1024: 1023: 1016: 1009: 1002: 997: 994:Church History 990: 982: 980: 976: 975: 968: 967: 960: 953: 945: 939: 938: 926: 911: 899: 884: 877: 865: 847: 846:Vol. 83, No. 1 840: 825: 810: 803: 796: 784: 767: 764: 761: 760: 748: 736: 724: 712: 700: 687: 678: 669: 660: 651: 637: 628: 619: 610: 601: 592: 583: 574: 565: 556: 547: 538: 529: 520: 505: 493: 481: 469: 457: 445: 433: 418: 406: 391: 379: 366: 365: 363: 360: 343: 340: 328:Timothy Barnes 326:most likely. 303: 300: 257: 254: 214: 211: 202:Timothy Barnes 196: 193: 121: 118: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1100: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1028: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 995: 991: 989: 988: 984: 983: 981: 977: 973: 966: 961: 959: 954: 952: 947: 946: 943: 929: 923: 919: 918: 912: 902: 896: 892: 891: 885: 882: 878: 868: 862: 858: 857: 852: 848: 845: 841: 838: 834: 830: 826: 823: 819: 815: 811: 808: 804: 801: 797: 787: 781: 777: 776: 770: 769: 757: 752: 745: 744:Eusebius 1999 740: 733: 728: 721: 720:Eusebius 1999 716: 709: 708:Eusebius 1999 704: 697: 691: 682: 673: 664: 655: 646: 644: 642: 632: 623: 614: 605: 596: 587: 578: 569: 560: 551: 542: 533: 524: 518:, p. 270 517: 512: 510: 502: 501:Eusebius 1999 497: 490: 489:Eusebius 1999 485: 478: 477:Eusebius 1999 473: 467:, p. 267 466: 461: 455:, p. 313 454: 453:Eusebius 1999 449: 443:, p. 287 442: 441:Eusebius 1999 437: 431:, p. 256 430: 429:Eusebius 1999 425: 423: 416:, p. 224 415: 414:Eusebius 1999 410: 404:, p. 204 403: 402:Eusebius 1999 398: 396: 388: 383: 376: 375:Eusebius 1999 371: 367: 359: 357: 353: 348: 339: 337: 333: 329: 323: 321: 317: 312: 309: 299: 296: 291: 289: 284: 280: 274: 270: 267: 263: 253: 250: 245: 241: 237: 236: 231: 227: 226: 221: 210: 208: 203: 192: 188: 186: 182: 178: 173: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 150: 148: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 115: 111: 106: 102: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 59: 58: 51: 40: 36: 35: 28: 23: 19: 1018: 1011: 1005: 1004: 992: 985: 931:. Retrieved 916: 904:. Retrieved 889: 880: 870:. Retrieved 855: 843: 828: 813: 806: 799: 789:. Retrieved 774: 758:, p. 86 751: 739: 727: 715: 703: 695: 690: 681: 672: 663: 654: 631: 622: 613: 604: 595: 586: 577: 568: 559: 550: 541: 532: 523: 503:, p. 15 496: 491:, p. 35 484: 479:, p. 34 472: 460: 448: 436: 409: 389:, p. 15 382: 370: 355: 351: 346: 345: 335: 331: 324: 313: 305: 294: 292: 287: 282: 278: 275: 271: 265: 259: 248: 243: 239: 233: 229: 223: 219: 216: 198: 189: 174: 157: 151: 125: 123: 113: 94: 91:Roman Empire 77:in honor of 56: 33: 32: 31: 26: 18: 1030:Manuscripts 1020:Onomasticon 809:89 120–139. 756:Fowden 1993 732:Barnes 1981 722:, p. 7 710:, p. 4 516:Barnes 1981 465:Barnes 1981 377:, p. 1 302:Credibility 99:apologetics 73:written in 1078:Panegyrics 1052:Categories 933:2012-12-01 906:2012-12-01 872:2012-12-01 791:2012-12-01 232:) and the 166:Lactantius 142:Christians 138:Diocletian 987:Chronicon 802:, Vol. 75 362:Citations 262:Shapur II 242:). The 154:Maxentius 71:panegyric 50:translit. 972:Eusebius 853:(1999). 851:Eusebius 318:and the 316:Licinius 185:Bordeaux 170:Licinius 120:Synopsis 213:Sources 130:Emperor 69:) is a 924:  897:  863:  835:  820:  782:  160:, the 53:  979:Works 279:Life. 266:Life. 207:Moses 147:Moses 134:Earth 75:Greek 63:Latin 39:Greek 922:ISBN 895:ISBN 861:ISBN 833:ISBN 818:ISBN 780:ISBN 295:Life 288:Vita 283:Life 81:by 1054:: 640:^ 508:^ 421:^ 394:^ 338:. 209:. 172:. 87:AD 65:: 61:; 47:, 41:: 964:e 957:t 950:v 936:. 909:. 875:. 794:. 238:( 228:( 37:(

Index


Greek
translit.
Latin
panegyric
Greek
Constantine the Great
Eusebius of Caesarea
AD
Roman Empire
apologetics

Old Church Slavonic
Emperor
Earth
Diocletian
Christians
Moses
Maxentius
vision of Constantine
Lactantius
Licinius
religious rule of Constantine
Council of Nicaea
Bordeaux
Timothy Barnes
Moses
Ecclesiastical History
Tricennalian Oration
Shapur II

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.