Knowledge

Multibody system

Source đź“ť

850:
the other bodies. For example, 18 coordinates and 17 constraints could be used to describe the motion of the slider-crank with rigid bodies. However, as there is only one degree of freedom, the equation of motion could be also represented by means of one equation and one degree of freedom, using e.g. the angle of the driving link as degree of freedom. The latter formulation has then the minimum number of coordinates in order to describe the motion of the system and can be thus called a minimal coordinates formulation. The transformation of redundant coordinates to minimal coordinates is sometimes cumbersome and only possible in the case of holonomic constraints and without kinematical loops. Several algorithms have been developed for the derivation of minimal coordinate equations of motion, to mention only the so-called recursive formulation. The resulting equations are easier to be solved because in the absence of constraint conditions, standard time integration methods can be used to integrate the equations of motion in time. While the reduced system might be solved more efficiently, the transformation of the coordinates might be computationally expensive. In very general multibody system formulations and software systems, redundant coordinates are used in order to make the systems user-friendly and flexible.
164: 176: 250:
or a body and the ground. This is for example the case of a rolling disc, where the point of the disc that contacts the ground has always zero relative velocity with respect to the ground. In the case that the velocity constraint condition cannot be integrated in time in order to form a position constraint, it is called non-
849:
The equations of motion (1,2) are represented by means of redundant coordinates, meaning that the coordinates are not independent. This can be exemplified by the slider-crank mechanism shown above, where each body has six degrees of freedom while most of the coordinates are dependent on the motion of
249:
implies a restriction in the kinematical degrees of freedom of one or more bodies. The classical constraint is usually an algebraic equation that defines the relative translation or rotation between two bodies. There are furthermore possibilities to constrain the relative velocity between two bodies
157:
The following example shows a typical multibody system. It is usually denoted as slider-crank mechanism. The mechanism is used to transform rotational motion into translational motion by means of a rotating driving beam, a connection rod and a sliding body. In the present example, a flexible body is
187:
A body is usually considered to be a rigid or flexible part of a mechanical system (not to be confused with the human body). An example of a body is the arm of a robot, a wheel or axle in a car or the human forearm. A link is the connection of two or more bodies, or a body with the ground. The link
257:
In addition to that there are non-classical constraints that might even introduce a new unknown coordinate, such as a sliding joint, where a point of a body is allowed to move along the surface of another body. In the case of contact, the constraint condition is based on inequalities and therefore
266:
The equations of motion are used to describe the dynamic behavior of a multibody system. Each multibody system formulation may lead to a different mathematical appearance of the equations of motion while the physics behind is the same. The motion of the constrained bodies is described by means of
65:
behavior results from the equilibrium of applied forces and the rate of change of momentum. Nowadays, the term multibody system is related to a large number of engineering fields of research, especially in robotics and vehicle dynamics. As an important feature, multibody system formalisms usually
233:
A rigid body has six degrees of freedom in the case of general spatial motion, three of them translational degrees of freedom and three rotational degrees of freedom. In the case of planar motion, a body has only three degrees of freedom with only one rotational and two translational degrees of
377: 158:
used for the connection rod. The sliding mass is not allowed to rotate and three revolute joints are used to connect the bodies. While each body has six degrees of freedom in space, the kinematical conditions lead to one degree of freedom for the whole system.
74:
While single bodies or parts of a mechanical system are studied in detail with finite element methods, the behavior of the whole multibody system is usually studied with multibody system methods within the following areas:
267:
equations that result basically from Newton’s second law. The equations are written for general motion of the single bodies with the addition of constraint conditions. Usually the equations of motions are derived from the
840:
and usually represents a force or a moment, which acts in “direction” of the constraint degree of freedom. The Lagrange multipliers do no "work" as compared to external forces that change the potential energy of a body.
443:
These types of equations of motion are based on so-called redundant coordinates, because the equations use more coordinates than degrees of freedom of the underlying system. The generalized coordinates are denoted by
437: 858:
There are several cases in which it is necessary to consider the flexibility of the bodies. For example in cases where flexibility plays a fundamental role in kinematics as well as in compliant mechanisms.
229:
denote the number of independent kinematical possibilities to move. In other words, degrees of freedom are the minimum number of parameters required to completely define the position of an entity in space.
284: 237:
The degrees of freedom in planar motion can be easily demonstrated using a computer mouse. The degrees of freedom are: left-right, forward-backward and the rotation about the vertical axis.
501: 869:
Modal condensation, in which elasticity is described through a finite number of modes of vibration of the body by exploiting the degrees of freedom linked to the amplitude of the mode
655: 600: 578: 767: 738: 701: 552: 805: 679: 523: 464: 838: 872:
Full flex, all the flexibility of the body is taken into account by discretize body in sub elements with singles displacement linked from elastic material properties
866:
Discrete flexible multibody, the flexible body is divided into a set of rigid bodies connected by elastic stiffnesses representative of the body's elasticity
66:
offer an algorithmic, computer-aided way to model, analyze, simulate and optimize the arbitrary motion of possibly thousands of interconnected bodies.
38:
The systematic treatment of the dynamic behavior of interconnected bodies has led to a large number of important multibody formalisms in the field of
927:
J. GarcĂ­a de JalĂłn, E. Bayo, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems - The Real-Time Challenge, Springer-Verlag, New York (1994).
386: 558:) is the derivative of the constraint conditions with respect to the coordinates. This matrix is used to apply constraint forces 939:
T. Wasfy and A. Noor, "Computational strategies for flexible multibody systems," ASME. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2003;56(6):553-613.
372:{\displaystyle \mathbf {M(q)} {\ddot {\mathbf {q} }}-\mathbf {Q} _{v}+\mathbf {C_{q}} ^{T}\mathbf {\lambda } =\mathbf {F} ,} 50:(rigid body). Euler introduced reaction forces between bodies. Later, a series of formalisms were derived, only to mention 188:
is defined by certain (kinematical) constraints that restrict the relative motion of the bodies. Typical constraints are:
936:
E. Eich-Soellner, C. FĂĽhrer, Numerical Methods in Multibody Dynamics, Teubner, Stuttgart, 1998 (reprint Lund, 2008).
769:
includes quadratic terms of velocities and it results due to partial derivatives of the kinetic energy of the body.
201:; relative displacement along one axis is allowed, constrains relative rotation; implies 5 kinematical constraints 555: 213:; constrains relative displacements in one point, relative rotation is allowed; implies 3 kinematical constraints 22:
is the study of the dynamic behavior of interconnected rigid or flexible bodies, each of which may undergo large
473: 602:
are also denoted as Lagrange multipliers. In a rigid body, possible coordinates could be split into two parts,
226: 607: 583: 561: 933:
M. Géradin, A. Cardona, Flexible multibody dynamics – A finite element approach, Wiley, New York (2001).
921:
E.J. Haug, Computer-Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems, Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1989).
977: 90: 743: 714: 684: 528: 175: 740:
is used to describe Coriolis and centrifugal terms in the equations of motion. The name is because
924:
H. Bremer and F. Pfeiffer, Elastische Mehrkörpersysteme, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany (1992).
783: 662: 506: 447: 217:
There are two important terms in multibody systems: degree of freedom and constraint condition.
207:; only one relative rotation is allowed; implies 5 kinematical constraints; see the example above 54:’s formalisms based on minimal coordinates and a second formulation that introduces constraints. 268: 810: 251: 79: 51: 23: 148:
of vehicles, improvement of stability, comfort optimization, improvement of efficiency, ...)
887: 272: 246: 930:
A.A. Shabana, Dynamics of multibody systems, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons (1998).
8: 778: 62: 862:
Flexibility could be take in account in different way. There are three main approaches:
972: 882: 103: 145: 124: 918:
P.E. Nikravesh, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall (1988).
82:(helicopter, landing gears, behavior of machines under different gravity conditions) 940: 141: 258:
such a constraint does not permanently restrict the degrees of freedom of bodies.
163: 210: 198: 893: 204: 130: 108: 47: 905:
J. Wittenburg, Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, Teubner, Stuttgart (1977).
966: 192: 85: 43: 170:
The motion of the mechanism can be viewed in the following gif animation:
915:
K. Magnus, Dynamics of multibody systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1978).
467: 94: 16:
Tool to study dynamic behavior of interconnected rigid or flexible bodies
42:. The simplest bodies or elements of a multibody system were treated by 580:
to the according equations of the bodies. The components of the vector
116: 98: 27: 944: 711:
In the case of rigid bodies, the so-called quadratic velocity vector
58: 39: 957: 135: 112: 432:{\displaystyle \mathbf {C} (\mathbf {q} ,{\dot {\mathbf {q} }})=0} 958:
http://real.uwaterloo.ca/~mbody/ Collected links of John McPhee
254:. This is the case for the general rolling constraint. 57:
Basically, the motion of bodies is described by their
813: 786: 746: 717: 687: 665: 610: 586: 564: 531: 509: 476: 450: 389: 287: 525:
represents the constraint conditions and the matrix
278:
The motion of rigid bodies is described by means of
832: 799: 761: 732: 695: 673: 649: 594: 572: 546: 517: 495: 458: 431: 371: 503:which may depend on the generalized coordinates. 298: 292: 964: 195:or Universal Joint; 4 kinematical constraints 706: 496:{\displaystyle \mathbf {M} (\mathbf {q} )} 772: 240: 965: 844: 650:{\displaystyle \mathbf {q} =\left^{T}} 261: 853: 807:is related to a constraint condition 220: 595:{\displaystyle \mathbf {\lambda } } 573:{\displaystyle \mathbf {\lambda } } 13: 14: 989: 951: 127:(granular media, sand, molecules) 762:{\displaystyle \mathbf {Q} _{v}} 749: 733:{\displaystyle \mathbf {Q} _{v}} 720: 696:{\displaystyle \mathbf {\Psi } } 689: 667: 632: 626: 612: 547:{\displaystyle \mathbf {C_{q}} } 538: 534: 511: 486: 478: 452: 410: 399: 391: 362: 341: 337: 321: 306: 295: 289: 174: 162: 630: 69: 33: 910:Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 490: 482: 420: 395: 1: 899: 800:{\displaystyle \lambda _{i}} 681:represents translations and 674:{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} } 518:{\displaystyle \mathbf {C} } 459:{\displaystyle \mathbf {q} } 7: 876: 93:, gears and transmissions, 10: 994: 182: 152: 707:Quadratic velocity vector 703:describes the rotations. 912:Berlin, Springer (2008). 833:{\displaystyle C_{i}=0} 834: 801: 763: 734: 697: 675: 651: 596: 574: 554:(sometimes termed the 548: 519: 497: 460: 433: 373: 269:Newton-Euler equations 890:(solution techniques) 835: 802: 764: 735: 698: 676: 652: 597: 575: 549: 520: 498: 461: 434: 374: 121:Military applications 80:Aerospace engineering 888:Multibody simulation 811: 784: 773:Lagrange multipliers 744: 715: 685: 663: 608: 584: 562: 529: 507: 474: 448: 387: 285: 273:Lagrange’s equations 247:constraint condition 241:Constraint condition 140:Vehicle simulation ( 46:(free particle) and 845:Minimal coordinates 779:Lagrange multiplier 262:Equations of motion 125:Particle simulation 883:Dynamic simulation 854:Flexible multibody 830: 797: 759: 730: 693: 671: 647: 592: 570: 544: 515: 493: 470:is represented by 456: 429: 369: 227:degrees of freedom 104:Dynamic simulation 978:Dynamical systems 945:10.1115/1.1590354 417: 313: 221:Degree of freedom 146:rapid prototyping 91:Combustion engine 985: 839: 837: 836: 831: 823: 822: 806: 804: 803: 798: 796: 795: 768: 766: 765: 760: 758: 757: 752: 739: 737: 736: 731: 729: 728: 723: 702: 700: 699: 694: 692: 680: 678: 677: 672: 670: 656: 654: 653: 648: 646: 645: 640: 636: 635: 629: 615: 601: 599: 598: 593: 591: 579: 577: 576: 571: 569: 553: 551: 550: 545: 543: 542: 541: 524: 522: 521: 516: 514: 502: 500: 499: 494: 489: 481: 465: 463: 462: 457: 455: 438: 436: 435: 430: 419: 418: 413: 408: 402: 394: 378: 376: 375: 370: 365: 357: 352: 351: 346: 345: 344: 330: 329: 324: 315: 314: 309: 304: 301: 178: 166: 142:vehicle dynamics 20:Multibody system 993: 992: 988: 987: 986: 984: 983: 982: 963: 962: 954: 908:J. Wittenburg, 902: 879: 856: 847: 818: 814: 812: 809: 808: 791: 787: 785: 782: 781: 775: 753: 748: 747: 745: 742: 741: 724: 719: 718: 716: 713: 712: 709: 688: 686: 683: 682: 666: 664: 661: 660: 641: 631: 625: 624: 620: 619: 611: 609: 606: 605: 587: 585: 582: 581: 565: 563: 560: 559: 537: 533: 532: 530: 527: 526: 510: 508: 505: 504: 485: 477: 475: 472: 471: 451: 449: 446: 445: 409: 407: 406: 398: 390: 388: 385: 384: 361: 353: 347: 340: 336: 335: 334: 325: 320: 319: 305: 303: 302: 288: 286: 283: 282: 264: 243: 223: 211:spherical joint 199:prismatic joint 185: 155: 72: 36: 30:displacements. 17: 12: 11: 5: 991: 981: 980: 975: 961: 960: 953: 952:External links 950: 949: 948: 937: 934: 931: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 906: 901: 898: 897: 896: 894:Physics engine 891: 885: 878: 875: 874: 873: 870: 867: 855: 852: 846: 843: 829: 826: 821: 817: 794: 790: 774: 771: 756: 751: 727: 722: 708: 705: 691: 669: 644: 639: 634: 628: 623: 618: 614: 590: 568: 540: 536: 513: 492: 488: 484: 480: 454: 441: 440: 428: 425: 422: 416: 412: 405: 401: 397: 393: 381: 380: 368: 364: 360: 356: 350: 343: 339: 333: 328: 323: 318: 312: 308: 300: 297: 294: 291: 263: 260: 242: 239: 222: 219: 215: 214: 208: 205:revolute joint 202: 196: 184: 181: 180: 179: 168: 167: 154: 151: 150: 149: 138: 133: 131:Physics engine 128: 122: 119: 106: 101: 88: 83: 71: 68: 61:behavior. The 35: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 990: 979: 976: 974: 971: 970: 968: 959: 956: 955: 946: 942: 938: 935: 932: 929: 926: 923: 920: 917: 914: 911: 907: 904: 903: 895: 892: 889: 886: 884: 881: 880: 871: 868: 865: 864: 863: 860: 851: 842: 827: 824: 819: 815: 792: 788: 780: 770: 754: 725: 704: 657: 642: 637: 621: 616: 603: 588: 566: 557: 469: 426: 423: 414: 403: 383: 382: 366: 358: 354: 348: 331: 326: 316: 310: 281: 280: 279: 276: 274: 270: 259: 255: 253: 248: 238: 235: 231: 228: 218: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 190: 189: 177: 173: 172: 171: 165: 161: 160: 159: 147: 143: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 126: 123: 120: 118: 114: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 96: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 78: 77: 76: 67: 64: 60: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 31: 29: 25: 24:translational 21: 909: 861: 857: 848: 776: 710: 658: 604: 442: 277: 265: 256: 244: 236: 232: 224: 216: 193:cardan joint 186: 169: 156: 86:Biomechanics 73: 70:Applications 56: 37: 34:Introduction 19: 18: 468:mass matrix 95:chain drive 967:Categories 900:References 117:paper mill 99:belt drive 28:rotational 973:Mechanics 789:λ 690:Ψ 633:Ψ 589:λ 567:λ 415:˙ 355:λ 317:− 311:¨ 252:holonomic 234:freedom. 59:kinematic 40:mechanics 877:See also 556:Jacobian 136:Robotics 113:conveyor 52:Lagrange 183:Concept 153:Example 63:dynamic 659:where 466:, the 44:Newton 109:Hoist 48:Euler 777:The 225:The 26:and 941:doi 439:(2) 379:(1) 271:or 969:: 275:. 245:A 144:, 115:, 111:, 97:, 947:. 943:: 828:0 825:= 820:i 816:C 793:i 755:v 750:Q 726:v 721:Q 668:u 643:T 638:] 627:u 622:[ 617:= 613:q 539:q 535:C 512:C 491:) 487:q 483:( 479:M 453:q 427:0 424:= 421:) 411:q 404:, 400:q 396:( 392:C 367:, 363:F 359:= 349:T 342:q 338:C 332:+ 327:v 322:Q 307:q 299:) 296:q 293:( 290:M

Index

translational
rotational
mechanics
Newton
Euler
Lagrange
kinematic
dynamic
Aerospace engineering
Biomechanics
Combustion engine
chain drive
belt drive
Dynamic simulation
Hoist
conveyor
paper mill
Particle simulation
Physics engine
Robotics
vehicle dynamics
rapid prototyping
Slidercrank
Slidercrank-animation
cardan joint
prismatic joint
revolute joint
spherical joint
degrees of freedom
constraint condition

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑