430:(1924). Trotsky does not wholly dismiss the Formalist approach, but insists that "the methods of formal analysis are necessary, but insufficient" because they neglect the social world with which the human beings who write and read literature are bound up: "The form of art is, to a certain and very large degree, independent, but the artist who creates this form, and the spectator who is enjoying it, are not empty machines, one for creating form and the other for appreciating it. They are living people, with a crystallized psychology representing a certain unity, even if not entirely harmonious. This psychology is the result of social conditions" (180, 171).
821:
412:
encourage readers to stop and look closer at scenes and happenings they otherwise might have skimmed through uncaring. The reader is not meant to be able to skim through literature. When addressed in a language of estrangement, speech cannot be skimmed through. "In the routines of everyday speech, our perceptions of and responses to reality become stale, blunted, and as the
Formalists would say 'automatized'. By forcing us into a dramatic awareness of language, literature refreshes these habitual responses and renders objects more perceptible" (Eagleton 3).
217:
great critic
Belinsky as an integral part of social and political history. On the other hand, literature was considered to be the personal expression of an author's world vision, expressed by means of images and symbols. In both cases, literature is not considered as such, but evaluated on a broad socio-political or a vague psychologico-impressionistic background. The aim of Shklovsky is therefore to isolate and define something specific to literature or "poetic language": these, as we saw, are the "devices" which make up the "artfulness" of literature.
465:
that it opened up new areas of inquiry, vastly enriched our knowledge of literary technology, raised the standards of our literary research and of our theorizing about literature effected, in a sense, a
Europeanization of our literary scholarship…. Poetics, once a sphere of unbridled impressionism, became an object of scientific analysis, a concrete problem of literary scholarship ("Formalism V Russkom Literaturovedenii", quoted in Erlich, "Russian Formalism: In Perspective" 225).
1031:
25:
286:
response to these extra-literary factors the self-regulating literary system is compelled to rejuvenate itself constantly. Even though the systemic
Formalists incorporated the social dimension into literary theory and acknowledged the analogy between language and literature the figures of author and reader were pushed to the margins of this paradigm.
298:. The adherents of this model placed poetic language at the center of their inquiry. As Warner remarks, "Jakobson makes it clear that he rejects completely any notion of emotion as the touchstone of literature. For Jakobson, the emotional qualities of a literary work are secondary to and dependent on purely verbal, linguistic facts" (71).
173:
approaches. As Erlich points out, "It was intent upon delimiting literary scholarship from contiguous disciplines such as psychology, sociology, intellectual history, and the list theoreticians focused on the 'distinguishing features' of literature, on the artistic devices peculiar to imaginative writing" (
469:
The diverging and converging forces of
Russian formalism gave rise to the Prague school of structuralism in the mid-1920s and provided a model for the literary wing of French structuralism in the 1960s and 1970s. "And, insofar as the literary-theoretical paradigms which Russian Formalism inaugurated
387:
Jakobson opposes the view that "an average reader" uninitiated into the science of language is presumably insensitive to verbal distinctions: "Speakers employ a complex system of grammatical relations inherent to their language even though they are not capable of fully abstracting and defining them"
252:
Disappointed by the constraints of the mechanistic method some
Russian Formalists adopted the organic model. "They utilized the similarity between organic bodies and literary phenomena in two different ways: as it applied to individual works and to literary genres" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 19).
371:
In "A Postscript to the
Discussion on Grammar of Poetry," Jakobson redefines poetics as "the linguistic scrutiny of the poetic function within the context of verbal messages in general, and within poetry in particular" (23). He fervently defends linguists' right to contribute to the study of poetry
198:
The OPOJAZ, the
Society for the Study of Poetic Language group, headed by Viktor Shklovsky was primarily concerned with the Formal method and focused on technique and device. "Literary works, according to this model, resemble machines: they are the result of an intentional human activity in which a
301:
As Ashima
Shrawan explains, "The theoreticians of OPOJAZ distinguished between practical and poetic language . . . . Practical language is used in day-to-day communication to convey information. . . . In poetic language, according to Lev Jakubinsky, 'the practical goal retreats into background and
477:
and
Russian Formalism, each having developed at around the same time (RF: 1910-20s and NC: 1940s-50s) but independently of the other. Despite this, there are several similarities: for example, both movements showed an interest in considering literature on its own terms, instead of focusing on its
464:
The contribution of our literary scholarship lies in the fact that it has focused sharply on the basic problems of literary criticism and literary study, first of all on the specificity of its object, that it modified our conception of the literary work and broke it down into its component parts,
401:
Roman Jakobson described literature as "organized violence committed on ordinary speech." Literature constitutes a deviation from average speech that intensifies, invigorates, and estranges the mundane speech patterns. In other words, for the Formalists, literature is set apart because it is just
285:
Since literature constitutes part of the overall cultural system, the literary dialectic participates in cultural evolution. As such, it interacts with other human activities, for instance, linguistic communication. The communicative domain enriches literature with new constructive principles. In
281:
The diachronic dimension was incorporated into the work of the systemic Formalists. The main proponent of the "systemo-functional" model was Yury Tynyanov. "In light of his concept of literary evolution as a struggle among competing elements, the method of parody, 'the dialectic play of devices,'
216:
Shklovsky's main objective in "Art as Device" is to dispute the conception of literature and literary criticism common in Russia at that time. Broadly speaking, literature was considered, on the one hand, to be a social or political product, whereby it was then interpreted in the tradition of the
184:
The formalists agreed on the autonomous nature of poetic language and its specificity as an object of study for literary criticism. Their main endeavor consisted in defining a set of properties specific to poetic language, be it poetry or prose, recognizable by their "artfulness" and consequently
272:
Having shifted the focus of study from an isolated technique to a hierarchically structured whole, the organic Formalists overcame the main shortcoming of the mechanists. Still, both groups failed to account for the literary changes which affect not only devices and their functions but genres as
264:
The analogy between biology and literary theory provided the frame of reference for genre studies and genre criticism. "Just as each individual organism shares certain features with other organisms of its type, and species that resemble each other belong to the same genus, the individual work is
411:
This estrangement serves literature by forcing the reader to think about what might have been an ordinary piece of writing about a common life experience in a more thoughtful way. A piece of writing in a novel versus a piece of writing in a fishing magazine. At the very least, literature should
243:
The mechanistic methodology reduced literature to a variation and combination of techniques and devices devoid of a temporal, psychological, or philosophical element. Shklovsky very soon realized that this model had to be expanded to embrace, for example, contemporaneous and diachronic literary
158:
coinage. It might have been convenient as a simplified battle cry but it fails, as an objective term, to delimit the activities of the 'Society for the Study of Poetic Language'." Russian Formalism is the name now given to a mode of criticism which emerged from two different groups, The Moscow
459:
Russian formalism was not a uniform movement; it comprised diverse theoreticians whose views were shaped through methodological debate that proceeded from the distinction between poetic and practical language to the overarching problem of the historical-literary study. It is mainly with this
256:
An artefact, like a biological organism, is not an unstructured whole; its parts are hierarchically integrated. Hence the definition of the device has been extended to its function in text. "Since the binary opposition – material vs. device – cannot account for the organic unity of the work,
172:
Russian formalism is distinctive for its emphasis on the functional role of literary devices and its original conception of literary history. Russian Formalists advocated a "scientific" method for studying poetic language, to the exclusion of traditional psychological and cultural-historical
180:
Two general principles underlie the Formalist study of literature: first, literature itself, or rather, those of its features that distinguish it from other human activities, must constitute the object of inquiry of literary theory; second, "literary facts" have to be prioritized over the
235:
The Formalist movement attempted to discriminate systematically between art and non-art. Therefore, its notions are organized in terms of polar oppositions. One of the most famous dichotomies introduced by the mechanistic Formalists is a distinction between story and plot, or fabula and
220:
Formalists do not agree with one another on exactly what a device or "priyom" is, nor how these devices are used or how they are to be analyzed in a given text. The central idea is that more general: poetic language possesses specific properties, which can be analyzed as such.
402:
that: set apart. The use of devices such as imagery, rhythm, and meter is what separates "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns (Nabokov
199:
specific skill transforms raw material into a complex mechanism suitable for a particular purpose" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 18). This approach strips the literary artifact from its connection with the author, reader, and historical background.
363:. As Mandelker indicates, "his methodological restraint and his conception of an artistic 'unity' wherein no element is superfluous or disengaged, … serves well as an ultimate model for the Formalist approach to versification study" (335).
240:". Story, fabula, is a chronological sequence of events, whereas plot, sjuzhet, can unfold in non-chronological order. The events can be artistically arranged by means of such devices as repetition, parallelism, gradation, and retardation.
163:
because of their similar emphasis on close reading, the Russian Formalists regarded themselves as developers of a science of criticism and are more interested in a discovery of systematic method for the analysis of poetic text.
129:
Russian formalism was a diverse movement, producing no unified doctrine, and no consensus amongst its proponents on a central aim to their endeavours. In fact, "Russian Formalism" describes two distinct movements: the
125:
as a whole. The movement's members had a relevant influence on modern literary criticism, as it developed in the structuralist and post-structuralist periods. Under Stalin it became a pejorative term for elitist art.
441:, the authorities further developed the term's pejorative associations to cover any art which used complex techniques and forms accessible only to the elite, rather than being simplified for "the people" (as in
313:
Eichenbaum criticised Shklovsky and Jakubinsky for not disengaging poetry from the outside world completely, since they used the emotional connotations of sound as a criterion for word choice. This recourse to
392:
and the grammatical problems of poetry is therefore justifiable; moreover, the linguistic conception of poetics reveals the ties between form and content indiscernible to the literary critic (Jakobson 34).
112:
who revolutionised literary criticism between 1914 and the 1930s by establishing the specificity and autonomy of poetic language and literature. Russian formalism exerted a major influence on thinkers like
149:
The term "formalism" was first used by the adversaries of the movement, and as such it conveys a meaning explicitly rejected by the Formalists themselves. In the words of one of the foremost Formalists,
767:
Knight, Chris. "Russian Formalist Roots', chapter 10 in Chris Knight, "Decoding Chomsky: Science and revolutionary politics", (paperback edition) London & New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
181:
metaphysical commitments of literary criticism, whether philosophical, aesthetic or psychological (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 16). To achieve these objectives several models were developed.
380:
or strophics, alliterations or rhymes, or to questions of poets' vocabulary" is hence undeniable (23). Linguistic devices that transform a verbal act into poetry range "from the network of
265:
similar to other works of its form and homologous literary forms belong to the same genre" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 19). The most widely known work carried out in this tradition is
224:
Some OPOJAZ members argued that poetic language was the major artistic device. Shklovsky insisted that not all artistic texts defamiliarize language, and that some of them achieve
651:
478:
relationship to political, cultural or historical externalities, a focus on the literary devices and the craft of the author, and a critical focus on poetry.
470:
are still with us, it stands not as a historical curiosity but a vital presence in the theoretical discourse of our day" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 29).
433:
The leaders of the movement began to be politically persecuted in the 1920s, when Stalin came to power, which largely put an end to their inquiries. In the
797:
146:. Therefore, it is more precise to refer to the "Russian Formalists", rather than to use the more encompassing and abstract term of "Formalism".
829:
Surdulescu, Radu. "Form, Structure and Structurality in Critical Theory." University of Bucharest Press, 2000 (online resource available:
302:
linguistic combinations acquire a value in themselves. When this happens, language becomes de-familiarized and utterances become poetic
261:
augmented it in 1919 with a third term, the teleological concept of style as the unity of devices" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 19).
656:
587:
Boris Eichenbaum, "Vokrug voprosa o formalistah" (Russian: "Вокруг Вопроса о Фоpмалистах", Around the question on the Formalists),
84:
in Russia from the 1910s to the 1930s. It includes the work of a number of highly influential Russian and Soviet scholars such as
925:
920:
1285:
355:
according to their contribution to the "sound background" (zvukovoj fon) attaching the greatest importance to stressed
990:
885:
670:
64:
741:
Goldblatt, David; Brown Lee B (eds.). "Aesthetics a Reader in Philosophy of the Arts" 2nd ed. Pearson Education Inc
704:
1280:
35:
1270:
609:
517:
729:. Ed. Alex Preminger and Terry V. F. Brogan. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. 1101-02.
1355:
1325:
910:
376:
to the most insightful investigation of a poetic message. The legitimacy of "studies devoted to questions of
1105:
830:
1185:
294:
The figures of author and reader were likewise downplayed by the linguistic Formalists Lev Jakubinsky and
1005:
950:
788:. Ed. Paul Schellinger et al. Vol. 1. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1998. 422-24. 2 vols.
345:
explores various types of sound repetitions, e.g. the ring (kol'co), the juncture (styk), the fastening (
1848:
1320:
965:
930:
213:, 1916): art is a sum of literary and artistic devices that the artist manipulates to craft his work.
1792:
995:
426:
159:
Linguistic Circle (1915) and the Opojaz group (1916). Although Russian Formalism is often linked to
820:
1235:
522:
143:
42:
541:
1290:
1195:
460:
theoretical focus that the Formalist School is credited even by its adversaries such as Yefimov:
449:
794:
The Language of Literature and Its Meaning: A Comparative Study of Indian and Western Aesthetics
1420:
1010:
955:
915:
497:
1460:
813:
1455:
1165:
1060:
878:
502:
1360:
1335:
1315:
1295:
1140:
637:
Any, Carol. "Boris Eikhenbaum in OPOIAZ: Testing the Limits of the Work-Centered Poetics."
381:
1390:
351:), and the tail-piece (koncovka) ("Zvukovye povtory" (Sound Repetitions); 1917). He ranks
321:
A definitive example of focus on poetic language is the study of Russian versification by
8:
1574:
1395:
1350:
1310:
1305:
1255:
940:
808:. Ed. Raman Selden. Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 11-29. 8 vols.
1762:
1737:
1594:
1584:
1540:
1380:
1275:
1265:
1095:
894:
690:
681:
570:
1817:
1654:
1629:
1525:
1210:
835:
Warner, Nicholas O. "In Search of Literary Science the Russian Formalist Tradition."
666:
487:
442:
352:
258:
225:
105:
1727:
1812:
1782:
1747:
1704:
1664:
1624:
1614:
1579:
1564:
1520:
1500:
1475:
1345:
1330:
1175:
1015:
871:
777:
Mandelker, Amy. "Russian Formalism and the Objective Analysis of Sound in Poetry."
688:---. "Roman Osipovich Jakobson 1896-1982: The Unity of his Thought on Verbal Art."
600:
562:
203:
151:
109:
97:
85:
318:
threatened the ultimate goal of formalism to investigate literature in isolation.
1787:
1742:
1669:
1649:
1639:
1515:
1470:
1435:
1430:
1375:
1365:
1240:
1125:
980:
975:
902:
624:
Trotsky, Leon (1924). Literature and Revolution. New York: Russell & Russell.
613:
114:
81:
1802:
41:
The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style of
1723:
1718:
1709:
1674:
1659:
1644:
1619:
1604:
1599:
1569:
1555:
1530:
1510:
1505:
1485:
1410:
1370:
1340:
1225:
1205:
1200:
1155:
1150:
1135:
1115:
935:
857:
699:
492:
377:
360:
295:
266:
139:
101:
93:
46:
1732:
1545:
1842:
1797:
1752:
1689:
1609:
1560:
1550:
1535:
1450:
1445:
1260:
1250:
1245:
1170:
1160:
1145:
1070:
970:
774:. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001. 1058-87.
647:
639:
512:
474:
438:
160:
122:
89:
1405:
202:
A clear illustration of this may be provided by the main argument of one of
1777:
1772:
1767:
1757:
1694:
1684:
1634:
1589:
1495:
1400:
1230:
1215:
1100:
1020:
985:
960:
945:
434:
421:
334:
330:
282:
become an important vehicle of change" (Steiner, "Russian Formalism" 21).
1827:
1713:
1699:
1679:
1480:
1465:
1440:
1425:
1415:
1180:
1030:
373:
154:: "It is difficult to recall who coined this name, but it was not a very
118:
850:
760:
Jakobson, Roman. "A Postscript to the Discussion on Grammar of Poetry."
734:
Garson, Judith. "Literary History: Russian Formalist Views, 1916-1928."
1300:
1220:
1190:
574:
315:
155:
1490:
1385:
1090:
1050:
863:
751:---. "Supplement to a Bibliography of Russian Formalism in English."
338:
322:
604:
566:
1807:
1075:
1065:
1822:
1130:
1110:
1080:
408:
9)", from "the assignment for next week is on page eighty four."
389:
237:
209:
1120:
1055:
744:
Gorman, David. "Bibliography of Russian Formalism in English."
507:
404:
356:
131:
1085:
1045:
326:
420:
One of the sharpest critiques of the Formalist project was
342:
388:(30). A systematic inquiry into the poetic problems of
784:
Rydel, Christine A. "Formalism (Russian Formalists)."
384:
to the arrangement of the entire text" (Jakobson 23).
772:
The Norton Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism
711:
Erlich, Victor. "Russian Formalism: In Perspective."
346:
727:
The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics
473:There is no direct historical relationship between
655:
16:Influential school of literary criticism in Russia
396:
1840:
679:Brown, Edward J. "The Formalist Contribution."
138:, Society for the Study of Poetic Language) in
325:. Apart from the most obvious devices such as
879:
232:) by manipulating composition and narrative.
594:
553:Erlich, Victor (1973). "Russian Formalism".
372:and demonstrates the aptitude of the modern
806:The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
713:The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
136:Obshchestvo Izucheniia Poeticheskogo Yazyka
886:
872:
817:. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.
308:The Language of Literature and Its Meaning
665:(4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
65:Learn how and when to remove this message
269:'s "Morphology of the Folktale" (1928).
658:The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms
646:
1841:
893:
708:. University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
552:
867:
804:Steiner, Peter. "Russian Formalism."
858:"Introduction to Russian Formalism."
779:The Slavic and East European Journal
415:
167:
18:
366:
13:
1286:Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling
14:
1860:
851:"Russian Formalism." 2 Feb. 2002.
843:
206:'s early texts, "Art as Device" (
1029:
819:
814:Russian Formalism: A Metapoetics
705:Literary Theory: An Introduction
23:
736:Journal of the History of Ideas
720:Journal of the History of Ideas
631:
555:Journal of the History of Ideas
618:
581:
546:
535:
518:Philosophy in the Soviet Union
397:Literature definition attempts
193:
175:The New Princeton Encyclopedia
1:
1356:Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve
1326:Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
1281:Anne Louise Germaine de Staël
528:
289:
796:. Cambridge Scholars, 2019.
7:
481:
347:
276:
10:
1865:
1321:Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
725:---. "Russian Formalism."
718:---. "Russian Formalism."
447:
247:
1793:Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
1186:Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux
1038:
1027:
996:Reader-response criticism
901:
786:Encyclopedia of the Novel
454:
427:Literature and Revolution
244:traditions (Garson 403).
1236:Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
991:Psychoanalytic criticism
591:, no. 5 (1924), pp. 2-3.
523:Prague Linguistic Circle
188:
185:analyzing them as such.
144:Moscow Linguistic Circle
1291:Samuel Taylor Coleridge
837:Pacific Coast Philology
450:Anti-formalism campaign
1011:Sociological criticism
981:Postcolonial criticism
916:Biographical criticism
498:Formalism (literature)
161:American New Criticism
1456:Ferdinand de Saussure
1039:Theorists and critics
748:26:4 (1992): 554-76.
738:31:3 (1970): 399-412.
715:13:2 (1954): 215-25.
685:33:3 (1974): 243-58.
503:Formalist film theory
1361:James Russell Lowell
1336:Francesco De Sanctis
1316:Percy Bysshe Shelley
1296:Wilhelm von Humboldt
1141:Lodovico Castelvetro
926:Cultural materialism
911:Archetypal criticism
781:27:3 (1983): 327-38.
770:"Boris Eichenbaum."
755:29:4 (1995): 562-64.
722:34:4 (1973): 627-38.
643:49:3 (1990): 409-26.
589:Pechat' i revolucija
382:distinctive features
1461:Claude Lévi-Strauss
1396:Friedrich Nietzsche
1351:Ralph Waldo Emerson
1311:Thomas Love Peacock
1306:Arthur Schopenhauer
1256:Mary Wollstonecraft
941:Descriptive poetics
931:Darwinian criticism
792:* Shrawan, Ashima.
764:10:1 (1980): 21-35.
652:"Russian Formalism"
1763:Hans-Georg Gadamer
1595:Philip Wheelwright
1585:Simone de Beauvoir
1381:Charles Baudelaire
1276:William Wordsworth
1271:Friedrich Schlegel
1266:Friedrich Schiller
1096:Christine de Pizan
1006:Semiotic criticism
951:Feminist criticism
895:Literary criticism
691:The Russian Review
682:The Russian Review
612:2009-12-05 at the
1849:Russian formalism
1836:
1835:
1818:Oswald de Andrade
1655:Hans Robert Jauss
1630:E. D. Hirsch, Jr.
1526:John Crowe Ransom
1421:Stéphane Mallarmé
1391:Søren Kierkegaard
1211:Giambattista Vico
1001:Russian formalism
966:Marxist criticism
839:17 (1982): 69-81.
694:42 (1983): 91-99.
488:Defamiliarization
443:socialist realism
416:Political offense
359:and the least to
226:defamiliarization
168:Distinctive ideas
106:Boris Tomashevsky
78:Russian formalism
75:
74:
67:
1856:
1813:Yokomitsu Riichi
1783:J. Hillis Miller
1748:Geoffrey Hartman
1705:Elaine Showalter
1665:Raymond Williams
1625:Martin Heidegger
1615:Gaston Bachelard
1580:Jean-Paul Sartre
1565:Monroe Beardsley
1521:Georges Bataille
1501:Boris Eikhenbaum
1476:Viktor Shklovsky
1346:John Stuart Mill
1331:Giacomo Leopardi
1176:Pierre Corneille
1033:
1016:Source criticism
888:
881:
874:
865:
864:
856:Everard, Jerry.
824:
823:
676:
664:
663:(Online Version)
661:
625:
622:
616:
606:Art as Technique
601:Viktor Shklovsky
598:
592:
585:
579:
578:
550:
544:
539:
367:Textual analysis
350:
305:
204:Viktor Shklovsky
152:Boris Eikhenbaum
110:Grigory Gukovsky
98:Boris Eichenbaum
86:Viktor Shklovsky
80:was a school of
70:
63:
59:
56:
50:
27:
26:
19:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1832:
1788:Clifford Geertz
1743:Jonathan Culler
1670:Lionel Trilling
1650:Michel Foucault
1640:Jacques Derrida
1516:Mikhail Bakhtin
1471:Walter Benjamin
1436:Antonio Gramsci
1431:Benedetto Croce
1376:Hippolyte Taine
1366:Edgar Allan Poe
1241:Joshua Reynolds
1034:
1025:
976:New historicism
903:Literary theory
897:
892:
849:Petrov, Petre.
846:
818:
801:
700:Eagleton, Terry
673:
662:
634:
629:
628:
623:
619:
614:Wayback Machine
599:
595:
586:
582:
567:10.2307/2708893
551:
547:
540:
536:
531:
484:
457:
452:
418:
399:
369:
303:
292:
279:
250:
196:
191:
170:
115:Mikhail Bakhtin
82:literary theory
71:
60:
54:
51:
40:
34:has an unclear
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1862:
1852:
1851:
1834:
1833:
1831:
1830:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1728:Félix Guattari
1724:Gilles Deleuze
1721:
1719:Murray Krieger
1716:
1710:Sandra Gilbert
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1675:Julia Kristeva
1672:
1667:
1662:
1660:Georges Poulet
1657:
1652:
1647:
1645:Roland Barthes
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1620:Ernst Gombrich
1617:
1612:
1607:
1605:Roman Jakobson
1602:
1600:Theodor Adorno
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1575:Jan Mukařovský
1572:
1570:Cleanth Brooks
1567:
1558:
1556:Ernst Cassirer
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1531:R. P. Blackmur
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1511:I. A. Richards
1508:
1506:Virginia Woolf
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1486:Irving Babbitt
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1411:Anatole France
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1371:Matthew Arnold
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1341:Thomas Carlyle
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1226:Samuel Johnson
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1206:Joseph Addison
1203:
1201:Alexander Pope
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1166:Henry Reynolds
1163:
1158:
1156:Torquato Tasso
1153:
1151:Jacopo Mazzoni
1148:
1143:
1138:
1136:Wang Changling
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1116:Anandavardhana
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1042:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1028:
1026:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
936:Deconstruction
933:
928:
923:
921:Chicago school
918:
913:
907:
905:
899:
898:
891:
890:
883:
876:
868:
862:
861:
854:
845:
844:External links
842:
841:
840:
833:
827:
826:
825:
791:
790:
789:
782:
775:
768:
765:
758:
757:
756:
742:
739:
732:
731:
730:
723:
709:
697:
696:
695:
677:
671:
648:Baldick, Chris
644:
633:
630:
627:
626:
617:
593:
580:
561:(4): 627–638.
545:
542:Washington.edu
533:
532:
530:
527:
526:
525:
520:
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
493:Film semiotics
490:
483:
480:
467:
466:
456:
453:
417:
414:
398:
395:
368:
365:
361:reduced vowels
296:Roman Jakobson
291:
288:
278:
275:
267:Vladimir Propp
249:
246:
208:Iskússtvo kak
195:
192:
190:
187:
169:
166:
140:St. Petersburg
102:Roman Jakobson
94:Vladimir Propp
73:
72:
36:citation style
31:
29:
22:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1861:
1850:
1847:
1846:
1844:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1798:Tristan Tzara
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1753:Wolfgang Iser
1751:
1749:
1746:
1744:
1741:
1739:
1738:Hélène Cixous
1736:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1690:Chinua Achebe
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1610:Northrop Frye
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1562:
1561:W. K. Wimsatt
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1551:Kenneth Burke
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1541:György Lukács
1539:
1537:
1536:Jacques Lacan
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1451:Sigmund Freud
1449:
1447:
1446:A. C. Bradley
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1261:William Blake
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1251:Immanuel Kant
1249:
1247:
1246:Denis Diderot
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1171:Thomas Hobbes
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1161:Francis Bacon
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1146:Philip Sidney
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1071:St. Augustine
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
971:New Criticism
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
908:
906:
904:
900:
896:
889:
884:
882:
877:
875:
870:
869:
866:
859:
855:
852:
848:
847:
838:
834:
831:
828:
822:
816:
815:
810:
809:
807:
803:
802:
799:
795:
787:
783:
780:
776:
773:
769:
766:
763:
759:
754:
750:
749:
747:
743:
740:
737:
733:
728:
724:
721:
717:
716:
714:
710:
707:
706:
701:
698:
693:
692:
687:
686:
684:
683:
678:
674:
672:9780191783234
668:
660:
659:
653:
649:
645:
642:
641:
640:Slavic Review
636:
635:
621:
615:
611:
608:
607:
602:
597:
590:
584:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
549:
543:
538:
534:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
513:Geneva School
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
479:
476:
475:New Criticism
471:
463:
462:
461:
451:
446:
444:
440:
439:Joseph Stalin
437:period under
436:
431:
429:
428:
423:
413:
409:
407:
406:
394:
391:
385:
383:
379:
375:
364:
362:
358:
354:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
317:
311:
309:
299:
297:
287:
283:
274:
270:
268:
262:
260:
254:
245:
241:
239:
233:
231:
227:
222:
218:
214:
212:
211:
205:
200:
186:
182:
178:
176:
165:
162:
157:
153:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:structuralism
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:Yuri Tynianov
87:
83:
79:
69:
66:
58:
48:
44:
38:
37:
32:This article
30:
21:
20:
1803:André Breton
1778:M. H. Abrams
1773:Peter Szondi
1768:Paul Ricoeur
1758:Hayden White
1695:Stanley Fish
1685:Harold Bloom
1635:Noam Chomsky
1590:Ronald Crane
1496:Leon Trotsky
1401:Walter Pater
1231:Edward Young
1216:Edmund Burke
1106:Rajashekhara
1101:Bharata Muni
1021:Thing theory
1000:
986:Postcritique
961:Geocriticism
946:Ecocriticism
836:
812:
805:
793:
785:
778:
771:
761:
752:
745:
735:
726:
719:
712:
703:
689:
680:
657:
638:
632:Bibliography
620:
605:
596:
588:
583:
558:
554:
548:
537:
472:
468:
458:
432:
425:
422:Leon Trotsky
419:
410:
403:
400:
386:
370:
335:alliteration
331:onomatopoeia
320:
312:
307:
300:
293:
284:
280:
271:
263:
255:
251:
242:
234:
229:
223:
219:
215:
207:
201:
197:
183:
179:
174:
171:
148:
135:
128:
77:
76:
61:
52:
33:
1828:Octavio Paz
1733:René Girard
1714:Susan Gubar
1700:Edward Said
1680:Paul de Man
1546:Paul Valéry
1481:T. S. Eliot
1466:T. E. Hulme
1441:Umberto Eco
1426:Leo Tolstoy
1416:Oscar Wilde
1196:John Dennis
1181:John Dryden
860:21 Dec 2005
853:21 Dec 2005
374:linguistics
194:Mechanistic
119:Juri Lotman
1406:Émile Zola
1301:John Keats
1221:David Hume
1191:John Locke
762:Diacritics
529:References
448:See also:
316:psychology
290:Linguistic
259:Zhirmunsky
230:ostranenie
156:felicitous
55:March 2012
47:footnoting
1491:Carl Jung
1386:Karl Marx
1091:Boccaccio
1051:Aristotle
956:Formalism
339:assonance
323:Osip Brik
121:, and on
1843:Category
1808:Mina Loy
1076:Boethius
1066:Plotinus
1061:Longinus
650:(2015).
610:Archived
482:See also
277:Systemic
142:and the
43:citation
1823:Hu Shih
1131:Liu Xie
1111:Valmiki
1081:Aquinas
603:(1917)
575:2708893
390:grammar
378:metrics
310:, 68).
248:Organic
238:sjuzhet
177:1101).
1121:Cao Pi
1056:Horace
669:
573:
508:OPOJAZ
455:Legacy
435:Soviet
405:Lolita
357:vowels
353:phones
337:, and
273:well.
210:priyóm
132:OPOJAZ
1126:Lu Ji
1086:Dante
1046:Plato
811:---.
798:p. 68
753:Style
746:Style
571:JSTOR
348:skrep
327:rhyme
189:Types
1726:and
1712:and
1563:and
667:ISBN
343:Brik
117:and
45:and
563:doi
445:).
424:'s
306:" (
1845::
832:).
800:.
702:.
654:.
569:.
559:34
557:.
341:,
333:,
329:,
108:,
104:,
100:,
96:,
92:,
88:,
887:e
880:t
873:v
675:.
577:.
565::
304:'
236:"
228:(
134:(
68:)
62:(
57:)
53:(
49:.
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.