1201:
1145:
1406:
1175:
1165:
1155:
44:
199:
1724:
321:, which was headed by the earls of Salisbury and Northumberland themselves. This was however, reformed two weeks later; Griffiths has speculated that this was probably because not only was it not big enough to deal with such a serious collapse in law and order, but also the commissioners themselves 'were not very effective.' Another weakness of this commission, he suggests, is the fact that it was composed with a number of Neville
1212:
1185:
493:
250:, to take the matter to the royal courts, resolving the legal case and thereby stating whose land this skirmish took place on. This view has been suggested after studying the Kings Bench lists (now withdrawn from the public), where a number of skirmishes such as this are recorded but the only injuries or casualties found are a hen and occasionally a dog.
428:; this, Griffiths suggests, presented Salisbury with an opportunity for revenge- which the earl took. Salisbury was now in an official position to write to Egremont and his father much more threateningly than the council had attempted the previous year. Northumberland was ordered to appear before the council by 12 June 1454, and his sons on 2 June.
369:. The crown continued to write to the involved parties. On 8 October 1453, the council wrote to the earl of Westmorland and congratulated him on not assisting the Middleham branch. It also wrote again to Salisbury and Northumberland, 'more in sorrow than in anger,' as Griffiths has phrased it, exhorting them to remember their positions of
505:
estates during the course of the feud. Griffiths has summarised the financial bonds that were intended to hold the peace together. Salisbury entered into a bond with the king for 12,000 marks on behalf of his sons Thomas and John (for being the principal
Neville players). Conversely, Northumberland and
467:
Stamford Bridge, one of the earl of
Salisbury's manors, was on the old Roman Road east of York. On 31 October 1454 (or, according to some accounts, 1 or 2 November) Egremont, and a short while later Richard Percy were captured by Sir Thomas Neville. Griffith's account describes there being hundreds
393:
The danger of civil war was intensified when both sides began summoning their retainers to strongholds in the north. On 20 October, the Percy clan had gathered 10,000 men at
Topcliffe. Only four miles away, the Neville force was stationed at Sheriff Hutton. After several threats from the king, both
373:
and also as members of the king's council. At the same time, Parlt demanded that the nobility resolve their problems peaceably rather than in force. However, the king's letters 'concluded wearily' that both of them kept raising armed forces in spite of the appeals from king and parliament. Similar
328:
By 27 July, says
Griffiths, the situation in the north had deteriorated so badly that the crown effectively abrogated its authority in the region, by writing directly to the two earls, laying responsibility for ending the dispute on them, and instructing them to keep their sons in order. It was at
114:
has also pointed out how
Northumberland seems to have been receiving less royal favour than Salisbury. He points out that when trouble came, it was to be the earls' sons, not the lords, that would start it. The degree to which the two earls were assisting and encouraging the feud behind the scenes
245:
Still, the Percy force was almost certainly larger in size (though 710 names have been preserved, they probably numbered over a thousand). Mutual fear of fighting a pitched battle meant there was little if any bloodshed, and the
Nevilles were able to retreat swiftly to their stronghold in Sheriff
86:
was the most important, the capital city of the north, it 'provided a focus for their rivalries'. It is not, he said, a coincidence that 'the two virtual battles between Percy and
Neville in 1453 and 1454 were fought close to the city's walls'. He also suggests that Percy tenants may have been as
504:
before a commission of Oyer and
Terminer at York. This commission bound them over for massive sums; 8,000 marks payable to Salisbury, and including fines towards his countess and sons, to a total of 16,800 marks; Griffiths describes this as Salisbury's 'reckoning' of all the damage caused to his
509:
bound themselves for the same amount, 'for all offences' against York and the
Nevilles. Salisbury also agreed that Lord Egremont was to be released from the 16,800 mark bond he had been punished with in November 1454, and would also desist from taking any action against the Newgate sheriffs
242:. He no doubt intended to assassinate the Nevilles, but all of the family were there with their own retinues, so they probably had a larger force than Egremont expected (as earls, Salisbury and Warwick were entitled to at least a hundred soldiers each in their retinues).
246:
Hutton. There is an alternative view; the evidence for this is found on legal rolls and nowhere else. As not a soul is recorded as being injured in the skirmish, it is possible that the
Nevilles used this incitement of violence as an excuse, an early example of a
436:
During York's Protectorate, Somerset was imprisoned, and the Percys suffered greatly at the hands of the Nevilles. When the king recovered from his illness, York was relieved of power, and Somerset was released and was quick to ally himself with the Percys.
374:
letters were sent to their involved younger sons using stronger terms, warning them that they could eventually suffer forfeiture. Griffiths has suggested that the crown was constrained in its attempts to suppress the law breaking because by now, the king
206:
This, the first actual confrontation (and 'most serious incident to date') between the two families, in response to the marriage of Thomas Neville and Maud, a marriage which Griffiths has said must have been 'obnoxious' to the Percys, and particularly
420:) and that this association was significant enough to be 'a coalition of national significance.' Griffiths notes that the parliament of 1453 failed to achieve any accord in the north, and that following the mental collapse of the king, York was made
94:
Griffiths has suggested that by the mid-fifteenth century, relations between Percy and Neville were 'poisoned by jealousy and resentment'. He has pointed out that Salisbury probably did not expect- and not receive- the assistance of the
1718:
Briefly joined the Lancastrians. Briefly joined the Yorkists. Defected from the Yorkist to the Lancastrian cause. Initially a Yorkist who later supported the Tudor claim. Initially a Lancastrian who later supported the Tudor claim.
131:, was seized by the Percys following the joining of the Cromwell and Neville families in marriage in 1453 (see below), and that Cromwell viewed the Nevilles as allies against the Percys. Likewise, Warwick's feud with Somerset in south
353:, 'and Yorkshire generally,' as opposed to the narrow remit of just York and environs as had the first one. Griffiths points to the fact that it actually found against at least four of John Neville's 'principle accomplices'-
514:
for 4,000 marks. This would have to be paid to Salisbury if he broke the peace towards the earl and his family for the next ten years. As Griffiths put, with these bonds, it was intended that 'the slate was wiped clean.'
35:. The original reason for the long dispute is unknown, and the first outbreaks of violence were in the 1450s, prior to the Wars of the Roses. The antagonists would later meet in battle several times during the feud.
612:(London, 1966), 134: Northumberland 'had been appointed Constable of England on 25 May 1450, but he had been replaced by Somerset four months later. He had not the Nevilles success in tapping the king's bounty.'
223:, it is impossible to assess the strength of their force—Griffiths suggests 'their retinue must have been impressive.' It has been suggested that the earl of Salisbury was personally targeted for attack by one
296:
6 May 1454: Salisbury's house in York was broken into and his tenants attacked. Those who took part in this attack had mostly been with Egremont at Heworth. These men were also responsible for the sacking of
135:
may have driven him into an alliance with the Duke of York against him. Griffiths also suggests that the single most important event to precipitate the feud was the marriage of Salisbury's second son,
238:
The prospect of Percy manors passing to the Neville family was too much for Lord Egremont, who spent days fiercely recruiting in York and ambushed the Nevilles on their way home to
143:. Not only, says Griffiths, was any further aggrandisement for Salisbury's family anathema to the Percys, but the new Cromwell connection gave the Nevilles access to the ex-Percy
325:; thus displaying a clear partisanship which would have been obvious to the Percys, and further reduce their faith in the crown's ability—or desire—to achieve a fair settlement.
358:
211:. This clash, on 24 August 1453, has been described as having the intention of 'the destruction of the entire Neville party' on the latter's way to the Neville stronghold of
341:, Peter Arden, John Portyngton, and Robert Danby, the latter three being lawyers and the former an uninvolved knight. The commission also expanded geographically into
329:
this point too, that the commission of Oyer and Terminer of 12 July was reissued; this time, without the presence of the earls, and with a much larger number of
412:
has described the roots of the Neville's alliance with Richard, Duke of York in 1453 as being based on their having 'common enemies' (for instance, the king's
224:
394:
sides reached a truce and disbanded their men. However, one chronicler said, "There was no reconciliation, the day of reckoning had merely been postponed."
362:
366:
1429:
140:
267:
401:
on 31 October or 1 November 1454, resulting in hundreds dead and more wounded. Lord Egremont was then captured and imprisoned by John Neville.
163:
two years later, further reducing the likelihood of the Percys reclaiming it. Griffiths has calculated Burwell to have been worth an income of
468:
killed and many wounded. It is likely that the Neville victory was made possible by the (to the Percys) treasonous flight of Peter Lound, the
1080:
506:
378:, and the council ruling in his stead were ill-able to afford alienating fellow magnates whose support might be required in government.
375:
1325:
398:
103:
first wife, Margaret Stafford), which he puts down to the previous feud between the two branches of the family, over the division of
123:
Various immediate causes having been ascribed to causing the outbreak of violence in 1454. Professor Griffiths has suggested that
1310:
1305:
1053:
287:
216:
179:
1454:
1424:
1320:
1230:
1115:
104:
100:
71:
1345:
1295:
1290:
1235:
417:
263:
124:
87:
anti-Neville as their lords, since their estates were contiguous, this could have encouraged rivalry and bred antagonism. As
219:
was party to Egremont's plans. Since only five members of the wedding party are ever named as being present by contemporary
1484:
1479:
1434:
1250:
1245:
390:'s house at Catton, in Yorkshire, and all but ruined it. The next day, Richard Percy attacked a house on Neville property.
91:
has pointed out, Neville retained some of his knights from 'deep in Percy country, particularly southern Northumberland'.
1539:
1444:
1360:
1350:
712:
Payling, S. J., 'The Ampthill Dispute: A Study in Aristocratic Lawlessness and the Breakdown of Lancastrian Government'
1370:
1275:
1037:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
1024:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
1011:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
985:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
972:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
933:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
920:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
907:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
894:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
881:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
868:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
855:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
842:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
829:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
816:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
803:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
790:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
777:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
764:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
751:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
738:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
725:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
699:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
686:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
673:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
647:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
634:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
595:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
582:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
556:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
543:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
530:
Griffiths, R.A., 'Local Rivalries and National Politics: the Percies, the Nevilles and the Duke of Exeter, 1452–55' in
1494:
1449:
1335:
1330:
1280:
1270:
1439:
1419:
1260:
283:
208:
1705:
1265:
1073:
496:
The medieval prison of Newgate, where the Percy brothers were imprisoned and whence they escaped two years later.
190:, and Cromwell's holding them in fee-simple meant they were available to him to grant away to whomever he liked.
115:
has also been questioned. Griffiths has said that Thomas and John were Salisbury's direct representatives in it.
1665:
1365:
293:
Griffiths has suggested that the conflict intensified after Christmas 1453, compared to the first few months.
282:. Significantly, they were, for the first time, accompanied by their fathers and elder brothers—Salisbury and
1639:
1559:
1464:
1390:
1255:
1544:
1469:
1680:
1599:
1340:
1285:
1240:
476:
manor, which was approximately two miles south of Stamford Bridge. The two Percy brothers were taken to
1768:
1763:
1727:
1564:
1459:
1300:
1066:
271:
259:
136:
286:
accompanied John and Thomas, whilst the Percy brothers were with Northumberland and his elder brother
23:
was a series of skirmishes, raids, and vandalism between two prominent northern English families, the
1629:
1534:
1514:
1315:
461:
449:
409:
151:, two-thirds of which had each been granted to Cromwell for life in February 1438, together with the
67:
1690:
1634:
1604:
1132:
187:
75:
1748:
1584:
1474:
660:
Griffiths, R.A., 'The King's Council and the First Protectorate of the Duke of York, 1453-1454,'
370:
1624:
1609:
1529:
1380:
1170:
387:
1753:
1644:
1569:
1524:
1200:
1144:
1100:
212:
82:
suggests meant that any tension would be solely between Percy and Neville. Since the city of
1675:
1619:
1180:
290:. However, the result of this near-confrontation appears to be unrecorded, says Griffiths.
183:
55:
8:
1554:
1225:
1140:
322:
1405:
1195:
1174:
1164:
1154:
1105:
441:
107:
79:
50:
in 2009: Forfeited by the Percys, it is possible they feared its loss to the Nevilles.
1594:
1579:
1549:
1220:
1089:
421:
318:
59:
32:
1614:
1589:
1574:
1489:
477:
354:
338:
334:
314:
28:
1355:
156:
152:
1758:
1700:
1695:
1670:
1519:
1206:
413:
342:
239:
148:
47:
24:
569:
Pollard, A.J., 'The Northern Retainers of Richard Nevill, Earl of Salisbury',
1742:
1660:
1400:
481:
310:
247:
78:
and the Duke of York do not seem to have visited Yorkshire very often, which
397:
Despite these precautions, it is probable that a few hundred men clashed at
1414:
1375:
279:
111:
88:
63:
43:
473:
350:
275:
228:
220:
144:
96:
452:, where the Duke of Somerset and the Earl of Northumberland were slain.
198:
1385:
1211:
1184:
1110:
511:
510:
responsible for Egremont's escape. Egremont himself was then obligated
425:
346:
160:
1150:
501:
132:
1058:
1160:
500:
Following their defeat at Stamford Bridge, the Percy brothers were
445:
298:
1039:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
1026:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
1013:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
987:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
974:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
935:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
922:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
909:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
896:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
883:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
870:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
857:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
844:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
831:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
818:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
805:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
792:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
779:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
766:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
753:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
740:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
727:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
701:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
688:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
675:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
649:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
636:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
597:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
584:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
558:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
545:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
532:
King and Country : England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century
469:
330:
128:
333:, 328 members included. The reissued commission was composed of
492:
83:
270:
for the latter—converged respectively on their castles of
258:
20 Oct 1453: The leaders of both Neville and Percy forces—
440:
Six months later, Henry VI, Somerset and the Percys (the
431:
202:
The earl of Salisbury's castle at Sheriff Hutton today
215:; it is, says Griffiths 'unclear' as to whether the
178:
in 1456. These manors had been forfeited in 1403 by
386:In retaliation, Sir John Neville raided the absent
961:English Political Culture in the Fifteenth Century
948:English Political Culture in the Fifteenth Century
1740:
455:
235:('against the earl of Salisbury in the field').
118:
31:, and their followers, that helped provoke the
231:, his name was individually recorded as being
1074:
487:
444:) met the Duke of York and the Nevilles (the
159:. This grant was then converted into one in
480:and then transferred to the duke of York's
253:
193:
16:15th-century skirmishes in northern England
1081:
1067:
491:
197:
42:
1311:Henry Percy, 3rd Earl of Northumberland
1306:Henry Percy, 2nd Earl of Northumberland
1741:
1231:Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales
404:
72:Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury
38:
1326:Humphrey Stafford, Duke of Buckingham
1301:Thomas Neville, Bastard of Fauconberg
1241:Edmund Beaufort, 4th Duke of Somerset
1236:Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset
1226:Elizabeth Woodville, Queen of England
1088:
1062:
418:Edmund Beaufort, 1st Duke of Somerset
304:
1480:George Plantagenet, Duke of Clarence
227:, due to the fact that at the later
1475:Edmund Plantagenet, Earl of Rutland
1361:Thomas Clifford, 8th Baron Clifford
1221:Margaret of Anjou, Queen of England
432:The rebellion of the Duke of Exeter
58:were divided between the crown (as
13:
1455:Richard Neville, Earl of Salisbury
1425:Thomas FitzGerald, Earl of Desmond
1321:Henry Stafford, Duke of Buckingham
14:
1780:
1430:William Herbert, Earl of Pembroke
1346:George Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury
1291:John Neville, Marquess of Montagu
1047:
1000:The End of the House of Lancaster
623:The End of the House of Lancaster
610:The End of the House of Lancaster
1723:
1722:
1485:Humphrey Stafford, Earl of Devon
1435:William Hastings, Baron Hastings
1420:John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln
1404:
1296:Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick
1251:Henry Beaufort, Duke of Somerset
1246:John Beaumont, Viscount Beaumont
1210:
1199:
1183:
1173:
1163:
1153:
1143:
209:Thomas Percy, 1st Baron Egremont
180:the first earl of Northumberland
1706:Second Cornish uprising of 1497
1445:Francis Lovell, Viscount Lovell
1351:John Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury
1031:
1018:
1005:
992:
979:
966:
953:
940:
927:
914:
901:
888:
875:
862:
849:
836:
823:
810:
797:
784:
771:
758:
745:
732:
719:
706:
693:
680:
667:
654:
641:
381:
139:to Maud Stanhope, the widow of
1666:Issue of Edward III of England
1415:Anne Neville, Queen of England
1376:Jasper Tudor, Earl of Pembroke
1371:Edmund Tudor, Earl of Richmond
628:
615:
602:
589:
576:
563:
550:
537:
524:
309:On 12 July 1453, the king and
1:
1640:Stafford and Lovell rebellion
1465:William Neville, Earl of Kent
1450:John Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk
1391:Edward Woodville, Lord Scales
1336:George Stanley, Baron Strange
1331:Thomas Stanley, Earl of Derby
1281:Henry Holland, Duke of Exeter
1276:John Courtenay, Earl of Devon
1271:John Clifford, Baron Clifford
1256:John Sutton, 1st Baron Dudley
518:
456:The battle of Stamford Bridge
266:for the former, Egremont and
119:Immediate causes for the feud
99:branch of his family (by his
1540:Siege of the Tower of London
1440:John Howard, Duke of Norfolk
1261:James Butler, Earl of Ormond
301:'s York house a week later.
233:contra comite Sarum in campo
7:
1600:1470 Lincolnshire Rebellion
1286:John Neville, Baron Neville
1266:John Butler, Earl of Ormond
10:
1785:
1366:James Tuchet, Baron Audley
1054:The Battle of Heworth Moor
488:Aftermath and consequences
459:
371:Commissioners of the Peace
1716:
1653:
1507:
1399:
1194:
1131:
1124:
1096:
781:, (London 1991), 322 n.57
714:English Historical Review
703:, (London 1991), 326 n.24
662:English Historical Review
462:Battle of Stamford Bridge
450:First Battle of St Albans
182:after the failure of the
68:Richard, 3rd Duke of York
460:Not to be confused with
376:had become incapacitated
284:Richard, Earl of Warwick
254:Incidents and chronology
194:Skirmish at Heworth Moor
1681:Bonville–Courtenay feud
141:Robert, Lord Willoughby
1630:Buckingham's rebellion
1610:Readeption of Henry VI
794:, (London 1991), 336-7
497:
388:Earl of Northumberland
217:Earl of Northumberland
203:
51:
1316:Thomas Ros, Baron Ros
1101:Red Rose of Lancaster
1002:(London, 1966), 148-9
495:
213:Sheriff Hutton Castle
201:
46:
1691:Neville–Neville feud
1676:Princes in the Tower
1041:, (London 1991), 360
1028:, (London 1991), 360
1015:, (London 1991), 354
989:, (London 1991), 342
976:, (London 1991), 342
937:, (London 1991), 336
924:, (London 1991), 336
911:, (London 1991), 335
898:, (London 1991), 327
885:, (London 1991), 328
859:, (London 1991), 327
846:, (London 1991), 327
833:, (London 1991), 327
820:, (London 1991), 343
807:, (London 1991), 324
768:, (London 1991), 330
755:, (London 1991), 329
742:, (London 1991), 325
729:, (London 1991), 334
690:, (London 1991), 325
677:, (London 1991), 322
651:, (London 1991), 358
638:, (London 1991), 325
599:, (London 1991), 323
586:, (London 1991), 322
560:, (London 1991), 331
547:, (London 1991), 322
534:, (London 1991), 321
288:Henry, Lord Poynings
1470:Sir Richard Herbert
963:(London, 2002), 206
950:(London, 2002), 105
625:(London, 1966), 134
405:York's protectorate
359:Sir James Pickering
225:Sir William Buckton
39:Origins and context
1686:Percy–Neville feud
1565:St Albans (Second)
1460:Sir Thomas Neville
1106:White Rose of York
498:
305:Crown intervention
204:
129:Wressle, Yorkshire
54:Yorkshire's three
52:
21:Percy–Neville feud
1769:Conflicts in 1454
1764:Wars of the Roses
1736:
1735:
1515:St Albans (First)
1503:
1502:
1381:Margaret Beaufort
1090:Wars of the Roses
716:, 104 (1989), 895
319:Oyer and Terminer
268:Sir Richard Percy
89:Professor Pollard
60:Duke of Lancaster
33:Wars of the Roses
1776:
1726:
1725:
1560:Mortimer's Cross
1490:Margaret of York
1408:
1214:
1203:
1187:
1177:
1167:
1157:
1147:
1129:
1128:
1083:
1076:
1069:
1060:
1059:
1042:
1035:
1029:
1022:
1016:
1009:
1003:
996:
990:
983:
977:
970:
964:
957:
951:
944:
938:
931:
925:
918:
912:
905:
899:
892:
886:
879:
873:
866:
860:
853:
847:
840:
834:
827:
821:
814:
808:
801:
795:
788:
782:
775:
769:
762:
756:
749:
743:
736:
730:
723:
717:
710:
704:
697:
691:
684:
678:
671:
665:
658:
652:
645:
639:
632:
626:
619:
613:
606:
600:
593:
587:
580:
574:
571:Northern History
567:
561:
554:
548:
541:
535:
528:
478:Middleham Castle
367:Thomas Mountford
355:Sir John Conyers
339:Northamptonshire
335:Sir William Lucy
29:House of Neville
1784:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1732:
1712:
1649:
1625:Siege of London
1499:
1495:Richard of York
1403:
1395:
1356:Andrew Trollope
1341:William Stanley
1209:
1205:
1204:
1198:
1190:
1120:
1092:
1087:
1050:
1045:
1036:
1032:
1023:
1019:
1010:
1006:
997:
993:
984:
980:
971:
967:
958:
954:
945:
941:
932:
928:
919:
915:
906:
902:
893:
889:
880:
876:
872:, (London 1991)
867:
863:
854:
850:
841:
837:
828:
824:
815:
811:
802:
798:
789:
785:
776:
772:
763:
759:
750:
746:
737:
733:
724:
720:
711:
707:
698:
694:
685:
681:
672:
668:
664:, 99 (1984), 73
659:
655:
646:
642:
633:
629:
620:
616:
607:
603:
594:
590:
581:
577:
573:, 11 (1976), 61
568:
564:
555:
551:
542:
538:
529:
525:
521:
490:
465:
458:
434:
407:
399:Stamford Bridge
384:
307:
256:
196:
184:Percy Rebellion
147:of Wressle and
125:Lord Cromwell's
121:
80:Ralph Griffiths
41:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1782:
1772:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1749:Neville family
1734:
1733:
1731:
1730:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1703:
1701:Battle of Deal
1696:Perkin Warbeck
1693:
1688:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1671:Titulus Regius
1668:
1663:
1657:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1635:Bosworth Field
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1605:Losecoat Field
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1530:Ludford Bridge
1527:
1522:
1520:Loveday (1458)
1517:
1511:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1452:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1432:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1411:
1409:
1397:
1396:
1394:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1217:
1215:
1192:
1191:
1189:
1188:
1178:
1168:
1158:
1148:
1137:
1135:
1126:
1122:
1121:
1119:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1086:
1085:
1078:
1071:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1049:
1048:External links
1046:
1044:
1043:
1030:
1017:
1004:
998:Storey, R.L.,
991:
978:
965:
952:
939:
926:
913:
900:
887:
874:
861:
848:
835:
822:
809:
796:
783:
770:
757:
744:
731:
718:
705:
692:
679:
666:
653:
640:
627:
621:Storey, R.L.,
614:
608:Storey, R.L.,
601:
588:
575:
562:
549:
536:
522:
520:
517:
489:
486:
457:
454:
433:
430:
424:and Salisbury
414:chief minister
406:
403:
383:
380:
343:Northumberland
306:
303:
255:
252:
240:Sheriff Hutton
195:
192:
137:Thomas Neville
120:
117:
48:Wressle Castle
40:
37:
25:House of Percy
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1781:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1744:
1729:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1684:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1661:Act of Accord
1659:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1585:Hedgeley Moor
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1510:
1506:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1441:
1438:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1202:
1197:
1193:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1079:
1077:
1072:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1040:
1034:
1027:
1021:
1014:
1008:
1001:
995:
988:
982:
975:
969:
962:
959:Hicks, M.A.,
956:
949:
946:Hicks, M.A.,
943:
936:
930:
923:
917:
910:
904:
897:
891:
884:
878:
871:
865:
858:
852:
845:
839:
832:
826:
819:
813:
806:
800:
793:
787:
780:
774:
767:
761:
754:
748:
741:
735:
728:
722:
715:
709:
702:
696:
689:
683:
676:
670:
663:
657:
650:
644:
637:
631:
624:
618:
611:
605:
598:
592:
585:
579:
572:
566:
559:
553:
546:
540:
533:
527:
523:
516:
513:
508:
503:
494:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
463:
453:
451:
447:
443:
438:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:Michael Hicks
402:
400:
395:
391:
389:
379:
377:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
302:
300:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
251:
249:
248:legal fiction
243:
241:
236:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
116:
113:
109:
106:
105:Westmorland's
102:
98:
92:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
49:
45:
36:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1754:Percy family
1685:
1038:
1033:
1025:
1020:
1012:
1007:
999:
994:
986:
981:
973:
968:
960:
955:
947:
942:
934:
929:
921:
916:
908:
903:
895:
890:
882:
877:
869:
864:
856:
851:
843:
838:
830:
825:
817:
812:
804:
799:
791:
786:
778:
773:
765:
760:
752:
747:
739:
734:
726:
721:
713:
708:
700:
695:
687:
682:
674:
669:
661:
656:
648:
643:
635:
630:
622:
617:
609:
604:
596:
591:
583:
578:
570:
565:
557:
552:
544:
539:
531:
526:
499:
466:
442:Lancastrians
439:
435:
408:
396:
392:
385:
382:Open warfare
327:
313:announced a
308:
295:
292:
280:North Riding
264:John Neville
257:
244:
237:
232:
205:
175:
172:
168:
164:
122:
112:Robin Storey
93:
64:Percy family
53:
20:
18:
1645:Stoke Field
1570:Ferrybridge
1545:Northampton
1525:Blore Heath
1171:Richard III
1125:Key figures
1116:Family tree
474:Pocklington
351:Westmorland
276:Sand Hutton
229:indictments
221:chroniclers
1743:Categories
1620:Tewkesbury
1386:Owen Tudor
1111:Tudor rose
519:References
507:his mother
426:Chancellor
365:, and Sir
347:Cumberland
315:commission
161:fee simple
1555:Wakefield
1196:Lancaster
1181:Henry VII
1151:Edward IV
502:arraigned
472:of their
448:) in the
422:protector
323:retainers
272:Topcliffe
176:per annum
157:remainder
153:reversion
133:Glamorgan
127:manor of
1728:Category
1654:See also
1535:Sandwich
1161:Edward V
1141:Henry VI
1133:Monarchs
446:Yorkists
363:Randolph
299:Skipwith
188:Henry IV
186:against
167:. £38 10
101:father's
76:the King
27:and the
1595:Edgcote
1580:Piltown
1550:Worksop
512:in bond
482:custody
470:bailiff
331:lawyers
311:council
278:in the
155:of the
149:Burwell
62:), the
56:ridings
1615:Barnet
1590:Hexham
1575:Towton
1508:Events
361:, Sir
260:Thomas
145:manors
70:, and
1759:Feuds
1207:Tudor
1401:York
274:and
262:and
108:will
97:Raby
84:York
19:The
337:of
317:of
1745::
484:.
416:,
357:,
349:,
345:,
110:.
74:.
66:,
1082:e
1075:t
1068:v
464:.
173:d
171:6
169:s
165:c
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.