133:
366:
24:
403:, Batson, the black defendant of the case, called out racially-based discrimination in the courtroom. The court agreed with him, and concluded that racially motivated peremptory challenges were unconstitutional; however, the Batson court argued that: "a criminal defendant may object to race-based... peremptory challenges whether or not the defendant and excluded juror share the same race." The
388:, where the court concluded: " state's purposeful or deliberate denial to Negroes on account of race of participation as jurors in the administration of justice violates the Equal Protection Clause." Ultimately, the state has a right to practice peremptory challenges in the jury selection process; however, this right is only protected "as long as that reason is related to the outcome" (
445:
was an important case that helped continue to remove discrimination within the courtroom. However, it is important to note that it did not entirely dismantle discrimination in jury selection. Questions about the constitutionality of race-based peremptory challenges by defendants were not addressed in
407:
decision re-examined this provision and established that defendants have the right to call out and question racial discrimination in the courtroom regardless of a difference in race. In other words, a white defendant could question the exclusion of a black juror and vice versa as it was a defendant's
336:
to help prove him innocent; however, during the jury selection process, seven Black venirepersons were cut out from the final jury selection. Powers objected and requested an explanation as to why these venirepersons were excluded. The Court dismissed his objection, and in the trial Powers was found
425:
411:
In the final decision, the Court ruled in favor of Powers's question in a 7โ2 decision; but, it did not overrule Powers's personal case. The Court's majority opinion explained, "if for any reason the State is unable to reconvict Powers for the double murder at issue here, later victims may pay the
340:
Following his conviction, Powers went to the Ohio Court of
Appeals under the belief that his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were infringed upon. According to Powers, he was not given a fair, impartial jury because of racially justified preemptory challenges. This move was ultimately another
378:
delivered the following statement in regards to this: "Invoking the Equal
Protection Clause and federal statutory law, and relying upon well-established principles of standing, we hold that a criminal defendant may object to race-based exclusions of jurors effected through peremptory challenges
344:
Powers argued his status as a white man was irrelevant to case at hand. He explained that he had the right to question "the prosecution's discriminatory use of peremptories." The Court of
Appeals approved his appeal, but the Ohio Supreme Court denied his case. Powers, distraught, took it to the
315:
on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sex. Powers expanded the jurisdictions of this principle, allowing all parties within a case, defendants especially, to question preemptory challenges during a jury selection, regardless of race. This holding was protected under the
379:
whether or not the defendant and the excluded jurors share the same race." Additionally, the
Supreme Court concluded that "discriminatory use of peremptories harms the excluded jurors by depriving them of a significant opportunity to participate in civil life."
356:
did not prevent jury selectors from excluding potential jurors on the basis of race. With this new conclusion, Powers had to restructure his case around the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
373:
The Court came to multiple conclusions with this case. For starters, it did establish, once again, that racial bias and discrimination in juries and jury selection processes were unconstitutional. Justice
332:
Larry Joe Powers, a white defendant, was prosecuted on two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in
Franklin County, Ohio. Under the Sixth Amendment, Powers requested a
885:
519:
412:
price for our extravagance...crime would go unpunished and criminals go free." While racial discrimination was unconstitutional, it did not take away from Power's crimes. Thus
321:
779:
751:
184:
432:, important voice in the dissent of the case. Along with Marshall, Stevens, Blackmun, White, and O'Connor, Rehnquist was part of the Court that decided
353:
416:
re-examined the Batson
Challenge and expanded its jurisdictions, but it did not directly address or overturn Powers's status as guilty.
880:
619:
589:
890:
88:
60:
541:
137:
67:
107:
41:
74:
45:
628:: The Discriminatory Effect of the Peremptory Challenge Evaluated from the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments"
165:
56:
302:
817:
715:"Milking the New Sacred Cow: The Supreme Court Limits the Peremptory Challenge on Racial Grounds in
408:
right to question the integrity of their impartial trial without race standing in the way of that.
317:
34:
235:
799:
783:
755:
727:
176:
808:
81:
651:"Another Step Towards Ending Discrimination in the Jury Selection Process - Powers v. Ohio"
365:
312:
714:
8:
790:
746:
650:
448:
826:
700:
694:
677:
434:
307:
835:
758:
429:
231:
219:
203:
493:
384:
853:
179:
375:
247:
311:, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Batson Challenge prohibits jury selectors from using
243:
223:
874:
446:
this case. The following year, such challenges were held unconstitutional in
341:
infringement upon the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
255:
862:
479:
564:
211:
844:
559:
369:
Justice
Anthony M. Kennedy, leading majority opinion for Powers v. Ohio.
333:
272:
Kennedy, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter
661:(3): 369โ383 – via Campbell University Institutional Repository.
337:
guilty of all charges. The court sentenced him to 53 years in prison.
424:
23:
382:
As the justices came to this conclusion, they drew heavily from
132:
604:(Criminal Procedure Edition): 219โ236 – via HeinOnline.
348:
As Powers's case was reviewed, the
Supreme Court dealt with
305:
case that re-examined the Batson Challenge. Established by
886:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
345:
Supreme Court instead, where they agreed to review it.
735:(2): 691โ731 – via Pepperdine Digital Commons.
48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
872:
469:
467:
465:
530:(4): 895โ939 – via Gale Academic Onefile.
462:
617:
520:"Juries and Race in the Nineteenth Century"
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
648:
423:
392:). Powers v. Ohio helped reaffirm this.
364:
712:
557:
873:
587:
517:
688:
686:
419:
120:1991 United States Supreme Court case
649:Hornthal, L. Phillip (Summer 1992).
638:(2): 335โ356 – via HeinOnline.
613:
611:
583:
581:
579:
553:
551:
395:The case also addressed a provision
46:adding citations to reliable sources
17:
594:: Race-Based Peremptory Challenges"
13:
721:Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.
683:
138:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
902:
881:United States Supreme Court cases
786:400 (1991) is available from:
768:
608:
576:
572:(7): 38, 40โ42 – via JSTOR.
548:
491:
131:
22:
739:
706:
598:University of Kansas Law Review
588:Wilson, Christopher T. (1992).
558:Stewart, David O. (July 1991).
544:. National Constitution Center.
33:needs additional citations for
891:1991 in United States case law
665:
642:
534:
511:
485:
1:
494:"What is a Batson Challenge?"
455:
327:
301:, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), was a
7:
360:
352:. This case found that the
303:United States Supreme Court
280:Scalia, joined by Rehnquist
10:
907:
863:Oyez (oral argument audio)
618:Murray, Paul (1991โ1992).
518:Forman, James Jr. (2004).
390:United States v. Robinson
289:
284:
276:
268:
263:
197:
192:
171:
161:
151:
144:
130:
125:
632:Criminal Justice Journal
562:. Supreme Court Report.
560:"Whither Peremptories?"
318:Equal Protection Clause
290:U.S. Const. amends. XIV
713:Bradley, Kirk (1992).
439:
370:
145:Argued October 9, 1990
728:Pepperdine Law Review
427:
368:
313:peremptory challenges
147:Decided April 1, 1991
678:493 U.S. 474
480:499 U.S. 400
322:Fourteenth Amendment
42:improve this article
845:Library of Congress
747:Georgia v. McCollum
701:499 U.S. 79
673:Holland v. Illinois
655:Campbell Law Review
622:Holland v. Illinois
449:Georgia v. McCollum
350:Holland v. Illinois
236:Sandra Day O'Connor
695:Batson v. Kentucky
440:
435:Batson v. Kentucky
420:Later developments
401:Batson v. Kentucky
397:Batson v. Kentucky
371:
308:Batson v. Kentucky
208:Associate Justices
498:Appeals Law Group
430:William Rehnquist
294:
293:
220:Thurgood Marshall
204:William Rehnquist
118:
117:
110:
92:
898:
867:
861:
858:
852:
849:
843:
840:
834:
831:
825:
822:
816:
813:
807:
804:
798:
795:
789:
762:
743:
737:
736:
710:
704:
698:
690:
681:
675:
669:
663:
662:
646:
640:
639:
615:
606:
605:
585:
574:
573:
555:
546:
545:
542:"14th Amendment"
538:
532:
531:
524:Yale Law Journal
515:
509:
508:
506:
504:
489:
483:
477:
471:
385:Swain v. Alabama
193:Court membership
135:
134:
123:
122:
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
57:"Powers v. Ohio"
50:
26:
18:
906:
905:
901:
900:
899:
897:
896:
895:
871:
870:
865:
859:
856:
850:
847:
841:
838:
832:
829:
823:
820:
814:
811:
805:
802:
796:
793:
787:
771:
766:
765:
744:
740:
711:
707:
692:
691:
684:
671:
670:
666:
647:
643:
616:
609:
586:
577:
556:
549:
540:
539:
535:
516:
512:
502:
500:
490:
486:
473:
472:
463:
458:
422:
376:Anthony Kennedy
363:
354:Sixth Amendment
330:
248:Anthony Kennedy
246:
234:
232:John P. Stevens
222:
146:
140:
121:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
39:
27:
12:
11:
5:
904:
894:
893:
888:
883:
869:
868:
818:Google Scholar
776:Powers v. Ohio
770:
769:External links
767:
764:
763:
738:
717:Powers v. Ohio
705:
682:
664:
641:
626:Powers v. Ohio
607:
592:Powers v. Ohio
575:
547:
533:
510:
484:
475:Powers v. Ohio
460:
459:
457:
454:
443:Powers v. Ohio
428:Chief Justice
421:
418:
414:Powers v. Ohio
399:failed to. In
362:
359:
329:
326:
298:Powers v. Ohio
292:
291:
287:
286:
282:
281:
278:
274:
273:
270:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:
258:
244:Antonin Scalia
224:Harry Blackmun
209:
206:
201:
195:
194:
190:
189:
173:
169:
168:
163:
159:
158:
156:Powers v. Ohio
153:
152:Full case name
149:
148:
142:
141:
136:
128:
127:
126:Powers v. Ohio
119:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
903:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
878:
876:
864:
855:
846:
837:
828:
819:
810:
801:
800:CourtListener
792:
785:
781:
777:
773:
772:
760:
757:
753:
749:
748:
742:
734:
730:
729:
724:
722:
718:
709:
702:
697:
696:
689:
687:
679:
674:
668:
660:
656:
652:
645:
637:
633:
629:
627:
623:
614:
612:
603:
599:
595:
593:
584:
582:
580:
571:
567:
566:
561:
554:
552:
543:
537:
529:
525:
521:
514:
499:
495:
492:Shiga, Shun.
488:
481:
476:
470:
468:
466:
461:
453:
451:
450:
444:
437:
436:
431:
426:
417:
415:
409:
406:
402:
398:
393:
391:
387:
386:
380:
377:
367:
358:
355:
351:
346:
342:
338:
335:
325:
323:
319:
314:
310:
309:
304:
300:
299:
288:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:Case opinions
262:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:Chief Justice
199:
198:
196:
191:
187:
186:
181:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
160:
157:
154:
150:
143:
139:
129:
124:
112:
109:
101:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: โ
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
43:
37:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
775:
761: (1992).
745:
741:
732:
726:
720:
716:
708:
703: (1986).
693:
680: (1990).
672:
667:
658:
654:
644:
635:
631:
625:
621:
601:
597:
591:
569:
563:
536:
527:
523:
513:
501:. Retrieved
497:
487:
482: (1991).
474:
447:
442:
441:
433:
413:
410:
404:
400:
396:
394:
389:
383:
381:
372:
349:
347:
343:
339:
331:
306:
297:
296:
295:
285:Laws applied
256:David Souter
251:
239:
227:
215:
183:
155:
104:
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
40:Please help
35:verification
32:
15:
565:ABA Journal
212:Byron White
875:Categories
854:OpenJurist
456:References
334:jury trial
328:Background
162:Docket no.
98:March 2021
68:newspapers
172:Citations
774:Text of
503:April 4,
361:Decision
269:Majority
809:Findlaw
791:Cornell
320:of the
277:Dissent
166:89-5011
82:scholar
866:
860:
857:
851:
848:
842:
839:
836:Leagle
833:
830:
827:Justia
824:
821:
815:
812:
806:
803:
797:
794:
788:
750:,
699:,
676:,
478:,
405:Powers
254:
252:·
250:
242:
240:·
238:
230:
228:·
226:
218:
216:·
214:
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
782:
754:
89:JSTOR
75:books
784:U.S.
756:U.S.
719:and
624:and
505:2021
185:more
177:U.S.
175:499
61:news
780:499
752:505
528:113
180:400
44:by
877::
778:,
759:42
733:19
731:.
725:.
685:^
659:14
657:.
653:.
636:13
634:.
630:.
610:^
602:40
600:.
596:.
578:^
570:77
568:.
550:^
526:.
522:.
496:.
464:^
452:.
324:.
723:"
620:"
590:"
507:.
438:.
188:)
182:(
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:ยท
79:ยท
72:ยท
65:ยท
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.