Knowledge

Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell

Source 📝

48: 310:
As such, it contributes to the growing field of climate litigation. While the decision only has jurisdiction in the Netherlands, although pertaining to Shell's global operations, it could set a precedent for other environmental lawsuits against other large companies with high emissions that have not taken sufficient steps to reduce their emissions. The impact of the court's decision was considered by legal experts to be strengthened due to its reliance on human rights standards and international measures on climate change.
287:
The Hague District Court orderd that Shell's current sustainability policy was insufficiently "concrete", and that its emissions were greater than that of most countries. Due to these factors, the court ordered that Shell must indeed reduce its global emissions by 45% by 2030 compared to 2019 levels;
309:
The case was considered a landmark ruling in environmental law related to climate change: while previous lawsuits against governments have prevailed for enforcing a more effective climate policy, this was considered the first major lawsuit to hold a corporation to the tenets of the Paris Agreement.
235:
against Shell in April 2019, arguing that Shell should change its business model to reach an emissions reduction target of 45% by 2030 in line with the Paris Agreement. By failing to change, the plaintiffs argued, Shell had failed to uphold the unwritten duty of care laid down in Book 6 Section 162
198:
is one of the largest oil and gas companies in the world; its headquarters are in the United Kingdom since 2022. Shell is the ninth-largest corporate contributor to global pollution, producing about 2.5% of global emissions. As the Paris Agreement was being developed, Shell evaluated its businesses
120:
The policy, policy intentions and ambitions of Royal Dutch Shell* (hereafter Shell) are incompatible with Shell's reduction obligation. The claimed order to comply with that obligation must be allowed. The order is declared provisionally enforceable. * After losing in the Hague District Court,
299:
and other GHGs, anywhere in the world and caused in whatever manner, contributes to this damage and its increase” (insertion added) and that “the (…) circumstance that RDS is not the only partly responsible for tackling dangerous climate change (…) does not absolve RDS of its individual partial
207:
emissions by 30% by 2035, compared to 2016 levels, and by 65% by 2050. So far, in 2022 only 1,5 % of the investments of Shell are to be used for renewables (wind and solar power generation), and with current investment trends Shell's carbon emissions are expected to rise with 4% up to 2030
199:
to determine what it could do to address emissions, but had stated in 2014 that it believed that the Paris targets were unattainable and did not plan to change its business model away from oil and gas. Following the signing of the Agreement, Shell issued a statement that it would address its CO
193:
in 2015, which aimed to limit the rise in the global average temperature to under 1.5 °C through various milestones at 2050, large corporations operating in signatory countries began evaluating if they could alter operations to meet the targets of the Agreement. The British multinational
214:
In order to safeguard the temperature limit set out in the Paris Agreement, global carbon emissions to decrease with 45% in 2030. Given the clear gap between Shell's plans and the targets of the Paris Agreement, seven environmental organisations foundations –
539: 270:
were held in December 2020. The plaintiffs were required under Dutch law to demonstrate that a viable alternative business model existed for Shell to achieve the suggested 45% reduction goal, and had used the recent transformation of Danish company
738: 288:
the reduction targets include emissions from its operations and products. The court declared the order provisionally enforceable, meaning that the order has immediate effect, even if one of the parties appeals the ruling.
529: 262:
is effective policy, investment in technology and changing customer behaviour. None of which will be achieved with this court action. Addressing a challenge this big requires a collaborative and global approach."
172:
to reduce its global carbon emissions from its 2019 levels by 45% by 2030, relating not only to the emissions from its operations, but also those from the products it sells. It is considered to be the first major
456: 730: 416: 813: 510: 316:
After losing in the Hague District Court, Shell dropped "Royal Dutch" from its name, and moved its headquarters to London. It said the choice was not due to losing the case.
572: 363: 707: 618: 488: 17: 779: 1073: 247: 243: 888: 446: 351:(24 March 2021) 1 BvR 2656/18, duty on state to reduce carbon emissions faster than government required in Act to protect right to life and environment 1097: 1130: 406: 984: 1135: 801: 1011: 209: 562: 279:
by 2050. Plaintiffs considered Shell's pledge to be inadequate as the company would still fail to meet the Paris Agreement goals.
881: 355: 697: 513: 674: 604: 478: 251: 1140: 874: 765: 275:
from fossil fuels to renewables as a viable example. During the trial, Shell issued a pledge in February 2021 to be
1155: 1125: 1081: 1030: 339: 367:
EWHC 1233 (Ch), directors' duties to plan to divest fossil fuels in light of Paris Agreement and right to life
1057: 81: 826:
We will continue to focus on these efforts and fully expect to appeal today's disappointing court decision
911: 860: 853: 651: 639: 94: 1120: 897: 255: 174: 157: 300:
responsibility to contribute to the fight against dangerous climate change according to its ability.
1150: 1065: 153: 838: 1145: 702: 343:(20 December 2019) duty of state to cut emissions in line with Paris Agreement and right to life 530:"Climate change actions against corporations: Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell plc" 1049: 947: 232: 220: 161: 335:(2015) Case No. 2 O 285/15 duty of power company in tort to compensate for climate damage 8: 929: 750: 272: 47: 347: 238: 965: 837:
T Wilson, 'Shell investors back moving HQ from Netherlands to UK' (10 December 2021)
809: 371: 276: 259: 734: 313:
Shell appealled the ruling. The hearings of the appeal case are not yet scheduled.
133: 1089: 802:"Reactie Shell op uitspraak klimaatzaak / Shell response to climate case verdict" 664: 534: 517: 331: 190: 121:
Shell dropped "Royal Dutch" from its name, and moved its headquarters to London.
613: 563:"Shell to expand gas business despite pledge to speed up net zero carbon drive" 216: 204: 141: 35: 1114: 859:
Rechtbank Den Haag 26 May 2021, C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379 (engelse versie),
866: 567: 451: 411: 359:
NZCA 552 duty of oil and power companies in tort to pay for climate damage
178: 149: 254:. Shell stated in response to the summons that it was doing its part to 227:, Fossielvrij, Waddenvereniging, Both ENDS, Jongeren Milieu Actief, and 483: 447:"Court orders Royal Dutch Shell to cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030" 224: 267: 228: 195: 169: 165: 145: 59: 39: 231: – and 17,379 individual claimants in the Netherlands filed a 137: 407:"Shell in court over claims it hampered fossil fuels phase-out" 325: 203:
emissions, releasing a plan that called for reductions of its
364:
McGaughey and Davies v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd
852:
Rechtbank Den Haag 26 May 2021, C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379,
731:"Court orders Royal Dutch Shell to cut net emissions by 45%" 665:"Shell: Netherlands court orders oil giant to cut emissions" 479:"Milieudefensie dagvaardt Shell in rechtszaak om uitstoot" 774: 669: 164:
and a group of other NGO's against the oil corporation,
152:
in 2021 related to efforts by several NGO's to curtail
698:"Shell ordered by Dutch Court to cut carbon emissions" 440: 438: 436: 434: 1074:
People of the State of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
794: 689: 431: 1112: 1098:BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 722: 400: 398: 396: 394: 392: 390: 388: 985:State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation 896: 882: 110:Larisa Alwin, Irene Kroft and Michiel Harmsen 598: 596: 594: 592: 590: 385: 889: 875: 695: 46: 1012:Asghar Leghari vs. Federation of Pakistan 587: 160:. It was brought by the Dutch branch of 18:Milieudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell 560: 356:Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd 14: 1131:Carbon emissions in the European Union 1113: 728: 444: 404: 870: 770:emissions in landmark climate ruling" 763: 602: 561:Ambrose, Jillian (11 February 2021). 258:, and that "What will accelerate the 189:Following the global adoption of the 1136:Climate change in the European Union 542:from the original on 19 January 2021 405:Boffey, Daniel (30 November 2020). 252:European Convention on Human Rights 24: 993:Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell 471: 266:Hearings at the district court at 129:Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell 25: 1167: 846: 696:MacFarlene, Sarah (26 May 2021). 168:. In May 2021, the court ordered 816:from the original on 27 May 2021 782:from the original on 26 May 2021 741:from the original on 26 May 2021 710:from the original on 26 May 2021 677:from the original on 26 May 2021 621:from the original on 26 May 2021 575:from the original on 24 May 2021 491:from the original on 27 May 2021 459:from the original on 26 May 2021 419:from the original on 17 May 2021 1082:Connecticut v. ExxonMobil Corp. 831: 766:"Court orders Shell to slash CO 757: 657: 304: 1031:McGaughey and Davies v USS Ltd 645: 633: 609:emissions in watershed ruling" 554: 522: 503: 445:Boffey, Daniel (26 May 2021). 375:, a similar 2024 case In Italy 340:Urgenda v State of Netherlands 291:The Court said the following: 242:(Dutch Civil Code) as well as 13: 1: 603:Brian, Stuart (26 May 2021). 1058:Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp. 764:Zindy, Hanna (26 May 2021). 729:Corder, Mike (26 May 2021). 7: 605:"Shell ordered to reduce CO 319: 282: 10: 1172: 912:Grande-Synthe climate case 487:(in Dutch). 5 April 2019. 158:multinational corporations 1141:Climate change litigation 1041: 1022: 1003: 976: 957: 940: 921: 904: 898:Climate change litigation 175:climate change litigation 119: 114: 106: 101: 90: 80: 65: 54: 45: 34: 1066:Juliana v. United States 379: 295:... every emission of CO 184: 154:carbon dioxide emissions 1156:2021 in the environment 1126:2021 in the Netherlands 861:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339 854:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5337 703:The Wall Street Journal 652:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339 640:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5337 95:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339 86:ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5337 27:Dutch legal case (2021) 302: 256:address climate change 509:Burgerlijk Wetboek - 293: 219:(the Dutch branch of 69:26 May 2021 1050:Massachusetts v. EPA 948:Climate Case Ireland 233:class-action lawsuit 221:Friends of the Earth 162:Friends of the Earth 930:Neubauer v. Germany 751:The Washington Post 538:. 13 January 2021. 516:27 May 2021 at the 511:Book 6 Section 162 348:Neubauer v Germany 239:Burgerlijk Wetboek 140:case heard by the 58:District court of 1108: 1107: 966:Greenpeace v. Eni 810:Royal Dutch Shell 372:Greenpeace v. Eni 260:energy transition 208:compared to 2019 177:ruling against a 125: 124: 16:(Redirected from 1163: 1121:2021 in case law 891: 884: 877: 868: 867: 841: 835: 829: 828: 823: 821: 798: 792: 791: 789: 787: 761: 755: 754: 748: 746: 735:Associated Press 726: 720: 719: 717: 715: 693: 687: 686: 684: 682: 661: 655: 649: 643: 637: 631: 630: 628: 626: 600: 585: 584: 582: 580: 558: 552: 551: 549: 547: 526: 520: 507: 501: 500: 498: 496: 475: 469: 468: 466: 464: 442: 429: 428: 426: 424: 402: 134:human rights law 102:Court membership 76: 74: 50: 32: 31: 21: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1151:Climate justice 1111: 1110: 1109: 1104: 1090:Held v. Montana 1037: 1018: 999: 972: 953: 936: 917: 900: 895: 849: 844: 839:Financial Times 836: 832: 819: 817: 812:. 26 May 2021. 800: 799: 795: 785: 783: 769: 762: 758: 744: 742: 727: 723: 713: 711: 694: 690: 680: 678: 673:. 26 May 2021. 663: 662: 658: 650: 646: 638: 634: 624: 622: 608: 601: 588: 578: 576: 559: 555: 545: 543: 535:Clifford Chance 528: 527: 523: 518:Wayback Machine 508: 504: 494: 492: 477: 476: 472: 462: 460: 443: 432: 422: 420: 403: 386: 382: 332:Lliuya v RWE AG 322: 307: 298: 285: 202: 191:Paris Agreement 187: 72: 70: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1169: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1146:Dutch case law 1143: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1094: 1086: 1078: 1070: 1062: 1054: 1045: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1026: 1024: 1023:United Kingdom 1020: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1007: 1005: 1001: 1000: 998: 997: 989: 980: 978: 974: 973: 971: 970: 961: 959: 955: 954: 952: 951: 944: 942: 938: 937: 935: 934: 925: 923: 919: 918: 916: 915: 908: 906: 902: 901: 894: 893: 886: 879: 871: 865: 864: 857: 848: 847:External links 845: 843: 842: 830: 793: 767: 756: 721: 688: 656: 644: 632: 614:Deutsche Welle 606: 586: 553: 521: 502: 470: 430: 383: 381: 378: 377: 376: 368: 360: 352: 344: 336: 328: 321: 318: 306: 303: 296: 284: 281: 217:Milieudefensie 205:carbon dioxide 200: 186: 183: 142:district court 123: 122: 117: 116: 112: 111: 108: 107:Judges sitting 104: 103: 99: 98: 92: 88: 87: 84: 78: 77: 67: 63: 62: 56: 52: 51: 43: 42: 36:Milieudefensie 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1168: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1042:United States 1040: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1021: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1002: 995: 994: 990: 987: 986: 982: 981: 979: 975: 968: 967: 963: 962: 960: 956: 949: 946: 945: 943: 939: 932: 931: 927: 926: 924: 920: 913: 910: 909: 907: 903: 899: 892: 887: 885: 880: 878: 873: 872: 869: 862: 858: 855: 851: 850: 840: 834: 827: 815: 811: 807: 803: 797: 781: 777: 776: 771: 760: 752: 740: 736: 732: 725: 709: 705: 704: 699: 692: 676: 672: 671: 666: 660: 653: 648: 641: 636: 620: 616: 615: 610: 599: 597: 595: 593: 591: 574: 570: 569: 564: 557: 541: 537: 536: 531: 525: 519: 515: 512: 506: 490: 486: 485: 480: 474: 458: 454: 453: 448: 441: 439: 437: 435: 418: 414: 413: 408: 401: 399: 397: 395: 393: 391: 389: 384: 374: 373: 369: 366: 365: 361: 358: 357: 353: 350: 349: 345: 342: 341: 337: 334: 333: 329: 327: 324: 323: 317: 314: 311: 301: 292: 289: 280: 278: 274: 269: 264: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 212: 211: 206: 197: 192: 182: 180: 176: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 130: 118: 115:Case opinions 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 93: 89: 85: 83: 79: 68: 64: 61: 57: 53: 49: 44: 41: 37: 33: 30: 19: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1072: 1064: 1056: 1048: 1029: 1010: 992: 991: 983: 964: 928: 833: 825: 818:. Retrieved 805: 796: 784:. Retrieved 773: 759: 749:– via 743:. Retrieved 724: 712:. Retrieved 701: 691: 679:. Retrieved 668: 659: 647: 635: 623:. Retrieved 612: 577:. Retrieved 568:The Guardian 566: 556: 544:. Retrieved 533: 524: 505: 493:. Retrieved 482: 473: 461:. Retrieved 452:The Guardian 450: 421:. Retrieved 412:The Guardian 410: 370: 362: 354: 346: 338: 330: 315: 312: 308: 305:Significance 294: 290: 286: 265: 237: 213: 188: 132:(2021) is a 128: 127: 126: 29: 977:Netherlands 546:10 December 495:10 December 179:corporation 150:Netherlands 1115:Categories 484:NOS Nieuws 244:articles 2 225:Greenpeace 91:Transcript 73:2021-05-26 863:(English) 806:shell.com 654:(English) 268:The Hague 229:ActionAid 166:Shell plc 146:The Hague 97:(English) 60:The Hague 1004:Pakistan 814:Archived 780:Archived 739:Archived 708:Archived 675:Archived 619:Archived 573:Archived 540:Archived 514:Archived 489:Archived 457:Archived 417:Archived 320:See also 283:Judgment 277:net-zero 138:tort law 38:et al v 941:Ireland 922:Germany 856:(Dutch) 642:(Dutch) 250:of the 236:of the 148:in the 71: ( 66:Decided 1101:(2021) 1093:(2020) 1085:(2020) 1077:(2018) 1069:(2015) 1061:(2008) 1053:(2007) 1034:(2022) 1015:(2015) 996:(2021) 988:(2019) 969:(2024) 950:(2020) 933:(2020) 914:(2021) 905:France 820:26 May 786:26 May 745:26 May 714:26 May 681:26 May 625:26 May 579:26 May 463:26 May 423:26 May 326:EU law 273:Ørsted 210:levels 958:Italy 380:Notes 196:Shell 185:Facts 170:Shell 55:Court 40:Shell 822:2021 788:2021 747:2021 716:2021 683:2021 627:2021 581:2021 548:2021 497:2021 465:2021 425:2021 246:and 136:and 82:ECLI 775:CNN 670:BBC 223:), 156:by 144:of 1117:: 824:. 808:. 804:. 778:. 772:. 737:. 733:. 706:. 700:. 667:. 617:. 611:. 589:^ 571:. 565:. 532:. 481:. 455:. 449:. 433:^ 415:. 409:. 387:^ 181:. 890:e 883:t 876:v 790:. 768:2 753:. 718:. 685:. 629:. 607:2 583:. 550:. 499:. 467:. 427:. 297:2 248:8 201:2 75:) 20:)

Index

Milieudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell
Milieudefensie
Shell

The Hague
ECLI
ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339
human rights law
tort law
district court
The Hague
Netherlands
carbon dioxide emissions
multinational corporations
Friends of the Earth
Shell plc
Shell
climate change litigation
corporation
Paris Agreement
Shell
carbon dioxide
levels
Milieudefensie
Friends of the Earth
Greenpeace
ActionAid
class-action lawsuit
Burgerlijk Wetboek
articles 2

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.