Knowledge

Paradox of value

Source đź“ť

201:." The things which have the greatest value in use have frequently little or no value in exchange; on the contrary, those which have the greatest value in exchange have frequently little or no value in use. Nothing is more useful than water: but it will purchase scarcely anything; scarcely anything can be had in exchange for it. A diamond, on the contrary, has scarcely any use-value; but a very great quantity of other goods may frequently be had in exchange for it. 223: 1142: 25: 1132: 122: 261:
However, since water is in such large supply in the world, the marginal utility of water is low. In other words, people feel less urgency or enjoyment from consuming water since they know that water would continue to exist. Thus, consuming an extra unit of water would not generate an extra unit of usefulness and thus, an extra willingness to pay for it.
264:
Therefore, any particular unit of water is worth less to people as the supply of water increases. On the other hand, diamonds are in much lower supply. They are of such low supply that the usefulness of one additional diamond is greater than the usefulness of one additional glass of water, which is
256:
So, the value of the fifth bag of grain is equal to the satisfaction he gets from feeding the pigeons. If he sells that bag and neglects the pigeons, his least productive use of the remaining grain is to make whisky, so the value of a fourth bag of grain is the value of his whisky. Only if he loses
252:
With the first, he will make bread to survive. With the second, he will make more bread, in order to be strong enough to work. With the next, he will feed his farm animals. The next is used to make whisky, and the last one he feeds to the pigeons. If one of those bags is stolen, he will not reduce
260:
In explaining the diamond-water paradox, marginalists explain that it is not the total usefulness of diamonds or water that determines price, but the usefulness of each unit of water or diamonds. It is true that the total utility of water to people is tremendous, because they need it to survive.
192:
What are the rules which men naturally observe in exchanging them for money or for one another, I shall now proceed to examine. These rules determine what may be called the relative or exchangeable value of goods. The word VALUE, it is to be observed, has two different meanings, and sometimes
213:
Hence, Smith denied a necessary relationship between price and utility. Price on this view was related to a factor of production (namely, labor) and not to the point of view of the consumer. Proponents of the labor theory of value see that as the resolution of the paradox.
265:
in abundant supply. Thus, diamonds are worth more to people. Therefore, those who want diamonds are willing to pay a higher price for one diamond than for one glass of water, and sellers of diamonds ask a price for one diamond that is higher than for one glass of water.
226:
At low levels of consumption, water has a much higher marginal utility than diamonds and thus is more valuable. People usually consume water at much higher levels than they do diamonds and thus the marginal utility and price of water are lower than that of
245:. The marginal utility of a good is derived from its most important use to a person. So, if someone possesses a good, they will use it to satisfy some need or want, starting with the one that takes highest priority. 241:, says that the price at which an object trades in the market is determined neither by how much labor was exerted in its production nor on how useful it is on the whole. Rather, its price is determined by its 268:
Conversely, a man dying of thirst in a desert would have greater marginal use for water than for diamonds so would pay more for water, perhaps up to the point at which he was no longer dying.
125:
Water is a commodity that is essential to life. In the paradox of value, it is a contradiction that it is cheaper than diamonds, despite diamonds not having such an importance to life.
193:
expresses the utility of some particular object, and sometimes the power of purchasing other goods which the possession of that object conveys. The one may be called "
440:
A colonial farmer, whose log hut stands by itself in the primeval forest, far away from the busy haunts of men, has just harvested five sacks of corn...
341:
This 'paradox of value', as it was called, was frequently noted before Adam Smith (for example, by Copernicus who wrote a bit on economic questions)...
403:
Smith, Adam (1776). "Book I, Chapter V Of the Real and Nominal Price of Commodities, or of their Price in Labour, and their Price in Money".
209:
The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it.
578: 257:
four bags of grain will he start eating less; that is the most productive use of his grain. The last bag of grain is worth his life.
726: 89: 61: 1171: 1166: 469: 68: 787: 756: 593: 518: 366: 334: 305: 108: 42: 1012: 75: 1176: 46: 149:
is often considered to be the classic presenter of this paradox, although it had already appeared as early as
1005: 57: 829: 373:
Moreover, such writers as Locke, Law and Harris had contrasted the value of water with that of diamonds...
659: 141:
is on the whole more useful, in terms of survival, than diamonds, diamonds command a higher price in the
188:, he discusses the concepts of value in use and value in exchange, and notices how they tend to differ: 781: 721: 358: 238: 776: 849: 824: 664: 944: 431: 246: 1072: 1032: 909: 706: 624: 528: 523: 462: 35: 949: 839: 82: 1107: 1092: 1067: 1062: 990: 934: 914: 819: 654: 548: 184: 177: 150: 1112: 1097: 1087: 1052: 1000: 929: 844: 716: 711: 634: 629: 558: 165: 8: 874: 834: 798: 731: 598: 568: 563: 533: 498: 493: 321:
Gordon, Scott (1991). "Chapter 7: The Scottish Enlightenment of the eighteenth century".
277: 157: 1145: 1102: 1082: 1047: 1022: 995: 793: 746: 736: 694: 689: 649: 644: 553: 513: 455: 142: 418: 1135: 1117: 1057: 1037: 1027: 954: 939: 859: 854: 684: 679: 639: 508: 362: 330: 301: 1077: 1042: 1017: 894: 869: 864: 766: 741: 242: 253:
each of those activities by one-fifth; instead, he will stop feeding the pigeons.
985: 964: 959: 919: 761: 751: 588: 583: 573: 538: 924: 899: 889: 884: 814: 614: 503: 198: 205:
Furthermore, he explained the value in exchange as being determined by labor:
1160: 904: 771: 619: 701: 674: 669: 249:
illustrated this with the example of a farmer having five sacks of grain.
879: 232: 222: 385: 161: 146: 326: 194: 447: 24: 479: 121: 296:
Sandelin, Bo; Trautwein, Hans-Michael; Wundrak, Richard (2014).
405:
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
390:
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
185:
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
138: 543: 168:
and others had previously tried to explain the disparity.
323:
History and Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction
295: 434:(1891). "Book III, Chapter IV: The Marginal Utility". 430: 237:
The theory of marginal utility, which is based on the
49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1158: 463: 353:Blaug, Mark (1962). "Chapter 2: Adam Smith". 1131: 470: 456: 388:(1776). "Of the Origin and Use of Money". 300:. Milton Park: Routledge. pp. 23–24. 109:Learn how and when to remove this message 221: 171: 120: 16:Contradiction between utility and price 1159: 320: 477: 451: 419:Adam Smith and the division of labour 402: 384: 352: 378: 47:adding citations to reliable sources 18: 298:A Short History of Economic Thought 13: 788:What the Tortoise Said to Achilles 14: 1188: 1141: 1140: 1130: 137:) is the paradox that, although 23: 34:needs additional citations for 436:The Positive Theory of Capital 424: 411: 396: 346: 314: 289: 217: 1: 355:Economic Theory in Retrospect 283: 182:In a passage of Adam Smith's 7: 1172:Theory of value (economics) 1167:Paradoxes in utility theory 271: 10: 1193: 359:Cambridge University Press 239:subjective theory of value 230: 175: 1126: 978: 807: 607: 486: 417:Dhamee, Yousuf (1996?), 707:Paradoxes of set theory 1177:Paradoxes in economics 432:Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von 228: 211: 203: 126: 247:Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk 225: 207: 190: 178:Labor theory of value 172:Labor theory of value 135:diamond–water paradox 124: 1073:Kavka's toxin puzzle 845:Income and fertility 43:improve this article 732:Temperature paradox 655:Free choice paradox 519:Fitch's knowability 278:Paradox of hedonism 158:Nicolaus Copernicus 133:(also known as the 1108:Prisoner's dilemma 794:Heat death paradox 782:Unexpected hanging 747:Chicken or the egg 229: 145:. The philosopher 127: 58:"Paradox of value" 1154: 1153: 825:Arrow information 421:accessed 09/08/06 199:value in exchange 119: 118: 111: 93: 1184: 1144: 1143: 1134: 1133: 945:Service recovery 799:Olbers's paradox 499:Buridan's bridge 472: 465: 458: 449: 448: 443: 442: 428: 422: 415: 409: 408: 400: 394: 393: 382: 376: 375: 350: 344: 343: 318: 312: 311: 293: 243:marginal utility 131:paradox of value 114: 107: 103: 100: 94: 92: 51: 27: 19: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1150: 1122: 1033:Decision-making 979:Decision theory 974: 803: 727:Hilbert's Hotel 660:Grelling–Nelson 603: 482: 476: 446: 429: 425: 416: 412: 401: 397: 383: 379: 369: 351: 347: 337: 329:. p. 141. 319: 315: 308: 294: 290: 286: 274: 235: 220: 197:;" the other, " 180: 174: 115: 104: 98: 95: 52: 50: 40: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1190: 1180: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1152: 1151: 1149: 1148: 1138: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1003: 998: 988: 982: 980: 976: 975: 973: 972: 967: 962: 957: 952: 950:St. Petersburg 947: 942: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 887: 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 811: 809: 805: 804: 802: 801: 796: 791: 784: 779: 774: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 744: 739: 734: 729: 724: 719: 714: 709: 704: 699: 698: 697: 692: 687: 682: 677: 667: 662: 657: 652: 647: 642: 637: 632: 627: 622: 617: 611: 609: 605: 604: 602: 601: 596: 591: 586: 581: 579:Rule-following 576: 571: 566: 561: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 526: 521: 516: 511: 506: 504:Dream argument 501: 496: 490: 488: 484: 483: 475: 474: 467: 460: 452: 445: 444: 423: 410: 395: 377: 367: 361:. p. 39. 345: 335: 313: 306: 287: 285: 282: 281: 280: 273: 270: 231:Main article: 219: 216: 176:Main article: 173: 170: 117: 116: 31: 29: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1189: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1162: 1147: 1139: 1137: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1078:Morton's fork 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1018:Buridan's ass 1016: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 993: 992: 991:Apportionment 989: 987: 984: 983: 981: 977: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 850:Downs–Thomson 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 812: 810: 806: 800: 797: 795: 792: 789: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 767:Plato's beard 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 738: 735: 733: 730: 728: 725: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 710: 708: 705: 703: 700: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 672: 671: 668: 666: 665:Kleene–Rosser 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 612: 610: 606: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 589:Theseus' ship 587: 585: 582: 580: 577: 575: 572: 570: 567: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 549:Mere addition 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 500: 497: 495: 492: 491: 489: 487:Philosophical 485: 481: 473: 468: 466: 461: 459: 454: 453: 450: 441: 437: 433: 427: 420: 414: 406: 399: 391: 387: 381: 374: 370: 368:0-521-57701-2 364: 360: 356: 349: 342: 338: 336:0-415-09670-7 332: 328: 324: 317: 309: 307:9781138780194 303: 299: 292: 288: 279: 276: 275: 269: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 248: 244: 240: 234: 224: 215: 210: 206: 202: 200: 196: 189: 187: 186: 179: 169: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 123: 113: 110: 102: 99:November 2015 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: 63: 60: â€“  59: 55: 54:Find sources: 48: 44: 38: 37: 32:This article 30: 26: 21: 20: 1098:Preparedness 969: 930:Productivity 910:Mandeville's 702:Opposite Day 630:Burali-Forti 625:Bhartrhari's 439: 435: 426: 413: 404: 398: 389: 380: 372: 354: 348: 340: 322: 316: 297: 291: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 236: 212: 208: 204: 195:value in use 191: 183: 181: 152: 134: 130: 128: 105: 96: 86: 79: 72: 65: 53: 41:Please help 36:verification 33: 1028:Condorcet's 880:Giffen good 840:Competition 594:White horse 569:Omnipotence 386:Smith, Adam 233:Marginalism 218:Marginalism 1161:Categories 1103:Prevention 1093:Parrondo's 1083:Navigation 1068:Inventor's 1063:Hedgehog's 1023:Chainstore 1006:Population 1001:New states 935:Prosperity 915:Mayfield's 757:Entailment 737:Barbershop 650:Epimenides 284:References 162:John Locke 153:Euthydemus 147:Adam Smith 69:newspapers 1118:Willpower 1113:Tolerance 1088:Newcomb's 1053:Fredkin's 940:Scitovsky 860:Edgeworth 855:Easterlin 820:Antitrust 717:Russell's 712:Richard's 685:Pinocchio 640:Crocodile 559:Newcomb's 529:Goodman's 524:Free will 509:Epicurean 480:paradoxes 327:Routledge 227:diamonds. 1146:Category 1043:Ellsberg 895:Leontief 875:Gibson's 870:European 865:Ellsberg 835:Braess's 830:Bertrand 808:Economic 742:Catch-22 722:Socratic 564:Nihilism 534:Hedonism 494:Analysis 478:Notable 272:See also 166:John Law 151:Plato's 1048:Fenno's 1013:Arrow's 996:Alabama 986:Abilene 965:Tullock 920:Metzler 762:Lottery 752:Drinker 695:Yablo's 690:Quine's 645:Curry's 608:Logical 584:Sorites 574:Preface 554:Moore's 539:Liberal 514:Fiction 83:scholar 955:Thrift 925:Plenty 900:Lerner 890:Jevons 885:Icarus 815:Allais 777:Ross's 615:Barber 599:Zeno's 544:Meno's 365:  333:  304:  143:market 85:  78:  71:  64:  56:  1058:Green 1038:Downs 970:Value 905:Lucas 772:Raven 680:No-no 635:Court 620:Berry 139:water 90:JSTOR 76:books 1136:List 960:Toil 675:Card 670:Liar 363:ISBN 331:ISBN 302:ISBN 129:The 62:news 156:. 45:by 1163:: 438:. 371:. 357:. 339:. 325:. 164:, 160:, 790:" 786:" 471:e 464:t 457:v 407:. 392:. 310:. 112:) 106:( 101:) 97:( 87:· 80:· 73:· 66:· 39:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Paradox of value"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

water
market
Adam Smith
Plato's Euthydemus
Nicolaus Copernicus
John Locke
John Law
Labor theory of value
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
value in use
value in exchange

Marginalism
subjective theory of value
marginal utility
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
Paradox of hedonism
ISBN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑