Knowledge

Seismic risk

Source 📝

81:
reduction measures such as emergency planning. In calculating the risk of each facility in the 'portfolio', potential life safety and economic losses due not only to structural damage, but also to equipment, contents and business interruption are considered. Public agencies (local, state governments and federal agencies) similarly analyze their portfolios. The interconnections of infrastructures such as water, road and highway, and electric power systems are also considered. Insurance companies routinely employ estimates of seismic risk in their operations to determine appropriate insurance rates, monitor over-accumulation of policies in a small area, and purchase reinsurance. A simplified method of calculating seismic risk for a given city, involves the use of a street survey. If you know the level of seismic hazard, the damage generally follows established patterns.
85:
economic damage or casualties, for example the HAZUS computer program. While the results can be used as a general measure of seismic risk for types of buildings, the actual seismic risk for any individual building may vary considerably and will depend upon its exact configuration and condition. Acquiring and analyzing the specific data for an individual building or facility is one of the most expensive and daunting aspects of seismic risk estimation. Progress is made if one can calculate the 'fragility' or seismic capacity of the components within a structure.
20: 84:
Seismic risk is often determined using a seismic modeling computer programs which uses the seismic hazard inputs and combines them with the known susceptibilities of structures and facilities, such as buildings, bridges, electrical power switching stations, etc. The result gives probabilities for
80:
is the foundation for risk mitigation decision-making, a key step in risk management. Large corporations and other enterprises (e.g., local governments) analyze their 'portfolio' of properties, to determine how to best allocate limited funds for structural strengthening of buildings, or other risk
45:. Seismic risk has been defined, for most management purposes, as the potential economic, social and environmental consequences of hazardous events that may occur in a specified period of time. A building located in a region of high 104:
can help plan for emergencies arising from an earthquake. Building codes are intended to help to manage seismic risk and are updated as more is learned about the effects of seismic
112:. However, the changes generally do not immediately improve seismic risk in a community since existing buildings are rarely required to be upgraded to meet the revisions. 92:
or PML reviews. These guidelines specify the scope of work, qualifications of the reviewer, and proper nomenclature for reporting loss estimates.
819: 53:
principles. On the other hand, a building located in a region with a history of minor seismicity, in a brick building located on fill subject to
309: 406: 64:
which looks at the specific issues of cities. Risk determination and emergency response can also be determined through the use of an
100:
Seismic risk can be reduced by active programs that improve emergency response, and improve basic infrastructure. The concepts of
419: 319: 232: 186: 283: 88:
In 1999, ASTM produced guidelines for reporting seismic loss estimates on commercial properties, commonly known as
208: 399: 121: 768: 503: 392: 220: 325: 108:
on buildings. This type of active improvement of mitigation of damage from earthquakes is known as
101: 151: 28: 379: 380:
Diagnose the impact of global earthquakes from direct and indirect eyewitnesses contributions
364:
Infrastructure Risk Research Project at The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
126: 89: 474: 41:
is the potential impact on the built environment and on people's well-being due to future
8: 384: 65: 50: 262: 61: 783: 493: 427: 315: 182: 715: 709: 511: 415: 342: 109: 614: 567: 483: 131: 46: 813: 778: 576: 221:
Simple Survey Procedures for Seismic Risk Assessment In Urban Building Stocks
105: 773: 695: 690: 523: 436: 54: 240: 788: 674: 607: 586: 581: 459: 287: 176: 42: 284:"Seismic Reports | ASTM E2026 - Cascade Crest Consulting Engineers" 469: 798: 793: 741: 656: 651: 646: 449: 444: 748: 736: 641: 541: 23:
Lead Rubber Bearing being tested at the UCSD Caltrans-SRMD facility
731: 705: 666: 602: 533: 454: 307: 16:
Likelihood of damage to a building or system from an earthquake
374: 368: 562: 516: 347: 363: 699: 371:- Educational European project based on Google Maps Mashups 414: 353: 19: 358: 311:
Acceptable Risk Processes: Lifeline and Natural Hazards
175:
Baker, Jack; Bradley, Brendon; Stafford, Peter (2021).
174: 811: 71: 211:250TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE 1755 LISBON EARTHQUAKE 400: 308:Craig Taylor and Erik VanMarcke, ed. (2002). 209:Seismic risk evaluation for an urban centre. 95: 407: 393: 375:EMSC : Seismic real-time information 49:is at lower risk if it is built to sound 27:For broader coverage of this topic, see 18: 820:Earthquake and seismic risk mitigation 812: 388: 13: 152:"EFEHR | What is earthquake risk?" 14: 831: 350:- Seismic Risk Program for the US 336: 178:Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis 57:can be as high or higher risk. 301: 276: 255: 225: 214: 202: 181:. Cambridge University Press. 168: 144: 1: 122:Probabilistic risk assessment 72:Determination of seismic risk 769:Potentially hazardous object 7: 314:. Reston, VA: ASCE, TCLEE. 115: 10: 836: 26: 761: 724: 683: 665: 634: 627: 595: 561: 554: 532: 502: 468: 435: 426: 96:Reduction of seismic risk 263:"Fire Research Division" 137: 359:HAZUS Community website 354:An All HAZUS Web Space 102:earthquake preparedness 29:Earthquake engineering 24: 127:Probable Maximum Loss 90:Probable Maximum Loss 76:The determination of 22: 60:A special subset is 272:. 11 December 2008. 66:earthquake scenario 51:seismic engineering 420:list by death toll 243:on 30 January 2009 62:urban seismic risk 25: 807: 806: 784:Geomagnetic storm 757: 756: 623: 622: 550: 549: 494:Soil liquefaction 416:Natural disasters 827: 716:Tropical cyclone 710:Tornado outbreak 632: 631: 559: 558: 512:Pyroclastic flow 504:Volcano eruption 433: 432: 409: 402: 395: 386: 385: 343:C. Allin Cornell 330: 329: 324:. Archived from 305: 299: 298: 296: 295: 286:. Archived from 280: 274: 273: 267: 259: 253: 252: 250: 248: 239:. Archived from 229: 223: 218: 212: 206: 200: 199: 197: 195: 172: 166: 165: 163: 162: 148: 110:seismic retrofit 835: 834: 830: 829: 828: 826: 825: 824: 810: 809: 808: 803: 753: 720: 684:Cyclonic storms 679: 661: 619: 615:Limnic eruption 591: 565: 546: 534:Natural erosion 528: 498: 472: 464: 422: 413: 339: 334: 333: 322: 306: 302: 293: 291: 282: 281: 277: 265: 261: 260: 256: 246: 244: 231: 230: 226: 219: 215: 207: 203: 193: 191: 189: 173: 169: 160: 158: 150: 149: 145: 140: 118: 98: 74: 39:earthquake risk 32: 17: 12: 11: 5: 833: 823: 822: 805: 804: 802: 801: 796: 791: 786: 781: 776: 771: 765: 763: 759: 758: 755: 754: 752: 751: 746: 745: 744: 734: 728: 726: 722: 721: 719: 718: 713: 703: 693: 687: 685: 681: 680: 678: 677: 671: 669: 663: 662: 660: 659: 654: 649: 644: 638: 636: 629: 628:Meteorological 625: 624: 621: 620: 618: 617: 612: 611: 610: 599: 597: 593: 592: 590: 589: 584: 579: 573: 571: 556: 552: 551: 548: 547: 545: 544: 538: 536: 530: 529: 527: 526: 521: 520: 519: 508: 506: 500: 499: 497: 496: 491: 486: 484:Seismic hazard 480: 478: 466: 465: 463: 462: 457: 452: 447: 441: 439: 430: 424: 423: 412: 411: 404: 397: 389: 383: 382: 377: 372: 366: 361: 356: 351: 345: 338: 337:External links 335: 332: 331: 328:on 2013-12-03. 320: 300: 275: 254: 224: 213: 201: 187: 167: 142: 141: 139: 136: 135: 134: 132:Seismic hazard 129: 124: 117: 114: 97: 94: 73: 70: 47:seismic hazard 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 832: 821: 818: 817: 815: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 779:Meteor shower 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 766: 764: 760: 750: 747: 743: 740: 739: 738: 735: 733: 730: 729: 727: 723: 717: 714: 711: 707: 704: 701: 697: 694: 692: 689: 688: 686: 682: 676: 673: 672: 670: 668: 664: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 643: 640: 639: 637: 633: 630: 626: 616: 613: 609: 606: 605: 604: 601: 600: 598: 594: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 577:Coastal flood 575: 574: 572: 569: 564: 560: 557: 553: 543: 540: 539: 537: 535: 531: 525: 522: 518: 515: 514: 513: 510: 509: 507: 505: 501: 495: 492: 490: 487: 485: 482: 481: 479: 476: 471: 467: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 442: 440: 438: 434: 431: 429: 425: 421: 417: 410: 405: 403: 398: 396: 391: 390: 387: 381: 378: 376: 373: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 349: 346: 344: 341: 340: 327: 323: 321:9780784406236 317: 313: 312: 304: 290:on 2013-09-14 289: 285: 279: 271: 264: 258: 242: 238: 234: 233:"Fema: Hazus" 228: 222: 217: 210: 205: 190: 188:9781108425056 184: 180: 179: 171: 157: 156:www.efehr.org 153: 147: 143: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 119: 113: 111: 107: 106:ground motion 103: 93: 91: 86: 82: 79: 69: 67: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 30: 21: 774:Impact event 762:Astronomical 696:Thunderstorm 691:Bomb cyclone 555:Hydrological 524:Volcanic ash 489:Seismic risk 488: 437:Mass wasting 326:the original 310: 303: 292:. Retrieved 288:the original 278: 269: 257: 245:. Retrieved 241:the original 237:www.fema.gov 236: 227: 216: 204: 192:. Retrieved 177: 170: 159:. Retrieved 155: 146: 99: 87: 83: 78:seismic risk 77: 75: 59: 55:liquefaction 38: 35:Seismic risk 34: 33: 789:Solar flare 675:Megadrought 635:Temperature 608:Megatsunami 587:Storm surge 582:Flash flood 460:Debris flow 194:February 9, 43:earthquakes 470:Earthquake 428:Geological 294:2013-02-26 247:17 January 161:2024-04-08 799:Hypernova 794:Supernova 742:Firestorm 657:Heat wave 652:Ice storm 647:Cold wave 450:Avalanche 445:Landslide 814:Category 749:ARkStorm 737:Wildfire 642:Blizzard 542:Sinkhole 116:See also 732:Derecho 706:Tornado 667:Drought 603:Tsunami 455:Mudflow 318:  185:  725:Other 596:Other 563:Flood 517:Lahar 369:OIKOS 348:HAZUS 266:(PDF) 138:Notes 700:Hail 568:List 475:List 316:ISBN 270:NIST 249:2022 196:2022 183:ISBN 37:or 816:: 418:– 268:. 235:. 154:. 68:. 712:) 708:( 702:) 698:( 570:) 566:( 477:) 473:( 408:e 401:t 394:v 297:. 251:. 198:. 164:. 31:.

Index


Earthquake engineering
earthquakes
seismic hazard
seismic engineering
liquefaction
urban seismic risk
earthquake scenario
Probable Maximum Loss
earthquake preparedness
ground motion
seismic retrofit
Probabilistic risk assessment
Probable Maximum Loss
Seismic hazard
"EFEHR | What is earthquake risk?"
Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis
ISBN
9781108425056
Seismic risk evaluation for an urban centre.
Simple Survey Procedures for Seismic Risk Assessment In Urban Building Stocks
"Fema: Hazus"
the original
"Fire Research Division"
"Seismic Reports | ASTM E2026 - Cascade Crest Consulting Engineers"
the original
Acceptable Risk Processes: Lifeline and Natural Hazards
ISBN
9780784406236
the original

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.