29:
97:, which two or more concurrent threads are trying to modify (where two concurrent read operations are permitted but, no two concurrent write operations or one read and one write are permitted, since it leads to data inconsistency). Mutual exclusion algorithms ensure that if a process is already performing write operation on a data object no other process/thread is allowed to access/modify the same object until the first process has finished writing upon the data object and released the object for other processes to read and write upon.
294:
548:
section to experience an unrecoverable error or otherwise be unable to continue. If such a failure occurs, conventional, non-failure-tolerant mutual exclusion algorithms may deadlock or otherwise fail key liveness properties. To deal with this problem, several solutions using crash-recovery mechanisms have been proposed.
414:
in the linked list during the insertion of a new node. Only one process can be successful in its CAS; all other processes attempting to add a node at the same time will have to try again. Each process can then keep a local copy of the data structure, and upon traversing the linked list, can perform
367:
will drift every time a critical section is executed because the timer interrupt is no longer serviced, so tracking time is impossible during the critical section. Also, if a process halts during its critical section, control will never be returned to another process, effectively halting the entire
277:
gives a more precise commitment than lockout-freedom. Lockout-freedom ensures every process can access the critical section eventually: it gives no guarantee about how long the wait will be. In practice, a process could be overtaken an arbitrary or unbounded number of times by other higher-priority
333:
If a process wishes to enter the critical section, it must first execute the trying section and wait until it acquires access to the critical section. After the process has executed its critical section and is finished with the shared resources, it needs to execute the exit section to release them
547:
Most algorithms for mutual exclusion are designed with the assumption that no failure occurs while a process is running inside the critical section. However, in reality such failures may be commonplace. For example, a sudden loss of power or faulty interconnect might cause a process in a critical
390:
on a location in shared memory, and since the operation is atomic, only one process can set the flag at a time. Any process that is unsuccessful in setting the flag can either go on to do other tasks and try again later, release the processor to another process and try again later, or continue to
221:
The problem which mutual exclusion addresses is a problem of resource sharing: how can a software system control multiple processes' access to a shared resource, when each process needs exclusive control of that resource while doing its work? The mutual-exclusion solution to this makes the shared
484:
and busy-waits by using queuing and context switches. However, if the time that is spent suspending a thread and then restoring it can be proven to be always more than the time that must be waited for a thread to become ready to run after being blocked in a particular situation, then
501:
register is sufficient to provide the deadlock-free solution to the mutual exclusion problem. But a solution built with a test&set register can possibly lead to the starvation of some processes which become caught in the trying section. In fact,
265:
waiting process be able to get access to the critical section, but does not require that every process gets a turn. If two processes continually trade a resource between them, a third process could be locked out and experience
479:
and swap it out with another thread that is ready to be run, or could put that processor into a low power state if there is no other thread that can be run. Therefore, most modern mutual exclusion methods attempt to reduce
282:-bounded waiting property, each process has a finite maximum wait time. This works by setting a limit to the number of times other processes can cut in line, so that no process can enter the critical section more than
212:
The term mutual exclusion is also used in reference to the simultaneous writing of a memory address by one thread while the aforementioned memory address is being manipulated or read by one or more other threads.
144:). When such a linked list is being shared between multiple threads of execution, two threads of execution may attempt to remove two different nodes simultaneously, one thread of execution changing the
471:'s multithreading library, which will take advantage of hardware solutions if possible but will use software solutions if no hardware solutions exist. For example, when the operating system's
533:
246:: if processes are trying to enter the critical section, one of them must eventually be able to do so successfully, provided no process stays in the critical section permanently.
605:, in which one process gets a semaphore, another process gets a second semaphore, and then both wait till the other semaphore to be released. Other common side-effects include
104:
in his seminal 1965 paper "Solution of a problem in concurrent programming control", which is credited as the first topic in the study of concurrent algorithms.
270:, even though the system is not in deadlock. If a system is free of lockouts, it ensures that every process can get a turn at some point in the future.
290:
Every process's program can be partitioned into four sections, resulting in four states. Program execution cycles through these four states in order:
111:
of four items, where the second and third are to be removed. The removal of a node that sits between two other nodes is performed by changing the
82:
thread of execution is already accessing said critical section, which refers to an interval of time during which a thread of execution accesses a
226:. It controls access to the shared resource by controlling each mutual execution of that part of its program where the resource would be used.
209:) can be avoided by using the requirement of mutual exclusion to ensure that simultaneous updates to the same part of the list cannot occur.
613:, in which a higher-priority thread waits for a lower-priority thread; and high latency, in which response to interrupts is not prompt.
1150:
464:
is used on the platform that executes them. Programmers have to specify strict ordering on the memory operations within a thread.
973:
1135:
475:
library is used and a thread tries to acquire an already acquired lock, the operating system could suspend the thread using a
877:
792:
395:
is still possible, so this method allows the system to continue to function—even if a process halts while holding the lock.
1130:
1145:
257:
guarantees that any process wishing to enter the critical section will be able to do so eventually. This is distinct from
1114:
1100:
1086:
1072:
1037:
398:
Several other atomic operations can be used to provide mutual exclusion of data structures; most notable of these is
177:. Although both removal operations complete successfully, the desired state of the linked list is not achieved: node
411:
115:
620:. No perfect scheme is known. Blocking system calls used to sleep an entire process. Until such calls became
441:
267:
1170:
617:
363:). Although this solution is effective, it leads to many problems. If a critical section is long, then the
505:
991:
809:
677:
647:
602:
242:
446:
776:
774:
625:
305:
Operation is outside the critical section; the process is not using or requesting the shared resource.
657:
581:
356:
782:
771:
992:"Data Requirements for Implementation of N-Process Mutual Exclusion Using a Single Shared Variable"
329:
The process leaves the critical section and makes the shared resource available to other processes.
667:
637:
598:
576:
566:
560:
472:
436:
410:
where each node represents the desired operation to be performed. CAS is then used to change the
744:. In Proc. Distributed Computing, 18th international conference, DISC 2004. Vol 18, 56–70, 2004
461:
454:
392:
360:
616:
Much research is aimed at eliminating the above effects, often with the goal of guaranteeing
481:
431:
107:
A simple example of why mutual exclusion is important in practice can be visualized using a
28:
79:
8:
642:
606:
556:
The solutions explained above can be used to build the synchronization primitives below:
348:
63:
1043:
965:
942:
923:
832:
720:
610:
258:
108:
101:
71:
20:
1126:
1017:
1155:
1110:
1096:
1082:
1068:
1033:
873:
788:
836:
724:
423:
In addition to hardware-supported solutions, some software solutions exist that use
1047:
1025:
969:
957:
927:
913:
865:
824:
710:
624:, there was no proper mechanism for sleeping a single thread within a process (see
468:
399:
223:
222:
resource available only while the process is in a specific code segment called the
75:
55:
535:
distinct memory states are required to avoid lockout. To avoid unbounded waiting,
1139:
662:
586:
571:
380:
83:
334:
for other processes' use. The process then returns to its non-critical section.
476:
376:
250:
Deadlock freedom can be expanded to implement one or both of these properties:
229:
A successful solution to this problem must have at least these two properties:
67:
1164:
869:
621:
87:
1029:
1022:
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on
Principles of Distributed Computing
850:
754:
961:
652:
609:, in which a process never gets sufficient resources to run to completion;
498:
424:
387:
383:
364:
1127:
Common threads: POSIX threads explained – The little things called mutexes
918:
901:
715:
698:
741:
591:
407:
351:
systems, the simplest solution to achieve mutual exclusion is to disable
94:
467:
It is often preferable to use synchronization facilities provided by an
118:
of the previous node to point to the next node (in other words, if node
597:
Many forms of mutual exclusion have side-effects. For example, classic
100:
The requirement of mutual exclusion was first identified and solved by
16:
In computing, restricting data to be accessible by one thread at a time
828:
784:
Distributed computing: fundamentals, simulations, and advanced topics
403:
391:
loop while checking the flag until it is successful in acquiring it.
369:
352:
321:
The process is allowed to access the shared resource in this section.
368:
system. A more elegant method for achieving mutual exclusion is the
672:
486:
989:
293:
943:"The Design of a Multicore Extension of the SPIN Model Checker"
810:"The Mutual Exclusion Problem Part II: Statement and Solutions"
990:
Burns, James E.; Paul
Jackson, Nancy A. Lynch (January 1982),
140:, thereby removing from the linked list any reference to node
902:"A new solution of Dijkstra's concurrent programming problem"
406:
mutual exclusion for any shared data structure by creating a
237:: only one process can be in the critical section at a time.
355:
during a process's critical section. This will prevent any
359:
from running (effectively preventing a process from being
851:"A Pragmatic Implementation of Non-blocking Linked-lists"
699:"Solution of a problem in concurrent programming control"
941:
Holzmann, Gerard J.; Bosnacki, Dragan (1 October 2007).
940:
492:
386:
instruction provide the mutual exclusion. A process can
489:
are an acceptable solution (for that situation only).
1107:
Synchronization
Algorithms and Concurrent Programming
1015:
508:
19:
For the concept in logic and probability theory, see
759:
ACM Symposium on
Principles of Distributed Computing
551:
375:
Busy-waiting is effective for both uniprocessor and
66:, which is instituted for the purpose of preventing
313:
The process attempts to enter the critical section.
999:Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery
817:Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery
527:
736:
734:
1162:
1091:Thomas W. Christopher, George K. Thiruvathukal:
781:Attiya, Hagit; Welch, Jennifer (25 March 2004).
415:each operation from the list on its local copy.
162:, while another thread of execution changes the
1016:Golab, Wojciech; Ramaraju, Aditya (July 2016),
542:
427:to achieve mutual exclusion. Examples include:
43:, being removed simultaneously results in node
731:
1146:Mutual Exclusion with Locks – an Introduction
337:
780:
278:processes before it gets its turn. Under a
950:IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
917:
714:
451:Taubenfeld's black-white bakery algorithm
379:systems. The use of shared memory and an
297:the cycle of sections of a single process
1093:High-Performance Java Platform Computing
696:
292:
27:
1079:Distributed Mutual Exclusion Algorithms
899:
807:
1163:
848:
216:
860:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
539:distinct memory states are required.
493:Bound on the mutual exclusion problem
418:
342:
979:from the original on 9 October 2022.
755:"PODC Influential Paper Award: 2002"
528:{\displaystyle \Omega ({\sqrt {n}})}
1151:Mutual exclusion variants in OpenMP
13:
1057:
742:"The Black-White Bakery Algorithm"
509:
402:(CAS). CAS can be used to achieve
14:
1182:
1120:
1077:Sunil R. Das, Pradip K. Srimani:
552:Types of mutual exclusion devices
184:remains in the list, because the
70:. It is the requirement that one
1156:The Black-White Bakery Algorithm
808:Lamport, Leslie (26 June 2000),
460:These algorithms do not work if
1065:Algorithms for Mutual Exclusion
1009:
900:Lamport, Leslie (August 1974).
286:times while another is waiting.
1018:"Recoverable Mutual Exclusion"
983:
934:
893:
842:
801:
787:. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
747:
690:
522:
512:
1:
683:
543:Recoverable mutual exclusion
133:is changed to point to node
7:
849:Harris, Timothy L. (2001).
678:load-link/store-conditional
648:Dining philosophers problem
631:
122:is being removed, then the
10:
1187:
1142: (archived 2016-06-02)
1136:Mutual Exclusion Petri Net
442:Lamport's bakery algorithm
357:interrupt service routines
338:Enforcing mutual exclusion
275:k-bounded waiting property
18:
1109:, Pearson/Prentice Hall,
1081:, IEEE Computer Society,
906:Communications of the ACM
703:Communications of the ACM
658:Mutually exclusive events
93:The shared resource is a
870:10.1007/3-540-45414-4_21
697:Dijkstra, E. W. (1965).
1030:10.1145/2933057.2933087
638:Atomicity (programming)
205:This problem (called a
962:10.1109/TSE.2007.70724
529:
462:out-of-order execution
298:
261:, which requires that
51:
919:10.1145/361082.361093
858:Distributed Computing
716:10.1145/365559.365617
618:non-blocking progress
530:
447:Szymański's algorithm
296:
31:
567:Readers–writer locks
506:
437:Peterson's algorithm
302:Non-Critical Section
1171:Concurrency control
643:Concurrency control
455:Maekawa's algorithm
268:resource starvation
240:It must be free of
217:Problem description
72:thread of execution
64:concurrency control
1024:, pp. 65–74,
611:priority inversion
525:
432:Dekker's algorithm
419:Software solutions
343:Hardware solutions
299:
259:deadlock avoidance
233:It must implement
109:singly linked list
102:Edsger W. Dijkstra
52:
50:not being removed.
21:Mutual exclusivity
1105:Gadi Taubenfeld,
1095:, Prentice Hall,
879:978-3-540-42605-9
829:10.1145/5383.5384
794:978-0-471-45324-6
520:
170:to point to node
155:to point to node
62:is a property of
1178:
1051:
1050:
1013:
1007:
1006:
996:
987:
981:
980:
978:
947:
938:
932:
931:
921:
897:
891:
890:
888:
886:
855:
846:
840:
839:
814:
805:
799:
798:
778:
769:
768:
767:
765:
751:
745:
738:
729:
728:
718:
694:
534:
532:
531:
526:
521:
516:
469:operating system
400:compare-and-swap
318:Critical Section
235:mutual exclusion
224:critical section
201:
194:
188:pointer of node
183:
176:
169:
166:pointer of node
161:
154:
148:pointer of node
143:
139:
132:
126:pointer of node
121:
76:critical section
60:mutual exclusion
56:computer science
49:
42:
35:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1161:
1160:
1140:Wayback Machine
1123:
1063:Michel Raynal:
1060:
1058:Further reading
1055:
1054:
1040:
1014:
1010:
994:
988:
984:
976:
956:(10): 659–674.
945:
939:
935:
898:
894:
884:
882:
880:
853:
847:
843:
812:
806:
802:
795:
779:
772:
763:
761:
753:
752:
748:
739:
732:
695:
691:
686:
663:Reentrant mutex
634:
587:Message passing
572:Recursive locks
554:
545:
515:
507:
504:
503:
495:
421:
345:
340:
255:Lockout-freedom
219:
196:
195:points to node
189:
178:
171:
167:
156:
149:
141:
134:
127:
119:
84:shared resource
74:never enters a
68:race conditions
44:
37:
33:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1184:
1174:
1173:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1133:
1131:Daniel Robbins
1122:
1121:External links
1119:
1118:
1117:
1103:
1089:
1075:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1052:
1038:
1008:
982:
933:
912:(8): 453–455.
892:
878:
841:
823:(2): 313–348,
800:
793:
770:
746:
730:
688:
687:
685:
682:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
633:
630:
595:
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
553:
550:
544:
541:
524:
519:
514:
511:
494:
491:
477:context switch
458:
457:
452:
449:
444:
439:
434:
420:
417:
377:multiprocessor
344:
341:
339:
336:
331:
330:
327:
323:
322:
319:
315:
314:
311:
307:
306:
303:
288:
287:
271:
248:
247:
238:
218:
215:
207:race condition
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1183:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1116:
1115:0-13-197259-6
1112:
1108:
1104:
1102:
1101:0-13-016164-0
1098:
1094:
1090:
1088:
1087:0-8186-3380-8
1084:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1073:0-262-18119-3
1070:
1067:, MIT Press,
1066:
1062:
1061:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1039:9781450339643
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1012:
1004:
1000:
993:
986:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
944:
937:
929:
925:
920:
915:
911:
907:
903:
896:
881:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
852:
845:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
811:
804:
796:
790:
786:
785:
777:
775:
760:
756:
750:
743:
737:
735:
726:
722:
717:
712:
708:
704:
700:
693:
689:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
635:
629:
627:
623:
619:
614:
612:
608:
604:
600:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
562:
559:
558:
557:
549:
540:
538:
517:
500:
490:
488:
483:
478:
474:
470:
465:
463:
456:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
429:
428:
426:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
396:
394:
389:
385:
382:
378:
373:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:uni-processor
335:
328:
325:
324:
320:
317:
316:
312:
309:
308:
304:
301:
300:
295:
291:
285:
281:
276:
272:
269:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
245:
244:
239:
236:
232:
231:
230:
227:
225:
214:
210:
208:
203:
199:
192:
187:
181:
174:
165:
159:
152:
147:
137:
130:
125:
117:
114:
110:
105:
103:
98:
96:
91:
89:
88:shared memory
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
47:
40:
30:
26:
22:
1106:
1092:
1078:
1064:
1021:
1011:
1005:(2): 313–348
1002:
998:
985:
953:
949:
936:
909:
905:
895:
883:. Retrieved
861:
857:
844:
820:
816:
803:
783:
762:, retrieved
758:
749:
740:Taubenfeld,
706:
702:
692:
653:Exclusive or
615:
596:
555:
546:
536:
499:test&set
496:
466:
459:
425:busy waiting
422:
397:
388:test-and-set
384:test-and-set
374:
365:system clock
346:
332:
289:
283:
279:
274:
262:
254:
249:
241:
234:
228:
220:
211:
206:
204:
197:
190:
185:
179:
172:
163:
157:
150:
145:
135:
128:
123:
112:
106:
99:
92:
59:
53:
45:
38:
25:
864:: 300–314.
592:Tuple space
497:One binary
408:linked list
95:data object
32:Two nodes,
885:1 December
709:(9): 569.
684:References
622:threadsafe
607:starvation
599:semaphores
577:Semaphores
393:Preemption
353:interrupts
80:concurrent
764:24 August
668:Semaphore
603:deadlocks
563:(mutexes)
510:Ω
487:spinlocks
404:wait-free
370:busy-wait
361:preempted
243:deadlocks
1165:Category
974:Archived
837:12012739
725:19357737
673:Spinlock
632:See also
582:Monitors
412:pointers
78:while a
1138:at the
1048:8621532
970:9080331
928:8736023
626:polling
601:permit
482:latency
116:pointer
1113:
1099:
1085:
1071:
1046:
1036:
968:
926:
876:
835:
791:
723:
381:atomic
310:Trying
1129:" by
1044:S2CID
995:(PDF)
977:(PDF)
966:S2CID
946:(PDF)
924:S2CID
854:(PDF)
833:S2CID
813:(PDF)
721:S2CID
561:Locks
1111:ISBN
1097:ISBN
1083:ISBN
1069:ISBN
1034:ISBN
887:2022
874:ISBN
862:2180
789:ISBN
766:2009
473:lock
326:Exit
263:some
186:next
164:next
146:next
124:next
113:next
36:and
1026:doi
958:doi
914:doi
866:doi
825:doi
711:doi
628:).
347:On
200:+ 1
193:– 1
182:+ 1
175:+ 2
160:+ 1
153:– 1
138:+ 1
131:– 1
86:or
54:In
48:+ 1
41:+ 1
1167::
1042:,
1032:,
1020:,
1003:33
1001:,
997:,
972:.
964:.
954:33
952:.
948:.
922:.
910:17
908:.
904:.
872:.
856:.
831:,
821:33
819:,
815:,
773:^
757:,
733:^
719:.
705:.
701:.
372:.
273:A
202:.
90:.
58:,
1028::
960::
930:.
916::
889:.
868::
827::
797:.
727:.
713::
707:8
537:n
523:)
518:n
513:(
284:k
280:k
198:i
191:i
180:i
173:i
168:i
158:i
151:i
142:i
136:i
129:i
120:i
46:i
39:i
34:i
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
