Knowledge

R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh

Source 📝

100: 56: 87:
began procedures to remove him from the UK. Singh then took the case to the European Court of Justice citing EU free movement rules. Under EU law , a Union citizen has the right to move to a Member State other than that of his nationality, and has the right to bring certain family members, including his non-EU national spouse, with him when he does so.
165:
for a period of three or more months (there is no actual time period required by EU law but instead it is based on previous case law and its application) and then asserting the rights associated with EEA citizenship and free movement to gain access to their own country while being covered by European
86:
Singh was an Indian citizen. He had married a British citizen, and the two had resided for a time in Germany before returning to live in the UK. After they returned to the UK the couple divorced, leading to the UK government cancelling his leave to remain. He stayed and eventually the UK government
146:
rights for their non-European spouses, who are unable to join their partners because of several changes in UK immigration law aimed at reducing net migration. Through EU Regulations on Free Movement of Peoples, it provides a window of opportunity to reunite UK citizens with their spouses in the
266: 172:
In principle, the Surinder Singh route applies to all EU citizens, not just UK citizens. For example, a French husband could bring his Mexican wife into France by exercising his treaty rights in Spain. It also applies to qualifying dependent family members as well as spouses.
176:
There are several petitions circulating throughout the UK and to expats abroad that are asking people to fight this recent "government clarification" and an example is 'British people want equal rights to bring their family to the UK ' on government petition website.
284: 267:"Law Report: Spouse entitled to residence under Community law: Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department - European Court of Justice, Luxembourg, 7 July 1992" 147:
increasing number of cases where the new rules on income and other additional measures mean that such spouses of UK citizens would otherwise be separated by the requirements of increasingly strict
288: 111: 67: 209: 343: 251: 285:"Judges Thwart UK Government's Attempts to Make British Second Class Citizens – Surinder Singh Applied to Extended Family | UK Visa and Immigration Blog" 180:
The Upper Tribunal of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, comprising immigration judges Mr Haddon-Cave J and Mr Kopieczek have since ruled that the
169:
In so doing, the Surinder Singh route triggers European rights of free movement that have otherwise been removed from UK citizens by UK legislation.
338: 328: 313: 348: 17: 184:
principles apply to unmarried partners (and by analogy, other members of a British returning worker's "extended family"):
130:
It was held that EU free movement rules overrode domestic legislation and as such Singh was entitled to remain in the UK.
252:"Aliens: EC rights -- R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department" 333: 162: 32:
R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh
8: 36: 139: 148: 322: 237: 215: 143: 99: 55: 186:
Kamila Santos Campelo Cain v Secretary of State for the Home Department
43:
case involving the right of entry and residence into a nation state.
196:
This route to residence has ceased for new applicants subsequent to
197: 40: 210:
Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely
314:
European nationals and schemes (entry clearance guidance)
238:"The Britons leaving the UK to get their relatives in" 200:
although existing residency holders do not lose it.
320: 344:Court of Justice of the European Union case law 161:involves living and working elsewhere in the 264: 235: 14: 321: 138:This case established a precedent for 94: 50: 339:United Kingdom immigration case law 24: 25: 360: 329:Immigration to the United Kingdom 307: 98: 54: 349:1992 in United Kingdom case law 133: 277: 258: 254:. UK Law Gazette. 2 June 1993. 244: 229: 13: 1: 265:Ying Hui Tan (17 July 1992). 222: 7: 236:Catrin Nye (25 June 2013). 203: 90: 10: 365: 191: 46: 334:European Union case law 163:European Economic Area 18:Surinder Singh route 188:. (IA/40868/2013). 291:on 21 October 2014 110:. You can help by 66:. You can help by 37:UK immigration law 128: 127: 84: 83: 16:(Redirected from 356: 301: 300: 298: 296: 287:. Archived from 281: 275: 274: 262: 256: 255: 248: 242: 241: 233: 140:British citizens 123: 120: 102: 95: 79: 76: 58: 51: 35:3 CMLR 358 is a 21: 364: 363: 359: 358: 357: 355: 354: 353: 319: 318: 310: 305: 304: 294: 292: 283: 282: 278: 271:The Independent 263: 259: 250: 249: 245: 234: 230: 225: 206: 194: 136: 124: 118: 115: 108:needs expansion 93: 80: 74: 71: 64:needs expansion 49: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 362: 352: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 317: 316: 309: 308:External links 306: 303: 302: 276: 257: 243: 227: 226: 224: 221: 220: 219: 212: 205: 202: 193: 190: 182:Surinder Singh 157:Surinder Singh 135: 132: 126: 125: 105: 103: 92: 89: 82: 81: 61: 59: 48: 45: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 361: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 326: 324: 315: 312: 311: 290: 286: 280: 272: 268: 261: 253: 247: 239: 232: 228: 218: 217: 213: 211: 208: 207: 201: 199: 189: 187: 183: 178: 174: 170: 167: 164: 160: 158: 152: 150: 145: 142:to secure UK 141: 131: 122: 113: 109: 106:This section 104: 101: 97: 96: 88: 78: 69: 65: 62:This section 60: 57: 53: 52: 44: 42: 38: 34: 33: 27:UK legal case 19: 293:. Retrieved 289:the original 279: 270: 260: 246: 231: 214: 195: 185: 181: 179: 175: 171: 168: 156: 155: 153: 137: 134:Significance 129: 116: 112:adding to it 107: 85: 72: 68:adding to it 63: 31: 30: 29: 240:. BBC News. 216:Metock case 144:immigration 323:Categories 295:21 October 223:References 151:controls. 119:June 2016 75:June 2016 204:See also 91:Judgment 198:Brexit 192:Brexit 41:EU law 166:law. 159:route 47:Facts 297:2014 154:The 149:visa 39:and 114:. 70:. 325:: 269:. 299:. 273:. 121:) 117:( 77:) 73:( 20:)

Index

Surinder Singh route
UK immigration law
EU law

adding to it

adding to it
British citizens
immigration
visa
European Economic Area
Brexit
Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely
Metock case
"The Britons leaving the UK to get their relatives in"
"Aliens: EC rights -- R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Surinder Singh ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department"
"Law Report: Spouse entitled to residence under Community law: Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department - European Court of Justice, Luxembourg, 7 July 1992"
"Judges Thwart UK Government's Attempts to Make British Second Class Citizens – Surinder Singh Applied to Extended Family | UK Visa and Immigration Blog"
the original
European nationals and schemes (entry clearance guidance)
Categories
Immigration to the United Kingdom
European Union case law
United Kingdom immigration case law
Court of Justice of the European Union case law
1992 in United Kingdom case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.