286:
43:
158:. Such errors are inherent in the measurement process; for example lengths measured with a ruler calibrated in whole centimeters will have a measurement error of several millimeters. The error or uncertainty of a measurement can be estimated, and is specified with the measurement as, for example, 32.3 ± 0.5 cm. (A mistake or blunder in the measurement process will give an
297:) is due to factors that cannot or will not be controlled. One possible reason to forgo controlling for these random errors is that it may be too expensive to control them each time the experiment is conducted or the measurements are made. Other reasons may be that whatever we are trying to measure is changing in time (see
560:. In survey-type situations, these errors can be mistakes in the collection of data, including both the incorrect recording of a response and the correct recording of a respondent's inaccurate response. These sources of non-sampling error are discussed in Salant and Dillman (1994) and Bland and Altman (1996).
355:
Random error can be caused by unpredictable fluctuations in the readings of a measurement apparatus, or in the experimenter's interpretation of the instrumental reading; these fluctuations may be in part due to interference of the environment with the measurement process. The concept of random error
563:
These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are caused by unintended mistakes by respondents, interviewers and/or coders. Systematic error can occur if there is a systematic reaction of the respondents to the method used to formulate the survey question. Thus, the exact formulation of a
464:
quantity is repeated several times and the measurements drift one way during the experiment. If the next measurement is higher than the previous measurement as may occur if an instrument becomes warmer during the experiment then the measured quantity is variable and it is possible to detect a drift
325:
is always present in a measurement. It is caused by inherently unpredictable fluctuations in the readings of a measurement apparatus or in the experimenter's interpretation of the instrumental reading. Random errors show up as different results for ostensibly the same repeated measurement. They can
305:). Random error often occurs when instruments are pushed to the extremes of their operating limits. For example, it is common for digital balances to exhibit random error in their least significant digit. Three measurements of a single object might read something like 0.9111g, 0.9110g, and 0.9112g.
473:
If no pattern in a series of repeated measurements is evident, the presence of fixed systematic errors can only be found if the measurements are checked, either by measuring a known quantity or by comparing the readings with readings made using a different apparatus, known to be more accurate. For
444:
actual temperature is 200°, 0°, or â100°, the measured temperature will be 204° (systematic error = +4°), 0° (null systematic error) or â102° (systematic error = â2°), respectively. Thus the temperature will be overestimated when it will be above zero and underestimated when it will be below zero.
443:
can be affected by environmental temperature). When it is constant, it is simply due to incorrect zeroing of the instrument. When it is not constant, it can change its sign. For instance, if a thermometer is affected by a proportional systematic error equal to 2% of the actual temperature, and the
469:
is a measurement of a constant quantity). If the zero reading is consistently above or below zero, a systematic error is present. If this cannot be eliminated, potentially by resetting the instrument immediately before the experiment then it needs to be allowed by subtracting its (possibly
519:
Constant systematic errors are very difficult to deal with as their effects are only observable if they can be removed. Such errors cannot be removed by repeating measurements or averaging large numbers of results. A common method to remove systematic error is through
332:
is predictable and typically constant or proportional to the true value. If the cause of the systematic error can be identified, then it usually can be eliminated. Systematic errors are caused by imperfect calibration of measurement instruments or imperfect methods of
564:
survey question is crucial, since it affects the level of measurement error. Different tools are available for the researchers to help them decide about this exact formulation of their questions, for instance estimating the quality of a question using
394:: If their stop-watch or timer starts with 1 second on the clock then all of their results will be off by 1 second (zero error). If the experimenter repeats this experiment twenty times (starting at 1 second each time), then there will be a
515:
which are at 600 nm and 589.6 nm. The measurements may be used to determine the number of lines per millimetre of the diffraction grating, which can then be used to measure the wavelength of any other spectral line.
439:
Systematic errors can be either constant, or related (e.g. proportional or a percentage) to the actual value of the measured quantity, or even to the value of a different quantity (the reading of a
408:
will be systematically overestimated if the slight slowing down of the waves in air is not accounted for. Incorrect zeroing of an instrument is an example of systematic error in instrumentation.
215:. For example, length measurements with a ruler accurately calibrated in whole centimeters will be subject to random error; a ruler incorrectly calibrated will also produce systematic error.
482:' of the telephone system and found to be running slow or fast. Clearly, the pendulum timings need to be corrected according to how fast or slow the stopwatch was found to be running.
889:
DeCastellarnau, A. and Saris, W. E. (2014). A simple procedure to correct for measurement errors in survey research. European Social Survey
Education Net (ESS EduNet). Available at:
910:
478:
several times you are given readings randomly distributed about the mean. Hopings systematic error is present if the stopwatch is checked against the '
352:(ASME), discusses systematic and random errors in considerable detail. In fact, it conceptualizes its basic uncertainty categories in these terms.
1686:
390:
can be either zero error or percentage error. If you consider an experimenter taking a reading of the time period of a pendulum swinging past a
1661:
532:
The random or stochastic error in a measurement is the error that is random from one measurement to the next. Stochastic errors tend to be
349:
107:
1691:
893:
79:
584:
in a regression is measured with error, regression analysis and associated hypothesis testing are unaffected, except that the
997:
970:
874:
747:
721:
289:
Distribution of measurements of known true value, with both constant systematic error and normally distributed random error.
86:
60:
634:
247:
470:
time-varying) value from the readings, and by taking it into account while assessing the accuracy of the measurement.
800:
345:
in a predictable direction. Incorrect zeroing of an instrument is an example of systematic error in instrumentation.
126:
93:
17:
1794:
1088:
302:
1784:
1763:
1681:
1491:
382:
Sources of systematic error may be imperfect calibration of measurement instruments (zero error), changes in the
75:
64:
1610:
1789:
1496:
1150:
565:
285:
1145:
585:
398:
in the calculated average of their results; the final result will be slightly larger than the true period.
556:
The term "observational error" is also sometimes used to refer to response errors and some other types of
465:
by checking the zero reading during the experiment as well as at the start of the experiment (indeed, the
264:
which always occurs, with the same value, when we use the instrument in the same way and in the same case.
1268:
195:
are errors that are not determined by chance but are introduced by repeatable processes inherent to the
1604:
1130:
664:
639:
623:
569:
1734:
1458:
1258:
1236:
456:) are easier to detect. Measurements indicate trends with time rather than varying randomly about a
278:. It may often be reduced with standardized procedures. Part of the learning process in the various
1758:
1671:
1553:
1318:
1298:
1194:
674:
512:
649:
412:
383:
223:
183:
in measurement that lead to measurable values being inconsistent when repeated measurements of a
100:
53:
326:
be estimated by comparing multiple measurements and reduced by averaging multiple measurements.
1744:
1428:
1408:
1189:
1167:
763:
461:
357:
314:
219:
167:
1012:
The bias generated by this sort of measurement error in regressors is called attenuation bias.
282:
is learning how to use standard instruments and protocols so as to minimize systematic error.
1523:
1438:
1413:
1358:
737:
537:
496:
Systematic errors can also be detected by measuring already known quantities. For example, a
424:
1476:
1328:
1204:
1081:
592:
253:
Every time a measurement is repeated, slightly different results are obtained. The common
242:
is attributed to such errors, they are "errors" in the sense in which that term is used in
319:
Measurement errors can be divided into two components: random error and systematic error.
30:"Systematic bias" redirects here. For the sociological and organizational phenomenon, see
8:
1631:
1548:
1448:
1383:
1323:
1313:
1308:
1172:
669:
600:
533:
501:
431:
will be systematically in error if slight movement of the support is not accounted for.
1528:
1513:
1273:
1263:
1246:
1055:
1047:
943:
842:
817:
679:
581:
557:
416:
361:
239:
890:
739:
An
Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements
536:
when the stochastic error is the sum of many independent random errors because of the
1641:
1578:
1563:
1486:
1468:
1403:
1199:
1115:
1059:
1003:
993:
966:
947:
870:
847:
796:
789:
743:
717:
613:
360:. The higher the precision of a measurement instrument, the smaller the variability (
254:
188:
151:
1708:
1568:
1508:
1433:
1418:
1278:
1231:
1140:
1135:
1120:
1039:
933:
925:
837:
829:
644:
453:
395:
1676:
1666:
1443:
1423:
1338:
1241:
1216:
1211:
1184:
1162:
1074:
897:
596:
391:
348:
The
Performance Test Standard PTC 19.1-2005 "Test Uncertainty", published by the
294:
235:
540:. Stochastic errors added to a regression equation account for the variation in
386:
which interfere with the measurement process and sometimes imperfect methods of
301:), or is fundamentally probabilistic (as is the case in quantum mechanics â see
1718:
1713:
1703:
1626:
1543:
1503:
1453:
1398:
1388:
1373:
1368:
1333:
1288:
1253:
1157:
1106:
618:
479:
184:
929:
911:"Correction for measurement errors in survey research: necessary and possible"
1778:
1656:
1636:
1599:
1573:
1558:
1538:
1518:
1481:
1393:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1221:
1125:
1030:
1007:
833:
684:
466:
298:
31:
1616:
1378:
1363:
497:
420:
338:
208:
987:
851:
1533:
1303:
1293:
1283:
1179:
689:
521:
387:
334:
147:
1651:
1646:
1621:
1051:
938:
505:
342:
243:
155:
595:
is measured with error, then the regression coefficients and standard
1739:
1226:
867:
Design, Evaluation and
Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research
654:
490:
475:
204:
1043:
474:
example, if you think of the timing of a pendulum using an accurate
42:
27:
Difference between a measured value of a quantity and its true value
1698:
1583:
428:
401:
212:
992:. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 221.
568:. This information about the quality can also be used in order to
341:
with the measurement process, and always affect the results of an
659:
486:
279:
509:
196:
1028:
Cochran, W. G. (1968). "Errors of
Measurement in Statistics".
199:. Systematic error may also refer to an error with a non-zero
629:
440:
405:
180:
162:
value, rather than one subject to known measurement error.)
1097:
457:
200:
411:
Systematic errors may also be present in the result of an
1066:
588:
will be lower than it would be with perfect measurement.
493:
need to be checked periodically against known standards.
989:
Mastering 'metrics : the path from cause to effect
165:
Measurement errors can be divided into two components:
986:
Angrist, Joshua David; Pischke, Jörn-Steffen (2015).
452:
Systematic errors which change during an experiment (
67:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
891:http://essedunet.nsd.uib.no/cms/topics/measurement
788:
735:
218:Measurement errors can be summarized in terms of
1776:
575:
222:. Measurement error should not be confused with
257:used is that the error has two additive parts:
985:
864:
742:. University Science Books. p. 94, §4.1.
372:
1082:
816:Bland, J. Martin; Altman, Douglas G. (1996).
786:
908:
965:. Princeton University Press. p. 187.
815:
270:which may vary from observation to another.
1745:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making
1089:
1075:
714:The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms
527:
504:may be checked by using it to measure the
229:
937:
841:
544:that cannot be explained by the included
460:. Drift is evident if a measurement of a
127:Learn how and when to remove this message
731:
729:
377:
350:American Society of Mechanical Engineers
284:
1027:
960:
865:Saris, W. E.; Gallhofer, I. N. (2014).
708:
706:
364:) of the fluctuations in its readings.
14:
1777:
1070:
818:"Statistics Notes: Measurement Error"
726:
356:is closely related to the concept of
274:Systematic error is sometimes called
703:
65:adding citations to reliable sources
36:
869:(Second ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
795:. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
787:Salant, P.; Dillman, D. A. (1994).
308:
24:
1021:
909:Saris, W. E.; Revilla, M. (2015).
635:Errors and residuals in statistics
248:errors and residuals in statistics
25:
1806:
624:Correction for measurement error
303:Measurement in quantum mechanics
41:
979:
524:of the measurement instrument.
52:needs additional citations for
954:
902:
883:
858:
809:
780:
756:
599:are invalid. This is known as
485:Measuring instruments such as
423:. For instance, the estimated
146:) is the difference between a
13:
1:
696:
576:Effect on regression analysis
570:correct for measurement error
207:of which is not reduced when
7:
1611:DĂ©formation professionnelle
736:John Robert Taylor (1999).
606:
434:
373:Sources of systematic error
10:
1811:
1605:Basking in reflected glory
1096:
918:Social Indicators Research
791:How to conduct your survey
665:Propagation of uncertainty
640:Errors-in-variables models
626:(for Pearson correlations)
551:
367:
312:
238:or uncertainty modeled by
29:
1753:
1735:Cognitive bias mitigation
1727:
1592:
1467:
1104:
930:10.1007/s11205-015-1002-x
337:, or interference of the
1319:Illusion of transparency
834:10.1136/bmj.313.7059.744
675:Replication (statistics)
591:However, if one or more
513:electromagnetic spectrum
447:
1795:Statistical reliability
961:Hayashi, Fumio (2000).
650:Measurement uncertainty
528:Sources of random error
230:Science and experiments
224:measurement uncertainty
1785:Accuracy and precision
508:of the D-lines of the
315:Accuracy and precision
290:
220:accuracy and precision
1687:ArabâIsraeli conflict
1414:Social influence bias
1359:Out-group homogeneity
593:independent variables
538:central limit theorem
425:oscillation frequency
378:Imperfect calibration
288:
76:"Observational error"
1790:Errors and residuals
1329:Mere-exposure effect
1259:Extrinsic incentives
1205:Selective perception
534:normally distributed
61:improve this article
1554:Social desirability
1449:von Restorff effect
1324:Mean world syndrome
1299:Hostile attribution
768:Merriam-webster.com
670:Regression dilution
502:diffraction grating
140:Observational error
1469:Statistical biases
1247:Curse of knowledge
896:2019-09-15 at the
764:"Systematic error"
680:Statistical theory
582:dependent variable
558:non-sampling error
417:mathematical model
362:standard deviation
291:
240:probability theory
1772:
1771:
1409:Social comparison
1190:Choice-supportive
999:978-0-691-15283-7
972:978-0-691-01018-2
876:978-1-118-63461-5
749:978-0-935702-75-0
722:978-0-19-920613-1
712:Dodge, Y. (2003)
614:Bias (statistics)
293:Random error (or
255:statistical model
193:Systematic errors
144:measurement error
137:
136:
129:
111:
18:Systematic effect
16:(Redirected from
1802:
1569:Systematic error
1524:Omitted-variable
1439:Trait ascription
1279:Frog pond effect
1107:Cognitive biases
1091:
1084:
1077:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1015:
1014:
983:
977:
976:
958:
952:
951:
941:
924:(3): 1005â1020.
915:
906:
900:
887:
881:
880:
862:
856:
855:
845:
813:
807:
806:
794:
784:
778:
777:
775:
774:
760:
754:
753:
733:
724:
710:
645:Instrument error
601:attenuation bias
597:hypothesis tests
566:MTMM experiments
396:percentage error
330:Systematic error
309:Characterization
295:random variation
276:statistical bias
262:Systematic error
154:and its unknown
132:
125:
121:
118:
112:
110:
69:
45:
37:
21:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1768:
1749:
1723:
1588:
1463:
1444:Turkey illusion
1212:Compassion fade
1109:
1100:
1095:
1044:10.2307/1267450
1024:
1022:Further reading
1019:
1018:
1000:
984:
980:
973:
959:
955:
913:
907:
903:
898:Wayback Machine
888:
884:
877:
863:
859:
814:
810:
803:
785:
781:
772:
770:
762:
761:
757:
750:
734:
727:
711:
704:
699:
694:
609:
578:
554:
530:
450:
437:
392:fiducial marker
380:
375:
370:
317:
311:
232:
133:
122:
116:
113:
70:
68:
58:
46:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1808:
1798:
1797:
1792:
1787:
1770:
1769:
1767:
1766:
1761:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1731:
1729:
1728:Bias reduction
1725:
1724:
1722:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1704:Political bias
1701:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1634:
1632:Infrastructure
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1607:
1602:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1549:Self-selection
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1473:
1471:
1465:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1384:Pro-innovation
1381:
1376:
1371:
1369:Overton window
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1239:
1237:DunningâKruger
1234:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1151:Correspondence
1148:
1146:Actorâobserver
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1112:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1094:
1093:
1086:
1079:
1071:
1065:
1064:
1038:(4): 637â666.
1023:
1020:
1017:
1016:
998:
978:
971:
953:
901:
882:
875:
857:
808:
801:
779:
755:
748:
725:
701:
700:
698:
695:
693:
692:
687:
682:
677:
672:
667:
662:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
632:
627:
621:
619:Cognitive bias
616:
610:
608:
605:
577:
574:
553:
550:
529:
526:
500:fitted with a
480:speaking clock
449:
446:
436:
433:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
313:Main article:
310:
307:
299:dynamic models
272:
271:
265:
231:
228:
161:
135:
134:
117:September 2016
49:
47:
40:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1807:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1780:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1730:
1726:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1682:United States
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1657:False balance
1655:
1654:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1529:Participation
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1498:
1497:Psychological
1495:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1470:
1466:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1264:Fading affect
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1080:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:Technometrics
1026:
1025:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
995:
991:
990:
982:
974:
968:
964:
957:
949:
945:
940:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
912:
905:
899:
895:
892:
886:
878:
872:
868:
861:
853:
849:
844:
839:
835:
831:
828:(7059): 744.
827:
823:
819:
812:
804:
802:0-471-01273-4
798:
793:
792:
783:
769:
765:
759:
751:
745:
741:
740:
732:
730:
723:
719:
715:
709:
707:
702:
691:
688:
686:
685:Systemic bias
683:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
611:
604:
602:
598:
594:
589:
587:
583:
573:
571:
567:
561:
559:
549:
547:
543:
539:
535:
525:
523:
517:
514:
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
492:
488:
483:
481:
477:
471:
468:
463:
459:
455:
445:
442:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:based upon a
414:
409:
407:
403:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
365:
363:
359:
353:
351:
346:
344:
340:
336:
331:
327:
324:
320:
316:
306:
304:
300:
296:
287:
283:
281:
277:
269:
266:
263:
260:
259:
258:
256:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
225:
221:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:attribute or
186:
182:
178:
177:Random errors
174:
170:
169:
163:
159:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
131:
128:
120:
109:
106:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78: â
77:
73:
72:Find sources:
66:
62:
56:
55:
50:This article
48:
44:
39:
38:
33:
32:Systemic bias
19:
1642:In education
1609:
1593:Other biases
1579:Verification
1564:Survivorship
1514:Non-response
1487:Healthy user
1429:Substitution
1404:Self-serving
1200:Confirmation
1168:Availability
1116:Acquiescence
1035:
1029:
1011:
988:
981:
963:Econometrics
962:
956:
921:
917:
904:
885:
866:
860:
825:
821:
811:
790:
782:
771:. Retrieved
767:
758:
738:
713:
590:
579:
562:
555:
545:
541:
531:
518:
498:spectrometer
495:
484:
472:
467:zero reading
451:
438:
421:physical law
410:
404:measured by
400:
381:
354:
347:
329:
328:
323:Random error
322:
321:
318:
292:
275:
273:
268:Random error
267:
261:
252:
234:When either
233:
217:
209:observations
192:
176:
172:
166:
164:
143:
139:
138:
123:
114:
104:
97:
90:
83:
71:
59:Please help
54:verification
51:
1709:Publication
1662:Vietnam War
1509:Length time
1492:Information
1434:Time-saving
1294:Horn effect
1284:Halo effect
1232:Distinction
1141:Attribution
1136:Attentional
939:10230/28341
690:Test method
522:calibration
388:observation
384:environment
339:environment
335:observation
191:are taken.
150:value of a
1779:Categories
1672:South Asia
1647:Liking gap
1459:In animals
1424:Status quo
1339:Negativity
1242:Egocentric
1217:Congruence
1195:Commitment
1185:Blind spot
1173:Mean world
1163:Automation
773:2016-09-10
697:References
506:wavelength
491:voltmeters
343:experiment
244:statistics
236:randomness
173:systematic
156:true value
87:newspapers
1740:Debiasing
1719:White hat
1714:Reporting
1627:Inductive
1544:Selection
1504:Lead time
1477:Estimator
1454:Zero-risk
1419:Spotlight
1399:Restraint
1389:Proximity
1374:Precision
1334:Narrative
1289:Hindsight
1274:Frequency
1254:Emotional
1227:Declinism
1158:Authority
1131:Anchoring
1121:Ambiguity
1060:120645541
1008:877846199
948:146550566
655:Metrology
476:stopwatch
358:precision
160:incorrect
1637:Inherent
1600:Academic
1574:Systemic
1559:Spectrum
1539:Sampling
1519:Observer
1482:Forecast
1394:Response
1354:Optimism
1349:Omission
1344:Normalcy
1314:In-group
1309:Implicit
1222:Cultural
1126:Affinity
894:Archived
607:See also
487:ammeters
462:constant
435:Quantity
429:pendulum
413:estimate
402:Distance
280:sciences
213:averaged
189:quantity
185:constant
152:quantity
148:measured
1759:General
1757:Lists:
1692:Ukraine
1617:Funding
1379:Present
1364:Outcome
1269:Framing
1052:1267450
852:8819450
843:2352101
716:, OUP.
660:Outlier
580:If the
552:Surveys
368:Sources
101:scholar
1764:Memory
1677:Sweden
1667:Norway
1534:Recall
1304:Impact
1180:Belief
1098:Biases
1058:
1050:
1006:
996:
969:
946:
873:
850:
840:
799:
746:
720:
510:sodium
246:; see
205:effect
203:, the
197:system
181:errors
168:random
103:
96:
89:
82:
74:
1652:Media
1622:FUTON
1056:S2CID
1048:JSTOR
944:S2CID
914:(PDF)
630:Error
454:drift
448:Drift
441:ruler
427:of a
406:radar
108:JSTOR
94:books
1004:OCLC
994:ISBN
967:ISBN
871:ISBN
848:PMID
797:ISBN
744:ISBN
718:ISBN
489:and
458:mean
211:are
201:mean
179:are
171:and
142:(or
80:news
1699:Net
1584:Wet
1040:doi
934:hdl
926:doi
922:127
838:PMC
830:doi
826:313
822:BMJ
548:s.
419:or
63:by
1781::
1054:.
1046:.
1036:10
1034:.
1010:.
1002:.
942:.
932:.
920:.
916:.
846:.
836:.
824:.
820:.
766:.
728:^
705:^
603:.
572:.
250:.
226:.
175:.
1090:e
1083:t
1076:v
1062:.
1042::
975:.
950:.
936::
928::
879:.
854:.
832::
805:.
776:.
752:.
586:R
546:X
542:Y
130:)
124:(
119:)
115:(
105:·
98:·
91:·
84:·
57:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
