Knowledge

Quasi-contract

Source 📝

130:
for a valid contract are met, there is a perfectly normal contract. The only distinction between a contract arising by express agreement between two people and a contract implied-in-fact is that the latter was recognized by a court drawing inferences from facts proved at trial. When the plaintiff
42:
and is still a concept used in some modern legal systems. Quasi contract laws have been deduced from the Latin statement "Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena iactura", which proclaims that no one should grow rich out of another person's loss. It was one of the central doctrines of Roman law.
204:, 11 January 2008: "This is an action in contract and quasi-contract for services ... After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for Rambo on its contract claim and denied recovery on the quasi-contract claim." 73:
there were a contract subsisting between the parties. The defendant's promise—their agreement to be bound by the "contract"—was implied by law. The law of quasi-contract was generally used to enforce
84:
came to include various sub-forms known as the common money counts. The most important of these for the later development of the law of quasi-contract included: (i) actions for
131:
sued on either sort of contract, he was suing in the law of contract in respect of a consensually assumed obligation and her remedy for the defendant's breach was damages.
197: 119:
A quasi-contract is distinct from a contract implied in fact and may be distinguished from an explicitly agreed contract.
170: 126:
A person's assent to be bound by an agreement can be expressed or implied. In the latter case, assuming the
298: 103:
Quasi-contractual actions were generally (but not exclusively) used to remedy what would now be called
74: 145:, he was not enforcing some consensually assumed obligation, but rather an obligation imposed by law. 155: 303: 201: 175: 85: 293: 141:
there were a contract. When the plaintiff sued on such a 'contract' by bringing an action of
61: 127: 8: 165: 107:. In most common law jurisdictions the law of quasi-contract has been superseded by the 160: 108: 104: 96: 88:
to the plaintiff's use; (ii) actions for money paid to the defendant's use; (iii)
252: 137:. In contrast, quasi-contract refers to situations in which a defendant is bound 90: 56: 287: 32: 65:. In essence, the plaintiff would recover a money sum from the defendant 55:
jurisdictions, the law of quasi-contract can be traced to the medieval
52: 38:
recognised by a court. The notion of a quasi-contract can be traced to
39: 35: 280:
by S. J. Stoljar; Sydney : Law Book Co. of Australasia, 1964
258:Mason & Carter's Restitution Law in Australia 285: 69:the defendant had promised to pay it: that is, 114: 253:Goff & Jones Law of Unjust Enrichment 262:The Principles of the Law of Restitution 239:An Introduction to English Legal History 16:Fictional contract recognised by a court 286: 226:An Introduction to English Law History 13: 271: 14: 315: 171:Restitution and unjust enrichment 250:See generally, Mitchell et al, 237:See generally, Sir John Baker, 224:See generally, Sir John Baker, 198:Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 260:(2nd ed, 2008); Graham Virgo, 256:(8th ed, 2011); Carter et al, 244: 231: 218: 190: 1: 211: 80:The form of action known as 7: 149: 115:Quasi-contract and contract 10: 320: 202:Rambo v. South Tama County 46: 278:The Law of Quasi-Contract 124:Contract implied in fact. 183: 156:Implied-in-fact contract 109:law of unjust enrichment 25:implied-in-law contract 176:Officious intermeddler 86:money had and received 143:indebitatus assumpsit 128:requisite formalities 82:indebitatus assumpsit 62:indebitatus assumpsit 29:constructive contract 166:Promissory estoppel 299:Law of obligations 161:Negotiorum gestio 105:unjust enrichment 311: 265: 248: 242: 235: 229: 222: 205: 196:See for example 194: 97:quantum valebant 319: 318: 314: 313: 312: 310: 309: 308: 284: 283: 274: 272:Further reading 269: 268: 249: 245: 236: 232: 223: 219: 214: 209: 208: 195: 191: 186: 152: 117: 49: 17: 12: 11: 5: 317: 307: 306: 304:Legal fictions 301: 296: 282: 281: 273: 270: 267: 266: 264:(3rd ed, 2015) 243: 230: 216: 215: 213: 210: 207: 206: 188: 187: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 168: 163: 158: 151: 148: 147: 146: 135:Quasi-contract 132: 116: 113: 91:quantum meruit 75:restitutionary 57:form of action 48: 45: 21:quasi-contract 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 316: 305: 302: 300: 297: 295: 292: 291: 289: 279: 276: 275: 263: 259: 255: 254: 247: 240: 234: 227: 221: 217: 203: 199: 193: 189: 177: 174: 173: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 153: 144: 140: 136: 133: 129: 125: 122: 121: 120: 112: 110: 106: 101: 99: 98: 93: 92: 87: 83: 78: 77:obligations. 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 58: 54: 44: 41: 37: 34: 30: 26: 22: 294:Contract law 277: 261: 257: 251: 246: 238: 233: 225: 220: 192: 142: 138: 134: 123: 118: 102: 95: 89: 81: 79: 70: 66: 60: 50: 28: 24: 20: 18: 94:; and (iv) 288:Categories 212:References 53:common law 59:known as 40:Roman law 33:fictional 241:(4th ed) 228:(4th ed) 150:See also 36:contract 47:History 31:) is a 184:Notes 139:as if 71:as if 67:as if 23:(or 51:In 27:or 290:: 200:, 111:. 100:. 19:A

Index

fictional
contract
Roman law
common law
form of action
indebitatus assumpsit
restitutionary
money had and received
quantum meruit
quantum valebant
unjust enrichment
law of unjust enrichment
requisite formalities
Implied-in-fact contract
Negotiorum gestio
Promissory estoppel
Restitution and unjust enrichment
Officious intermeddler
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Rambo v. South Tama County
Goff & Jones Law of Unjust Enrichment
Categories
Contract law
Law of obligations
Legal fictions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.