Knowledge

Motor unit recruitment

Source 📝

42:. A motor unit consists of one motor neuron and all of the muscle fibers it stimulates. All muscles consist of a number of motor units and the fibers belonging to a motor unit are dispersed and intermingle amongst fibers of other units. The muscle fibers belonging to one motor unit can be spread throughout part, or most of the entire muscle, depending on the number of fibers and size of the muscle. When a motor neuron is activated, all of the muscle fibers innervated by the motor neuron are stimulated and contract. The activation of one motor neuron will result in a weak but distributed muscle contraction. The activation of more motor neurons will result in more muscle fibers being activated, and therefore a stronger muscle contraction. Motor unit recruitment is a measure of how many motor neurons are activated in a particular muscle, and therefore is a measure of how many muscle fibers of that muscle are activated. The higher the recruitment the stronger the muscle contraction will be. Motor units are generally recruited in order of smallest to largest (smallest motor neurons to largest motor neurons, and thus slow to fast twitch) as contraction increases. This is known as 66:(IPSP) amplitudes from small to large motoneurons. This seemed to confirm Henneman's idea, but Burke disagreed, pointing out that larger neurons with a larger surface area had space for more synapses. Burke eventually showed (in a very small sample of neurons) that smaller motoneurons have a greater number of synaptic inputs from a single input source. The topic is probably still regarded as controversial. 20: 125:
low levels of recruitment, the force increment due to recruitment is small, whereas in forceful contractions, the force increment becomes much larger. Thus the ratio between the force increment produced by adding another motor unit and the force threshold at which that unit is recruited remains relatively constant.
116:. Generally, this allows a 2 to 4-fold change in force. In general, the motor unit firing rate of each individual motor unit increases with increasing muscular effort until a maximum rate is reached. This smooths out the incremental force changes which would otherwise occur as each additional unit was recruited. 97:
told me several times in conversation that he thought classifying motor units into distinct categories was probably a bad idea because, unless used with care, classifications tend to distort reality. I agreed, and still do, that taxonomies can lead to overly rigid thinking (and sometimes even lack of
111:
The force produced by a single motor unit is determined in part by the number of muscle fibers in the unit. Another important determinant of force is the frequency with which the muscle fibers are stimulated by their innervating axon. The rate at which the nerve impulses arrive is known as the motor
102:
If a correlation were to be drawn between Henneman's size principle and the motor unit categorization of Burke regarding the order of motor unit recruitment, it would resemble the following order: the smallest units, S (slow), would be recruited first, followed by larger FR (fast, resistant) units,
124:
The distribution of motor unit size is such that there is an inverse relationship between the number of motor units and the force each generates (i.e., the number of muscle fibers per motor unit). Thus, there are many small motor units and progressively fewer larger motor units. This means that at
85:
Another topic of controversy resides in the way in which Burke and colleagues categorized motor unit types. They designated three general groups by which motor units could be categorized: S (slow – slow twitch), FR (fast, resistant – fast twitch, fatigue-resistant), and FF (fast, fatigable – fast
73:" of motoneurons, while other motor unit types may be involved in "lower duty cycles." However, they state that the evidence is not conclusive "to support or deny the intuitively appealing notion that there is a  correlation between metabolic activity, motoneuron size, and motor unit type." 76:
Under some circumstances, the normal order of motor unit recruitment may be altered, such that small motor units cease to fire and larger ones may be recruited. This is thought to be due to the interaction of excitatory and inhibitory motoneuronal inputs.
62:(EPSPs) would result in a higher voltage change (depolarization) across the neuronal membrane of the smaller motor neurons and therefore larger EPSPs in smaller motoneurons. Burke later demonstrated that there was a graded decrease of both EPSP and 86:
twitch, fatigable). These designations have served as the basis for motor unit categorization since their conception, but modern research indicates that human motor units are more complex and possibly do not directly fit this model.
220:
Bodine-Fowler, S., Garfinkel, A., Roy, Roland R., and Edgerton, V. Reggie. Spatial distribution of muscle fibers within the territory of a motor unit. Muscle and Nerve 13:1133-1145, 1990. - non-random distribution of
210:
Ounjian, M., R.R. Roy, E. Eldred, A Garfinkel, J.R. Payne, A. Armstrong, A. Toga, and V.R. Edgerton Physiological and Developmental Implications of Motor Unit Anatomy. J. Neurobiol. 22:547-559, 1991. Motor unit
273:
Burke, R.E.; Dum, R.P.; Fleshman, J.W.; Glenn, L.L.; Lev-Tov, A.; O'Donovan, M.J.; Pinter, M.J. (1982). "A HRP study of the relation between cell size and motor unit type in cat ankle extensor motoneurons".
251:
Burke RE, Rymer WZ & Walsh JR. Relative strength of synaptic input from short-latency pathways to motor units of defined type in cat medial gastrocnemius. J Neurophysiol. 1976 May;39(3):447-58.
316:
Garnett, R. & Stephens, JA. The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. J. Physiol. Land. 303: 351-364, 1980.
98:
thinking) but they are necessary for communication, which requires that things be named; and scientific communication demands that things be named precisely, according to their attributes.
69:
In their 1982 paper, Burke and colleagues propose that the small cell size and high surface-to-volume ratio of S motor units allows for greater metabolic activity, optimized for the "
335:
Burke, R.E.; Levine, D.N.; Zajac, F.E.; Tsairis, P.; Engel, W.K. (1971). "Mammalian Motor Units: Physiological-Histochemical Correlation in Three Types in Cat Gastrocnemius".
184:
Betts, J Gordon; Desaix, Peter; Johnson, Eddie; Johnson, Jody E; Korol, Oksana; Kruse, Dean; Poe, Brandon; Wise, James; Womble, Mark D; Young, Kelly A (June 7, 2023).
35: 325:
Kanda, K., Burke, R. E., & Walmsley, B. Differential control of fast and slow twitch motor units in the decerebrate cat. Exp. Brain Res. 29:57-74, 1977.
137:
for a patient with weakness, careful analysis of the "motor unit action potential" (MUAP) size, shape, and recruitment pattern can help in distinguishing a
70: 112:
unit firing rate and may vary from frequencies low enough to produce a series of single twitch contractions to frequencies high enough to produce a fused
242:
Henneman, E., Somjen, G. & Carpenter, D. O. (1965). Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 599-620.
58:
was that the smaller motor neurons had a smaller surface area and therefore a higher membrane resistance. He predicted that the current generated by an
233:
Henneman, E., Somjen, G. & Carpenter, D. O. (1965). Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 560-580.
260:
Burke RE, Walmsley B, Hodgson JA. HRP anatomy of group Ia afferent contacts on alpha motoneurones. Brain Res. 1979 Jan 12;160(2):347-52
185: 473:
Hodson-Tole, E.F.; Wakeling, J.M. (2009). "Motor unit recruitment for dynamic tasks: current understanding and future directions".
103:
and lastly the largest FF (fast, fatigable) units, reserved for high-energy tasks that require additional motor unit recruitment.
195: 438: 63: 59: 589: 154: 55: 43: 569: 134: 23:
General depiction of a motor unit, consisting of a motor neuron innervating a group of muscle fibers.
573: 89:
However, it is important to note that Burke himself recognized the risk in classifying motor units:
594: 344: 556:
Carlo J DeLuca. Control Properties of Motor Units. J. exp. Biol. 115, 125-136 (1985) \ 25.
8: 113: 348: 516:
Conwit, R. A.; Stashuk, D.; Tracy, B.; McHugh, M.; Brown, W. F.; Metter, E. J. (1999).
498: 368: 299: 534: 517: 430: 539: 490: 434: 403: 360: 291: 191: 372: 529: 502: 482: 426: 395: 352: 283: 303: 356: 94: 486: 583: 177: 543: 494: 407: 364: 295: 287: 399: 190:. Houston: OpenStax CNX. 10.3 Muscle Fiber Contraction and Relaxation. 164: 142: 31: 16:
Additional activation of motor units to increase contractile strength
454:
Henneman, E. "Skeletal muscle: the servant of the nervous system".
159: 138: 375:– via American Association for the Advancement of Science. 425:. Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 123. pp. 167–175. 39: 386:
Heckman, CJ; Enoka, R.M. (2012). Terjung (ed.). "Motor Unit".
19: 518:"The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force" 183: 515: 334: 119: 423:
Chapter 15 Revisiting the notion of 'motor unit types'
272: 54:
Henneman proposed that the mechanism underlying the
49: 472: 80: 581: 106: 385: 128: 229: 227: 572:at the U.S. National Library of Medicine 533: 421:Burke, R.E. (1999). Binder, M.D. (ed.). 18: 224: 582: 420: 453: 276:The Journal of Comparative Neurology 268: 266: 120:Proportional control of muscle force 13: 14: 606: 563: 263: 64:inhibitory postsynaptic potential 60:excitatory postsynaptic potential 50:Neuronal mechanism of recruitment 30:is the activation of additional 550: 509: 466: 447: 414: 379: 328: 319: 81:Recruitment of motor unit types 310: 254: 245: 236: 214: 204: 1: 535:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00054-1 431:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62854-X 170: 34:to accomplish an increase in 357:10.1126/science.174.4010.709 155:Motor unit number estimation 7: 148: 107:Rate coding of muscle force 10: 611: 487:10.1007/s00360-008-0289-1 135:electrodiagnostic testing 129:Electrodiagnostic testing 44:Henneman's size principle 574:Medical Subject Headings 522:Clinical Neurophysiology 388:Comprehensive Physiology 187:Anatomy & Physiology 570:Recruitment,+Motor+Unit 100: 28:Motor unit recruitment 24: 288:10.1002/cne.902090103 91: 22: 590:Somatic motor system 400:10.1002/cphy.c100087 36:contractile strength 349:1971Sci...174..709B 114:tetanic contraction 93:My friend the late 71:highest duty cycles 456:Medical Physiology 25: 343:(4010): 709–712. 197:978-1-947172-04-3 602: 557: 554: 548: 547: 537: 528:(7): 1270–1275. 513: 507: 506: 475:J Comp Physiol B 470: 464: 463: 451: 445: 444: 418: 412: 411: 394:(4): 2629–2682. 383: 377: 376: 332: 326: 323: 317: 314: 308: 307: 270: 261: 258: 252: 249: 243: 240: 234: 231: 222: 218: 212: 208: 202: 201: 181: 610: 609: 605: 604: 603: 601: 600: 599: 580: 579: 566: 561: 560: 555: 551: 514: 510: 471: 467: 452: 448: 441: 419: 415: 384: 380: 333: 329: 324: 320: 315: 311: 271: 264: 259: 255: 250: 246: 241: 237: 232: 225: 219: 215: 209: 205: 198: 182: 178: 173: 151: 131: 122: 109: 95:Elwood Henneman 83: 52: 17: 12: 11: 5: 608: 598: 597: 592: 578: 577: 565: 564:External links 562: 559: 558: 549: 508: 465: 446: 439: 413: 378: 327: 318: 309: 262: 253: 244: 235: 223: 213: 203: 196: 175: 174: 172: 169: 168: 167: 162: 157: 150: 147: 130: 127: 121: 118: 108: 105: 82: 79: 56:size principle 51: 48: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 607: 596: 595:Motor control 593: 591: 588: 587: 585: 575: 571: 568: 567: 553: 545: 541: 536: 531: 527: 523: 519: 512: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 469: 461: 457: 450: 442: 440:9780444502889 436: 432: 428: 424: 417: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 382: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 331: 322: 313: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 269: 267: 257: 248: 239: 230: 228: 217: 207: 199: 193: 189: 188: 180: 176: 166: 163: 161: 158: 156: 153: 152: 146: 144: 140: 136: 126: 117: 115: 104: 99: 96: 90: 87: 78: 74: 72: 67: 65: 61: 57: 47: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 21: 552: 525: 521: 511: 481:(1): 57–66. 478: 474: 468: 459: 455: 449: 422: 416: 391: 387: 381: 340: 336: 330: 321: 312: 282:(1): 17–28. 279: 275: 256: 247: 238: 216: 206: 186: 179: 132: 123: 110: 101: 92: 88: 84: 75: 68: 53: 27: 26: 133:In medical 32:motor units 584:Categories 462:: 674–741. 211:territory. 171:References 165:Neuropathy 143:neuropathy 544:10423192 495:18597095 408:23720261 373:42638100 160:Myopathy 149:See also 139:myopathy 503:6546752 365:4107849 345:Bibcode 337:Science 296:7119171 221:fibers. 141:from a 576:(MeSH) 542:  501:  493:  437:  406:  371:  363:  304:601035 302:  294:  194:  40:muscle 499:S2CID 369:S2CID 300:S2CID 38:in a 540:PMID 491:PMID 435:ISBN 404:PMID 361:PMID 292:PMID 192:ISBN 530:doi 526:110 483:doi 479:179 427:doi 396:doi 353:doi 341:174 284:doi 280:209 586:: 538:. 524:. 520:. 497:. 489:. 477:. 458:. 433:. 402:. 390:. 367:. 359:. 351:. 339:. 298:. 290:. 278:. 265:^ 226:^ 145:. 46:. 546:. 532:: 505:. 485:: 460:1 443:. 429:: 410:. 398:: 392:2 355:: 347:: 306:. 286:: 200:.

Index


motor units
contractile strength
muscle
Henneman's size principle
size principle
excitatory postsynaptic potential
inhibitory postsynaptic potential
highest duty cycles
Elwood Henneman
tetanic contraction
electrodiagnostic testing
myopathy
neuropathy
Motor unit number estimation
Myopathy
Neuropathy
Anatomy & Physiology
ISBN
978-1-947172-04-3




doi
10.1002/cne.902090103
PMID
7119171
S2CID
601035

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.